Bug#295831: marked as done (openoffice.org-kde depends on an unavailable package)

2005-02-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:26:27 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#295831: openoffice.org-kde depends on an unavailable 
package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Feb 2005 12:38:24 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 18 04:38:22 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from (laptop) [210.18.182.33] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D27On-0005SJ-00; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:38:21 -0800
Received: by laptop (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 53CE8C2E17; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:12:58 +0530 (IST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ritesh Raj Sarraf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: openoffice.org-kde depends on an unavailable package
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:12:58 +0530
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: openoffice.org-kde
Version: 1.1.3-4
Severity: minor


openoffice.org-kde depends on an unavailable package openoffice.org-bin
version = 1.1.2+1.1.3 where as on sarge the candidate is 1.1.2dfsg1-3
which makes openoffice.org-kde uninstallable.

Regards,

Ritesh
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10mbl-bsplash-2.6.10-4
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages openoffice.org-kde depends on:
ii  kdelibs4 4:3.3.2-1   KDE core libraries
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1  1:3.4.3-6   GCC support library
ii  libqt3c102-mt3:3.3.3-8   Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.5-8   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libstlport4.64.6.2-2 STLport C++ class library
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li
ii  openoffice.org-bin   1.1.2dfsg1-3OpenOffice.org office suite binary
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu

---
Received: (at 295831-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2005 08:27:00 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 00:27:00 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from imap.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D2Px5-0003tX-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 00:27:00 -0800
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2005 08:26:27 -
Received: from dsl-084-056-102-198.arcor-ip.net (EHLO localhost) (84.56.102.198)
  by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 19 Feb 2005 09:26:27 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1545045
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 164101C039; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:26:27 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:26:27 +0100
From: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#295831: openoffice.org-kde depends on an unavailable package
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=H1spWtNR+x+ondvy
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-PGP-Key: 248AEB73
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Organization: The Debian Project
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--H1spWtNR+x+ondvy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
 openoffice.org-kde depends on an unavailable package openoffice.org-bin
 version =3D 1.1.2+1.1.3 where as on sarge the candidate is 

Bug#295900: Depends on gnomelibs

2005-02-19 Thread Alex Romosan
Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 WTF? did you not reopen the old bug but file a new one?

sorry, i get really annoyed when people close a bug without actually
fixing it (and in this case introducing it since it wasn't there
before, at least for i386). isn't this the debian way? :-(

--alex--

-- 
| I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active |
|  advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with  |
|  automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion  |
|  and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. |


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#295900: Depends on gnomelibs

2005-02-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi.

Alex Romosan wrote:
 Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  WTF? did you not reopen the old bug but file a new one?
 
 sorry, i get really annoyed when people close a bug without actually
 fixing it (and in this case introducing it since it wasn't there

gar. Get a clue. We mentioned in the changelog so we thought that
revision would fix it. The necessary debian/* changes *are* there.
Unfortunately we forgot the ooo-build parts and it shlipped through my
testing. Humans make errors, don't they?

Still still is no reason why you simply couln't have reopened the old
bug but but have to file a new one.

 before, at least for i386). isn't this the debian way? :-(

This bug was there before, it just didn't show up because it somehow
shows up only *sometimes* (timestsmp skew and so..).

The bugfix done in 1.1.3-5 was incomplete, so the the i386 deb now also depends 
on gnomevfs where was only there on powerpc and s390 before.

As I said, humans make errors... That's why it's called unstable.

It'll be fixed in the next upload which will come soon.

Grüße/Regards,

René
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
  


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


CVS:oo-deb/debian changelog,1.427,1.428

2005-02-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Update of /cvs/debian-openoffice/oo-deb/debian
In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv14954

Modified Files:
changelog 
Log Message:
mention fixed vfs-uno-uri.diff

Index: changelog
===
RCS file: /cvs/debian-openoffice/oo-deb/debian/changelog,v
retrieving revision 1.427
retrieving revision 1.428
diff -u -d -r1.427 -r1.428
--- changelog   18 Feb 2005 10:24:11 -  1.427
+++ changelog   19 Feb 2005 18:10:25 -  1.428
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+openoffice.org (1.1.3-6) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * Brown paper bag release.
+  * Modified patches:
+- vfs-uno-uri.diff: actually add USE_GNOMEVFS confitional
+  (closes: #293351) [RE]
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:01:15 +0100
+
 openoffice.org (1.1.3-5) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * New patches:


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of openoffice.org_1.1.3-6_source+i386+all.changes

