Bug#295831: marked as done (openoffice.org-kde depends on an unavailable package)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:26:27 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295831: openoffice.org-kde depends on an unavailable package has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Feb 2005 12:38:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 18 04:38:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (laptop) [210.18.182.33] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D27On-0005SJ-00; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:38:21 -0800 Received: by laptop (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 53CE8C2E17; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:12:58 +0530 (IST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ritesh Raj Sarraf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: openoffice.org-kde depends on an unavailable package X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:12:58 +0530 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: openoffice.org-kde Version: 1.1.3-4 Severity: minor openoffice.org-kde depends on an unavailable package openoffice.org-bin version = 1.1.2+1.1.3 where as on sarge the candidate is 1.1.2dfsg1-3 which makes openoffice.org-kde uninstallable. Regards, Ritesh -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10mbl-bsplash-2.6.10-4 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages openoffice.org-kde depends on: ii kdelibs4 4:3.3.2-1 KDE core libraries ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-6 GCC support library ii libqt3c102-mt3:3.3.3-8 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libstlport4.64.6.2-2 STLport C++ class library ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii openoffice.org-bin 1.1.2dfsg1-3OpenOffice.org office suite binary ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu --- Received: (at 295831-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2005 08:27:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 00:27:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imap.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2Px5-0003tX-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 00:27:00 -0800 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2005 08:26:27 - Received: from dsl-084-056-102-198.arcor-ip.net (EHLO localhost) (84.56.102.198) by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 19 Feb 2005 09:26:27 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1545045 Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 164101C039; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:26:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:26:27 +0100 From: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#295831: openoffice.org-kde depends on an unavailable package Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=H1spWtNR+x+ondvy Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-PGP-Key: 248AEB73 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 Organization: The Debian Project User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --H1spWtNR+x+ondvy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: openoffice.org-kde depends on an unavailable package openoffice.org-bin version =3D 1.1.2+1.1.3 where as on sarge the candidate is
Bug#295900: Depends on gnomelibs
Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: WTF? did you not reopen the old bug but file a new one? sorry, i get really annoyed when people close a bug without actually fixing it (and in this case introducing it since it wasn't there before, at least for i386). isn't this the debian way? :-( --alex-- -- | I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active | | advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with | | automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion | | and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295900: Depends on gnomelibs
Hi. Alex Romosan wrote: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: WTF? did you not reopen the old bug but file a new one? sorry, i get really annoyed when people close a bug without actually fixing it (and in this case introducing it since it wasn't there gar. Get a clue. We mentioned in the changelog so we thought that revision would fix it. The necessary debian/* changes *are* there. Unfortunately we forgot the ooo-build parts and it shlipped through my testing. Humans make errors, don't they? Still still is no reason why you simply couln't have reopened the old bug but but have to file a new one. before, at least for i386). isn't this the debian way? :-( This bug was there before, it just didn't show up because it somehow shows up only *sometimes* (timestsmp skew and so..). The bugfix done in 1.1.3-5 was incomplete, so the the i386 deb now also depends on gnomevfs where was only there on powerpc and s390 before. As I said, humans make errors... That's why it's called unstable. It'll be fixed in the next upload which will come soon. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
CVS:oo-deb/debian changelog,1.427,1.428
Update of /cvs/debian-openoffice/oo-deb/debian In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv14954 Modified Files: changelog Log Message: mention fixed vfs-uno-uri.diff Index: changelog === RCS file: /cvs/debian-openoffice/oo-deb/debian/changelog,v retrieving revision 1.427 retrieving revision 1.428 diff -u -d -r1.427 -r1.428 --- changelog 18 Feb 2005 10:24:11 - 1.427 +++ changelog 19 Feb 2005 18:10:25 - 1.428 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +openoffice.org (1.1.3-6) unstable; urgency=high + + * Brown paper bag release. + * Modified patches: +- vfs-uno-uri.diff: actually add USE_GNOMEVFS confitional + (closes: #293351) [RE] + + -- Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:01:15 +0100 + openoffice.org (1.1.3-5) unstable; urgency=high * New patches: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of openoffice.org_1.1.3-6_source+i386+all.changes
openoffice.org_1.1.3-6_source+i386+all.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openoffice.org-l10n-ru_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-ja_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-thesaurus-en-us_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-cy_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-sk_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-nb_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-tr_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-gl_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-eu_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org_1.1.3-6.diff.gz openoffice.org-l10n-hu_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-lt_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-bin_1.1.3-6_i386.deb openoffice.org_1.1.3-6.dsc openoffice.org-l10n-sl_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-he_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-da_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-nl_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-it_1.1.3-6_all.deb ttf-opensymbol_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-ko_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-cs_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-fi_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-pt-br_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-pt_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-ca_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_1.1.3-6_i386.deb openoffice.org-l10n-zu_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-ns_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-ar_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-et_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-af_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-de_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-sv_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-zh-cn_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-pl_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-zh-tw_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-en_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-hi_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-fr_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-es_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.3-6_i386.deb openoffice.org-l10n-th_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-gnomevfs_1.1.3-6_i386.deb openoffice.org-mimelnk_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-kn_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-kde_1.1.3-6_i386.deb openoffice.org-l10n-tn_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-nn_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-dev_1.1.3-6_i386.deb openoffice.org-l10n-el_1.1.3-6_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293551: marked as done (openoffice.org-bin: Depends on gnomelibs.)