Re: News about the debhelper toolchain
Hideki Yamane: > On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 21:37:05 +0100 > Niels Thykier wrote: >> Remember to *remove* "--with python3" from d/rules as well. An explicit >> "--with python3" will cause issues with Build-Depends-Indep and other >> conditional usage (e.g. build-profiles). > > And does lintian warns it? > > Not sure; I have not tracked the lintian side of things. Though if it does not, please file a bug against lintian. ~Niels
Re: News about the debhelper toolchain
On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 21:37:05 +0100 Niels Thykier wrote: > Remember to *remove* "--with python3" from d/rules as well. An explicit > "--with python3" will cause issues with Build-Depends-Indep and other > conditional usage (e.g. build-profiles). And does lintian warns it? -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.org/iijmio-mail.jp
Re: News about the debhelper toolchain
Hideki Yamane: > On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 15:38:14 +0100 > Niels Thykier wrote: >> * The "dh-sequence- build-dependency" to replace the >>"--with " parameter to dh in the debian/rules. >>- Note that third-party add-ons may not have added the relevant >> Provides to support this change. > > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10~), dh-python3, > ↓ > Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 12), > Build-Depends-Indep: dh-sequence-python3, > > like this? > > Yes, this is now possible in general. :) I have not tested concretely whether dh-sequence-python3 supports being put into Build-Depends-Indep (but it probably does). Remember to *remove* "--with python3" from d/rules as well. An explicit "--with python3" will cause issues with Build-Depends-Indep and other conditional usage (e.g. build-profiles). ~Niels
Re: News about the debhelper toolchain
On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 15:38:14 +0100 Niels Thykier wrote: > * The "dh-sequence- build-dependency" to replace the >"--with " parameter to dh in the debian/rules. >- Note that third-party add-ons may not have added the relevant > Provides to support this change. Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10~), dh-python3, ↓ Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 12), Build-Depends-Indep: dh-sequence-python3, like this? -- Hideki Yamane
Re: News about the debhelper toolchain
Paul Wise: > On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 2:39 PM Niels Thykier wrote: > >> * debhelper generate a temporary writable directory for $HOME >>and $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR plus clear all remaining XDG_* variables. >>This simplifies packaging of tools that insist on writing to >>$HOME. > > What is the right approach for disabling this locally (in > sbuild/pbuilder rather than in the package) in case someone wants to > detect and fix such problems rather than papering over them with this > workaround? > Currently, there is no way do this for package using compat 13. I am happy to review patches for adding such a feature (e.g. via DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS).
Re: News about the debhelper toolchain, challenge
On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 03:08:32AM +, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 2:39 PM Niels Thykier wrote: > > > * Support for new execute_before_X and execute_after_X targets. > > Some folks on IRC mentioned that the shorter before_X/after_X would > have been preferred by them. Feel free to challange "Some folks on IRC" to create a patch.
Re: News about the debhelper toolchain
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 2:39 PM Niels Thykier wrote: > * Support for new execute_before_X and execute_after_X targets. Some folks on IRC mentioned that the shorter before_X/after_X would have been preferred by them. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Re: News about the debhelper toolchain
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 2:39 PM Niels Thykier wrote: > * debhelper generate a temporary writable directory for $HOME >and $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR plus clear all remaining XDG_* variables. >This simplifies packaging of tools that insist on writing to >$HOME. What is the right approach for disabling this locally (in sbuild/pbuilder rather than in the package) in case someone wants to detect and fix such problems rather than papering over them with this workaround? -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
