Bug#325094: crash no apache
I'm still experiencing same symptoms on apache 1.3 with newest php4-rrdtool package. apache childprocess crashes every time i try to run rrd_graph() and do not output anything. ii apache 1.3.33-8 ii librrd21.2.11-0.3 ii php4-rrdtool 1.04-15 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328707: partial patch
Here's the best patch I've been able to find for this so far.
--
see shy jo
--- linux/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c.seg2005-03-27 13:10:45.0 -0800
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c2005-03-28 10:30:24.0 -0800
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ extern int (*console_blank_hook)(int);
* Save a segment register away
*/
#define savesegment(seg, where) \
- __asm__ __volatile__(movl %% #seg ,%0 : =m (where))
+ __asm__ __volatile__(mov %% #seg ,%0 : =m (where))
/*
* Maximum number of events stored
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static inline void apm_restore_cpus(unsi
#ifdef APM_ZERO_SEGS
# define APM_DECL_SEGS \
- unsigned int saved_fs; unsigned int saved_gs;
+ unsigned short saved_fs; unsigned short saved_gs;
# define APM_DO_SAVE_SEGS \
savesegment(fs, saved_fs); savesegment(gs, saved_gs)
# define APM_DO_ZERO_SEGS \
--- linux/arch/i386/kernel/process.c.seg2005-03-27 13:10:45.0
-0800
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/process.c2005-03-28 10:30:24.0 -0800
@@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ void release_thread(struct task_struct *
* Save a segment.
*/
#define savesegment(seg,value) \
- asm volatile(movl %% #seg ,%0:=m (*(int *)(value)))
+ asm volatile(mov %% #seg ,%0:=m (value))
int copy_thread(int nr, unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned long esp,
unsigned long unused,
@@ -661,8 +661,8 @@ void fastcall __switch_to(struct task_st
* Save away %fs and %gs. No need to save %es and %ds, as
* those are always kernel segments while inside the kernel.
*/
- asm volatile(movl %%fs,%0:=m (*(int *)prev-fs));
- asm volatile(movl %%gs,%0:=m (*(int *)prev-gs));
+ asm volatile(mov %%fs,%0:=m (prev-fs));
+ asm volatile(mov %%gs,%0:=m (prev-gs));
/*
* Restore %fs and %gs.
--- linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c.seg 2005-03-27 13:10:51.0
-0800
+++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c 2005-03-28 11:16:57.0 -0800
@@ -527,10 +527,10 @@ int copy_thread(int nr, unsigned long cl
p-thread.fs = me-thread.fs;
p-thread.gs = me-thread.gs;
- asm(movl %%gs,%0 : =m (p-thread.gsindex));
- asm(movl %%fs,%0 : =m (p-thread.fsindex));
- asm(movl %%es,%0 : =m (p-thread.es));
- asm(movl %%ds,%0 : =m (p-thread.ds));
+ asm(mov %%gs,%0 : =m (p-thread.gsindex));
+ asm(mov %%fs,%0 : =m (p-thread.fsindex));
+ asm(mov %%es,%0 : =m (p-thread.es));
+ asm(mov %%ds,%0 : =m (p-thread.ds));
unlazy_fpu(current);
p-thread.i387 = current-thread.i387;
@@ -575,11 +575,11 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct t
/*
* Switch DS and ES.
*/
- asm volatile(movl %%es,%0 : =m (prev-es));
+ asm volatile(mov %%es,%0 : =m (prev-es));
if (unlikely(next-es | prev-es))
loadsegment(es, next-es);
- asm volatile (movl %%ds,%0 : =m (prev-ds));
+ asm volatile (mov %%ds,%0 : =m (prev-ds));
if (unlikely(next-ds | prev-ds))
loadsegment(ds, next-ds);
@@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct t
*/
{
unsigned fsindex;
- asm volatile(movl %%fs,%0 : =g (fsindex));
+ asm volatile(movl %%fs,%0 : =r (fsindex));
/* segment register != 0 always requires a reload.
also reload when it has changed.
when prev process used 64bit base always reload
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct t
}
{
unsigned gsindex;
- asm volatile(movl %%gs,%0 : =g (gsindex));
+ asm volatile(movl %%gs,%0 : =r (gsindex));
if (unlikely((gsindex | next-gsindex) || prev-gs)) {
load_gs_index(next-gsindex);
if (gsindex)
--- linux/include/asm-i386/system.h.seg 2005-03-27 15:33:12.0 -0800
+++ linux/include/asm-i386/system.h 2005-03-28 10:30:24.0 -0800
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static inline unsigned long _get_base(ch
#define loadsegment(seg,value) \
asm volatile(\n \
1:\t \
- movl %0,%% #seg \n \
+ mov %0,%% #seg \n \
2:\n \
.section .fixup,\ax\\n \
3:\t \
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static inline unsigned long _get_base(ch
.align 4\n\t \
.long 1b,3b\n \
.previous \
- : :m (*(unsigned int *)(value)))
+ : :m (value))
/*
* Clear and set 'TS' bit respectively
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#329486: marked as done (rmpi: needs rebuild for lam transition)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 23:02:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329486: fixed in rmpi 0.4.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 04:27:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 21:27:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp3.stanford.edu [171.67.16.138] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIIfo-0002Iw-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:27:04 -0700 Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.19.147]) by smtp3.Stanford.EDU (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8M4R2j6007031 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:27:02 -0700 Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 44C07E7DDB; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rmpi: needs rebuild for lam transition X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:27:02 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: rmpi Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Due to C++ libraries in the package, lam had to change shared library package names as part of the C++ transition. rmpi now needs to be rebuilt with the new version of lam so that it can migrate into testing. Please upload a new version of rmpi with a versioned build-depends on: lam4-dev (= 7.1.1-3.2) This is necessary since m68k has not yet built the new lam; otherwise, the new upload may get built against the old lam libraries on that platform. If you can get to this soon, that would be best, as all of lam, hdf5, and mpich are currently caught up in a large transition. Thanks! -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.30 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) --- Received: (at 329486-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 06:08:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 23:08:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIK9l-0004VH-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 23:02:05 -0700 From: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329486: fixed in rmpi 0.4.9-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 23:02:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: rmpi Source-Version: 0.4.9-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of rmpi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: r-cran-rmpi_0.4.9-2_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rmpi/r-cran-rmpi_0.4.9-2_i386.deb rmpi_0.4.9-2.diff.gz to pool/main/r/rmpi/rmpi_0.4.9-2.diff.gz rmpi_0.4.9-2.dsc to pool/main/r/rmpi/rmpi_0.4.9-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated rmpi package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:40:10 -0500 Source: rmpi Binary: r-cran-rmpi Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.4.9-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Bug#327017: fwbuilder is not installed after upgrade to kde 3.4.2.
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:59:56 -0700, Jeremy T. Bouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're waiting on me to get 2.0.9 which was released yesterday packaged and tested. Which is in itself dependent on available time which right now has a great deal of time taking up with an 8 hour full-time job, 5 hours commuting, working on tasks for paying consulting clients and preparing for a wedding in less than 2 months time. I see that there's a lot of work to do besides your maintenance of that fwbuilder package, and I know from my own experience that with a marriage in the near future you got other things in mind.. Would it be less time-consuming to make the current 2.0.7 version work again instead of upgrading to 2.0.9 ? Regards, Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328707: partial patch
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 08:10:10AM +0200, Joey Hess wrote: Here's the best patch I've been able to find for this so far. This is completely weird, any ideas why this hasn't shown up before? -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329564: epiphany: cannot be installed
Package: epiphany Severity: grave epiphany depends on libclanlib2, which no longer exists in unstable. It should be recompiled, to pick up the new libclanlib2c2. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329570: grip: cannot be installed
Package: grip Severity: grave grip depends on libid3-3.8.3, which packages no longer exists in unstable. It needs to be recompiled, so that it gets the new libid3-3.8.3c2. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329499: unsatisfied build dependency: librrd0-dev
On 22 Sep 2005, at 06:16, Matthias Klose wrote: Package: ganglia-monitor-core Severity: serious Version: 2.5.7-2 needs to be changed to librrd2-dev. A fixed ganglia 3.0.1 package is ready to go, barring some licence issues with the upstream source, which can hopefully be resolved soon. Stu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329459: emacs21: FTBFS on powerpc
Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The build fails on powerpc:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=emacs21ver=21.4a-2arch=powerpcstamp=1127111387file=logas=raw
I've also retried the build locally in a sid chroot, but the temacs
segfaults in the same way.
If you have time, could you try starting over after changing this line
in debian/rules
cd ${BUILDDIR} CFLAGS=${CFLAGS} ../../configure ${confflags}
to this
cd ${BUILDDIR} CC=gcc-3.4 CPP=cpp-3.4 CFLAGS=${CFLAGS}
../../configure ${confflags}
and let me know if this works?
This should at least let us know if it might be gcc-4.0 related.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328707: partial patch
Horms wrote: On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 08:10:10AM +0200, Joey Hess wrote: Here's the best patch I've been able to find for this so far. This is completely weird, any ideas why this hasn't shown up before? Apparently it's known breakage caused by the new binutils that I guess only just reached Debian in the past couple weeks. If you google for the error message you get several variants of the patch and a little bit of explanation. The patch isn't as partial as I thought, I'm a good way through a 2.4.27 compile now. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#329389: ipw2200-source: fails at compiling kernel module
severity 329389 normal
merge 329389 326870
thanks
Downgrading severity because it's barely a corner case. It builds with a
vanilla kernel... but suspend2 breaks it.
Mike
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 04:28:26PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: ipw2200-source
Version: 1.0.6-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
6 versions have passed, but the kernel module still doesn't compile:
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-arch-stamp build-indep-stamp configure-stamp
rm -rf modules
/usr/bin/make clean
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200'
/usr/bin/make -C driver clean
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver'
rm -f *.mod.c *.mod *.o *.ko .*.cmd .*.flags .lst *.lst
rm -rf /usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/tmp
for file in *.{c,h}; do \
sed -i -e s:\ *$::g -e s:\t*$::g $file; \
done
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver'
dh_clean
/usr/bin/make -f debian/rules kdist_clean kdist_config binary-modules
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200'
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-arch-stamp build-indep-stamp configure-stamp
rm -rf modules
/usr/bin/make clean
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `clean'. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200'
make[1]: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
/usr/bin/make -C driver clean
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver'
rm -f *.mod.c *.mod *.o *.ko .*.cmd .*.flags .lst *.lst
rm -rf /usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/tmp
for file in *.{c,h}; do \
sed -i -e s:\ *$::g -e s:\t*$::g $file; \
done
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver'
dh_clean
for templ in ; do \
cp $templ `echo $templ | sed -e 's/_KVERS_/2.6.13n/g'` ; \
done
for templ in `ls debian/*.modules.in` ; do \
test -e ${templ%.modules.in}.backup || cp ${templ%.modules.in}
${templ%.modules.in}.backup 2/dev/null || true; \
sed -e 's/##KVERS##/2.6.13n/g ;s/#KVERS#/2.6.13n/g ; s/_KVERS_/2.6.13n/g
; s/##KDREV##/atto.1/g ; s/#KDREV#/atto.1/g ; s/_KDREV_/atto.1/g' $templ
${templ%.modules.in}; \
done
if ! `dpkg --compare-versions 2.6.13n ge 2.6.4`; then \
echo **; \
echo Can't build with a kernel version lower than 2.6.4; \
echo **; \
exit 1; \
fi
export DH_OPTIONS='-pipw2200-modules-2.6.13n'
sed s/_UPSTREAM_VERSION_/1.0.6/ debian/config debian/config.new
mv debian/config.new debian/config
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean -k
# Build the module
/usr/bin/make -C driver KSRC=/usr/src/linux KVER=2.6.13n
IEEE80211_INC=/usr/include/ieee80211
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver'
mkdir -p /usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/tmp/.tmp_versions
cp /usr/include/ieee80211/*.mod
/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/tmp/.tmp_versions
cp: cannot stat `/usr/include/ieee80211/*.mod': No such file or directory
make[2]: [modules] Error 1 (ignored)
/usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux M=/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver
MODVERDIR=/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/tmp/.tmp_versions CC=gcc-3.3
-I/usr/include/ieee80211 modules
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.13'
CC [M] /usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/ipw2200.o
/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/ipw2200.c:10150:55: macro create_workqueue
passed 2 arguments, but takes just 1
/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/ipw2200.c: In function
`ipw_setup_deferred_work':
/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/ipw2200.c:10150: error: `create_workqueue'
undeclared (first use in this function)
/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/ipw2200.c:10150: error: (Each undeclared
identifier is reported only once
/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/ipw2200.c:10150: error: for each function it
appears in.)
make[4]: *** [/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/ipw2200.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [_module_/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.13'
make[2]: *** [modules] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver'
make[1]: *** [binary-modules] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200'
make: *** [kdist_build] Error 2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13n
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored:
LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Versions of packages ipw2200-source depends on:
ii debhelper 4.9.5 helper programs for debian/rules
ii ieee80211-source 1.0.3-2Source for the 802.11 (wireless)
n
ii module-assistant 0.9.4 tool to make module package
creati
Bug#329177: kaffeine: Configuration wizard is displayed each time Kaffeine starts.
