Re: Grep... in Debian 2.0

1998-04-15 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Carroll Kong wrote:

   Doh... ok.  I vaguely remember someone speaking of this problem before..
 but my grep is dead.  Should I get the old package and install it?  The
 newone... although it seems to work.. once I try grep text string * it does
 not return anything?  Have I been using this the wrong way before?  It worked
 fine that way before 

Upgrade to the latest, 2.1-8.  It's fixed.

Bob


Bob Nielsen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson, AZ  AMPRnet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


19980414 Work-Needing and Prospective Packages

1998-04-15 Thread wnpp


  Work-Needing and Prospective Packages for Debian GNU/Linux
   
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   $Id: prospective-packages.html,v 1.10 1998/04/14 23:37:33 johnie Exp $
   
   
   This document is intended to identify areas that need your
   contributions. It provides information that hopefully changes quite
   often, so it supplements the regular Debian Developer documentation:
   [1]http://www.debian.org/developers_corner.html. This document
   provides the current list of packages which are either:
   
 * orphaned,
 * withdrawn from the unstable distribution,
 * maintained but its developer would like to find a new person,
 * currently being worked on to include in the distribution, and
 * good ideas -- they would be nice to have, but no one is yet
   working on them.
   
   New versions of this document will be available via FTP and HTTP:
   
 * [2]http://www.debian.org/doc/prospective-packages.html
 * [3]ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/doc/package-developer/prospective-p
   ackages.txt
 * [4]ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/doc/package-developer/prospective-p
   ackages.html
   
   Please send additions, corrections, suggestions and wishes to the WNPP
   maintainer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Please mention which version of this
   document your comments refer.
   
   Try to change the subject of your mail to reflect the packages you're
   talking about, it makes it easier for to sort out all Re:
   Work-Needing and Prospective Packages emails. A suggested subject
   line reads WNPP: removing foopackage or WNPP: working on
   barpackage. Thanks.
 _
   
Recent Changes
   
Since version 1998/04/07

   The pdftex program is now uploaded (as part of tetex).
   
   Packages needing a new maintainer
 * The xpdf package, offered by Dirk Eddelbuettel ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
   needs a free-world maintainer so it can support encrypted PDF
   files.
 * The omniORB package is offered by Robert Resendes
   ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
   
   Packages adopted
 * The dosfstools package is adopted by Roman Hodek
   ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
 * The ntfs package is adopted by Damjan Marion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
   
   Packages being created
 * VAT (the LBNL audio tool), the xmmix package, the xrn newsreader,
   the f77reorder , and nt (a mbone shared text editor) are being
   packaged by Alex Romosan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
 * Nessus is being packaged by Nils Lohner
   ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
 * The jstation suite for amateur radio ground stations is being
   packaged by Bdale Garbee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
 * The sfio package is being created by Dennis Clark
   ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
 * Chamelion, a program that uses GTK and imlib to draw into the root
   window, is being packaged by Shaleh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
 * The tcputils pakcage is being created by Bjoern Brenander
   ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
 * Packages for xfont3d and xfpovray are being created by Matt
   Pavlovich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
 * The CODA distributed filesystem tools are being packaged by Anders
   Hammarquist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
   
   Packages someone could package for Debian 2.1
 * BeroFTPD 1.0.1, a wu-ftpd derived ftp server program.
 * The Emacs module for perl, perlmacs.
   
   
 _
   
   Orphaned packages
   
   An orphaned package is a package that has no current maintainer.
   Please inform the WNPP maintainer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) via e-mail:
   
 * when you find that you need to orphan a package,
 * when you believe that the following list is incomplete, or
 * when you would like to maintain one of these packages.
   
   To correct the developer recorded for a package, inform the override
   file maintainer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
   
   The following packages are orphaned:
   
   By the Debian QA Group (debian-qa@lists.debian.org):
   
 * 9wm -- An emulation of the Plan 9 window manager 8-1/2
 * bibindex -- fast lookup in BibTeX bibliography data bases
 * latex2rtf -- LaTeX text to RTF format translator
 * libtclobjc -- development library
 * mcvert -- Tool to deal with specially encoded Macintosh files
   (non-free)
 * objpak -- An Objective-C collection class library
 * pari -- A package for number theorists (non-free)
 * paridoc -- The documentation and examples for the PARI system
   (non-free)
 * rc -- An implementation of the ATT Plan 9 shell.
 * sam -- A plan9 derived text editor
 * xabacus -- Implementation of the classic Chinese abacus
 * xbattle -- A concurrent multi-player battle strategy game
 * xmcpustate -- Displays 

procmail question

1998-04-15 Thread Vaclav Hula
Hi all there!
I just set-up my .procmailrc (Many thanks to Oliver Elphick). But I have big 
mailbox (/var/spool/mail/) I want to process w. procmail. Can anybody tell me 
how?

Thanks.
Ax
-- 
Vaclav Hula
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~ax


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Grep... in Debian 2.0

1998-04-15 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Apr 14, 1998 at 06:56:38PM -0400, Carroll Kong wrote:
   Doh... ok.  I vaguely remember someone speaking of this problem before..
 but my grep is dead.  Should I get the old package and install it?  The
 newone... although it seems to work.. once I try grep text string * it does
 not return anything?  Have I been using this the wrong way before?  It worked
 fine that way before 

Only bad is 2.1-6, every other version is fine.

You did everything correct. the bad one just returns. Ever.

Marcus

-- 
Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.Debian GNU/Linuxfinger brinkmd@ 
Marcus Brinkmann   http://www.debian.orgmaster.debian.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]for public  PGP Key
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/   PGP Key ID 36E7CD09


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Wanted !!! : elf-x11r6lib de@d or @live :)

1998-04-15 Thread Paul Miller
On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:

 On Tue, Apr 14, 1998 at 10:35:52PM +0200, Pierre Dupuis wrote:
  Hello,
  
  to install Tkrat, I need something called elf-x11r6lib, i've looked all
  around debian ftp site and don't found it :,(
  
  If someone know where can i get it :)
 
 You can safely ignore this dependency. elf-x11r6lib is a virtual package
 that is no longer needed.
 
 Use dpkg -i --force-depends package to froce the installation.
 
 Marcus

You could also use the equivs package to make a fake elf-x11r6lib
package.. Sometimes it's nice to get rid of dselect's constant warning
about some packages.. :)

-Paul

P.S.  I've never used equivs, so I might be wrong..



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: procmail question

1998-04-15 Thread Art Lemasters
 Hi all there!
 I just set-up my .procmailrc (Many thanks to Oliver Elphick). But I have big 
 mailbox (/var/spool/mail/) I want to process w. procmail. Can anybody tell me 
 how?

 Try the procmail and procmailex (examples) man or info (better yet)
pages.  They are some of the better-written documents I've seen!  Oh...
and read the /usr/doc/procmail directory (.gz files with the zless
command) first!  The examples in the procmailex page should be most
helpful, then more specific questions will be easier to get answers
for.  You'll do fine! 

Art

 
 Thanks.
 Ax
 -- 
 Vaclav Hula
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~ax
 
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Viewing pdf files

1998-04-15 Thread Mark Phillips

Hi,

I want to view a pdf file, so I used xpdf but got the following:
$ xpdf cgtntk.pdf 
xpdf version 0.6
Copyright  1996 Derek B. Noonburg
Error: PDF file is encrypted and cannot be displayed
Error: * Decryption support is currently not included in xpdf
Error: * due to legal restrictions: the U.S.A. still has bogus
Error: * export controls on cryptography software.
Error: Couldn't read xref table

Any ideas on how I can view this file without going to windows 95?

Cheers,

Mark.

__
_\/___\__/___Mark_Phillips___/
\__/_\__/--\__/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
\__/HE___\__/--APTAIN/   
\__/_\__/--\__/__/  /__To be is to do.__I. Kant___/
\__/__\__/___/  /__To do is to be.__A. Sartre_/
/__I am.God___/
/__Jesus did.___/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Viewing pdf files

1998-04-15 Thread Joey Hess
Mark Phillips wrote:
 I want to view a pdf file, so I used xpdf but got the following:
   $ xpdf cgtntk.pdf 
   xpdf version 0.6
   Copyright  1996 Derek B. Noonburg
   Error: PDF file is encrypted and cannot be displayed
   Error: * Decryption support is currently not included in xpdf
   Error: * due to legal restrictions: the U.S.A. still has bogus
   Error: * export controls on cryptography software.
   Error: Couldn't read xref table
 
 Any ideas on how I can view this file without going to windows 95?

Try installing the acroread package.

-- 
see shy jo


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


How can I add the 3rd ethernet card ?

1998-04-15 Thread Stellar R'espree
Hi,

I use a PC linux machine with 2 ethernet cards. (one for eth0, the other
for eth1).
And now, I want to add third ethernet card.

It is recognized as eht2 at my machine, but when I tried to following
command,

/sbin/ifconfig eth2 123.123.123.123 broadcast 123.123.123.255
netmask 255.255.255.0

it prints following error message.

SIOCSIFFLAGS: Try again

Do you know what the problem is ?

Thanks in advance.

stellar
begin:  vcard
fn: Stellar R'espree
n:  R'espree;Stellar
org:SoftForum
email;internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-cpt:  ;0
x-mozilla-html: FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard



Re: procmail question

1998-04-15 Thread Carl Mummert
Art Lemasters wrote:
  Try the procmail and procmailex (examples) man or info (better yet)
 pages.  They are some of the better-written documents I've seen!  Oh...
 and read the /usr/doc/procmail directory (.gz files with the zless
 command) first!  The examples in the procmailex page should be most
 helpful, then more specific questions will be easier to get answers
 for.  You'll do fine! 

I think his question was I have mail I already received, how do I get it
filtered?

The answer: formail, a program that comes with procmail.  Basicly, you
will move oyur /var/spool/mail/user file to a temp file, rm the
/var/spool/mial/user, and then cat the temp file throuch formail, which
will remail it all.

Look at formail(1) for the command line options.

Carl

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
The sun's not eternal
   That's why there's the blues...
 -- Ginsburg


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ppp Questions.

1998-04-15 Thread Petra Kevin J Poorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:

 On Mon, Apr 13, 1998 at 08:23:36PM -0500, Petra Kevin J Poorman wrote:
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  
  Hi,
  
  I installed pppconfig, configured my ppp setup for my ISP and got pon to
  work, VS, my old one line script that was broken by the ppp. Now when i
  dial my isp I find these messages in my syslog:
  Apr 13 19:22:30 petra pppd[11431]: local  IP address 209.113.53.194
  Apr 13 19:22:30 petra pppd[11431]: remote IP address 209.113.55.254
  Apr 13 19:23:00 petra pppd[11431]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x1 magic=0x7df7]
  Apr 13 19:23:00 petra pppd[11431]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x1 magic=0x0]
  Apr 13 19:23:30 petra pppd[11431]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x2 magic=0x7df7]
  Apr 13 19:23:30 petra pppd[11431]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x2 magic=0x0]
  
  Could anyone tell me what this means?...
 
 This means that you have the official IP adress 209.113.53.194. At this
 time, people could try to telnet your machine from anywhere in the internet.
 This adress is a dynamically assigned valid IP adress. So, if you have
 apache web server installed, people could even point netscape at
 http://209.113.53.194, and see your locally installed web pages ;)
 
 You connected to host 209.113.55.254, which is the server that you diald-in.
 

I knew about the IP stuff what I was wondering was wether or not this
stuff: Apr 13 19:23:00 petra pppd[11431]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x1
magic=0x7df7] was healthy, and by the way it INVAIDS my syslog, but
flooding it, I couldn't see how it could be heathly... so I thought I
would ask about how to fix it, meaning how to get pppd to stop flooding
my syslog, with information I can't make heads or tails of Guess I
shouldn't e-mail past midnight, I lose mental corodonation, and prowess.

 The next four lines just give information about transferred packages.

What do you mean by transferd packages?

 
  How to fix it?... also is there a
 
 Nothing wrong here. I think you can remove debug from your ppp config
 file. I don't know how much less verbose ppp would get then...

Ah, so thats what it is... Debug information, in what config file would I
find the debug line in order to remove it?

 
  way to get ppp to tell me how fast it has conected to my ISP at?...
 
