Bug#463184: security.debian.org: wasn't CVE-2007-2645 fixed in DSA-1310-1?
reopen 463184 thanks I've verified it in the source code: The correct patch was used to address CVE-2006-4168, only the wrong bug number was added to the DSA. Instead of #424775 this should've read #430012. ok. so, was the security issue described in bug #424775 actually ever fixed? looking at all of the DSAs since the beginning of 2006, i only see the one upload of libexif (DSA-1310 -- which you now say fixed only CVE-2006-4168). did that upload of libexif actually address both CVE-2006-4168 and CVE-2007-2645? if so, then the DSA should be updated to indicate that this is the case. if not, then http://idssi.enyo.de/tracker/status/release/unstable needs to be updated to indicate that the CVE-2007-2645 vulnerability still exists in the archive, and the fix (http://bugs.debian.org/424775) needs to be uploaded as soon as possible. thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#463184: security.debian.org: wasn't CVE-2007-2645 fixed in DSA-1310-1?
did that upload of libexif actually address both CVE-2006-4168 and CVE-2007-2645? if so, then the DSA should be updated to indicate that this is the case. if not, then http://idssi.enyo.de/tracker/status/release/unstable needs to be updated to indicate that the CVE-2007-2645 vulnerability still exists in the archive, and the fix (http://bugs.debian.org/424775) needs to be uploaded as soon as possible. oops, i was looking at the unstable page. CVE-2007-2645 is indeed listed on the stable page (http://idssi.enyo.de/tracker/status/release/stable). btw, any chance of the fix getting uploaded to etch any time soon? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#463184: security.debian.org: wasn't CVE-2007-2645 fixed in DSA-1310-1?
Package: security.debian.org Severity: grave according to the bug report log [1], the 0.6.13-etch1 upload of libexif12 fixed the security vulnerability described by CVE-2007-2645. however, the associated DSA [2] says that the updload of 0.6.13-etch1 fixed the vulnerability described by CVE-2006-4168. it seems very likely someone mistakenly reversed the CVE numbers. so it is probably the case that CVE-2007-2645 was fixed long ago in etch, and CVE-2006-4168 still remains unadressed. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/424775 [2] http://www.debian.org/security/2007/dsa-1310 -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