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:04:57 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#293551: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.3-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2005 10:12:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 04 02:12:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from godzilla.funcform.se (fortet.funcform.se) [62.65.122.146] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cx0RY-000155-00; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 02:12:04 -0800 Received: from hoshi.netintact.se ([217.73.97.28] helo=chernushka) by fortet.funcform.se with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cx0RW-0002tg-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:12:02 +0100 Received: from andersg by chernushka with local (Exim 4.44) id 1Cx0RR-xW-FL for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:11:57 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Anders Gustafsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: openoffice.org-bin: Depends on gnomelibs. X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:11:57 +0100 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: openoffice.org-bin Severity: normal openoffice.org-bin depends on libbonobo2-0 (= 2.8.0) openoffice.org-bin depends on libgnomevfs2-0 (= 2.8.3-7) I don't want to bloat my system with gnome-libs. What happend to the openoffice.org-gnomevfs package? -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers experimental APT policy: (1001, 'experimental'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages openoffice.org-bin depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0]1.4.42 Debian configuration management sy ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libaudio21.7-2 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s pn libbonobo2-0 Not found. ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcurl3 7.12.3-2Multi-protocol file transfer libra ii libdb4.2++ 4.2.52-18 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries f ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0-0pre4 GCC support library ii libgconf2-4 2.8.1-4 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.1-3 The GLib library of C routines pn libgnomevfs2-0 Not found. ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libmyspell3 1:3.1-10MySpell spellchecking library ii libneon230.23.9.dfsg.3-3 An HTTP and WebDAV client library ii liborbit21:2.10.2-1.1libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management ii libstartup-notification0 0.8-1 library for program launch feedbac ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libstlport4.64.6.2-2 STLport C++ class library ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii libxaw7 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Athena widget set library ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Toolkit Intrinsics pn openoffice.org Not found. ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime --- Received: (at 293551-close) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2005 00:08:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 16:08:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2edt-0001DY-00;
openoffice.org_1.1.3-6_source+i386+all.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: openoffice.org-bin_1.1.3-6_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-bin_1.1.3-6_i386.deb openoffice.org-dev_1.1.3-6_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dev_1.1.3-6_i386.deb openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.3-6_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.3-6_i386.deb openoffice.org-gnomevfs_1.1.3-6_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gnomevfs_1.1.3-6_i386.deb openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_1.1.3-6_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_1.1.3-6_i386.deb openoffice.org-kde_1.1.3-6_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-kde_1.1.3-6_i386.deb openoffice.org-l10n-af_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-af_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-ar_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-ar_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-ca_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-ca_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-cs_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-cs_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-cy_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-cy_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-da_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-da_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-de_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-de_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-el_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-el_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-en_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-en_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-es_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-es_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-et_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-et_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-eu_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-eu_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-fi_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-fi_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-fr_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-fr_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-gl_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-gl_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-he_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-he_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-hi_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-hi_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-hu_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-hu_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-it_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-it_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-ja_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-ja_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-kn_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-kn_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-ko_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-ko_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-lt_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-lt_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-nb_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-nb_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-nl_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-nl_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-nn_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-nn_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-ns_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-ns_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-pl_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-pl_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-pt-br_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-pt-br_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-pt_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-pt_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-ru_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-ru_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-sk_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-sk_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-sl_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-sl_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-sv_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-sv_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-th_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-th_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-tn_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-tn_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-tr_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-tr_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-zh-cn_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-zh-cn_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-zh-tw_1.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-zh-tw_1.1.3-6_all.deb
