Processed: bookworm-pu: package crowdsec-firewall-bouncer/0.0.25-4~deb12u1
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:crowdsec-firewall-bouncer Bug #1072984 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package crowdsec-firewall-bouncer/0.0.25-4~deb12u1 Added indication that 1072984 affects src:crowdsec-firewall-bouncer -- 1072984: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072984 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: bookworm-pu: package golang-github-google-nftables/0.1.0-4~deb12u1
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:golang-github-google-nftables Bug #1072983 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package golang-github-google-nftables/0.1.0-4~deb12u1 Added indication that 1072983 affects src:golang-github-google-nftables -- 1072983: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072983 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: transition: nghttp3
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:nghttp3 Bug #1072925 [release.debian.org] transition: nghttp3 Added indication that 1072925 affects src:nghttp3 -- 1072925: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072925 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: intel-microcode 3.20240514.1~deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1072239 = bookworm pending Bug #1072239 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package intel-microcode/3.20240514.1~deb12u1 Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1072239: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072239 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: intel-microcode 3.20240514.1~deb11u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1072238 = bullseye pending Bug #1072238 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package intel-microcode/3.20240514.1~deb11u1 Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1072238: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072238 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: dns-root-data 2024041801~deb11u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1072653 = bullseye pending Bug #1072653 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801~deb11u1 Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1072653: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072653 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1072859: marked as done (nmu: rust-bindgen-cli_0.66.1-6)
Your message dated Sun, 9 Jun 2024 19:00:23 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1072859: nmu: rust-bindgen-cli_0.66.1-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1072859, regarding nmu: rust-bindgen-cli_0.66.1-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1072859: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072859 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu X-Debbugs-Cc: rust-bindgen-...@packages.debian.org, noisyc...@tutanota.com Control: affects -1 + src:rust-bindgen-cli Hello, In order to fully fix bug #1069047, 'rust-bindgen-cli' needs to be rebuilt against the version of 'librust-bindgen-dev' (0.66.1-6) that landed in unstable just this morning. The previous build did not pick up the needed changes. Thank you. nmu rust-bindgen-cli_0.66.1-6 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against patched librust-bindgen-dev (>= 0.66.1-6)" --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2024-06-09 12:49:40 +0200, NoisyCoil wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > X-Debbugs-Cc: rust-bindgen-...@packages.debian.org, noisyc...@tutanota.com > Control: affects -1 + src:rust-bindgen-cli > > Hello, > > In order to fully fix bug #1069047, 'rust-bindgen-cli' needs to be rebuilt > against the version of 'librust-bindgen-dev' (0.66.1-6) that landed in > unstable just this morning. The previous build did not pick up the needed > changes. > > Thank you. > > > nmu rust-bindgen-cli_0.66.1-6 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against patched > librust-bindgen-dev (>= 0.66.1-6)" Scheduled Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---
Processed: nmu: rust-bindgen-cli_0.66.1-6
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:rust-bindgen-cli Bug #1072859 [release.debian.org] nmu: rust-bindgen-cli_0.66.1-6 Added indication that 1072859 affects src:rust-bindgen-cli -- 1072859: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072859 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: bookworm-pu: package djangorestframework/3.14.0-2
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:djangorestframework Bug #1072856 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package djangorestframework/3.14.0-2 Added indication that 1072856 affects src:djangorestframework -- 1072856: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072856 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: affects 1072853
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1072853 + src:gnustep-base src:gnustep-gui Bug #1072853 [release.debian.org] transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui Added indication that 1072853 affects src:gnustep-base and src:gnustep-gui > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1072853: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072853 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1072488: marked as done (transition: rocksdb)
Your message dated Sat, 8 Jun 2024 18:58:00 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1072488: transition: rocksdb has caused the Debian Bug report #1072488, regarding transition: rocksdb to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1072488: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072488 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: affects -1 + src:rocksdb Hi RMs, I don't know how long the transition queue is, but this is the small rocksdb (8.9 to 9.2 soname) transition request. Only two packages are affected: balboa and sortmerna. Both build fine with the new rocksdb release already in experimental. Thanks for consideration, Laszlo/GCS --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2024-06-02 21:33:28 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 2024-06-02 19:55:47 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > Control: affects -1 + src:rocksdb > > > > Hi RMs, > > > > I don't know how long the transition queue is, but this is the small > > rocksdb (8.9 to 9.2 soname) transition request. > > Only two packages are affected: balboa and sortmerna. Both build fine > > with the new rocksdb release already in experimental. > > Please go ahead The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---
Bug#1072343: marked as done (transition: c-blosc2)
Your message dated Sat, 8 Jun 2024 18:58:40 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1072343: transition: c-blosc2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1072343, regarding transition: c-blosc2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1072343: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072343 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: c-blo...@packages.debian.org, antonio.valent...@tiscali.it Control: affects -1 + src:c-blosc2 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi dear release team, the upgrade from c-blosc2 v2.13.1 to v2.14.4 requires a change in the SONAME and hence a transition. The new version is already in experimental. The following source packages need to be rebuilt: pytables Ben file: title = "c-blosc2"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libblosc2-2t64" | .depends ~ "libblosc2-3"; is_good = .depends ~ "libblosc2-3"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libblosc2-2t64"; Please schedule binNMUs for the above mentioned packages on all architectures. Kind regards -- Antonio Valentino --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2024-06-02 13:19:17 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 2024-06-01 13:34:42 +0200, Antonio Valentino wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > X-Debbugs-Cc: c-blo...@packages.debian.org, antonio.valent...@tiscali.it > > Control: affects -1 + src:c-blosc2 > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > Hi dear release team, > > > > the upgrade from c-blosc2 v2.13.1 to v2.14.4 requires a change in the > > SONAME and hence a transition. The new version is already in experimental. > > The following source packages need to be rebuilt: > > Please go ahead with the upload to unstable. The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---
Bug#1072777: marked as done (nmu: qgis_3.34.7+dfsg-1)
Your message dated Sat, 8 Jun 2024 18:48:40 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1072777: nmu: qgis_3.34.7+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1072777, regarding nmu: qgis_3.34.7+dfsg-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1072777: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072777 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: q...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:qgis User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please rebuild qgis with the new spatialindex in unstable: nmu qgis_3.34.7+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libspatialindex (>= 2.0.0-1)" --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2024-06-07 21:04:48 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: q...@packages.debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:qgis > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > Please rebuild qgis with the new spatialindex in unstable: > > nmu qgis_3.34.7+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libspatialindex > (>= 2.0.0-1)" Scheduled (could have saved yourself a bug report by merging it with the one for minetest) Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---
Bug#1072776: marked as done (nmu: minetest_5.8.0+dfsg+~1.9.0mt13-1)
Your message dated Sat, 8 Jun 2024 18:48:11 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1072776: nmu: minetest_5.8.0+dfsg+~1.9.0mt13-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1072776, regarding nmu: minetest_5.8.0+dfsg+~1.9.0mt13-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1072776: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072776 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: minet...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:minetest User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please rebuild mintest with the new spatialindex in unstable: nmu minetest_5.8.0+dfsg+~1.9.0mt13-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libspatialindex-dev (>= 2.0.0-1)" --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2024-06-07 21:04:11 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: minet...@packages.debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:minetest > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > Please rebuild mintest with the new spatialindex in unstable: > > nmu minetest_5.8.0+dfsg+~1.9.0mt13-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with > libspatialindex-dev (>= 2.0.0-1)" Scheduled Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---
Processed: Re: Bug#1072817: bookworm-pu: package openrc/0.45.2-2+deb12u1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #1072817 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package openrc/0.45.2-2+deb12u1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1072817: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072817 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1072817: bookworm-pu: package openrc/0.45.2-2+deb12u1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #1072817 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package openrc/0.45.2-2+deb12u1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1072817: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072817 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: bookworm-pu: package openrc/0.45.2-2+deb12u1
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:openrc Bug #1072817 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package openrc/0.45.2-2+deb12u1 Added indication that 1072817 affects src:openrc -- 1072817: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072817 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: nmu: minetest_5.8.0+dfsg+~1.9.0mt13-1
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:minetest Bug #1072776 [release.debian.org] nmu: minetest_5.8.0+dfsg+~1.9.0mt13-1 Added indication that 1072776 affects src:minetest -- 1072776: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072776 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: nmu: qgis_3.34.7+dfsg-1
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:qgis Bug #1072777 [release.debian.org] nmu: qgis_3.34.7+dfsg-1 Added indication that 1072777 affects src:qgis -- 1072777: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072777 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: transition: rtmidi
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:rtmidi Bug #1072755 [release.debian.org] transition: rtmidi Added indication that 1072755 affects src:rtmidi -- 1072755: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072755 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: bullseye-pu: package pyroute2/0.5.14-2
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:pyroute2 Bug #1072746 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package pyroute2/0.5.14-2 Added indication that 1072746 affects src:pyroute2 -- 1072746: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072746 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: transition: rtaudio
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:rtaudio Bug #1072740 [release.debian.org] transition: rtaudio Added indication that 1072740 affects src:rtaudio -- 1072740: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072740 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1070108: bullseye-pu: package org-mode/9.4.0+dfsg-1+deb11u2
Processing control commands: > tag -1 = bullseye pending Bug #1070108 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package org-mode/9.4.0+dfsg-1+deb11u2 Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed. -- 1070108: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070108 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: bookworm-pu: package systemd/252.26-1~deb12u2
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:systemd Bug #1072716 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package systemd/252.26-1~deb12u2 Added indication that 1072716 affects src:systemd -- 1072716: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072716 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1071235: transition: qt6-base 6.6.2
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1071235 [release.debian.org] transition: qt6-base 6.6.2 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1071235: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071235 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1072035: marked as done (bookworm-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801~deb12u1)
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1072035 {Done: Marco d'Itri } [release.debian.org]
bookworm-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801~deb12u1
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions dns-root-data/2024041801~deb12u1.
