Re: tool to rebuild all build-deps of a package

[Sean Whitton]

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 02:15:14PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:54 PM, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
> 
> > Is there any tool I can use to rebuild all packages which B-D/D on my
> > package? i want to do a local test before bumping it on the archive
> 
> apt install ratt

Poor man's alternative I've used several times for dh-elpa's rbuild-deps:

#!/bin/sh

# build-rdeps foo > dscs
# and edit dscs to remove lines that aren't packages

while read p; do
sbuild --no-apt-update --no-apt-upgrade --no-apt-distupgrade 
--extra-package="$HOME/src/dh-elpa_1.0_all.deb" \
   --no-run-piuparts --no-run-lintian --no-run-autopkgtest \
   --add-depends="dh-elpa (>= 1.0)" \
   "$p"
if [ $? != 0 ]; then
echo "$p" >> failures
fi
done < dscs

-- 
Sean Whitton


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#847941: RFS: libvecpf/1.1.0-1 ITP: libvecpf -- Vector Printf Library

[Tobias Frost]

Control: tags -1 wontfix
Control: block 806720 by -1

Hi Frederick,

the ITP is owned by Thierry Fauck, did you check with him if it is ok
to take this ITP? (Should be done via the BTS and then the ITP's meta
data should be corrected accordingly.

Please remove the wontfix when this has been resolved. 

--
tobi

Bug#847102: RFS: ginger/2.3.0-1 - HTML5-based host management tool

[Tobias Frost]

Control: block 775747 by -1

Please retitle the "RFP" bug (#775747) to "ITP" and set yourself as
owner.

--
tobi

Bug#845784: RFS: dropwizard-metrics [ITP]

[Tobias Frost]

Control: tags -1 wontfix
Control: block 768375 by -1


On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 17:16:52 + Christopher Hoskin  wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-j...@lists.debian.org
> 
> Dear mentors,
> 
>   I am looking for a sponsor for the package "dropwizard-metrics".
This software was originally
>   packaged by Tim Potter , but does not appear to have
been uploaded or updated
>   since Nov 2014. I have updated the package to the latest upstream
and standards versions.

Did you contact Tim? (CC'ed him with this mail; he still owns the ITP)

>   Amongst other things, it is a dependancy of spymemcached, which I
am currently investigating
>   packaging.
> 
>  * Package name: dropwizard-metrics
>Version : 3.1.2-1
>Upstream Author : Coda Hale, Yammer Inc.
>  * URL : http://metrics.dropwizard.io/
>  * License : Apache-2.0
>Section : java
> 
>   It builds those binary packages:
> 
> libdropwizard-metrics-java - capture JVM- and application-level
metrics for Java applications
> 
>   To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
> 
>   https://mentors.debian.net/package/dropwizard-metrics
> 
> 
>   Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:
> 
> dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dropwizard-
metrics/dropwizard-metrics_3.1.2-1.dsc
> 
>   More information about dropwizard-metrics can be obtained from http
://metrics.dropwizard.io/.
> 
>   The package source is being managed in the pkg-java team Alioth
repository:
> 
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/dropwizard-metrics.git
> 
>   Changes since the last upload:

There is no previous upload. 

> 
>   * Team upload
>   * New upstream release (3.1.2)
>   * Minimal changes to get updated package building
> + Remove old patches
> + Add new modules to libdropwizard-metrics-java.poms, ignore
modules which
>   won't build.
> + Update maven.rules and maven.ignoreRules
> + Add new dependencies to debian/control
>   * Use secure VCS URLs
>   * Update Standards-Version from 3.9.6 to 3.9.8 (no change required)
>   * Update debian/copyright
>   * Use secure URL for copyright format
> 
>  -- Christopher Hoskin   Sat, 26 Nov
2016 17:00:10 +
> 
>   Regards,
>Christopher Hoskin
> 

Please check with Tim if it is ok for him if you take over the ITP or
if he would be ok for a Comaintainer, tidy up the changelog (as this is
still an initial upload) and then remove the "wontfix". 

--
tobi

Bug#846399: marked as done (RFS: rush/1.8+dfsg-1 -- New upstream's release.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2016 06:11:52 + (UTC)
with message-id <1704688462.9068069.1482127912...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#846399: RFS: rush/1.8+dfsg-1 -- New upstream's release.
has caused the Debian Bug report #846399,
regarding RFS: rush/1.8+dfsg-1 -- New upstream's release.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
846399: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=846399
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal


Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor of the package "rush":

  Package name: rush
  Version : 1.8+dfsg-1
  Upstream Author : Sergey Poznyakoff 
  URL : http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/projects/rush/
  License : GPL-3+
  Section : shells

