Re: Easy to use Mail Spam/ Content Filter?
Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Paul Johnson wrote: I don't understand where you get the impression that I expect everybody to spend every waking moment reporting spam. It's really not that hard, spamcop.net speeds it up. If you're a paying member, you even have access to quick reporting, which is practically fire-and-forget. I don't have time isn't an excuse anymore. Simple math, really. Several thousand spam a day times a minute or two to report each one means no time left for anything else even at peak effciency. Get spamcop's automatic reporting. Forward all your spam in one big email as attachments to the reporting address. Change subject to reply anyway. You'll get a message letting you know how it went. -- Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux. You can find a worse OS, but it costs more. pgpkTCzIG85rB.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Easy to use Mail Spam/ Content Filter?
Paul Johnson wrote: Get spamcop's automatic reporting. Forward all your spam in one big email as attachments to the reporting address. Change subject to reply anyway. You'll get a message letting you know how it went. Now Paul. You know as well as I do that you're not supposed to CC unless requested. Should I report that as spam? It certainly was unsolicited. Secondly to forward all my spam to spamcop I would have to *TURN OFF* my spam filtering as it is at the SMTP level. Third I am not kidding when I mean I go through thousands of spam a day. No, Paul, not happening. Get off your high ass aspiring to be a nag. -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls. ---+- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Easy to use Mail Spam/ Content Filter?
Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Paul Johnson wrote: Just hitting delete is considered harmful with spam (you should be reporting it). We've gone over this, Paul. So far you have not volunteered to report spam for the rest of us since you feel that we're just as bad as spammers for not spending our every waking hour reporting spam. I don't understand where you get the impression that I expect everybody to spend every waking moment reporting spam. It's really not that hard, spamcop.net speeds it up. If you're a paying member, you even have access to quick reporting, which is practically fire-and-forget. I don't have time isn't an excuse anymore. -- Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux. You can find a worse OS, but it costs more. pgp8IlKXFMyQO.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Easy to use Mail Spam/ Content Filter?
Paul Johnson wrote: I don't understand where you get the impression that I expect everybody to spend every waking moment reporting spam. It's really not that hard, spamcop.net speeds it up. If you're a paying member, you even have access to quick reporting, which is practically fire-and-forget. I don't have time isn't an excuse anymore. Simple math, really. Several thousand spam a day times a minute or two to report each one means no time left for anything else even at peak effciency. -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls. ---+- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Easy to use Mail Spam/ Content Filter?
Karsten M. Self [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Easy? Delete key. Just hitting delete is considered harmful with spam (you should be reporting it). -- Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux. You can find a worse OS, but it costs more. pgpY3TQRgHj4l.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Easy to use Mail Spam/ Content Filter?
Paul Johnson wrote: Just hitting delete is considered harmful with spam (you should be reporting it). We've gone over this, Paul. So far you have not volunteered to report spam for the rest of us since you feel that we're just as bad as spammers for not spending our every waking hour reporting spam. -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls. ---+- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Easy to use Mail Spam/ Content Filter?
Osamu Aoki wrote: After reading recent flame-fest at d-devel, I found crm114 and dspam seemed interesting. crm114 is very light and already packaged. I like HOWTO at http://triplehelix.org/~joshk/CRM114.html Also check original home page crm114.sourceforge.net This is supercharged auto-learn grep and very simple design. Within a day of learning, I get very good filtering. I dropped almost all procmail recipe filtering junks. I was quite impressed it works with mixed Japanese/English environment. This is by far the excellent filter you can teach without programming. For DSPAM which uses database as backend. Too fancy for me but its web page is very informative. www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam/ This has web server support and alternative web support is provided by php backend, http://www.michaelthompson.org/dspam/ Thanks, i will try CRM114 and DSPAM, seems to be what i need. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Easy to use Mail Spam/ Content Filter?
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 06:58:17PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: on Sun, May 16, 2004 at 12:29:39PM +0200, Stefan Drees ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: i?m searching for an easy to configure mail spam/ content filter, configurable over an web frontend. [...] Easy? Delete key. Powerful? procmail. Or the Perl-based tool whose name I can never remember. Mailmumble. maildrop, I'm guessing. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [toread] Re: Easy to use Mail Spam/ Content Filter?
Powerful? procmail. Or the Perl-based tool whose name I can never remember. Mailmumble. maildrop, I'm guessing. popfile I use, seems pretty good -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Easy to use Mail Spam/ Content Filter?
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:57:33PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 06:58:17PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: on Sun, May 16, 2004 at 12:29:39PM +0200, Stefan Drees ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: i?m searching for an easy to configure mail spam/ content filter, configurable over an web frontend. [...] Easy? Delete key. Powerful? procmail. Or the Perl-based tool whose name I can never remember. Mailmumble. maildrop, I'm guessing. After reading recent flame-fest at d-devel, I found crm114 and dspam seemed interesting. crm114 is very light and already packaged. I like HOWTO at http://triplehelix.org/~joshk/CRM114.html Also check original home page crm114.sourceforge.net This is supercharged auto-learn grep and very simple design. Within a day of learning, I get very good filtering. I dropped almost all procmail recipe filtering junks. I was quite impressed it works with mixed Japanese/English environment. This is by far the excellent filter you can teach without programming. For DSPAM which uses database as backend. Too fancy for me but its web page is very informative. www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam/ This has web server support and alternative web support is provided by php backend, http://www.michaelthompson.org/dspam/ -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Easy to use Mail Spam/ Content Filter?
Hi, i´m searching for an easy to configure mail spam/ content filter, configurable over an web frontend. I know about amavis/ spamassassin but i din´t found an easy to use/ understand web frontend. Commercial products are also ok. Till know i´m using only amavis to scan for viruses, but my boss wants to keep also spam away and because of that i´m not the only one using it, it must be easy as possible:-). Hope you can give me some hints. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Easy to use Mail Spam/ Content Filter?
on Sun, May 16, 2004 at 12:29:39PM +0200, Stefan Drees ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, i?m searching for an easy to configure mail spam/ content filter, configurable over an web frontend. I know about amavis/ spamassassin but i din?t found an easy to use/ understand web frontend. Commercial products are also ok. Till know i?m using only amavis to scan for viruses, but my boss wants to keep also spam away and because of that i?m not the only one using it, it must be easy as possible:-). Hope you can give me some hints. Please insert *two* carriage returns between paragraphs and standardize your linelengths. Helps readability extensively. Easy? Delete key. Powerful? procmail. Or the Perl-based tool whose name I can never remember. Mailmumble. If your goal is automated mail filtering, there are tools you can set up on your server to do this, or whole-hog solutions. Outsourcing this is probably the easiest solution. Costs typically $4-10/mo per account. Peace. -- Karsten M. Self [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What Part of Gestalt don't you understand? When Adam delved and Even span, who was then the gentleman? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