I also have this problem. However, it does not make kaffeine unusable. It is very annoying, but when I just cancel the configuration dialog, kaffeine starts as usual. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#329389: ipw2200-source: fails at compiling kernel module
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 329389 normal Bug#329389: ipw2200-source: fails at compiling kernel module Severity set to `normal'. merge 329389 326870 Bug#326870: ipw2200-source: Patch for building with suspend2-patched 2.6.13 kernels Bug#329389: ipw2200-source: fails at compiling kernel module Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `severity' don't match: #326870 has `important'; #329389 has `normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328707: partial patch
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:55:24AM +0200, Joey Hess wrote: Horms wrote: On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 08:10:10AM +0200, Joey Hess wrote: Here's the best patch I've been able to find for this so far. This is completely weird, any ideas why this hasn't shown up before? Apparently it's known breakage caused by the new binutils that I guess only just reached Debian in the past couple weeks. If you google for the error message you get several variants of the patch and a little bit of explanation. The patch isn't as partial as I thought, I'm a good way through a 2.4.27 compile now. Ok, that makes sense. Let me know if the build completes and if so I'll add it to the tree. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329609: FTBFS: missing build-dependency on debhelper
Package: psutils Version: 1.17-18 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source From my build log: Automatic build of psutils_1.17-18 on hertz.aurel32.net by sbuild/kfreebsd-i386 1.170.5 Build started at 20050922-0655 ** Checking available source versions... Fetching source files... Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Need to get 79.5kB of source archives. Get:1 http://people.debian.org unstable/main psutils 1.17-18 (dsc) [561B] Get:2 http://people.debian.org unstable/main psutils 1.17-18 (tar) [65.3kB] Get:3 http://people.debian.org unstable/main psutils 1.17-18 (diff) [13.6kB] Fetched 79.5kB in 2s (36.9kB/s) Download complete and in download only mode ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: libpaper-dev, quilt Checking for already installed source dependencies... libpaper-dev: missing quilt: missing Checking for source dependency conflicts... /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/apt-get --purge $CHROOT_OPTIONS -q -y install libpaper-dev quilt Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... The following extra packages will be installed: diffstat gettext gettext-base libexpat1 libpaper1 ucf Suggested packages: cvs gettext-doc ccache Recommended packages: curl wget lynx libpaper-utils debconf-utils The following NEW packages will be installed: diffstat gettext gettext-base libexpat1 libpaper-dev libpaper1 quilt ucf 0 upgraded, 8 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/2340kB of archives. After unpacking 6740kB of additional disk space will be used. WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! ucf Authentication warning overridden. Selecting previously deselected package gettext-base. (Reading database ... 11966 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking gettext-base (from .../gettext-base_0.14.5-2_kfreebsd-i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package diffstat. Unpacking diffstat (from .../diffstat_1.41-1_kfreebsd-i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libexpat1. Unpacking libexpat1 (from .../libexpat1_1.95.8-3+libtool_kfreebsd-i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package gettext. Unpacking gettext (from .../gettext_0.14.5-2_kfreebsd-i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package ucf. Unpacking ucf (from .../apt/archives/ucf_2.001_all.deb) ... Moving old data out of the way Selecting previously deselected package libpaper1. Unpacking libpaper1 (from .../libpaper1_1.1.14-3_kfreebsd-i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libpaper-dev. Unpacking libpaper-dev (from .../libpaper-dev_1.1.14-3_kfreebsd-i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package quilt. Unpacking quilt (from .../quilt_0.42-1_kfreebsd-i386.deb) ... Setting up gettext-base (0.14.5-2) ... Setting up diffstat (1.41-1) ... Setting up libexpat1 (1.95.8-3+libtool) ... Setting up gettext (0.14.5-2) ... Setting up ucf (2.001) ... Setting up libpaper1 (1.1.14-3) ... Creating config file /etc/papersize with new version Setting up libpaper-dev (1.1.14-3) ... Setting up quilt (0.42-1) ... Checking correctness of source dependencies... Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_=*=PROVIDED=*= gcc-4.0_4.0.1-8 g++-4.0_4.0.1-8 binutils_2.16.1cvs20050902-1+kbsd libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.1-8 libstdc++6_4.0.1-8 -- dpkg-source: extracting psutils in psutils-1.17 dpkg-source: unpacking psutils_1.17.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: applying /home/buildd/build/psutils_1.17-18.diff.gz dpkg-buildpackage: source package is psutils dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.17-18 dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture kfreebsd-i386 /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean dh_testdir psnup.c /bin/bash: dh_testdir: command not found make: *** [clean] Error 127 ** Build finished at 20050922-0656 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Purging chroot-unstable/build/buildd/psutils-1.17 -- You are probably missing a build-dependency on debhelper. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.4-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages psutils depends on: ii libc0.12.3-1+kbsd.11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpaper1 1.1.14-3 Library for handling paper charact psutils recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328707: partial patch
Horms wrote: Ok, that makes sense. Let me know if the build completes and if so I'll add it to the tree. Build completed. Kernel seems ok. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: seaview: Please rebuild to undergo C++ c2 transition
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 328175 patch Bug#328175: seaview: Please rebuild to undergo C++ c2 transition There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 328175 is grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 severity 328175 grave Bug#328175: seaview: Please rebuild to undergo C++ c2 transition Severity set to `grave'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: wmanager: Please rebuild to undergo C++ 'c2' transition
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 328176 grave Bug#328176: wmanager: Please rebuild to undergo C++ 'c2' transition Severity set to `grave'. tags 328176 patch Bug#328176: wmanager: Please rebuild to undergo C++ 'c2' transition There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of seaview 20021127-4.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 328175 + fixed Bug#328175: seaview: Please rebuild to undergo C++ c2 transition Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of wterm 6.2.9-6.4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 329286 + fixed Bug#329286: wterm_6.2.9-6.3: FTBFS: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Tags were: patch sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of wmanager 0.2.1-2.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 328176 + fixed Bug#328176: wmanager: Please rebuild to undergo C++ 'c2' transition Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: All of these bugs are RC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Packages that need to be updated for the C++ ABI change are RC-buggy. severity 328173 grave Bug#328173: csound: Please rebuild to undergo C++ 'c2' transition Severity set to `grave'. close 328173 1:4.23f13-1 Bug#328173: csound: Please rebuild to undergo C++ 'c2' transition 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 1:4.23f13-1, send any further explanations to Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] severity 328174 grave Bug#328174: flwm: Please rebuild to undergo c++ 'c2' transition Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#326223: marked as done ([SECURITY] [DSA 799-1] New webcalendar packages fix remote code execution)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:04:15 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed... has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Sep 2005 14:01:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 02 07:01:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBC73-00052x-00; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 07:01:49 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (va-65-173-90-83.sta.sprint-hsd.net [65.173.90.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886E018490 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 14:01:48 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AA733BF21F; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:01:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:01:50 -0400 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 799-1] New webcalendar packages fix remote code execution Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: webcalendar Version: 0.9.45-5 Tags: security Severity: grave A second security issue has been found in webcalendar, DSA is below. Note that webcalendar is still vulnerable to the previous security issue that got DSA-766-1. What is the holdup? Michael Stone wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 =20 - ---= --- Debian Security Advisory DSA 798-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/security/ Michael Stone September 2, 2005 http://www.debian.org/security/faq - ---= --- =20 Package: webcalendar Vulnerability : remote code execution Problem-Type : input validation Debian-specific: no CVE ID : CAN-2005-2717 =20 A trivially-exploitable bug was discovered in webcalendar that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the HTTP daemon on a system running a vulnerable version. =20 The old stable distribution (woody) does not contain the webcalendar package. =20 For the stable distribution (sarge) this problem has been fixed in version 0.9.45-4sarge2. =20 For the unstable distribution (sid) this problem will be fixed shortly. =20 We recommend that you upgrade your webcalendar package immediately. =20 =20 Upgrade Instructions - =20 wget url will fetch the file for you dpkg -i file.deb will install the referenced file. =20 If you are using the apt-get package manager, use the line for sources.list as given below: =20 apt-get update will update the internal database apt-get upgrade will install corrected packages =20 You may use an automated update by adding the resources from the footer to the proper configuration. =20 =20 Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 alias sarge - =20 Source archives: =20 http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/w/webcalendar/webcalenda= r_0.9.45-4sarge2.diff.gz Size/MD5 checksum: 9908 ae927afd627778637759df5f2e4e8336 http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/w/webcalendar/webcalenda= r_0.9.45-4sarge2.dsc Size/MD5 checksum: 725 0e765e2795bba3a7ccaedea569f2475c http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/w/webcalendar/webcalenda= r_0.9.45.orig.tar.gz Size/MD5 checksum: 612360 a6a66dc54cd293429b604fe6da7633a6 =20 Architecture independent packages: =20 http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/w/webcalendar/webcalenda= r_0.9.45-4sarge2_all.deb
Bug#329618: terminates when visiting http://www.bof.fi/fin/0_new/0.1_valuuttak/
Package: mozilla-firefox Version: 1.0.6-5 Severity: grave Firefox terminates without any warning when the currency conversion table of Bank of Finland http://www.bof.fi/fin/0_new/0.1_valuuttak/ is visited. I attached gdb to the mozilla-firefox process, but it wasn't very useful: the process would terminate with status 1. about:plugins does not report any installed plugins. Marko -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329454: broken symlinks /usr/bin/boo*
H B wrote: Package: boo Version: 0.6.0.1858-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After installing boo with apt-get -t unstable install boo the expected executables booi and booc in /usr/bin are just broken symlinks to cli-wrapper which seems to be a file in package mono-common. mono-common isn't listed as a dependency of boo. Installing mono-common didn't seem to render the package useful. booi somefilefrom/usr/share/doc/examples.boo didn't do anything. OK, so mono-common needs to be a dependancy. But aside from that booi seems to be working for me: $ which booi /usr/bin/booi $ booi /usr/share/doc/boo/examples/xml.boo ?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-16? Person xmlns:xsd=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema; xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance; FirstNameHomer/FirstName LastNameSimpson/LastName Addresses Address StreetAl. Foo/Street Number35/Number /Address Address StreetAl.Bar/Street Number14/Number /Address /Addresses /Person Simpson, Homer 35, Al. Foo 14, Al.Bar What is the output you get from running this? -- sam clegg :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369 $superduper: .signature,v 1.14 2005/01/19 13:21:14 sam Exp $ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327722: patch
John, your patch looks ok. Not pretty, but looks like it will close the holes. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: gnomoradio: Please go through C++ 'c2' transition
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 328082 patch Bug#328082: gnomoradio: Please go through C++ 'c2' transition There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328082: gnomoradio: Please go through C++ 'c2' transition
tags 328082 patch
thanks
Hi Riccardo,
Under the 0-day NMU policy for the C++ ABI transition, I have prepared
an NMU for gnomoradio to fix this bug. The patch is attached, and will be
uploaded shortly.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
diff -u gnomoradio-0.15.1/config.guess gnomoradio-0.15.1/config.guess
--- gnomoradio-0.15.1/config.guess
+++ gnomoradio-0.15.1/config.guess
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
# Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,
# 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-timestamp='2005-03-24'
+timestamp='2005-08-03'
# This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
# under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
@@ -17,13 +17,15 @@
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
-# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
+# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street - Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
+# 02110-1301, USA.
#
# As a special exception to the GNU General Public License, if you
# distribute this file as part of a program that contains a
# configuration script generated by Autoconf, you may include it under
# the same distribution terms that you use for the rest of that program.
+
# Originally written by Per Bothner [EMAIL PROTECTED].
# Please send patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Submit a context
# diff and a properly formatted ChangeLog entry.
@@ -66,11 +68,11 @@
while test $# -gt 0 ; do
case $1 in
--time-stamp | --time* | -t )
- echo $timestamp ; exit 0 ;;
+ echo $timestamp ; exit ;;
--version | -v )
- echo $version ; exit 0 ;;
+ echo $version ; exit ;;
--help | --h* | -h )
- echo $usage; exit 0 ;;
+ echo $usage; exit ;;
-- ) # Stop option processing
shift; break ;;
- )# Use stdin as input.