It builds a single binary package:

  rush  - restricted user shell

Further information about this package upload is located at

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/rush

A direct download of the package itself is simple:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rush/rush_1.8+dfsg-1.dsc

Changes since last upload:

  * New upstream release.
  * Increase hardening level.
+ debian/rules: Updated.
  * Verifying original source archive while rebuilding it.
+ debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp: New file.
+ debian/source/include-binaries: New file.
+ debian/rules: Expand target 'get-orig-source' with a step that
  verifies the source archive fetched from upstream's location.
  * Review patches.
+ debian/patches/dfsg_reduction.diff: Updated.
+ debian/patches/tcpmux_service.diff: Updated, partially applied.
+ debian/patches/chroot_then_chdir.diff: Updated.
+ debian/patches/gets_removed.diff: Obsolete.
+ debian/patches/cve_2013_6889.diff: Removed, applied by Upstream.
+ debian/patches/help_text.diff: Likewise.
+ debian/patches/format_security.diff: New file.
  * Upstream author now provides manual pages.
+ debian/patches/manpages.diff: New file.
+ debian/rules: Preserve the manual pages during target get-orig-source.
  Override dh_installman.
+ debian/rush.manpages: Refreshed list.
  * debian/copyright: Updated.
  * [lintian] Mend spelling errors in README.Debian.


Best regards,
  Mats Erik Andersson
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

>A revised packaging has been uploaded. I have inspected '/usr/sbin/uscan' in

>order to find out how prepare a call to gpgv. This has been added into the
>target 'get-orig-source', but I have also changed 'debian/copyright' and
>'debian/watch' to accomodate for your suggestion. I am not prepared to drop
>the target 'get-orig-source', though.



thanks!

G.--- End Message ---

Re: tool to rebuild all build-deps of a package

[Paul Wise]

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:54 PM, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:

> Is there any tool I can use to rebuild all packages which B-D/D on my
> package? i want to do a local test before bumping it on the archive

apt install ratt

> Extra points for running the autopkgtests (if any)

You should use autopkgtest for that.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#847079: marked as done (RFS: groonga/6.1.1-1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2016 06:01:15 + (UTC)
with message-id <934496706.9107344.1482127275...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#847079: RFS: groonga/6.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #847079,
regarding RFS: groonga/6.1.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
847079: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=847079
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga"

* Package name: groonga
  Version : 6.1.1-1
  Upstream Author : Groonga Project 
* Url : http://groonga.org/
* Licenses: LGPL-2.1
  Section : database

It builds those binary packages:

  * groonga
  * groonga-server-common
  * groonga-server-gqtp
  * libgroonga-dev
  * libgroonga0
  * groonga-tokenizer-mecab
  * groonga-token-filter-stem
  * groonga-plugin-suggest
  * groonga-bin
  * groonga-httpd
  * groonga-doc
  * groonga-examples
  * groonga-munin-plugins

To access further information about this package, visit the following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/groonga

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/groonga/groonga_6.1.1-1.dsc

More information about groonga can be obtained from
http://groonga.org/

Changes since last upload:

  * New upstream release.
  * debian/patches/fix-nginx-FTBFS-on-kfreebsd.patch
- Refresh patch to fix FTBFS on kFreeBSD.
  * debian/control
- Add dependency to support Zstd column compression.

Regards,


pgp2XxQCulJDh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi

>https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/groonga/groonga_6.1.1-1.dsc
--- End Message ---

tool to rebuild all build-deps of a package

[gustavo panizzo (gfa)]

Hello

Is there any tool I can use to rebuild all packages which B-D/D on my
package? i want to do a local test before bumping it on the archive

Extra points for running the autopkgtests (if any)

thanks!

PS: pkg is python-pytest-timeout

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa

Bug#848199: marked as done (RFS: evil-el/1.2.12-2 )

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2016 05:47:50 + (UTC)
with message-id <174527167.9052226.1482126470...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#848199: RFS: evil-el/1.2.12-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #848199,
regarding RFS: evil-el/1.2.12-2 
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
848199: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848199
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "evil-el"

* Package name: evil-el
  Version : 1.2.12-2
  Upstream Author : Vegard Øye 
* Url : https://bitbucket.org/lyro/evil/wiki/Home
* Licenses: GPL-3+,GFDL-1.3+,GPL-2+
  Section : lisp

It builds those binary packages:

  * elpa-evil

To access further information about this package, visit the following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/evil-el

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/evil-el/evil-el_1.2.12-2.dsc

Alternatively, you can access package debian/ directory via git from URL:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/evil-el.git

More information about evil-el can be obtained from
https://bitbucket.org/lyro/evil/wiki/Home

Changes since last upload:

  [ Sean Whitton ]
  * Team upload.
  * Fix Vcs-* URIs.

