Re: GCC 3.2 and STLport on Woody
On Saturday 28 September 2002 01:46 am, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: On Friday 27 September 2002 22:08, Oleg wrote: On Friday 27 September 2002 11:40 pm, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: On Friday 27 September 2002 17:57, Oleg wrote: Hi Are there any compatible debs for GCC 3.2 and STLport that I can use on Woody? I tried installing using the sources, but apparently there are some issues (perhaps the ABI change) Why do you need STLPort? The STL in the 3.2 library is quite good. Compiling 3.2 under woody should be easy enough and pbuilder can help ensure any requirements do not break your box. STLport provides a checked implementation of STL, GCC doesn't. Also, have you ever benchmarked C++ streams in GCC? streams have never been the slow part of my programs (-: I can understand the desire for checked containers though. My answer remains the same -- should be easy to compile both under woody, especially using pbuilder. Building is not the problem. I have been using GCC 3.2 that I built from sources, and I was successful in building STLport recently, however, I can not run programs that I compile using them together: either static linking fails, or if I link dynamically, the programs won't start. I have heard that the ABI changed, and I suspect that this may have something to do with it. Oleg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GCC 3.2 and STLport on Woody
On Friday 27 September 2002 17:57, Oleg wrote: Hi Are there any compatible debs for GCC 3.2 and STLport that I can use on Woody? I tried installing using the sources, but apparently there are some issues (perhaps the ABI change) Why do you need STLPort? The STL in the 3.2 library is quite good. Compiling 3.2 under woody should be easy enough and pbuilder can help ensure any requirements do not break your box. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GCC 3.2 and STLport on Woody
On Friday 27 September 2002 11:40 pm, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: On Friday 27 September 2002 17:57, Oleg wrote: Hi Are there any compatible debs for GCC 3.2 and STLport that I can use on Woody? I tried installing using the sources, but apparently there are some issues (perhaps the ABI change) Why do you need STLPort? The STL in the 3.2 library is quite good. Compiling 3.2 under woody should be easy enough and pbuilder can help ensure any requirements do not break your box. STLport provides a checked implementation of STL, GCC doesn't. Also, have you ever benchmarked C++ streams in GCC? Oleg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GCC 3.2 and STLport on Woody
On Friday 27 September 2002 22:08, Oleg wrote: On Friday 27 September 2002 11:40 pm, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: On Friday 27 September 2002 17:57, Oleg wrote: Hi Are there any compatible debs for GCC 3.2 and STLport that I can use on Woody? I tried installing using the sources, but apparently there are some issues (perhaps the ABI change) Why do you need STLPort? The STL in the 3.2 library is quite good. Compiling 3.2 under woody should be easy enough and pbuilder can help ensure any requirements do not break your box. STLport provides a checked implementation of STL, GCC doesn't. Also, have you ever benchmarked C++ streams in GCC? streams have never been the slow part of my programs (-: I can understand the desire for checked containers though. My answer remains the same -- should be easy to compile both under woody, especially using pbuilder. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
