Re: awffull oddity

[Mark Fletcher]

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 01:34:36PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
> 
> I run my own webserver, at the address below in the sig.
> 
> And I have awffull in my crontab as 
> 40 9 * * *  awffull
> 
> And it sends me an email saying "Graph done!"
> 

Love the mail subject -- it almost sounds like a new release of Ubuntu!!!

Remboursement important...

[ÀΜelí.ƒr]

ÀΜelí.ƒr just sent you a flyer "--" using 
Smore.


To see the flyer, go to this link:


https://r.smore.com/xfcs1

To unsubscribe from emails by ÀΜelí.ƒr, go to:

https://r.smore.com/app/emails/update_subscriptions?nl=58027a33ab527c009baf65d2=mrswe2lbnywxk43foiwwm4tfnzrwqqdmnfzxi4zomrswe2lbnyxg64th=34758cfe=r7fspzbueaoo33ls

Smore, design beautiful online flyers and publish instantly.


https://r.smore.com/?utm_medium=email

Re: imapsync and Debian

[Florian Pelgrim]

Hi,

> It is a server with Squeeze and
> they do not even bother to use the LTS repositories, so more than two
> years ago that server is without security updates.
Problems I defently see to much in the web... :(

> So that is a not minor matter that we have to consider to be sure that
> this site will work with the PHP version of Jessie. I think both options
> (upgrade to Jessie from the current state, such as migrating to a new
> host with Jessie) take a lot of work, but I think the second alternative
> will be less painful and allow me to have a better control over
> migration as well as divide it into several phases. Anyway, all comments
> are welcome 
I did the upgrade from squeeze to jessie and things are made to fail.
And to fix this it will take hours.

Installing a fresh jessie and migrating first mail sounds much better.
The web application can be safely tested in a virtual environment like
vagrant and then you can decide what to do next.

I wanted to start now a rant against Cyrus but holy shit... They have
got a new website and it all looks modern... Maybe I should take a look
on it again.

Cheers
Flo



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: imapsync and Debian

[Jochen Spieker]

Daniel Bareiro:
> On 14/10/16 16:30, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> 
>>> I am planning to migrate about 200 e-mail accounts from a mail server
>>> using Dovecot to a mail server running Cyrus.
> 
>> Sounds weird! I though most people migrate _to_ Dovecot nowadays (if
>> they haven't already). Care to elaborate the reasons? I don't want to
>> discuss it, I am just curious.
> 
> […]
> 
> So that is a not minor matter that we have to consider to be sure that
> this site will work with the PHP version of Jessie. I think both options
> (upgrade to Jessie from the current state, such as migrating to a new
> host with Jessie) take a lot of work, but I think the second alternative
> will be less painful and allow me to have a better control over
> migration as well as divide it into several phases. Anyway, all comments
> are welcome :-)

Sounds reasonable, if the machine running Cyrus already exists and you
are as familiar with Cyrus as with Dovecot. Running mail and web on
different machines is probably generally a good idea anyway.

J.
-- 
I like my Toyota RAV4 because of the commanding view of the traffic
jams.
[Agree]   [Disagree]
 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: uswsusp - security hole fixed?

[deloptes]

Teemu Likonen wrote:

> I think the usual and better way is to have an unencrypted /boot and a
> single other LUKS partition which contains LVM logical volumes for
> everything else (swap, / and whatever). So swap is encrypted too. I have
> had this setup for ages on desktop and laptop and it has always worked
> (including s2disk).

+1

Re: Automated install entry menu of Debian installer does not ask pressed file path / url

[John Gathm]

Hi Stephan

having a screen missing, and an entry menu named "automated install" that
does nothing different from the regular "install" pretty looks like a bug
to me.
I'm not even talking about an incompatible preseed file.

bests

J.G.


