Re: help needed with LibreOffice Java bridge on s390x/ppc64el
Hi, Am 23.10.23 um 21:59 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 29.10.23 um 11:13 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > (The workaround would be --without-java which I verified to work on > zelenka (see aboe), but this opens a can of worms. Not only disabling > some (built-in) features like the Report Builder but especially since > there is Java-based extensions (_all!) which then get into trouble > dependency-wise/LO will be blocked from migrating to testing maybe...) Since I didn't get any real answer I needed to do that now. It's live now in sid. It now also makes natbrailles autopkgtest fail[1] since that one of course wants ure-java which is Out-of-sync and probably should be decrufted somewhen: $ rmadison -s unstable ure-java ure-java | 4:7.5.9~rc1-1 | unstable | armhf, ppc64el, s390x ure-java | 4:7.6.4~rc1-1 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel, i386 Regards, Rene
Re: help needed with LibreOffice Java bridge on s390x/ppc64el
Hi,
Am 24.10.23 um 15:45 schrieb René Engelhard:
Am 24. Oktober 2023 08:58:22 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian
Glaubitz:
Hello!
On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 23:20 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
we're explicitly building with OpenJDK 8 while Debian builds
with OpenJDK 17 [2] which might explain the different test results.
Which is no option here...
It may not be an option, but it might give you a pointer how to fix the
actual bug, even with OpenJDK 17.
No, given the discussion on the upstream list that's definitely beyond my
skills and needs to be done by a porter.
besides that (on platti):
% make check
S=/home/rene/libreoffice-7.6.2 && I=$S/instdir && W=$S/workdir &&
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:}"$I/program:$I/program"
$I/program/uno.bin -s com.sun.star.test.bridge.BridgeTest --
com.sun.star.test.bridge.CppTestObject
-env:LO_BUILD_LIB_DIR=file://$W/LinkTarget/Library
-env:URE_MORE_SERVICES=file://$W/Rdb/uno_services.rdb
-env:URE_MORE_TYPES=file://$W/UnoApiTarget/bridgetest.rdb &&
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:}"$I/program:$I/program"
$I/program/uno.bin -s com.sun.star.test.bridge.BridgeTest --
com.sun.star.test.bridge.JavaTestObject noCurrentContext
-env:LO_BUILD_LIB_DIR=file://$W/LinkTarget/Library
-env:URE_MORE_SERVICES=file://$W/Rdb/uno_services.rdb
-env:URE_MORE_TYPES=file://$W/UnoApiTarget/bridgetest.rdb
exception occurred: Could not create Java implementation loader at
./stoc/source/javaloader/javaloader.cxx:551
> error: Could not create Java implementation loader at
./stoc/source/javaloader/javaloader.cxx:551
> dying...make: ***
[/home/rene/libreoffice-7.6.2/testtools/CustomTarget_uno_test.mk:32:
/home/rene/libreoffice-7.6.2/workdir/CustomTarget/testtools/uno_test.done]
Error 1
Tried setting the JDK explicitely (all on platti):
8: see above
11: fails in the original way
17: not tested expllicitely, it is the default
21: fails in the original way
Regards
René
Re: help needed with LibreOffice Java bridge on s390x/ppc64el
Hi, Am 24. Oktober 2023 08:58:22 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : >Hello! > >On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 23:20 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> > > we're explicitly building with OpenJDK 8 while Debian builds >> > > with OpenJDK 17 [2] which might explain the different test results. >> >> Which is no option here... > >It may not be an option, but it might give you a pointer how to fix the >actual bug, even with OpenJDK 17. No, given the discussion on the upstream list that's definitely beyond my skills and needs to be done by a porter. Regards René
Re: help needed with LibreOffice Java bridge on s390x/ppc64el
Hello! On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 23:20 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > we're explicitly building with OpenJDK 8 while Debian builds > > > with OpenJDK 17 [2] which might explain the different test results. > > Which is no option here... It may not be an option, but it might give you a pointer how to fix the actual bug, even with OpenJDK 17. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Re: help needed with LibreOffice Java bridge on s390x/ppc64el
Hi, Am 23.10.23 um 23:06 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 21:59 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: since LibreOffice 7.6 (which added some more tests which were manual before to the automatic set) the testtools' bridge test fails: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice=ppc64el=4%3A7.6.2-3=1697981409=0 [...] These tests seem to be passing for 7.6.2 on openSUSE on ppc64el [1]. Interesting. However, on openSUSE, we're explicitly building with OpenJDK 8 while Debian builds with OpenJDK 17 [2] which might explain the different test results. Which is no option here... Regards, Rene
Re: help needed with LibreOffice Java bridge on s390x/ppc64el
Hello! On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 21:59 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > since LibreOffice 7.6 (which added some more tests which were manual > before to the automatic set) the testtools' bridge test fails: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice=ppc64el=4%3A7.6.2-3=1697981409=0 > > See the discussion upstream in > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2023-September/thread.html: > "new bridgetest failures in 7.6 on ppc64le " > > and continued in October > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2023-October/thread.html > > especially > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2023-October/091058.html > and > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2023-October/091059.html > > after which unfortunately noting important happened. (And I don't see a > patch either at Fedora git nor submitted upstream to fix this.) These tests seem to be passing for 7.6.2 on openSUSE on ppc64el [1]. However, on openSUSE, we're explicitly building with OpenJDK 8 while Debian builds with OpenJDK 17 [2] which might explain the different test results. Adrian > [1] > https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory:PowerPC/libreoffice/standard/ppc64le > [2] > https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/openSUSE:Factory/libreoffice/0001-Revert-java-9-changes.patch?expand=1 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Re: help needed with LibreOffice Java bridge on s390x/ppc64el
Hi, forgot to edit $SUBJECT. This is just ppc64el for now. (While s390x also has broken bridges --without-java doesn't seem to help here unfortunately :/) Regards, Rene Am 23.10.23 um 21:59 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Hi, since LibreOffice 7.6 (which added some more tests which were manual before to the automatic set) the testtools' bridge test fails: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice=ppc64el=4%3A7.6.2-3=1697981409=0 See the discussion upstream in https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2023-September/thread.html: "new bridgetest failures in 7.6 on ppc64le " and continued in October https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2023-October/thread.html especially https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2023-October/091058.html and https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2023-October/091059.html after which unfortunately noting important happened. (And I don't see a patch either at Fedora git nor submitted upstream to fix this.) This is probably architecture-specific since the other architectures *do* work. Can you have a look at it, too? (The workaround would be --without-java which I verified to work, but this opens a can of worms. Not only disabling some (built-in) features like the Report Builder but especially since there is Java-based extensions (_all!) which then get into trouble dependency-wise/LO will be blocked from migrating to testing maybe...) Regards, Rene