@@ -123,7 +125,7 @@
;;
,,*) CC_FOR_BUILD=$CC ;;
,*,*) CC_FOR_BUILD=$HOST_CC ;;
-esac ;'
+esac ; set_cc_for_build= ;'
# This is needed to find uname on a Pyramid OSx when run in the BSD universe.
# ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 1994-08-24)
@@ -196,55 +198,20 @@
# contains redundant information, the shorter form:
# CPU_TYPE-MANUFACTURER-OPERATING_SYSTEM is used.
echo ${machine}-${os}${release}
- exit 0 ;;
-amd64:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo x86_64-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-amiga:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-cats:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo arm-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-hp300:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-luna88k:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m88k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-mac68k:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-macppc:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo powerpc-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-mvme68k:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-mvme88k:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m88k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-mvmeppc:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo powerpc-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-sgi:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo mips64-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-sun3:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
*:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ UNAME_MACHINE_ARCH=`arch | sed 's/OpenBSD.//'`
+ echo ${UNAME_MACHINE_ARCH}-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
+ exit ;;
*:ekkoBSD:*:*)
echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-ekkobsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
macppc:MirBSD:*:*)
echo powerppc-unknown-mirbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
*:MirBSD:*:*)
echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-mirbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
alpha:OSF1:*:*)
case $UNAME_RELEASE in
*4.0)
@@ -297,40 +264,43 @@
# A Xn.n version is an unreleased experimental baselevel.
# 1.2 uses 1.2 for uname -r.
echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-dec-osf`echo ${UNAME_RELEASE} | sed -e
's/^[PVTX]//' | tr 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ' 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz'`
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
Alpha\ *:Windows_NT*:*)
# How do we know it's Interix rather than the generic POSIX subsystem?
# Should we change UNAME_MACHINE based on the output of uname instead
# of the specific Alpha model?
echo alpha-pc-interix
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
21064:Windows_NT:50:3)
Processed: severity of 329608 is grave, tagging 329608
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 severity 329608 grave Bug#329608: php-imlib not available for php4.4 Severity set to `grave'. tags 329608 pending Bug#329608: php-imlib not available for php4.4 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328082: gnomoradio: Please go through C++ 'c2' transition
Hi Riccardo,
Ah, I seem to have overlooked some needed changes when preparing this NMU;
please find an updated patch attached.
Unfortunately, I'm concerned by what I found in this package's shlibs files:
librainbow 0 librainbow0 (= ${VERSION} )
libroboradio 0 libroboradio0 (= ${VERSION} )
libroboradio-mp3 0 libroboradio0 (= ${VERSION} )
libroboradio-audio 0 libroboradio0 (= ${VERSION} )
This indicates that these libraries are not actually exporting stable ABIs,
which would mean they shouldn't be shipped as shared libraries in Debian.
As a result, I'm not willing to NMU for this issue; please sort out with
upstream how to best fix these libraries so that they can be compliant with
Debian policy.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
diff -u gnomoradio-0.15.1/config.guess gnomoradio-0.15.1/config.guess
--- gnomoradio-0.15.1/config.guess
+++ gnomoradio-0.15.1/config.guess
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
# Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,
# 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-timestamp='2005-03-24'
+timestamp='2005-08-03'
# This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
# under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
@@ -17,13 +17,15 @@
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
-# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
+# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street - Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
+# 02110-1301, USA.
#
# As a special exception to the GNU General Public License, if you
# distribute this file as part of a program that contains a
# configuration script generated by Autoconf, you may include it under
# the same distribution terms that you use for the rest of that program.
+
# Originally written by Per Bothner [EMAIL PROTECTED].
# Please send patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Submit a context
# diff and a properly formatted ChangeLog entry.
@@ -66,11 +68,11 @@
while test $# -gt 0 ; do
case $1 in
--time-stamp | --time* | -t )
- echo $timestamp ; exit 0 ;;
+ echo $timestamp ; exit ;;
--version | -v )
- echo $version ; exit 0 ;;
+ echo $version ; exit ;;
--help | --h* | -h )
- echo $usage; exit 0 ;;
+ echo $usage; exit ;;
-- ) # Stop option processing
shift; break ;;
- )# Use stdin as input.
@@ -123,7 +125,7 @@
;;
,,*) CC_FOR_BUILD=$CC ;;
,*,*) CC_FOR_BUILD=$HOST_CC ;;
-esac ;'
+esac ; set_cc_for_build= ;'
# This is needed to find uname on a Pyramid OSx when run in the BSD universe.
# ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 1994-08-24)
@@ -196,55 +198,20 @@
# contains redundant information, the shorter form:
# CPU_TYPE-MANUFACTURER-OPERATING_SYSTEM is used.
echo ${machine}-${os}${release}
- exit 0 ;;
-amd64:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo x86_64-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-amiga:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-cats:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo arm-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-hp300:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-luna88k:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m88k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-mac68k:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-macppc:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo powerpc-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-mvme68k:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-mvme88k:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m88k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-mvmeppc:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo powerpc-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-sgi:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo mips64-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-sun3:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
*:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ UNAME_MACHINE_ARCH=`arch | sed 's/OpenBSD.//'`
+ echo ${UNAME_MACHINE_ARCH}-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
+ exit ;;
*:ekkoBSD:*:*)
echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-ekkobsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
macppc:MirBSD:*:*)
echo powerppc-unknown-mirbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
*:MirBSD:*:*)
echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-mirbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
alpha:OSF1:*:*)
case $UNAME_RELEASE in
*4.0)
@@ -297,40 +264,43 @@
# A Xn.n version is an unreleased experimental baselevel.
# 1.2 uses 1.2 for uname -r.
Bug#329462: general: standard value $LANG=[EMAIL PROTECTED] - very tiny GTK1 font
reassign 329462 libgtk1.2 severity 329462 important thanks On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 02:57:15AM +0200, Annett Fritz wrote: Package: general Severity: grave Tags: l10n Justification: renders package unusable The standard value $LANG=[EMAIL PROTECTED] breaks fontsize for some gtk1 programs like gxedit or tipptrainer. With $LANG=de_DE they show a readable font. A normal user doesn't know that when he chooses the locale dpkg-reconfigure locales during installation. Can you explain what you mean when you say it breaks fontsize? That doesn't sound to me like a bug that makes the package unusable. In any case, I fear that this bug will probably go unfixed since libgtk1.2 is no longer being developed. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#329462: general: standard value $LANG=[EMAIL PROTECTED] - very tiny GTK1 font
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 329462 libgtk1.2 Bug#329462: general: standard value $LANG=[EMAIL PROTECTED] - very tiny GTK1 font Bug reassigned from package `general' to `libgtk1.2'. severity 329462 important Bug#329462: general: standard value $LANG=[EMAIL PROTECTED] - very tiny GTK1 font Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329608: marked as done (php-imlib not available for php4.4)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:02:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329608: fixed in php-imlib 0.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 08:57:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 01:57:59 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dns.freestone.net (caladan.freestone.net) [212.25.21.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIMtz-Zk-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 01:57:59 -0700 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by caladan.freestone.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8A5130135 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:57:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from caladan.freestone.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (caladan.freestone.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23977-15 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:57:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:8e0:40:2:202:b3ff:fe09:4bd7] (fiji.ipv6.dolphins.ch [IPv6:2001:8e0:40:2:202:b3ff:fe09:4bd7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Matthias Cramer, Issuer CA Cert Signing Authority (verified OK)) by caladan.freestone.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5124130132 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:57:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:57:51 +0200 From: Matthias Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: php-imlib not available for php4.4 X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at freestone.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: php-imlib Version: 0.5-2 Severity: normal Please provide a package for php4.4 The following packages have unmet dependencies: php-imlib: Depends: phpapi-20020918 Compiles Package and Source can be found on: ftp://ftp.freestone.net/pub/debian/php-imlib_0.5-2.1_i386.deb -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_CH (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages php-imlib depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0]1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii libapache2-mod-php4 [phpapi- 4:4.3.10-15 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii libc62.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libimlib21.2.1-2 powerful image loading and renderi ii php4-cgi [phpapi-20020918] 4:4.3.10-15 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4-cli [phpapi-20020918] 4:4.3.10-15 command-line interpreter for the p php-imlib recommends no packages. -- debconf information: * php4/extension_imlib_apache: true php4/add_extension: true php4/remove_extension: true * php4/extension_imlib_apache2: true * php4/extension_imlib_cli: true * php4/extension_imlib_cgi: true --- Received: (at 329608-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 11:08:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 04:08:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIOq5-000388-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:02:05 -0700 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329608: fixed in php-imlib 0.5-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:02:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: php-imlib Source-Version: 0.5-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest
Bug#329177: kaffeine: Configuration wizard is displayed each time Kaffeine starts.
I confirm this bug too. Very annoying... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328470: bbpager: [m68k] FTBFS: undefined reference to `__gxx_personality_sj0'
Re: Christian T. Steigies in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automatic build of bbpager_0.4.1b1-1 on garkin by sbuild/m68k 42 [...] m68k-linux-gnu-g++ -O2 -I/usr/include/bt -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/X11R6/include-s -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lSM -lICE -lX11 -o bbpager bbpager.o main.o Baseresource.o resource.o wminterface.o pager.o desktop.o -lXext -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lbt -lXft -lfreetype -lz -lXrender -lX11 -lfontconfig /usr/lib/gcc/m68k-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../libbt.a(Application.o): In function `bt::Application::Application(std::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar const, char const*, bool)': Afaict, this is caused by libbt 0.70.0-4 which hasn't transitioned to the new C++ api on m68k yet (fixed in 0.70.0-5, which failed on m68k). Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug #329177: kaffeine: Configuration wizard is displayed each time Kaffeine starts.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 329177 important Bug#329177: kaffeine: Configuration wizard is displayed each time Kaffeine starts. Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#319031: Patch for this issue
Hi, http://err.no/patches/kino_segv_on_open_64bit.diff is a patch which fixes this problem. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328534: marked as done (Kernel panic on Adaptec 2100S on boot)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 05:17:30 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#328534: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 22:12:49 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 15:12:49 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from relay.cdlan.net [217.171.33.200]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EG1yL-0007PQ-00; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:12:49 -0700
Received: from cdlan.net (unknown [217.171.42.48])
by relay.cdlan.net (Postfix) with SMTP
id A9B1C124DD; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:12:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 8597 invoked by uid 1000);
Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:12:20 -
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Luca Corti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Kernel panic on Adaptec 2100S on boot
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:12:20 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp
Severity: critical
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is fixed in 2.6.13-rc7.
See http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4940.
The attached patch is taken from bugzilla.
- --- dpt_i2o.c.orig2005-08-08 08:25:46.888900616 -0400
+++ dpt_i2o.c 2005-08-08 08:30:48.062596580 -0400
@@ -1228,8 +1228,13 @@
hba_map0_area_size = 524288;
}
+ if (pci_request_regions(pDev)) {
+ PERROR(dpti: adpt_config_hba: pci request region
failed\n);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
base_addr_virt = ioremap(base_addr0_phys,hba_map0_area_size);
if(!base_addr_virt) {
+ pci_release_regions(pDev);
PERROR(dpti: adpt_config_hba: io remap failed\n);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -1239,6 +1244,7 @@
if(!msg_addr_virt) {
PERROR(dpti: adpt_config_hba: io remap failed
on BAR1
\n);
iounmap(base_addr_virt);
+ pci_release_regions(pDev);
return -EINVAL;
}
} else {
@@ -1252,6 +1258,7 @@
iounmap(msg_addr_virt);
}
iounmap(base_addr_virt);
+ pci_release_regions(pDev);
return -ENOMEM;
}
memset(pHba, 0, sizeof(adpt_hba));
@@ -1345,6 +1352,7 @@
up(adpt_configuration_lock);
iounmap(pHba-base_addr_virt);
+ pci_release_regions(pHba-pDev);
if(pHba-msg_addr_virt != pHba-base_addr_virt){
iounmap(pHba-msg_addr_virt);
}
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDKfHECUBS9R84wJERArvSAKDklqeeP5arwPWLmngMxlyLyqHQEgCfWmqH
+yGtR03pwwy65hGN8HsR6OA=
=TL9H
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
---
Received: (at 328534-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 12:18:45 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 05:18:45 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EIQ14-0006BF-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 05:17:30 -0700
From: Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#328534: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-7
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 05:17:30 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4
Source: linux-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.12-7
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the
Bug#321666: acknowledged by developer (fixed in hpoj-0.91-6)
reopen 321666 stop This bug recurred for me in hpoj-0.91-8. I have (again) reverted back to hpoj/testing (0.91-4) and printing is again working. On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 10:03:15AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: This bug was fixed with the upload of hpoj-0.91-6. If not, please reply and reopen. Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329663: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'find'
Package: fsh
Version: 1.2-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
fsh always returns the following error:
dixsept:~ fsh home
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/fsh, line 8, in ?
