Re: Diversion of APT tools by dpkg-cross (apt-get,apt-cache,apt-config)
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 21.49, Raphael Bossek wrote: Message was signed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Key ID: 0x376941AB835EB2FF). Warning: The signature is bad. Something's broken somewhere... Can anybody confirm so I can stop worrying about my set up? thanks -- vbi -- Press CTRL-ALT-DEL to continue pgp0QNAB8PiAc.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bad Sig (was: Re: Diversion of APT tools by dpkg-cross (apt-get,apt-cache,apt-config))
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 10:21, Adrian von Bidder wrote: On Tuesday 01 February 2005 21.49, Raphael Bossek wrote: Message was signed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Key ID: 0x376941AB835EB2FF). Warning: The signature is bad. Something's broken somewhere... Can anybody confirm so I can stop worrying about my set up? Me too, but I noticed an escaped From in the message and didn't investigate further. Regards, David # -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bad Sig (was: Re: Diversion of APT tools by dpkg-cross (apt-get,apt-cache,apt-config))
Hi David! You wrote: Message was signed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Key ID: 0x376941AB835EB2FF). Warning: The signature is bad. Something's broken somewhere... Can anybody confirm so I can stop worrying about my set up? Me too, but I noticed an escaped From in the message and didn't investigate further. AFAIK, gpg signs the body only. Anyway, sig is bad here, too. -- Kind regards, ++ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | || Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | ++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bad Sig (was: Re: Diversion of APT tools by dpkg-cross (apt-get,apt-cache,apt-config))
Op wo, 02-02-2005 te 13:53 +0100, schreef Bas Zoetekouw: Hi David! Me too, but I noticed an escaped From in the message and didn't investigate further. AFAIK, gpg signs the body only. Yes, but a leading 'From' on a line will be escaped to 'From' in transit. This is because some software will otherwise interpret the leading from to be the start of a new message (it's a bit too close to the mbox format start) -- Wouter Verhelst NixSys BVBA Louizastraat 14, 2800 Mechelen T:+32 15 27 69 50 / F:+32 15 27 60 51 / M:+32 486 836 198 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
good signature... Re: Diversion of APT tools by dpkg-cross (apt-get,apt-cache,apt-config)
Hi, On Wednesday 02 February 2005 10:21, Adrian von Bidder wrote: Warning: The signature is bad. Something's broken somewhere... Can anybody confirm so I can stop worrying about my set up? I cannot confirm this, the signature is valid here. I have no valid trust path to the key, but that's another issue... regards, Holger pgpwQiiQLJP3U.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bad Sig (was: Re: Diversion of APT tools by dpkg-cross (apt-get,apt-cache,apt-config))
* Wouter Verhelst [Wed, 02 Feb 2005 14:15:35 +0100]: Op wo, 02-02-2005 te 13:53 +0100, schreef Bas Zoetekouw: Hi David! Me too, but I noticed an escaped From in the message and didn't investigate further. AFAIK, gpg signs the body only. Yes, but a leading 'From' on a line will be escaped to 'From' in transit. This is because some software will otherwise interpret the leading from to be the start of a new message (it's a bit too close to the mbox format start) /me hugs mutt's $encode_from. -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 As an adolescent I aspired to lasting fame, I craved factual certainty, and I thirsted for a meaningful vision of human life -- so I became a scientist. This is like becoming an archbishop so you can meet girls. -- Matt Cartmill -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Diversion of APT tools by dpkg-cross (apt-get,apt-cache,apt-config)
Raphael Bossek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, I'm a active member of the dpkg-cross package part of the www.emdebian.org project. A long outstanding feature request was to support APT for dpkg-cross. The realisation result in diversion of apt-get, apt-cache and apt-config which is our CVS pending for a new release to experimental as soon as the APT wrapper is stable. The Debian Policy Manaual advice me to discuss this diversion here. Please feel free to comment the consequences of this diversion. dpkg-cross provide a extension for apt-get, apt-cache and apt-config with the command line option -a|--arch where your cross-host architecture can be specified. This arch is by default your architecture your are developing for using a cross-compiler suite. If no architecture (-a|--arch) is specified the original implemenations apt-get, apt-cache and apt-config are executed instead so nothink changes for those uses who do not use this extension. From my point of view the extension of the APT tools by diversion do not break today functionality. It was one gole not to break today functionality! -- Raphael Bossek We were thinking of using -a|--arch for multiarch support in the future to tell apt to prefer a certain architecture on install. apt-get -a i386 install bash zsh screen ... instead of the longer apt-get install bash:i386 zsh:i386 screen:i386 ... MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Diversion of APT tools by dpkg-cross (apt-get,apt-cache,apt-config)
On Tuesday, Feb 1, 2005, Raphael Bossek writes: Hi, I'm a active member of the dpkg-cross package part of the www.emdebian.org project. A long outstanding feature request was to support APT for dpkg-cross. The realisation result in diversion of apt-get, apt-cache and apt-config which is our CVS pending for a new release to experimental as soon as the APT wrapper is stable. The Debian Policy Manaual advice me to discuss this diversion here. Please feel free to comment the consequences of this diversion. dpkg-cross provide a extension for apt-get, apt-cache and apt-config with the command line option -a|--arch where your cross-host architecture can be specified. This arch is by default your architecture your are developing for using a cross-compiler suite. If no architecture (-a|--arch) is specified the original implemenations apt-get, apt-cache and apt-config are executed instead so nothink changes for those uses who do not use this extension. From my point of view the extension of the APT tools by diversion do not break today functionality. It was one gole not to break today functionality! -- Raphael Bossek I think that -a is only really useful if you can also easily specify the --root option to dpkg. Right now the only way to get apt to do this is by modifying some of the Dir:: variables and wedging --root= into the Dpkg::options and... well, it's less than trivial. So some way to do that would be a good idea, I think. Just my .02 from trying to get apt and apt-build to work with dpkg-cross awhile back. --pj -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Diversion of APT tools by dpkg-cross (apt-get,apt-cache,apt-config)
Hi Paul, I think that -a is only really useful if you can also easily specify the --root option to dpkg. We use dpkg-cross as wrapper for installation. dpkg --root is not required for this APT wrapper. So some way to do that would be a good idea, I think. The APT wrapper is used to installed foreign architecture's packages and all their dependencies with dpkg-cross without have to bother with it manually. Of course, the other APT functions are available too: source, build-deps etc. Just my .02 from trying to get apt and apt-build to work with dpkg-cross awhile back. The apt-build tools works after some tweaks with this APT wrapper. I intent to publish the minor modification on apt-build in the next weaks, I hope. -- Raphael Bossek -- 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