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #1072035 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
dns-root-data/2024041801~deb12u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1072035: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072035
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1028506: marked as done (transition: libquotient)
Your message dated Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:42:31 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1028506: transition: libquotient has caused the Debian Bug report #1028506, regarding transition: libquotient to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1028506: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028506 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition reason: new upstream release two packages affected: - neochat: nearly builds as-is. Only needed change is to disable running the tests, because the tests require a display. (The tests only run with the new version of libquotient -- the tests did not run with the old version, so did not break the build.) - quaternion: needs a new upstream release, which should be coming soon, but we can remove the current version from testing until it is released. auto-ben from https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libquotient.html seems correct Ben file: title = "libquotient"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libquotient0.6" | .depends ~ "libquotient0.7"; is_good = .depends ~ "libquotient0.7"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libquotient0.6"; --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2023-01-16 11:36:20 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo trixie > > Hi Hubert > > On 2023-01-11 21:35:56 -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > reason: new upstream release > > two packages affected: > > - neochat: nearly builds as-is. Only needed change is to disable > > running the tests, because the tests require a display. (The tests > > only run with the new version of libquotient -- the tests did not run > > with the old version, so did not break the build.) > > - quaternion: needs a new upstream release, which should be coming soon, > > but we can remove the current version from testing until it is released. > > In other words, that transition is not ready. Let's postpone this to > trixie. The old binaries got remove from testing. Closing Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---
Bug#1072035: marked as done (bookworm-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801~deb12u1)
Your message dated Wed, 05 Jun 2024 21:47:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1072035: fixed in dns-root-data 2024041801~deb12u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1072035, regarding bookworm-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801~deb12u1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1072035: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072035 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: dns-root-d...@packages.debian.org, meiers.jo...@gmail.com Control: affects -1 + src:dns-root-data [ Reason ] As already mentioned in Bug #1054393, the IP addresses of the B root DNS server have changed. The aim is to increase redundancy in the event of problems with an RPKI TAL, see original bug. Since this package is more like a database (like the one for the timezones) Debian should include the change in Bookworm and Bullseye. [ Impact ] According to the operator (University of Southern California), the old IPs will continue to operate until at least 2024-11-27. After that, Debian users may experience slowdowns when resolving DNS requests. [ Risks ] Since this package is like a database I consider the risk to be very low. [ Checklist ] [*] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog [ ] I reviewed all changes and I approve them [ ] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable [*] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable [ Changes ] * New IPv4 and IPv6 address for b.root-servers.net * Update expired GRS PGP key of Verisign * Internal adjustments to the package (documentation and uploaders) by Marco d'Itri --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: dns-root-data Source-Version: 2024041801~deb12u1 Done: Marco d'Itri We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of dns-root-data, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1072...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Marco d'Itri (supplier of updated dns-root-data package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 14:02:49 +0200 Source: dns-root-data Architecture: source Version: 2024041801~deb12u1 Distribution: bookworm Urgency: medium Maintainer: dns-root-data packagers Changed-By: Marco d'Itri Closes: 1072035 Changes: dns-root-data (2024041801~deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium . * Rebuild for bookworm. (Closes: #1072035) Checksums-Sha1: 89a4840d1eac64a143b76e4e759ab51ec4f54b7b 1358 dns-root-data_2024041801~deb12u1.dsc 0838a4a75d780866403608cee6181a1e31c8af16 15232 dns-root-data_2024041801~deb12u1.tar.xz 58ed7abb95f144ef6d7e19f40e02dd17d8e13375 5550 dns-root-data_2024041801~deb12u1_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: adf63b0c8ce3a825befd4465fd5fcc0cec11131cde3071b993939c467975f4ee 1358 dns-root-data_2024041801~deb12u1.dsc 5a3cf34d0e591d410da369aca9aa6f65bcc0731fb15b23cb99f8061f4a023df9 15232 dns-root-data_2024041801~deb12u1.tar.xz 12105e10b2206833c3d0500ffed11041a59051dd08863efb1a9751cfa512f9de 5550 dns-root-data_2024041801~deb12u1_amd64.buildinfo Files: 2a41b24a2f319b66a5200e48e92115a6 1358 misc optional dns-root-data_2024041801~deb12u1.dsc ff6dc17014514512438d9599d806bd10 15232 misc optional dns-root-data_2024041801~deb12u1.tar.xz 849f48160f80439fa64f9667a89f18d2 5550 misc optional dns-root-data_2024041801~deb12u1_amd64.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iHUEARYIAB0WIQQnKUXNg20437dCfobLPsM64d7XgQUCZlhs6wAKCRDLPsM64d7X gcsjAQCJNlOEvmMd1wJDwwulTJ3zxolTy6AnU/Da8uNirUJmyAD9GdkPakSOsO9f nqp3E4FNUK0HEMMLGMkm6QRS43XAawE= =bW1s -END PGP SIGNATURE- pgp6BIrdfGhp_.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Processed: galera-4 26.4.18-0+deb11u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1036083 = bullseye pending Bug #1036083 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package galera-4 26.4.18-0+deb11u1 Bug #1069802 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package galera-4 26.4.18-0+deb11u1 Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed. Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1036083: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036083 1069802: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069802 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: galera-4 26.4.18-0+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1069639 = bookworm pending Bug #1069639 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package galera-4 26.4.18-0+deb12u1 Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1069639: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069639 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: dns-root-data 2024041801~deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1072035 = bookworm pending Bug #1072035 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801~deb12u1 Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1072035: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072035 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1070108: bullseye-pu: package org-mode/9.4.0+dfsg-1+deb11u2
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1070108 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package org-mode/9.4.0+dfsg-1+deb11u2 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1070108: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070108 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1072248: bullseye-pu: package runc/1.0.0~rc93+ds1-5+deb11u4
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1072248 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package runc/1.0.0~rc93+ds1-5+deb11u4 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1072248 to the same tags previously set -- 1072248: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072248 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1072239: bookworm-pu: package intel-microcode/3.20240514.1~deb12u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1072239 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package intel-microcode/3.20240514.1~deb12u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1072239: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072239 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1072238: bullseye-pu: package intel-microcode/3.20240514.1~deb11u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1072238 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package intel-microcode/3.20240514.1~deb11u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1072238: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072238 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1072248: bullseye-pu: package runc/1.0.0~rc93+ds1-5+deb11u4