On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Stephan Beck 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> John Gathm:
> > Hi
> >
> > just not running anything.
> > Just discovering that a behavior of previous Debian installer is either
> > broken or has been removed, and asking if others see the same behavior.
> >
> > Will report a bug.
> >
> > J.G
>
> well, I gave you the info so that you were able to see that the
> documentation is *aware of the fact* that from wheezy installer to
> jessie installer things have changed, and therefore it's probable that
> you run into issues here. You are always free to file a bug, but you can
> also check if there has been a documented change in (1), that might
> affect your installation process.
>
> Quote:
> 3.1.2. Automated installation
>
> Some changes mentioned in the previous section also imply changes
> in the support in the installer for automated installation using
> preconfiguration files. This means that if you have existing
> preconfiguration files that worked with the wheezy installer, you
> cannot expect these to work with the new installer without
> modification.
>
> The Installation Guide (https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/
> installmanual) has an updated separate appendix with extensive
> documentation on using preconfiguration.
>
> It was Section 3.1.2 of Jessie's release notes, not 3.2, as I
> erroneously stated in my previous mail.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Stephan
>
> (1) https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/News/
>
>

Re: imapsync and Debian

[Daniel Bareiro]

Hi, Jochen.

On 14/10/16 16:30, Jochen Spieker wrote:

>> I am planning to migrate about 200 e-mail accounts from a mail server
>> using Dovecot to a mail server running Cyrus.

> Sounds weird! I though most people migrate _to_ Dovecot nowadays (if
> they haven't already). Care to elaborate the reasons? I don't want to
> discuss it, I am just curious.

No problem. On the contrary. I appreciate your interest :-) It is not
about migrate to a different IMAP server but a problem of the
environment itself. It turns out that people who supposedly were dealing
with that server, abandoned it too much. It is a server with Squeeze and
they do not even bother to use the LTS repositories, so more than two
years ago that server is without security updates.

So I thought it would be less painful to do a clean installation of
Jessie and migrate everything to this new server (using Cyrus IMAP). But
beyond that, most worrying is on that server without updating for so
long is the institutional website exposed to anything.

So that is a not minor matter that we have to consider to be sure that
this site will work with the PHP version of Jessie. I think both options
(upgrade to Jessie from the current state, such as migrating to a new
host with Jessie) take a lot of work, but I think the second alternative
will be less painful and allow me to have a better control over
migration as well as divide it into several phases. Anyway, all comments
are welcome :-)

>> The idea is to migrate emails maintaining the status read, unread, etc,
>> and also synchronize Draft, Sent and Trash folders in each mailbox.
>>
>> I think the best will be make it through IMAP. This would also be
>> agnostic to the storage mechanism used (MAILDIR, system users accounts,
>> etc) in the source and destination servers. Following this course of
>> action, I found this [1] interesting article written by Falko Timme in
>> HowtoForge.

> Offlineimap can also do IMAP to IMAP synchronization. The author of
> imapsync mentions it on [4] as well.

Thank you. I'll take a look.


Kind regards,
Daniel



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Replaygain, alternatives to Easymp3gain-gtk/-qt.

[Seeker]

On 10/13/2016 10:15 PM, Seeker wrote:



To do this stuff I am normally browsing my music directories in PCManFM
and using the open with feature to open the files in Picard, mediainfo
or Ex Falso and it's just as easy to click the tools menu and open a
terminal window, so the method I settled in on for dealing with the
situation is

Open a terminal window and use aacgain to undo, then get rid of the
tags, then check the tags to make sure it only shows the file names.

aacgain -u
aacgain -s d
aacgain -s c

Then use the back button in PCManFM, right click the folder with the
files and open with Ex Falso, remove the remaining replaygain tags, then
have Ex Falso recalculate the gain and save.



I have run across some m4a files that mediainfo shows having the undo
tags for replaygain so have adjusted the command line stuff.

aacgain -u *.m*
aacgain -s d *.m*
aacgain -s c *.m*
exit

so I can just hit the up arrow 4 times and hit 'Enter' for each of
these, assuming I have not done anything else at the command line since
the last time and 'aacgain -s c *.m*' gives the expected result.