 Sorry, don't remember. Probably I never knew ;)

Well another kind Debian Developer (Thanks John) said this:

Add a REPORT string to /etc/chatscripts/provider, like this:

REPORT CONNECT

And tell chat where to put the report string by giving it the '-r' option
in /etc/ppp/peers/provider, like this:

connect /usr/sbin/chat -v -r /etc/ppp/report -f
/etc/chatscripts/provider
Now just read /etc/ppp/report to see everything that the modem reported
when it connected.


- -K


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQB1AwUBNTQEzxsA5GylAiwdAQHUXQL+LWopAFjNomJ/noAAXZ7TZSaRR0WSmN4w
EyKBD7K4PlqjNc+pQAlgc5UosApad1RkbDRhEAsTCf3BPn+IG9dt0H8taDZhwuKh
1k7NcuNxd621ktu4ZaJv/D8ePyTaBnHr
=IBIS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Assistance

1998-04-15 Thread Joel C. Rando
On behalf of Stephen J. Carpenter:

I have not gotten an e-mail off of my server since the computer went
down Thursday 4/9/98, so I would appreciate replies directed to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

My computer went down Thursday due to hardware related problems. I
replaced the Motherboard and am still having problems. I believe that
the problems are related to the new Motherboard. I've tried swapping the
processors and various other parts of the computer.
Analytical procedure was as follows:
1. Boot MS-DOS.
2. Run the boot batch file off of the Debianv1.3r6 installation CD
3. The install is fine, including fdisk, format and bad block check.
4. Unfortunately it will not boot!
5. I boot the installation disk and go to the second virtual terminal
and run E2FSCK -F /dev /HDA
  Result: File system errors... otherwise, the computer is fine.

Someone who checked this motherboard installed windows 95 properly
The board is a Biosys 8500 TTD (TX Chipset)
I have no info for the IDE chipset or settings.
  Any info you might have would be greatly appreciated.
-Thanx,   SJC


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Dselect fails?

1998-04-15 Thread Carroll Kong
Hm...  sorry for bothering everyone with my feeble questions... but
after installing Debian 2.0... i try running dselect, and everytime I try to get
files, it say file does not exist blah blah blah... I updated my database
across the ftp.debian.org with the hamm contrib non-free.  Is this wrong?  Any
ideas guys?  I am pretty sure the links really do work and exist, I tried to
trace them myself.  Not that I mind running around in ncftp and dpkg -i deb.deb
packages myself.. but it would be nice.  :)  


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Dselect fails?

1998-04-15 Thread Will Lowe
On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Carroll Kong wrote:

 after installing Debian 2.0... i try running dselect, and everytime I try to 
 get
 files, it say file does not exist blah blah blah... I updated my database
 across the ftp.debian.org with the hamm contrib non-free.  Is this wrong?  
 Any

Did it say it correctly found the packages.gz files?

And did you answer YES to the Download required files? question?

Will


--
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |
|   http://www.cis.udel.edu/~lowe/   |
|PGP Public Key:  http://www.cis.udel.edu/~lowe/index.html#pgpkey|
--
|   You think you're so smart,  but I've seen you naked  |
|  and I'll prob'ly see you naked again ...  |
| --The Barenaked Ladies,  Blame It On Me  |
--


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Dselect fails?

1998-04-15 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Carroll Kong wrote:

   Hm...  sorry for bothering everyone with my feeble questions... but
 after installing Debian 2.0... i try running dselect, and everytime I try to 
 get
 files, it say file does not exist blah blah blah... I updated my database
 across the ftp.debian.org with the hamm contrib non-free.  Is this wrong?  
 Any
 ideas guys?  I am pretty sure the links really do work and exist, I tried to
 trace them myself.  Not that I mind running around in ncftp and dpkg -i 
 deb.deb
 packages myself.. but it would be nice.  :)  

Use dists/frozen/main dists/frozen/contrib dists/frozen/non-free.  It
works fine for me.

Bob


Bob Nielsen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson, AZ  AMPRnet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Another Debian 2.0 Question - GMT

1998-04-15 Thread Carroll Kong
Okay... this is getting semi-annoying, I do not know why my clock
automagically changes back about 4 hours behind.. maybe 5.  My local clock is
fine, it worked fine in Debian 1.3R6, but after installing Debian 2.0
(upgrading), it changed into some odd time.  I think it has something to do with
/usr/lib/zoneinfo/localtime but it is a weird binary?  Can I turn my clock
back to Eastern Standard Time?  Or does anyone know why it is doing this?  Does
hwclock -a $GMT have anything to do with it (this is in my /etc/init.d/boot).


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Where did my init.d/boot go?

1998-04-15 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Mirek Kwasniak wrote:

 On Mon, Apr 06, 1998 at 11:42:50PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Since hamm was frozen, I started the process of updating my bo system.
  I've been running hamm now for a week or so, and using FTP to update all
  of my out-of-date packages. Last night I installed some of the new
  packages, ( of which the only important one I remember was sysvinit ), and
  when I rebooted my system, I was no longer able to open a tty, and thus
  even though I logged in, and Linux validated my password, it was unable to
  give me a shell.
  
  After examining the boot messages, and seeing a line that said 'unable to
  find /etc/init.d/boot', I booted up from a beautiful little slackware
  rescue disk, and saw that my boot was now boot.OLD.
  
  How do I find out what package did this?
  
  I assume that whatever package moved my boot to boot.OLD, was intending to
  write a new file. Do I need this new boot file?  My system seems to be
  running fine w/ my old boot.
  
 
 Your install is broken by buggy grep 2.1-6.
 I got the same result but I upgrade a copy of my system :)
 Get grep 2.1-7 and maybe reinstall all packages by hand (whith: dpkg -i).

No, these are two different problems. grep_2.1-6 is severely broken and
should be replaced by a newer version. The boot.OLD file is not a bug or
an error, it is intended behaviour. The /etc/init.d/boot script has bee
split up into several scripts. Take a look in /etc/rcS.d/ to see what it
run in which order ar boot time.

If your sysvinit is really broken, you can boot Linux directly into bash.
At the LILO boot prompt, type

linux init=/bin/bash

This will load bash instead of init, so you get a root shell with no
questions asked.

Remco


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Software RAID configuration in hamm install?

1998-04-15 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On Wed, 8 Apr 1998, Ulisses Alonso Camaro wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 I'm novice to RAID, and I want to try with it. I would like to know if
 hamm provices in its installation the tools to setup a RAID0 (stripping)
 installation. Also I would like to know if the menu for installation has
 RAID0 configuration options
 
 Thanks in advance,
 
   Ulisses
 
 PD: Does debian.org ships hamm?

Sorry for the late reply, I am catching up with the mailing list.

Yes, hamm has tools for RAID0. You'll want the mdutils package, which
contains all tools you need. I don't know about the standard kernel, you
might have to compile your own with support for MD and RAID0 turned on. I
don't think there is a menu that configures the whole thing for you, but
it is not difficult to do it by hand. Basically, you do this:

1. get a kernel that supports RAID0 (and boot it).
2. instal the mdutils package.
3. choose the partitions (or whole disks) that will form the RAID0 device.
   for example, say these are /dev/hda1 and /dev/hdc3
4. run these commands:
# mdcreate raid0 /dev/md0 /dev/hda1 /dev/hdc3
# mdadd -ar
# mke2fs /dev/md0
5. mount the RAID0 partition where you want it.

Note, that it will be difficult to get the root filesystem on the RAID0
device since the RAID0 device is only active after the mdadd program is
run (Debian does this automatically at boot time if you have configured
any MD devices). This is approximately how my setup used to be when I had
a RAID0 device:

DOS partition: /dev/hda1
extended partition: /dev/hda2
root file system: /dev/hda5
RAID0 system: /dev/hda6 and /dev/hdc2
swap: /dev/hda7 and /dev/hdc1

RAID0 device mounted on /mddrive
/mddrive contains home, usr and var
root filesystem contains symlinks for /home, /usr and /var

For more (detailed) information, look at these documents on a Debian
system:

/usr/doc/HOWTO/Root-RAID-HOWTO.gz
/usr/doc/HOWTO/mini/Software-RAID.gz
and the man pages for mdadd, mdcreate, etc.

Remco


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: debian-user-digest Digest V98 #157

1998-04-15 Thread Pascal MIQUET
Hello cam,

How lucky you are,
because, I've got a PS/2 a 8580 model 386 processor, with SCSI
controller, no ESDI, and I'm unable to install the CDRom :(

what kind of configuration are you using ?

 
 Subject: Help with a PS/2 mouse and X11
 Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 12:41:49 -0500
 From: Cam Vetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Debian User List debian-user@lists.debian.org
 
 I installed off of the 1.3.1 CD's, and haven't been able to get my mouse to
 work with anything yet.  (What program's could I test with besides X11?)
 The mouse is a PS/2 style Logitech Mouseman 3 button mouse.
 
 I went into XF86Config and tried the following settings:
 mouse protocol: mouseman (also tried microsoft)
 mouse device: /dev/ttys0 (also tried /dev/mouse)
 baud rate: 1200
 
 I get no response from the mouse cursor on screen after applying these
 settings.  After reading a couple of how-to faqs, I also tried gpm -k
 before running XF86Config.   I don't think this is the problem though since
 it seems to be using my com1 port. (which has nothing attaching to it).
 
 Can anyone tell me what I'm missing?
 
 Cam Vetter
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ICQ UIN: 545211
 

--
(PD: We have an agreement with God,
 He doesn't fix programs and
 we don't make miracles.  )


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SyQuest internal IDE 1GB disk?

1998-04-15 Thread Mark Ciciretti
I found what Marcus was talking about at Mega Haus http://www.megahaus.com

Here is the description of it:

  Part of the DataPort Removable Bracket Family. DataPort IDE removable hard
drive kit. Complete kit includes 3.5 IDE plastic cartridge and a metal IDE
receiving frame. Receiving frame mounts in 5 1/4 drive bay. Mount IDE 3.5
 hard drive in cartridge and insert cartridge into receiving frame. It's that
easy! Built in cooling fan helps keep your drive COOL. If you need to use
multiple drives in one computer, just use as many extra cartridges as you need.
If you need to use the same drive in different computers, use as many 
extra frames as you need.

 
On 13-Apr-98 Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
 Do you need to switch the computer off to plug the HD?
 
 I could imagine that this isn't the best solution for all people.
 
 I remember a german computer vendor VOBIS having 5 1/4 cases and
 removeable HD to plug in / out. I think it wasn't the great success (never
 saw them again).
 
 What about DDT-2/3 ?
 
 Marcus
 
 -- 
 Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.Debian GNU/Linuxfinger brinkmd@ 
 Marcus Brinkmann   http://www.debian.orgmaster.debian.org
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]for public  PGP
 Key
 http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/   PGP Key ID
 36E7CD09

--
E-Mail: Mark Ciciretti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 14-Apr-98
Time: 22:02:25

--


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


New drive---lilo warning

1998-04-15 Thread Mark Phillips

Hi,

I have just installed a third IDE hard drive (my board supports up to 4). 
I have configured the BIOS.  Now I want to use lilo to make it possible to
boot from it (it currently has DOS on it), but when I try, it comes up
with: 

# lilo
Added linux *
Added dos
ide: probable bad entry for /dev/hdc
ide: to fix it, run:  /usr/src/linux/scripts/MAKEDEV.ide
Warning: BIOS drive 0x82 may not be accessible
ide: probable bad entry for /dev/hdc
ide: to fix it, run:  /usr/src/linux/scripts/MAKEDEV.ide
Warning: BIOS drive 0x82 may not be accessible
Added dad

I don't know whether to believe its explanation.  I suspect something else
might be wrong.  Any ideas?

Mark.

P.S. My lilo.conf is the following:

boot=/dev/hda
compact
install=/boot/boot.b
map=/boot/map
vga=normal
delay=20
# Linux bootable partition config begins
image=/vmlinuz
  root=/dev/hda1
  label=linux
  read-only
# Linux bootable partition config ends
# DOS bootable partition config begins
other = /dev/hdb1
  label = dos
  loader = /boot/any_d.b
  table = /dev/hdb
# DOS bootable partition config ends
# DOS bootable partition config begins
other = /dev/hdc1
  label = dad
  loader = /boot/any_d.b
  table = /dev/hdc
# DOS bootable partition config ends

__
_\/___\__/___Mark_Phillips___/
\__/_\__/--\__/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
\__/HE___\__/--APTAIN/   
\__/_\__/--\__/__/  /__To be is to do.__I. Kant___/
\__/__\__/___/  /__To do is to be.__A. Sartre_/
/__I am.God___/
/__Jesus did.___/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Upgrading to hamm

1998-04-15 Thread Chris

Hi,

I am currently running a debian bo system, and I am considering upgrading
(or more to the point - re-installing) to a hamm system.

