New package checkmp3 ???
I ran dselect, and lo and behold, checkmp3 appeared. A package with the same name, similar version number (1.97.3 vs. 1.97.2), same description and same maintainer as mp3check. This is bad - should I file a bug on f.d.o, mp3check, checkmp3, or all the above? -- David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org And crawling, on the planet's face, some insects called the human race. Lost in space, lost in time, and meaning. -- RHPS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New package checkmp3 ???
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 04:16:05PM -0500, David Starner wrote: I ran dselect, and lo and behold, checkmp3 appeared. A package with the same name, similar version number (1.97.3 vs. 1.97.2), same description and same maintainer as mp3check. This is bad - should I file a bug on f.d.o, mp3check, checkmp3, or all the above? How about mailing the maintainer to ask whats up? -- Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Windows: the world's first commercially successful virus! - Debian GNU/Linux Ooohh You are missing out! pgpDvpmayIUfK.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: New package checkmp3 ???
David Starner wrote: I ran dselect, and lo and behold, checkmp3 appeared. A package with the same name, similar version number (1.97.3 vs. 1.97.2), same description and same maintainer as mp3check. This is bad - should I file a bug on f.d.o, mp3check, checkmp3, or all the above? AFAIK, there was discussion about different packages with binary executables called mp3check and mp3-check, respectively. The maintainers agreed to rename one package (I believe mp3-check is the one in checkmp3). The old mp3check was to be removed from the archive, but there will be probably another one (different from the former, of course). Ulf Disclaimer: I'm not a maintainer of any mp3 check package ;-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New package checkmp3 ???
* David Starner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I ran dselect, and lo and behold, checkmp3 appeared. A package with the same name, similar version number (1.97.3 vs. 1.97.2), same description and same maintainer as mp3check. This is bad - should I file a bug on f.d.o, mp3check, checkmp3, or all the above? Take a look at bug #71016, mp3check will removed from the ftp archive and will be replaced with a program that is really called mp3check (the binary in my package is mp3_check). I renamed it to checkmp3, because mp3-check would be too confusing. Regards/Gruesse, Norbert -- Norbert Tretkowski pgpcVXK8WYEI5.pgp Description: PGP signature