Later, Seeker

Re: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/repository-howto/repository-howto labeled as "OBSOLETE"

[Henrique de Moraes Holschuh]

On Sat, 15 Oct 2016, Richard Owlett wrote:
> What does "obsolete" actually mean in this case?

"No longer applicable", either partially, or completely.

> I find it readable, but will it mislead me?

It might.

-- 
  Henrique Holschuh

Re: [sane-devel] Ubuntu 16.04.1 and Canoscan Lide 220

[Gene Heskett]

On Saturday 15 October 2016 04:24:53 csola48 wrote:

> What should I do?
> Scanner is out of order...
>
> $ sane-find-scanner
> found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x190f [CanoScan])
> at libusb:003:002 could not open USB device 0x1d6b/0x0002 at 003:001:
> Access denied (insufficient permissions)
>   # Your USB scanner was (probably) detected. It may or may not be
> supported by SANE.

Ahh, udev strikes again, or is at the head of the list of culprits.

You'll likely need to add yourself to the scanner: line in the /etc/group 
file.  Mine is an 11x17 Brother, out thru a switch on a piece of cat5 
and I had to do that here.

> ===
> $ scanimage -L
> No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something
> different, check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and
> detected by the sane-find-scanner tool (if appropriate). Please read
> the documentation which came with this software (README, FAQ,
> manpages).
>
> Ubuntu 16.04.1 i386 desktop
> sane-utils 1.0.26-git20160712-xenial0
> sane 1.0.14-11 <= Is this necessary?

Yes, it probably indicates the patch level of *buntu applied patches.
>

> Please help me!
> Thx
> csola48


Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page 

IPsec vragen

[Paul van der Vlis]

Hoi,

Voor VPN's gebruik ik tegenwoordig OpenVPN, maar nu is er iemand die
graag IPsec wil. De VPN zou moeten lopen tussen een Debian server en een
"Watchguard Firewall XTM 330". Komt daar veel bij kijken?

Ik begrijp dat die firewall ook OpenVPN kan, al noemen ze het daar SSL.
Dus ik denk dat ik dat probeer door te drukken. Maar ik zou wel graag
van iemand willen horen of zo'n IPsec verbinding lastig is.

Hoe goed is dat IPsec eigenlijk gestandaardiseerd tegenwoordig?

Het pakket "strongswan" gebruiken in Debian?
Je hebt geloof ik ook nog "libreswan" en "openswan".
"freeswan" heb ik vroeger wel gebruikt, in Linux 2.4.

L2TP is toch ook een soort IPsec?

Kan IPsec tegenwoordig door NAT? (is hier geen probleem).

Groet,
Paul.



-- 
Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer Groningen
https://www.vandervlis.nl/

https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/repository-howto/repository-howto labeled as "OBSOLETE"

[Richard Owlett]

The title of 
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/repository-howto/repository-howto

is _Debian Repository HOWTO (Obsolete Documentation)_ .

What does "obsolete" actually mean in this case?
Anything more than it was written > 10 years ago?
I find it readable, but will it mislead me?
Is there something more current aimed at a similar audience?
TIA

Re: awffull oddity

[Gene Heskett]

On Friday 14 October 2016 20:51:43 you wrote:

> Gene
>
> Have you tried running the program manually?  And report output here
>
> Keith Bainbridge
>
> 0447667468
>
> keithrbaugro...@gmail.com
>
> Sent from my APad
>
> On 15 Oct 2016 04:35, "Gene Heskett"  wrote:
> > Greetings all;
> >
> > I run my own webserver, at the address below in the sig.
> >
> > And I have awffull in my crontab as
> > 40 9 * * *  awffull
> >
> > And it sends me an email saying "Graph done!"
> >
> > But the last time all the data in /var/www/awffull was updated was
> > on Sept 30th, 2016.  So while its not reporting any error when I run
> > an extra session from the cli, I am locked out of seeing the data
> > until the 1st of the next month.
> >
> > Nothing in the config looks like it could cause this.
> >
> > Anybody have a clue? I seem to be fresh out of clues.
> >
> > Thanks all.