2005-02-19 Thread Archive Administrator
openoffice.org_1.1.3-6_source+i386+all.changes uploaded successfully to 
localhost
along with the files:
  openoffice.org-l10n-ru_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-ja_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-thesaurus-en-us_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-cy_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-sk_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-nb_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-tr_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-gl_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-eu_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org_1.1.3-6.diff.gz
  openoffice.org-l10n-hu_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-lt_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-bin_1.1.3-6_i386.deb
  openoffice.org_1.1.3-6.dsc
  openoffice.org-l10n-sl_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-he_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-da_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-nl_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-it_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  ttf-opensymbol_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-ko_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-cs_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-fi_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-pt-br_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-pt_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-ca_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_1.1.3-6_i386.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-zu_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-ns_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-ar_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-et_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-af_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-de_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-sv_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-zh-cn_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-pl_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-zh-tw_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-en_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-hi_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-fr_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-es_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.3-6_i386.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-th_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-gnomevfs_1.1.3-6_i386.deb
  openoffice.org-mimelnk_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-kn_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-kde_1.1.3-6_i386.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-tn_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-nn_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  openoffice.org-dev_1.1.3-6_i386.deb
  openoffice.org-l10n-el_1.1.3-6_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#293551: marked as done (openoffice.org-bin: Depends on gnomelibs.)

2005-02-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:04:57 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#293551: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.3-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2005 10:12:05 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 04 02:12:05 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from godzilla.funcform.se (fortet.funcform.se) [62.65.122.146] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cx0RY-000155-00; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 02:12:04 -0800
Received: from hoshi.netintact.se ([217.73.97.28] helo=chernushka)
by fortet.funcform.se with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Cx0RW-0002tg-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:12:02 +0100
Received: from andersg by chernushka with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1Cx0RR-xW-FL
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:11:57 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Anders Gustafsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: openoffice.org-bin: Depends on gnomelibs.
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:11:57 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: openoffice.org-bin
Severity: normal


openoffice.org-bin depends on libbonobo2-0 (= 2.8.0)
openoffice.org-bin depends on libgnomevfs2-0 (= 2.8.3-7)

I don't want to bloat my system with gnome-libs.
What happend to the openoffice.org-gnomevfs package?


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers experimental
  APT policy: (1001, 'experimental'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages openoffice.org-bin depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]1.4.42  Debian configuration management sy
ii  libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libaudio21.7-2   The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
pn  libbonobo2-0 Not found.
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcurl3 7.12.3-2Multi-protocol file transfer libra
ii  libdb4.2++   4.2.52-18   Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries f
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1  1:4.0-0pre4 GCC support library
ii  libgconf2-4  2.8.1-4 GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.6.1-3 The GLib library of C routines
pn  libgnomevfs2-0   Not found.
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libmyspell3  1:3.1-10MySpell spellchecking library
ii  libneon230.23.9.dfsg.3-3 An HTTP and WebDAV client library 
ii  liborbit21:2.10.2-1.1libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstartup-notification0 0.8-1   library for program launch feedbac
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.5-8   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libstlport4.64.6.2-2 STLport C++ class library
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxaw7  4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Athena widget set library
ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxt6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Toolkit Intrinsics
pn  openoffice.org   Not found.
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-4   compression library - runtime

---
Received: (at 293551-close) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2005 00:08:10 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 16:08:10 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D2edt-0001DY-00; 

openoffice.org_1.1.3-6_source+i386+all.changes ACCEPTED

2005-02-19 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
openoffice.org-bin_1.1.3-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-bin_1.1.3-6_i386.deb
openoffice.org-dev_1.1.3-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dev_1.1.3-6_i386.deb
openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.3-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.3-6_i386.deb
openoffice.org-gnomevfs_1.1.3-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gnomevfs_1.1.3-6_i386.deb
openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_1.1.3-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_1.1.3-6_i386.deb
openoffice.org-kde_1.1.3-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-kde_1.1.3-6_i386.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-af_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-af_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-ar_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-ar_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-ca_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-ca_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-cs_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-cs_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-cy_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-cy_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-da_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-da_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-de_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-de_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-el_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-el_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-en_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-en_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-es_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-es_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-et_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-et_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-eu_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-eu_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-fi_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-fi_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-fr_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-fr_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-gl_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-gl_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-he_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-he_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-hi_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-hi_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-hu_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-hu_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-it_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-it_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-ja_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-ja_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-kn_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-kn_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-ko_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-ko_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-lt_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-lt_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-nb_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-nb_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-nl_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-nl_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-nn_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-nn_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-ns_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-ns_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-pl_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-pl_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-pt-br_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-pt-br_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-pt_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-pt_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-ru_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-ru_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-sk_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-sk_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-sl_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-sl_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-sv_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-sv_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-th_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-th_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-tn_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-tn_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-tr_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-tr_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-zh-cn_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-zh-cn_1.1.3-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-zh-tw_1.1.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-zh-tw_1.1.3-6_all.deb

Bug#295900: marked as done (Depends on gnomelibs)

