Re: your mail

2012-01-03 Thread andrei zavada
Hi Yaroslav,

On 3 January 2012 02:16, Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:

  *  Author:  Andrei Zavada johnhom...@gmail.com
  *   Parts from PhysioToolKit 
 (http://www.physionet.org/physiotools,
  *   by George B. Moody (geo...@mit.edu))

After studying debian maintainer's guide, I changed it as follows:

---8---
Format: 
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/Upstream-Name:
AghermannUpstream-Contact: Andrei Zavada johnhom...@gmail.comSource:
http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source
Files: *Copyright: 2008-2012 Andrei Zavada johnhom...@gmail.comLicense: GPL-2+
Files: src/libexstrom/exstrom.hhCopyright: 2007 Exstrom Laboratories
LLC http://www.exstrom.comLicense: GPL-2+
Files: src/libsigfile/psd.hhCopyright: 1980-2010 George B. Moody
geo...@mit.eduLicense: LGPL-2
---8---

The file includes the text of a short version of GPL-2 (even though
the guide says citing common licenses like this is not necessary).  I
know including the full text will not hurt; but perhaps I should
either also include the text of LGPL-2, or exclude both?  Is it ok to
exclude the text of both licenses altogether (as I provisorily did)?

 additionally IIRC according to DEP-5 shouldn't have double Copyright: fields

 Copyright: 2007 Exstrom Laboratories LLC
           2010-2012 Andrei Zavada

 also add 'License: GPL-2+' prior that detached paragraph with the license (I
 know that here it would look like a duplicate but actually it just opens the
 paragraph and tells what it is about, so those references to GPL-2+ license 
 now
 have the 'destination')
Fixed.

 also the last (most recent) changelog entry should close the ITP, so should 
 be something like

 Initial Debian release (Closes: #650393) and distribution could be
 changed from UNRELEASED to unstable.

Now the topmost entry in debian changelog goes:
---8---
aghermann (0.4.4-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Initial Debian release (Closes: #650393).
  * Version bump.
---8---

If the proposed changes are ok, I'll make them into a tarball and
upload in some 10h.

Cheers,
Andrei


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CADRQDB03XpMmUsVZrnq72DP1iFbahv+D8iwfARRaX_KeWVR=b...@mail.gmail.com



Unidentified subject!

2012-01-03 Thread Florent Angly




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f02e850.8010...@gmail.com



Re: your mail

2012-01-03 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Sorry -- I just can't parse this: -- somewhat really liked wrapping
things up:
 ---8---
 Format: 
 http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/Upstream-Name:
 AghermannUpstream-Contact: Andrei Zavada johnhom...@gmail.comSource:
 http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source
 Files: *Copyright: 2008-2012 Andrei Zavada johnhom...@gmail.comLicense: 
 GPL-2+
 Files: src/libexstrom/exstrom.hhCopyright: 2007 Exstrom Laboratories
 LLC http://www.exstrom.comLicense: GPL-2+
 Files: src/libsigfile/psd.hhCopyright: 1980-2010 George B. Moody
 geo...@mit.eduLicense: LGPL-2
 ---8---

 The file includes the text of a short version of GPL-2 (even though
 the guide says citing common licenses like this is not necessary).  I
 know including the full text will not hurt; but perhaps I should
 either also include the text of LGPL-2, or exclude both?  Is it ok to
 exclude the text of both licenses altogether (as I provisorily did)?

yes -- it was good as it was before, just needed few missing entries and
separate line with License: GPL-2+


-- 
=--=
Keep in touch www.onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120103135102.gw16...@onerussian.com



Re: aghermann for debian-med (was: Your mail)

2012-01-03 Thread andrei zavada
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 08:51:02 -0500
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:

 Sorry -- I just can't parse this: -- somewhat really liked wrapping
 things up:
Ok, I've had enough of gmail in a browser.  I'm switching to claws
immediately.