Well, I am a wee bit schmardter.

I found a bash script in /etc/cron.daily named awffull.
Running that script instead of the binary in /usr/bin appeared to work so 
I edited my crontab to run this script instead.

Come time for cron to run it as me, I got an email about 4 pages long, 
the gist of which was that I didn't have enough perms to make it run, so 
I moved that entry to root's crontab.  Works if I sudo bash to run it.  
One final error:

root@coyote:/etc/awffull#  /etc/cron.daily/awffull
Running: /etc/awffull/awffull.conf file.
ERROR: Running awffull, exit status: 1

If a rerun is done when there are no new entries in the log files, so I 
tested it by accessing my web page from localhost, which would append to 
the log files.

Error gone and everythings time stamps were updated.

Did you ever hear of majestic12.co.uk? They sucked my whole web content, 
nearly 3.5G yesterday. Wannabe google? or???

Thanks Keith.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page 

Re: Automated install entry menu of Debian installer does not ask pressed file path / url

[Stephan Beck]

Hi,

John Gathm:
> Hi
> 
> just not running anything.
> Just discovering that a behavior of previous Debian installer is either
> broken or has been removed, and asking if others see the same behavior.
> 
> Will report a bug.
> 
> J.G

well, I gave you the info so that you were able to see that the
documentation is *aware of the fact* that from wheezy installer to
jessie installer things have changed, and therefore it's probable that
you run into issues here. You are always free to file a bug, but you can
also check if there has been a documented change in (1), that might
affect your installation process.

Quote:
3.1.2. Automated installation

Some changes mentioned in the previous section also imply changes
in the support in the installer for automated installation using
preconfiguration files. This means that if you have existing
preconfiguration files that worked with the wheezy installer, you
cannot expect these to work with the new installer without
modification.

The Installation Guide (https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/
installmanual) has an updated separate appendix with extensive
documentation on using preconfiguration.

It was Section 3.1.2 of Jessie's release notes, not 3.2, as I
erroneously stated in my previous mail.

Cheers,

Stephan

(1) https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/News/

Re: Script vs command line behaviour

[Henrique de Moraes Holschuh]

On Sat, 15 Oct 2016, Andre Majorel wrote:
> Or is pkill more than a wrapper around kill(pid, 15) and
> kill(pid, 9) ?

pkill is quite less prone to killing the wrong process due to a race
when you use it properly.

In the general case one should avoid SIGKILL.  Trying other signals that
allow for orderly exit first is extremely recommended.  SIGTERM being
the typical one you'd want.  There is also SIGQUIT, but too many
programers get it wrong and trap SIGTERM for clean exit, but forget to
actually trap SIGQUIT as well.

> I used to have a user who had the bad habit of indiscriminately
> going straight for SIGKILL. It was annoying. But not as much as
> the fact that SIGKILL can't do anything about processes stuck in
> "D" state. I really wish I knew a way to get rid of these.

Processes are stuck in "D" state when the kernel is doing something on
their behalf.

State "D" is not really "waiting for IO" as I have seen people describe
it, it would be more correct to call it "in the middle of a syscall".
"waiting for IO" is just a subset of the reasons why a process can get
stuck in "D" state... even if it is the most common one (AFAIK).

-- 
  Henrique Holschuh

Deux icônes wicd en bas barre des têches

[andre_debian]

Bonjour,

Sous le bureau tde-trinity,
j'ai toujours 2 icônes wicd en bas de la barre des tâches à droite,
qui correspondent à ces 2 processus python :
/usr/bin/python -O /usr/share/wicd/gtk/wicd-client.py --tray
/usr/bin/python -O /usr/share/wicd/gtk/wicd-client.py

Si je "kill" un de ces 2 processus, une icône disparait,
mais au prochain boot les 2 s'affichent à nouveau.

