Bug#171795: openoffice.org: openoffice toolbars and menus all scrunched up and too small to use
Hi aj, aj wrote: > Package: openoffice.org > Version: 1.0.1-6 > Severity: grave > Tags: sid > Justification: renders package unusable > > It looks like all the text in the toolbars and menus is size 0 or > something. Maybe some typeface problem? > > Take a look for yourself: > http://www.cybercom.net/~aj/Screenshot.png This are known issues. This is supposed to be fixed in openoffice.org-debian-files 1.0.1-6+4. Can you install the package (either directly after fetching it from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/ or waiting till it arrives to your favourite mirror). Does that help? BTW: Have you read README.Debian.gz where this problem is decribed and some methods fixing that are mentioned? Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 pgpmB2hl8VjNc.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#171795: openoffice.org: openoffice toolbars and menus all scrunched up and too small to use
Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.0.1-6 Severity: grave Tags: sid Justification: renders package unusable It looks like all the text in the toolbars and menus is size 0 or something. Maybe some typeface problem? Take a look for yourself: http://www.cybercom.net/~aj/Screenshot.png -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux oak 2.4.20 #1 Wed Dec 4 02:07:27 EST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on: ii openoffice.org-bin1.0.1-6OpenOffice.org office suite binary ii openoffice.org-debian-files 1.0.1-6+3 Debian specific parts of OpenOffic ii openoffice.org-l10n-en1.0.1-6english_us language package for op -- no debconf information
Re: Building the packages for Woody (1.0.1-6)
Jerome Warnier wrote: > Jerome Warnier wrote: > >> Chris Halls wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:56:26PM +0100, Jerome Warnier wrote: >>> >>> Any plans to backport to Woody? >>> >>> >>> >>> Of course, but the word 'unstable' is carefully chosen.. I will only >>> think >>> about doing a backport once the dust settles, and that will probably be >>> after I am reasonably happy that no new problems have arisen and have >>> made >>> an upload to unstable. >>> >>> >>> This version brings a lot of bug corrections that affect also Woody. I now have machines with enough disk space and power to compile it myself, but this version is not "buildable" as such. I'm trying to do it myself, but I run into some (small) problems: - why is a newer debhelper version needed? (is it really needed?) - do we really have to backport g++-3.2 to Woody, or is there another solution? >>> >>> >>> >>> Actually, it is more "buildable" than the previous version, because the >>> stlport problems have gone. It is best to build with gcc 3.0 so that >>> you do >>> not need to backport 3.2. Here is a quick guide: >>> >>> - Install the debhelper from here: >>> http://ftp.freenet.de/pub/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/testing/ >>> It is needed because the version of dh_install in Woody has a bug. >>> This >>> package backports the 2 line change that is needed to fix the problem. >>> >>> - Put this patch into debian/patches: >>> >>> http://cvs.debian.org/*checkout*/oo-deb/debian/patches/Attic/006_exception_sprecs.diff?rev=1.3&cvsroot=debian-openoffice&hideattic=0 >>> >>> >>> - Edit debian/control and change 'g++-3.2' to 'g++-3.0' >>> >>> - Edit debian/scripts/vars.i386 and change 'GCC3VER=3.2' to >>> 'GCC3VER=3.0' >>> >>> - Build :) >> > > Done all that. > >>> >> Done all this, but I still end up with different problems: >> >> The first one is a "permission denied" on excvpe for java_detect.sh. > > How is this, I still have this problem. It is just this script not being > executable, I fixed it by hand (chmod +x) after interrupting the build > process. > > >> >> The second one is that it asks for a strange question. >> Here you have the log: >> >> >> * * >> * Setting up the build environment variables.* >> * * >> >> >> $COMPATH=NO_COMPATH >> $_gcc_include_path=/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.0.4/include >> $_gxx_include_path=NO_GXX_INCLUDE >> $JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/j2se/1.3 >> $TCSH=/usr/bin >> $PERL=/usr/bin >> $x_libraries=/usr/X11R6/lib >> $x_includes=/usr/X11R6/include >> $_LOCAL_SOLENV=DEFAULT >> $_LOCAL_SOLVER=DEFAULT >> $upd=641 >> $CYGWIN=NO_CYGWIN >> $STLPORT4=NO_STLPORT4 >> $enable_xprint=TRUE >> $with_lang=,ALL, >> $with_asm_home=NO_ASM_HOME >> $with_unzip_home=NO_UNZIP_HOME >> $MINGWIN32=0 >> $with_use_shell=tcsh >> $USE_GCC3=TRUE >> $CC=gcc-3.0 >> $CXX=g++-3.0 >> >> Setting up the environment for building OpenOffice. >> Setting platform independent values... done >> Setting Linux Intel specific values... done >> NO_GXX_INCLUDE = no_gxx_include, NO_GXX_INCLUDE = argv(2) >> Please enter the g++ include path (e.g. /usr/include/g++-3): >> >> On my system, I happen to have a /usr/include/g++-3 and a >> /usr/include/g++-v3 directories. >> Which one should I choose? >> Why isn't that automated? > > > I still have this problem too. Where does it come from? > Is it Woody-related? > > This time, I tried with gcc-3.0 and ccache. > > Is it possible to build in parallel now? Is there still problems with > the build process? It would go *really* faster in my case, because I > could use a lot of machines in // (maybe 20!). > > So far it did not finish, but those bugs are still there. > I'll let you know tomorrow. > >>> There may be new problems - I haven't tested them yet - but that should >>> solve most build problems. >>> >>> >> Here you have some more to keep you busy ;-) >> >>> Chris >> One more problem, not related to previous ones. It seems the build process is looking anyway to g++ and not to g++-3.0. On Woody, it seems the package g++-3.0 doesn't provide a /usr/bin/g++. If g++-2.95 is not installed on your machine OOo doesn't build. Here you have a log of what fails: = Building project MathMLDTD = deliver -- version: 1.17.4.1 COPY: build.lst -> /tmp/openoffice.org-1.0.1/build-tree/oo_1.0.1_src/solver/641/unxlngi4.pro/inc/MathMLDTD/build.lst COPY: ../math.dtd -> /tmp/openoffice.org-1.0.1/build-tree/oo_1.0.1_src/solver/641/unxlngi4.pro/bin/math.dtd COPY: ../w3c_ipr_software_notice.html -> /tmp/openoffice.org-1.0.1/build-tree/oo_1.0.1_src/solver/641/unxlngi4.pro/bin/w3c_ipr_software_notice.html Statistics: Files copied: 3 Files unchanged/not matching: 3 = Bu
openoffice.org-debian/files
I do not know whether to report this as a bug against openoffice.org-debian-files or gnome-session, but it is a recurrent problem. Everytime, you upload a new openoffice.org-debian-files package, you of course overwrite /usr/bin/openoffice This script checks for the presence of gnome-session and if present unsets the session manager. Uunfortunately when I look at my /proc/PID/exe link, it says lrwxrwxrwx1 trs trs 0 Dec 4 17:14 exe -> /usr/bin/gnome-session.dpkg-new (deleted) I don't restart by gnome-session often, but after doing so once, the link seemed correct, but then gets changed by something to the link displayed above. This link is not removable even by root. At any rate, my short-term solution has been to comment out the if and fi statements and just unset the session manager, until the next upload of openoffice.org-debian-files which, as of late, has been quite frequent in sid. I thought I would at least start with you guys. Thanks Tom -- Thomas R. Shemanske (Mailing Address) (Office/Internet Information) Department of Mathematics 203 Choate House 6188 Bradley Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dartmouth College http://www.math.dartmouth.edu/~trs/ Hanover, NH 03755-3551 (603) 646 - 3179 Directions: http://www.math.dartmouth.edu/~trs/choatehouse.html Office hours: http://www.math.dartmouth.edu/~trs/frontmatter/office.html