fsh.main()
File /usr/share/fsh/fsh.py, line 384, in main
if host.find('@') != -1:
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'find'
zsh: exit 1 fsh home
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.10-20050517
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages fsh depends on:
ii openssh-client [rsh-client] 1:4.2p1-4 Secure shell client, an rlogin/rsh
ii python2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o
Versions of packages fsh recommends:
pn ssh none (no description available)
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329665: jamin depends on jackd which isn't installable
Package: jamin Version: 0.95.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I can't install jamin because installing jackd seems to be deprecated (at least according to : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=318098 ) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages jamin depends on: ii fftw3 3.0.1-13 library for computing Fast Fourier pn jackd none (no description available) ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.0-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.8-1The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libjack0.80.0-0 0.99.0-6 JACK Audio Connection Kit (librari ii liblo00.18-1 Lightweight OSC library ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-1Layout and rendering of internatio ii libxml2 2.6.21-1 GNOME XML library ii swh-plugins 0.4.13-1 Steve Harris's LADSPA plugins ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime jamin recommends no packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Affected versions
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 318285 1.2.5-7.2 Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl Bug marked as found in version 1.2.5-7.2. found 318285 1.2.5-7.3 Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl Bug marked as found in version 1.2.5-7.3. notfound 318285 1.2.5-8 Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl Bug marked as not found in version 1.2.5-8. tags 318285 - woody sarge Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl Tags were: sarge woody patch security Tags removed: woody, sarge End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329618: terminates when visiting http://www.bof.fi/fin/0_new/0.1_valuuttak/
severity 329618 important tags 329618 confirmed thanks * Marko Mäkelä ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Package: mozilla-firefox Version: 1.0.6-5 Severity: grave Firefox terminates without any warning when the currency conversion table of Bank of Finland http://www.bof.fi/fin/0_new/0.1_valuuttak/ is visited. I attached gdb to the mozilla-firefox process, but it wasn't very useful: the process would terminate with status 1. about:plugins does not report any installed plugins. I see it too. I'll try to look at the source of page and see what's going on later this week. -- Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#329673: kamera: depends on obsolete package libexif10
Package: kamera Version: 4:3.3.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Version 4:3.3.2-2 of the kamera package depends on the obsolete (and therefore unavailable) package libexif10. This makes the 'kde' package uninstallable because of dependency problems. This problem affects only the testing distribution, and it will be corrected automatically when the KDE 3.4 packages currently in unstable enter the testing distribution. If that is likely to take a long time, either libexif10 should be put back in testing or a new version of kamera 4:3.3.2 should be created that doesn't depend on libexif10 (maybe libexif12 will work). -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#329618: terminates when visiting http://www.bof.fi/fin/0_new/0.1_valuuttak/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 329618 important Bug#329618: terminates when visiting http://www.bof.fi/fin/0_new/0.1_valuuttak/ Severity set to `important'. tags 329618 confirmed Bug#329618: terminates when visiting http://www.bof.fi/fin/0_new/0.1_valuuttak/ There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#319096: marked as done (kino: Dies with SIGILL on startup [powerpc without altivec])
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 08:17:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#319096: fixed in kino 0.76-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jul 2005 21:17:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 19 14:17:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp.tele2bedrift.no [193.216.69.194] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DuzSe-0003gz-00; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:17:09 -0700 Received: (qmail 12294 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2005 21:16:33 - Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (193.216.25.68) by smtp.tele2bedrift.no with SMTP; 19 Jul 2005 21:16:33 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jeff Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kino: Dies with SIGILL on startup X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 23:16:11 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kino Version: 0.76-2 Severity: normal Kino dies on start up saying 'Illegal instruction'. Doing an strace gives: read(3, \34\2\232\3\0\0\223\0\0\0\365\fm`a\0\270x\0\21)\345`\3..., 32) = 32 read(3, \1\0\2\233\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\20\36\0\0\21..., 32) = 32 write(2, Starting Editor, 18 Starting Editor) = 18 write(2, \n, 1 ) = 1 mmap(NULL, 147456, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x303f5000 mmap(NULL, 266240, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x30419000 --- SIGILL (Illegal instruction) @ 0 (0) --- +++ killed by SIGILL +++ So it seems to be something with the mmap. Jeff -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages kino depends on: ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libavc1394-0 0.5.1-1 control IEEE 1394 audio/video devi ii libbonobo2-0 2.10.0-1Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-0 2.10.0-1The Bonobo UI library ii libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdv4 0.103-2 software library for DV format dig ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-2 GCC support library ii libgconf2-4 2.10.1-1GNOME configuration database syste ii libglade2-0 1:2.5.1-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.5-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome2-0 2.10.1-1The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-02.10.2-2A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeui-0 2.10.1-1The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.10.1-5The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.8-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-3 Inter-Client Exchange library hi liborbit21:2.12.2-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libquicktime10.9.3-2 A library for reading and writing ii libraw1394-5 0.10.1-1.1 library for direct access to IEEE ii libsamplerate0 0.1.1-2 audio rate conversion library ii libsm6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-3 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++6 4.0.1-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-3 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxml2 2.6.20-1GNOME XML library ii libxv1
Bug#319031: marked as done (kino: Crash on File-Open... [amd64])
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 08:17:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#319031: fixed in kino 0.76-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jul 2005 11:02:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 19 04:02:28 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ylpvm29-ext.prodigy.net (ylpvm29.prodigy.net) [207.115.57.60] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1Dupro-0001dy-00; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 04:02:28 -0700 Received: from pimout3-ext.prodigy.net (pimout3-int.prodigy.net [207.115.4.218]) by ylpvm29.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6JB1wgZ016289 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 07:01:59 -0400 X-ORBL: [69.237.230.137] Received: from [69.237.230.137] (ppp-69-237-230-137.dsl.sndg02.pacbell.net [69.237.230.137]) by pimout3-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.4 outbound domainkey aix/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6JB2Mjo414338 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 07:02:24 -0400 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:00:42 + From: Max Alekseyev [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.8b4) Gecko/20050717 SeaMonkey/1.0a MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Crash on File-Open... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kino Version: 0.76-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Run kino, click File-Open..., kino crashes. Backtrace: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 46912583339152 (LWP 12836)] 0x2e18ac00 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x2e18ac00 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x2d24eea2 in g_strdup () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #2 0x2c753292 in g_value_array_sort_with_data () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #3 0x2c7399c1 in g_object_new_valist () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #4 0x2c739193 in g_object_new () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #5 0x2bc74ad9 in gtk_button_new_from_stock () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #6 0x2bcb5b66 in gtk_dialog_add_button () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #7 0x2bcce361 in gtk_file_chooser_dialog_get_type () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #8 0x2bcce435 in gtk_file_chooser_dialog_new () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #9 0x00479576 in KinoCommon::getFileToOpen () #10 0x0047fcbe in KinoCommon::loadFile () #11 0x00439df9 in on_open_activate () #12 0x2c746d22 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #13 0x2c737056 in g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #14 0x2c7468ce in g_signal_emit_by_name () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #15 0x2c745906 in g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #16 0x2c745bd3 in g_signal_emit () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #17 0x2bc74c1c in gtk_button_clicked () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #18 0x2bc75836 in _gtk_button_paint () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #19 0x2c746d22 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #20 0x2c7372d0 in g_cclosure_new_swap () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #21 0x2c737056 in g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #22 0x2c746182 in g_signal_emit_by_name () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #23 0x2c745906 in g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #24 0x2c745bd3 in g_signal_emit () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #25 0x2bc74bbc in gtk_button_released () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #26 0x2bc756f9 in _gtk_button_paint () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #27 0x2bd1d593 in _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #28 0x2c7372d0 in g_cclosure_new_swap () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #29 0x2c737056 in g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #30
Bug#323311: marked as done (FTBFS: Cannot find pkg-config)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:47:04 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#323311: fixed in gnome-keyring-sharp 0.0.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Aug 2005 01:54:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 18:54:01 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4qeO-00054O-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:54:00 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7G1rxnY012692 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:54:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E4ob1-0001KR-M0 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:42:23 -0700 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:42:23 -0700 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Cannot find pkg-config Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1023/Mon Aug 15 13:15:08 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: gnome-keyring-sharp Version: 0.0.1-3 Severity: serious gnome-keyring-sharp fails to build because it cannot find pkg-config: checking for pkg-config... no configure: error: You need to install pkg-config Making it build-depend on pkg-config fixes this problem. --=20 Matt --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDAShefNdgYxVXvBARAkECAKC1QnRsFSBLcbGjzin06AQ1boJIgQCfTFpv eQ0n+iaA7/YpyM7KWrS19ks= =urPa -END PGP SIGNATURE- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N-- --- Received: (at 323311-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 14:48:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 07:48:39 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EISLo-0005oj-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:47:04 -0700 From: Guido Trotter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#323311: fixed in gnome-keyring-sharp 0.0.1-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:47:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: gnome-keyring-sharp Source-Version: 0.0.1-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnome-keyring-sharp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnome-keyring-sharp_0.0.1-4.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnome-keyring-sharp/gnome-keyring-sharp_0.0.1-4.diff.gz gnome-keyring-sharp_0.0.1-4.dsc to pool/main/g/gnome-keyring-sharp/gnome-keyring-sharp_0.0.1-4.dsc libgnome-keyring-cil_0.0.1-4_all.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-keyring-sharp/libgnome-keyring-cil_0.0.1-4_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Guido Trotter [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gnome-keyring-sharp package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that
Bug#319667: aspell-sv: Needs repackaging for latest aspell
On tis, 2005-09-20 at 12:29 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: tags 319667 patch thank you Vill du ha hjälp med detta? Jag har implementerat de ändringar som Nja, paketet är redan klart för flera månader sedan men Brian Nelson verkar inte vilja ladda upp det. Om du har upload-rättigheter så får du gärna ladda upp mitt paket. behövs genom att kika på aspell-en och byggt ett eget paket (se http://fryken.frryd.se/~magnus/aspell-sv_0.50-2-5_all.deb). Källkodsdiff och DSC i http://fryken.frryd.se/~magnus/aspell-sv_0.50-2-5.(diff.gz|dsc). Du får ändra i debian/changelog och förstås rent allmänt kolla igenom så jag inte installerat några bakdörrar. :-) Sammanfattningsvis är det debian/control och debian/rules som ändrats och debian/dirs och debian/install har skapats (kopierats från aspell-en). configure och Makefile.pre används inte alls längre. MVH Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Erik Rigtorp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323688: Re: gs-esp: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to build shared lib.
tags 323688 + fixed-upstream thanks This is now fixed in the upstream SVN repo. Regards, Roger -- Roger Leigh Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/ Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/ GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329459: emacs21: FTBFS on powerpc
Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The build fails on powerpc:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=emacs21ver=21.4a-2arch=powerpcstamp=1127111387file=logas=raw
I've also retried the build locally in a sid chroot, but the temacs
segfaults in the same way.
If you have time, could you try starting over after changing this line
in debian/rules
cd ${BUILDDIR} CFLAGS=${CFLAGS} ../../configure ${confflags}
to this
cd ${BUILDDIR} CC=gcc-3.4 CPP=cpp-3.4 CFLAGS=${CFLAGS}
../../configure ${confflags}
and let me know if this works?
This should at least let us know if it might be gcc-4.0 related.
This fails at exactly the same point.