Comment éliminer un de ces processus pour n'avoir
qu'une seule icône ?

Merci.

André

Re: uswsusp - security hole fixed?

[Teemu Likonen]

Hans [2016-10-15 13:44:41+02] wrote:

> as I am a little security aimed, my /usr, /var and /home (each on a
> separate partition) are enrypted with luks.

> I would be happy, when someone could make some things for me a little
> bit clearer,

I think the usual and better way is to have an unencrypted /boot and a
single other LUKS partition which contains LVM logical volumes for
everything else (swap, / and whatever). So swap is encrypted too. I have
had this setup for ages on desktop and laptop and it has always worked
(including s2disk).


-- 
/// Teemu Likonen   - .-..    //
// PGP: 4E10 55DC 84E9 DFF6 13D7 8557 719D 69D3 2453 9450 ///


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: Sylpheed et Maildir

[Haricophile]

Le Mon, 10 Oct 2016 16:41:08 +0200,
bernard schoenacker  a écrit :

> autrement il est possible de convertir le format maildir vers
> le format MH :
> 
> http://www.theory.bham.ac.uk/staff/schofield/linux/maildir2mh
> 
> attention c'est un début de piste pour le script perl 

Perso, dans les solutions, je configure un imap et je transfère les
dossiers par là, comme ça pas d'histoire de conversion de format.

-- 
haricoph...@aranha.fr 

uswsusp - security hole fixed?

[Hans]

Hello list,

as I am a little security aimed, my /usr, /var and /home (each on a separate 
partition) are enrypted with luks.

Some time ago, I discovered, that when I suspend my system (suspend-to-disk), 
and resume it again, I did not need to enter the password for /usr. 

Well, my computer asked for it, but pressing enter for three times let the 
system boot up. The resume device was the swap device, which was not 
encrypted. 

This means, at that time, the password to encrypt the partitions were stored 
on the swap device when suspended. Very bad idea!!!

So, my solution was, to encrypt the swap partition, too (with luks).  (Yes, I 
know, this is not officially recommended)

That worked well in the security sense. But from now on appeared a new 
problem: resume did not always work well (although the swap device was opened 
well at resume) and from time to time I had to add the parameter "noresume" at 
boot. Also not much satisfying. 

Now I changed back to an unencrypted swap device, resume works well again.

However, the behaviour changed: When entering the wrong password at resume for 
/usr three times, the system shuts off and reboots again. This new boot is a 
fresh boot, it is no resume. 

So far to the situatiion. 

Now my notes/questions:

1. What is the status of suspend to disk at the moment, when we use encrypted 
partitions with the prior look to security? Known bugs? Not possible?

2.  When entering the wrong password(s), the system should not fresh reboot, 
but starting in resume  mode again.

3. I believe, the memory data and the swap data can be stored somewhere else, 
so IMO it should be /usr by default. Good idea?

4. Do I need UUID entries in some config files? respective Are UUID entries 
preferred before standard entries like /dev/sdaX?

My hardware is an EEEPC 1005HGO, debian/testing 32-bit, actual packet versions 
(from today).

I would be happy, when someone could make some things for me a little bit 
clearer, as uswsusp also involves cryptsetup and update-iniramfs-tools, which 
are also configured, when I run "dpkg-reconfigure uswsusp".

Maybe other people might also be interested in security and want to know.

Thanks for any help.

Best regards

Hans

Re: restart après poweroff

[Jean-Michel OLTRA]

Bonjour,


Le samedi 15 octobre 2016, Vincent Lefevre a écrit...


> > Depuis une mise à jour d'une testing sur le portable de ma fille (il y a
> > quelques semaines), sa machine redémarre après l'arrêt. Il y a bien
> > arrêt, puis, une à deux secondes après, la machine redémarre.

> Idem sur mon portable, mais de façon aléatoire. La première fois,
> je n'étais pas au courant, et mon portable est donc resté deux
> heures dans mon sac, sans aération. Il était brûlant...

