Unidentified subject!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 15 02:46:35 2002 X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 20605 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2002 07:46:27 - Received: from unknown (HELO pub.foshan.gd.cn) (218.13.91.31) by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 15 Aug 2002 07:46:27 - From: =?GB2312?B?ueO2q8qht/DJvcrQ0vi71LTvu6/Rp7P9ubi8wdPQz965q8u+?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: =?GB2312?B?zNW0ydG516m7+suuwOTPtc7euK/KtLP9ubg=?= To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org Content-Type: text/plain;charset=GB2312 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:45:47 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: FoxMail 3.11 Release [cn] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=4.7 tests=SUBJ_HAS_Q_MARK version=2.01 ×ܾÀí£º ÄúºÃ£¡ ÒÔÏÂÐÅÏ¢Óйء°ÌÕ´Éѹש»úË®ÀäϵÎÞ¸¯Ê´³ý¹¸¡±£¬Ï£ÍûÄÜΪÄúµÄÆóÒµ½â¾öÌÕ´Éѹש»ú³ý¹¸ÎÊÌâ¡£ ÓÉÓÚÌÕ´Éѹש»ú¹¤×÷ʱ£¬ÒºÑ¹ÓÍϵͳ²úÉú´óÁ¿µÄÈÈ£¬Îª±£Ö¤Ñ¹×©»úҺѹÓÍÓÍα£³ÖÔÚ25¡æ¡«40¡æ¶ÈÖ®¼ä£¬ ÖÆÔ쳧³ö³§Ê±¶¼Éè¼ÆÓÐË®Àäȴϵͳ¶ÔҺѹÓͽøÐнµÎ¡¢ÀäÈ´¡£Èç¹ûË®Àäϵ²»Äܼ°Ê±ÓÐЧµØ½øÐÐÈȽ»»»£¬»áʹÓÍ ÎÂÉý¸ß£¬µ±ÓÍθßÓÚ55¡æʱ£¬¾Í»á×Ô¶¯Í£»ú£¬ÎÞ·¨Õý³£Éú²ú¡£ËùÒÔ£¬±£Ö¤Ñ¹×©»úË®ÀäϵͳµÄÉ¢ÈÈЧ¹û´¦ÓÚ×î¼Ñ ״̬£¬ÊÇÈ·±£Õų̂ѹש»úÕý³£ÔËÐеÄÖØÒªÒ»»·¡£ ´Ó´óÁ¿µÄµ÷²é֤ʵ£¬Ä¿Ç°ÌÕ´ÉÆóÒµÔÚÓõÄѹש»ú»ù±¾É϶¼²ÉÓÃӲˮÀäÈ´£¬Ë®Öи÷ÖÖ¿óÎïÖÊ¡¢ÔÓÖÊÔÚѹש»ú Ë®Àäϵ¹ÜÇ»ÄÚÈÕ»ýÔÂÀÛÓ°ÏìÈȽ»»»£¬ÑÏÖØʱ¾Í»á¶ÂÈûо¹Ü£¬Ó°ÏìÀäÈ´Ë®µÄÑ»·£¬ÊÇÔì³Éѹש»úÓÍÎÂÆ«¸ß£¬Ñ¹Á¦ ²»Õý³££¬»úÌå¹ýÈȵÄÖ÷ÒªÔÒò¡£ ´«Í³µÄ½â¾ö·½·¨ÊDz𿪡¢½âÌå¡¢ÓÃÈ˹¤·½·¨Çå³ý£¬µ«·Ñ¹¤·ÑʱЧ¹û²»ÀíÏë¡£Èç¹ûÓÃÇ¿Ëá³ý¹¸¡¢ÓÉÓÚ¸¯Ê´ÐÔ Ç¿£¬¶ÔÀäȴϵµÄо¹Ü¸¯Ê´É˺¦ÑÏÖØ£¬¼ÓÉÏѹש»ú±¾Éí¼Û¸ñ°º¹ó£¬´ó¶à³§Æó²»Ô¸ÒâÓÃÇ¿Ëá³ý¹¸£¬ÈçÓÃÇ¿Ëá³ý¹¸µÄ ·½·¨£¬Æ丯ʴÐÔ»á´ó´óµÄËõ¶Ìѹש»úË®ÀäȴϵµÄʹÓÃÊÙÃü¡£ Õë¶ÔÖÚ¶àÌÕ´ÉÆóÒµÕâÒ»ÄÑÌ⣬±¾¹«Ë¾Àú¾¶àÄêµÄ¿ÆÑз´¸´ÊÔÑ飬ÑÐÖÆÉú²ú³öFB900ÐÍѹש»úҺѹÓÍÀäȴϵ ͳ¹ÌÌå¸ßЧ³ý¹¸Áé¹¥ÆÆÁËÀúÊ·ÒÔÀ´ÓÃÇ¿Ëá¶ÒˮϡÊ͵ijý¹¸·½·¨¡£ ¸Ã²úÆ·ÊôÖÐÐÔ£¬PHÖµ6.8£¬ÎÞ¶¾¡¢ÎÞ¸¯Ê´¡¢¶ÔÈËÌåÎÞº¦£¬¶Ô»·¾³ÎÞÎÛȾ£¬³ýÐâ¼°Ë®¹¸ÈܽâÂÊ´ï96%£¬¾´óÁ¿ Óû§Ê¹ÓÃ֤ʵ¶ÔÀäȴϵµÄ½ðÊô¡¢Í¡¢Îý¡¢Ï𽺼þ¡¢Ë®·âµÈÎÞÈκθ¯Ê´¡£²¢ÅäÓñ¾¹«Ë¾Éú²úµÄרÓÃÇåÏ´É豸YHD -¢ñÐͳý¹¸»úÓ¦ÓÃÑ»·ÇåÏ´£¬Õë¶Ôѹש»úË®ÀäȴϵͳµÄË®¹¸¡¢ÌúÐâ½øÐÐÇåÏ´×÷Òµ¡£¶ÔÓÚѹש»úÀäȴϵÓÉË®¹¸¡¢ ÌúÐâÒýÆðµÄÓÍÎÂÆ«¸ß¡¢ÓÍѹ²»Õý³£¡¢»úÌå¹ýÈÈÏÖÏóÄܳ¹µ×½â¾öÎÊÌâ¡£ÓøòúÆ·³ý¹¸³ýÐâÇåÏ´ºó¼ì²â¶Ô±È£¬ÓÍΠÓÐÃ÷ÏÔϽµ£¬Äܽ«É¢ÈÈЧ¹û»Ö¸´µ½Õý³£Ë®Æ½¡£Ìî²¹ÁËÎÒ¹úѹש»úË®Àäȴϵͳ³ý¹¸¡¢³ýÐâ²»Ó÷ֲ𣬳ý¹¸¡¢³ý Ðâ¡¢¶ÆĤһ´ÎÍê³ÉµÄ¸ßпƼ¼¹¥¹Ø¿ÎÌâµÄ¿Õ°×£¬ÎªÑ¹×©»úÆóÒµÓû§Ìṩ·½±ã£¬½ÚÊ¡´óÁ¿µÄάÐÞ·ÑÓ㬲¢Êܵ½¹ã ´óÌÕ´ÉÆóÒµµÄ»¶Ó¡£ ¼´Ê¹ÊǹóÆóÒµµÄÌÕ´Éѹש»úδÓÐÒÔÉÏËù½²µÄ²»Õý³£ÏÖÏó·¢Éú£¬Ã¿Ä궼Ӧ¶Ôѹש»úË®Àäȴϵͳ½øÐÐÒ»´Î³ý ¹¸¡¢³ýÐâ×÷Òµ£¬½â³ýË®¹¸¡¢ÐâÊ´¶ÔÉ豸µÄÉ˺¦¡¢ÑÓ³¤É豸ʹÓÃÊÙÃüΪÉϲߡ£ ±¾¹«Ë¾Í¬Ê±ÑÐÖÆÓÐÓ¦ÓÃÓÚ£ºÆû³µ¡¢ÄÚȼ»ú¡¢Ìú·ÄÚȼ»ú¡¢²ñÓÍ·¢µç»ú×é¡¢²ù³µ¡¢²æ³µ¡¢´¬ÓòñÓÍ»úרÓÃµÄ Ë®Àäȴϵͳ³ý¹¸³ýÐâ¼Á¡£ »¶Ó¹óµ¥Î»Ñ¡Ó㬱¾¹«Ë¾ÇåÏ´¹¤³Ì²¿ÓÐרҵÈËÔ±ÉÏÃÅΪ¹ã´óÓû§×öÇåÏ´·þÎñ¡£ ¡¡ ÆóÒµÃû³Æ£º¹ã¶«Ê¡·ðɽÊÐÒø»Ô´ï»¯Ñ§³ý¹¸¼ÁÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ ͨѶµØÖ·£º¹ã¶«Ê¡·ðɽÊлªÔ¶¶«Â·Æ½Ô¹¤ÒµÇø Áª ϵ ÈË£ºÁº¹ú»ù ¹«Ë¾ÍøÕ¾£ºhttp://www.cnyhd.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] µç»°ºÅÂ룺0757-3819087 ´«Õ棺0757-3960856 ---ÒÔÉÏÓʼþÄÚÈÝÓëÖÐ×ÊÔ´ÍøÂç¼°Èí¼þ¿ª·¢ÉÌÎÞ¹Ø--- --- ÖÐ×ÊÔ´ÍøÂç--ÓòÃûÏÈ×¢²áºó¸¶¿î;Ö÷»úÏÈ¿ªÍ¨ºóÊÕ·Ñ¡£ ÉêÇë100MÐéÄâÖ÷»ú350Ôª/Ä꣬Ë͹ú¼ÊÓòÃû+5¸öÐÅÏä http://www.263nic.com/ --- »¶ÓʹÓÃÒÚ»¢EmailϵÁÐÈí¼þ ÏÂÔصØÖ·: http://www.ehoosoft.com ¶¨ÏòÓÊÏäËÑË÷: ÒÚ»¢EmailËÑË÷´óʦ ÓʼþȺ·¢ÌØ¿ì: ÒÚ»¢EmailÓÊ²î ²¡¶¾Óʼþ¿ËÐÇ: ÒÚ»¢Email°²È«´óʦ ..
Received Lines of mailing-list postings
Hello, Would it be possible to leave the original Received: Lines untouched? I filter all china/korean/taiwan/... IP-Blocks based on it... Bye, Olaf
Debian LSB Status
What is (specifically) the current Debian perspective on LSB status? RedHat, SuSE and Mandrake have become Linux Standard Base (LSB) Certified. While Bdale's comment is interesting, it does not speak to Debian's LSB status. http://www.businesswire.com/cgi-bin/f_headline.cgi?bw.081402/60275 The LSB is an important step in the evolution of Linux, one which I hope will help ensure that Linux distributions become ever more compatible in all the ways that really matter to users and developers, said Bdale Garbee, Debian Project Leader. As part of fulfilling our vision of Debian as a Universal Operating System, we intend to continue working both to ensure that Debian is fully capable of running standards-compliant applications, ant that Debian remains an excellent platform for developing them! Thanks, -- -- Grant Bowman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian LSB Status
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 07:37:10AM -0700, Grant Bowman wrote: What is (specifically) the current Debian perspective on LSB status? http://people.debian.org/~taggart/debconf2/ -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]