I am, however, conserned about stablility...

Does anyone know of any major problems with a hamm system?

Chris


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Netscape and Mozilla both choke on bookmark operations

1998-04-15 Thread King Lee


On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Alan Eugene Davis wrote:

 I have a large netscape bookmark file of several hundred bookmarks.  
 Manipulating these has become a pain.  Whenever I edit bookmarks---in either 
 Netscape 4.03 or a Mozilla package from a couple weeks ago---and try to 
 change 
 to sort by last access, Netscape goes berzerk.  The graphics on the netscape 
 window fail to refresh within some minutes, and both netscape and mozilla in 
 these cases become totally unuseable.
 
This may not solve your problem-- but I created my private HTML
page on my disk of interesting (to me links). This supplements
my book mark file.  Useful maybe B if you do not constantly add and
delete bookmarks.

King Lee



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Faster swap by using separate disk?

1998-04-15 Thread Mark Phillips

I have been wondering about whether putting a swap partition on one IDE
drive, while putting most of linux on a different IDE drive will speed up
swap by allowing both disks to be accessed at the same time.

Unfortunately I think I read somewhere that when you have a Master/Slave
IDE pair, only one of the disks can be accessed at any one time, so that
having the swap partition on a separate disk doesn't help.

However my motherboard is capable of using 4 ide devices.  It has two
pairs:

Primary Master/Primary Slave
and
Secondary Master/Secondary Slave

What if I put linux on one of the primary disks, and the swap partition on
a secondary disk, will that mean both disks can be accessed at the same
time, hence giving a swap speedup?

Thanks,

Mark.

__
_\/___\__/___Mark_Phillips___/
\__/_\__/--\__/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
\__/HE___\__/--APTAIN/   
\__/_\__/--\__/__/  /__To be is to do.__I. Kant___/
\__/__\__/___/  /__To do is to be.__A. Sartre_/
/__I am.God___/
/__Jesus did.___/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Upgrading to hamm

1998-04-15 Thread Angel Vicente Perez
 Only on systems that have run 2.0.33.  All systems running 2.0.32 are
 fine.  There are none of the problems that Red Hat has been having with
 its 5.0 release.

I'd like more info about kernel 2.0.33. We have a linux box running 2.0.33 and 
nearly all packets from hamm, and I afraid...


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Upgrading to hamm

1998-04-15 Thread Erik A Nelson


On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Angel Vicente Perez wrote:

  Only on systems that have run 2.0.33.  All systems running 2.0.32 are
  fine.  There are none of the problems that Red Hat has been having with
  its 5.0 release.
 
 I'd like more info about kernel 2.0.33. We have a linux box running 2.0.33 
 and 
 nearly all packets from hamm, and I afraid...

I have trouble with 2.0 kernels and my hardware.. I've previously had
2.1.83 working fine on a bo installation. For a whole variety of reasons,
I have to reinstall, and I'd like to do so with hamm.. does anyone know of
any problems with the newest kernels (2.1.94?) and hamm?

I'll also ask again if anyone knows what I should do to make a bootable
hamm installation CD.

thanks

erik




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Viewing pdf files

1998-04-15 Thread Ulisses Alonso Camaro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Hi Mark!


This not answer your question, but...

Did you tried with gv, it's also a gs frontend but much nicer and _useful_

regards,


Ulisses
- -
Computers are useless. They can only give answers.Pablo Picasso

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: latin1
Comment: PGP public key avaliable at http://www.rediris.es/cert/keyserver

iQB1AwUBNTRkLg/N+5+NQ63pAQEXcwL/TxP2SqgkvOGbh9GP86rmOml0QZ2rqNvx
jAMcfrbIOdCLQG5CdEXwY47jLp1eyI2H9fOaGIGpzz+/R6NhHMsIXLhs4UIP86t/
J+Gt1Ton4EcubETGYpDTSafjwD7vQnhc
=Uvyq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Viewing pdf files

1998-04-15 Thread Mark Phillips

 This not answer your question, but...
 
 Did you tried with gv, it's also a gs frontend but much nicer and _useful_

Yes I did try, but it didn't work.

Cheers,

Mark.

__
_\/___\__/___Mark_Phillips___/
\__/_\__/--\__/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
\__/HE___\__/--APTAIN/   
\__/_\__/--\__/__/  /__To be is to do.__I. Kant___/
\__/__\__/___/  /__To do is to be.__A. Sartre_/
/__I am.God___/
/__Jesus did.___/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Software RAID configuration in hamm install?

1998-04-15 Thread Ulisses Alonso Camaro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Hello Remco!

On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:

 On Wed, 8 Apr 1998, Ulisses Alonso Camaro wrote:
 
  Hi all,
  
  I'm novice to RAID, and I want to try with it. I would like to know if
  hamm provices in its installation the tools to setup a RAID0 (stripping)
  installation. Also I would like to know if the menu for installation has
  RAID0 configuration options
  
  Thanks in advance,
  
  Ulisses
  
  PD: Does debian.org ships hamm?
 
 Sorry for the late reply, I am catching up with the mailing list.

Thanks for your reply! :-)

Your info is great for me!

...but... you have make a mistake ;-) 
in hamm mdutils has been replaced by raidtools


 Yes, hamm has tools for RAID0. You'll want the mdutils package, which
 contains all tools you need. I don't know about the standard kernel, you
 might have to compile your own with support for MD and RAID0 turned on. I
 don't think there is a menu that configures the whole thing for you, but
 it is not difficult to do it by hand. Basically, you do this:

[...]


Regards,

Ulisses
- -
Computers are useless. They can only give answers.Pablo Picasso

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: latin1
Comment: PGP public key avaliable at http://www.rediris.es/cert/keyserver

iQB1AwUBNTRl+Q/N+5+NQ63pAQHBpgMAmeB0DVGhuy/zgocr+2vm1CB24xMV5+Z4
qp5V84hE2sMqt1aHiVh0v8JB8MPKwS8tV39crezvNXGlOKbHzzwpI+fDkOK95nMq
G6e/fdF86wIibZG3Frb06T6n9JyeH5jA
=f+1Z
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ppp Questions.

1998-04-15 Thread Nils Rennebarth
On Tue, Apr 14, 1998 at 07:52:25PM -0500, Petra Kevin J Poorman wrote:
 I knew about the IP stuff what I was wondering was wether or not this
 stuff: Apr 13 19:23:00 petra pppd[11431]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x1
 magic=0x7df7] was healthy
It's normal. These are packages that the ppp demons on both sides send when
the line is otherwise idle, to ensure that the link is still up. There is a
ppp option to terminate a session if too many of these echo requests go
unanswered.

Just switch debug off to get rid of these messages.

Nils

--
*-*
| Quotes from the net:  L Linus Torvalds, W Winfried Truemper   |
| Lthis is the special easter release of linux, more mundanely called 1.3.84 |
| WUmh, oh. What do you mean by special easter release?. Will it quit  |
* Wworking today and rise on easter? *


pgp9V8fvV2Fmm.pgp
Description: PGP signature


equal interrupts

1998-04-15 Thread Bernd Kummer
hi everybody,

i have a problem with my pci-bios : it assigns the same interrupt on two
different devices (SCSI and USB) as you can see in the attachment.

i would not really care about it if i had no problems with recording
cd's. my question is if this is normal or an error of the bios ??

Very much thanks !!! Bye bye


PCI device listing.
Bus No. Device No. Func No. Vendor ID   Device ID   Device Class   IRQ
--
   07 280867112 Serial Bus Controller   11
   0   17 0102B051B Display Controller  10
   0   19 090046178 Mass Storage Controller 11
   0   20 010B79001 Network Controller   9





cdrecord

1998-04-15 Thread Bernd Kummer
hi,

does anybody know if there is another cd recording program for linux
than cdrecord ???


bye bye !!





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ppp Questions.

1998-04-15 Thread Marcus . Brinkmann
On Tue, Apr 14, 1998 at 07:52:25PM -0500, Petra Kevin J Poorman wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 
 On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
 
  On Mon, Apr 13, 1998 at 08:23:36PM -0500, Petra Kevin J Poorman wrote:
   -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
   
   Hi,
   
   I installed pppconfig, configured my ppp setup for my ISP and got pon to
   work, VS, my old one line script that was broken by the ppp. Now when i
   dial my isp I find these messages in my syslog:
   Apr 13 19:22:30 petra pppd[11431]: local  IP address 209.113.53.194
   Apr 13 19:22:30 petra pppd[11431]: remote IP address 209.113.55.254
   Apr 13 19:23:00 petra pppd[11431]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x1 magic=0x7df7]
   Apr 13 19:23:00 petra pppd[11431]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x1 magic=0x0]
   Apr 13 19:23:30 petra pppd[11431]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x2 magic=0x7df7]
   Apr 13 19:23:30 petra pppd[11431]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x2 magic=0x0]
   
   Could anyone tell me what this means?...
  
  This means that you have the official IP adress 209.113.53.194. At this
  time, people could try to telnet your machine from anywhere in the internet.
  This adress is a dynamically assigned valid IP adress. So, if you have
  apache web server installed, people could even point netscape at
  http://209.113.53.194, and see your locally installed web pages ;)
  
  You connected to host 209.113.55.254, which is the server that you diald-in.
  
 
 I knew about the IP stuff what I was wondering was wether or not this
 stuff: Apr 13 19:23:00 petra pppd[11431]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x1
 magic=0x7df7] was healthy, and by the way it INVAIDS my syslog, but
 flooding it, I couldn't see how it could be heathly... so I thought I
 would ask about how to fix it, meaning how to get pppd to stop flooding
 my syslog, with information I can't make heads or tails of Guess I
 shouldn't e-mail past midnight, I lose mental corodonation, and prowess.
 
  The next four lines just give information about transferred packages.
 

ok

 What do you mean by transferd packages?

This are logs about ip packets send. They tell you that pppd is still up and 
running ;)
You can switch it off by removing the debug option.
Where this is st depends on your version of pppd. In newer version
the file is /etc/ppp/peers/provider or the appropriate file in
the same directory. In older version you can try grep option /etc/ppp/*
to check what files have this option set.

Sorry for this strange reply, I´m writing over a telnet from windows
in vi :-/

 
  
   How to fix it?... also is there a



  Nothing wrong here. I think you can remove debug from your ppp config
  file. I don't know how much less verbose ppp would get then...
 
 Ah, so thats what it is... Debug information, in what config file would I
 find the debug line in order to remove it?
 
  
   way to get ppp to tell me how fast it has conected to my ISP at?...
  
  Sorry, don't remember. Probably I never knew ;)
 
 Well another kind Debian Developer (Thanks John) said this:
 
 Add a REPORT string to /etc/chatscripts/provider, like this:
 
 REPORT CONNECT
 
 And tell chat where to put the report string by giving it the '-r' option
 in /etc/ppp/peers/provider, like this:
 
 connect /usr/sbin/chat -v -r /etc/ppp/report -f
 /etc/chatscripts/provider
 Now just read /etc/ppp/report to see everything that the modem reported
 when it connected.

Thank you for this useful information!
 
 
 - -K
 
 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: 2.6.3a
 Charset: noconv
 
 iQB1AwUBNTQEzxsA5GylAiwdAQHUXQL+LWopAFjNomJ/noAAXZ7TZSaRR0WSmN4w
 EyKBD7K4PlqjNc+pQAlgc5UosApad1RkbDRhEAsTCf3BPn+IG9dt0H8taDZhwuKh
 1k7NcuNxd621ktu4ZaJv/D8ePyTaBnHr
 =IBIS
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-- 
Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.Debian GNU/Linuxfinger brinkmd@ 
Marcus Brinkmann   http://www.debian.orgmaster.debian.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]for public  PGP Key
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/   PGP Key ID 36E7CD09


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


THANKS: Re: How much HD is necessary to mirror Debian x86?

1998-04-15 Thread Ulisses Alonso Camaro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Hi all again!

Thanks to Nathan and Santiago!

On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Nathan E Norman wrote:

 On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Ulisses Alonso Camaro wrote:
 
 : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 : 
 : Hi all!
 : 
 : I want to download the entire Debian hamm distribution _for Intel only_
 : (just binary-i386, isn't it?)
 