Re: Bug#168778: marked as done (openoffice.org: Ugly trutype fonts in PPC build)
Chris, That was the problem. I had a set of files, fonts.dir, fonts.scale, etc in /usr/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType but there were no font files or symlinks to font files. After deleting these files in /usr/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType and doing a mkfontdir in that directory, which created an empty fonts.dir file, I am now able to enable the /usr/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType fontpath without breaking openoffice. I think we should reopen Bug#168778 however and move it back over to the msttcorefonts package. We should ask them to modify msttcorefonts to have a postinst script which removes encodings.dir, fonts.alias, fonts.dir and fonts.scale from /usr/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType and then does a mkfontdir in there afterwards. That will insure that no breakage gets left behind from older broken versions of msttcorefonts having been installed. Jack
Bug#171623: openoffice.org: OO crashes upon startup
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:19:50AM -0600, Alex Roitman wrote: > > On 2002.12.04 10:12 Chris Halls wrote: > > I've actully managed to reproduce the problem here with the -ru langpack. I > > also found that OOo runs if I set LANG=ru_RU. Your original bugreport > > suggests that you are using LANG=C. So does this work? > > > > $ sudo apt-get remove openoffice.org-l10n-en > > $ LANG=ru_RU openoffice > > Yes, this does start the openoffice alright. I've worked out that it will crash if LANG is not set to an installed language, and none of these language packs is installed (listed in search oder): -en (01) -?? (44) -de (49) external (99) > However, all the menu items fail to be displayed, probably it's trying to > use the font which doesn't support cyrillic charset. Oh well, I'll have to > figure that out. Oddly enough it worked without problems for me. I have these packages installed; maybe one will help you? ii ttf-freefont20021016-1 Freefont Serif, Sans and Mono Truetype fonts ii xfonts-base-transco 4.2.1-3 standard fonts for X (transcoded from ISO 10646-1) ii xfonts-cyrillic 4.2.1-3 Cyrillic fonts for X ii xfonts-75dpi-transc 4.2.1-3 75 dpi fonts for X (transcoded from ISO 10646-1) ii msttcorefonts 1.1.1 Installer for Microsoft TrueType core fonts ii x-ttcidfont-conf13 Configure TrueType and CID fonts for X. Chris
Bug#171713: marked as done (openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at: postrm tries to write non-existant /etc/openoffice.org directory)
Your message dated Wed, 04 Dec 2002 11:17:38 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#171713: fixed in openoffice.org-spellcheck-de 20020701-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2002 15:04:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 04 09:04:02 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from m132.adsl.tolna.net (narya.grin.hu) [195.38.113.132] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Jb4E-0004V7-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 09:04:02 -0600 Received: from grin by narya.grin.hu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18Jb3h-0003cy-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:03:29 +0100 From: Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at: postrm tries to write non-existant /etc/openoffice.org directory To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: grin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:03:29 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at Version: 20020701-2 Severity: normal narya:~# dpkg --remove openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at (Reading database ... 112933 files and directories currently installed.) Removing openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at ... ++ mktemp -q + TMP=/tmp/tmp.oQpWXJ + cat /etc/openoffice/dictionary.lst + sed '-es/DICT de AT de_AT//' + mv /tmp/tmp.oQpWXJ /etc/openoffice.org/dictionary.lst dpkg: error processing openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at (--remove): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at /etc/openoffice.org/ doesn't exist, /etc/openoffice/ does. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux narya 2.4.19-xfs #9 2002. nov. 18., hétfõ, 11.17.29 CET i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux Versions of the packages openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at depends on: ii openoffice.org 1.0.1-6high-quality office productivity suite --- Received: (at 171713-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2002 16:23:35 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 04 10:23:34 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18JcJC-0005WZ-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 10:23:34 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18JcDS-0004Mk-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 11:17:38 -0500 From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.28 $ Subject: Bug#171713: fixed in openoffice.org-spellcheck-de 20020701-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 11:17:38 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openoffice.org-spellcheck-de, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at_20020701-3_all.deb to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at_20020701-3_all.deb openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-ch_20020701-3_all.deb to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-ch_20020701-3_all.deb openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de_20020701-3_all.deb to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de_20020701-3_all.deb openoffice.org-spellcheck-de_20020701-3.diff.gz to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de_20020701-3.diff.gz openoffice.org-spellcheck-de_20020701-3.dsc to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de_20020701-3.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated openoffice.org-spellcheck-de package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fo
Processed: another reassign
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 165737 openoffice.org-help-en Bug#165737: openoffice.org-help-it conflicts with openoffice.org-help-en Bug reassigned from package `openoffice.org' to `openoffice.org-help-en'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: reassigning to -ar
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 155487 openoffice.org-l10n-ar Bug#155487: openoffice.org-l10n-ar conflicts with openoffice.org-l10n-en Bug reassigned from package `openoffice.org' to `openoffice.org-l10n-ar'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#171623: openoffice.org: OO crashes upon startup
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 09:31:29AM -0600, Alex Roitman wrote: > On 2002.12.04 09:21 Chris Halls wrote: > > Hmm, nothing that I recognise yet. Can you try installing the > > openoffice.org-l10n-en package and see if the problem is still there? Some > > langpack users have reported problems if -en is not installed. > > You know, it did help! Once I installed oo-l10n-en > the office does not crash anymore. Ah, that is good. > Would you like me to further play with it to determine > what exactly went wrong without oo-l10n-en? > > If it is in fact necessary, wouldn't it be a good idea > to declare a dependency on oo-l10n-en ? Well, declaring a dependency is a drastic solution and only the 'last resort' if all else fails. It means that everyone has to download and install the extra package because of a problem that a few people have. I've actully managed to reproduce the problem here with the -ru langpack. I also found that OOo runs if I set LANG=ru_RU. Your original bugreport suggests that you are using LANG=C. So does this work? $ sudo apt-get remove openoffice.org-l10n-en $ LANG=ru_RU openoffice Chris