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1072248 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package runc/1.0.0~rc93+ds1-5+deb11u4 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1072248: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072248 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: retitle 1072653 to bullseye-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801~deb11u1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1072653 bullseye-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801~deb11u1 Bug #1072653 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041802~deb11u1 Changed Bug title to 'bullseye-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801~deb11u1' from 'bullseye-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041802~deb11u1'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1072653: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072653 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: retitle 1072035 to bookworm-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801~deb12u1, tagging 1072035 ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1072035 bookworm-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801~deb12u1 Bug #1072035 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801 Changed Bug title to 'bookworm-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801~deb12u1' from 'bookworm-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801'. > tags 1072035 + confirmed Bug #1072035 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801~deb12u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. > clone 1072035 -1 Bug #1072035 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801~deb12u1 Bug 1072035 cloned as bug 1072653 > tags -1 = bullseye confirmed Bug #1072653 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801~deb12u1 Added tag(s) bullseye; removed tag(s) bookworm. > retitle -1 bullseye-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041802~deb11u1 Bug #1072653 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801~deb12u1 Changed Bug title to 'bullseye-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041802~deb11u1' from 'bookworm-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801~deb12u1'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1072035: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072035 1072653: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072653 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: RM: phppgadmin -- RoM; security issues in bullseye
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:phppgadmin Bug #1072589 [release.debian.org] RM: phppgadmin -- RoM; security issues in bullseye Added indication that 1072589 affects src:phppgadmin -- 1072589: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072589 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1071086: marked as done (unblock: rust-bindgen/0.66.1-5)
Your message dated Tue, 4 Jun 2024 21:01:41 +0200 with message-id <6f3d0eb9-4173-4530-9fcd-a818ce78d...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1071086: unblock: rust-bindgen/0.66.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1071086, regarding unblock: rust-bindgen/0.66.1-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1071086: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071086 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package rust-bindgen According to britney rust-bindgen is blocked by a "piuparts regression", but piuparts.debian.org says everything is ok. My understanding is that this can be caused by cruft packages in unstable, though it doesn't always happen for some reason. I've filed a removal request for the cruft packages (they aren't being removed automatically because dak doesn't properly understand virtual packages) but my experiance in the past is that such removal requests can take a long time. The new version of rust-bindgen contains an important time64 fix and is blocking the migration of the new version of rust-pipewire, so I'd appreciate it being allowed in. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, On 14-05-2024 1:50 a.m., plugwash wrote: According to britney rust-bindgen is blocked by a "piuparts regression", but piuparts.debian.org says everything is ok. My understanding is that this can be caused by cruft packages in unstable, though it doesn't always happen for some reason. Thanks, I informed the piuparts maintainer after receiving this bug report and I think the response was he'd fix it soon (which may now already be in the past). Anyways, one day after filing this report, rust-bindgen migrated, so let's close this bug. Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message ---
Bug#1072564: marked as done (nmu: cctbx_2023.12+ds2+~3.17.0+ds1-4 clipper_ 2.1.20201109-2 libpdb-redo_3.0.5-2 ssm_1.4.0-2)
Your message dated Tue, 4 Jun 2024 13:58:34 +0200 with message-id <2f051e1d-458f-40b7-b451-cf65bb33f...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1072564: nmu: cctbx_2023.12+ds2+~3.17.0+ds1-4 clipper_ 2.1.20201109-2 libpdb-redo_3.0.5-2 ssm_1.4.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1072564, regarding nmu: cctbx_2023.12+ds2+~3.17.0+ds1-4 clipper_ 2.1.20201109-2 libpdb-redo_3.0.5-2 ssm_1.4.0-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1072564: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072564 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hello, I want to request binNMU on packages which are affected by libccp4 soname change due to time_t64 transition: nmu cctbx_2023.12+ds2+~3.17.0+ds1-4 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libccp4-dev >= 8.0.0-3" nmu clipper_ 2.1.20201109-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libccp4-dev >= 8.0.0-3" nmu libpdb-redo_3.0.5-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libccp4-dev >= 8.0.0-3" nmu ssm_1.4.0-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libccp4-dev >= 8.0.0-3" Thanks, Andrius --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 04/06/2024 13:46, Andrius Merkys wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hello, I want to request binNMU on packages which are affected by libccp4 soname change due to time_t64 transition: nmu cctbx_2023.12+ds2+~3.17.0+ds1-4 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libccp4-dev >= 8.0.0-3" nmu clipper_ 2.1.20201109-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libccp4-dev >= 8.0.0-3" nmu libpdb-redo_3.0.5-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libccp4-dev >= 8.0.0-3" nmu ssm_1.4.0-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libccp4-dev >= 8.0.0-3" Scheduled. Emilio--- End Message ---
Processed: Re: Bug#1072488: transition: rocksdb
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1072488 [release.debian.org] transition: rocksdb Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1072488: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072488 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: transition: rocksdb
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:rocksdb Bug #1072488 [release.debian.org] transition: rocksdb Added indication that 1072488 affects src:rocksdb -- 1072488: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072488 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: bookworm-pu: package lua5.4/5.4.4-3+deb12u1
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:lua5.4 Bug #1072476 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package lua5.4/5.4.4-3+deb12u1 Added indication that 1072476 affects src:lua5.4 -- 1072476: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072476 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: transition: ffmpeg
462 1072410 1072414 1072399 1072459 1072405 1072435 1072449 1072408 1072432 1072438 1072402 1072466 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1072466: 1072463 > block -1 by 1072464 Bug #1072466 [release.debian.org] transition: ffmpeg 1072466 was blocked by: 1072339 1072425 1072428 1072422 1072452 1072458 1072398 1072455 1072439 1072409 1072442 1072448 1072413 1072416 1072445 1072449 1072402 1072432 1072438 1072408 1072435 1072405 1072459 1072399 1072414 1072462 1072411 1072429 1072410 1072417 1072427 1072419 1072421 1072406 1072420 1072436 1072433 1072403 1072424 1072454 1072451 1072447 1072450 1072444 1072463 1072441 1072457 1072440 1072404 1072434 1072401 1072431 1072426 1072400 1072430 1072423 1072437 1072407 1072418 1072443 1072412 1072461 1072446 1069595 1072415 1072453 1072456 1072466 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1072466: 1072464 > affects -1 + src:ffmpeg Bug #1072466 [release.debian.org] transition: ffmpeg Added indication that 1072466 affects src:ffmpeg -- 1072466: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072466 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1036884: marked as done (transition: time64_t)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Jun 2024 13:35:06 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t has caused the Debian Bug report #1036884, regarding transition: time64_t to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1036884: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036884 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Severity: normal Dear Release Team, I had started a thread on debian-devel[1] about the need to migrate 32-bit architectures to 64-bit time_t in preparation for 2038, an ABI-breaking change. As the discussion on debian-devel has died down, I think it's time to formally put this request on debian-release's radar. I believe the last time we had an archive ABI change was before the Release Team's current policy on transitions was put into place. As mentioned in that thread, there are probably more than 400 libraries whose ABIs/package names are affected (380 identified to date); a list of these is attached. I've provided a mock ben config below; a real one could be synthesized once the analysis is finished, though I'm not sure how useful it would be. Also mentioned in the thread[2], it would be quite cumbersome to start this transition in experimental (since it's toolchain-driven rather than source-driven) but getting all of the binary packages through NEW in experimental (with the wrong ABI) may help with timing. I'm open to guidance here. Due to the broad and disruptive nature of this change, I am writing to request a slot for the transition, preferably the first in the upcoming trixie cycle. I have not build-tested the reverse-build-dependencies. There are at least 5000 source packages in unstable that need rebuilt as part of this transition. Some of them will likely show they have regressed in buildability, including some that are currently in testing; hopefully a very small number since we are about to release. There is discussion of whether we should enable -Werror=implicit-function-declaration as part of the ABI transition. If so, that will increase the number of build failures, though also hopefully only a bit. I do not expect build failures as a direct result of the ABI transition. If you do want build tests before upload to unstable, guidance is welcome. Ben file: title = "time64_t"; is_affected = .depends ~ "old=/^.