This was built in a clean sid chroot with just the emacs21 build-deps
and gcc-3.4 installed.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329373: err, this does not render the package mostly useless
severity 329373 important tags 329373 + confirmed thanks Hi, kernel-package is still fairly useful in its core functionality, which is creating linux kerel image packages. A small, but not insignificant, part of its functionality is missing -- namely, creating Xen packages. This shall be fixed. manoj -- The only really decent thing to do behind a person's back is pat it. Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.golden-gryphon.com/ 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Re: gs-esp: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to build shared lib.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 323688 + fixed-upstream Bug#323688: gs-esp: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to build shared lib. Tags were: upstream Bug#320851: usr/lib/gs-esp/8.15/X11.so: Shared library is not PIC Tags added: fixed-upstream thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: err, this does not render the package mostly useless
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 329373 important Bug#329373: xen.postinst contains illegal sed command Severity set to `important'. tags 329373 + confirmed Bug#329373: xen.postinst contains illegal sed command There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327788: marked as done (aspell-bn fails to install)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:47:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327788: fixed in aspell-bn 0.60.0.01.1.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 08:25:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 01:25:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEjco-0005wP-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 01:25:14 -0700 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA29768 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:25:12 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68ADFFD4B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:25:12 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 25604-10 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:25:12 +0200 (MEST) 13959 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:25:12 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j8C8PCVl028864; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:25:12 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:25:12 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: aspell-bn fails to install X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) Jumbo Shrimp XEmacs Lucid X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: aspell-bn Version: 0.60.0.01.1.1-4 Severity: serious Preparing to replace aspell-bn 0.60.0.01.1.1-4 (using .../aspell-bn_0.60.0.01.1.1-4_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement aspell-bn ... Setting up aspell-bn (0.60.0.01.1.1-4) ... aspell-autobuildhash: processing: bn [bn] Error: The file /usr/lib/aspell/u-beng.cset can not be opened for reading. --- Received: (at 327788-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 17:48:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 10:48:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIVA1-0004wV-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:47:05 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jaldhar H. Vyas) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327788: fixed in aspell-bn 0.60.0.01.1.1-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:47:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: aspell-bn Source-Version: 0.60.0.01.1.1-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of aspell-bn, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: aspell-bn_0.60.0.01.1.1-5.diff.gz to pool/main/a/aspell-bn/aspell-bn_0.60.0.01.1.1-5.diff.gz aspell-bn_0.60.0.01.1.1-5.dsc to pool/main/a/aspell-bn/aspell-bn_0.60.0.01.1.1-5.dsc aspell-bn_0.60.0.01.1.1-5_all.deb to pool/main/a/aspell-bn/aspell-bn_0.60.0.01.1.1-5_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated aspell-bn package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP
Bug#329665: marked as done (jamin depends on jackd which isn't installable)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:49:59 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329665: jamin depends on jackd which isn't installable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 14:59:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 07:59:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sp604001mt.neufgp.fr (Smtp.neuf.fr) [84.96.92.60] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EISXe-0001Me-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:59:19 -0700 Received: from routeur ([80.119.37.221]) by sp604001mt.gpm.neuf.ld (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.03 (built Jun 27 2005)) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:56:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from arthur by routeur with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EISV6-0007Vw-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:56:40 +0200 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:56:40 +0200 From: arthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: jamin depends on jackd which isn't installable Sender: arthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: jamin Version: 0.95.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I can't install jamin because installing jackd seems to be deprecated (at least according to : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=318098 ) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages jamin depends on: ii fftw3 3.0.1-13 library for computing Fast Fourier pn jackd none (no description available) ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.0-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.8-1The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libjack0.80.0-0 0.99.0-6 JACK Audio Connection Kit (librari ii liblo00.18-1 Lightweight OSC library ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-1Layout and rendering of internatio ii libxml2 2.6.21-1 GNOME XML library ii swh-plugins 0.4.13-1 Steve Harris's LADSPA plugins ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime jamin recommends no packages. --- Received: (at 329665-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 16:50:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 09:50:34 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail-b.stw-bonn.de [212.201.71.18] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIUHJ-0003Nj-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:50:34 -0700 Received: from localhost (mail-b [127.0.0.1]) by mail-b.stw-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964C0FCCD; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:50:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-b.stw-bonn.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail-b.stw-bonn.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24792-06; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:49:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kermit (pptp-212-201-74-91.pptp.stw-bonn.de [212.201.74.91]) by mail-b.stw-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B928FFCC5; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:49:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by kermit (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D8A328029; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:49:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:49:59 +0200 From: Robert Jordens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: arthur [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#329665: jamin depends on jackd which isn't installable Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;
Bug#329673: kamera: depends on obsolete package libexif10
* Michael Richters [Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:43:34 -0400]: or a new version of kamera 4:3.3.2 should be created that doesn't depend on libexif10 (maybe libexif12 will work). Yes, this is what will happen. (Technical details: packages are uploaded, we're missing an hppa build.) -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 Don't ask the barber whether you need a haircut. -- Daniel S. Greenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328470: bbpager: [m68k] FTBFS: undefined reference to `__gxx_personality_sj0'
I should probably change Build-Depends: libbt to libbt (=0.70.0-5) and release a new package. What do you think? Stan Vasilyev Christoph Berg wrote: Afaict, this is caused by libbt 0.70.0-4 which hasn't transitioned to the new C++ api on m68k yet (fixed in 0.70.0-5, which failed on m68k). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#329358: findutils: -perm doesn't work
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package findutils Ignoring bugs not assigned to: findutils severity 329358 serious Bug#329358: findutils: -perm doesn't work Severity set to `serious'. retitle 329358 findutils: '-perm +...' broken in 4.2.25 Bug#329358: findutils: -perm doesn't work Changed Bug title. notfound 329358 4.2.24-1 Bug#329358: findutils: '-perm +...' broken in 4.2.25 Bug marked as not found in version 4.2.24-1. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: setting package to findutils ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 package findutils Ignoring bugs not assigned to: findutils forwarded 329358 http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=detailitemitem_id=14619 Bug#329358: findutils: '-perm +...' broken in 4.2.25 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=detailitemitem_id=14619. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327722: marked as done (MN gopher[v3.0.9+] multiple(2) client buffer overflows. [CAN-2005-2772])
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:31:43 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Patch for Gopher bug CAN-2005-2772 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 18:09:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 11:09:33 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEWGj-0001Eq-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:09:33 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (cpe-66-207-84-23.wb.hsw.ntelos.net [66.207.84.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA031821E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:09:32 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E9CEEBF6C5; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 14:09:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 14:09:35 -0400 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MN gopher[v3.0.9+] multiple(2) client buffer overflows. [CAN-2005-2772] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: gopher Severity: grave Version: 3.0.10 Tags: security Buffer overflows have been found in the gopher client that can lead to remote code execution when connecting to malicious gopher servers. This bugtraq post is about version 3.0.9, but it doesn't seem to be fixed in 3.0.10: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dbugtraqm=3D112559902931614w=3D2 This is CAN-2005-2772. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8) --=20 see shy jo --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDJHLed8HHehbQuO8RAvJZAKCvVKXF8tV0ZsZIjS4USnA+Y/dLkQCgoXZI CVPOCJA2ORz7dVyNX57UPCo= =L2XG -END PGP SIGNATURE- --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK-- --- Received: (at 327722-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 18:32:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 11:32:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gatekeeper.excelhustler.com (excelhustler.com) [68.99.114.105] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIVry-0003rl-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:32:30 -0700 Received: from wile.internal.excelhustler.com ([192.168.1.34] ident=postfix) by excelhustler.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EIVrE-0006Vw-IR; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:31:55 -0500 Received: by wile.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 84C72C69F9; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:31:43 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:31:43 -0500 From: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Patch for Gopher bug CAN-2005-2772 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on excelhustler.com at Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:31:55 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Hello, Joey Hess has reviewed this patch and gave it the thumbs-up. I have uploaded 3.0.11 to unstable, urgency high (it has
Processed: tagging 278768
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.5 tags 278768 + wontfix Bug#278768: catdoc_0.91.5-1.woody3_arm: FTBFS: No such file or directory Tags were: woody Tags added: wontfix End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329358: [bug #14619] find -perm +... broken in 4.2.25
URL: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=14619 Summary: find -perm +... broken in 4.2.25 Project: findutils Submitted by: ametzler Submitted on: Do 22.09.2005 um 20:08 Category: find Severity: 3 - Normal Item Group: Wrong result Status: None Privacy: Public Assigned to: None Originator Name: Originator Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Open/Closed: Open Release: 4.2.25 Fixed Release: None ___ Details: Hello, this is a copy of http://bugs.debian.org/329358 reported by Ph. Marek: -- # find /usr/bin/ -type f -perm +x # ls -la /usr/bin/ | head -6 insgesamt 215060 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 94208 2005-09-21 07:59 . drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 4096 2005-07-20 10:14 .. -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 23368 2005-09-04 03:32 [ -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5644 2005-09-04 23:04 411toppm -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 39 2005-08-11 01:52 7z # find /usr/bin/ -type f | wc 21832183 41277 # find /usr/bin/ -type f -perm +o+x | wc 0 0 0 4.2.24-1 was ok. --- I have verified that 4.2.24 indeed seems to work, this breakage is new. thanks, cu andreas ___ Carbon-Copy List: CC Address | Comment +- [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Originator Email ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=14619 ___ Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329692: /usr/share/doc/mlton/user-guide not there
Package: mlton Severity: serious Version: 20050906-1 Justification: Installation fails Hi Stephen, The mlton package I got during the last upgrade fails to configure. Reason: -- postinst: if [ $1 = configure ] which install-docs /dev/null 21; then for f in mllex mlton mlyacc; do install-docs -i /usr/share/doc-base/$f done fi -- /usr/share/doc-base/mlton: Document: mlton Title: MLton Guide Author: The MLton Team Abstract: This document describes how to use MLton, a whole-program optimizing compiler for the Standard ML Programming language. Section: Apps/Programming Format: HTML Index: /usr/share/doc/mlton/user-guide/Home Files: /usr/share/doc/mlton/user-guide/*.html But looking into /usr/share/doc/mlton I only get these: biotop:/usr/share/doc/mlton# ls README README.Debian changelog.Debian.gz changelog.gz cm2mlb cmcat copyright examples guide mllex.ps.gz mlyacc.ps.gz No user-guide directory but guide. I bet that's the cause ;) Greetings Torsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#283320: Has this FTBFS bug been fixed on mipsel now?
