Re: Missing links of libraries (*.so) on Debian 11

[songbird]

Greg Wooledge wrote:
...
> And yes, "ldd /path/to/the-program" would also be useful information.

  my guess is that the OP did not know that they needed to
install the build-depends for this package and then tried
to build it.

  hopefully i'm wrong, but if i'm not a simple answer is
to install the build-depends for the package.  they may
need to add a deb-src line to their /etc/apt/sources.list
before doing that install.


  songbird

Re: Missing links of libraries (*.so) on Debian 11

[The Wanderer]

On 2023-01-16 at 09:39, Thomas Schmitt wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Nicolas George wrote:
> 
>> The .so symbolic are not for running programs, they are for
>> building them. For running, you only need the .so.vers links.
> 
> Yes, but at build time, the actually used SONAME is recorded in the binary.
> ldd will show library.so.SONAME as run-time library.
> 
> 
>> If all the OP cares about is "make it work right now", then installing
>> the libaudit-dev package MIGHT be sufficient.  If it doesn't work, then
>> see below.
> 
> I doubt that. The -dev packages usually contain stuff which is needed
> for building binaries from source code. .h files and possibly an .a file
> for statical linking.
> 
> What is needed is the runtime package with the library SONAME version
> which the binary expects. ldd is supposed to tell which this is.

This would be accurate if the library is being loaded by ld.so-style
dynamic loading, but...

> (As you stated, Debian offers libaudit1 of source package "audit" with
> libaudit.so.1 and libaudit.so.1.0.0. It does not look like there are
> others.)
> 
> 
>> Ideally, the OP should contact the maintainer(s) of the program in
>> question, and try to get the program fixed so that it works properly.
> 
> Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> 
>> This tool is buggy since the .so symlink may point to any version 
>> of the library,
> 
> Before accusing the developer, one should make sure that the binary
> is indeed linking to .so without SONAME.
> This can be checked by
> 
>   ldd /...path.../...to.../binary-tool

...while I could be wrong, my interpretation of posts thus far is that
the program involved may be using dlopen()-style dynamic loading - and
more specifically dlopen()ing not libaudit.so.1 (or any other SONAME),
but the raw name libaudit.so, with no SONAME specified.

If that's correct, then the binary is not expecting any library SONAME
version, but rather the raw .so filename. That's clearly a buggy/broken
design, unless there's something we're/I'm missing, but it's something
that a developer might have wound up doing.

> Nicolas George wrote:
> 
>> Fixing this will require changing the source code of the broken
>> program, and then rebuilding it.
> 
> To be exacting:
> The bug would be in the build system, not in the source.

If the source is, in fact, dlopen()ing the .so name rather than the
other, then the bug could indeed be in the program source. (Though
there's room to argue that a program's build system integration *is*
part of its source.)

>> If the broken program was written against a different API version of
>> libaudit (something older, perhaps) then the changes might be nontrivial.
> 
> SONAME counting usually begins by 1. So i doubt that there is an older
> version.

Are you sure? On my system (recent but not current Debian testing):

for soname in `seq 0 12` ; do echo -n "${soname} " ; dlocate
"\.so\.${soname}$" | cut -d ':' -f 1 | sort -u | wc -l ; done
0   361
1   288
2   155
3   75
4   53
5   143
6   81
7   27
8   22
9   18
10  13
11  12
12  11

That should be a count of installed packages which ship at least one
library with the specified SONAME - and it sure looks to me as if a
significant fraction (in fact, a plurality) have a SONAME of 0.

-- 
   The Wanderer

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all
progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Missing links of libraries (*.so) on Debian 11

[Greg Wooledge]

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 03:39:41PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Before accusing the developer, one should make sure that the binary
> is indeed linking to .so without SONAME.
> This can be checked by
> 
>   ldd /...path.../...to.../binary-tool

> To be exacting:
> The bug would be in the build system, not in the source.

You're assuming that the program was dynamically linked against this
library.

I'm betting the program does a dlopen() and passes the wrong filename.

It would be quite useful if we could be told the ACTUAL DETAILS of the
problem.  The name of the program that's not working, and a terminal
paste of the errors that are obtained when trying to run it.

(Why do people HIDE this stuff??)

And yes, "ldd /path/to/the-program" would also be useful information.

Re: Missing links of libraries (*.so) on Debian 11

[Thomas Schmitt]

Hi,

Nicolas George wrote:
> The .so symbolic are not for running programs, they are for building
> them. For running, you only need the .so.vers links.

Yes, but at build time, the actually used SONAME is recorded in the binary.
ldd will show library.so.SONAME as run-time library.


> If all the OP cares about is "make it work right now", then installing
> the libaudit-dev package MIGHT be sufficient.  If it doesn't work, then
> see below.

I doubt that. The -dev packages usually contain stuff which is needed
for building binaries from source code. .h files and possibly an .a file
for statical linking.