Et ? Tu as trouvé une solution ? Je n'ai pas vu ni ma fille, ni son
portable, donc je n'ai pas pu encore tester la solution proposée.

-- 
jm

Re: restart après poweroff

[Vincent Lefevre]

On 2016-10-09 21:16:09 +0200, Jean-Michel OLTRA wrote:
> Depuis une mise à jour d'une testing sur le portable de ma fille (il y a
> quelques semaines), sa machine redémarre après l'arrêt. Il y a bien
> arrêt, puis, une à deux secondes après, la machine redémarre.

Idem sur mon portable, mais de façon aléatoire. La première fois,
je n'étais pas au courant, et mon portable est donc resté deux
heures dans mon sac, sans aération. Il était brûlant...

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre  - Web: 
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: 
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

Re: restart après poweroff

[Vincent Lefevre]

On 2016-10-15 12:01:31 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2016-10-09 21:16:09 +0200, Jean-Michel OLTRA wrote:
> > Depuis une mise à jour d'une testing sur le portable de ma fille (il y a
> > quelques semaines), sa machine redémarre après l'arrêt. Il y a bien
> > arrêt, puis, une à deux secondes après, la machine redémarre.
> 
> Idem sur mon portable, mais de façon aléatoire. La première fois,
> je n'étais pas au courant, et mon portable est donc resté deux
  ^
resté allumé

> heures dans mon sac, sans aération. Il était brûlant...

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre  - Web: 
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: 
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

Re: Script vs command line behaviour

[Andre Majorel]

On 2016-10-12 08:40 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 09:34:22PM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> > # The systemctl stop for svnserve may not work as I haven't got around to 
> > # making a stop script for it.
> > # So kill the process the old fashioned way
> > ps -ef | grep svnserve | grep -v grep | awk '{print $2}' | xargs kill -9
> 
> Please consider replacing this with some variant of:
> 
> pkill svnserve
> 
> And stop using -9 (SIGKILL).  Forever.  Pretend it never existed.

Perhaps Greg means : try "kill " before "kill -9 ".
Or is pkill more than a wrapper around kill(pid, 15) and
kill(pid, 9) ?

I used to have a user who had the bad habit of indiscriminately
going straight for SIGKILL. It was annoying. But not as much as
the fact that SIGKILL can't do anything about processes stuck in
"D" state. I really wish I knew a way to get rid of these.

-- 
André Majorel 
bugs.debian.org, a spambot's best friend.

Re: creacion de paquetes

[Aaron D.]

On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 01:21:27 +0200
juan carlos rebate  wrote:

> 
> 
> El 15/10/16 a las 00:36, Felix Perez escribió:
> > El día 14 de octubre de 2016, 17:12, juan carlos Rebate
> >  escribió:
> >>
> >> El 14/10/16 a las 21:46, Pablo JIMÉNEZ escribió:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 07:50:19PM +0200, juan carlos rebate wrote:
> >>
> >> El 14/10/16 a las 19:37, Pablo JIMÉNEZ escribió:
> >>
> >> Porque si no te resulta conveniente la versión provista en la
> >> colección de paquetes, lo mejor será partas compilando FFMPEG según
> >> tus preferencias y luego procedas con el empaquetamiento.
> >>
> >> Saludos.
> >>
> >> la compilacion se hace perfecta osea habilito lo que quiero con el 
> >> configure
> >> y luego make se compila perfecto (se tira 40 minutos pero es normal) el 
> >> tema
> >> es la creacion de paquetes
> >>
> >> ¿Revisaste el «Debian New Maintainers' Guide» y configuraste tu entorno
> >> de la manera recomendada? Quizás eso te sirva de algo...
> >>
> >> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/
> >> https://debian-handbook.info/browse/stable/sect.building-first-package.html
> >>
> >> Saludos.
> >>
> >> veo no se entiende lo que necesito, ese enlace que me diste del libro del
> >> administrador es para modificar codigo de un paquete ya compilado, eso no 
> >> es
> >> lo que pedi, imaginen que uds han creado una aplicacion, esa aplicacion
> >> logicamente necesitara un paquete nuevo creado por uds, bien eso mismo 
> >> busco
> >> yo, crear paquetes NUEVOS de un software que no esta en un repo, no quiero
> >> MODIFICAR ni RECOMPILAR ni crear un paquete virtual derivado de ese
> > Si no se entiende es que no te haz sabido explicar.  ¿Preguntaste en
> > la lista de ubuntu?
> >
> > Por enésima vez debian no es igual a ubuntu, si bien comparten muchas
> > cosas algunas otras son distintas y más encima por lo que veo lo haces
> > en una maquina virtual.
> >
> > Y no estimado ubuntu no es un debian tuneado.
> >
> >
> >
> ubuntu no tiene listas solo foros y si lo comente y nada, quiza ubuntu 
> no comparta todo pero si lo esencial y dpkg es parte de lo esencial y si 
> un paquete funcion en ubuntu funciona en debian (por experiencia lo 
> probe con muy buenos resultados) si dpkg es el mismo los paquetes se 
> crearan igual no?
> 