This bug appears to have been fixed in July. remake: 5.8.4-4, failed (12 test failures) http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=perlver=5.8.4-4arch=mipselstamp=1099771004file=logas=raw remake: 5.8.4-4, failed (12 test failures) http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=perlver=5.8.4-4arch=mipselstamp=1101291814file=logas=raw repeat.rfc822.org: 5.8.4-5, failed (12 test failures) Presumably the same machine as remake... http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=perlver=5.8.4-5arch=mipselstamp=1102820411file=logas=raw remake: 5.8.4-5, failed (12 test failures) http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=perlver=5.8.4-5arch=mipselstamp=1103895333file=logas=raw solitude: 5.8.4-6, success http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=perlver=5.8.4-6arch=mipselstamp=1107362357file=logas=raw remake: 5.8.4-7, failed (outlier?) Errno architecture (mipsel-linux-thread-multi-2.4.27-sb1-swarm-bn) does not match executable architecture (mipsel-linux-thread-multi-2.4.20-pre6) at /usr/lib/perl/5.8/Errno.pm line 11. http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=perlver=5.8.4-7arch=mipselstamp=1110208039file=logas=raw remake: 5.8.4-8, failed (12 test failures) http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=perlver=5.8.4-8arch=mipselstamp=1110314271file=logas=raw solitude: 5.8.4-8, success http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=perlver=5.8.4-8arch=mipselstamp=1110579504file=logas=raw (Presumably remake was rebuilt and became rem here?) rem: 5.8.7-2, failed (only one test, t/op/fork, failed) http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=perlver=5.8.7-2arch=mipselstamp=1118196397file=logas=raw rem: 5.8.7-3, success http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=perlver=5.8.7-3arch=mipselstamp=1118273494file=logas=raw rem: 5.8.7-4, failed (only one test, t/op/fork, failed) http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=perlver=5.8.7-4arch=mipselstamp=1120885183file=logas=raw rem: 5.8.7-4, failed (only one test, t/op/fork, failed) http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=perlver=5.8.7-4arch=mipselstamp=1121067847file=logas=raw rem: 5.8.7-4, success http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=perlver=5.8.7-4arch=mipselstamp=1121104986file=logas=raw rem: 5.8.7-5, success http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=perlver=5.8.7-5arch=mipselstamp=1126486805file=logas=raw So it appears to me that this FTBFS bug filed against remake can be closed, as the machine in question has been either rebuilt or retired. I haven't actually done anything to this bug as there may be more going on here than I'm aware of, but from what I can see this isn't a bug in perl, but an issue with the buildd that has since been solved. (If remake and repeat are seperate machines, then there's at least something repeatable across machines here.) If it was/is an issue with the buildd, then the 12-test failure first appears in 5.8.4-2.2 on 2004-09-07, and last appears 2005-03-08, and the t/op/fork test failure first appears 2005-06-07 and was last seen 2005-07-11 (and a rebuild 10 hours later on the same machine didn't fail, so if this was an issue, it may have been fixed that day?) (The 12 tests failing earlier don't include t/op/fork, BTW) -- Paul TBBle Hampson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU Shorter .sig for a more eco-friendly paperless office. pgpa7RDzkcgzV.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#328470: bbpager: [m68k] FTBFS: undefined reference to `__gxx_personality_sj0'
Re: Stan Vasilyev in [EMAIL PROTECTED] I should probably change Build-Depends: libbt to libbt (=0.70.0-5) and release a new package. What do you think? I'd just wait until libbt is built on m68k and then build the m68k binary on m68k. (crest.debian.org has the build-depends installed.) Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#329697: libltdl3-dev: needs to conflict/replaces with libtool1.4 due to file overlap
Package: libltdl3-dev Version: 1.5.20-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 6.5 The move of /usr/share/aclocal/ltdl.m4 from libtool to libltdl3-dev means that libtool1.4 now clashese with libltdl3-dev. It is important to me that libltdl3-dev and libtool1.4 remain parallel- installable, so that FreeRADIUS is buildable without serious surgery of its build environment. Either a Replaces: libtool1.4, or a new upload of libtool1.4 without /usr/share/aclocal/ltdl.m4 and an appropriate Conflicts: against the previous (current) libscripts.tool1.4 would work, I think. Otherwise, maybe a diversion or something? The S390 buildd has just his this issue: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=freeradiusver=1.0.5-1arch=s390stamp=1127297196file=logas=raw -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (950, 'unstable'), (900, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libltdl3-dev depends on: ii libltdl3 1.5.20-1 A system independent dlopen wrappe Versions of packages libltdl3-dev recommends: pn libtool none (no description available) -- no debconf information -- Paul TBBle Hampson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU Shorter .sig for a more eco-friendly paperless office. pgpAMLP9mwsfN.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: found 329043 in 2.3.5-3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 found 329043 2.3.5-3 Bug#329043: /usr/include/bits/syscall.h incomplete Bug marked as found in version 2.3.5-3. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329698: trustees: Please improve description; properly package kernel stuff
Package: trustees Version: 2.8-3 Severity: serious First off, the description really should mention the necissity of kernel patches. It should especially mention the supported versions, which apparently don't include 2.6 and later versions of 2.4. Looking at the patches in the package, I don't see any current kernels. I haven't actually tested to see if they apply to new kernels, much less work. Second, those kernel patches do not belong in /usr/share/doc. They belong where kernel-package can find and use them. Perhaps even in a seperate kernel-patch-FOO package, for consitency's sake. They are not documentation; they are code that is an essential part of this pacakge. Putting them in /usr/share/doc is a violation of the FHS and of Debian policy (e.g., 12.3, Packages must not require the existence of any files in /usr/share/doc/ in order to function) -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages trustees depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.13Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- debconf information excluded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329697: libltdl3-dev: needs to conflict/replaces with libtool1.4 due to file overlap
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 06:26:21AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote: Package: libltdl3-dev Version: 1.5.20-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 6.5 The move of /usr/share/aclocal/ltdl.m4 from libtool to libltdl3-dev means that libtool1.4 now clashese with libltdl3-dev. It is important to me that libltdl3-dev and libtool1.4 remain parallel- installable, so that FreeRADIUS is buildable without serious surgery of its build environment. Actually, libtool1.4 is about to be removed. It's been orphaned for a very long time and planned to be removed after sarge's release. Nobody has reassigned it yet however. I suggest you start making it build with the current libtool. I have no idea about freeradius, but could look at it if you want. Either a Replaces: libtool1.4, or a new upload of libtool1.4 without /usr/share/aclocal/ltdl.m4 and an appropriate Conflicts: against the previous (current) libscripts.tool1.4 would work, I think. I don't think a Replaces is the proper thing to do here. I think the best thing to do is add a Conflicts. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of libnss-ldap 238-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 316973 + fixed Bug#316973: libnss-ldap: [CAN-2005-2069] Does not use TLS for referred connections Tags were: security Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328206: marked as done (lam: FTBFS on m68k due to ICE, try lower optimization?)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:47:47 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#328206: fixed in lam 7.1.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 05:41:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 22:41:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp3.stanford.edu [171.67.16.138] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EFQ1g-00011d-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:41:44 -0700 Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.19.147]) by smtp3.Stanford.EDU (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8E5fhC6030178 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:41:43 -0700 Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DE682E7955; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:41:42 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lam: FTBFS on m68k due to ICE, try lower optimization? X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:41:42 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: lam Severity: serious Justification: Policy 4.2 lam currently fails to build on m68k due to an internal gcc error: ndi_parse.c: In function 'ndi_parse1': ndi_parse.c:241: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0/README.Bugs. This needs to be fixed in gcc, but in the meantime it's holding up the lam transition into testing, which in turn is holding up hdf5 and mpich. Perhaps you could try lowering the optimization to -O2 on m68k to see if that works around this problem? I took a quick look and didn't see the obvious way to make this change, but if you need help finding a clean way to make this happen, please let me know and I'll take a closer look. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.30 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) --- Received: (at 328206-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 20:50:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 13:50:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIXyt-0001Vr-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:47:47 -0700 From: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#328206: fixed in lam 7.1.1-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:47:47 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Source: lam Source-Version: 7.1.1-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lam, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lam-mpidoc_7.1.1-4_all.deb to pool/main/l/lam/lam-mpidoc_7.1.1-4_all.deb lam-runtime_7.1.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lam/lam-runtime_7.1.1-4_i386.deb lam4-dev_7.1.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lam/lam4-dev_7.1.1-4_i386.deb lam4c2_7.1.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lam/lam4c2_7.1.1-4_i386.deb lam_7.1.1-4.diff.gz to pool/main/l/lam/lam_7.1.1-4.diff.gz lam_7.1.1-4.dsc to pool/main/l/lam/lam_7.1.1-4.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Camm Maguire [EMAIL
Bug#328975: marked as done (libcrypto++: FTBFS on arm, m68k, hppa; use g++-3.4 there)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:48:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#328975: fixed in libcrypto++ 5.2.1c2-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 14:21:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 07:21:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EH02N-0006bD-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 07:20:59 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EH02L-t3-L7 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:20:57 +0200 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:20:57 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libcrypto++: FTBFS on arm, m68k, hppa; use g++-3.4 there Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Package: libcrypto++ Version: 5.2.1c2-5 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hello, libcrypto++ FTBFS on arm, m68k and hppa due to GCC 4 giving an Internal Compiler Error there. Using -O1 or -O0 does not help, so the workaround is to compile with g++-3.4 on those architectures (this is possible because the C++ ABIs of 3.4 and 4.0 are compatible). A patch is attached (build tested on paer). If needed, I can upload myself. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 Listening to: Ana Belén - Peces de ciudad A lie can go round the world before the truth has got its boots on. -- Terry Pratchett --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=libcrypto++-gcc3.4.diff diff -u -rua libcrypto++-5.2.1c2.orig/debian/control libcrypto++-5.2.1c2/debian/control --- libcrypto++-5.2.1c2.orig/debian/control 2005-09-18 16:14:31.0 +0200 +++ libcrypto++-5.2.1c2/debian/control 2005-09-18 16:14:16.0 +0200 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Maintainer: Jens Peter Secher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uploaders: Pierre Machard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Standards-Version: 3.6.2 -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4), automake1.9, autoconf, libtool, dpatch +Build-Depends: g++-3.4 [arm m68k hppa], debhelper (= 4), automake1.9, autoconf, libtool, dpatch Build-Depends-Indep: doxygen Package: libcrypto++5.2c2 diff -u -rua libcrypto++-5.2.1c2.orig/debian/rules libcrypto++-5.2.1c2/debian/rules --- libcrypto++-5.2.1c2.orig/debian/rules 2005-09-18 16:14:31.0 +0200 +++ libcrypto++-5.2.1c2/debian/rules2005-09-18 16:14:13.0 +0200 @@ -36,6 +36,16 @@ cflags += -ffunction-sections endif +# gcc4 ICEs on some arches +GCC4_ICES_HERE := arm m68k hppa +DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU) + +ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU),$(GCC4_ICES_HERE))) +export CC=gcc-3.4 +export CPP=cpp-3.4 +export CXX=g++-3.4 +endif + autotools_input := configure.ac Makefile.am config.h.in autoclean: --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N-- --- Received: (at 328975-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 20:50:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 13:50:48 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIXzC-0001mm-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:48:06 -0700 From: Jens Peter Secher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#328975: fixed in libcrypto++ 5.2.1c2-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:48:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
Bug#329609: marked as done (FTBFS: missing build-dependency on debhelper)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:48:28 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329609: fixed in psutils 1.17-19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 09:07:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 02:07:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from farad.aurel32.net [82.232.2.251] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIN2l-0005yS-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 02:07:03 -0700 Received: from hertz.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:fc13:2e0:18ff:fea3:b80f]) by farad.aurel32.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1EIN2j-0004oW-Nk; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:07:01 +0200 Received: from aurel32 by hertz.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EIN2j-0005RX-IK; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:07:01 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: missing build-dependency on debhelper X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:07:01 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: psutils Version: 1.17-18 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source From my build log: Automatic build of psutils_1.17-18 on hertz.aurel32.net by sbuild/kfreebsd-i386 1.170.5 Build started at 20050922-0655 ** Checking available source versions... Fetching source files... Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Need to get 79.5kB of source archives. Get:1 http://people.debian.org unstable/main psutils 1.17-18 (dsc) [561B] Get:2 http://people.debian.org unstable/main psutils 1.17-18 (tar) [65.3kB] Get:3 http://people.debian.org unstable/main psutils 1.17-18 (diff) [13.6kB] Fetched 79.5kB in 2s (36.9kB/s) Download complete and in download only mode ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: libpaper-dev, quilt Checking for already installed source dependencies... libpaper-dev: missing quilt: missing Checking for source dependency conflicts... /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/apt-get --purge $CHROOT_OPTIONS -q -y install libpaper-dev quilt Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... The following extra packages will be installed: diffstat gettext gettext-base libexpat1 libpaper1 ucf Suggested packages: cvs gettext-doc ccache Recommended packages: curl wget lynx libpaper-utils debconf-utils The following NEW packages will be installed: diffstat gettext gettext-base libexpat1 libpaper-dev libpaper1 quilt ucf 0 upgraded, 8 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/2340kB of archives. After unpacking 6740kB of additional disk space will be used. WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! ucf Authentication warning overridden. Selecting previously deselected package gettext-base. (Reading database ... 11966 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking gettext-base (from .../gettext-base_0.14.5-2_kfreebsd-i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package diffstat. Unpacking diffstat (from .../diffstat_1.41-1_kfreebsd-i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libexpat1. Unpacking libexpat1 (from .../libexpat1_1.95.8-3+libtool_kfreebsd-i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package gettext. Unpacking gettext (from .../gettext_0.14.5-2_kfreebsd-i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package ucf. Unpacking ucf (from .../apt/archives/ucf_2.001_all.deb) ... Moving old data out of the way Selecting previously deselected package libpaper1. Unpacking libpaper1 (from .../libpaper1_1.1.14-3_kfreebsd-i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libpaper-dev. Unpacking libpaper-dev (from .../libpaper-dev_1.1.14-3_kfreebsd-i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package quilt. Unpacking quilt (from .../quilt_0.42-1_kfreebsd-i386.deb) ... Setting up gettext-base (0.14.5-2) ... Setting up diffstat (1.41-1) ... Setting up libexpat1 (1.95.8-3+libtool) ... Setting up gettext (0.14.5-2) ... Setting up ucf (2.001
Bug#329698: marked as done (trustees: Please improve description; properly package kernel stuff)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:25:31 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329698: trustees: Please improve description; properly package kernel stuff has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 20:36:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 13:36:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (anthony.metrics.net) [216.181.68.19] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIXnh-00059A-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:36:13 -0700 Received: from anthony by anthony.metrics.net with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EIXng-00061U-8H for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:36:12 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: trustees: Please improve description; properly package kernel stuff X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:36:12 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: trustees Version: 2.8-3 Severity: serious First off, the description really should mention the necissity of kernel patches. It should especially mention the supported versions, which apparently don't include 2.6 and later versions of 2.4. Looking at the patches in the package, I don't see any current kernels. I haven't actually tested to see if they apply to new kernels, much less work. Second, those kernel patches do not belong in /usr/share/doc. They belong where kernel-package can find and use them. Perhaps even in a seperate kernel-patch-FOO package, for consitency's sake. They are not documentation; they are code that is an essential part of this pacakge. Putting them in /usr/share/doc is a violation of the FHS and of Debian policy (e.g., 12.3, Packages must not require the existence of any files in /usr/share/doc/ in order to function) -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages trustees depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.13Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- debconf information excluded --- Received: (at 329698-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 21:25:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 14:25:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIYZ6-0001oN-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:25:13 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8MLP8MG016645 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:25:08 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j8MLPVhS015139 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:25:31 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id j8MLPVwe015137; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:25:31 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: diziet.irb.hr: mvela set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#329698: trustees: Please improve description; properly package kernel stuff References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:25:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anthony DeRobertis's message of Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:36:12 -0400) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Hello, Unfortunately, trustees was
Processed: Makes the package unusable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 320752 grave Bug#320752: sendmail not found Severity set to `grave'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329709: libkrb53: Fails to link on powerpc
Package: libkrb53
Version: 1.3.6-5
Severity: serious
Justification: Causes other packages to FTBFS
This example program fails to link with -lkrb5 on powerpc. This is
apparently due to a binutils change. Rebuilding in an up-to-date
sid chroot fixes this.