*$/" | .depends ~ "new=/^.*64t$/"; is_good = .depends ~ "new=/^.*64t$/"; is_bad = .depends ~ "old=/^.*$/"; -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2023/05/msg00168.html [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2023/05/msg00260.html libevince-dev binutils-dev libabsl-dev libaio-dev libapr1-dev libaprutil1-dev libarchive-dev libasound2-dev libatm1-dev libatspi2.0-dev libauparse-dev libbtrfsutil-dev libc-ares-dev libcamel1.2-dev libclamav-dev libcups2-dev libcupsfilters-dev libcupsimage2-dev libcurl4-gnutls-dev libcurl4-nss-dev libcurl4-openssl-dev libdb5.3++-dev libdb5.3-dev libdb5.3-stl-dev libdbi-dev libdv4-dev libelf-dev libevent-dev libfcgi-dev libfido2-dev libgnutls28-dev libgphoto2-dev libgpod-dev libgps-dev libgsound-dev libgxps-dev libieee1284-3-dev libipa-hbac-dev libisofs-dev libiw-dev libknet-dev libmemcached-dev libmtdev-dev libmtp-dev libnatpmp-dev libnpth0-dev libnutclient-dev liboath-dev libp11-dev libpam0g-dev libparted-dev libpath-utils-dev libpcap0.8-dev libpkcs11-helper1-dev libpng-dev libpoppler-glib-dev libpsl-dev librados-dev librasqal3-dev libraw-dev librdf0-dev libreadline-dev librrd-dev librsync-dev libsoup2.4-dev libstatgrab-dev libtevent-dev libtokyocabinet-dev libudf-dev libupsclient-dev libv4l-dev libvformat-dev pacemaker-dev uuid-dev libopenzwave1.6-dev libricohcamerasdk-dev android-libboringssl-dev libext2fs-dev libglibmm-2.4-dev libgnome-bg-4-dev libgnome-desktop-4-dev apache2-ssl-dev libglib2.0-dev android-liblog-dev clearsilver-dev davix-dev drac-dev hexchat-dev itcl3-dev itk3-dev libace-flreactor-dev libace-foxreactor-dev libace-htbp-dev libace-inet-dev libace-inet-ssl-dev libace-rmcast-dev libace-ssl-dev libace-tmcast-dev libace-xtreactor-dev libacexml-dev libadns1-dev libaldmb1-dev liballegro-acodec5-dev liballegro-au
Bug#1028489: marked as done (transition: boost1.83)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Jun 2024 13:25:48 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1028489: boost1.83 as default has caused the Debian Bug report #1028489, regarding transition: boost1.83 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1028489: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028489 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: boost1...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:boost1.81 Dear release team, this is the placeholder for the possible upcoming boost1.81 transition. We are working hard to prepare the transition as smooth as possible. Large test rebuild of all dependent packages is planned. Thanks Ben file: title = "boost1.81"; is_affected = .depends ~ /libboost[a-z-.]*1\.[74]/ is_good = .depends ~ /libboost[a-z-.]*1\.81/ is_bad = .depends ~ /libboost[a-z-.]*1\.74/ --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2024-01-14 11:05:10 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Hi Anton > > On 2023-12-18 07:20:28 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > uploded. > > boost-defaults migrated to testing. The remaining issues are: > > ceph: #1056793, #1056085, #1058543 > graph-tool: #1060786 > i2pd: #1060787 > pycuda: #1060788 This is done. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---
Bug#1050071: marked as done (llvm-defaults: move to 16)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Jun 2024 13:18:09 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1050071: llvm-defaults: move to 16 has caused the Debian Bug report #1050071, regarding llvm-defaults: move to 16 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1050071: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050071 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello, Let's upgrade llvm one more time. I am aware of mipsel and mips64el build failures. I am looking into it. llvm-defaults has been pointing to 16 in experimental for quite sometime. Opening this transition to make sure it is on your radar! :) I opened bug #1050070 & #1050069 for future removals. Thanks Sylvestre title = "llvm-defaults 16"; is_affected = .build-depends ~ /\b(libclang|liblldb|llvm)-dev\b/; is_good = .depends ~ /\b(lib|)(clang|lldb|llvm)1?-?16\b/; is_bad = .depends ~ /\b(lib|)(clang|lldb|llvm)1?-?14\b/; --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2023-08-19 10:39:44 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User:release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hello, > > Let's upgrade llvm one more time. > > I am aware of mipsel and mips64el build failures. I am looking into it. > llvm-defaults has been pointing to 16 in experimental for quite sometime. > Opening this transition to make sure it is on your radar! :) > > I opened bug #1050070 & #1050069 for future removals. Let's consider this done. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---
Processed: Re: Bug#1072343: transition: c-blosc2
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1072343 [release.debian.org] transition: c-blosc2 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1072343: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072343 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1071065: marked as done (transition: libsecp256k1)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Jun 2024 13:14:56 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1071065: transition: libsecp256k1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1071065, regarding transition: libsecp256k1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1071065: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071065 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: affects -1 + src:libsecp256k1 Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libsecp256k1.html Hi, I request a transition slot from libsecp256k1-1 to libsecp256k1-2. The auto-generated tracker is okay. All reverse dependencies in sid build with the experimental libsecp256k1. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2024-05-13 20:24:53 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 2024-05-13 19:59:30 +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > Control: affects -1 + src:libsecp256k1 > > Control: forwarded -1 > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libsecp256k1.html > > > > Hi, > > > > I request a transition slot from libsecp256k1-1 to libsecp256k1-2. > > The auto-generated tracker is okay. All reverse dependencies in sid build > > with the experimental libsecp256k1. > > Please go ahead The old binaroes got removed from testing. Closing Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---
Processed: Re: Bug#1071121: transition: clamav
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1071121 [release.debian.org] transition: clamav Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1071121: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071121 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1070703: marked as done (transition: libunibreak)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Jun 2024 13:11:41 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1070703: transition: libunibreak has caused the Debian Bug report #1070703, regarding transition: libunibreak to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1070703: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070703 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: libunibr...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:libunibreak User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, I'd like to request a transition slot for the update of the libunibreak library 5.1 to 6.1. Each new major version bumps the SOVERSION, and in this case there are only few new symbols. There are few users of libunibreak in Debian: - fbreader - krita - libass I verified that all of them build fine using the new version of libunibreak. Ben file: title = "libunibreak"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libunibreak5" | .depends ~ "libunibreak6"; is_good = .depends ~ "libunibreak6"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libunibreak5"; Thanks, -- Pino --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2024-05-07 16:10:40 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 07/05/2024 15:52, Pino Toscano wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > X-Debbugs-Cc: libunibr...@packages.debian.org > > Control: affects -1 + src:libunibreak > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to request a transition slot for the update of the libunibreak > > library 5.1 to 6.1. Each new major version bumps the SOVERSION, and in > > this case there are only few new symbols. > > > > There are few users of libunibreak in Debian: > > - fbreader > > - krita > > - libass > > I verified that all of them build fine using the new version of > > libunibreak. > > Go ahead. The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---
Bug#1066918: marked as done (nmu: packages that build-depend on the libsimde-dev header-only library)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Jun 2024 13:08:39 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1066918: nmu: packages that build-depend on the
libsimde-dev header-only library
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066918,
regarding nmu: packages that build-depend on the libsimde-dev header-only
library
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1066918: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066918
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: cru...@debian.org
Hello!
There is a new release of the libsimde-dev header only library which
include fixes for many architectures and numerous optimizations. More
information is available at https://wiki.debian.org/SIMDEverywhere
Please rebuild all packages that build-dep on libsimde-dev so they may
gain the benefits of the new release.