  [ Dmitry Bogatov ]
  * Run tests only if standards streams are terminals (Closes: #829299)
  * Temporary skip test suite, which fails with emacs25 (Closes: #847040)

Regards,
  Dmitry Bogatov
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

>> Good idea. See 0ed6f10622b59874ad9d1008172439de9c1a8388
>
>Thanks for preparing a new upload -- LGTM.



done thanks!
G.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#848638: RFS: cdist/4.4.1-1

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

close 848638
thanks

Bug#848638: RFS: cdist/4.4.1-1

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

Hi

>  * New upstream release

Bug#848420: RFS: dmalloc/5.5.2-7 [ITA]

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

Hi,

>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dmalloc"

>  * Add debian/libdmalloc5.symbols file.
>  * Update debian/libdmalloc5.shlibs file.


seems that the symbols file needs some tweaks :)

G.

Bug#848638: RFS: cdist/4.4.1-1

[Dmitry Bogatov]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cdist"

* Package name: cdist
  Version : 4.4.1-1
  Upstream Author : Nico Schottelius 
* Url : http://www.nico.schottelius.org/software/cdist/
* Licenses: GPL-3+,GPL-3
  Section : admin

It builds those binary packages:

  * cdist
  * cdist-doc

To access further information about this package, visit the following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/cdist

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cdist/cdist_4.4.1-1.dsc

Alternatively, you can access package debian/ directory via git from URL:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/cdist.git

More information about cdist can be obtained from
http://www.nico.schottelius.org/software/cdist/

Changes since last upload:

  * New upstream release

Regards,
  Dmitry Bogatov

Re: Bug#847969: RFS: libpam-ldap/186-2

[Lucas Castro]

On 18-12-2016 10:30, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 02:54:18PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote:
>> Ready for upload.
> The changelog still says 3.6.8.
Mind crashing, I've noticed just the 's' missing on standard[s]-version.

-- 
Lucas Castro



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#848605: RFS: gexec/0.4-2 [QA]

[David Davies-Jones]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gexec"

 * Package name: gexec
   Version : 0.4-2
   Upstream Author : Ferry Boender 
 * URL : https://github.com/fboender/gexec
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : x11

It builds those binary packages:

 gexec - Small command executer with autocompletion using GTK+

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

 https://mentors.debian.net/package/gexec


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

 dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gexec/gexec_0.4-2.dsc

More information about gexec can be obtained from
https://github.com/fboender/gexec.

Changes since the last upload:

 * QA upload.
 * Set maintainer to Debian QA Group
 * Updated to debhelper 10
 * Enabled build hardening
 * Converted copyright to DEP-5
 * Removed redundant watch file
 * Added homepage
 * Standards version 3.9.8

Regards,
 David William Richmond Jones

Bug#848133: RFS: rdup/1.1.15-1.0

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

Hi Tobias,


>-- CFLAGS += `dpkg-buildflags --get CPPFLAGS` looks wrong


this is done sometimes to make cmake aware of CPPFLAGS [1]

this package however uses autotools, and I don't know about it :)


[1] https://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=12928

G.

Bug#844988: RFS: gnu-social/1.2+20160913+git7d67eefd+dfsg4-1[ITP] -- Distributed social networking platform

[Tobias Frost]

control: tags -1 wontfix

mentors says:
"Package uploaded for the unreleased distribution"

so please first fix this and then remove the wontfix tag.

--
tobi

Bug#848133: RFS: rdup/1.1.15-1.0

[Tobias Frost]

Control: tags -1 moreinfo

Hi Félix,

(I won't sponsor this because I will not find time to do so before the
Stretch-Window will close, except you'll be very fast in providing an
updated package; Any other DD can/should grab this package if wanted)


some remarks:

- d/changelog does not contain the changelog entry of the NMU 1.1.11-
1.1 and seems so also not the changes by this NMU

- there is no announcement of the NMU on the BTS. Did you try to
contact the Maintainer?

- the changelog should be more verbose. E.g "remove unused patch"
-- should list which ones? There are undocumented changes.

-- CFLAGS += `dpkg-buildflags --get CPPFLAGS` looks wrong

(please remove the moreinfo tag once the package is improved.
Please make sure to try to contact the maintainer, best using the BTS)
-- 
tobi

Bug#848499: RFS: mercurial-keyring/1.1.7-1

[Christoph Mathys]

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mercurial-keyring"

* Package name: mercurial-keyring
  Version : 1.1.7-1
  Upstream Author : Marcin Kasperski 
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mercurial_keyring
* License : BSD-3-clause
  Section : python

It builds those binary packages:

  mercurial-keyring - Mercurial Keyring Extension

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/mercurial-keyring


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mercurial-keyring/mercurial-keyring_1.1.7-1.dsc

More information about mercurial-keyring can be obtained from
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mercurial_keyring

Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release

Regards,
Christoph Mathys

Bug#848200: marked as done (RFS: eoconv/1.4-2 )

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 18 Dec 2016 21:25:50 +0100
with message-id <1482092750.28465.6.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: eoconv/1.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #848200,
regarding RFS: eoconv/1.4-2 
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
848200: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848200
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eoconv"

* Package name: eoconv
  Version : 1.4-2
  Upstream Author : Tristan Miller 
* Url : http://en.nothingisreal.com/wiki/Eoconv
* Licenses: GPL-3+
  Section : text

It builds those binary packages:

  * eoconv

To access further information about this package, visit the following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/eoconv

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eoconv/eoconv_1.4-2.dsc

Alternatively, you can access package debian/ directory via git from URL:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/eoconv.git

More information about eoconv can be obtained from
http://en.nothingisreal.com/wiki/Eoconv

Changes since last upload:

  * Fix corrupting utf8 text (Closes: #824407)
  * Install upstream changelog
  * Bump standards version to 3.9.8 (No changes needed)

Regards,
  Dmitry Bogatov
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Uploaded, many thanks for your contribution!

--
tobi--- End Message ---

Bug#846259: RFS: Juliar/0.0-12 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable] -- New Programming Language

[Tobias Frost]

Hallo juliarl...@gmail.com,

I've neither found the ITP nor I found a package to review. 
Additionally there were concerns about the suitabiltity of Julien for
Debian at this stage.

Please read https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers, 
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#ne
wpackage and https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide

(and also https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq)

Until then I will close this bug as there is nothing actionable.

--
tobi

Bug#846259: marked as done (RFS: Juliar/0.0-12 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable] -- New Programming Language)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 18 Dec 2016 21:21:12 +0100
with message-id <1482092472.28465.5.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: Juliar/0.0-12 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if 
applicable] -- New Programming Language
has caused the Debian Bug report #846259,
regarding RFS: Juliar/0.0-12 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable] -- New 
Programming Language
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
846259: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=846259
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
  Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "Juliar":

 * Package name: Juliar
   Version : 0.0-12
   Upstream Author : Andrey Makhanov 
 * URL : https://www.juliar.org
 * License : GNU v3
   Section : 1

  It builds those binary packages:

Juliar - a new Universal programming language that is cross-platform.

It is a functional OOP programming language with an object structure
similar to linux with ability to move between object of objects via
".." i.e.

Juliar/object/../dir

  It can be used for web-development, as a desktop application, and as
console application. It can run in browser (client-side) as well.

The application has a good Network library and has a concept of
"universal" modules which allows one to create a module for example in
Python, Ruby, Fortran, or C and then import it into Juliar.

The Programming Language is fairly new and is currently up to Alpha 12.

Although the application has been packaged before into a private apt
repo. It would be great to make it available to the public.

I really hope that someone will sponsor the package as the application
has been in development for 1.5 years and has a growing community.

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://www.juliar.org


  Alternatively, one can download the package using instructions found at

  https://www.juliar.org

  More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.juliar.org

  Changes since the last upload:

  N/A


  Regards,
 Andrey Juliar Team
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hallo juliarl...@gmail.com,

I've neither found the ITP nor I found a package to review. 
Additionally there were concerns about the suitabiltity of Julien for
Debian at this stage.

Please read https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers, 
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#ne
wpackage and https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide

(and also https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq)

Until then I will close this bug as there is nothing actionable.

--
tobi--- End Message ---

Bug#848593: RFS: budgie-indicator-applet/0.3-1

[Tobias Frost]

Control: tags -1 moreinfo

(Please remove the moreinfo tag once your updated package is ready to
be reviewed)

Bug#848593: RFS: budgie-indicator-applet/0.3-1

[Tobias Frost]

Hi foss.freedom,

(I won't sponsor this because I will not find time to do so before the
Stretch-Window will close, except you'll be very fast in providing an
updated package; Any other DD can/should grab this package if wanted)

On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:47:34 + "foss.freedom"  wrote:

>   Changes since the last upload:
> 
>* New upstream release
> - Respect icon spacing for chosen theme
> - background color change when theme changes

The Debian changelog is not the upstream changelog. (See Policy 4.4)
Just write "New upstream release"

>   * Packaging Changes:

... It is *soley* to document packaging changes, so this line is
superfluent. 

> - updated metadata for updated upstream repo name change
> 

- The change in d/rules is not documented in d/changelog.

- There is an uppercase LICENSE: Section in d/copyright.

-- 
tobi

Bug#848340: RFS: smpq/1.6-1

[Tobias Frost]

Control: tags -1 moreinfo

Hallo Pali,

(I won't sponsor this because I will not find time to do so before the
Stretch-Window will close, except you'll be very fast in providing an
updated package)

Here's a review:

- d/changelog: The changelog for 1.5-1 has a different timestamp than
the one in the archives. Please make sure that you base your changes
*exactly* on the state that have been uploaded.