configure:6951: gcc -o conftest -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wpointer-arith -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wold-style-definition
-Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing -D_GNU_SOURCEconftest.c -lkrb5
-lcom_err -lz -lreadline -lcrypt -lresolv -lnsl -ldl -lm 5
conftest.c: In function 'main':
conftest.c:32: warning: old-style function definition
/usr/bin/ld: dynamic variable `_SDA_BASE_@@krb5_3_MIT' is zero size
/usr/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../lib/crt1.o(.rodata+0x0):
unresolvable R_PPC_ADDR32 relocation against symbol
`_SDA_BASE_@@krb5_3_MIT'
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
configure:6957: $? = 1
configure: failed program was:
| /* confdefs.h. */
|
| #define PACKAGE_NAME PostgreSQL
| #define PACKAGE_TARNAME postgresql
| #define PACKAGE_VERSION 8.1beta2
| #define PACKAGE_STRING PostgreSQL 8.1beta2
| #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
| #define PG_VERSION 8.1beta2
| #define DEF_PGPORT 5432
| #define DEF_PGPORT_STR 5432
| #define PG_VERSION_STR PostgreSQL 8.1beta2 on
powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 20050917
(prerelease) (Debian 4.0.1-8)
| #define KRB5 1
| #define PG_KRB_SRVNAM postgres
| #define HAVE_LIBM 1
| #define HAVE_LIBDL 1
| #define HAVE_LIBNSL 1
| #define HAVE_LIBRESOLV 1
| #define HAVE_LIBREADLINE 1
| #define HAVE_LIBZ 1
| #define HAVE_SPINLOCKS 1
| /* end confdefs.h. */
|
| /* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error. */
| #ifdef __cplusplus
| extern C
| #endif
| /* We use char because int might match the return type of a gcc2
|builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply. */
| char krb5_encrypt ();
| int
| main ()
| {
| krb5_encrypt ();
| ;
| return 0;
| }
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.1
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages libkrb53 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libcomerr21.38-2 common error description library
libkrb53 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329692: /usr/share/doc/mlton/user-guide not there
The mlton package I got during the last upgrade fails to configure. ... No user-guide directory but guide. I bet that's the cause ;) Indeed. I committed a fix and the bug will be closed with my next upload to debian. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: New life in an old bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 288547 serious Bug#288547: freeradius: fails to run on amd64 Severity set to `serious'. tags 288547 +sarge +etch +sid Unknown tag/s: +etch, +sid. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore. Bug#288547: freeradius: fails to run on amd64 Tags were: help Tags added: sarge Thanks to a recent extension of lintian nonPIC checking to libraries Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#288547: New life in an old bug
severity 288547 serious tags 288547 +sarge +etch +sid Thanks to a recent extension of lintian nonPIC checking to libraries that the linker doesn't see, it seems that this bug is simply a libtool1.4 breakage, and _should_ affect any architecture that can't load nonPIC code in a shared object, rather than just AMD64. It only affects rlm_eap and rlm_eap_sim, that I can see, but it is probably present all the way back to their introduction to Debian. (rlm_eap_sim was enabled in 1.0.2-1, rlm_eap has been around for ages, but wouldn't have had this problem before rlm_eap_sim was introduced in 1.0.0, as that caused libeap to be split out of rlm_eap, and that's where this problem started.) The annoying part is that during the build, the library is fine and dandy. Then during make install libtool decides to slurp in libeap.a (non-PIC, static) instead of continuing to NEEDSing libeap.so (PIC, sharable) for rlm_eap.so and rlm_eap_sim.so. Since this bug was reported against 1.0.1-2, it's already part of Sarge's tree. And etch's, and sid's. Yuck! On the plus side, this means it shouldn't interfere with testing propagation. -- Paul TBBle Hampson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU Shorter .sig for a more eco-friendly paperless office. pgp0C8pKepLBp.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#320752: marked as done (sendmail not found)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:17:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#320752: fixed in cgiemail 1.6-28 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2005 09:05:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 01 02:05:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from p54add885.dip.t-dialin.net (io.jupitermon.de) [84.173.216.133] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DzWET-0006WM-00; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 02:05:14 -0700 Received: from nils by io.jupitermon.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DzWEL-0002L3-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 11:05:05 +0200 Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 11:05:05 +0200 From: Nils Bronstert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sendmail not found Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: cgiemail Version: 1.6-26 I have the same problem as someone reported before. After upgrading to Sarge cgiemail doesn't work anymore. The errormessage is sendmail not found. The path to sendmail seems to be not included in the binary of cgiemail when I'm looking for it with strings cgiemail. I think that cgiemail is not built correctly. The exact error message is: | No email was sent due to an error. | | 500 sendmail exit 127 with error message | | sh: line 1: sendmail: command not found Debian-version: Sarge kernel-image: 2.4.18-1-386 libc6: 2.3.2.ds1-22 Regards -- Nils Bronstert --- Received: (at 320752-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 22:18:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 15:18:42 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIZNJ-00047i-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:17:05 -0700 From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#320752: fixed in cgiemail 1.6-28 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:17:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: cgiemail Source-Version: 1.6-28 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cgiemail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cgiemail_1.6-28.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cgiemail/cgiemail_1.6-28.diff.gz cgiemail_1.6-28.dsc to pool/main/c/cgiemail/cgiemail_1.6-28.dsc cgiemail_1.6-28_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cgiemail/cgiemail_1.6-28_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated cgiemail package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:41:14 +0200 Source: cgiemail Binary: cgiemail Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.6-28 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: cgiemail - CGI Form-to-Mail converter Closes: 320752 Changes: cgiemail (1.6-28) unstable; urgency=high . * QA upload. * Explicitly set sendmail path to `/usr/sbin/sendmail'. Since it's not essential, configure wasn't able to find it on most auto-builders and defaulted to just `sendmail', which made the package unusable with the default PATH. Closes: #320752. Files: 86bcfc716bbc216f90cf08e6ad83b504 575 web optional
Bug#329711: gconf2-common: installation fails
Package: gconf2-common Version: 2.10.1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable trying to install gconf2-common resulted in the following error Unpacking gconf2-common (from .../gconf2-common_2.10.1-3_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/gconf2-common_2.10.1-3_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/sgml/gconf/gconf-1.0.dtd', which is also in package gconf2 dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289856: marked as done (mdnsresponder: Wrong license)
Your message dated Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:34:37 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line howl has been removed from Debian, closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2005 12:19:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 11 04:19:43 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (tsunami.hypair.net) [195.94.213.117] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CoKzu-0004xn-00; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:19:43 -0800 Received: from pe72.czempien.sdi.tpnet.pl (pe72.czempien.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.96.182.72]) by tsunami.hypair.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1336888EE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:18:48 +0100 (CET) From: Jakub Stachowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mdnsresponder: Wrong license Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:20:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.91 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: mdnsresponder Version: 0.9.8-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 *** Please type your report below this line *** copyright file installed along with mdnsresponder contains standard BSD license. Hovewer: 1) COPYING file from original source states that portions of code are covered by APSL 2.0. This is because howl package consists of forked Apple's mDNSResponder (covered by APSL) and Porchdog's client library covered by BSD 2) mdnsresponder package contains almost only APSL2-licensed code. Therefore installing BSD license into /usr/doc/mdnsresponder/copyright is completely wrong. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (50, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-rc3eng Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2) (ignored: LC_ALL set to pl_PL) Versions of packages mdnsresponder depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 289856-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 22:34:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 15:34:39 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIZeI-0001S5-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:34:39 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EIZeH-0004we-KY for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:34:37 +0200 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:34:37 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: howl has been removed from Debian, closing Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 I'm closing #289856, since the howl source package and all its binaries have been removed from the Debian archive a week ago (#302462). -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 Listening to: Mecano - Ya viene el sol Algebraic symbols are used when you do not know what you are talking about. -- Philippe Schnoebelen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Whoops
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 288547 +etch Bug#288547: freeradius: fails to run on amd64 Tags were: sarge help Tags added: etch tags 288547 +sid Bug#288547: freeradius: fails to run on amd64 Tags were: etch sarge help Tags added: sid Thankyou Mr Bug Control Robot Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329714: mkisofs segfault everytime
Package: mkisofs Version: 4:2.01+01a03-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When i try to create an image with this command, mkisofs segfault: mkisofs -v -R -r -J -V nom_cd -o disk.iso src/ Whent i try to burn a cd with k3b, mkisofs segfault. No problem if downgrading to mkisofs_4%3a2.01+01a01-4 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2gnumdk Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages mkisofs depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime mkisofs recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329715: gcc-4.0_4.0.1-9(powerpc/unstable): fails to build without deprecated BSD ptys
Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-9 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of gcc-4.0_4.0.1-9 on voltaire by sbuild/powerpc 65 Build started at 20050922-1710 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: dpkg-dev (= 1.13.9), libc6.1-dev (= 2.3.2.ds1-16) [alpha ia64] | libc0.3-dev (= 2.3.2.ds1-16) | libc0.1-dev (= 2.3.2.ds1-16) | libc12-dev (= 2.3.2.ds1-16) | libc6-dev (= 2.3.2.ds1-16), libc6-dev-sparc64 [sparc], libc6-dev-s390x [s390], libc6-dev-i386 [amd64] | ia32-libs-dev [amd64], libc6-dev-powerpc [ppc64], libc6-dev-ppc64 [powerpc], lib32gcc1 [amd64 ppc64], lib64gcc1 [i386 powerpc sparc s390], libc6-dev-amd64 [i386] | amd64-libs-dev (= 1.2) [i386], libunwind7-dev (= 0.98.5-6) [ia64], libatomic-ops-dev [ia64], m4, autoconf, automake1.9, libtool, autogen, gawk, dejagnu (= 1.4.3) [!hurd-any !hurd-i386], expect-tcl8.3 [hppa] | expect [hppa], expect (= 5.38.0) [!hppa !hurd-any !hurd-i386], bzip2, binutils (= 2.16.1) | binutils-multiarch (= 2.16.1), binutils-hppa64 (= 2.16.1) [hppa], debhelper (= 4.1), gperf (= 3.0.1), bison (= 1:1.875a-1), flex, gettext, texinfo (= 4.3), zlib1g-dev, libgc-dev [!avr !alpha !amd64 !arm !hppa !i386 !ia64 !m68k !mips !mipsel !powerpc !s390 !sparc !knetbsd-any !knetbsd-i386], gnat-4.0 [!alpha !arm !m68k !sh3 !sh3eb !sh4 !sh4eb !kfreebsd-any !knetbsd-any !netbsd-any !kfreebsd-i386 !knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386 !hurd-any !hurd-i386] | gnat-3.4 [!alpha !arm !m68k !sh3 !sh3eb !sh4 !sh4eb !kfreebsd-any !knetbsd-any !netbsd-any !kfreebsd-i386 !knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386 !hurd-any !hurd-i386] | gnat-3.3 [!alpha !arm !m68k !sh3 !sh3eb !sh4 !sh4eb !kfreebsd-any !knetbsd-any !netbsd-any !kfreebsd-i386 !knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386 !hurd-any !hurd-i386], libmpfr-dev [!m68k !avr], locales [!hurd-i386 !knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386 !hurd-any !knetbsd-any !netbsd-any], procps [!hurd-any !hurd-i386], sharutils, xlibs-dev [!mips !mipsel !knetbsd-any !netbsd-any !knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386], libgtk2.0-dev (= 2.4.4-2) [!mips !mipsel !knetbsd-any !netbsd-any !knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386], libart-2.0-dev [!mips !mipsel !knetbsd-any !netbsd-any !knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386], libcairo2-dev [!mips !mipsel !knetbsd-any !netbsd-any !knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386], realpath (= 1.9.12), chrpath, lsb-release, dash [hppa] [...] Will build the Fortran 95 compiler. Will build the Java compiler. Will not build the Pascal compiler: disabled for 4.0 Will build the Ada compiler. Will build the shared Ada libraries. Will build the Treelang compiler. Will build the FFI library. Will run the testsuite. Will run the testsuite with -m64: line 14: build/runcheck: cannot execute binary file device files /dev/pty* do not exist, the testsuite fail. please install the missing files: cd /dev ./MAKEDEV pty make[1]: *** [stamps/04-configure-stamp] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-4.0-4.0.1' make: *** [stamps/04-configure-stamp] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=powerpcpkg=gcc-4.0ver=4.0.1-9 /dev/pty* are only used with BSD style ptys. Linux 2.6 has named them as CONFIG_LEGACY_PTYS, to be removed at some point. Instead of looking for the old /dev/pty*, you should instead attempt to open a pty, and then close it, as this will also catch the case where /dev/pty* exists, but the support does not exist in the kernel. You could also look for a mounted /dev/pts filesystem and a valid /dev/ptmx, but I think opening a pty with the libC functions is probably best...
