Re: .forward not working

1997-04-08 Thread Jason Killen
I'm using sendmail *duck*.  And it seems to work sorta I think
my problem is one with procmail and slocal.  Although I havent played much
with getting it to forward to another address, that was a problem from
a user that I couldn't figure out.


In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Jason Killen writes:
 
 Does anyone have any idea why .forward would not forward or pipe to a progra
m
 (ie procmail).  It seems like it is not even being looked at.

Ouh, I thougt it was a misconfiguration by me on my machine in the
offices.  Reading this it doesn't seem to be. :-(

I came across the same problem.

.forward is working fine as long as there are only some email
addresses inside.  It seems that Smail can't execute a program
at this point.  (maybe procmail can't be called as 'nobody')

Seems I have to investigate my configuration on finlandia with
the one on troi

Regards

   Joey

-- 
  / Martin Schulze * Debian GNU/Linux Developer * [EMAIL PROTECTED] /
 / http://www.debian.org/  http://home.pages.de/~joey/
--
Jason Killen Question Stupidity
Ma ma's don't let your babies grow up to be Linux hackers 
Monolith : the new ANSI standard for humans 
PGP fingerprint = 64 71 48 14 31 AE C6 70  E4 4F 64 EB 3B AA 00 6B
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 


Re: .forward not working

1997-04-08 Thread George Bonser

Uhm, isn't smail finicky about the permissions on a .forward file?  If it
does not trust the file, it will not obey it.



I am giving .sigs a break this month

George Bonser
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


.forward not working

1997-04-07 Thread Jason Killen

Does anyone have any idea why .forward would not forward or pipe to a program
(ie procmail).  It seems like it is not even being looked at.

Thanks
--
Jason Killen Question Stupidity
Ma ma's don't let your babies grow up to be Linux hackers 
Monolith : the new ANSI standard for humans 
PGP fingerprint = 64 71 48 14 31 AE C6 70  E4 4F 64 EB 3B AA 00 6B
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 


Re: .forward not working

1997-04-07 Thread Paul Wade
I think it needs to be world-readable. I was playing with it last week and
found that the smail log will show when a program is invoked. That helped
me get from step n to n+1.

On Mon, 7 Apr 1997, Jason Killen wrote:

 
 Does anyone have any idea why .forward would not forward or pipe to a program
 (ie procmail).  It seems like it is not even being looked at.
 
 Thanks
 --
 Jason Killen Question Stupidity
 Ma ma's don't let your babies grow up to be Linux hackers 
 Monolith : the new ANSI standard for humans 
 PGP fingerprint = 64 71 48 14 31 AE C6 70  E4 4F 64 EB 3B AA 00 6B
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
  
 

Paul Wade - Greenbush Technologies Corporation
http://www.greenbush.com/cds.html
Linux CD's sent worldwide


Re: .forward not working

1997-04-07 Thread Martin Schulze
Jason Killen writes:
 
 Does anyone have any idea why .forward would not forward or pipe to a program
 (ie procmail).  It seems like it is not even being looked at.

Ouh, I thougt it was a misconfiguration by me on my machine in the
offices.  Reading this it doesn't seem to be. :-(

I came across the same problem.

.forward is working fine as long as there are only some email
addresses inside.  It seems that Smail can't execute a program
at this point.  (maybe procmail can't be called as 'nobody')

Seems I have to investigate my configuration on finlandia with
the one on troi

Regards

Joey

-- 
  / Martin Schulze * Debian GNU/Linux Developer * [EMAIL PROTECTED] /
 / http://www.debian.org/  http://home.pages.de/~joey/


Re: .forward not working

1997-04-07 Thread Pete Harlan
  Does anyone have any idea why .forward would not forward or pipe
  to a program (ie procmail).  It seems like it is not even being
  looked at.
 
 I came across the same problem.
 
 .forward is working fine as long as there are only some email
 addresses inside.  It seems that Smail can't execute a program

Perhaps you have a space after the pipe?  I think smail doesn't ignore
those spaces (though sendmail does).

--
Pete Harlan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]