2005-02-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:04:57 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#293551: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.3-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Feb 2005 21:17:50 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 18 13:17:49 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from caliban.lbl.gov [128.3.11.38] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D2FVV-0004bm-00; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:17:49 -0800
Received: from caliban.lbl.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by caliban.lbl.gov (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j1ILHnmS022638
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:17:49 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by caliban.lbl.gov (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j1ILHmk8022634;
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:17:48 -0800
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alex Romosan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Depends on gnomelibs
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:17:48 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: openoffice.org-bin
Version: 1.1.3-5
Severity: important

bug #293551 complained about the same thing and it got closed with the
following explanation: build gnomevfs library sanely. obviously this
is not corect as the package suddenly (at least on i386) depends on
gnome libraries. please fix.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-rc4
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages openoffice.org-bin depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]1.4.45  Debian configuration management sy
ii  libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libaudio21.7-2   The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcurl3 7.13.0-1Multi-protocol file transfer libra
ii  libdb4.2++   4.2.52-18   Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries f
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1  1:3.4.3-9   GCC support library
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libmyspell3  1:3.1-10MySpell spellchecking library
ii  libneon230.23.9.dfsg.3-2 An HTTP and WebDAV client library 
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstartup-notification0 0.8-1   library for program launch feedbac
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.5-8   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libstlport4.64.6.2-2 STLport C++ class library
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxaw7  4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Athena widget set library
ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxt6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  openoffice.org   1.1.3-5 high-quality office productivity s
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-11 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-4   compression library - runtime

-- debconf information:
* openoffice.org-bin/prelink: false

---
Received: (at 293551-close) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2005 00:08:10 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 16:08:10 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D2edt-0001DY-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:08:09 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D2ean-0004zS-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:04:57 -0500
From: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#293551: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.3-6
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL 

Bug#295916: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#295916: openoffice.org-bin: installs unstripped (huge) binaries)

2005-02-19 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:

 ca. 40 M - 60M. How's that 60M bigger?

For the record, I was referring to Installed-Size, not Size, and
probably should have been clearer about that.  At any rate, it was
about a 50% increase either way.

 It's now at the old size again (-6) - fixed - close.

OK, thanks for fixing it promptly.

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#293767: marked as done (openoffice.org-kde: er, it doesn't work :()

2005-02-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:27:57 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2005 17:18:25 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 05 09:18:25 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CxTZh-0001aE-00; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 09:18:25 -0800
Received: from localhost (h00085405aa1d.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.30.141.95])
  by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP
  id 2005020517175401200g6r7he; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:17:54 +
Received: from zack by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CxTZB-0008Ce-00; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 12:17:53 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Zack Cerza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: openoffice.org-kde: er, it doesn't work :(
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 12:17:53 -0500
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Zack Cerza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: openoffice.org-kde
Version: 1.1.3-4
Severity: normal

Well, I installed openoffice.org-kde and unchecked the 'Use
OpenOffice.org dialogs' option. Restarting openoffice.org numerous times
(the processes were not still running) didn't give me KDE dialogs.

Sorry Rene! :)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers experimental
  APT policy: (990, 'experimental'), (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages openoffice.org-kde depends on:
ii  kdelibs4 4:3.3.2-1   KDE core libraries
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1  1:4.0-0pre5 GCC support library
ii  libqt3c102-mt3:3.3.3-8   Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.5-8   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libstlport4.64.6.2-2 STLport C++ class library
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li
ii  openoffice.org-bin   1.1.3-4 OpenOffice.org office suite binary
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 293767-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2005 04:28:30 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 20:28:30 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net) [204.127.202.59] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D2ihq-fk-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:28:30 -0800
Received: from localhost (h00085405aa1d.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.30.141.95])
  by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP
  id 2005022004275901400s7apfe; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 04:27:59 +
Received: from zack by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1D2ihK-0004Ok-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:27:58 -0500
From: Zack Cerza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed?
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:27:57 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Zack Cerza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

It works now. *shrug*


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#296087: IMPORTANT: Microsoft EULA is NON-FREE and give MS specific rights!!

2005-02-19 Thread John D. Hendrickson
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.1.1-3
Severity: grave


Hello,

This is a SEVERE thing.  I installed Debian/Sarge's version 1.1.1 of
openoffice.

While doing backups I found:

/home/xxx/.openoffice/1.1.1/THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.html

which contains the full Microsoft EULA: (see clip below)

As the license itself says: it is IMPORTANT.  Please recall what
IMPORTING something to ones conscience mind means.

And I don't mind saying I'm angry that some yoohoo slipped that damned
license on my system.  However: I do have a rights to use it.  I'm
licensed to use a MS product meantioned and I paid for my copy of Solaris
and StarOffice.

No.  My concern is the harm that can come to Debian - which is the
largest and best compilation of truely clean of license linux.