Of course, given all of the excitement in the archive with the t64
transition, I am happy for this to wait for a bit :-)
The following command is from the output of:
# apt install wget devscripts dose-extra dctrl-tools
echo "nmu " ; for source in $(build-rdeps --quiet --distribution
unstable libsimde-dev); \
do for version in $(rmadison ${source} --suite unstable
--architecture source | awk '{ print $3}') ; \
do echo -n "${source}_${version} " ; done ; done ; echo " . ANY .
-m 'Rebuild using libsimde-dev 0.8.0-1.'"
nmu abpoa_1.5.1-1 bowtie2_2.5.2-1 bwa_0.7.17-7 emscripten_3.1.6~dfsg-6
examl_3.0.22-4 fasta3_36.3.8i.14-Nov-2020-1
fermi-lite_0.1+git20190320.b499514-1 gatk-bwamem_1.0.4+dfsg2-2
gmap_2024-02-22+ds-1 hhsuite_3.3.0+ds-8 hisat2_2.2.1-4 kalign_1:3.3.5-1
kmc_3.2.4+dfsg-1 last-align_1542-1 libssw_1.1-14 looking-glass_0+b6-1
macs_3.0.1-2 metaeuk_6-a5d39d9+ds-4 minimap2_2.24+dfsg-3
minimap2_2.26+dfsg-1 mmseqs2_15-6f452+ds-2
ngmlr_0.2.7+git20210816.a2a31fb+dfsg-2 obs-3d-effect_0.0.2-2
obs-advanced-scene-switcher_1.23.1-2 obs-ashmanix-blur-filter_1.0.1-2
obs-ashmanix-countdown_1.3.3-1 obs-color-monitor_0.6.1-1
obs-command-source_0.4.0-4 obs-downstream-keyer_0.2.7-2
obs-gradient-source_0.3.2-1 obs-move-transition_2.9.6-1 obs-ptz_0.10.4-1
obs-scene-as-transition_1.1.0+20230419.ce423a3-2
obs-scene-collection-manager_0.0.8-4 obs-scene-notes-dock_0.2.0-2
obs-scene-tree-view_0.1.7-1 obs-source-clone_0.1.4-1
obs-source-copy_0.2.2-7 obs-studio_29.1.3+dfsg-2
obs-studio_30.0.2+dfsg-2 obs-studio_30.0.2+dfsg-2.1
obs-time-source_0.2-3 obs-transition-table_0.2.7-1
obs-vintage-filter_1.0.0-2 obs-websocket_4.9.0-2 onednn_2.7.4-2
onednn_3.1.1-2 openmm_8.0.0+dfsg-6 openmm_8.0.0+dfsg-6.1
parasail_2.6.2+dfsg-1 pbcopper_2.3.0+dfsg-2 plast_2.3.2+dfsg-10
plink2_2.00~a5.8-231123+dfsg-1 python-skbio_0.5.9-4 rapmap_0.15.0+dfsg-3
raxml_8.2.13+dfsg-1 rna-star_2.7.11b+dfsg-1 salmon_1.10.2+ds1-1
scrappie_1.4.2-8 seqan-raptor_3.0.1+ds-5 snap-aligner_2.0.3+dfsg-2
spoa_4.0.8-1 supertuxkart_1.4+dfsg-3 vg_1.30.0+ds-1 wtdbg2_2.5-9
z3_4.8.12-3.1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild using libsimde-dev 0.8.0-1.'
Thanks!
--
Michael R. Crusoe
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2024-03-15 13:14:33 +0100, Michael R. Crusoe wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> X-Debbugs-Cc: cru...@debian.org
>
> Hello!
>
> There is a new release of the libsimde-dev header only library which include
> fixes for many architectures and numerous optimizations. More information is
> available at https://wiki.debian.org/SIMDEverywhere
>
> Please rebuild all packages that build-dep on libsimde-dev so they may gain
> the benefits of the new release.
>
> Of course, given all of the excitement in the archive with the t64
> transition, I am happy for this to wait for a bit :-)
>
> The following command is from the output of:
>
> # apt install wget devscripts dose-extra dctrl-tools
> echo "nmu " ; for source in $(build-rdeps --quiet --distribution unstable
> libsimde-dev); \
> do for version in $(rmadison ${source} --suite unstable --architecture
> source | awk '{ print $3}') ; \
> do echo -n "${source}_${version} " ; done ; done ; echo " . ANY . -m
> 'Rebuild using libsimde-dev 0.8.0-1.'"
>
> nmu abpoa_1.5.1-1 bowtie2_2.5.2-1 bwa_0.7.17-7 emscripten_3.1.6~dfsg-6
> examl_3.0.22-4 fasta3_36
Bug#1071577: marked as done (transition: libcamera 0.3.0)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Jun 2024 13:13:50 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1071577: transition: libcamera 0.3.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #1071577, regarding transition: libcamera 0.3.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1071577: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071577 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: affects -1 + src:libcamera Dear Release Team, Please schedule a transition slot for libcamera 0.3.0. The auto-generated ben tracker looks good: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libcamera.html The unique reverse dep (pipewire 1.0.6-1) builds fine with libcamera 0.3.0 in experimental. Thanks. Best regards, Dylan --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2024-05-22 10:55:38 +0200, Dylan Aïssi wrote: > Hi, > > Le mer. 22 mai 2024 à 08:51, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a > écrit : > > > > > Please schedule a transition slot for libcamera 0.3.0. > > > > > Go ahead. > > > > Thanks, done! The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---
Bug#1070698: marked as done (transition: ticcutils)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Jun 2024 13:12:03 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1070698: transition: ticcutils has caused the Debian Bug report #1070698, regarding transition: ticcutils to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1070698: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070698 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: ticcut...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:ticcutils Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ticcutils.html User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition I am requesting a transition slot for ticcutils. The experimental version builds libticcutils9 while the unstable version has libticcutils8t64. The referenced tracker is okay. All reverse dependencies build with the experimental version (where an experimental version exists, it is the one that builds with libticcutils9). --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2024-05-07 15:42:11 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 07/05/2024 14:21, Bastian Germann wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > X-Debbugs-Cc: ticcut...@packages.debian.org > > Control: affects -1 + src:ticcutils > > Control: forwarded -1 > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ticcutils.html > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > I am requesting a transition slot for ticcutils. The experimental > > version builds libticcutils9 while the unstable version has > > libticcutils8t64. The referenced tracker is okay. All reverse > > dependencies build with the experimental version (where an experimental > > version exists, it is the one that builds with libticcutils9). > > Go ahead. The old binaries got removed from testing. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---
Bug#1062761: marked as done (transition: libfm-qt)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Jun 2024 13:09:01 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1062761: transition: libfm-qt
has caused the Debian Bug report #1062761,
regarding transition: libfm-qt
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1062761: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062761
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: libfm...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:libfm-qt
libfm-qt has bumped its soversion from 13 to 14, so we need a
transition.
All affected packages listed in
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libfm-qt.html
are good in experimental.
Ben file:
title = "libfm-qt";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libfm-qt13" | .depends ~ "libfm-qt14";
is_good = .depends ~ "libfm-qt14";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libfm-qt13";
--
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czchen@{czchen,debian}.org
Key fingerprint = BA04 346D C2E1 FE63 C790 8793 CC65 B0CD EC27 5D5B
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2024-05-08 23:11:42 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 2024-02-03 09:57:00 +0800, ChangZhuo Chen wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: libfm...@packages.debian.org
> > Control: affects -1 + src:libfm-qt
> >
> > libfm-qt has bumped its soversion from 13 to 14, so we need a
> > transition.
> >
> > All affected packages listed in
> > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libfm-qt.html
> > are good in experimental.
>
> Please go ahead.
