Bug#980768: gnupg2: fails to build gpgkeys_ldap, probably due to -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

2024-03-17 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-17 Thorsten Glaser  wrote:
>> Afaict ghostscript/fig2dev have stopped being blockers so I do not plan
>> on doing another upload (with more work for the other autobuilders) just
>> to temporarily disable these b-ds.

> unfortunately, imagemagick/graphicsmagick is still a problem,
> and bin:gnupg and bin:gnupg-l10n are arch:all packages, making
> it impossible for architectures where the arch:any parts have
> not (yet) built to install bin:gnupg which is a frequent B-D.

OK. The latest upload sees to have worked, both gnupg1 1.4.23-2 and
gnupg2 2.2.40-3 having been built successfully on armel/armhf.

cu Andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'



Bug#980768: gnupg2: fails to build gpgkeys_ldap, probably due to -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

2024-03-16 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hello again,

>Afaict ghostscript/fig2dev have stopped being blockers so I do not plan
>on doing another upload (with more work for the other autobuilders) just
>to temporarily disable these b-ds.

unfortunately, imagemagick/graphicsmagick is still a problem,
and bin:gnupg and bin:gnupg-l10n are arch:all packages, making
it impossible for architectures where the arch:any parts have
not (yet) built to install bin:gnupg which is a frequent B-D.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
 you introduced a merge commit│ % g rebase -i HEAD^^
 sorry, no idea and rebasing just fscked │ Segmentation
 should have cloned into a clean repo  │  fault (core dumped)
 if I rebase that now, it's really ugh │ wuahh