 No, you need binary-all also.
 

I thought to download the files not the link, so the files will
be downloaded in binary-i386

I'll use mirror instead

 : How much HD is necessary?
 
 (I'm assuming you want contrib and non-free also)
 
 kepler:/a/ftp/linux/debian/hamm $ du -s --bytes \
  {main,contrib,non-free}/binary-{i386,all} | \
  awk 'total = total + $1; END {print total}'


That's a really nice pipe

Regards,

Ulisses
- -
Computers are useless. They can only give answers.Pablo Picasso


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: latin1
Comment: PGP public key avaliable at http://www.rediris.es/cert/keyserver

iQB1AwUBNTRvlA/N+5+NQ63pAQHW9wL9GzomPg6qu24inlqUReKMI5jaumpS3Ok+
37NHpQO0V1O2p3NIOkDT23vsvMCl9yILXCR1dIpjctFTORh3N/37XicDnsJrUawu
QFN9kp23u9DiHPh9nRndS0mUd/y0BXta
=CDKH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


visual-tcl

1998-04-15 Thread Bernd Kummer
hello,

i wrote a little tcl-program with visual-tcl.
now i want a message to appear when a ping fails to another computer.

e.g :if expr `ping earth|pingOk` \ 1 then
  (set a variable or do something like that)
  fi

pingOk is a little filter-prog that checks if the Ping-String is ok and
returns 1 or 0

this if statement should be running the whole time. how can i do this

much thanks !! bye bye



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: equal interrupts

1998-04-15 Thread Graham Lillico +44 1785 248131
 hi everybody,
 
 i have a problem with my pci-bios : it assigns the same interrupt on two
 different devices (SCSI and USB) as you can see in the attachment.
 
 i would not really care about it if i had no problems with recording
 cd's. my question is if this is normal or an error of the bios ??

I had this problem with my Abit-lx6 motherboard when I got it, I even resorted
to emailing abit tech support but to no avail, so I tried moving the scsi card
to another slot and 'hey presto' they now use different irq's.  Abit did reply
and said that the USB controller shares an irq with one of the pci slots, in my
case it was the shared pci/isa slot.

Hope this helps

Graham

 Very much thanks !!! Bye bye
 
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


loadlin

1998-04-15 Thread FRANCK . F . L . LEGALL
hye,

I'm regarding using loadlin to boot linux from dos.
I have got a computer at work with dos/win3.11 installed on it.
I am not allowed to format or partition harddisk.
I want to run debian on it.

The computer has 16 Mb RAM, I won't use swap memory (I know, it's a shame!!!)

Can I install all of the debian stuff in one dos directory and run
debian with loadlin ?
What does it do if I install Debian, by selecting 'mount a previously
initialised
partition' then install when this partition is my dos primary partition ?


Please, don't tell me to buy another hardisk...

Thanks a lot
Franck


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Another Debian 2.0 Question - GMT

1998-04-15 Thread Oliver Elphick
Carroll Kong wrote:
   Okay... this is getting semi-annoying, I do not know why my clock
  automagically changes back about 4 hours behind.. maybe 5.  My local clock i
  s
  fine, it worked fine in Debian 1.3R6, but after installing Debian 2.0
  (upgrading), it changed into some odd time.  I think it has something to do 
  with
  /usr/lib/zoneinfo/localtime but it is a weird binary?  Can I turn my clo
  ck
  back to Eastern Standard Time?  Or does anyone know why it is doing this?  D
  oes
  hwclock -a $GMT have anything to do with it (this is in my /etc/init.d/boot)
  .

Use tzconfig to set your timezone. 

Then set your clock right with date.

Finally, use hwclock --hctosys --utc to set your hardware clock to the
current Universal time.

-- 
Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isle of Wight  http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver

PGP key from public servers; key ID 32B8FAA1

 
Come to me, all you who labour and are heavily laden, and I will
give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me; for I am
meek and lowly in heart, and you shall find rest for your souls.
For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.(Matthew 11: 28-30)



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


why debian?

1998-04-15 Thread Chris de Weth
Hi!

I was just wondering if anyone can tell me why so much people use Red 
Hat linux? To me it seems that they have a far greater community to 
support others questions.
I'm thinking of going to use Linux at work, so security is quite
important. From a friend I just got this list address, and I don't know 
where to ask this question to Red Hat users. Maybe someone can tell me 
what distribution is better?


__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: New drive---lilo warning

1998-04-15 Thread tko
Mark Phillips writes:
 
 
 Hi,
 
 I have just installed a third IDE hard drive (my board supports up to 4). 
 I have configured the BIOS.  Now I want to use lilo to make it possible to
 boot from it (it currently has DOS on it), but when I try, it comes up
 with: 
 
 # lilo
 Added linux *
 Added dos
 ide: probable bad entry for /dev/hdc
 ide: to fix it, run:  /usr/src/linux/scripts/MAKEDEV.ide
 Warning: BIOS drive 0x82 may not be accessible
 ide: probable bad entry for /dev/hdc
 ide: to fix it, run:  /usr/src/linux/scripts/MAKEDEV.ide
 Warning: BIOS drive 0x82 may not be accessible
 Added dad
 
 I don't know whether to believe its explanation.  I suspect something else
 might be wrong.  Any ideas?

The answer comes straight out of the LILO manual (/usr/doc/lilo/manual*)


More than two disks
- - - - - - - - - -

On systems with more than two disks, typically only the first two can be
accessed. The configuration choices are therefore the same as with two
disks.

When attempting to access one of the extra disks, LILO displays a warning
message ( Warning: BIOS drive 0xnumber may not be accessible ) but does
not abort. This is done in order to allow the lucky few whose BIOS (or
controller-BIOS) does support more than two drives to make use of this
feature. By all others, this warning should be considered a fatal error.

Note that the two disks restriction is only imposed by the BIOS. Linux
normally has no problems using all disks once it is booted.

=
In a nutshell, since your BIOS supports 4 drives, ignore the warnings.

-- 
-= Sent by Debian 1.3 Linux =-
Thomas Kocourek  KD4CIK 
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@westgac3.dragon.com Remove @_@ for correct Email address
--... ...-- ...  -.. .  -.- -.. - -.-. .. -.-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Debian 2.0

1998-04-15 Thread Santiago Vila Doncel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Carroll Kong wrote:

 [...]
 Although it still says Debian 1.3 on the outside...once again, no big
 deal to fix.  /etc/issue and /etc/issue.net, right? 

Yes, but these files are conffiles.

dpkg should have asked you about keeping them or replacing by the new
version. Just say Yes and you will see Debian 2.0 (frozen).

[ I will remove the frozen thing before the release ]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1

iQCVAgUBNTSYHCqK7IlOjMLFAQGclgP+KOmeUI65/1bHiHTgok8nLUKYfzt0uZEG
fQJ0mUwKzFsLK6PDFOOnfrwnTNk87QKICLbkSiI37CNFxswYl+op7O3j8Ey5Aqp7
hyAiw5WtNXXXJumdc2J7fOS3SAvFU6V+nzO54kqf8XDYjouNAP2gjlzra9eEAGH0
Sa+R5gijIek=
=cbzK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: procmail question

1998-04-15 Thread Santiago Vila Doncel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Vaclav Hula wrote:

 I just set-up my .procmailrc (Many thanks to Oliver Elphick). But I
 have big mailbox (/var/spool/mail/) I want to process w. procmail. Can
 anybody tell me how?

What you need is probably:

cat mbox | formail -s procmail

[ I think I will add this to the QuickStart file in hamm ].

Thanks.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1

iQCVAgUBNTSZQCqK7IlOjMLFAQEZ9AQAjjYFIOKLOxRaxQ3b5SyluDNi+8SYQRRZ
TGBhUaxVyv+eNqLIVE+Y5aSOk82G891YJaCBUadQQjspqmes7wtn7X5UtEuBHRik
UrJSbvgSzoxZaJvvhUvlg3EZydnz9lnqIpT1PVpsMuoRjVxfEK773imvL/Nc/WQb
ez1pj2fZEjc=
=Xe2E
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: why debian?

1998-04-15 Thread Ian Stuart
Chris de Weth wrote:
 
 Hi!
 
 I was just wondering if anyone can tell me why so much people use Red
 Hat linux? 
As a newbie to this arena, my impression is that RedHat has a better
public profile.

As we all know, public profiles  reality often differ...

 I'm thinking of going to use Linux at work, so security is quite
 important. From a friend I just got this list address, and I don't know
 where to ask this question to Red Hat users. Maybe someone can tell me
 what distribution is better?
From my own experience (a portable using a PCMCIA network adapter),

RedHat is easier to install initially (it's only 2 floppies as opposed
to Debians 6+), however the updating system in debian (dselect) is _far_
superior..

-- 
Ian Stuart
Medicine  Veterinary Medicine Computing Support
The University of Edinburgh


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: why debian?

1998-04-15 Thread Maarten Bezemer


On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Ian Stuart wrote:

  I was just wondering if anyone can tell me why so much people use Red
  Hat linux? 
 As a newbie to this arena, my impression is that RedHat has a better
 public profile.
 
 As we all know, public profiles  reality often differ...
 
[snip]
 RedHat is easier to install initially (it's only 2 floppies as opposed
 to Debians 6+), however the updating system in debian (dselect) is _far_
 superior..

I installed Debian 1.3.1 even without any floppy (one actually, the boot
disk created after the install to boot the new system)
Just booted from CD and all went quite easy. If your system didn't support
IDE/ATAPI-CDROM boot, you only need the first (rescue) floppy, the drivers
disk is on the CD.
Someone told me there are far more rpm-packages available, and other
distributions also use rpm. What's true about that?

Greetings,
 Maarten Bezemer



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Where did my init.d/boot go?

1998-04-15 Thread Mirek Kwasniak
On Wed, Apr 15, 1998 at 05:46:07AM +0200, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
(...)
  
  Your install is broken by buggy grep 2.1-6.
  I got the same result but I upgrade a copy of my system :)
  Get grep 2.1-7 and maybe reinstall all packages by hand (whith: dpkg -i).
 
 No, these are two different problems. grep_2.1-6 is severely broken and
 should be replaced by a newer version. The boot.OLD file is not a bug or
 an error, it is intended behaviour. The /etc/init.d/boot script has bee
 split up into several scripts. Take a look in /etc/rcS.d/ to see what it
 run in which order ar boot time.

Yes, I know that /etc/init.d/boot has been split. Upgrading init files (and
all others) was broken because grep_2.1-6 was installed and upgrade to
grep_2.1-7 don't solve problems with broken system without reinstall all of
broken packages :(

 
 If your sysvinit is really broken, you can boot Linux directly into bash.
 At the LILO boot prompt, type
 
 linux init=/bin/bash
 
 This will load bash instead of init, so you get a root shell with no
 questions asked.
 

Thanks for hint :)

Mirek


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: installation

1998-04-15 Thread Maarten Bezemer


On Mon, 13 Apr 1998, Peter Luongo wrote:

 i am trying to install Debian 1.3 and am not getting very far.  instead
 of loading and decompressing linux first, the rescue disk is trying to
 load root.bin, and failing each time.  it then just tells me that the
 boot failed and to insert a new disk.  I thought it might just be a
 problem involving the reading of the floppy, but I have tried to boot
 with four different disks, with the same result each time.  any
 suggestions would be appreciated.
 -pete
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

this seems like your rescue disk wasn't written correctly. Try downloading
and rawriting it again. It could also mean you've not enough memory or you
have a virus. What kind of computer is it?

Good luck!

Maarten Bezemer



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Mirror

1998-04-15 Thread John Boggon
How can I get mirror to leave the debian/contrib and debian/non-free
directories but still retrieve the hamm | slink/contrib, hamm |
slink/non-free directories ?
If I add the lines
exclude_patt+|contrib/
exlude_patt+|non-free/
to my mirror script it will not retrieve any of the contrib directories.

John



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


A few things about Debian Hamm

1998-04-15 Thread Chris

Can anybody tell me when hamm is expected to go stable?

Also, I am in the middle of installing a hamm system onto a clean drive,
however it seems alot of old packages are missing (ie. pine, etc).  Will
these be included when it goes stable?

Another thing - is there any plans for debianizing the enlightenment
window manager?

Thanks alot,

chris

BTW.  I noticed that the rescue target doesn't work on the new rescue
  disk, nor does the base installation install any kernel modules...