The old binaries got removed from testing.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---
Processed: Re: Bug#1070689: transition: msgpack-c
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1070689 [release.debian.org] transition: msgpack-c Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1070689: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070689 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1061200: transition: vtk9
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1061200 [release.debian.org] transition: vtk9 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1061200: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061200 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: transition: c-blosc2
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:c-blosc2 Bug #1072343 [release.debian.org] transition: c-blosc2 Added indication that 1072343 affects src:c-blosc2 -- 1072343: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072343 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1071235 by 1072320 Bug #1071235 [release.debian.org] transition: qt6-base 6.6.2 1071235 was not blocked by any bugs. 1071235 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1071235: 1072320 > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1071235: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071235 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: tagging 1072300 ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1072300 + bookworm Bug #1072300 [release.debian.org] RM: phppgadmin/7.13.0+dfsg-2 Added tag(s) bookworm. > retitle 1072300 RM: phppgadmin -- RoM; security issues; incompatible with > bookworm's PostgreSQL version Bug #1072300 [release.debian.org] RM: phppgadmin/7.13.0+dfsg-2 Changed Bug title to 'RM: phppgadmin -- RoM; security issues; incompatible with bookworm's PostgreSQL version' from 'RM: phppgadmin/7.13.0+dfsg-2'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1072300: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072300 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: RM: phppgadmin/7.13.0+dfsg-2
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:phppgadmin Bug #1072300 [release.debian.org] RM: phppgadmin/7.13.0+dfsg-2 Added indication that 1072300 affects src:phppgadmin -- 1072300: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072300 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1053866: marked as done (transition: jpeg-xl)
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1053866 {Done: Mathieu Malaterre } [release.debian.org]
transition: jpeg-xl
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions jpeg-xl/0.8.2-4.
--
1053866: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053866
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1053866: marked as done (transition: jpeg-xl)
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2024 10:34:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1053866: fixed in jpeg-xl 0.8.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1053866, regarding transition: jpeg-xl to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1053866: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053866 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition This is a minor SONAME transiton. Two (unused anywhere) symbols were removed. Current status in exp: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=jpeg-xl=experimental Thanks Ben file: title = "jpeg-xl"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libjxl0.7" | .depends ~ "libjxl0.8"; is_good = .depends ~ "libjxl0.8"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libjxl0.7"; --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: jpeg-xl Source-Version: 0.8.2-4 Done: Mathieu Malaterre We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of jpeg-xl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1053...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Mathieu Malaterre (supplier of updated jpeg-xl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 12:13:58 +0200 Source: jpeg-xl Architecture: source Version: 0.8.2-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian PhotoTools Maintainers Changed-By: Mathieu Malaterre Closes: 1053866 Changes: jpeg-xl (0.8.2-4) unstable; urgency=medium . * Upload 0.8.2-4 to unstable. Closes: #1053866 Checksums-Sha1: 74079e0d151d157c547b7aac8281b0de3aa613a7 3067 jpeg-xl_0.8.2-4.dsc aa105a02cb18dd597205d3170c9da9a64377116c 24156 jpeg-xl_0.8.2-4.debian.tar.xz 754b45bfa2e72590ed1d3c0da843b793ba733e4a 14327 jpeg-xl_0.8.2-4_source.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: b417aece194e4e4f235dafc2de968ba1cdab5dcd7252910054c7153f273b92c4 3067 jpeg-xl_0.8.2-4.dsc 0dd0f4adb427cd76c58c72b3008ee4a07b4045dd24e66171912548620ba8c6cd 24156 jpeg-xl_0.8.2-4.debian.tar.xz 7a25519337b3b8b6c82bf0f920c776ac88a87ce0c6b0873e8cbf61a02b78111a 14327 jpeg-xl_0.8.2-4_source.buildinfo Files: c25131d3341d3d4c955d92fdcd3e9fe5 3067 graphics optional jpeg-xl_0.8.2-4.dsc 69bc9a0ef14e820205001663757ac4ea 24156 graphics optional jpeg-xl_0.8.2-4.debian.tar.xz 327a35804bc2de84295cb70f8a28d71e 14327 graphics optional jpeg-xl_0.8.2-4_source.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJFBAEBCgAvFiEEaTNn/67NjqrNHwY7AXHhgorgk0UFAmZZo00RHG1hbGF0QGRl Ymlhbi5vcmcACgkQAXHhgorgk0WX7RAAgiuKH/+GWnMaji7iL0HfnERAx6f0InxM TXXijRVaKot88zTBnb5+IJokFpPkRGOwHA+3EK4UffjlW91KrGnbxVfNbGs+bbEz YP3EzoArPornXll8qEBLv36PfNYApoYcw4LeBUDgCokZIGCRVS8GAx3P+4UXJMo9 TL0C9EbqLwe/klip4NidKCe2oqX8NdN+jafl4n8PJe59C1ATNBqDd77srGV9ZZcc hleGy7ylSU8XzJTu4z7VNRCe5RlpohAftq9DolL7IU0ruD/rHSkKk4EZJkiqkxiO 5nevg6f47SHJHBwpaK9/AvQF1DMtAUL3EA/EkXbOzfuYWzr3pEXJ4zPk2nir55Ls NZ9HZV0LJzsfqjtAoe/jXX2jsPi9wqd8cS+vYSGPjTkBjZUYCfVuZA885FeqPhlH bDy0NqYb1Ym3mb5Y3AEFvcGRn7vICdJYORtCjb0x1LbwYmLmZnbPW381DJsrF+gb qar3JlCQtXqiZTfB1LjBCzSlCASRRrwzYKoMQeepdQSd9Qm+khPQbh9kp5xMiaT3 BPsJjrFyFmzVslNEd5sE+/hnA2Br4fBTHrNsLOwwTBNV+m+WYonEv0FnZpIqDoJZ EOzrTbolTUeCpPYh/VRogJOiAOvK8DmDkaIZB0Zv/wk2FA2FmwBcdmoEpDllVsAe L2HSxvFTcCA= =EuN5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- pgpJqx7U5bobR.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Processed: FTBFS against libmatio 1.5.27
Processing control commands: > block 1071614 by -1 Bug #1071614 [release.debian.org] transition: libmatio13 1071614 was not blocked by any bugs. 1071614 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1071614: 1072280 -- 1071614: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071614 1072280: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072280 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1071614: transition: libmatio13
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1071614 [release.debian.org] transition: libmatio13 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1071614: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071614 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1053866: transition: jpeg-xl
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1053866 [release.debian.org] transition: jpeg-xl Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1053866: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053866 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1061179: marked as done (transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-13)
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2024 09:08:22 +0300 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1061179: transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-13 has caused the Debian Bug report #1061179, regarding transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-13 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1061179: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061179 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: block -1 by 1060761 1060802 Dear Release team, I have skipped Qt 5.15.11 release and would like to upgrade to 5.15.12 which was published in December. Qt WebEngine will be upgraded from 5.15.15 to 5.15.16. The transition is prepared in experimental. There are two blockers, lomiri-ui-toolkit and stellarium, but I can NMU them. I have submitted a merge request with the ben file: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/transition-data/-/merge_requests/47 -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 07:30:40PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > btw not sure what to do about qtbase-opensource-src's reverse > autopkgtests[1]. Looks like they are having some trouble installing the > right dependencies from unstable. Perhaps they hadn't been rebuilt yet when > the tests were scheduled. Paul, do you have any ideas? And it migrated! \o/ Thanks to Paul for helping me with retrying tests. -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Processed: bullseye-pu: package runc/1.0.0~rc93+ds1-5+deb11u4
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:runc Bug #1072248 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package runc/1.0.0~rc93+ds1-5+deb11u4 Added indication that 1072248 affects src:runc -- 1072248: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072248 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1071121: transition: clamav
Processing control commands: > tags -1 -moreinfo Bug #1071121 [release.debian.org] transition: clamav Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1071121: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071121 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1070977: marked as done (transition: snappy)
Your message dated Thu, 30 May 2024 18:41:51 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1070977: transition: snappy has caused the Debian Bug report #1070977, regarding transition: snappy to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1070977: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070977 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: affects -1 + src:snappy Hi RMs, Upstream of snappy changed function signatures [1] breaking other applications with the 1.2.0 release. I've added back the original function signatures calling the new ones to restore the immediate problem, to restore the ABI. But then this creates ambiguity in the Compress method signatures [2] making (only) ceph FTBFS. While it can be patched to avoid it, a proper transition should be done. I've renamed back the library name which was done due to the C++11 ABI change with g++ 5.0 back in 2015. Thanks for considering, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1070217 [2] https://bugs.debian.org/1070785 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 9:11 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Looks like this got reported upstream and the symbols got re-added: [...] > If that's enough, I assume the package renaming in experimental can be > reverted > and we just update to snappy 1.2.1, keeping the old library package name. That's the best solution already provided. As you noted, the transition is reverted and a normal package update to version 1.2.1 was made. It was built on all architectures, autopkgtests succeeded and the updated snappy is migrated to testing. As such, closing this transition request. Regards, Laszlo/GCS--- End Message ---