- d/compat could be bumped to 10

- is Vcs-Bzr: lp:smpq really working? (not sure, my bzr seems broken
atm) This also causes linitian to bark: 
I: smpq source: vcs-field-uses-insecure-uri vcs-bzr lp:smpq

- The version of the B-D on libstorm-dev is not needed -- there is no
older version in Debian

- The README file does barely contain information beside building
instructions and therefore should not be installed.

- please do not shout in d/changelog (CHANGELOG; dh_installchangelogs
will rename CHANGELOG to changelog.gz anyway, so it is not needed to
write in uppercase. 
BTW, the override in d/rules is not necessary. dh_installchangelog will
find it even when written uppercase.

- check if you can add the "as needed" linking flags to fix:
 
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if
debian/kio-smpq/usr/lib/kde4/kio_smpq.so was not linked against
libgcc_s.so.1 (it uses none of the library's symbols)

Please fix those and remove the "moreinfo" tag afterwards to indicate
that you're ready for the next review.

-- 
tobi

Bug#848420: marked as done (RFS: dmalloc/5.5.2-7 [ITA])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 18 Dec 2016 20:06:03 +0100
with message-id <1482087963.28367.3.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: dmalloc/5.5.2-7 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #848420,
regarding RFS: dmalloc/5.5.2-7 [ITA]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
848420: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848420
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dmalloc"

* Package name: dmalloc
  Version : 5.5.2-7
  Upstream Author : Gray Watson 
* URL : http://dmalloc.com/
* License : CC-BY-SA-3.0 or Dmalloc
  Section : devel

It builds these binary packages:

  libdmalloc-dev - debug memory allocation library (development files and doc)
  libdmalloc5 - debug memory allocation library

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/dmalloc


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmalloc/dmalloc_5.5.2-7.dsc

More information about dmalloc can be obtained from http://dmalloc.com.

Changes since the last upload:

dmalloc (5.5.2-7) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New maintainer (Closes: 812613).
  * Add debian/libdmalloc5.symbols file.
  * Update debian/libdmalloc5.shlibs file.
  * debian/rules:
+ Make sure strdup() definition is included in library.
+ Simplify how we derive version numbers.
+ Build with all hardening flags set.
  * debian/control:
+ Indicate compliance with Standards Version 3.9.8.
+ Fix unconditional dependency on multiarch-support.
+ Wrap and sort.
+ Update homepage URL.
+ Update maintainer as myself.
+ Add provisional VCS details.
  * debian/manpage/dmalloc.1: Fix typo.
  * Add debian/source/lintian-overrides to silence warning about verifying
upstream tarballs with a GPG signature, as there is none available.
  * Convert debian/copyright file to machine-readable format and update.
  * debian/patches/*:
+ Update all patches with DEP-3 headers that work with git-buildpackage,
  retaining as much meta info as possible.
+ Add patch to fix perl shebang in contrib/dmalloc_summarize.pl to
  appease Lintian.
+ Patch configure.ac to use AC_LANG_SOURCE macro for all test code.
  The use of this macro has been required since version 2.66 of
  autoconf.
+ Add patch to fix compilation warnings.

 -- Carlos Maddela   Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:02:58 +1100

Regards,
  Carlos Maddela
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Uploaded, thanks for your contribution!--- End Message ---

Bug#848593: RFS: budgie-indicator-applet/0.3-1

[foss.freedom]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "budgie-indicator-applet"

 * Package name: budgie-indicator-applet
   Version : 0.3-1
   Upstream Author : David Mohammed 
 * URL : https://github.com/UbuntuBudgie/budgie-indicator-applet
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : misc

  It builds those binary packages:

budgie-indicator-applet - Application Indicator for the budgie-desktop

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/budgie-indicator-applet


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/budgie-indicator-applet/budgie-indicator-applet_0.3-1.dsc


  Changes since the last upload:

   * New upstream release
- Respect icon spacing for chosen theme
- background color change when theme changes
  * Packaging Changes:
- updated metadata for updated upstream repo name change


  Regards,
   David Mohammed

Re: Usage of r-base-core_3.3.2-1 in pbuilder somehow broken

[Dirk Eddelbuettel]