Bug#171623: openoffice.org: OO crashes upon startup
On 2002.12.04 10:12 Chris Halls wrote: > I've actully managed to reproduce the problem here with the -ru langpack. I > also found that OOo runs if I set LANG=ru_RU. Your original bugreport > suggests that you are using LANG=C. So does this work? > > $ sudo apt-get remove openoffice.org-l10n-en > $ LANG=ru_RU openoffice Yes, this does start the openoffice alright. However, all the menu items fail to be displayed, probably it's trying to use the font which doesn't support cyrillic charset. Oh well, I'll have to figure that out. Alex -- Alexander Roitman Dept. of Neuroscience, Lions Research Building 2001 6th Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 Tel (612) 626-7280 FAX (612) 626-9201
openoffice.org-spellcheck-de_20020701-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at_20020701-3_all.deb to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at_20020701-3_all.deb openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-ch_20020701-3_all.deb to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-ch_20020701-3_all.deb openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de_20020701-3_all.deb to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de_20020701-3_all.deb openoffice.org-spellcheck-de_20020701-3.diff.gz to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de_20020701-3.diff.gz openoffice.org-spellcheck-de_20020701-3.dsc to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de_20020701-3.dsc Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 171713 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Re: Converting ispell aff format to myspell
Hi, Kevin.Hendricks wrote: > >Upstream has also some converters: > > > >http://whiteboard.openoffice.org/lingucomponent/dictionary.html > >(in the zip hidden in the link "standalone copy of myspell") > > > Yes and none of them are perfect. Many leave embedded tabs in places > that freak out myspell. > The first step in doing any conversion is to do the equivalent of an > emacs untabify on the file and then audit the entries to make sure the > correct counts are given throughout. I just saw them. Never tried them. > >I thought about packaging the libmyspell and the utilities but the > >license situation is unclear. Maybe I'll mail Kevin in the next days > >to resolve that. > > My how time flies! I tried to make this whole thing as "free" as > possible (both in beer and speech). > > MySpell is convered under a normal BSD license with absolutely no > advertising clause. It is covered under your choice of LGPL or SiSSL > if you so choose and via a submission to Kevin Atkinson's aspell, Mr. > Stallman himself granted it GPL status after asking me a bunch of > questions about how I wrote it. > Also, it was used as the basis for Mozilla in a completely rewritten > variant (with lots of Mozilla string classes flying around and io!) and > that version is available under the Mozilla tri-license. > > I just don't know how to make it any "free-er" than that. OK, that resolves all things. > My whole purpose in writing it to begin with was to better understand > affix compression (a learning exercise for me). > > So please do whatever you want with it. You will get no grief from me. > > No matter how it evolves, all I would like is to be mentioned in the > credits as its original author (a request not a requirement) and that > the original ispell authors be granted their dues as well. It's already mentioned in the README in the zip as I can see. > Hope this makes things a bit clearer. > > BTW, MySpell is statically linked with OOo and has no other interface > for parsing other forms of text and so is NO replacement for aspell in > any way. Its sole purpose was to fill a gap in the needs of OOo (and as > it turns out mozilla in a highly modified form) and anyone else who > needs or wants it. So I am not sure there is any demand for a library > version (you would be better off using Aspell for that). I thought primarily about the utils (are they under BSD as well?), secondly about the libmyspell.a Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 pgpRP9w5fO1Sn.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#171713: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at: postrm tries to write non-existant /etc/openoffice.org directory
Package: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at Version: 20020701-2 Severity: normal narya:~# dpkg --remove openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at (Reading database ... 112933 files and directories currently installed.) Removing openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at ... ++ mktemp -q + TMP=/tmp/tmp.oQpWXJ + cat /etc/openoffice/dictionary.lst + sed '-es/DICT de AT de_AT//' + mv /tmp/tmp.oQpWXJ /etc/openoffice.org/dictionary.lst dpkg: error processing openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at (--remove): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at /etc/openoffice.org/ doesn't exist, /etc/openoffice/ does. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux narya 2.4.19-xfs #9 2002. nov. 18., hétfõ, 11.17.29 CET i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux Versions of the packages openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at depends on: ii openoffice.org 1.0.1-6high-quality office productivity suite
Bug#171623: openoffice.org: OO crashes upon startup
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:58:51AM -0600, Alex Roitman wrote: > The stack trace is below. Anything else I can do > to help tracking it down? Please let me know. Hmm, nothing that I recognise yet. Can you try installing the openoffice.org-l10n-en package and see if the problem is still there? Some langpack users have reported problems if -en is not installed. Chris
Bug#171623: openoffice.org: OO crashes upon startup
On 2002.12.04 09:21 Chris Halls wrote: > Hmm, nothing that I recognise yet. Can you try installing the > openoffice.org-l10n-en package and see if the problem is still there? Some > langpack users have reported problems if -en is not installed. You know, it did help! Once I installed oo-l10n-en the office does not crash anymore. Would you like me to further play with it to determine what exactly went wrong without oo-l10n-en? If it is in fact necessary, wouldn't it be a good idea to declare a dependency on oo-l10n-en ? Anyway, thanks a lot and let mw know if I can help. Alex -- Alexander Roitman Dept. of Neuroscience, Lions Research Building 2001 6th Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 Tel (612) 626-7280 FAX (612) 626-9201 <171623@bugs.debian.org> <171623@bugs.debian.org>
Re: Bug#171586: ITP: myspanish -- The myspell spanish dictionary for openoffice