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: RAID installation

1998-04-15 Thread Martin Schulze
On Thu, Apr 09, 1998 at 12:53:55PM +0200, Ulisses Alonso Camaro wrote:

 I'm planning to install hamm on a system with raid0(stripping), but seems
 to me that raidtools is not included in the base system so a raid
 installation cann't be done through the installation method, so I suposse
 the way to do this is to install the base system in a non-raid partition
 and move it over the raid partitions after the installation completes.

Hmm, you're correct, the bootdisks lack real RAID support.  I've
brought this up on the appropriate auditorium now.  I don't think
it will be changed for 2.0 but might be for 2.1.

Yes, your way is correct.  Please notice that you need take special
attention if your root file system should be a RAID.  Most of all
other directories doesn't make problems.

If you plan rootfs-raid, contact me again and I'll give you my
setup.

Regards,

Joey

-- 
  / Martin Schulze  *  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  *  26129 Oldenburg /
 / http://home.pages.de/~joey/
/ Install joe (Joey's Own Editor) correct: Joe's Own Editor /


pgpjofvfe7ztX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Upgrading to hamm

1998-04-15 Thread Carroll Kong
I was in the same position as you as of yesterday.  I upgraded,
although, i had to use the upgrade script three times (well just to make sure, I
only needed to do it twice) for dependencies.  However, I could not figure out
how to reexecute the script installation after the first time, so I redownloaded
all the files again!  No big deal to me since i have a good inet connect, anyone
know how do resolve this?  (can i just goto /var/lib/dpkg/methods/ftp/base/ and
install all the .debs manually?!?  How can i get the script to auto continue and
do it again without redownloading everything?!?)
Ok... after that, I rebooted.  I did the /var/wtmp and utmp fix which is
told in the autoup.sh.  (or else who and last do not work... and they really
don't unless you do it. :)  )  Then.. the dreaded hamm upgrade! I advise not
doing this while you are in X (the hamm upgrade).  Use dselect to get the hamm
package, (I had a cd of the packages so I escaped unscathed), ftp dselect failed
for me... but someone told me how to do it.  Try this.

Use dists/frozen/main dists/frozen/contrib dists/frozen/non-free.  It
works fine for me. 

This is quoted from Bob who assisted me.  I did not try it, but it should work.
ftp.debian.org has the newest packages btw.  

My grep was broken on the CD, however, the new package fixes it.  My sendmail
broke too after the hamm packages upgrade, I got sendmail.8.8.8-14.deb and had
to install it twice.  (weird eh?)  Then it finally went.  I had to do some funky
things with the sendmail.mf and .cf and what not to get it working... although
it works now.  (heheh i should get the crab book).  Aside from that, not too
painful, but reconfiguring afterstep 1.4 took a bit of time. Generally took 8
hours for me to fully reconfigure and feel happy about the system again.  (it
takes me a while for these things).

Hope this helps.  (no unstablility yet...)

Carroll Kong

On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Chris wrote:

 
 Hi,
 
 I am currently running a debian bo system, and I am considering upgrading
 (or more to the point - re-installing) to a hamm system.
 
 I am, however, conserned about stablility...
 
 Does anyone know of any major problems with a hamm system?
 
 Chris


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: A few things about Debian Hamm

1998-04-15 Thread Santiago Vila Doncel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Chris wrote:

 Can anybody tell me when hamm is expected to go stable?
 
 Also, I am in the middle of installing a hamm system onto a clean drive,
 however it seems alot of old packages are missing (ie. pine, etc).  Will
 these be included when it goes stable?

pine is distributed in source-only form (but with Debian patches, 
so that you may create .deb packages for it). You will have to compile
it yourself. Get the .dsc, .orig.tar.gz and .diff.gz files from the
FTP archives (hamm/non-free/source/mail) and do the following:

dpkg-source -x pine_3.96L-7.dsc
cd pine-3.96L
debian/rules binary (under root)

That's all. Then you can dpkg -i pine.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1

iQCVAgUBNTSreyqK7IlOjMLFAQFPnQP/cJ3QjjhvfEHrXENW6zQOxv+9MgQ8n1vV
I8YwM3HXHvtM1ER4F5fGoaw8Wky42hlZ6N4ceTn1vaf9bMBGeyYt5GVw3qC5KJVZ
hTdLi/OzC/2WK14Mo5cZC7uBtDvuXMJ0zowcCf01wfDd9ZfI2kst8dj8l8oXB6GK
B7fWVTagQ1s=
=QMnw
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: A few things about Debian Hamm

1998-04-15 Thread Stephen Carpenter
Chris wrote:

 Can anybody tell me when hamm is expected to go stable?

I forget whether a date is set or not...but my system crashed due to major
hardware failure (I am
respondign from work now)...hamm seems rather stable

 Also, I am in the middle of installing a hamm system onto a clean drive,
 however it seems alot of old packages are missing (ie. pine, etc).  Will
 these be included when it goes stable?

I have been dowloading files at work and burning CDs...
Pine is in non-free ...I noticed some things missing too...
I saw Apache (web server) listed in Packages  but...the deb file
was not there...then again...I bvurened my hamm CD before the
code freeze...
just remember to check out non-free and all the toher places
you never know where a package could end up


 Another thing - is there any plans for debianizing the enlightenment
 window manager?

hmm I think I looked at Enlightenment...and I think it looked coolthat was a
while ago tho...

 Thanks alot,

 chris

 BTW.  I noticed that the rescue target doesn't work on the new rescue
   disk, nor does the base installation install any kernel modules...

 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
-=Signature has been removed because it made an unfair comparison between NT 4
and Linux =-
replacement: (ok I admit...I am bored..its a slow day at work)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$fortune -o
Anything more than 3 shakes is for fun.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


KDE Beta-3

1998-04-15 Thread Graham Lillico +44 1785 248131
Hi all,

I am trying to install KDE beta-3, I have downloaded the .deb files and I am
trying to install them but it is saying that I need libgif2 or greater, Does
anyone know where I can get this from as I can't find it anywhere?  And is it
avaliable in .deb format?

Also if you install a .tgz format program (i.e. source compile and install) how
do you tell dpkg that the required files are installed, as doesn't it look at
its package database to se if the .deb package it needs is installed?

Regards 

Graham


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: A few things about Debian Hamm

1998-04-15 Thread Stephen Carpenter
I don't believe that is true
I am using pine under hamm obn my pc here at work
well..I have it installed...due to problems with firewall issues and DHCP
I can't seem to get mail working but...
I downloaded pine as a binary for hamm
I saw the deb of hamm in hamm/non-free/binary-i386/mail
-Steve

Santiago Vila Doncel wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

 On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Chris wrote:

  Can anybody tell me when hamm is expected to go stable?
 
  Also, I am in the middle of installing a hamm system onto a clean drive,
  however it seems alot of old packages are missing (ie. pine, etc).  Will
  these be included when it goes stable?

 pine is distributed in source-only form (but with Debian patches,
 so that you may create .deb packages for it). You will have to compile
 it yourself. Get the .dsc, .orig.tar.gz and .diff.gz files from the
 FTP archives (hamm/non-free/source/mail) and do the following:

 dpkg-source -x pine_3.96L-7.dsc
 cd pine-3.96L
 debian/rules binary (under root)

 That's all. Then you can dpkg -i pine.deb

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: 2.6.3ia
 Charset: latin1

 iQCVAgUBNTSreyqK7IlOjMLFAQFPnQP/cJ3QjjhvfEHrXENW6zQOxv+9MgQ8n1vV
 I8YwM3HXHvtM1ER4F5fGoaw8Wky42hlZ6N4ceTn1vaf9bMBGeyYt5GVw3qC5KJVZ
 hTdLi/OzC/2WK14Mo5cZC7uBtDvuXMJ0zowcCf01wfDd9ZfI2kst8dj8l8oXB6GK
 B7fWVTagQ1s=
 =QMnw
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
-=Signature has been removed because it made an unfair comparison between NT 4
and Linux =-
replacement: (ok I admit...I am bored..its a slow day at work)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$fortune -o
Anything more than 3 shakes is for fun.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: why debian?

1998-04-15 Thread Carroll Kong
There is no better distribution.  It is a matter of taste and style.
I like slackware, but it has no package system.  :)  I find Debian to be a nice
combination in between.  It has a good package system and does not seem to have
as many bugs as redhat.  Although I could be wrong since red hat has a lot of
patches.  Try them yourself and get a feel for it.


Carroll Kong

On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Chris de Weth wrote:

 Hi!
 
 I was just wondering if anyone can tell me why so much people use Red 
 Hat linux? To me it seems that they have a far greater community to 
 support others questions.
 I'm thinking of going to use Linux at work, so security is quite
 important. From a friend I just got this list address, and I don't know 
 where to ask this question to Red Hat users. Maybe someone can tell me 
 what distribution is better?
 
 
 __
 Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
 
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


network startup script

1998-04-15 Thread Hamish Moffatt
Can anyone suggest why this script doesn't seem to work on 2.1.90?
It's my /etc/init.d/network. I added the netmask on the route line
for lo because it seemed to help, but I still get some other errors,
and ifconfig seems to hang.

#!/bin/sh
ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
route add -net 127.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0

IPADDR=203.14.18.11
NETMASK=255.255.255.128
NETWORK=203.14.18.0
BROADCAST=203.14.18.127
GATEWAY=203.14.18.1

ifconfig eth0 ${IPADDR} netmask ${NETMASK} broadcast ${BROADCAST}
route add -net ${NETWORK}
route add default gw ${GATEWAY} metric 1


This script seems to need changing every few new kernels. I wish
they would make up their mind.

Hamish


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: KDE Beta-3

1998-04-15 Thread Graham Pople
Hi all,

I am trying to install KDE beta-3, I have downloaded the .deb files and I am
trying to install them but it is saying that I need libgif2 or greater, Does
anyone know where I can get this from as I can't find it anywhere?  And is it
avaliable in .deb format?

Providing you have installed KDEsupport, which provides libgif2, you
don't need libgif 2. As it says in the KDE FAQ, just type 
dpkg -i --force-depends name-of-file.deb
and it will ignore all dependencies for that package. 

Also if you install a .tgz format program (i.e. source compile and install) how
do you tell dpkg that the required files are installed, as doesn't it look at
its package database to se if the .deb package it needs is installed?

Regards 

Graham


Again, just use force-depends to overide dependencies, and hopefully it
should work. Incidentally, I think I remember you when I was trying to
get KDE beta 3 to work myself - if it was you, then thanks, as I
eventually got it up and running!

Graham Pople ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
SNES emulators at Emulation One (http://www.jalna.demon.co.uk/index.htm)
All emulators at E1 Newsletter (http://www.jalna.demon.co.uk/e1news.htm)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


kernels

1998-04-15 Thread Hamish Moffatt
Can anyone suggest an easy way to ensure that I never download a debian
kernel package where I already have a custom kernel installed? dpkg/apt/dselect
continually replace my kernel-package-2.0.33 with the standard one,
which doesn't suite my hardware at all of course (and causes random reboots
during startup in fact, as some kernels do --- bzImage problem I think).

I guess I can always build mine with --revision 9 or something.
Is there an easier way? Is there an easy way to get dpkg or apt
to set packages to hold from the command line?


thanks,
Hamish


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


email sendmail problems?

1998-04-15 Thread Carroll Kong
For odd reasons, I cannot send email to one user on my college network.
Pine immediately says, blahblah username not found.  Not sending.  I thought it
is supposed to send it with sendmail?!?!  Have I configured sendmail improperly?


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: why debian?

1998-04-15 Thread Graham Pople
   There is no better distribution.  It is a matter of taste and style.
I like slackware, but it has no package system.  :)  I find Debian to be a nice
combination in between.  It has a good package system and does not seem to have
as many bugs as redhat.  Although I could be wrong since red hat has a lot of
patches.  Try them yourself and get a feel for it.


Carroll Kong

On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Chris de Weth wrote:

 Hi!
 
 I was just wondering if anyone can tell me why so much people use Red 
 Hat linux? To me it seems that they have a far greater community to 
 support others questions.
 I'm thinking of going to use Linux at work, so security is quite
 important. From a friend I just got this list address, and I don't know 
 where to ask this question to Red Hat users. Maybe someone can tell me 
 what distribution is better?
 
