Bug#1068063: marked as done (sssd: FTBFS on armel, armhf (test failures with test_pam_xxx, test_user_xxx... for 2.9.x))

2024-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 14:38:14 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1068063: fixed in sssd 2.9.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068063,
regarding sssd: FTBFS on armel,  armhf (test failures with test_pam_xxx, 
test_user_xxx... for 2.9.x)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1068063: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068063
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sssd
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1  2.9.4-1.1
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org

Dear Maintainer,

sssd fails to build on armel, armhf.

Though test suite failure was already reported, but
target version is 1.11.5.1-1, not 2.x branch. so I've filed as a new
bug to raise attension.

  sssd: FTBFS on many archs due to testsuite failures
  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754618

FYI:

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sssd=armel=2.9.4-1.1=1711454828=0
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sssd=armhf=2.9.4-1.1=1711455028=0

Regards,
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sssd
Source-Version: 2.9.5-1
Done: Timo Aaltonen 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sssd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1068...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Timo Aaltonen  (supplier of updated sssd package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 16:36:50 +0300
Source: sssd
Built-For-Profiles: noudeb
Architecture: source
Version: 2.9.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian SSSD Team 
Changed-By: Timo Aaltonen 
Closes: 1068063 1070369
Changes:
 sssd (2.9.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release. (Closes: #1068063)
 - CVE-2023-3758 (Closes: #1070369)
Checksums-Sha1:
 55ace81ef79ae14458cbd4184ec1fefe30eb2b18 5125 sssd_2.9.5-1.dsc
 f6704a9df1303e154ef8526f9f21e2b72879c046 8001964 sssd_2.9.5.orig.tar.gz
 97c93c192966f031eee0d96ff1d3c4479519bae9 833 sssd_2.9.5.orig.tar.gz.asc
 7a46a85290f7dcc2b83495685ca2a3ac059cf19c 46192 sssd_2.9.5-1.debian.tar.xz
 2e03d2db95d52c1056650f58474c64ca0f519449 10756 sssd_2.9.5-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 42829e8d6a0a90d4fb18fe96594d38c9b67d05e18696c210e2054eda746a2cf5 5125 
sssd_2.9.5-1.dsc
 bf955cc26b6d215bbb9083eadb613f78d7b727fb023f39987aec37680ae40ae3 8001964 
sssd_2.9.5.orig.tar.gz
 2909ca4b0318378b8e7baa1d6620b307a5fb59b5fa1348b4c1c82d209a5bc2c8 833 
sssd_2.9.5.orig.tar.gz.asc
 6994b37e2d98294d0fbb9f70140307106ecbf8f1eefe259dab806c97eb873d75 46192 
sssd_2.9.5-1.debian.tar.xz
 794e38cfaa6c67621e5aa9812cc67607db6db4d6e4102c4a19e52befc55b8961 10756 
sssd_2.9.5-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 a9c5dbc56e2c9e96089a8f4dc7a1047a 5125 utils optional sssd_2.9.5-1.dsc
 fb41a516f51d3f75855c7dd6f4c16c19 8001964 utils optional sssd_2.9.5.orig.tar.gz
 cbb4ca4872c19ca0130acc52575660aa 833 utils optional sssd_2.9.5.orig.tar.gz.asc
 064f2def4a5862d0f9b296339a7b8cb8 46192 utils optional 
sssd_2.9.5-1.debian.tar.xz
 58113394bef460507c81d3325d5ddbe3 10756 utils optional 
sssd_2.9.5-1_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=s50y
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



pgp6pkvOAcKWc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#1068063: sssd: FTBFS on armel, armhf (test failures with test_pam_xxx, test_user_xxx... for 2.9.x)

2024-05-14 Thread Lucas Nussbaum 
On 05/04/24 at 10:04 -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> > 1. --- 0x2 != 0x1
> >src/tests/cmocka/test_responder_cache_req.c:2505: error: Failure!
> >
> >assert_int_equal(test_ctx->result->count, 1);
> >
> >   apparently there are 2 results returned while expected just one.
> 
> This is because of time_t now being 64bits and a "%lu" format string
> is being used to construct an ldap filter. See
> https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/issues/7276

Hi,

This one was fixed upstream.