Bug#1070852: marked as done (transition: gdal)
Your message dated Thu, 30 May 2024 15:54:40 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1070852: transition: gdal has caused the Debian Bug report #1070852, regarding transition: gdal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1070852: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070852 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: g...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:gdal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 3.8.0. All reverse dependencies except python-django and facet-analyser rebuilt successfully with GDAL 3.9.0 from experimental as summarized below. python-django (3:4.2.11-1) FTBFS due to unrelated test failures. (#1042637) facet-analyser (0.0~git20221121142040.6be10b8+ds1-3) FTBFS due to uninstallable build dependencies. (#1040334) Bugreports can be found using the gdal-3.9 usertag: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-...@lists.debian.org=gdal-3.9 Transition: gdal libgdal34t64 (3.8.5+dfsg-1) -> libgdal35 (3.9.0~beta1+dfsg-1~exp1) The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows. cloudcompare(2.11.3-7.1) OK fiona (1.9.6-1) OK gmt (6.5.0+dfsg-3)OK grass (8.3.2-1) OK libcitygml (2.5.2-1) OK libgeo-gdal-ffi-perl(0.11-2) OK libosmium (2.20.0-1)OK mapcache(1.14.0-4)OK mapnik (3.1.0+ds-7) OK mapproxy(2.0.2+dfsg-1)OK mapserver (8.0.1-4) OK merkaartor (0.19.0+ds-5) OK mysql-workbench (8.0.32+dfsg-2) OK ncl (6.6.2.dfsg.1-7) OK octave-mapping (1.4.2-3) OK openorienteering-mapper (0.9.5-3.1) OK openscenegraph (3.6.5+dfsg1-8) OK paraview(5.11.2+dfsg-6) OK pgsql-ogr-fdw (1.1.4-3) OK pktools (2.6.7.6+ds-6)OK postgis (3.4.2+dfsg-1)OK python-django (3:4.2.11-1) FTBFS (#1042637) qmapshack (1.17.1-1)OK r-cran-sf (1.0-15+dfsg-1) OK r-cran-terra(1.7-65-1)OK rasterio(1.3.10-2)OK saga(9.4.0+dfsg-1)OK vtk9(9.1.0+really9.1.0+dfsg2-7.1) OK facet-analyser (0.0~git20221121142040.6be10b8+ds1-3) FTBFS (#1040334) libgdal-grass (1:1.0.2-7) OK opencv (4.6.0+dfsg-13.1) OK osmcoastline(2.4.0-2) OK qgis(3.34.6+dfsg-1) OK sumo(1.18.0+dfsg-3) OK Kind Regards, Bas --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 26/05/2024 08:36, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 5/24/24 11:46 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 5/24/24 11:29 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 24/05/2024 11:02, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 5/24/24 9:30 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: If that's the case, gdal should probably break older versions of libgdal-grass so that that combination is not possible. That will also make britney happy, otherwise it will block gdal due to the test regression. gdal, grass, and libgdal-grass just need to be tested together. I'd rather drop the autopkgtest test than having to maintain the Breaks in gdal. *shrug*. If that's a runtime check, then there's an issue with the dependencies/breaks, as one could have old libgdal-grass with newer gdal (as is happening in the autopkgtest) and then libgdal-grass is broken. The dependencies of the rebuilt libgdal-grass correctly reflects the required versions of g
Bug#1071473: marked as done (transition: opencascade)
Your message dated Thu, 30 May 2024 15:51:02 +0200 with message-id <7578d548-9f36-433e-9612-8b34bf053...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1071473: transition: opencascade has caused the Debian Bug report #1071473, regarding transition: opencascade to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1071473: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071473 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: opencasc...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:opencascade User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: block 1071284 by -1 Control: block 1071223 by -1 Control: block 1071470 by -1 Control: block 1071451 by -1 Control: block 1071471 by -1 Hi Release team, opencascade has a new release with breaking ABI, upstream versionied them as 7.8. The transition tracker [1] correctly picked it up already after the upload to experimental. [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-opencascade.html building the reverse depenencies most FTBFS due to library naming changes, but I was able to come up with patches for most, but they will require sourceful uploads. Freecad will require either backporting the upstream fixes or package a new upstream snapshot. This is the result of the compilation tests: Dependency level 2: f3d ✔ freecad (sid only) FTBFS, fixed in upstream git. horizon-eda patch available, #1071284 kicad ✔ netgen patch available, #1071223 slic3r-prusa (sid only) patch available, #1071470 Dependency level 3: gmshpatch available, #1071451 Dependency level 4: deal.ii patch available, #1071471 -- Cheers, tobi signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 25/05/2024 00:10, Tobias Frost wrote: Hi Emilio, thanks for the head up! opencascade is now in unstable and has built for all archs except riscv64, where the buildds are just busy right now and as they are currently building huge packages, this could last a few days. I think a strategic Dep-Wait will help :) Level2 : - f3d and kicad could use a binNMU, with a Dep-Wait on libocct-data-exchange-dev (>= 7.8.1) - freecad, netgen has been (team) uploaded. - horizon-eda and slic3r-prusa are both in DELAYED/2. Level3 : - gmsh has been team uploaded. Level4: - deal.ii will be team-uploaded soon. I hinted horizon-eda and opencascade has migrated. Closing. Cheers, Emilio--- End Message ---
Bug#1071948: marked as done (nmu: polymake_4.11-2)
Your message dated Thu, 30 May 2024 09:01:25 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1071948: nmu: polymake_4.11-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1071948, regarding nmu: polymake_4.11-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1071948: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071948 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: polym...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:polymake User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 nmu polymake_4.11-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against libsingular4m4n0" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEkiyHYXwaY0SiY6fqA0U5G1WqFSEFAmZTFZAACgkQA0U5G1Wq FSHLIQ//fw3CHgIWdpwU0gw+W7pnrs2foRdlT4YOLtgUcKIvTKlUIkOJFhDK+wO6 92rh9hGi/JZXRFN8J4VIEhZnGQdL/K3Rc0wzeeszFPYNgc85yBFn+x21IoSW+0wG j24nQQaKuPIkbZTJrw8kD4lvFFVCvf8+w9ykTOxzoSbXEi8ZG5kBmojh3TsveYu9 VRjR4AwDNXrWamGU2YdMGEjgq0yD95NX2vqnhj+PgX/Ufvv4cBBDPPqCzMjuGXYn yCpdhx6W/6TBdWHtQWLImkzpSDetG8Q15WMrWicD1STWOh2+bEiq9W/NcVzOd8xY Vjb2df10kQWJlMf1AgwkFABafyaT/hkHcaaUmDW/GdYSC18Uj6xjrt9Ua6B5dYjR XY9P71Vnmlv8it9tfiAPmFsK6SgXC3nHYHFLP28EVQfN0kkqnk8+vSYmrXCMniCp 2y10VBi60IHj0BZuxoKy3thHdBxamzAai/7Kad6khrN6Yi7beidVuBTFuLga3ph2 aQqs5JZJFa3KG6wtdl+RvQf09z+KbwQo4QCbXZUaz3kh8Kq05NxbuPACiQE56EmB qW9eMp1ryiHQkcIl+gkxQCGhBzDoum8e2gKvAvVewcCiFxGOXt1DyWGxg5RJ8ucu 21ANaSoWS5hxzoBOLqaVbs4vX9ojgy6sjF0Dnn1OqFj1SOpbP7g= =Q4wx -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 26/05/2024 12:57, David Bremner wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: polym...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:polymake User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu polymake_4.11-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against libsingular4m4n0" This got scheduled a few days ago as part of the transition. Emilio--- End Message ---
Processed: Re: Bug#1063770: transition: mupdf
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1063770 [release.debian.org] transition: mupdf Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1063770: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063770 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Update some bugs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1069125 src:zfs-linux 2.1.11-1 Bug #1069125 [zfs-dkms] zfs-dkms: Update stable version to fix data corruption bug Bug reassigned from package 'zfs-dkms' to 'src:zfs-linux'. No longer marked as found in versions zfs-linux/2.1.11-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1069125 to the same values previously set Bug #1069125 [src:zfs-linux] zfs-dkms: Update stable version to fix data corruption bug Marked as found in versions zfs-linux/2.1.11-1. > forcemerge 1063497 1069125 Bug #1063497 [src:zfs-linux] zfs-dkms: Data loss bug in version in bookworm Bug #1069125 [src:zfs-linux] zfs-dkms: Update stable version to fix data corruption bug Severity set to 'critical' from 'important' 1069125 was not blocked by any bugs. 1069125 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1069125: 1042730 Marked as fixed in versions zfs-linux/2.1.14-1. Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. Merged 1063497 1069125 > reassign 1038155 src:zfs-linux Bug #1038155 [zfs-linux] zfs-linux: Provide a package based on OpenZFS master branch (a.k.a. 2.1.99) Bug reassigned from package 'zfs-linux' to 'src:zfs-linux'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1038155 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1038155 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1038155: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038155 1063497: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063497 1069125: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069125 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: systemd 252.26-1~deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1072098 = bookworm pending Bug #1072098 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package systemd/252.26-1~deb12u1 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1072098: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072098 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: bookworm-pu: package cloud-init/22.4.2-1
