Re: IPX woes-want old module and new kernel-possible?

1999-09-19 Thread Gregory T. Norris
Manually applying the rejects for the oltr driver is a fairly trivial
operation.  If you'd like, I can email you a cleaned-up version of the
patch which applies to 2.2.12.

On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 08:34:02PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Also, I have a dilemma.  My token-ring card (Olicom) will compile into the
 2.2.9 kernel, but the patch fails on higher versions.  Their suggestion to
 patch 2.2.9 for olicom, then use the kernel patches to raise 2.2.9 up higher 
 also failed.  So I thought about this:
 
   How about compiling the driver as a module, then recompiling the
 kernel at the 2.2.12(13?) level with solely token ring support built in.
 Then use it with the module.  Or is this totally brainless?  (Mind you that
 I plead ignorance based on being a chemist, not a comp. scientist. ;)


IPX woes-want old module and new kernel-possible?

1999-09-18 Thread kaynjay
Thanks to earlier suggestions about pinpointing the source of my kernel slowing
down... it is the ipx service causing problems.  While others have noted in
earlier posts ipx issues with the 2.2.x kernels, I found none which involved
a slowdown/lockup of the machine itself.  Don't know if this is a first...?

I would like to move up from 2.0.36.  Does anyone know if one of the higher 
versions has the ipx bug resolved?  

Also, I have a dilemma.  My token-ring card (Olicom) will compile into the
2.2.9 kernel, but the patch fails on higher versions.  Their suggestion to
patch 2.2.9 for olicom, then use the kernel patches to raise 2.2.9 up higher 
also failed.  So I thought about this:

How about compiling the driver as a module, then recompiling the
kernel at the 2.2.12(13?) level with solely token ring support built in.
Then use it with the module.  Or is this totally brainless?  (Mind you that
I plead ignorance based on being a chemist, not a comp. scientist. ;)

Kenward