Re: libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev

1998-10-10 Thread Ben Gertzfield
 Ole == Ole J Tetlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Ole Is there an easy way to have both libgtk-dev and
Ole libgtk1.1-dev available? I have trouble with yagirc and
Ole libgtk1.1. It compiles but I get a sigsegv when I try to run
Ole it. I was hoping that linking with libgtk (stable) would fix
Ole it, but I need gtk-1.1 for balsa.

You cannot have libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev installed at the
same time, but you don't need to.

You can, however, have libgtk1 and libgtk1.1-dev and libgtk1.1
installed at the same time.

-- 
Brought to you by the letters T and K and the number 2.
It is sad. *Campers* cannot *dance*. Not even a *party*. -- Orz, SCII
Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/
I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.



Re: libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev

1998-10-10 Thread Martin Schulze
Ben Gertzfield wrote:
 Ole Is there an easy way to have both libgtk-dev and
 Ole libgtk1.1-dev available? I have trouble with yagirc and
 Ole libgtk1.1. It compiles but I get a sigsegv when I try to run
 Ole it. I was hoping that linking with libgtk (stable) would fix
 Ole it, but I need gtk-1.1 for balsa.
 
 You cannot have libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev installed at the
 same time, but you don't need to.

gnotepad+ does not work with gtk 1.1 while many application that come
with Debian are linked against 1.1.  Thus you can't compile gnotepad+
on that machine.

Regards,

Joey

PS: I compiled gnotepad+ on a 2nd machine with only gtk 1.0 and
all id did was to segfault.

-- 
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct,
not tried it.  -- Donald E. Knuth



Re: libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev

1998-10-10 Thread Ben Gertzfield
 Martin == Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Ben You cannot have libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev installed at the
Ben same time, but you don't need to.

Martin gnotepad+ does not work with gtk 1.1 while many
Martin application that come with Debian are linked against 1.1.
Martin Thus you can't compile gnotepad+ on that machine.

Sure, but you can always remove libgtk1.1-dev and install libgtk-dev.

-- 
Brought to you by the letters A and Y and the number 16.
Mmm.. incapacitating.. -- Homer Simpson
Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/
I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.



Re: libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev

1998-10-10 Thread Martin Schulze
Ben Gertzfield wrote:
  Martin == Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Ben You cannot have libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev installed at the
 Ben same time, but you don't need to.
 
 Martin gnotepad+ does not work with gtk 1.1 while many
 Martin application that come with Debian are linked against 1.1.
 Martin Thus you can't compile gnotepad+ on that machine.
 
 Sure, but you can always remove libgtk1.1-dev and install libgtk-dev.

Won't it hurt if I leave libgtk1.1 installed?

Regards,

Joey

-- 
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct,
not tried it.  -- Donald E. Knuth



Re: libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev

1998-10-10 Thread Ben Gertzfield
 Martin == Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Martin gnotepad+ does not work with gtk 1.1 while many
Martin application that come with Debian are linked against 1.1.
Martin Thus you can't compile gnotepad+ on that machine.

Ben Sure, but you can always remove libgtk1.1-dev and install
Ben libgtk-dev.

Martin Won't it hurt if I leave libgtk1.1 installed?

No; that's like leaving libc5 and libc6 installed. It's no big deal.

-- 
Brought to you by the letters B and W and the number 11.
Bill Gates is a talented evil man. -- Chip Salzenberg
Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/
I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.



Re: libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev

1998-10-10 Thread Martin Schulze
Ben Gertzfield wrote:
  Martin == Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Martin gnotepad+ does not work with gtk 1.1 while many
 Martin application that come with Debian are linked against 1.1.
 Martin Thus you can't compile gnotepad+ on that machine.
 
 Ben Sure, but you can always remove libgtk1.1-dev and install
 Ben libgtk-dev.
 
 Martin Won't it hurt if I leave libgtk1.1 installed?
 
 No; that's like leaving libc5 and libc6 installed. It's no big deal.

Hmm, so I have 1.1 installed as well as 1.0-dev.  Now if I compile,
I compile against 1.0.  So it's dynamically linked against 1.0.
But 1.0 is not installed and even conflicts with 1.1.

Something's wrong here...

Regards,

Joey

-- 
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct,
not tried it.  -- Donald E. Knuth



Re: libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev

1998-10-10 Thread Ben Gertzfield
 Martin == Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Martin Hmm, so I have 1.1 installed as well as 1.0-dev.  Now if I
Martin compile, I compile against 1.0.  So it's dynamically
Martin linked against 1.0.  But 1.0 is not installed and even
Martin conflicts with 1.1.

libgtk 1.0 does not conflict with 1.1. libgtk-dev 1.0 does.

You must have 1.0 installed to have 1.0-dev installed, so the
complaint is kind of moot :)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/gtk]% dpkg --info libgtk-dev_1.0.6-2_i386.deb |
*snip*
 Package: libgtk-dev
 Version: 1:1.0.6-2
 Section: devel
 Priority: optional
 Architecture: i386
 Depends: libgtk1 (= 1:1.0.6)
 Suggests: libgtk-doc
 Replaces: libgtk1 ( 1:1.0.4)

Ben 

-- 
Brought to you by the letters C and G and the number 15.
Son, I am able, she said, though you scare me. -- They Might Be Giants
Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/
I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.



Re: libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev

1998-10-10 Thread Martin Schulze
Ben Gertzfield wrote:
  Martin == Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Martin Hmm, so I have 1.1 installed as well as 1.0-dev.  Now if I
 Martin compile, I compile against 1.0.  So it's dynamically
 Martin linked against 1.0.  But 1.0 is not installed and even
 Martin conflicts with 1.1.
 
 libgtk 1.0 does not conflict with 1.1. libgtk-dev 1.0 does.
 
 You must have 1.0 installed to have 1.0-dev installed, so the
 complaint is kind of moot :)

Sorry, I was theoretically blubbering.

Thanks for the clarfication.

Like I sais, something was wrong, my brain.

Regards,

Joey

-- 
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct,
not tried it.  -- Donald E. Knuth



Re: libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev

1998-10-10 Thread aqy6633
 Is there an easy way to have both libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev
 available? I have trouble with yagirc and libgtk1.1. It
 compiles but I get a sigsegv when I try to run it. I was
 hoping that linking with libgtk (stable) would fix it, but I
 need gtk-1.1 for balsa.

Yes, you can. I have gtk-1.1 installed in /usr/local and the only trick is to
have /usr/local/bin FIRST in the PATH when compiling with 1.1 (gtk-config
would invoke the one in /usr/local/bin) and not to have /usr/local/bin in 
PATH at all when compiling with gtk-1.0 (gtk-config is in the /usr/bin).


Alex Y.
-- 
   _ 
 _( )_
( (o___   +---+
 |  _ 7   |Alexander Yukhimets|
  \()|   http://pages.nyu.edu/~aqy6633/  |
  / \ \   +---+