Bug#1056608: timeshift: Timeshift cant restore RSYNC snapshots if your system installed on BTRFS with wrong subvolume

2024-02-01 Thread theofficialgman
this bug being marked as "grave" prevents installation of timeshift
packages on some debian systems. please lower the severity of this bug
report. I am not even sure what causes apt-listbugs to block this

The following NEW packages will be installed:
  btrfs-progs libgee-0.8-2 libgnomekbd-common libgnomekbd8 libxapp1
pi-apps-9c59d247 timeshift xapps-common
0 upgraded, 8 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
After this operation, 10.1 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 file:/tmp/pi-apps-local-packages ./ timeshift 23.07.1 [570 kB]
Get:2 /home/pi/pi-apps-9c59d247.deb pi-apps-9c59d247 all 1.0 [752 B]
Get:3 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye/main arm64 btrfs-progs arm64
5.10.1-2 [677 kB]
Get:4 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye/main arm64 libgee-0.8-2 arm64
0.20.4-1 [215 kB]
Get:5 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye/main arm64 libgnomekbd-common
all 3.26.1-1 [77.2 kB]
Get:6 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye/main arm64 libgnomekbd8 arm64
3.26.1-1 [45.4 kB]
Get:7 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye/main arm64 xapps-common all
2.0.7-1 [49.9 kB]
Get:8 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye/main arm64 libxapp1 arm64
2.0.7-1 [84.5 kB]
grave bugs of timeshift (→ 23.07.1) 
 b1 - #1056608 - timeshift: Timeshift cant restore RSYNC snapshots if your
system installed on BTRFS with wrong subvolume
Summary:
 timeshift(1 bug)
timeshift will be pinned. Restart APT session to enable
**
** Exiting with an error in order to stop the installation. **
**
Fetched 1,150 kB in 0s (2,332 kB/s)
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/apt-listbugs apt returned an error code (10)
E: Failure running script /usr/bin/apt-listbugs apt
Apt finished.
Failed to install the packages!
APT reported these errors:
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/apt-listbugs apt returned an error code (10)
E: Failure running script /usr/bin/apt-listbugs apt


Bug#1023237: openjdk-11: Keep out of testing and stable

2023-06-17 Thread theofficialgman
Is there a better reason this should be kept out of testing and stable?
Many users find this openjdk-11 helpful and necessary for
stability/continuity reasons over the current LTS. Security updates will
last for 3+ more years so I don't see any reason why this should be held
back from stable and testing.