Bug#292525: openoffice.org: Signal 11 on startup searching fonts
On Thursday 23 June 2005 13:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > THis is a followup for : > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292525 > > > You proposed a fix for the Wordperfect broken font (this bug show > only when enabling in fontconfig) . This one was for the openoffice.org > fontmanager. > > The bug was already reported in : > openoffice.org: crashes when trying to read a non-ascii character > from afm file - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=302160 > which i reassigned to libfreetype6 which your are now the > maintainer . These are different bugs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#292525: openoffice.org: Signal 11 on startup searching fonts
THis is a followup for : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292525 You proposed a fix for the Wordperfect broken font (this bug show only when enabling in fontconfig) . This one was for the openoffice.org fontmanager. The bug was already reported in : openoffice.org: crashes when trying to read a non-ascii character from afm file - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=302160 which i reassigned to libfreetype6 which your are now the maintainer . Could the issue be fixed in libfreetype6 for all applications or is this a openoffice.org only problem ? Sorry if i mistakenly reassigned the previous report. Regards Alban -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#310313: marked as done (openoffice.org-l10n-fr: strange conflict syntax - works by luck for 4.1 do not for 4.2)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:26:31 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line depends mess fixed , thank you has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 May 2005 01:26:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 22 18:26:58 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Da1ic-0005sI-00; Sun, 22 May 2005 18:26:58 -0700 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1106.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id BF2EF1C0008F for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 23 May 2005 03:26:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from argos.server.maison (AToulouse-152-1-34-97.w82-125.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.125.144.97]) by mwinf1106.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 93F5D1C0008B; Mon, 23 May 2005 03:26:26 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from prahal by argos.server.maison with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Da1jO-00033y-Nc; Mon, 23 May 2005 03:27:46 +0200 Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 03:27:46 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: openoffice.org-l10n-fr: strange conflict syntax - works by luck for 4.1 do not for 4.2 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.12 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: openoffice.org-l10n-fr Version: 1.1.4-1 Severity: normal Tags: experimental I don't understand what the conflict are supposed to do: 4.1: --\ Conflicts --- openoffice.org1.1-l10n-fr --\ openoffice.org (< 1.1.3+1.1.4) p 1.1.3-9 --\ openoffice.org (> 1.1.4+1.1.5) 4.2: --\ Conflicts --- openoffice.org1.1-l10n-fr --\ openoffice.org (< 1.1.4+1.1.5) (UNSATISFIED) i 1.1.4-2 p 1.1.3-9 --\ openoffice.org (> 1.1.4+1.1.5) The current l10n package for fr (4.2) is not installable as thre are no version "1.1.4+1.1.5" version of openoffice.org. -en is also broken. Regards Alban -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-rc5 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 310313-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2005 10:27:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 23 03:27:03 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp10.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.21] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DlOvG-00020M-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 03:27:03 -0700 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1008.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8079F280016A for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:26:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from argos.server.maison (AToulouse-152-1-45-202.w82-125.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.125.155.202]) by mwinf1008.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 63D45280015D for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:26:31 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from prahal by argos.server.maison with local (Exim 4.51) id 1DlOul-0003gP-Qj for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:26:31 +0200 Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:26:31 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: depends mess fixed , thank you Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: this bug is fixed, i was the reporter . Greetings Alban -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a su
Bug#311320: marked as done (openoffice.org: Need openoffice version 2 (at least in experimental))
Your message dated Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:50:06 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line again experimental , fixed in experimental : closing bug. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 May 2005 07:28:50 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 31 00:28:50 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mgw-ext01.nokia.com [131.228.20.93] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dd1BB-0002G9-00; Tue, 31 May 2005 00:28:49 -0700 Received: from esebh107.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.143]) by mgw-ext01.nokia.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id j4V7Skxb003846 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 31 May 2005 10:28:48 +0300 Received: from esebh003.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.82]) by esebh107.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 31 May 2005 10:23:08 +0300 Received: from niko ([172.21.93.153]) by esebh003.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6881); Tue, 31 May 2005 10:23:07 +0300 Received: from niko by niko with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Dd15f-0003ZQ-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 31 May 2005 10:23:07 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Andrei Emeltchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: openoffice.org: Need openoffice version 2 (at least in experimental) X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 10:23:07 +0300 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 May 2005 07:23:07.0593 (UTC) FILETIME=[9789BB90:01C565B1] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.1.3-9 Severity: wishlist Hi, I cannot find openoffice version 2 despite it exists in all other distributions. Why in unstable some packages are about 1 year old? -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable'), (9, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R) Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on: ii dictionaries-common [openoffi 0.25.12Common utilities for spelling dict ii openoffice.org-bin1.1.3-9OpenOffice.org office suite binary ii openoffice.org-debian-files 1.1.3-8+1 Debian specific parts of OpenOffic ii openoffice.org-l10n-en [openo 1.1.3-9English (US) language package for ii ttf-opensymbol1.1.3-9The OpenSymbol TrueType font ii xml-core 0.09 XML infrastructure and XML catalog -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 308051-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2005 11:50:36 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 23 04:50:36 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp9.