Sino existen listas en ubuntu no sé a que estaré suscrito yo... 

Lista de ubuntu en español: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-es

Todas las listas de ubuntu: https://lists.ubuntu.com/

-- 
Aaron D. 


pgp8CqRVvF43Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: creacion de paquetes

[Juan Lavieri]

El 14-10-2016 a las 07:21 p.m., juan carlos rebate escribió:



El 15/10/16 a las 00:36, Felix Perez escribió:

El día 14 de octubre de 2016, 17:12, juan carlos Rebate
 escribió:


El 14/10/16 a las 21:46, Pablo JIMÉNEZ escribió:

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 07:50:19PM +0200, juan carlos rebate wrote:

El 14/10/16 a las 19:37, Pablo JIMÉNEZ escribió:

Porque si no te resulta conveniente la versión provista en la
colección de paquetes, lo mejor será partas compilando FFMPEG según
tus preferencias y luego procedas con el empaquetamiento.

Saludos.

la compilacion se hace perfecta osea habilito lo que quiero con el 
configure
y luego make se compila perfecto (se tira 40 minutos pero es normal) 
el tema

es la creacion de paquetes

¿Revisaste el «Debian New Maintainers' Guide» y configuraste tu entorno
de la manera recomendada? Quizás eso te sirva de algo...

https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/
https://debian-handbook.info/browse/stable/sect.building-first-package.html 



Saludos.

veo no se entiende lo que necesito, ese enlace que me diste del 
libro del
administrador es para modificar codigo de un paquete ya compilado, 
eso no es

lo que pedi, imaginen que uds han creado una aplicacion, esa aplicacion
logicamente necesitara un paquete nuevo creado por uds, bien eso 
mismo busco
yo, crear paquetes NUEVOS de un software que no esta en un repo, no 
quiero

MODIFICAR ni RECOMPILAR ni crear un paquete virtual derivado de ese

Si no se entiende es que no te haz sabido explicar. ¿Preguntaste en
la lista de ubuntu?

Por enésima vez debian no es igual a ubuntu, si bien comparten muchas
cosas algunas otras son distintas y más encima por lo que veo lo haces
en una maquina virtual.

Y no estimado ubuntu no es un debian tuneado.



ubuntu no tiene listas solo foros y si lo comente y nada, quiza ubuntu 
no comparta todo pero si lo esencial y dpkg es parte de lo esencial y 
si un paquete funcion en ubuntu funciona en debian (por experiencia lo 
probe con muy buenos resultados)


¡Qué bien!  Hace tiempo estuve intentando instalar unity en GNU/Debian.  
Por favor ¿Me podrías decir cómo?



si dpkg es el mismo los paquetes se crearan igual no?



Gracias.

--
Juan M Lavieri

Errar es de humanos, pero es mas humano culpar a los demás.