On 18 December 2016 at 07:39, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| 
| On 18 December 2016 at 09:27, Andreas Tille wrote:
| | Hi,
| | 
| | since yesterday I'm not able to build any r-* packages any more in
| | pbuilder.  I get something like:
| | 
| | ...
| | Selecting previously unselected package r-base-core.^M
| | Preparing to unpack .../102-r-base-core_3.3.2-1_amd64.deb ...^M
| | dpkg-maintscript-helper: error: dpkg: error: version '' has bad syntax: 
version string is empty^M
| | dpkg: error processing archive 
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-7jWbcq/102-r-base-core_3.3.2-1_amd64.deb (--unpack):^M
| |  subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1^M
| | dpkg-maintscript-helper: error: dpkg: error: version '' has bad syntax: 
version string is empty^M
| | dpkg: error while cleaning up:^M
| |  subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 1^M
| | ...
| | 
| | You can probably check this when building any r-cran-* package (I just
| | tried r-cran-rncl if you want a certain example).  Any idea what might
| | went wrong here?
| 
| Works for me. I just updated r-cran-rcpparmadillo as RcppArmadillo (for which
| I am upstream) just got a new version.
| 
|   Selecting previously unselected package r-base-core.

|   Preparing to unpack .../120-r-base-core_3.3.2-1_amd64.deb ...

|   Unpacking r-base-core (3.3.2-1) ...

|   Selecting previously unselected package r-cran-littler.

|   Preparing to unpack .../121-r-cran-littler_0.3.1-1_amd64.deb ...

|   Unpacking r-cran-littler (0.3.1-1) ...

|   Selecting previously unselected package littler.

|   Preparing to unpack .../122-littler_0.3.1-1_all.deb ...

|   Unpacking littler (0.3.1-1) ...

| 
| Now, I may just be lucky and an 'sudo pbuilder update' away from breakage but
| it seems that some handshake been dpkg-maintscript-helper and r-base-core is
| broken.  I would point the change vector to dpkg; package r-base has not
| changed in a while, and has not been touched since the R 3.3.2 release.
| 
| Can you debug locally? 

Also:

  
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=r-cran-rcpparmadillo=unstable

Dirk

-- 
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

Re: Bug#848499: RFS: mercurial-keyring/1.1.6-1

[Andrey Rahmatullin]

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 05:04:35PM +0100, Christoph Mathys wrote:
> Thanks for the information. Altough I don't agree with "does not work". "Has
> a bug that has no impact on the core functionality" is more accurate.
Sorry, I didn't think about what commands are affected.

> I'll package the new version as soon as I find some time. Do I just update
> the RFS-bug with the updated information? Or close the current one and file
> a new RFS with the new version?
Update the bug and retitle it.

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#848499: RFS: mercurial-keyring/1.1.6-1

[Christoph Mathys]

On 18.12.2016 14:49, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

The package doesn't work, see
https://bitbucket.org/Mekk/mercurial_keyring/issues/52/keyring_check-crashes




Thanks for the information. Altough I don't agree with "does not work". 
"Has a bug that has no impact on the core functionality" is more accurate.


I'll package the new version as soon as I find some time. Do I just 
update the RFS-bug with the updated information? Or close the current 
one and file a new RFS with the new version?


Thanks,
Christoph

Bug#848148: RFS: restic/0.3.1-1

[Michael Stapelberg]

Hi Félix,

Thanks for working on this package!

If you’re willing to move this package to pkg-go, I’m willing to sponsor
it :). Please see https://pkg-go.alioth.debian.org/

Félix Sipma  writes:
> Download with dget:
>
> dget -x 
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/restic/restic_0.3.1-1.dsc

First review round comments:

• Why do you install the source code to /usr/lib/go/src? Is restic
  intended to be used as a library? If yes, can you split the source
  into a -dev package?

• Upstream commented that it should be possible to use the go tool for
  building instead of build.go:
  https://github.com/restic/restic/issues/355#issuecomment-267026832
  Could you please switch to using the go tool with dh-golang and drop
  the patch for build.go?

• Can you please place debian/* under the same license as the upstream
  code itself to prevent issues with patching?

• Can you please enable gbp’s pristine-tar feature in gbp.conf?

• Can you please move the git repository to the pkg-go directory on
  alioth?

-- 
Best regards,
Michael

Bug#847015: RFS: debdelta/0.55+nmu1 [RC] [NMU]

[Tobias Frost]

Control: tags -1 wontfix

Hallo Carlos,

Did you (try) to contact the maintainers? I could also not see an
debdiff to the BTS where you announcing the NMU. (If I missed it please
post the bug number)

Also, there are many changes that are really out of scope an NMU*, like
the change to debhelper, reproduciblity... 

Marking as wontfix -- please provide a more minimalistic patch to just
fix the important (RC) problem and announce the NMU on the BTS
(nmudiff(1) is handy here)

Thanks!