Lucas

Bug#1068063:

2024-04-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack 
> 1. --- 0x2 != 0x1
>src/tests/cmocka/test_responder_cache_req.c:2505: error: Failure!
>
>assert_int_equal(test_ctx->result->count, 1);
>
>   apparently there are 2 results returned while expected just one.

This is because of time_t now being 64bits and a "%lu" format string
is being used to construct an ldap filter. See
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/issues/7276

> 2. --- No entries for symbol sss_dp_get_account_recv.
>src/tests/cmocka/common_mock_resp_dp.c:52: error: Could not get value to 
> mock function sss_dp_get_account_recv
>src/tests/cmocka/test_pam_srv.c:802: note: Previously returned mock value 
> was declared here
>
>  void mock_account_recv(uint16_t dp_err, uint32_t dp_ret, char *msg,
> acct_cb_t acct_cb, void *pvt)
>  {
> will_return(sss_dp_get_account_recv, dp_err);


This is part of a pam test with certificates IIRC, and was worked
around by dropping the faketime build dependency, only used for these
tests. faketime doesn't work currently
 on armhf with a 64bit time_t: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059078

Bug#1068063: sssd: FTBFS on armel, armhf (test failures with test_pam_xxx, test_user_xxx... for 2.9.x)

2024-04-01 Thread Michael Tokarev 

On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 16:59:51 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI  wrote:

Source: sssd
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1  2.9.4-1.1
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org

Dear Maintainer,

sssd fails to build on armel, armhf.

Though test suite failure was already reported, but
target version is 1.11.5.1-1, not 2.x branch. so I've filed as a new
bug to raise attension.

  sssd: FTBFS on many archs due to testsuite failures
  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754618

FYI:

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sssd=armel=2.9.4-1.1=1711454828=0
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sssd=armhf=2.9.4-1.1=1711455028=0


There seems to be two failures here.

1. --- 0x2 != 0x1
   src/tests/cmocka/test_responder_cache_req.c:2505: error: Failure!

   assert_int_equal(test_ctx->result->count, 1);

  apparently there are 2 results returned while expected just one.


2. --- No entries for symbol sss_dp_get_account_recv.
   src/tests/cmocka/common_mock_resp_dp.c:52: error: Could not get value to 
mock function sss_dp_get_account_recv
   src/tests/cmocka/test_pam_srv.c:802: note: Previously returned mock value 
was declared here

 void mock_account_recv(uint16_t dp_err, uint32_t dp_ret, char *msg,
acct_cb_t acct_cb, void *pvt)
 {
will_return(sss_dp_get_account_recv, dp_err);

  There's a similar issue: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/issues/3302 from 2014,
  "We inspected the code in question and didn't find the reason for the 
failure."

  and an ubuntu bug: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com/msg6044689.html


Not knowing neither sssd nor cmocka, but have to put this info
somewhere after looking at this thing :)

/mjt

Bug#1068063: sssd: FTBFS on armel, armhf (test failures with test_pam_xxx, test_user_xxx... for 2.9.x)

2024-03-30 Thread Kentaro HAYASHI 
Source: sssd
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1  2.9.4-1.1
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org

Dear Maintainer,

sssd fails to build on armel, armhf.

Though test suite failure was already reported, but
target version is 1.11.5.1-1, not 2.x branch. so I've filed as a new
bug to raise attension.

  sssd: FTBFS on many archs due to testsuite failures
  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754618

FYI:

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sssd=armel=2.9.4-1.1=1711454828=0
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sssd=armhf=2.9.4-1.1=1711455028=0

Regards,