Re: RANT about fonts with KDE Updates

2006-09-12 Thread Andy Parkins
On Saturday 2006 September 09 20:02, Alejandro Exojo wrote:

 Well, it seems that this will be selectable soon:
 http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-develm=115651723700985w=2

Which said:

Since X by default computes real DPI and we just use it, while GNOME 
forces it to 96DPI, we get a lot of KDE has ugly fonts, despite us doing 
things properly. Go figure.

I have to say, I've been a correct-DPI stickler since I began using X and have 
never had ugly fonts for which my DPI setting was the problem.  I wonder if 
the ugly fonts are not due to some other mis-configuration like 
anti-aliasing not working rather than DPI.

It's such a shame that KDE isn't being lauded for being sensible and GNOME/MS 
ridiculed.  In particular on Windows; most people with fancy, high resolution 
displays can't read the text on them because they can't change DPI without 
rendering every dialog box useless.

What on earth is the meaning of the term dots per inch when it is fixed at 96?  
I suggest renaming it to RDR (Random Dot Ratio).


Andy

-- 
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIEE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgpr257uXmvSF.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: RANT about fonts with KDE Updates

2006-09-09 Thread Andy Parkins
On Saturday 2006, September 09 06:08, Paul Johnson wrote:

 I've never had this problem and I run sid.  I don't use the same fonts as
 the theme I use though, seems like some of the theme defaults could have a
 slightly more visible choices.  I may be correctable to 20/20, but that
 doesn't mean I can read flyspeck 3 at a comfortable distance from the
 monitor.

In that case your X server DPI is probably wrong.  Try removing the forced DPI 
override in /etc/kde3/kdmrc, and X will have a go at reading your monitor 
size from the monitor.  If it can't you can always set it manually with 
the DisplaySize option in /etc/X11/xorg.conf's Monitor section.

It's a bit of hassle to set up, but I really recommend putting the effort in.

KDE is the only desktop that seems to respect DPI size, GNOME has taken the 
crazy MS route of saying all displays are 96dpi.  The advantage is that you 
can use the same KDE settings on different computers, and always have the 
fonts come out at a comfortable size for you.

$ xdpyinfo
screen #0:
  dimensions:1680x1050 pixels (331x212 millimeters)
  resolution:129x126 dots per inch

I have KDE fonts set to 8 point.  If the DPI is wrong for my monitor 
(sometimes it's forced to 75 dpi in kdmrc) this is completely unreadable.

For example, a target 8pts would be about 4pts or 1.4 mm high on screen 
instead of the 2.8mm it should be.  Who on earth would think that's readable?  
Why is KDE the only sane desktop in the land? :-)


Andy

-- 
Dr Andrew Parkins, M Eng (Hons), AMIEE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgpdM1o46C5yB.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: RANT about fonts with KDE Updates

2006-09-09 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Samstag 09 September 2006 11:02 schrieb Andy Parkins:
 On Saturday 2006, September 09 06:08, Paul Johnson wrote:
  I've never had this problem and I run sid.  I don't use the same fonts as
  the theme I use though, seems like some of the theme defaults could have
  a slightly more visible choices.  I may be correctable to 20/20, but that
  doesn't mean I can read flyspeck 3 at a comfortable distance from the
  monitor.

 In that case your X server DPI is probably wrong.  Try removing the forced
 DPI override in /etc/kde3/kdmrc, and X will have a go at reading your
 monitor size from the monitor.  If it can't you can always set it manually
 with the DisplaySize option in /etc/X11/xorg.conf's Monitor section.

With a recent reinstall, KDM did not have such a default. Unless your monitor 
is not removable from the card (e.g. a laptop), you should always give the 
DisplaySize option (in case that the monitor is off during start of X).

 It's a bit of hassle to set up, but I really recommend putting the effort
 in.

I agree. Especially on displays with a higher resolution, it gives you a small 
wow-effect.

 KDE is the only desktop that seems to respect DPI size,

No.

 GNOME has taken the 
 crazy MS route of saying all displays are 96dpi.

AFAIK, you can still set it to system settings.

 The advantage is that you 
 can use the same KDE settings on different computers, and always have the
 fonts come out at a comfortable size for you.

The problem surely is badly programmed softeware. I recently saw what firefox 
does on a high resolution display (10 laptop): I was not amused. It just 
sucks, under Windows more than Linux but that is just relative to needs more 
work, better than old Mozilla, though.
Some of it surely relates to wrong website programming. After all those years, 
they just don't get it :-(

And whatever you think of it: do not try this under Windows. It kind of works 
but is _really_ ugly and most programs fail to work correctly. I hope they 
get this fixed with Windows Vista, they have to catch up a lot.

HS


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: RANT about fonts with KDE Updates

2006-09-09 Thread Alejandro Exojo
El Sábado, 9 de Septiembre de 2006 11:02, Andy Parkins escribió:
 In that case your X server DPI is probably wrong.  Try removing the forced
 DPI override in /etc/kde3/kdmrc, and X will have a go at reading your
 monitor size from the monitor.  If it can't you can always set it manually
 with the DisplaySize option in /etc/X11/xorg.conf's Monitor section.

 It's a bit of hassle to set up, but I really recommend putting the effort
 in.

 KDE is the only desktop that seems to respect DPI size, GNOME has taken the
 crazy MS route of saying all displays are 96dpi.  The advantage is that you
 can use the same KDE settings on different computers, and always have the
 fonts come out at a comfortable size for you.

Well, it seems that this will be selectable soon:
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-develm=115651723700985w=2

I personally don't understand this whole story, but since my fonts seem ok, I 
decided not to touch anything. :-)

-- 
Alex (a.k.a. suy) - GPG ID 0x0B8B0BC2
http://barnacity.net/ - Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: RANT about fonts with KDE Updates

2006-09-08 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le ven 8 septembre 2006 11:04, Lars Schimmer a écrit :
 Hi!

 I am not amused.

me neither.


 WHY for the sake of hell do I get EVERY time a KDE update ist done on
 my sid box another system font?

this has been discussed many times on that list.

if you are pissed with sid upgrades, use sarge, and wait for etch, there 
won't be any problems.
-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org


pgpdiZwfOFkl7.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: RANT about fonts with KDE Updates

2006-09-08 Thread Paul Johnson
On Friday 08 September 2006 02:04, Lars Schimmer wrote:
 Hi!

 I am not amused.

 WHY for the sake of hell do I get EVERY time a KDE update ist done on my
 sid box another system font?

I've never had this problem and I run sid.  I don't use the same fonts as the 
theme I use though, seems like some of the theme defaults could have a 
slightly more visible choices.  I may be correctable to 20/20, but that 
doesn't mean I can read flyspeck 3 at a comfortable distance from the 
monitor.

-- 
Paul Johnson
Email and IM (XMPP  Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED]



pgpD0RDNiEe1V.pgp
Description: PGP signature