This is the original snip:
---
Format: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
Upstream-Name: Aghermann
Upstream-Contact: Andrei Zavada johnhom...@gmail.com
Source: http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/

Files: *
Copyright: 2008-2012 Andrei Zavada johnhom...@gmail.com
License: GPL-2+

Files: src/libexstrom/exstrom.hh
Copyright: 2007 Exstrom Laboratories LLC http://www.exstrom.com
License: GPL-2+

Files: src/libsigfile/psd.hh
Copyright: 1980-2010 George B. Moody geo...@mit.edu
License: LGPL-2
---


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120103160124.0e07a569@christian



Re: dicompyler 0.4.1-1 released

2012-01-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Adit,

thanks for your information.  I uploaded the latest version.  Any
enhancement of the build proces (which should work without downloading
distribute* and thus needed some patches) would be welcome anyway.

Kind regards

   Andreas.

On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 03:18:16PM -0600, Adit Panchal wrote:
 Hello all,
 
 I just wanted to let you know that a new version of dicompyler has
 been released. It is now also available via a python package via PyPI
 [ http://pypi.python.org/pypi/dicompyler/ ] and will be available via
 that route going forward.
 
 I recall that Mathieu said he can turn it into a package via
 distutils, so maybe we can go that route for future packaging?
 
 Additionally, when using the source tar.gz from PyPI, it will install
 a script dicompyler which is placed in the user's path.
 
 Let me know how I can assist from my end.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Adit
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: 
 http://lists.debian.org/cakzcd4oux-xs39ubte9h+equt0f-bnkydux_v2fqbbxx_9r...@mail.gmail.com
 
 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120103182402.ga13...@an3as.eu



Re: Sofa-framework: Again QT help needed / Re: [Sofa-devel] Debian packaging

2012-01-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Eric,

to give an update of this issue I uploaded the latest status of
packaging to

http://people.debian.org/~tille/packages/sofa-framework/

It shows problems building the plugins as you have noticed.

As I said in my latest (private) mail I really needed to add

   LIBS *= -lQt3Support -lQtGui -lQtCore

When I tried without the build was broken (and I've got the explicite
hint to add these libraries.  Even if this should not be needed in
theorie as you said when using

   QT *= qt3support

it just did not worked as intended.  If nobody has an idea how to solve
the problem in the end of the build log

   
http://people.debian.org/~tille/packages/sofa-framework/sofa-framework_1.0~rc1-1_amd64.build

I will probably apply pluginsample.patch and build the package without
this part.  However, any hint is welcome.

Kind regards

Andreas.

On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 05:57:41PM +0100, Eric Maeker wrote:
 Le 2 janvier 2012 15:40, Francois Jourdes francois.jour...@inria.fr a écrit 
 :
  Hi,
  Thank you for your interest for SOFA.
  I applied your patches (except for pluginsample.patch) to my sofa-rc1.0 
  directory and managed to compile successfully. However I did not encounter 
  the errors you reported on my first attempts.
  I am compiling with qt 4.6.2 installed on my machine, but I suspect 
  versions of qt = 4.5 are ok as well.
 
 The build failed with Qt4.7.4 on Ubuntu 11.10 and Debian testing.
 The build log can be found here
 
 
 http://people.debian.org/~tille/packages/sofa-framework/sofa-framework_1.0~rc1-1_amd64.build
 
  Regarding PluginExample I attached a patch which  excludes the classes 
  which requires qt from compilation if the SOFA_QT4 compilation flag is not 
  present.
 
 Ok I'll check as soon as possible.
 
  François Jourdes.
 
 Thanks
 -- 
 Eric Maeker, MD  (FR)
 http://www.freemedforms.com/
 http://www.ericmaeker.fr/
 http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMed
 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120103182548.gb13...@an3as.eu



Re: Cufflinks package fails to build on Launchpad PPA

2012-01-03 Thread Carlos Borroto
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote:
 Le Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 03:22:05PM -0500, Carlos Borroto a écrit :

 https://launchpadlibrarian.net/88726220/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-amd64.cufflinks_1.2.1-1~oneiric1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz

 I think I can see the problem, on that log I see the package is been
 build without the patches, so the BAM header files aren't been found:

 Dear Carlos,

 when I uploaded cufflinks, I did not realise that keeping the patches applied
 was only a side effect of building the source package, which is not done on
 Launchpad (and probably not on Debian's buildds, but cufflinks is not
 auto-built).