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.22] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DlQE8-0002JG-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 04:50:36 -0700 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0912.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 827CE1C0060A for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:50:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from argos.server.maison (AToulouse-152-1-45-202.w82-125.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.125.155.202]) by mwinf0912.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 668081C00603 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:50:05 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from prahal by argos.server.maison with local (Exim 4.51) id 1DlQDe-0005Cb-74 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:50:06 +0200 Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:50:06 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: again experimental , fixed in experimental : closing bug. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=4
Bug#308051: marked as done ((no subject))
Your message dated Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:50:06 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line again experimental , fixed in experimental : closing bug. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2005 15:33:26 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 07 08:33:26 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from freedom.dicea.unifi.it [150.217.9.3] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DURJ0-00010e-00; Sat, 07 May 2005 08:33:26 -0700 Received: from workinprogress.dicea.unifi.it ([150.217.9.20] helo=localhost.localdomain ident=leo) by freedom.dicea.unifi.it with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DURIw-0003W4-00; Sat, 07 May 2005 17:33:22 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Leonardo Boselli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Optionally: prepare a package oo2 with that version ! X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11 Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 17:34:44 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NOSUBJECT autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Subject: openoffice.org: Obsolete version even on experimental Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.1.3-9 Severity: normal Tags: experimental -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-386 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on: ii dictionaries-common [openoffi 0.25.9 Common utilities for spelling dict ii openoffice.org-bin1.1.3-9OpenOffice.org office suite binary ii openoffice.org-debian-files 1.1.3-8+1 Debian specific parts of OpenOffic ii openoffice.org-l10n-en [openo 1.1.3-9English (US) language package for ii ttf-opensymbol1.1.3-9The OpenSymbol TrueType font ii xml-core 0.09 XML infrastructure and XML catalog -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 308051-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2005 11:50:36 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 23 04:50:36 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp9.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.22] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DlQE8-0002JG-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 04:50:36 -0700 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0912.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 827CE1C0060A for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:50:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from argos.server.maison (AToulouse-152-1-45-202.w82-125.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.125.155.202]) by mwinf0912.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 668081C00603 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:50:05 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from prahal by argos.server.maison with local (Exim 4.51) id 1DlQDe-0005Cb-74 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:50:06 +0200 Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:50:06 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: again experimental , fixed in experimental : closing bug. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: openoffice.org 2 is in experimental. Greetings Alban -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: corrupted fot should be ignored
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 302160 libfreetype6 Bug#302160: openoffice.org: crashes when trying to read a non-ascii character from afm file Bug reassigned from package `openoffice.org' to `libfreetype6'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293015: Bug #293015 - openoffice.org-debian-files: IDL Compiler fails
quit
This is a folowup for:
http://bugs.debian.org/293015
the idl compiler is even more borken now that dpkg 1.13 has
entered sid:
In:
/usr/lib/openoffice${VER}/sdk/`dpkg-architecture
-qDEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM`//bin/"`basename $0`".bin "$@"
Bits from the dpkg maintainer
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00010.html
"However this will break any package that uses the value of
DEB_HOST_GNU_CPU, DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM, DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE or the
DEB_BUILD_* equivalents and expects to find the string "i386" or "linux"
in them."
this now resolve to linux-gnu instead of "linux".
DPKG_HOST_ARCH_OS looks like the proper replacment (though it
looks like a mistake DPKG_ does not exists, i used
DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS).
Though i wonder if it should be used out of the dpkg system (it
would not work for non debian distributions ... and would require
a dependency on dpkg >= 1.13.5). uname ? how does gcc manages
this ...
After fixing this issue i got:
$ LANG=C linux/bin/idlc idl/com/sun/star/uno/XWeak.idl
linux/bin/idlc: line 5:
/usr/lib/openoffice/sdk/linux//bin/idlc.bin: No such file or directory
... i cannot find such a binary on my system (missing dependency
or not compiled ?)
Regards
Alban
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
