Ethics Violation

1999-04-06 Thread Jesse Gilman


I apologize to XFree86, as a group and to
the members thereof, for my confusion of them with
the Open Group, in my previous post.  Branden
Robinson brought my mistake to my attention, and
promptly.  Let me thank him for this. I have
become familiar with Branden's name as a result of
seeing it many times as the developer or
co-developer of X-based software within the Debian
community, in other words, software that we all
use.


Ethics Violation in XFree86

1999-04-05 Thread Jesse Gilman
I am a Debian user. Doesn't Debian have an ethics
policy?  What about software, even free software,
whose technical documentation plainly and bluntly
lies about its capabilities? I refer to XFree86's
pervasively well-documented feature of supporting
multiheaded (multiple monitored) systems.  I have
just spent some $450 for a monitor and a card,
based on my perusal of the technical
documentation, and attempted to hook up the
monitor to my PC, beside the other one. It took me
a week to delve into the documents, write all the
scripts and put everything together. Only to
discover at the end of my money and time that
nothing worked or could work. I would have been
better off to buy a 19'' monitor, had I not been
misled --- only now I can't. My money is spent on
an unusable monitor. And I'll bet that I am not
the first or the last to be caught so.

While I appreciate the efforts of those in the
free sofware community, I also fully well and
reasonably expect developers not to knowingly tell
outright lies. There is an expectation raised in
the minds of those who use documentation which is
technical that it is, indeed, technical and meets
a higher standard of truth than mere expository
literature.  The expectation is given further
given merit when the documentation is that of a
widely used package and normally, usually meets
that higher standard of truth for everyday
purposes. The ethics violation is worse when it
occurs in such a situation.

What good is free software when people are
deliberately misled about what it can do? How many
rotten apples in the barrell does it take to
infect the good ones there?

Regards,
Jesse Gilman
The Atlantum


Re: Ethics Violation in XFree86

1999-04-05 Thread Steve Lamb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 05 Apr 1998 23:29:53 -0400, Jesse Gilman wrote:

What about software, even free software, whose technical documentation 
plainly and bluntly lies about its capabilities? I refer to XFree86's 
pervasively well-documented feature of supporting multiheaded (multiple 
monitored) systems.

OK.  After reading this I cd'd to /usr/doc/X11/ and read XFree86-FAQ.gz. 

In less than a minute I found the following:

  Q.A14- Can I use more than one video card in the same machine with XFree86?
  
   Although it is technically possible to use multiple PCI-based SVGA
   cards in the same machine, none of the servers currently support this.
   
   The VGA16 and Mono servers are both capable of running both a VGA
   compatible card and a non-VGA compatible monochrome card in the same
   machine.
   
   For XFree86-4.0 we are working on true multi head support.
   

I have just spent some $450 for a monitor and a card, based on my perusal
of the technical documentation

Then I fail to see how you could miss that clear indication that XFree86
does not support the feature you were seeking.  Anything which is readily
found by someone in under a minute with a simple search isn't all that hard
to find at all, IMHO.

It took me a week to delve into the documents, write all the scripts and put 
everything together.

A week to delve into the documents and not once did you read the FAQ?

What good is free software when people are deliberately misled about what it
can do? How many rotten apples in the barrell does it take to infect the
good ones there?

I dunno, but before you go off half-cocked again, might I suggest reading
ALL the documentation, especially the one clearly marked as answering the
*F*requently *A*sked *Q*uestions.


- -- 
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
 ICQ: 5107343  | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- ---+-

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc

iQA/AwUBNwgx7Xpf7K2LbpnFEQJqNwCgxQdFM9bJk9nbiVLmXyqBT/bhV9wAoLc+
KJ1IGHHQ04g9ZN7I8PnNAm99
=fV4o
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: Ethics Violation in XFree86

1999-04-05 Thread Branden Robinson
I need not add much to what Steve Lamb said on this subject, but it sounds
to me like you have confused XFree86 with the Open Group, and specifically
the latter's release of X11R6.4, which supports the XINERAMA extension for
multi-head support.

XFree86 4.0 will be based on X11R6.4.  They might have had it sooner but
the Open Group played games with the X license last year.

Next time, check your sources.  And if you're going to make charges of
unethical behavior, you'd better be ready with support for them.  As in,
URL's to this alleged false advertising.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson  |
Debian GNU/Linux |The software said it required Windows
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |3.1 or better, so I installed Linux.
cartoon.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ |


pgpZ6hNaUX4si.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Ethics Violation in XFree86 (also: What do YOU lose with Linux)

1999-04-05 Thread Jerzy Kakol
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Gilman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Sunday, April 04, 1999 10:34 PM
Subject: Ethics Violation in XFree86

lies about its capabilities? I refer to XFree86's
pervasively well-documented feature of supporting
multiheaded (multiple monitored) systems.  I have
just spent some $450 for a monitor and a card,

Jesse, you can still salvage your investment (thanks to the diversity in the
free software community, BTW). Just take a look at
http://www.ggi-project.org . You can have even a TV wall powered by your
Debian box if you want. What I've learned playing with Linux within past
several years was that there is very rarely true to say that Linux does not
have something (software, functionality, capability, application etc.).
Unlike other (commercial) OSs which you can see only as a ready to ship
products, on a store's shelf, in case of Linux we have to remember always
that there is also third category of things (besides those 'Linux have' and
'Linux doesn't have): there are also things Linux is about to have. Do you
need a piece of a new functionality? I can guarantee you that there is a
project lurking somewhere in the Net which satisfies or will satisfy your
expactations.

  George Kakol
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 CYMPAK, INC.
 tel  (215) 826-9555
 fax (215) 826-9558
 3930 Nebraska St.
 Newportville, PA 19056