 
Well, security is definitely prioritised a lot with Debian - one of the
first questions it asks you is whether you want to install shadow
passwords. I haven't had any real problems with my Debian 1.3 then 2.0
frozen systems - with that superb package system it all works fine.
However, Red Hat is supposedly a lot easier to use.

Graham Pople ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
SNES emulators at Emulation One (http://www.jalna.demon.co.uk/index.htm)
All emulators at E1 Newsletter (http://www.jalna.demon.co.uk/e1news.htm)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: why debian?

1998-04-15 Thread Ossama Othman
Hi,

 combination in between.  It has a good package system and does not seem to 
 have
 as many bugs as redhat.  Although I could be wrong since red hat has a lot of
 patches.  Try them yourself and get a feel for it.

This could be interpreted several ways.  Either RedHat is quicker at
getting bugs fixed, RedHat has more bugs, Debian is slower at getting bugs
repaired or Debian has less bugs.  I tend to think that Debian is a
technically superior distribution, i.e. in the way it is put together and
managed, perhaps resulting in less bugs.  I've spoken to a colleague who
uses RedHat 5.0. He told me the initial release was _very_ buggy.  Hence,
RedHat would almost have to put out many patches.  Don't get me wrong, I
believe RedHat to be a fine distribution, too.  I just prefer Debian.

-Ossama


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: kernels

1998-04-15 Thread Ossama Othman
Hi,

 Can anyone suggest an easy way to ensure that I never download a debian
 kernel package where I already have a custom kernel installed? 
 dpkg/apt/dselect
 continually replace my kernel-package-2.0.33 with the standard one,
 which doesn't suite my hardware at all of course (and causes random reboots
 during startup in fact, as some kernels do --- bzImage problem I think).

Just place your kernel-image package on hold in dselect, i.e. highlight
the kernel-image package in dselect and press the = button.  That will
prevent your kernel-image from being upgraded.  I've done the same.

-Ossama



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-I- Re: email sendmail problems?

1998-04-15 Thread Carroll Kong
Ignore this.. i think i may have fixed it.  :(  Sorry about the flood of
'newbie' questions.  Heheeh :)


Carroll Kong

On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Carroll Kong wrote:

   For odd reasons, I cannot send email to one user on my college network.
 Pine immediately says, blahblah username not found.  Not sending.  I thought 
 it
 is supposed to send it with sendmail?!?!  Have I configured sendmail 
 improperly?
 
 
 Carroll Kong
 
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: KDE Beta-3

1998-04-15 Thread Graham Lillico +44 1785 248131
   trying to install KDE beta-3, I have downloaded the .deb files and I am
  trying to install them but it is saying that I need libgif2 or greater,
Does
  anyone know where I can get this from as I can't find it anywhere?  And is
it
  avaliable in .deb format?
 
KDE is sort of a non-Debian *.deb.  As I understand it the package was
made by
 the KDE folks and is still pretty broken.  I found it was interesting that
it
 installs itself into /opt rather than /usr/local or some other standard
directory.
 My solution was to kill the package and to wait until there is real Debian
support
 for it.

I ran it on my RedHat system before I upgraded my RedHat Dist and Beta-3 ran ok
not many problems at all.  I would but I don't like many of the others window
managers.   /opt is new directory in the FHS if i remember correclty, Netscape
Communicator 4 will install itself in there if if exists by default to.

Regards

Graham

 
 --
  Regards,|Debian GNU/__ o http://www.debian.org
  .   |  / /__  _  _  _  _ __  __
  Randy   | / /__  / / / \// //_// \ \/ /
  ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) |// /_/ /_/\/ /___/  /_/\_\
  |...because lockups are for convicts...
  |What is or why Linux?  Click on the below:
  http://www8.zdnet.com/pcmag/pctech/content/16/13/os1613.001.html
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Xwindows

1998-04-15 Thread Mike Holliday
Hi,
I own a Hercules Stingray 128/3D 3DFX card (pci)6 megs vidram.
and when I do xwindows, I get gigantic icons and screens.
has anyone else ran across this problem, if have please let me know how
you repaired it.

Mike Holliday


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: why debian?

1998-04-15 Thread Liran Zvibel
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Maarten Bezemer wrote:

 I installed Debian 1.3.1 even without any floppy (one actually, the boot
 disk created after the install to boot the new system)
 Just booted from CD and all went quite easy. If your system didn't support
 IDE/ATAPI-CDROM boot, you only need the first (rescue) floppy, the drivers
 disk is on the CD.
 Someone told me there are far more rpm-packages available, and other
 distributions also use rpm. What's true about that?

I use Debian, too. I like it very much. I think Red Hat has more publicity
since they can spend the money. They are a commercial company that can do
that. Debian are a bunch of volunteers that don't have a lot of money.

As for the rpm-packages - Debian can read those with the alian package.
Furthermore, Debian has twice more packages then RedHat (at least that
what the Debian peoples say...)


Liran Zvibel




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Xwindows

1998-04-15 Thread Ossama Othman
Hi,

 I own a Hercules Stingray 128/3D 3DFX card (pci)6 megs vidram.
 and when I do xwindows, I get gigantic icons and screens.
 has anyone else ran across this problem, if have please let me know how
 you repaired it.

I own an Intergraph Intense 3D Voodoo which has the same Voodoo Rush
chipset your card has and I have had no problems.  Are you using the
latest XF86 distribution and server (XF86_SVGA)?  I am using XF86-3.3.2 on
my hamm system.  By the way, only 4MB of your RAM is useable by Linux.
The other 2MB is for textures which may be used by applications that use
Glide for Linux, for example.  I'm not sure if the Glide library with
Voodoo Rush support has been ported to Linux yet, however.

-Ossama


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: RAID installation

1998-04-15 Thread Leonardo Ruoso
I want to install Debian in a RAID 5 w/ 4 9.1GB HDs server. Are there
something that I must know?

TIA

Leonardo Ruoso


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Faster swap by using separate disk?

1998-04-15 Thread tko
Mark Phillips writes:
 
 
 I have been wondering about whether putting a swap partition on one IDE
 drive, while putting most of linux on a different IDE drive will speed up
 swap by allowing both disks to be accessed at the same time.
 
 Unfortunately I think I read somewhere that when you have a Master/Slave
 IDE pair, only one of the disks can be accessed at any one time, so that
 having the swap partition on a separate disk doesn't help.
 
 However my motherboard is capable of using 4 ide devices.  It has two
 pairs:
 
   Primary Master/Primary Slave
 and
   Secondary Master/Secondary Slave
 
 What if I put linux on one of the primary disks, and the swap partition on
 a secondary disk, will that mean both disks can be accessed at the same
 time, hence giving a swap speedup?

You need to think in terms of available bandwidth. If the swap partition is
on the same cable as the root partition, then it has to share the bandwidth
with the other partition(s). Moving the swap partition to the secondary
controller (where it is by itself), will increase available bandwidth. You can
use this trick with a CDROM drive also. The second thing that you can do is to
move up to the new ultra-DMA IDE drives. The bandwidth (bytes per second) is
much higher than the standard IDE drives and will speed up Linux as a whole.
The third thing that you can do to speed up your system is add more memory so
that you don't even need to access the swap partition. And lastly, if you are
using EDO memory SIMMs and your motherboard supports SDRAM memory, switch over
to SDRAM. You can get a large speed up doing this alone. My kernel
compile times used to be ~35 minutes. When I changed from EDO to SDRAM, the
kernel compile times dropped to 12 minutes (without any other changes).

-- 
-= Sent by Debian 1.3 Linux =-
Thomas Kocourek  KD4CIK 
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@westgac3.dragon.com Remove @_@ for correct Email address
--... ...-- ...  -.. .  -.- -.. - -.-. .. -.-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Upgrading to hamm

1998-04-15 Thread Jeff Noxon
On Wed, Apr 15, 1998 at 12:29:39AM -0700, George Bonser wrote:
 There are some rather severe problems with memory corruption.  Generally,
 you will only see them on busy systems. Other problems include memory
 leaks, filesystem problems and system hangs. There are also networking
 issues. 2.0.33 is pretty bad. It DID introduce some hardware support that
 other kernels did not have.
 
 You are better off with 2.0.32 until 2.0.34 which I hope will be out
 pretty soon. It is currently at pre7 or 8. See freshmeat for details on
 where to find it if you want to build it.

I have 2.0.33 running on an ABIT IT5H 2.0, K6-233 w/ 64 megs of RAM.
It's rock solid, but when I add another 64 megs, things start to segfault
all over the place.  Is that a symptom of this problem?  Should I switch
to 2.0.32 or 34pre?  My K6 is one of the 32M bug free ones.

I suspected the memory immediately and took it out.  But it appears to
be good stuff -- 60ns Micron EDO, just like what was already in there.
Naturally, it also passes every memory test I throw at it.

Thanks,

Jeff


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Faster swap by using separate disk?

1998-04-15 Thread E.L. Meijer \(Eric\)
Thomas Kocourek wrote:
[...]
 
 And lastly, if you are
 using EDO memory SIMMs and your motherboard supports SDRAM memory, switch over
 to SDRAM. You can get a large speed up doing this alone. My kernel
 compile times used to be ~35 minutes. When I changed from EDO to SDRAM, the
 kernel compile times dropped to 12 minutes (without any other changes).

That is impressive.  Did you install the same amount SDRAM as EDO RAM?
What type of CPU have you got?

Eric

-- 
 E.L. Meijer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])  | tel. office +31 40 2472189
 Eindhoven Univ. of Technology | tel. lab.   +31 40 2475032
 Lab. for Catalysis and Inorg. Chem. (TAK) | tel. fax+31 40 2455054


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Upgrading to hamm

1998-04-15 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, George Bonser wrote:

 
 
 On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Chris wrote:
 
  I am, however, conserned about stablility...
  
  Does anyone know of any major problems with a hamm system?
  
  Chris
 
 Only on systems that have run 2.0.33.  All systems running 2.0.32 are
 fine.  There are none of the problems that Red Hat has been having with
 its 5.0 release.

And some 2.0.33 systems (mine at least) are quite stable with hamm.

Bob


Bob Nielsen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson, AZ  AMPRnet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stopping XDM

1998-04-15 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Shaleh wrote:

 All daemons in Debian can be stopped by calling the start-stop-daemon. 
 An easier way is to look in /etc/init.d and call its script.  for XDM it
 is /etc/init.d/xdm stop (start would restart it).

Yes, and change the line 'start-xdm' in /etc/X11/config into
'no-start-xdm' if you don't want xdm to be started at boot time. But if
you want to stop xdm, you must do this before you change this file or the
/etc/init.d/xdm script will not stop xdm.

Remco



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: A few things about Debian Hamm

1998-04-15 Thread Daniel Martin at cush
Stephen Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I don't believe that is true
 I am using pine under hamm obn my pc here at work
 well..I have it installed...due to problems with firewall issues and DHCP
 I can't seem to get mail working but...
 I downloaded pine as a binary for hamm
 I saw the deb of hamm in hamm/non-free/binary-i386/mail
 -Steve

There may have been a pine binary .deb for hamm before people got the
license figured out.  The fact is, the University of Washington
forbids distributing modified binary versions of pine.  (There was a
binary .deb in bo because the license isn't perfectly clear that
that's forbidden, but if you look for it, it's there) Yes, this is
highly annoying.  Yes, many people have tried to get them to change
it, with no success.  I know many people annoyed at pine's
non-freeness have chosen to go with mutt - you may want to look at
that.

The original post also asked about the enlightenment wm.  The list of
prospective packages
(http://www.debian.org/doc/prospective-packages.html) lists it as one
that's being worked on.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: kernels

1998-04-15 Thread Joost Kooij
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:

 Can anyone suggest an easy way to ensure that I never download a debian
 kernel package where I already have a custom kernel installed? 
 dpkg/apt/dselect
 continually replace my kernel-package-2.0.33 with the standard one,
 which doesn't suite my hardware at all of course (and causes random reboots
 during startup in fact, as some kernels do --- bzImage problem I think).
 
 I guess I can always build mine with --revision 9 or something.
 Is there an easier way? Is there an easy way to get dpkg or apt
 to set packages to hold from the command line?

I always build kernel.debs with these switches to kernel-package:

  make-kpkg --revision 3:custom.1.0 kernel_image

The --revision custom.x.y should do it already, because custom is
evaluated as a higher number than anything the kernel-image maintainer
puts in the default package.

