Re: Kernel date stamp?
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 04:07:26PM -0600, s. keeling wrote: Incoming from Danny O'Brien: We updated the kernel this weekend using apt-get update followed by apt-get kernel ver. However, uname-a delivers the following response: Linux mail 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686 unknown Why is this kernel dated April, 2002? Is this the most recent version? Old kernel. I have: Linux infidel 2.4.18-1-686 #1 Wed Apr 14 18:20:10 UTC 2004 i686 unknown This has all the known security fixes applied to the stable version of the kernel. and to get it, your sources.list contains--what? :) -- I use Debian/GNU Linux version 3.0; Linux boss 2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Son Apr 14 09:53:28 CEST 2002 i586 unknown DEBIAN NEWBIE TIP #105 from Michael Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] : How can you DELETE OLD MESSAGES IN MUTT? You can have your .muttrc set up to automatically do this. I have my debian mailing list messages delete after a period of time by adding the following to my .muttrc file. I also have read debian list messages move after I read them... This only means I have to manually enter the old folder for mutt to manage the deletions for me. mbox-hook =spam /home/mperry/oldmail/spamread mbox-hook =debianstuff /home/mperry/oldmail/debianread That moves the read mail to another folder... and then folder-hook /home/mperry/mail/spam 'push D~r10d!~F\n' folder-hook /home/mperry/oldmail/debianread 'push D~r30d!~F\n' Here it automatically deletes messages older than 30 days. See the manual (/usr/share/doc/mutt/html) for more info. Also see http://newbieDoc.sourceForge.net/ ... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Kernel date stamp?
Incoming from Will Trillich: On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 04:07:26PM -0600, s. keeling wrote: Incoming from Danny O'Brien: We updated the kernel this weekend using apt-get update followed by apt-get kernel ver. However, uname-a delivers the following response: Linux mail 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686 unknown Why is this kernel dated April, 2002? Is this the most recent version? Old kernel. I have: Linux infidel 2.4.18-1-686 #1 Wed Apr 14 18:20:10 UTC 2004 i686 unknown This has all the known security fixes applied to the stable version of the kernel. and to get it, your sources.list contains--what? :) Stock, stable, Woody: deb http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ woody main contrib non-free deb ftp://ftp.rfc822.org/debian-security/ stable/updates main contrib non-free among others. apt-cache search kernel-image-2.4.18-1-686 -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling - - -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Kernel date stamp?
Incoming from Danny O'Brien: We updated the kernel this weekend using apt-get update followed by apt-get kernel ver. However, uname-a delivers the following response: Linux mail 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686 unknown Why is this kernel dated April, 2002? Is this the most recent version? Old kernel. I have: Linux infidel 2.4.18-1-686 #1 Wed Apr 14 18:20:10 UTC 2004 i686 unknown This has all the known security fixes applied to the stable version of the kernel. -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling - - -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Kernel date stamp?
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 11:10:13AM -0400, Danny O'Brien wrote: We updated the kernel this weekend using apt-get update followed by apt-get kernel ver. However, uname-a delivers the following response: Linux mail 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686 unknown Why is this kernel dated April, 2002? Is this the most recent version? That's the build date. Remember that the last stable release was released in July 2002 ... There are more recent builds (with security patches applied) that are in the security archives, or you can use make-kpkg to compile more recent kernel *versions* (see www.kernel.org for the current versions) from sources. -- I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment. See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures. My key was last signed 10/14/2003. If you use GPG *please* see me about signing the key. * My computer can't give you viruses by email. *** -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kernel date stamp?
We updated the kernel this weekend using apt-get update followed by apt-get kernel ver. However, uname-a delivers the following response: Linux mail 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686 unknown Why is this kernel dated April, 2002? Is this the most recent version? TIA, Danny O'Brien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Kernel date stamp?
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 11:10:13AM -0400, Danny O'Brien wrote: We updated the kernel this weekend using apt-get update followed by apt-get kernel ver. However, uname-a delivers the following response: Linux mail 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686 unknown Why is this kernel dated April, 2002? Is this the most recent version? That's the build date. Remember that the last stable release was released in July 2002 ... -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Kernel date stamp?
Danny O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We updated the kernel this weekend using apt-get update followed by apt-get kernel ver. However, uname-a delivers the following response: Linux mail 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686 unknown Why is this kernel dated April, 2002? Is this the most recent version? That's when it was compiled. No, it's not the most recent version, go browse through aptitude and you'll see more than one version of kernel-image... -- Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux. You can find a worse OS, but it costs more. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
