Dear Debian Legal Team,
Thank you very much for your help. I've read each email in this
thread with care, and at last can consider this issue closed.
On 9 June 2017 at 02:27, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On 06/08/2017 06:52 PM, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'd prefer not to, because Message-ID reveals what I consider private
>> information (IP address or client hostname) to an unbounded audience,
>> and I believe that this is a greater privacy violation than the
>> lintian warning against downloading a hyperlinked image in local [...]
>
>
> That depends on the software that generated the message (e.g., Thunderbird
> seems to do uuid@domain, so avoids the privacy issue—at least it reveals
> less than the From header), but where it does you could just redact the
> hostname (or entire domain). That'd still preserve the ability to reference
> an individual message.
>
> Message-Id: and
> Message-Id:
>
> are both pretty clear what you're doing.
>
Anthony, thank you for this solution! :-) I didn't know that this was allowed.
Ben, now there's a Message-ID field. I'll upload to experimental as
soon as Sean Whitton grants me DM permissions for src:muse-el.
Sincerely,
Nicholas