Kevin.Hendricks wrote: Hi, FYI, Richard Holt of the OpenOffice.org project already has built a Spanish dictionary for use by OpenOffice.org http://whiteboard.openoffice.org/lingucomponent/download_dictionary.html (see the es_ES.zip file release notes). He was one of the very first dictioanry contributors to OpenOffice.org and is now in charge of the lingucomponent website, dictionaries, etc. Perhaps you and he should get together and merge dictionaries so that there is one better Spanish dictionaries instead of multiple ones. [I already suscribed to the list, no need to cc me] Thanks for the pointer, Kevin. It is based in the same dict I use for ispell, so I find reasonable to make it come from the same source, with Richard aditions merged, but I still have to check it further. I will also use it to test my ispell2myspell converter to check whether it is really useful for anything else than having some fun programming. I obtain the same results for all but the W flag (except that I still keep comments on the right side), which in Richard's file is splitted. Is that done for readability or for a better loading? One side comment about the hyphenation file, the original tex file by Julio Sanchez is not GPL (see /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/hyphen/sphyph.tex). I do not if this affect the derived work done for openoffice, or if this latter can be regarded as an independent stuff. Cheers, Agustin -- = Agustin Martin Domingo, Dpto. de Fisica, ETS Arquitectura Madrid, (U. Politecnica de Madrid) tel: +34 91-336-6536, Fax: +34 91-336-6554, email:[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://corbu.aq.upm.es/~agmartin/welcome.html
Re: Converting ispell aff format to myspell
Hi, Upstream has also some converters: http://whiteboard.openoffice.org/lingucomponent/dictionary.html (in the zip hidden in the link "standalone copy of myspell") Yes and none of them are perfect. Many leave embedded tabs in places that freak out myspell. The first step in doing any conversion is to do the equivalent of an emacs untabify on the file and then audit the entries to make sure the correct counts are given throughout. There is now also preliminary support for compound words and simple replacement tables (to allow for phonetic corrections and things like that) which are documented only in the source and some readmes in the standalone version of myspell. I thought about packaging the libmyspell and the utilities but the license situation is unclear. Maybe I'll mail Kevin in the next days to resolve that. My how time flies! I tried to make this whole thing as "free" as possible (both in beer and speech). MySpell is convered under a normal BSD license with absolutely no advertising clause. It is covered under your choice of LGPL or SiSSL if you so choose and via a submission to Kevin Atkinson's aspell, Mr. Stallman himself granted it GPL status after asking me a bunch of questions about how I wrote it. Also, it was used as the basis for Mozilla in a completely rewritten variant (with lots of Mozilla string classes flying around and io!) and that version is available under the Mozilla tri-license. I just don't know how to make it any "free-er" than that. My whole purpose in writing it to begin with was to better understand affix compression (a learning exercise for me). So please do whatever you want with it. You will get no grief from me. No matter how it evolves, all I would like is to be mentioned in the credits as its original author (a request not a requirement) and that the original ispell authors be granted their dues as well. Hope this makes things a bit clearer. BTW, MySpell is statically linked with OOo and has no other interface for parsing other forms of text and so is NO replacement for aspell in any way. Its sole purpose was to fill a gap in the needs of OOo (and as it turns out mozilla in a highly modified form) and anyone else who needs or wants it. So I am not sure there is any demand for a library version (you would be better off using Aspell for that). Have fun! Kevin Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 Kevin B. Hendricks Associate Professor of Operations and Information Technology Richard Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario London Ontario, CANADA N6A 3K7 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#168778: marked as done (openoffice.org: Ugly trutype fonts in PPC build)
Hi Jack, On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 09:23:09AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote: > Is this really fixed for anyone? On my debian ppc sid box I am still having > problems. In my case, unless I comment the line... > > FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType" > > in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 leaving only... > > FontPath"/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType" > > I get no menus when openoffice starts up. I assume that the path fix in > this new openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4_all.deb doesn't require me > to trash my .openoffice directory in all the user accounts for the fix > to be functional, right? No, you don't have to trash .openoffice. The fix works by effectively appending /var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType, along with other well known font paths to the font path of OpenOffice. This means that OOo will now find fonts that are registered in defoma, but if you have problematic font paths in your XF86Config-4 then it is not solved because OOo reads them first. Can you check whether /usr/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType is really OK, and you don't have any dangling fonts.dir files that point to fonts that don't actually exist any more? Buggy versions of msttcorefonts did this. Chris pgplWMzAxZPYV.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#171623: openoffice.org: OO crashes upon startup
On 2002.12.04 05:10 Chris Halls wrote: > Please will you provide a stack trace for this problem? > > $ SAL_DEBUG=gdb openoffice > (gdb) run > [let it to crash] > (gdb) where > > ...and post the ouput of the stack trace. The stack trace is below. Anything else I can do to help tracking it down? Please let me know. #0 0x40b96c51 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x4099e98f in pthread_kill () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #2 0x4099ecae in raise () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #3 0x40b97c8a in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6 #4 0x403988ee in SalAbort(String const&) () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libvcl641li.so #5 0x40203d3f in Application::Abort(String const&) () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libvcl641li.so #6 0x0805cac9 in Desktop::Exception(unsigned short) () #7 0x40206514 in ImplVCLExceptionHandler::signal(oslSignalInfo*) () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libvcl641li.so #8 0x4055f2f8 in vos::_cpp_OSignalHandler_Function(void*, oslSignalInfo*) () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libvos2gcc3.so #9 0x4055f2d6 in _OSignalHandler_Function(void*, oslSignalInfo*) () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libvos2gcc3.so #10 0x4058a3dc in osl_releaseVolumeDeviceHandle () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libsal.so.3 #11 0x4058a77c in osl_raiseSignal () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libsal.so.3 #12 0x4055f4f6 in vos::OSignalHandler::raise(long, void*) () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libvos2gcc3.so #13 0x4050c9aa in InternalResMgr::FreeGlobalRes(void*, void*) () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libtl641li.so #14 0x4050cbf5 in ResMgr::Init(String const&) () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libtl641li.so #15 0x401fc8c3 in ResMgr::ResMgr(String const*) () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libvcl641li.so #16 0x4296e3a4 in SfxApplication::InitLabelResMgr(char const*) () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libsfx641li.so #17 0x433ca630 in OfficeApplication::OfficeApplication() () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libofa641li.so #18 0x41d7b158 in OfficeWrapper::OfficeWrapper(com::sun::star::uno::Reference const&) () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libwrp641li.so #19 0x41d7ad9e in OfficeWrapper_CreateInstance(com::sun::star::uno::Reference const&) () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libwrp641li.so #20 0x40466f05 in cppu::createStandardClassWithSequence(com::sun::star::uno::Reference const&, rtl::OUString const&,---Type to continue, or q to quit--- com::sun::star::uno::Reference const&, com::sun::star::uno::Sequence const&) () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libcppuhelper3gcc3.so #21 0x404670d3 in cppu::createStandardClassWithSequence(com::sun::star::uno::Reference const&, rtl::OUString const&, com::sun::star::uno::Reference const&, com::sun::star::uno::Sequence const&) () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libcppuhelper3gcc3.so #22 0x40467dab in cppu::createStandardClassWithSequence(com::sun::star::uno::Reference const&, rtl::OUString const&, com::sun::star::uno::Reference const&, com::sun::star::uno::Sequence const&) () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libcppuhelper3gcc3.so #23 0x40467143 in cppu::createStandardClassWithSequence(com::sun::star::uno::Reference const&, rtl::OUString const&, com::sun::star::uno::Reference const&, com::sun::star::uno::Sequence const&) () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libcppuhelper3gcc3.so #24 0x40467f00 in cppu::createStandardClassWithSequence(com::sun::star::uno::Reference const&, rtl::OUString const&, com::sun::star::uno::Reference const&, com::sun::star::uno::Sequence const&) () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libcppuhelper3gcc3.so #25 0x404686fd in cppu::createStandardClassWithSequence(com::sun::star::uno::Reference const&, rtl::OUString const&, com::sun::star::uno::Reference const&, com::sun::star::uno::Sequence const&) () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libcppuhelper3gcc3.so #26 0x40e742c6 in component_getDescriptionFunc () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libsmgr.so #27 0x40e74601 in component_getDescriptionFunc () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libsmgr.so #28 0x0805ea34 in Desktop::Main() () #29 0x402065d1 in SVMain() () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libvcl641li.so #30 0x4038ea0c in main () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libvcl641li.so #31 0x40b85a5f in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 -- Alexander Roitman Dept. of Neuroscience, Lions Research Building 2001 6th Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 Tel (612) 626-7280 FAX (612) 626-9201
Re: Converting ispell aff format to myspell
Hi, Hi Agustin, hi *, Agustín Martín Domingo wrote: > Just looking for info about aff converters to myspell, > > I have currently seen two converters, one in the debian myhungarian > package, written in shell script and another in python at > > http://sraige.mif.vu.lt/cvs/ispell-lt/tools/ispell2myspell.py?annotate=1.1&sortby=author > > I am also finishing one in perl that needs only some fine tuning and > extensive testing. Upstream has also some converters: http://whiteboard.openoffice.org/lingucomponent/dictionary.html (in the zip hidden in the link "standalone copy of myspell") I thought about packaging the libmyspell and the utilities but the license situation is unclear. Maybe I'll mail Kevin in the next days to resolve that. Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 pgpD4ljNracK8.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug#171586: ITP: myspanish -- The myspell spanish dictionary for openoffice
Hi, FYI, Richard Holt of the OpenOffice.org project already has built a Spanish dictionary for use by OpenOffice.org http://whiteboard.openoffice.org/lingucomponent/download_dictionary.html (see the es_ES.zip file release notes). He was one of the very first dictioanry contributors to OpenOffice.org and is now in charge of the lingucomponent website, dictionaries, etc. Perhaps you and he should get together and merge dictionaries so that there is one better Spanish dictionaries instead of multiple ones. Kevin On Wednesday, December 4, 2002, at 09:15 AM, Agustín Martín Domingo wrote: Rene Engelhard wrote: Agustin Martin Domingo wrote: Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-03 Severity: wishlist * Package name: myspanish (or openoffice.org-spellcheck-es-es) Are there any branches of this? For the official language supposedly not. For the dayly use many, but dicts are supposed to match the official. I mean, are there spanish for spain, spanish for x, spanish for y? If yes, there is openoffice.org-spellcheck-es- If no, you can let it openoffice.org-spellcheck-es Thanks, I though I read somewhere that future mozilla versions might also use myspell and there was a possible renaming, but rereading that now it only spoke about separating them from the openoffice package Please see the openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-* packages how to get the right control fields (we have some internal virtual packages). If you have any questions, ask on debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org, please. ( I would recommend to subscribe there as you are going to maintain a package closely related to openoffice.org ) Done (no need to cc me if replying) -- = Agustin Martin Domingo, Dpto. de Fisica, ETS Arquitectura Madrid, (U. Politecnica de Madrid) tel: +34 91-336-6536, Fax: +34 91-336-6554, email:[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://corbu.aq.upm.es/~agmartin/welcome.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kevin B. Hendricks Associate Professor of Operations and Information Technology Richard Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario London Ontario, CANADA N6A 3K7 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Converting ispell aff format to myspell
Hi all, Just looking for info about aff converters to myspell, I have currently seen two converters, one in the debian myhungarian package, written in shell script and another in python at http://sraige.mif.vu.lt/cvs/ispell-lt/tools/ispell2myspell.py?annotate=1.1&sortby=author I am also finishing one in perl that needs only some fine tuning and extensive testing. Any more info I am missing about converters? Cheers, Agustin -- = Agustin Martin Domingo, Dpto. de Fisica, ETS Arquitectura Madrid, (U. Politecnica de Madrid) tel: +34 91-336-6536, Fax: +34 91-336-6554, email:[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://corbu.aq.upm.es/~agmartin/welcome.html
Re: Bug#171586: ITP: myspanish -- The myspell spanish dictionary for openoffice
Rene Engelhard wrote: Hmm & hi again, myself forgot for a short time that I wrote this document ;) http://people.debian.org/~rene/debian/openoffice.org/spellcheck-pkg-guide/ I am also involved in the new Debian ispell dictionaries and wordlists policy. Since this openoffice document has been moved to the CVS, is any canonical location for it? I mean, we could include in the ispell and wordlists document something like: This policy does not cover the myspell dictionaries for openoffice. For information about the policy for that dictionaries please see -- = Agustin Martin Domingo, Dpto. de Fisica, ETS Arquitectura Madrid, (U. Politecnica de Madrid) tel: +34 91-336-6536, Fax: +34 91-336-6554, email:[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://corbu.aq.upm.es/~agmartin/welcome.html
re: Bug#168778: marked as done (openoffice.org: Ugly trutype fonts in PPC build)