* Please read https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/p
kgs.html#nmu

--
tobi 

On Mon, 05 Dec 2016 09:15:50 +1100 Carlos Maddela 
wrote:

> Changes since the last upload:
> 
> debdelta (0.55+nmu1) unstable; urgency=medium
> 
>   [ Carlos Maddela ]
>   * Non-maintainer upload.
>   * Fix i386 debdelta URLs output by debpatch-url on amd64 system.
> (Closes: #740552)
>   * Fix guessing of xz parameters for files compressed in parallel.
> (Closes: #845173)
>   * Conform to Standards Version 3.9.8.
> By converting the build process to use debhelper and include
rules to
> create the documentation and language support files, we can
guarantee
> that the builds are completely reproducible. (Closes: #30,
#793004)
>   * Include a sample APT conf snippet for debdelta integration with
APT.
> Thanks to Ritesh Raj Sarraf  (Closes: #817140)
> 
>   [ Colin Watson ]
>   * Allow applying patches to unpacked .debs in locations other than
/.
> (Closes: #710398)
> 
>   [ Mert Dirik ]
>   * Add timeout option to debdelta-upgrade. (Closes: #735142)
> 
>  -- Carlos Maddela   Sun, 04 Dec 2016 02:38:46
+1100
> 
> 
> Regards,
>   Carlos Maddela

Bug#848384: RFS: xmacro/0.3pre-20000911-7 [ITA]

[Tobias Frost]

Am Sonntag, den 18.12.2016, 16:07 +0100 schrieb Tobias Frost:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> 
> Hi Vicent,
> 
> Am Samstag, den 17.12.2016, 00:46 +0100 schrieb Vincent Carluer:
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: serious
> > 
> > Dear mentors,
> > 
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xmacro"
> > 
> > * Package name: xmacro
> >    Version : 0.3pre-2911-7
> >    Upstream Author : Gabor Keresztfalvi 
> >  * URL :  https://sourceforge.net/projects/xmacro/
> >  * License : GPLv2
> >    Section : utils
> > 
> > It builds those binary packages:
> > 
> > xmacro - Record / Play keystrokes and mouse movements in X
> > displays
> > 
> > To access further information about this package, please visit the
> > following URL:
> > 
> >   https://mentors.debian.net/package/xmacro
> > 
> > 
> > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
> > command:
> > 
> > dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmacro/xm
> > ac
> > ro_0.3pre-2911-7.dsc
> > 
> > Changes since the last upload:
> >   * Fixing build failure with GCC-6 via rearanging the header order
> > patch by Eduard Bloch
> > (closes: #831195)
> >   * Change compat and control to debhelper 9, Standards-Version to
> > 3.9.8
> >   * Change dh_clean -k to dh-prep
> >   * Move patch format to full 3.0 (quilt) without global .diff.gz
> >   * New maintainer for package: Vincent Carluer (closes: #832150)
> > 
> > 
> > This is my first packaging :D
> 
> No problem ;-) You'll be packaging like a pro soon ;-) 
> 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Vincent Carl401440uer
> > 
> 
> Here's a short review:
> 
> - Please add a homepage field to d/control
> - What is about the other bugs in the BTS, especially #401440
> - Please convert d/copyright to dep5
> - The patches need dep3 headers.
> - d/rules should be modernized to short debhelper format.
> - d/dirs can be likely dropped
> - why not compat level 10?
> - please add a d/watch file
> 
> 
> For subsequent uploads:
> - Please create manpages for the binaries.
> 
> 
> (I'm not gonna to sponsor this as I will not find time to do this
> before Dec 25 -- the final day for Stretch)
> 
> Thanks for your contribution!
> 
> --
> tobi

PS: Why the Pre-Depends on dpkg?

Bug#848384: RFS: xmacro/0.3pre-20000911-7 [ITA]

[Tobias Frost]

Control: tags -1 moreinfo

Hi Vicent,

Am Samstag, den 17.12.2016, 00:46 +0100 schrieb Vincent Carluer:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: serious
> 
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xmacro"
> 
> * Package name: xmacro
>    Version : 0.3pre-2911-7
>    Upstream Author : Gabor Keresztfalvi 
>  * URL :  https://sourceforge.net/projects/xmacro/
>  * License : GPLv2
>    Section : utils
> 
> It builds those binary packages:
> 
> xmacro - Record / Play keystrokes and mouse movements in X
> displays
> 
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
> 
>   https://mentors.debian.net/package/xmacro
> 
> 
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
> command:
> 
> dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmacro/xmac
> ro_0.3pre-2911-7.dsc
> 
> Changes since the last upload:
>   * Fixing build failure with GCC-6 via rearanging the header order
> patch by Eduard Bloch
> (closes: #831195)
>   * Change compat and control to debhelper 9, Standards-Version to
> 3.9.8
>   * Change dh_clean -k to dh-prep
>   * Move patch format to full 3.0 (quilt) without global .diff.gz
>   * New maintainer for package: Vincent Carluer (closes: #832150)
> 
> 
> This is my first packaging :D

No problem ;-) You'll be packaging like a pro soon ;-) 

> Regards,
> 
> Vincent Carl401440uer
> 

Here's a short review:

- Please add a homepage field to d/control
- What is about the other bugs in the BTS, especially #401440
- Please convert d/copyright to dep5
- The patches need dep3 headers.
- d/rules should be modernized to short debhelper format.
- d/dirs can be likely dropped
- why not compat level 10?
- please add a d/watch file


For subsequent uploads:
- Please create manpages for the binaries.


