Re: Suggestions for remote server monitoring

2005-01-05 Thread John Barton


   What software would people recommend for remotely monitoring a server? I'm 
not talking about intrustion detection and whatnot, just keeping an eye on 
things like CPU load, memory, bandwidth usage, etc. Bonus points if it uses 
something like RRD--graphs and charts are not just pretty eyecandy for me.
If you want to monitor resources on a remote system, try cacti. It has 
great graphing capability using RRD. One of my favorite features is 
being able to highlight a section of your graph and have it draw a new 
graph to zoom in on the area of concern.

--
John Barton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Suggestions for remote server monitoring

2005-01-05 Thread Upayavira
Jacob S wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:50:24 +0300
Peter Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

   What software would people recommend for remotely monitoring a
   server? I'm 
not talking about intrustion detection and whatnot, just keeping an
eye on things like CPU load, memory, bandwidth usage, etc. Bonus
points if it uses something like RRD--graphs and charts are not just
pretty eyecandy for me.
   

apt-cache show nagios
Nagios will keep track of all your services - from http, to e-mail, to
ftp, etc. as well as the number of running processes, disk usage, etc.
It will also e-mail you when it sees a problem. It has a webpage admin
interface that's pretty informative. The only thing I think it doesn't
do is monitor bandwidth for you; that would require a different program.
 

If you have access to the data, it isn't hard to extend Nagios to handle 
custom monitoring tasks. Just write a script that returns a status code 
and some text.

We have been using it for several servers at work for a while with good
success.
 

Likewise.
Regards, Upayavira
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Suggestions for remote server monitoring

2005-01-05 Thread Philipp Kern
On 5 Jan 2005, at 14:29, John Barton wrote:
If you want to monitor resources on a remote system, try cacti. It has 
great graphing capability using RRD. One of my favorite features is 
being able to highlight a section of your graph and have it draw a new 
graph to zoom in on the area of concern.
Has anyone got cacti running with Exim mailserver statistics?
Regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Suggestions for remote server monitoring

2005-01-04 Thread Jacob S
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:50:24 +0300
Peter Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 What software would people recommend for remotely monitoring a
 server? I'm 
 not talking about intrustion detection and whatnot, just keeping an
 eye on things like CPU load, memory, bandwidth usage, etc. Bonus
 points if it uses something like RRD--graphs and charts are not just
 pretty eyecandy for me.

apt-cache show nagios

Nagios will keep track of all your services - from http, to e-mail, to
ftp, etc. as well as the number of running processes, disk usage, etc.
It will also e-mail you when it sees a problem. It has a webpage admin
interface that's pretty informative. The only thing I think it doesn't
do is monitor bandwidth for you; that would require a different program.

We have been using it for several servers at work for a while with good
success.

HTH,
Jacob


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Suggestions for remote server monitoring

2005-01-04 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Peter Clark said:
 What software would people recommend for remotely monitoring a server? 
 I'm 
 not talking about intrustion detection and whatnot, just keeping an eye on 
 things like CPU load, memory, bandwidth usage, etc. Bonus points if it uses 
 something like RRD--graphs and charts are not just pretty eyecandy for me.

munin for local tests, nagios for the network ones.  There is some overlap
- munin can do network tests, but it seems they are best suited in those
realms, at least so far.  munin lacks the ability to directly alert an
admin of a problem (although it can alert via nagios).  nagios lacks
decent graphing tools, while munin makes pretty RRD-graphs.

HTH,
-- 
 -
|   ,''`.Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
 -


pgpr8E5UjhLLk.pgp
Description: PGP signature