Is this really fixed for anyone? On my debian ppc sid box I am still having problems. In my case, unless I comment the line... FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType" in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 leaving only... FontPath"/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType" I get no menus when openoffice starts up. I assume that the path fix in this new openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4_all.deb doesn't require me to trash my .openoffice directory in all the user accounts for the fix to be functional, right? I have msttcorefonts installed with the following in /var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 41 Dec 3 20:22 Andale_Mono.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Andale_Mono.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 35 Dec 3 20:22 Arial.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Arial.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 41 Dec 3 20:22 Arial_Black.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Arial_Black.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 40 Dec 3 20:22 Arial_Bold.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Arial_Bold.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 47 Dec 3 20:22 Arial_Bold_Italic.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Arial_Bold_Italic.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 42 Dec 3 20:22 Arial_Italic.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Arial_Italic.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 43 Dec 3 20:22 Comic_Sans_MS.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Comic_Sans_MS.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 48 Dec 3 20:22 Comic_Sans_MS_Bold.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Comic_Sans_MS_Bold.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 41 Dec 3 20:22 Courier_New.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Courier_New.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 46 Dec 3 20:22 Courier_New_Bold.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Courier_New_Bold.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 53 Dec 3 20:22 Courier_New_Bold_Italic.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Courier_New_Bold_Italic.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 48 Dec 3 20:22 Courier_New_Italic.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Courier_New_Italic.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 37 Dec 3 20:22 Georgia.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Georgia.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 42 Dec 3 20:22 Georgia_Bold.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Georgia_Bold.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 49 Dec 3 20:22 Georgia_Bold_Italic.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Georgia_Bold_Italic.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 44 Dec 3 20:22 Georgia_Italic.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Georgia_Italic.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 36 Dec 3 20:22 Impact.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Impact.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 45 Dec 3 20:22 Times_New_Roman.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Times_New_Roman.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 50 Dec 3 20:22 Times_New_Roman_Bold.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Times_New_Roman_Bold.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 57 Dec 3 20:22 Times_New_Roman_Bold_Italic.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Times_New_Roman_Bold_Italic.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 52 Dec 3 20:22 Times_New_Roman_Italic.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Times_New_Roman_Italic.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 42 Dec 3 20:22 Trebuchet_MS.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Trebuchet_MS.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 47 Dec 3 20:22 Trebuchet_MS_Bold.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Trebuchet_MS_Bold.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 54 Dec 3 20:22 Trebuchet_MS_Bold_Italic.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Trebuchet_MS_Bold_Italic.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 49 Dec 3 20:22 Trebuchet_MS_Italic.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Trebuchet_MS_Italic.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 37 Dec 3 20:22 Verdana.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Verdana.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 42 Dec 3 20:22 Verdana_Bold.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Verdana_Bold.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 49 Dec 3 20:22 Verdana_Bold_Italic.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Verdana_Bold_Italic.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 44 Dec 3 20:22 Verdana_Italic.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Verdana_Italic.ttf lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 38 Dec 3 20:22 Webdings.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Webdings.ttf -rw-r--r--1 root root 3141 Dec 3 20:22 encodings.dir -rw-r--r--1 root root0 Dec 3 20:22 fonts.alias -rw-r--r--1 root root22624 Dec 3 20:22 fonts.dir -rw-r--r--1 root root22624 Dec 3 20:22 fonts.scale Anyone else seeing this problem? Once I comment FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType" in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4, openoffice runs fine and I can see the text in all the menus. So it seems this fix doesn't totally suffice. Jack
Re: Bug#171586: ITP: myspanish -- The myspell spanish dictionary for openoffice
Rene Engelhard wrote: Agustin Martin Domingo wrote: Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-03 Severity: wishlist * Package name: myspanish (or openoffice.org-spellcheck-es-es) Are there any branches of this? For the official language supposedly not. For the dayly use many, but dicts are supposed to match the official. I mean, are there spanish for spain, spanish for x, spanish for y? If yes, there is openoffice.org-spellcheck-es- If no, you can let it openoffice.org-spellcheck-es Thanks, I though I read somewhere that future mozilla versions might also use myspell and there was a possible renaming, but rereading that now it only spoke about separating them from the openoffice package Please see the openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-* packages how to get the right control fields (we have some internal virtual packages). If you have any questions, ask on debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org, please. ( I would recommend to subscribe there as you are going to maintain a package closely related to openoffice.org ) Done (no need to cc me if replying) -- = Agustin Martin Domingo, Dpto. de Fisica, ETS Arquitectura Madrid, (U. Politecnica de Madrid) tel: +34 91-336-6536, Fax: +34 91-336-6554, email:[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://corbu.aq.upm.es/~agmartin/welcome.html
cvs commit to oo-deb/debian by haggai
Repository: oo-deb/debian who:haggai time: Wed Dec 4 13:34:14 UTC 2002 Log Message: * Using freetype from Debian again - 903_system_freetype.diff. This change happened in -6 but was missing from the changelog. Added build-depdendency libfreetype6-dev. * debian/rules: chmod a+x our scripts in build.prepare * debian/README: s/source.patch/source.make Files: changed:README changelog control control.in rules