Notice that I added an epoch (3:) to satisfy all lingering paranoia. Thi
should not be necessary under normal circumstances, but there have been
moments when the kernel-images in the distribution had an epoch (1:) too,
thus replacing any home-crafted kernel-images with a custom version
number. I assume that the kernel-image will never need an epoch of level
three (knock knock.)

Cheers,


Joost


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: network startup script

1998-04-15 Thread Scott Ellis
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:

 Can anyone suggest why this script doesn't seem to work on 2.1.90?
 It's my /etc/init.d/network. I added the netmask on the route line
 for lo because it seemed to help, but I still get some other errors,
 and ifconfig seems to hang.
 
 #!/bin/sh
 ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
 route add -net 127.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0
 
 IPADDR=203.14.18.11
 NETMASK=255.255.255.128
 NETWORK=203.14.18.0
 BROADCAST=203.14.18.127
 GATEWAY=203.14.18.1
 
 ifconfig eth0 ${IPADDR} netmask ${NETMASK} broadcast ${BROADCAST}
 route add -net ${NETWORK}
 route add default gw ${GATEWAY} metric 1

The 2.1.x series kernels automagically add the net routes by default.  If
you need to override them, you need to provide the netmask and other
information as well, it isn't extrapolated anymore.  I've edited my
/etc/init.d/network as follows (it might be good for the netconfig stuff
from hamm to do something similar):

--- snip ---
#!  /bin/sh
ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1

# 2.1.x kernels don't need this and emit harmless but annoying errors
if [ `/sbin/kernelversion` = 2.0 ] ; then
route add -net 127.0.0.0
fi

IPADDR=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=xxx.xxx.xxx.0
BROADCAST=xxx.xxx.xxx.255
GATEWAY=xxx.xxx.xxx.1
ifconfig eth0 ${IPADDR} netmask ${NETMASK} broadcast ${BROADCAST}

# 2.1.x kernels don't need this and emit harmless but annoying errors
if [ `/sbin/kernelversion` = 2.0 ] ; then
route add -net ${NETWORK}
fi

[ ${GATEWAY} ]  route add default gw ${GATEWAY} metric 1
--- snip ---

-- 
Scott K. Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gate.net/~storm/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


newbie :X Arena www brower

1998-04-15 Thread demonspawn
I have been unable to get arena www broweser working and configure X
windows to load stuff automatically?
I ran dselect ,arena is installed (dkpg -s arena).Its not on any menu on
any of the window managers(wm),In the xterm I typed arena,get message
bad command error.Days have past.Now I'm about to try to install
netscape in the next couple of hrs!

Simply I have got afterstep as the default window manager.I want fwm2
to  be it.
ran update-menus but when I was using olwvm it only has two menu
options.
Which docs will be helpful ?I can't find anything on .xsession file.I
can't read html stuff!.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Software RAID configuration in hamm install?

1998-04-15 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Ulisses Alonso Camaro wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 
 Hello Remco!
 
 On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
 
  On Wed, 8 Apr 1998, Ulisses Alonso Camaro wrote:
  
   Hi all,
   
   I'm novice to RAID, and I want to try with it. I would like to know if
   hamm provices in its installation the tools to setup a RAID0 (stripping)
   installation. Also I would like to know if the menu for installation has
   RAID0 configuration options
   
   Thanks in advance,
   
 Ulisses
   
   PD: Does debian.org ships hamm?
  
  Sorry for the late reply, I am catching up with the mailing list.
 
 Thanks for your reply! :-)
 
 Your info is great for me!
 
 ...but... you have make a mistake ;-) 
 in hamm mdutils has been replaced by raidtools

Yes, silly me. I knew that, I just didn't think of it.

Remco


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Faster swap by using separate disk?

1998-04-15 Thread David Wright
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, tko wrote:

 Mark Phillips writes:
  
  I have been wondering about whether putting a swap partition on one IDE
  drive, while putting most of linux on a different IDE drive will speed up
  swap by allowing both disks to be accessed at the same time.
  
  What if I put linux on one of the primary disks, and the swap partition on
  a secondary disk, will that mean both disks can be accessed at the same
  time, hence giving a swap speedup?
 
 You need to think in terms of available bandwidth. If the swap partition is
 on the same cable as the root partition, then it has to share the bandwidth
 with the other partition(s). Moving the swap partition to the secondary
 controller (where it is by itself), will increase available bandwidth.

Why /the/ swap partition? Put one on each disk if you want. That way, the 
system can choose which to use according to load.

See /usr/doc/HOWTO/mini/Multiple...whatsits...

Cheers,

-- 
David Wright, Open University, Earth Science Department, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA
U.K.  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  tel: +44 1908 653 739  fax: +44 1908 655 151


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: A few things about Debian Hamm

1998-04-15 Thread jdassen
On Wed, Apr 15, 1998 at 10:09:52PM +1000, Chris wrote:
 Can anybody tell me when hamm is expected to go stable?

When the're no more release critical bugs left. A list of these is posted on
debian-devel-announce with some regularity (latest:
http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-devel-announce-9804/msg2.html).
This list is derived from the list of bugs with Severity:
{critical,grave,important} as registered with the bug tracking system
(http://www.debian.org/Bugs/).

There's recently been an announcment about this:
http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-devel-9804/msg01102.html which
also explains what you can do to help.

HTH,
Ray
-- 
Tevens ben ik van mening dat Nederland overdekt dient te worden.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Faster swap by using separate disk?

1998-04-15 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Mark Phillips writes:
  
  
  I have been wondering about whether putting a swap partition on one IDE
  drive, while putting most of linux on a different IDE drive will speed up
  swap by allowing both disks to be accessed at the same time.
  
  Unfortunately I think I read somewhere that when you have a Master/Slave
  IDE pair, only one of the disks can be accessed at any one time, so that
  having the swap partition on a separate disk doesn't help.
  
  However my motherboard is capable of using 4 ide devices.  It has two
  pairs:
  
  Primary Master/Primary Slave
  and
  Secondary Master/Secondary Slave
  
  What if I put linux on one of the primary disks, and the swap partition on
  a secondary disk, will that mean both disks can be accessed at the same
  time, hence giving a swap speedup?
 
 You need to think in terms of available bandwidth. If the swap
 partition is on the same cable as the root partition, then it has to
 share the bandwidth with the other partition(s). Moving the swap
 partition to the secondary controller (where it is by itself), will
 increase available bandwidth. You can use this trick with a CDROM drive
 also.

No, there is more to it than this. If the OS send a (read, write or
whatever) command to an IDE disk, the IDE controller is 'busy' until the
command is fully completed. All this time you can not use the other disk
on the same controller at all. So, if you try to read a lot of data from
both disks simultaneously, they'll be spending a lot of time just waiting
for each other.

If you put the disks at two different controllers, you don't have this
problem.

 The second thing that you can do is to move up to the new ultra-DMA
 IDE drives. The bandwidth (bytes per second) is much higher than the
 standard IDE drives and will speed up Linux as a whole.

If you want to really speed up your hard drives, switch to multiple SCSI
drives. Period.

 The third thing that you can do to speed up your system is add more memory so
 that you don't even need to access the swap partition.

True, but I know from experience that if you add more RAM, you'll use it
all eventually. I have 48MB in my system nowadays and I still use the swap
partitions I have.

Remco


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: RAID installation

1998-04-15 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Leonardo Ruoso wrote:

 I want to install Debian in a RAID 5 w/ 4 9.1GB HDs server. Are there
 something that I must know?

Yes, you must know how to do that. :-)

Read the relevant HOWTOs and man pages. Documents you should read include 
at least:

/usr/doc/HOWTO/Multi-Disk-HOWTO.gz
/usr/doc/HOWTO/mini/Software-RAID.gz
and the man pages in the raidtools package

Remco


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: why debian?

1998-04-15 Thread Isabelle Dauthieu


On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Ian Stuart wrote:

 Chris de Weth wrote:
  I was just wondering if anyone can tell me why so much people use Red
  Hat linux? 
 As a newbie to this arena, my impression is that RedHat has a better
 public profile.
 
 As we all know, public profiles  reality often differ...

I may add that red hat CD's are easier to find than debian ones (well in
France).

  I'm thinking of going to use Linux at work, so security is quite
  important. From a friend I just got this list address, and I don't know
  where to ask this question to Red Hat users. Maybe someone can tell me
  what distribution is better?
 From my own experience (a portable using a PCMCIA network adapter),
 
 RedHat is easier to install initially (it's only 2 floppies as opposed
 to Debians 6+), however the updating system in debian (dselect) is _far_
 superior..

Just a correction : debian now only needs 1 floppy to install
if your CDrom is quite standard. If it is not the case, you will need 2
floppies (the rescue disk and the drivers disks which contain drivers for
all CDroms).

In my humble opinion, there is no great difference between installing a
debian or a red hat distribution, but upgrading a debian one is far
easier. Moreover a debian installation is able to install redhat packages,
the reverse is false.
So I would advise to use debian, and if you need something that can only
be found in redhat, you'll be able to install it without any problem.

Isabelle Perinelle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: why debian?

1998-04-15 Thread Ian Stuart
Isabelle Dauthieu wrote:
 
 On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Ian Stuart wrote:
 
   where to ask this question to Red Hat users. Maybe someone can tell me
   what distribution is better?
  From my own experience (a portable using a PCMCIA network adapter),
 
  RedHat is easier to install initially (it's only 2 floppies as opposed
  to Debians 6+), however the updating system in debian (dselect) is _far_
  superior..
 
 Just a correction : debian now only needs 1 floppy to install
 if your CDrom is quite standard. If it is not the case, you will need 2
 floppies (the rescue disk and the drivers disks which contain drivers for
 all CDroms).
I feel I must clarify my position here - I've done ally my installs from
FTP sites.

It's one of the advantages of working for an Academic site

In this situation, RedHat seems to offer an easier install...

-- 
Ian Stuart
Medicine  Veterinary Medicine Computing Support
The University of Edinburgh


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Xwindows

1998-04-15 Thread Ossama Othman
Hi Mike,

Below is the message I sent to some one else who was having problems with
his Voodoo Rush card.  I hope that it helps.

-Ossama


Forwarded message:
--
I too have a card with the Voodoo Rush chipset, an Intergraph Intense 3D
Voodoo.  The Xserver/driver that you want is in the latest XF86_SVGA
server, i.e. in XF86 3.3.2.  I'm not sure if that is available as a bo set
of packages.  If it isn't just download the Linux_ix86 XF86-3.3.2 binaries
(not the glibc ones) from any XF86 mirror.  The glibc XF86 binaries are
for Linux libc6/glibc2, not Linux libc5 which is what is normally found on
bo systems (Debian 1.3.1) such as yours.
--

The binaries you might want to get include:

XF86SVGA.tgz
XF86bin.tgz
XF86lib.tgz
XF86set.tgz
XF86cfg.tgz

and perhaps some others and some fonts.  Use your judgement and read the
binary installation instructions. :)

From what I recall, the tar files are archived relative to /usr/X11R6.

Be careful where XF86Setup and/or xf86config store the XF86Config file
after you are done configuring X.  Debian places the XF86Config file in
/etc/X11 and XF86 stores it in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/(something or other) by
default.  You can choose where to save the XF86Config file right after the
setup is done, I believe.  Also, if the setup/config programs ask you
whether or not to set a symbolic link to X, then answer no or whatever
the negative response is.  Debian's X is an suid wrapper for the X
server.  The server to use is set at the very top of /etc/X11/Xserver.

Good luck.

-Ossama


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: why debian?

1998-04-15 Thread Brian Mays
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Maarten Bezemer) wrote:

 Someone told me there are far more rpm-packages available, and other
 distributions also use rpm. What's true about that?

The core set of RPM packages, what RedHat produces, is much smaller
than Debian's main distribution.  While some other companies and groups
distribute their software in RPM form, the majority of the RPM packages
that you are hearing about are put together by RedHat users, and therefore
can be of somewhat dubious quality.  Debian has a policy document to
specify how things should be done (to avoid problems), and almost all
of Debian's packages (a few packages are looking for new maintainers)
are supported through its bug tracking system.

Brian


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: why debian?