Hi Charles,

Thanks for looking into this issue and resolving it!. I don't think I
quite understand what is going on, I'll try to read a little more
about quilt and patch management.

The same thing is happening with the Tophat package Alex just uploaded:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/88998061/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-i386.tophat_1.3.3-1~oneiric1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz

Can you look into it? Should I just change debian/rules to match
what you did for cufflinks?

Thanks again and Happy New Year!
Carlos


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cabgghblzoyt1b4rplas2ow7ca2mnbe4yt7ehxyjtml3bud+...@mail.gmail.com



Debian stable question

2012-01-03 Thread Eric Maeker
Hi all,

Is it possible to add new package in the actual debian stable 0.6.3 ?
Or should new package be build using testing ?
That make a big difference for us because Qt4 versions are not the
same (and code must be adapted).

-- 
Eric Maeker, MD  (FR)
http://www.freemedforms.com/
http://www.ericmaeker.fr/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caj_xb5cuxn0tawvc70bw9eqgt5x6kffdjn6trpdopayxjah...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Debian stable question

2012-01-03 Thread Steffen Möller
Hello,

On 01/03/2012 10:16 PM, Eric Maeker wrote:

 Is it possible to add new package in the actual debian stable 0.6.3 ?
 Or should new package be build using testing ?
 That make a big difference for us because Qt4 versions are not the
 same (and code must be adapted).

It should be possible to get any package that is in testing also into
backports.debian.org. This has become an official service of Debian
and is much accepted. I do not see a new package to entering stable,
i.e. at least not anything that is not of key interest to everyone.

Cheers,

Steffen



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f0379ae.80...@gmx.de



Re: your mail

2012-01-03 Thread andrei zavada
Hi,

I am uploading the same version 0.4.4-1 again, but with debian/copyright
and changelog amended:
http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/deb/aghermann_0.4.4-1.dsc

Cheers


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/17624.1325636998@ra



Re: your mail

2012-01-03 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
ok -- please find attached the slightly corrected version -- this should
be sufficient -- reupload and I think we should be ready to go

On Wed, 04 Jan 2012, andrei zavada wrote:
 I am uploading the same version 0.4.4-1 again, but with debian/copyright
 and changelog amended:
 http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/deb/aghermann_0.4.4-1.dsc
-- 
=--=
Keep in touch www.onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic
Format: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
Upstream-Name: Aghermann
Upstream-Contact: Andrei Zavada johnhom...@gmail.com
Source: http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/

Files: *
Copyright: 2008-2012 Andrei Zavada johnhom...@gmail.com
License: GPL-2+

Files: src/libexstrom/exstrom.hh
Copyright: 2007 Exstrom Laboratories LLC http://www.exstrom.com
License: GPL-2+

Files: src/libsigfile/psd.hh
Copyright: 1980-2010 George B. Moody geo...@mit.edu
License: LGPL-2
 This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
 modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public
 License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
 version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
 .
 This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
 Library General Public License for more details.
 .
 On Debian systems, the full text of the GNU Library General Public
 License version 2 can be found in the file
 `/usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2'.

License: GPL-2+
 This program is free software; you can redistribute it
 and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public
 License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
 version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later
 version.
 .
 This program is distributed in the hope that it will be
 useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied
 warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
 PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License for more
 details.
 .
 You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public
 License along with this package; if not, write to the Free
 Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor,
 Boston, MA  02110-1301 USA
 .
 On Debian systems, the full text of the GNU General Public
 License version 2 can be found in the file
 `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2'.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature