Re: neat mutt bug.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 01:42:04PM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:17:37AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person into thinking Branden actually signed this. except for that long pause for the signature checking itself that was conspicously missing. Only long for some keys on my computer. (When it doesn't find keys I think.) After a while I realized it wasn't in Swedish as it usually is, though. An advantage of localization :) -- Niklas
Re: neat mutt bug.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:17:37AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Sep 16 03:12:37 2001) --] gpg: Signature made Thu Sep 13 20:30:20 2001 PDT using DSA key ID 2B46A27C gpg: Good signature from Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: aka Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: Fingerprint: 1573 D544 73C3 988F 0096 3E4F EA4C 661F 2B46 A27C [-- End of PGP output --] [-- The following data is signed --] Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person into thinking Branden actually signed this. [-- End of signed data --] /me has a heart attack -- G. Branden Robinson| Yesterday upon the stair, Debian GNU/Linux | I met a man who wasn't there. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | He wasn't there again today, http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | I think he's from the CIA. pgpMFSzjWNHDk.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: neat mutt bug.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:17:37AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person into thinking Branden actually signed this. except for that long pause for the signature checking itself that was conspicously missing. -john
Re: neat mutt bug.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 01:42:04PM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:17:37AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person into thinking Branden actually signed this. except for that long pause for the signature checking itself that was conspicously missing. Only if you have a slow computer :) I had to watch closely to notice the lack of a GPG verification on it.. Daniel -- / Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---\ | The problem with LaTeX is that your answers | |look so good, you think they *must* be right! | | -- Thomas Banchoff | \- The Turtle Moves! -- http://www.lspace.org /
Re: neat mutt bug.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 05:06:33PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 01:42:04PM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: I had to watch closely to notice the lack of a GPG verification on it.. As long as you don't miss the 's' in the tagline. Michael
neat mutt bug.
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Sep 16 03:12:37 2001) --] gpg: Signature made Thu Sep 13 20:30:20 2001 PDT using DSA key ID 2B46A27C gpg: Good signature from Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: aka Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: Fingerprint: 1573 D544 73C3 988F 0096 3E4F EA4C 661F 2B46 A27C [-- End of PGP output --] [-- The following data is signed --] Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person into thinking Branden actually signed this. [-- End of signed data --] --Adam -- Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: neat mutt bug.
also sprach Adam McKenna (on Sun, 16 Sep 2001 03:17:37AM -0700): Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person into thinking Branden actually signed this. oooh. this is ugly. reported it to bugtraq? if not bugtraq, then at least michael elkins should know... martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \ echo mailto: !#^.*|tr * mailto:; [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- the web site you seek cannot be located but endless others exist. pgp0zVwlqExAf.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: neat mutt bug.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 12:34:22PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote: also sprach Adam McKenna (on Sun, 16 Sep 2001 03:17:37AM -0700): Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person into thinking Branden actually signed this. oooh. this is ugly. reported it to bugtraq? if not bugtraq, then at least michael elkins should know... I just sent a copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED], hopefully that list accepts submissions from non-members. I personally don't think it's bugtraq worthy, since careful checking will reveal a bad date, but still, it's important because the casual reader will most likely believe the data was signed. --Adam -- Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: neat mutt bug.
Previously Adam McKenna wrote: Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person into thinking Branden actually signed this. That's documented, nothing special about it. Wichert. -- _ / Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Re: neat mutt bug.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 02:33:29PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: That's documented Where?
Re: neat mutt bug.
Previously Aaron Lehmann wrote: Where? Euh, the manual I guess? I know I read it somewhere. Wichert. -- _ / Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