Bug#295900: marked as done (Depends on gnomelibs)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:04:57 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#293551: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.3-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Feb 2005 21:17:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 18 13:17:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from caliban.lbl.gov [128.3.11.38] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2FVV-0004bm-00; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:17:49 -0800 Received: from caliban.lbl.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by caliban.lbl.gov (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j1ILHnmS022638 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:17:49 -0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by caliban.lbl.gov (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j1ILHmk8022634; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:17:48 -0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Alex Romosan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Depends on gnomelibs X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:17:48 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: openoffice.org-bin Version: 1.1.3-5 Severity: important bug #293551 complained about the same thing and it got closed with the following explanation: build gnomevfs library sanely. obviously this is not corect as the package suddenly (at least on i386) depends on gnome libraries. please fix. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-rc4 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages openoffice.org-bin depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0]1.4.45 Debian configuration management sy ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libaudio21.7-2 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcurl3 7.13.0-1Multi-protocol file transfer libra ii libdb4.2++ 4.2.52-18 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries f ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-9 GCC support library ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libmyspell3 1:3.1-10MySpell spellchecking library ii libneon230.23.9.dfsg.3-2 An HTTP and WebDAV client library ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management ii libstartup-notification0 0.8-1 library for program launch feedbac ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libstlport4.64.6.2-2 STLport C++ class library ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii libxaw7 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Athena widget set library ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii openoffice.org 1.1.3-5 high-quality office productivity s ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-11 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- debconf information: * openoffice.org-bin/prelink: false --- Received: (at 293551-close) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2005 00:08:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 16:08:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2edt-0001DY-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:08:09 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2ean-0004zS-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:04:57 -0500 From: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#293551: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.3-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL
Bug#295916: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#295916: openoffice.org-bin: installs unstripped (huge) binaries)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes: ca. 40 M - 60M. How's that 60M bigger? For the record, I was referring to Installed-Size, not Size, and probably should have been clearer about that. At any rate, it was about a 50% increase either way. It's now at the old size again (-6) - fixed - close. OK, thanks for fixing it promptly. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293767: marked as done (openoffice.org-kde: er, it doesn't work :()
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:27:57 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2005 17:18:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 05 09:18:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CxTZh-0001aE-00; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 09:18:25 -0800 Received: from localhost (h00085405aa1d.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.30.141.95]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id 2005020517175401200g6r7he; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:17:54 + Received: from zack by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CxTZB-0008Ce-00; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 12:17:53 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Zack Cerza [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: openoffice.org-kde: er, it doesn't work :( X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1 Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 12:17:53 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Zack Cerza [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: openoffice.org-kde Version: 1.1.3-4 Severity: normal Well, I installed openoffice.org-kde and unchecked the 'Use OpenOffice.org dialogs' option. Restarting openoffice.org numerous times (the processes were not still running) didn't give me KDE dialogs. Sorry Rene! :) -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers experimental APT policy: (990, 'experimental'), (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages openoffice.org-kde depends on: ii kdelibs4 4:3.3.2-1 KDE core libraries ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0-0pre5 GCC support library ii libqt3c102-mt3:3.3.3-8 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libstlport4.64.6.2-2 STLport C++ class library ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii openoffice.org-bin 1.1.3-4 OpenOffice.org office suite binary ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 293767-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2005 04:28:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 20:28:30 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net) [204.127.202.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2ihq-fk-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:28:30 -0800 Received: from localhost (h00085405aa1d.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.30.141.95]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id 2005022004275901400s7apfe; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 04:27:59 + Received: from zack by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D2ihK-0004Ok-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:27:58 -0500 From: Zack Cerza [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed? Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:27:57 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Zack Cerza [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: It works now. *shrug* -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296087: IMPORTANT: Microsoft EULA is NON-FREE and give MS specific rights!!
Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.1.1-3 Severity: grave Hello, This is a SEVERE thing. I installed Debian/Sarge's version 1.1.1 of openoffice. While doing backups I found: /home/xxx/.openoffice/1.1.1/THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.html which contains the full Microsoft EULA: (see clip below) As the license itself says: it is IMPORTANT. Please recall what IMPORTING something to ones conscience mind means. And I don't mind saying I'm angry that some yoohoo slipped that damned license on my system. However: I do have a rights to use it. I'm licensed to use a MS product meantioned and I paid for my copy of Solaris and StarOffice. No. My concern is the harm that can come to Debian - which is the largest and best compilation of truely clean of license linux. /// IF YOU AREN'T YET MAKING PHONE CALLS: I don't know if you europeans understand what that license means in U.S. language: it means they have rights to access all of your personal work on your computer systems and have your ass in any courtroom situation simply because their libraries are on your system - even if you infact didn't know they were there (because you negleged to look for the license). If any codes of Microsoft (including fonts or save formats) that the license referers to are in any part of any of your work: it is not your work ! until such time as you remove Microsoft's binaries (without looking at them, of course). Infact. Using Microsoft software you have no right to copyright or share the entirety of your work UNTIL IT IS PRINTED. That is, until it contains no Microsoft binaries of any form. And of COURSE: if you don't have license to use one of the meantioned products: they can sue you. And of COURSE: they can sue you for distributing anything containing the license indescriminantly. That is in fact what that license says specifically. That is how it would be treated. The President is from Texas (so gov workers now get Dell laptops). No coincidence: beleive me. Microsoft has their own judges and does an excellent job of lobbying our Congress. I feel quite confident that the double talk allowed in a case would be immense and favorative of Microsoft: If you don't know what double talk is and how it effects the reality of purpose you had best not even think of having a copy of the MS EULA anywhere on your HD. /// IF YOU AREN'T YET MAKING PHONE CALLS: Did you read that news article in the Washington Post about Sony raiding Microsoft's Japan Headquarters? Do you know why? Its all in the EULA. Read it again and again until the finality and the wideness sinks in. I keep thinking of Lindows. The Linux for compatibility Windows. Forgive and forget, he liked to say. He liked to think the days of war between microsoft and linux were over. I've know that company at the assembler level since DOS. The war was allways there. Its still here and bigger than ever. Microsoft is cheating more than ever: I've read (or reviewed) most of their Developer's kit (included all but Xp). When I saw Microsoft suing Lindows I laughed. I knew two years before it happened. And if you didn't? You had best open your eyes: Microsoft is a city in the state of Washington which has (pays) its own U.S. judges. They are sprawling and have a lust for riches. Their is no sentiment which will calm their push toward monopoly, because it in part is the primal instinct to breed if it means ruining other cities - and this instinct is encouraged there in that evil city. And if you think those bugs aren't their so they can poke into your government's offices: your just loosers, so why send your family jewels to Redmond Washington now while the contribution is still appreciable? All you have to do is read phorums that Microsoft users from the Seattle / Redmond area have left on the internet to see that they seek to actively demolish averything but their own. (saw one such message about tricking linux users just a couple weeks ago while researching) Their source has been crooked since the DOS and ASM days. They've been sued and have ignored U.S. rulings since the DOS days. They've turned on every U.S. company that once considered themselves ms insiders. And for the U.S.? MS is poision. It means more imports and less U.S. workers. Don't think we like it. No one in the U.S. likes the phone company or big government. Allthough I think the goverment worker population now outnumbers the *real* workers in the U.S. You can't fight the bitch with ideas. Only with faith, GPL code, and brotherhood to your own; unix users. And that is where the Lindows guy went wrong. He trusted to faith what is not a matter faith. And he failed to (though I would have at his age) look into the Oracle of the past still in the aged Forums on the internet. It was called war then. People took it seriously then. Incidentally: I won't let this issue rest I'm afraid. I won't rest until there is NO
Re: Bug#296087: IMPORTANT: Microsoft EULA is NON-FREE and give MS specific rights!!
On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 01:25 -0500, John D. Hendrickson wrote: Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.1.1-3 Severity: grave Hello, This is a SEVERE thing. I installed Debian/Sarge's version 1.1.1 of openoffice. While doing backups I found: /home/xxx/.openoffice/1.1.1/THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.html which contains the full Microsoft EULA: (see clip below) As the license itself says: it is IMPORTANT. Please recall what IMPORTING something to ones conscience mind means. And I don't mind saying I'm angry that some yoohoo slipped that damned license on my system. However: I do have a rights to use it. I'm licensed to use a MS product meantioned and I paid for my copy of Solaris and StarOffice. No. My concern is the harm that can come to Debian - which is the largest and best compilation of truely clean of license linux. So what part of the MS Runtime Libraries or .NET Framework comes with the Linux version of OOo? I wouldn't be surprised if this was in here only so that OOo only needed to maintain 1 THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME, and that this really only applies to Win OOo. -- - Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. Never trust a computer you can't control from the command line. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