Bug#329714: marked as done (mkisofs segfault everytime)
Your message dated Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:49:16 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329714: mkisofs segfault everytime has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 22:47:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 15:47:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp3.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.28] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIZqQ-00051E-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:47:10 -0700 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0301.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B125E1C00558 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:46:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ANantes-252-1-76-101.w86-195.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.195.177.101]) by mwinf0301.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8BFAD1C00554; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:46:39 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bellegarde Cedric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mkisofs segfault everytime X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:47:24 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: mkisofs Version: 4:2.01+01a03-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When i try to create an image with this command, mkisofs segfault: mkisofs -v -R -r -J -V nom_cd -o disk.iso src/ Whent i try to burn a cd with k3b, mkisofs segfault. No problem if downgrading to mkisofs_4%3a2.01+01a01-4 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2gnumdk Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages mkisofs depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime mkisofs recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 329714-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 23:49:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 16:49:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from lump.einval.com (mail.einval.com) [217.147.81.17] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIaoa-00047k-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:49:21 -0700 Received: from sledge.mossbank.org.uk ([10.13.0.5] ident=Debian-exim) by mail.einval.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EIaoX-0001R1-00; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:49:17 +0100 Received: from steve by sledge.mossbank.org.uk with local (Exim 4.51) id 1EIaoW-0006WU-DW; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:49:16 +0100 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:49:16 +0100 From: Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bellegarde Cedric [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#329714: mkisofs segfault everytime Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=/e2eDi0V/xtL+Mc8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --/e2eDi0V/xtL+Mc8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Version: 4:2.01+01a03-2 On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:47:24AM +0200, Bellegarde Cedric wrote: Package: mkisofs Version: 4:2.01+01a03-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When i try to create an image with this command, mkisofs segfault: mkisofs -v -R -r -J -V nom_cd -o disk.iso src/ Whent i try to burn a cd with k3b, mkisofs segfault. No problem if downgrading to mkisofs_4%3a2.01+01a01-4 There's a fixed
Bug#329663: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'find'
severity 329663 wishlist
found 329663 1.2-4
thanks
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 04:45:53PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Package: fsh
Version: 1.2-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
fsh always returns the following error:
dixsept:~ fsh home
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/fsh, line 8, in ?
fsh.main()
File /usr/share/fsh/fsh.py, line 384, in main
if host.find('@') != -1:
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'find'
zsh: exit 1 fsh home
this behaviour is documented in the help for fsh:
$ fsh --help
fsh: usage: fsh [options] host command [args...]
hence you must supply a command. This behaviour is also not specific to
this version of fsh, or even to the debian package (likely it's been
around forever)
thanks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processed: Debian Kerberosish: r2107 - krb5/trunk/krb5/debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 329709 pending Bug#329709: libkrb53: Fails to link on powerpc There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'find'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 329663 wishlist Bug#329663: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'find' Severity set to `wishlist'. found 329663 1.2-4 Bug#329663: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'find' Bug marked as found in version 1.2-4. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329711: gconf2-common: May be a solution?
Package: gconf2-common Version: 2.10.1-3 Followup-For: Bug #329711 I had the same problem. I solved with a apt-get -f install I don't know if it's a solution, in that way I continued finely my upgrade. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages gconf2-common depends on: ii ucf 2.002 Update Configuration File: preserv gconf2-common recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328859: marked as done (very old package, should this be removed?)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:17:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#328859: fixed in safe-hole-perl 0.10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2005 18:16:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 17 11:16:34 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from shadowland.snow-crash.org (ned.snow-crash.org) [80.190.250.253] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGhEo-0006jH-00; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 11:16:34 -0700 Received: from nahar.localdomain (p83.129.8.89.tisdip.tiscali.de [83.129.8.89]) by ned.snow-crash.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C29335A3 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 20:16:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=nahar.localdomain) by nahar.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EGhEh-l0-C9 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 20:16:27 +0200 From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: very old package, should this be removed? Organization: CPU+Mainboard-FAQ: http://www.dch-faq.de/ Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 20:16:27 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: safe-hole-perl Version: 0.08-3.1 Severity: serious Hi, During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very long time could cover up some QA problems. I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I propose to remove it. There are very few users and though a new upstream release is available for some time, nobody has requested it yet. This usually means that your package matched some of the following criteria: [1] Your packages has not had a maintainer upload for more than three years. [2] has one or more RC bugs with no answer from the maintainer (**) [3] the state of your packages in general seems to indicate that you might be MIA [4] (if we propose a removal) it shows in popcon as having less than 100 users with the package installed. [5] the package was not released with sarge and at least ([1] and ( [2] or [3] or [4] or [5] )) was true. (**) The maintainer not answering to RC bugs refers to bugs filed more than one month before the time the check was performed. After 7 days without answer from you (the maintainer) we will reassign this bug to either WNPP (in case we propose to orphan it) or ftp.debian.org (in case we propose to remove it). The package will need an upload or an explanation for this action not to proceed. Please do *not* upload a package just to get off this list - it won't help the package at all. Maintainers should be responsive and feel responsible for their packages without needing other people to force them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users. Thanks! Marc --- Received: (at 328859-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2005 00:18:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 17:18:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIbFW-00016y-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:17:10 -0700 From: Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#328859: fixed in safe-hole-perl 0.10-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:17:10 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: safe-hole-perl Source-Version: 0.10-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of safe-hole-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
Bug#329724: gconf2-common: fails to install
Package: gconf2-common Version: 2.10.1-3 Severity: grave On my autobuilder, during the installation of gconf2-common: ... Setting up gconf2-common (2.10.1-3) ... Creating config file /etc/gconf/2/path with new version cp: cannot create regular file `/etc/gconf/2/path': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing gconf2-common (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgconf2-4: libgconf2-4 depends on gconf2-common (= 2.10.1-3); however: Package gconf2-common is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libgconf2-4 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of gconf2: gconf2 depends on libgconf2-4 (= 2.9); however: Package libgconf2-4 is not configured yet. gconf2 depends on gconf2-common (= 2.10.1-3); however: Package gconf2-common is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing gconf2 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured ... -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.4-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329711: marked as done (gconf2-common: installation fails)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:47:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329711: fixed in gconf2 2.10.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 22:39:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 15:39:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 201-42-113-142.dsl.telesp.net.br (localhost.localdomain) [201.42.113.142] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIZj1-0003Ck-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:39:31 -0700 Received: from rafael by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EIZke-0006Pk-RW; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 19:41:12 -0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?utf-8?q?Rafael_=C3=81vila_de_Esp=C3=ADndola?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gconf2-common: installation fails X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 19:41:12 -0300 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gconf2-common Version: 2.10.1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable trying to install gconf2-common resulted in the following error Unpacking gconf2-common (from .../gconf2-common_2.10.1-3_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/gconf2-common_2.10.1-3_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/sgml/gconf/gconf-1.0.dtd', which is also in package gconf2 dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 329711-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2005 00:50:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 17:50:43 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIbiV-0005Fy-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:47:07 -0700 From: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329711: fixed in gconf2 2.10.1-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:47:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: gconf2 Source-Version: 2.10.1-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gconf2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gconf2-common_2.10.1-4_all.deb to pool/main/g/gconf2/gconf2-common_2.10.1-4_all.deb gconf2_2.10.1-4.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gconf2/gconf2_2.10.1-4.diff.gz gconf2_2.10.1-4.dsc to pool/main/g/gconf2/gconf2_2.10.1-4.dsc gconf2_2.10.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gconf2/gconf2_2.10.1-4_i386.deb libgconf2-4_2.10.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gconf2/libgconf2-4_2.10.1-4_i386.deb libgconf2-dev_2.10.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gconf2/libgconf2-dev_2.10.1-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gconf2 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 02:23:49 +0200 Source: gconf2 Binary: libgconf2-4 gconf2 gconf2-common libgconf2-dev Architecture: source i386 all Version: 2.10.1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Josselin
Bug#327939: marked as done (qbrew: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:17:15 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327939: fixed in qbrew 0.3.5-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:47:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:47:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEy1f-0003TA-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:47:51 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEy1d-0002TU-Fi for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:49 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: qbrew: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:49 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: qbrew Version: 0.3.4-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hello, This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this library has moved to the libqt3-mt package. Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate the Qt/KDE transition to testing. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm, m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail. Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking! P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I apologize for the inconvenience. --- Received: (at 327939-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2005 01:18:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 18:18:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIcBf-rp-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:17:15 -0700 From: Tobias Toedter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327939: fixed in qbrew 0.3.5-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:17:15 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: qbrew Source-Version: 0.3.5-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of qbrew, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: qbrew_0.3.5-1.diff.gz to pool/main/q/qbrew/qbrew_0.3.5-1.diff.gz qbrew_0.3.5-1.dsc to pool/main/q/qbrew/qbrew_0.3.5-1.dsc qbrew_0.3.5-1_i386.deb to pool/main/q/qbrew/qbrew_0.3.5-1_i386.deb qbrew_0.3.5.orig.tar.gz
Bug#329726: gnome-blog-poster doesn't work any more
Package: gnome-blog Version: 0.8-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable gnome-blog-poster crashes when run: $ gnome-blog-poster /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gnome/vfs.py:4: DeprecationWarning: Module gnome.vfs is deprecated; please import gnomevfs instead DeprecationWarning) Using gconf_prefix /apps/gnome-blog Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/gnome-blog-poster, line 52, in ? app = BloggerApp() File /usr/bin/gnome-blog-poster, line 35, in __init__ on_entry_posted=self._onEntryPosted) File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gnomeblog/blog_poster.py, line 37, in __init__ self.blogEntry = rich_entry.RichEntry() File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gnomeblog/rich_entry.py, line 21, in __init__ self.set_editable(TRUE) NameError: global name 'TRUE' is not defined -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-386 Locale: LANG=es_DO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_DO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gnome-blog depends on: ii gconf22.10.1-2 GNOME configuration database syste ii python2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o ii python-gnome2 2.10.0-2 Python bindings for the GNOME desk ii python-gnome2-extras 2.10.0-4 Python bindings for the GNOME desk gnome-blog recommends no packages. -- debconf-show failed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329728: gnome-blog-poster crashes when run
Package: gnome-blog Version: 0.8-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable $ gnome-blog-poster /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gnome/vfs.py:4: DeprecationWarning: Module gnome.vfs is deprecated; please import gnomevfs instead DeprecationWarning) Using gconf_prefix /apps/gnome-blog Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/gnome-blog-poster, line 52, in ? app = BloggerApp() File /usr/bin/gnome-blog-poster, line 35, in __init__ on_entry_posted=self._onEntryPosted) File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gnomeblog/blog_poster.py, line 37, in __init__ self.blogEntry = rich_entry.RichEntry() File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gnomeblog/rich_entry.py, line 21, in __init__ self.set_editable(TRUE) NameError: global name 'TRUE' is not defined -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-386 Locale: LANG=es_DO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_DO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gnome-blog depends on: ii gconf22.10.1-2 GNOME configuration database syste ii python2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o ii python-gnome2 2.10.0-2 Python bindings for the GNOME desk ii python-gnome2-extras 2.10.0-4 Python bindings for the GNOME desk gnome-blog recommends no packages. -- debconf-show failed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328192: FTBFS: Missing sentinel in function call
Rhythmbox Applet 0.1.8 is now out, which fixes this bug upstream. http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~kuliniew/rhythmbox-applet/downloads/rhythmbox-applet-0.1.8.tar.gz signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#326453: libtrash segfault caused by getwc
Hi there!
This bug also appears when using the latest libtrash (2.3).
I asked gdb, and gdb said it's getwc's fault. A short code
fragment confirms this suspicion:
#include stdio.h
#include wchar.h
int main (void) {
FILE *fp = fopen(/dev/null, r);
wint_t w = getwc(fp);
return 0;
}
This does segfault, too (even when you read from an existing,
non-empty file).
I waded somewhat through the glibc code, but all I could deduce
from that tangled mess was that, apparently, some bits in the FILE
struct are not set as they should be.
Greetings,
-- Jorgen
--
((email . [EMAIL PROTECTED]) (www . http://www.forcix.cx/;)
(gpg . 1024D/028AF63C) (irc . nick forcer on IRCnet))
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
