Re: GPL and Court Procedure (was Re: Adobe open source ...)

2006-01-28 Thread Alexander Terekhov
On 1/28/06, Pedro A.D.Rezende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
 Like, say, ordered set of instructions to mean computer program

Hey Prof., how about a series of instructions?


  If you won't write something that means
  anything, is there some reason I should continue replying?

 Feed the troll?

Go ahead.

regards,
alexander.



GPL and Court Procedure (was Re: Adobe open source ...)

2006-01-27 Thread Raul Miller
On 1/27/06, Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 1/27/06, Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On 1/27/06, Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   What argument?
 
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/01/msg00475.html

 Edwards has already explained it to you.

If you can give me a specific reference (message and paragraph)
to where he addresses this point, I'd appreciate it.

 A question of law is addressed by likelihood of success on that
 portion breach of contract claim that concerns its trademark

Which question of law is are you talking about here?  What do you
mean by portion breach?  And why are you talking about
trademarks?

Do you really enjoy stringing words together without concern
for their meaning?  If you won't write something that means
anything, is there some reason I should continue replying?

Thanks,

--
Raul



Re: GPL and Court Procedure (was Re: Adobe open source ...)

2006-01-27 Thread Alexander Terekhov
On 1/27/06, Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
 anything, is there some reason I should continue replying?

You can't read. Stop replying. Drop an email to Judge Saris telling
her that you can't read and asking her to phone you back.

regards,
alexander.



Re: GPL and Court Procedure (was Re: Adobe open source ...)

2006-01-27 Thread Pedro A.D.Rezende

Raul Miller wrote:


On 1/27/06, Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

...

A question of law is addressed by likelihood of success on that
portion breach of contract claim that concerns its trademark
 
Which question of law is are you talking about here?  What do you

mean by portion breach?  And why are you talking about
trademarks?

Do you really enjoy stringing words together without concern
for their meaning?


Like, say, ordered set of instructions to mean computer program


If you won't write something that means
anything, is there some reason I should continue replying?


Feed the troll?


--
Raul



--

prof. Pedro Antonio Dourado de Rezende  /\
Computacao - Universidade de Brasilia  /  \
 - Libertas quae digitos desiderat -  /\
|http://www.cic.unb.br/docentes/pedro/sd.htm



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]