///
IF YOU AREN'T YET MAKING PHONE CALLS:

I don't know if you europeans understand what that license means
in U.S. language: it means they have rights to access all of your
personal work on your computer systems and have your ass in any courtroom 
situation simply because their libraries are on your system - even if
you infact didn't know they were there (because you negleged to look for
the license).

If any codes of Microsoft (including fonts or save formats) that the license
referers to are in any part of any of your work: it is not your work ! until
such time as you remove Microsoft's binaries (without looking at them, of
course).

Infact.  Using Microsoft software you have no right to copyright or
share the entirety of your work UNTIL IT IS PRINTED.  That is, until it
contains no Microsoft binaries of any form.

And of COURSE: if you don't have license to use one of the meantioned
products: they can sue you.

And of COURSE: they can sue you for distributing anything containing the
license indescriminantly.

That is in fact what that license says specifically.  That is how it
would be treated.

The President is from Texas (so gov workers now get Dell laptops).  No
coincidence: beleive me.  Microsoft has their own judges and does an
excellent job of lobbying our Congress.

I feel quite confident that the double talk allowed in a case would be
immense and favorative of Microsoft:  If you don't know what double talk
is and how it effects the reality of purpose you had best not even think of
having a copy of the MS EULA anywhere on your HD.


///
IF YOU AREN'T YET MAKING PHONE CALLS:

Did you read that news article in the Washington Post about Sony raiding
Microsoft's Japan Headquarters?  Do you know why?  Its all in the EULA.

Read it again and again until the finality and the wideness sinks in.

I keep thinking of Lindows.  The Linux for compatibility Windows.
Forgive and forget, he liked to say.  He liked to think the days of war
between microsoft and linux were over.  I've know that company at the
assembler level since DOS.  The war was allways there.  Its still here
and bigger than ever.  Microsoft is cheating more than ever: I've read
(or reviewed) most of their Developer's kit (included all but Xp).

When I saw Microsoft suing Lindows I laughed.  I knew two years before it 
happened.  And if you didn't?  You had best open your eyes:

Microsoft is a city in the state of Washington which has (pays) its own
U.S. judges.  They are sprawling and have a lust for riches.  Their is
no sentiment which will calm their push toward monopoly, because it in
part is the primal instinct to breed if it means ruining other cities - and
this instinct is encouraged there in that evil city.  And if you think
those bugs aren't their so they can poke into your government's offices:
your just loosers, so why send your family jewels to Redmond Washington now
while the contribution is still appreciable?

All you have to do is read phorums that Microsoft users from the Seattle
/ Redmond area have left on the internet to see that they seek to
actively demolish averything but their own.  (saw one such message about
tricking linux users just a couple weeks ago while researching)

Their source has been crooked since the DOS and ASM days.  They've been
sued and have ignored U.S. rulings since the DOS days.  They've turned
on every U.S. company that once considered themselves ms insiders.

And for the U.S.?  MS is poision.  It means more imports and less U.S.
workers.  Don't think we like it.  No one in the U.S. likes the phone
company or big government.  Allthough I think the goverment worker
population now outnumbers the *real* workers in the U.S.

You can't fight the bitch with ideas.  Only with faith, GPL code, and
brotherhood to your own; unix users.  And that is where the Lindows guy went
wrong.  He trusted to faith what is not a matter faith.  And he failed
to (though I would have at his age) look into the Oracle of the past
still in the aged Forums on the internet.  It was called war then.
People took it seriously then.

Incidentally:  I won't let this issue rest I'm afraid.  I won't rest
until there is NO 

Re: Bug#296087: IMPORTANT: Microsoft EULA is NON-FREE and give MS specific rights!!

2005-02-19 Thread Ron Johnson
On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 01:25 -0500, John D. Hendrickson wrote:
 Package: openoffice.org
 Version: 1.1.1-3
 Severity: grave
 
 
 Hello,
 
 This is a SEVERE thing.  I installed Debian/Sarge's version 1.1.1 of
 openoffice.
 
 While doing backups I found:
 
   /home/xxx/.openoffice/1.1.1/THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.html
 
 which contains the full Microsoft EULA: (see clip below)
 
 As the license itself says: it is IMPORTANT.  Please recall what
 IMPORTING something to ones conscience mind means.
 
 And I don't mind saying I'm angry that some yoohoo slipped that damned
 license on my system.  However: I do have a rights to use it.  I'm
 licensed to use a MS product meantioned and I paid for my copy of Solaris
 and StarOffice.
 
 No.  My concern is the harm that can come to Debian - which is the
 largest and best compilation of truely clean of license linux.

So what part of the MS Runtime Libraries or .NET Framework comes
with the Linux version of OOo?

I wouldn't be surprised if this was in here only so that OOo only
needed to maintain 1 THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME, and that this really
only applies to Win OOo.

-- 
-
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail.

Never trust a computer you can't control from the command line.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]