cvs commit to oo-deb/debian/patches by haggai
Repository: oo-deb/debian/patches who:haggai time: Wed Dec 4 13:18:24 UTC 2002 Log Message: Add system freetype back in (this actually made it into -6 accidentally :) Files: added: 903_system_freetype.diff
Bug#170044: mistake
close 171691 thanks Hi, the whole things were intended for 170044, not for 170004. Sorry. Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Processed: glibc issue
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 170044 -1 Bug#170044: openoffice.org: All OO programs crash with "relocation error" Bug 170044 cloned as bug 171695. > severity -1 critical Bug#171695: openoffice.org: All OO programs crash with "relocation error" Severity set to `critical'. > tag -1 + sid Bug#171695: openoffice.org: All OO programs crash with "relocation error" Tags were: help sid Tags added: sid > retitle -1 relocation errors at OOo with libc6 2.3.1 Bug#171695: openoffice.org: All OO programs crash with "relocation error" Changed Bug title. > reassign -1 libc6 Bug#171695: relocation errors at OOo with libc6 2.3.1 Bug reassigned from package `openoffice.org' to `libc6'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#168778: marked as done (openoffice.org: Ugly trutype fonts in PPC build)
Your message dated Wed, 04 Dec 2002 06:32:13 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#168778: fixed in openoffice.org-debian-files 1.0.1-6+4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Nov 2002 12:02:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 12 06:02:44 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 015.atlasinternet.net (antoli.gallimedina.net) [212.9.93.15] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18BZkh-0001NH-00; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 06:02:44 -0600 Received: from sofi.gallimedina.net ([192.168.0.9] helo=localhost ident=mail) by antoli.gallimedina.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18BZkg-J4-00; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:02:42 +0100 Received: from gallir by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18BZke-0001um-00; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:02:40 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ricardo Galli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: openoffice.org: Ugly trutype fonts in PPC build X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:02:40 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Ricardo Galli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.0.1-5.6rc1 Severity: normal As it happened with previous versions, TT fonts are shown ugly in PPC yet. Testes with the same XftConfig and the same fonts (msttcorefonts) as in my x86 machine. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux sofi 2.4.20-rc1-ben0 #1 Sat Nov 9 21:18:13 CET 2002 ppc Locale: LANG=es_ES, LC_CTYPE=es_ES Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on: ii openoffice.org-bin1.0.1-5.6rc1 OpenOffice.org office suite binary ii openoffice.org-debian-fil 1.0.1-5+6rc1.1 OpenOffice.org office suite (addit ii openoffice.org-l10n-en1.0.1-5.6rc1 english_us language package for op -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 168778-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2002 11:38:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 04 05:38:03 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18JXqt-0006fd-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 05:38:03 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18JXlF-0005xo-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 06:32:13 -0500 From: Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.28 $ Subject: Bug#168778: fixed in openoffice.org-debian-files 1.0.1-6+4 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 06:32:13 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openoffice.org-debian-files, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4.dsc to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4.dsc openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4.tar.gz to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4.tar.gz openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4_all.deb to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated openoffice.org-debian-files package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 11:07:50 +0100 Source: openoffice.org-debian-files Binary: openoffice.org-debian-files Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.1-6+4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian OpenOffice Team Changed-By: Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: openoff
Bug#168780: marked as done (openoffice.org: Languages, dictionaries and spelling preferences are not stored)
Your message dated Wed, 04 Dec 2002 06:32:13 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#168780: fixed in openoffice.org-debian-files 1.0.1-6+4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Nov 2002 12:09:29 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 12 06:09:27 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 015.atlasinternet.net (antoli.gallimedina.net) [212.9.93.15] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18BZrD-0001hK-00; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 06:09:27 -0600 Received: from sofi.gallimedina.net ([192.168.0.9] helo=localhost ident=mail) by antoli.gallimedina.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18BZrB-KC-00; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:09:25 +0100 Received: from gallir by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18BZrB-0001vJ-00; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:09:25 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ricardo Galli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: openoffice.org: Languages, dictionaries and spelling preferences are not stored X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:09:25 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Ricardo Galli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.0.1-5.6rc1 Severity: normal The default language (Western) and the dictionaries (Writing Aids) preferences are not stored. Tested with "Locale Setting: Spanish (Spain)", "Default currency: Euro Spanish". Try to add a dictionary by selecting it in "Writing Aids" and check "OpenOffice MySpell SpellChecker", then change the default language. When the program is restarted, all options are lost. It happens in both, x86 and PPC architecture, in the RC versions and previous. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux sofi 2.4.20-rc1-ben0 #1 Sat Nov 9 21:18:13 CET 2002 ppc Locale: LANG=es_ES, LC_CTYPE=es_ES Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on: ii openoffice.org-bin1.0.1-5.6rc1 OpenOffice.org office suite binary ii openoffice.org-debian-fil 1.0.1-5+6rc1.1 OpenOffice.org office suite (addit ii openoffice.org-l10n-en1.0.1-5.6rc1 english_us language package for op -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 168780-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2002 11:38:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 04 05:38:02 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18JXqs-0006fQ-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 05:38:02 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18JXlF-0005xq-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 06:32:13 -0500 From: Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.28 $ Subject: Bug#168780: fixed in openoffice.org-debian-files 1.0.1-6+4 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 06:32:13 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openoffice.org-debian-files, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4.dsc to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4.dsc openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4.tar.gz to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4.tar.gz openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4_all.deb to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated openoffice.org-debian-files package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSA
Bug#171367: marked as done (No fonts + menus if msttcorefonts + x-ttcidfont-conf.d is badly configured)
Your message dated Wed, 04 Dec 2002 06:32:13 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#171367: fixed in openoffice.org-debian-files 1.0.1-6+4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 2002 21:32:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 01 15:32:02 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 04-admin.deltav.hu (lgb.hu) [213.163.4.100] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Ibh3-0004Dg-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 15:32:01 -0600 Received: (qmail 4464 invoked by uid 1000); 1 Dec 2002 21:31:57 - Date: 1 Dec 2002 21:31:57 - Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: openoffice.org: does not work at all! To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.0.1-6 Severity: normal Hi! Just tried out openoffice.org with simply issung command "apt-get install openoffice.org". After apt-get I tried to start oo with command ooffice, and I got this in my xterm: SIOCGIFADDR got '00:00:00:00:00:00' sh: line 1: /usr/sbin/lpc: No such file or directory sh: line 1: lpc: command not found sh: line 1: lpstat: command not found When running at root (sudo) I get a totally empty registration window. Running as root I get the it, but almost all of the icons, menus at are empty, or only one line sized in height (including tooltips). What's going on? What have I missed? I tried this on three computers, all of them resulted in this problem ;-( -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux equinoxe 2.4.20-rc2 #1 Sat Nov 16 13:18:20 CET 2002 i586 unknown unknown GNU/Linux Versions of the packages openoffice.org depends on: ii openoffice.org 1.0.1-6+1 Debian specific parts of OpenOffice.org pack ii openoffice.org 1.0.1-6english_us language package for openoffice.o ii openoffice.org 1.0.1-6OpenOffice.org office suite binary files openoffice.org-l10n-ar Not installed or no info openoffice.org-l10n-da Not installed or no info openoffice.org-l10n-de Not installed or no info openoffice.org-l10n-el Not installed or no info openoffice.org-l10n-es Not installed or no info openoffice.org-l10n-fr Not installed or no info openoffice.org-l10n-it Not installed or no info openoffice.org-l10n-ja Not installed or no info openoffice.org-l10n-ko Not installed or no info openoffice.org-l10n-nl Not installed or no info openoffice.org-l10n-pl Not installed or no info openoffice.org-l10n-pt Not installed or no info openoffice.org-l10n-ru Not installed or no info openoffice.org-l10n-sv Not installed or no info openoffice.org-l10n-tr Not installed or no info openoffice.org-l10n-zh-cn Not installed or no info openoffice.org-l10n-zh-tw Not installed or no info --- Received: (at 171367-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2002 11:38:09 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 04 05:38:09 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18JXqz-0006gd-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 05:38:09 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18JXlF-0005xs-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 06:32:13 -0500 From: Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.28 $ Subject: Bug#171367: fixed in openoffice.org-debian-files 1.0.1-6+4 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 06:32:13 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openoffice.org-debian-files, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4.dsc to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4.dsc openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4.tar.gz to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4.tar.gz openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4_all.deb to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be close
openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4.dsc to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4.dsc openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4.tar.gz to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4.tar.gz openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4_all.deb to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+4_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 168778 168780 171367 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#171623: openoffice.org: OO crashes upon startup
tags 171623 + moreinfo severity 171623 normal thanks On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 02:54:37PM -0600, Alex Roitman wrote: > When I attempt to launch any OO program I get the following: > > $ openoffice > Gnome session manager detected - session management disabled > Application ErrorAborted Please will you provide a stack trace for this problem? $ SAL_DEBUG=gdb openoffice (gdb) run [let it to crash] (gdb) where ...and post the ouput of the stack trace. Thanks, Chris
cvs commit to guides/spellcheck-packaging by rene
Repository: guides/spellcheck-packaging who:rene time: Wed Dec 4 11:18:20 UTC 2002 Log Message: - add ps; so everybody does not need to run latex himself if he wants to read the document's version in CVS - added script creating only the pdf. run it after editing changes and check in the .tex and .ps at the same time... Files: added: create_ps.sh ooo-spellcheck-pkg-guide.ps
Processed: Re: Bug#171623: openoffice.org: OO crashes upon startup
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 171623 + moreinfo Bug#171623: openoffice.org: OO crashes upon startup Tags were: sid Tags added: moreinfo > severity 171623 normal Bug#171623: openoffice.org: OO crashes upon startup Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
cvs commit to oo-debian-files/debian by haggai
Repository: oo-debian-files/debian who:haggai time: Wed Dec 4 11:17:33 UTC 2002 Log Message: Release version 4 Files: changed:changelog
cvs commit to oo-debian-files/debian by rene
Repository: oo-debian-files/debian who:rene time: Wed Dec 4 08:50:36 UTC 2002 Log Message: add changelog entry tor more wrapper script fixes in regard of saving the settings Files: changed:changelog
Re: Bug#171586: ITP: myspanish -- The myspell spanish dictionary for openoffice
Hmm & hi again, myself forgot for a short time that I wrote this document ;) Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > [ Cc:'ing Debian OpenOffice Mailinglist ] > > Agustin Martin Domingo wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-03 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > * Package name: myspanish (or openoffice.org-spellcheck-es-es) > > * License : (GPL) > > Description : The myspell spanish dictionary for openoffice > > > > This is simply a reservation to notify that I plan to prepare a myspell > > spanish openoffice dictionary from the same sources as current ispell > > package > > ispanish. License and so on are the same as ispanish, GPL, as well as > > upstream authors and so on. Naming will depend on openoffice naming policy. http://people.debian.org/~rene/debian/openoffice.org/spellcheck-pkg-guide/ Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 pgp0YPOeaoQ1x.pgp Description: PGP signature