(I'm not gonna to sponsor this as I will not find time to do this
before Dec 25 -- the final day for Stretch)

Thanks for your contribution!

--
tobi

Re: Bug#848499: RFS: mercurial-keyring/1.1.6-1

[Andrey Rahmatullin]

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

The package doesn't work, see
https://bitbucket.org/Mekk/mercurial_keyring/issues/52/keyring_check-crashes


-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: Usage of r-base-core_3.3.2-1 in pbuilder somehow broken

[Dirk Eddelbuettel]

On 18 December 2016 at 09:27, Andreas Tille wrote:
| Hi,
| 
| since yesterday I'm not able to build any r-* packages any more in
| pbuilder.  I get something like:
| 
| ...
| Selecting previously unselected package r-base-core.^M
| Preparing to unpack .../102-r-base-core_3.3.2-1_amd64.deb ...^M
| dpkg-maintscript-helper: error: dpkg: error: version '' has bad syntax: 
version string is empty^M
| dpkg: error processing archive 
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-7jWbcq/102-r-base-core_3.3.2-1_amd64.deb (--unpack):^M
|  subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1^M
| dpkg-maintscript-helper: error: dpkg: error: version '' has bad syntax: 
version string is empty^M
| dpkg: error while cleaning up:^M
|  subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 1^M
| ...
| 
| You can probably check this when building any r-cran-* package (I just
| tried r-cran-rncl if you want a certain example).  Any idea what might
| went wrong here?

Works for me. I just updated r-cran-rcpparmadillo as RcppArmadillo (for which
I am upstream) just got a new version.

  Selecting previously unselected package r-base-core.

  Preparing to unpack .../120-r-base-core_3.3.2-1_amd64.deb ...

  Unpacking r-base-core (3.3.2-1) ...

  Selecting previously unselected package r-cran-littler.

  Preparing to unpack .../121-r-cran-littler_0.3.1-1_amd64.deb ...

  Unpacking r-cran-littler (0.3.1-1) ...

  Selecting previously unselected package littler.

  Preparing to unpack .../122-littler_0.3.1-1_all.deb ...

  Unpacking littler (0.3.1-1) ...


Now, I may just be lucky and an 'sudo pbuilder update' away from breakage but
it seems that some handshake been dpkg-maintscript-helper and r-base-core is
broken.  I would point the change vector to dpkg; package r-base has not
changed in a while, and has not been touched since the R 3.3.2 release.

Can you debug locally? 

Dirk

-- 
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

Bug#847969: RFS: libpam-ldap/186-2

[Andrey Rahmatullin]

On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 02:54:18PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote:
> Ready for upload.
The changelog still says 3.6.8.

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#848199: RFS: evil-el/1.2.12-2

[Sean Whitton]

control: tag -1 +confirmed

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 10:40:16AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> Good idea. See 0ed6f10622b59874ad9d1008172439de9c1a8388

Thanks for preparing a new upload -- LGTM.

-- 
Sean Whitton


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: Usage of r-base-core_3.3.2-1 in pbuilder somehow broken

[Andrey Rahmatullin]

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 09:27:27AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> dpkg-maintscript-helper: error: dpkg: error: version '' has bad syntax: 
> version string is empty^M
https://bugs.debian.org/848422

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Usage of r-base-core_3.3.2-1 in pbuilder somehow broken

[Andreas Tille]

Hi,

since yesterday I'm not able to build any r-* packages any more in
pbuilder.  I get something like:

...
Selecting previously unselected package r-base-core.^M
Preparing to unpack .../102-r-base-core_3.3.2-1_amd64.deb ...^M
dpkg-maintscript-helper: error: dpkg: error: version '' has bad syntax: version 
string is empty^M
dpkg: error processing archive 
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-7jWbcq/102-r-base-core_3.3.2-1_amd64.deb (--unpack):^M
 subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1^M
dpkg-maintscript-helper: error: dpkg: error: version '' has bad syntax: version 
string is empty^M
dpkg: error while cleaning up:^M
 subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 1^M
...

You can probably check this when building any r-cran-* package (I just
tried r-cran-rncl if you want a certain example).  Any idea what might
went wrong here?

Kind regards

   Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de