1998-04-15 Thread Alan Su
Ian Stuart wrote (Wed, 15 Apr 1998 15:14:33 + ):
| On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Ian Stuart wrote:
| 
|  RedHat is easier to install initially (it's only 2 floppies as opposed
|  to Debians 6+), however the updating system in debian (dselect) is _far_
|  superior..
| 
|I feel I must clarify my position here - I've done ally my installs from
|FTP sites.
|
|It's one of the advantages of working for an Academic site
|
|In this situation, RedHat seems to offer an easier install...
|

I have to jump in here.  If you're installing from FTP sites, you only
need 2 floppies maximum:  the rescue/boot disk and the drivers disk
(as Isabelle noted).  I've done all my installs (granted only two =))
from an academic site, and I've never used more than two disks.
Perhaps you didn't realize that the base system could be installed
over FTP?

There may be advantages to Red Hat, but I don't think they are in the
installation process...

-alan


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Another Debian 2.0 Question - GMT

1998-04-15 Thread Bob Hilliard
Oliver Elphick olly@lfix.co.uk wrote:
 Use tzconfig to set your timezone. 
 
 Then set your clock right with date.
 
 Finally, use hwclock --hctosys --utc to set your hardware clock to the
 current Universal time.

 If you want to use local zone time instead of GMT (for instance
if your machine is dual boot with a DOS system), edit the GMT vaiable
in /etc/default/rcS.  I use local time, and my /etc/default/rcS reads:

   # Set GMT=-u if your system clock is set to GMT, and GMT= if not.
   GMT=

Bob
-- 
   _
  |_)  _  |_   Robert D. Hilliard[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  |_) (_) |_)  Palm City, FL  USAPGP Key ID: A8E40EB9


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


new ATI Mach64 boards, expert@work, 3D RAGE II+

1998-04-15 Thread Steve Izma
From a search of the list archives looking for info on
the Mach64 server, I've seen references to the fact that some
of the recent ATI boards ([EMAIL PROTECTED], 3D RAGE II+ chips) don't
work with the Mach64 server supplied with Debian 1.3.1.r6. One
reply indicated that downloading the XFree86 package numbered
*_3.3.2-3.deb (which I found in the unstable hierarchy) would fix
the problem. I started with the Mach64 server of that release and
immediately got a dependency problem: it requires libc6. Do I
understand correctly that libc6 will only work with the full
Debian 2.0 release and that I should wait until this release is
closer to stable before I update the XF86 package for these new
boards? Or is there another way of using the newer drivers
(re-compiling the source, or something) that allows me to use
these boards with 1.3.1.r6?

One problem with the 3D RAGE II+ (sorry for the shouting, but
it's the chip name given not-too-intelligently, in my mind, by
the manufacturers) seems related to video memory. Our boards have
4M, but the normal configuration setup (xf86config) comments out
the VideoRam 4096 line in the XF86Config file. The server
refuses to start with messages indicating that the board has
insufficient memory for any of the listed modes, an indication, I
assume, that the server is not probing the board properly for memory
info. When I uncomment this line, I get some results with some modes,
but multiple images on the screen, etc. This reminds me of the problems
I had about 2 years ago when updating XFree86 (to 3.1 or something)
immediately fixed these problems, rather than having to re-calculate the
figures in the mode lines.

Thanks,

--Steve Izma, Wilfrid Laurier University Press
Waterloo, Ont., Canada N2L 3C5
(519) 884-0710 ext. 6125 FAX: (519) 725-1399
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  or  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: A few things about Debian Hamm

1998-04-15 Thread Marco Anglesio


On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Stephen Carpenter wrote:

 I don't believe that is true
 I am using pine under hamm obn my pc here at work

Yes, you and me both downloaded the .deb of pine (and pico, and
pine-docs, probably). However, it's been removed from binary-i386. I'd
like to know why it's only there in source form, if anyone can answer
that.

--
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Life is like a bad margarita with good tequila,
http://squawk.klue.on.ca  I thought, as I poured whiskey onto my granola
Running Debian Linux 2.0  and faced a new day.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


re: why debian?

1998-04-15 Thread Richard E. Hawkins Esq.
As we all know, public profiles  reality often differ...

RedHat is easier to install initially (it's only 2 floppies as opposed
to Debians 6+), however the updating system in debian (dselect) is _far_
superior..

speaking of profiles  reality differing :)

You're off by 6 :)

Either boot from a cd, or if you already have a working dos partition, copy the 
install files to c:\

The only reason you'd ever need 6 is if you have a machine with no prior OS and 
no CD.  Though I usually boot off the root disk anyway, wiht just the other 
files around, but that's because I never bothered to figure out loadlin :)

rick

-- 
These opinions will not be those of ISU until it pays my retainer.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: A few things about Debian Hamm

1998-04-15 Thread Scott Ellis
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Marco Anglesio wrote:
 On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Stephen Carpenter wrote:
  I don't believe that is true
  I am using pine under hamm obn my pc here at work
 
 Yes, you and me both downloaded the .deb of pine (and pico, and
 pine-docs, probably). However, it's been removed from binary-i386. I'd
 like to know why it's only there in source form, if anyone can answer
 that.

This is becoming a FAQ.  The reason the binary pine was removed from the
archive is because the pine licence from uwash doesn't permit
redistribution of derivative works, which includes the patched version
of pine that we had been mistakenly been distributing in binary form.
Pine sources are available on the archive in debian source format.  It is
reasonably easy to compile a binary package for your own use from that,
but we can't redistribute the binarys ourselves.

Many people have been migrating to mutt, which suffers none of pine's
non-freeness and seems to have some more features (and which is more
frequently updated).

-- 
Scott K. Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gate.net/~storm/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[tcsh] disabling autologout?

1998-04-15 Thread Sudhakar Chandrasekharan
Hi,

How do I diable autologout in tcsh?  The man page tells me how I can enable
it.  The problem seems to be that even under X my DISPLAY is not being set
and tcsh running under xterm keeps logging me out after a period of
inactivity.

S.
-- 
  Whom the gods would destroy, they first teach BASIC.
Sudhakar C13n  International Websites Engineer
   http://people.netscape.com/thaths/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: why debian?

1998-04-15 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Ian Stuart wrote:

 Isabelle Dauthieu wrote:
  
  On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Ian Stuart wrote:
  
where to ask this question to Red Hat users. Maybe someone can tell me
what distribution is better?
   From my own experience (a portable using a PCMCIA network adapter),
  
   RedHat is easier to install initially (it's only 2 floppies as opposed
   to Debians 6+), however the updating system in debian (dselect) is _far_
   superior..
  
  Just a correction : debian now only needs 1 floppy to install
  if your CDrom is quite standard. If it is not the case, you will need 2
  floppies (the rescue disk and the drivers disks which contain drivers for
  all CDroms).
 I feel I must clarify my position here - I've done ally my installs from
 FTP sites.
 
 It's one of the advantages of working for an Academic site

Or of living in an area with flat-rate telephone service.

 
 In this situation, RedHat seems to offer an easier install...

On a system with DOS and a CD-ROM, you can install Debian without any
floppies.

On the other hand if you have a non-standard CD-ROM Red Hat is almost
impossible to install.  Also, unless things have changed since 4.1
(the last RH version I used) version upgrades are almost as painful as a
new installation, which is definitely not the case with Debian (even
hamm). 

Bob


Bob Nielsen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson, AZ  AMPRnet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: A few things about Debian Hamm

1998-04-15 Thread Fabien Ninoles
On Wed, Apr 15, 1998 at 10:16:26AM -0400, Daniel Martin at cush wrote:
 
 The original post also asked about the enlightenment wm.  The list of
 prospective packages
 (http://www.debian.org/doc/prospective-packages.html) lists it as one
 that's being worked on.
 

IIRC, the future maintainer post a mail about releasing Enlightment deb
at the beginning of June 1998. The current version of Enlightment aren't
ready for packaging and it there are a major release announce for the
end of May.

-- 

Fabien Ninoles  Running Debian/GNU Linux
E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
WebPage:  http://www.callisto.si.usherb.ca/~94246757
WorkStation [available when connected!]: http://nightbird.tzone.org/
RSA PGP KEY [E3723845]: 1C C1 4F A6 EE E5 4D 99  4F 80 2D 2D 1F 85 C1 70



pgp5qNq8XgdLN.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [tcsh] disabling autologout?

1998-04-15 Thread servis
On 15 Apr, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
 Hi,
 
 How do I diable autologout in tcsh?  The man page tells me how I can enable
 it.  The problem seems to be that even under X my DISPLAY is not being set
 and tcsh running under xterm keeps logging me out after a period of
 inactivity.
 
 S.

Put 

unset autologout

in your .login. 

-- 
Brian 
-- 
Mechanical Engineering  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Purdue University   http://www.ecn.purdue.edu/~servis


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: why debian?

1998-04-15 Thread Anthony Campbell
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Isabelle Dauthieu wrote:

 
 In my humble opinion, there is no great difference between installing a
 debian or a red hat distribution, but upgrading a debian one is far
 easier. Moreover a debian installation is able to install redhat packages,
 the reverse is false.

No, you can install deb packages on a RedHat system using alien; I've done it
several times.

Anthony

-- 
Anthony Campbell   Using Linux - Windows-free zone
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.achc.demon.co.uk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [tcsh] disabling autologout?

1998-04-15 Thread Keith Beattie
Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
 Hi,
 
 How do I diable autologout in tcsh?  The man page tells me how I can enable

unset autologout

 it.  The problem seems to be that even under X my DISPLAY is not being set

I don't see how these two problems could be related but...

If your DISPLAY is not being set for local xterms make sure you are
setting it using setenv instead of set in your login shell.  For
remote xterms, look into the REMOTEHOST environment variable.

PERSONAL_BIAS
  Use bash (instead of tcsh) and ssh (for connecting to remote hosts).
/PERSONAL_BIAS

HTH,
Keith


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


How can I get dselect to reinstall all installed packages?

1998-04-15 Thread Louis W. Erickson

I have a desire to get dselect to reinstall every package that I have
installed, from my known-clean CD-rom.

(I've had a security issue arise, and don't know the extent of the
possible changes.)

I don't want to have to remove every package, or to upgrade to a new
version of Debian; I'm very happy with the packages I have installed.

Is there a way to get dselect to overwrite files with the same version,
instead of skipping them?

Thanks.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


HELP!!!

1998-04-15 Thread Stephen Carpenter
A friend of mine sent out an e-mail about this last night (taking
half-assed dictation in his own way) I woul dlike to elaborate and
ask again for help...I am desparate.
Last thursday I was recompiling my kernel (2.0.29) on a hamm system
(pre-freze but this had worked b4) and I got the dreaded SIGNAL 11.
I checked out the SIG11 FAQ...and as it mentioned I ran Make again and
it went a little farther and died again..as the FAQ says then it must
be a
hardware problem.
I replaced the motherboard.
On the new motherboard I am having still major problems.
I have swapped out nearly every part, to no avail
Here are the symproms:
I can boot MS-DOS and use Loadlin to start the Debian installation
I can install with no errors (checking badblocks etc, remaking the
partition table etc - I make a 1024 MB root partition,
a 128 MB swap partition, and the rest of the 3.2 gig drive is for
/home)
When I reboot...
The BIOS does its thing and comes to
lilo after which I see loading Linux and then it pauses for up
to 20 seconds...then it gives me Error 0x20 and stops
if I again boot DOS and go into the install...
then on the seocnd VC I run e2fsck -f /dev/hda1
it comes up with major errors and deletes most of the filesystem
(I once saw nearly everything gone leaving only the
lost+found directory)
I tried this hard drive in a second computer, it installs linux fine
when that drive is moved back to this computer, it exibits
the SAME refusal to boot...however I disabled the onboard
IDE and put in a ISA IDE controler, and it worked just fine
I don't hoeveer consioder this a solution becaus eit is a NEW
motherboard which i got Saturday
Is it possible that the IDE controller is a buggy one or of a weird
chipset that will not work under linux? (installing bo so kernel 2.0.29)

the board is a BioStar 8500 TTD (it is a TX chipset)
where can I find this out? should I just return this borad and try to
get a new board
of a diffetn model and company (I already returned this board once and
got it
replaced...to no avail)
a quick response is apreciated
I have over 1000 e-maisl on my ISP...and have been without a home PC
for almost a week
This is really setting back my projects and things
if you need any more info please let me know
-Steve

--
-=Signature has been removed because it made an unfair comparison
between NT 4 and Linux =-
replacement: (ok I admit...I am bored..its a slow day at work)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$fortune -o
Anything more than 3 shakes is for fun.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  1   2   >