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:cloud-init Bug #1072122 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package cloud-init/22.4.2-1 Added indication that 1072122 affects src:cloud-init -- 1072122: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072122 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: netcfg 1.187+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1071574 = bookworm pending Bug #1071574 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package netcfg/1.187+deb12u1 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1071574: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071574 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: bookworm-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:dns-root-data Bug #1072035 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801 Added indication that 1072035 affects src:dns-root-data -- 1072035: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072035 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: org-mode 9.4.0+dfsg-1+deb11u2 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1071417 = bullseye pending Bug #1071417 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package fossil/2.15.2-1+deb11u1 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1071417: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071417 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: emacs 27.1+1-3.1+deb11u4 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1069943 = bullseye pending Bug #1069943 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package emacs/27.1+1-3.1+deb11u4 Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1069943: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069943 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: retitle 1036083 to bullseye-pu: package galera-4 26.4.18-0+deb11u1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1036083 bullseye-pu: package galera-4 26.4.18-0+deb11u1 Bug #1036083 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package galera-4 26.4.14-0+deb11u1 Bug #1069802 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package galera-4 26.4.18-0+deb11u1 Changed Bug title to 'bullseye-pu: package galera-4 26.4.18-0+deb11u1' from 'bullseye-pu: package galera-4 26.4.14-0+deb11u1'. Ignoring request to change the title of bug#1069802 to the same title > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1036083: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036083 1069802: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069802 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: forcibly merging 1069802 1036083
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1069802 1036083 Bug #1069802 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package galera-4 26.4.18-0+deb11u1 Bug #1036083 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package galera-4 26.4.14-0+deb11u1 Added indication that 1036083 affects src:galera-4 Merged 1036083 1069802 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1036083: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036083 1069802: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069802 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1069802: bullseye-pu: package galera-4 26.4.18-0+deb11u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1069802 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package galera-4 26.4.18-0+deb11u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1069802: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069802 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1069639: Acknowledgement (bookworm-pu: package galera-4 26.4.18-0+deb12u1)
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1069639 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package galera-4 26.4.18-0+deb12u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1069639: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069639 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: block 1071926 with 1050237
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1071926 with 1050237 Bug #1071926 [gnome-shell-extension-appindicator] gnome-shell-extension-appindicator fails to install - dependency issue 1071926 was not blocked by any bugs. 1071926 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1071926: 1050237 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1071926: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071926 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: nmu: polymake_4.11-2
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:polymake Bug #1071948 [release.debian.org] nmu: polymake_4.11-2 Added indication that 1071948 affects src:polymake -- 1071948: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071948 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1066031: marked as done (nmu: zeromq3)
Your message dated Sun, 26 May 2024 17:48:20 +0900 with message-id <20240526174820.2f3b86e9@jet> and subject line Re: Your mail has caused the Debian Bug report #1066031, regarding nmu: zeromq3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066031: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066031 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:zeromq3 X-Debbugs-Cc: zero...@packages.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org Severity: normal libzmq5 depends on obsolete runtime libraries. $ apt-cache depends libzmq5 libzmq5 Depends: libbsd0 Depends: libc6 Depends: libgcc-s1 Depends: libgssapi-krb5-2 Depends: libnorm1 Depends: libpgm-5.3-0 Depends: libsodium23 Depends: libstdc++6 But libnorm1 and libpgm-5.3-0 already have 64 bit time_t transitioned version, (libnorm1t64 and libpgm-5.3-0t64) so It should be rebuilt against newer runtime again. gb zeromq3_4.3.5-1+b1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild to sync with 64bit time_t runtime dependency." Thanks, --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- This issue was already fixed with auto rebuild.--- End Message ---
Processed: systemd 252.25-1~deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1069881 = bookworm pending Bug #1069881 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package systemd/252.25-1~deb12u1 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1069881 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1069881: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069881 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: systemd 252.24-1~deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1069881 = bookworm pending Bug #1069881 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package systemd/252.25-1~deb12u1 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1069881: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069881 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: riseup-vpn 0.21.11+ds1-5+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1070856 = bookworm pending Bug #1070856 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package riseup-vpn/0.21.11+ds1-5+deb12u1 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1070856: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070856 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: glib2.0 2.74.6-2+deb12u3 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1071159 = bookworm pending Bug #1071159 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package glib2.0/2.74.6-2+deb12u3 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1071159: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071159 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: dpdk 22.11.5-1~deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1069720 = bookworm pending Bug #1069720 [release.debian.org] bookworm: package dpdk/22.11.5-1~deb12u1 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1069720: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069720 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: qemu 7.2+dfsg-7+deb12u6 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1070801 = bookworm pending Bug #1070801 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package qemu/1:7.2+dfsg-7+deb12u6 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1070801: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070801 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1066965: bookworm-pu: package newlib/3.3.0-2
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #1066965 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package newlib/3.3.0-2 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1066965: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066965 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: untag
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1063770 - moreinfo Bug #1063770 [release.debian.org] transition: mupdf Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1063770: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063770 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: json-smart 2.2-2+deb11u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1068694 = bullseye pending Bug #1068694 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package json-smart/2.2-2+deb11u1 Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1068694: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068694 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: json-smart 2.2-2+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1068695 = bookworm pending Bug #1068695 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package json-smart/2.2-2+deb12u1 Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1068695: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068695 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1069943: bullseye-pu: package emacs/27.1+1-3.1+deb11u3
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1069943 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package emacs/27.1+1-3.1+deb11u3 Added tag(s) confirmed. > retitle -1 bullseye-pu: package emacs/27.1+1-3.1+deb11u4 Bug #1069943 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package emacs/27.1+1-3.1+deb11u3 Changed Bug title to 'bullseye-pu: package emacs/27.1+1-3.1+deb11u4' from 'bullseye-pu: package emacs/27.1+1-3.1+deb11u3'. -- 1069943: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069943 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