What is needed is the runtime package with the library SONAME version
which the binary expects. ldd is supposed to tell which this is.
(As you stated, Debian offers libaudit1 of source package "audit" with
libaudit.so.1 and libaudit.so.1.0.0. It does not look like there are
others.)


> Ideally, the OP should contact the maintainer(s) of the program in
> question, and try to get the program fixed so that it works properly.

Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> This tool is buggy since the .so symlink may point to any version
> of the library,

Before accusing the developer, one should make sure that the binary
is indeed linking to .so without SONAME.
This can be checked by

  ldd /...path.../...to.../binary-tool


> and the various versions are not compatible to
> each other. The symlink with the supported version number (only
> one integer) must be used.

If the SONAME of a library changes, its Debian maintainer has to decide
whether this shall be reflected by creating a new package. Ideally the old
version will be supported for a while in parallel.
See readline5, readline6, and current readline (which has SONAME 8, i
wonder what happened to 7).


Nicolas George wrote:
> Fixing this will require changing the source code of the broken program,
> and then rebuilding it.

To be exacting:
The bug would be in the build system, not in the source.


> If the broken program was written against a different API version of
> libaudit (something older, perhaps) then the changes might be nontrivial.

SONAME counting usually begins by 1. So i doubt that there is an older
version.
But let's see what ldd reports.


Have a nice day :)

Thomas

Re: Missing links of libraries (*.so) on Debian 11

[Greg Wooledge]

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 11:15:33AM +, piorunz wrote:
> On 16/01/2023 10:33, Avtansh Gupta wrote:
> > */usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libaudit.so*
> > 
> > This is the missing .so file in debian11. This file was present on the
> > previous versions of Debian and other Linux distros as well.
> 
> Incorrect. You just did not installed it yet :)
> 
> $ lsb_release -d
> Description:Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
> 
> $ apt-file search libaudit.so
> libaudit-dev: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libaudit.so
> libaudit1: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libaudit.so.1
> libaudit1: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libaudit.so.1.0.0
> 
> Your file is there. Install first package and your program hopefully will
> start working again.

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 01:20:18PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2023-01-16 17:02:19 +0530, Anurag Aggarwal wrote:
> > The tool is looking for .so file to run, not for build.
> 
> This tool is buggy since the .so symlink may point to any version
> of the library, and the various versions are not compatible to
> each other. The symlink with the supported version number (only
> one integer) must be used.

Both of these responses are correct.  piorunz's response is technically
correct, and might even give a working result... or it might not.
There is indeed a libaudit.so file in the -dev package, but it's intended
to be used when building a program that uses the dynamically linked
libaudit, not for loading a library at runtime.

Vincent's response is correct, but doesn't really give a way forward.

If all the OP cares about is "make it work right now", then installing
the libaudit-dev package MIGHT be sufficient.  If it doesn't work, then
see below.

Ideally, the OP should contact the maintainer(s) of the program in
question, and try to get the program fixed so that it works properly.
It should either be dynamically linked against libaudit.so.1 (or whichever
version of libaudit was in use when it was built), or it should be
dynamically loading libaudit.so.1 (or libaudit.so.0 or whatever) instead
of libaudit.so.

Fixing this will require changing the source code of the broken program,
and then rebuilding it.  Rebuilding it will require libaudit-dev to be
installed.

If the broken program was written against a different API version of
libaudit (something older, perhaps) then the changes might be nontrivial.

Re: Missing links of libraries (*.so) on Debian 11

[Christoph Brinkhaus]

Am Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:28:59PM +0800 schrieb Ruiyang Peng:
> On 2023/1/16 18:33, Avtansh Gupta wrote:
> > Hello All,

Hello,

> > I recently noticed that some of the library soft links on my Debian 11
> > system are missing which were there in the previous versions. I have a
> > program loading one of these shared objects dynamically but is
> > failing as it is unable to locate the file.
> > 
> > */usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libaudit.so*
> > 
> > This is the missing .so file in debian11. This file was present on the
> > previous versions of Debian and other Linux distros as well.
> > 
> > A similar pattern is observed with the other files(*.so) in the same
> > folder.
> > 
> > Could someone let me know what the change is and what is the new
> > convention being used?
> > -- 
> > *Regards,*
> > 
> > *Avtansh Gupta*
> > *+91 8743068185*
> What about trying pkg-config? Maybe it can tell you where it is.
 
Please excuse the late reply, I think I have missed the first post(s).

apt-cache search libaudit|grep ^libaudit
libaudit-common - Dynamische Bibliothek für Sicherheitsprüfungen - gemeinsame 
Dateien
libaudit1 - Dynamische Bibliothek für Sicherheitsprüfungen
libaudit-dev - Header files and static library for security auditing

I guess you have to install some or all of the packages.

Kind regards,
Christoph
-- 
Ist die Katze gesund
schmeckt sie dem Hund.

Re: Missing links of libraries (*.so) on Debian 11

[Ruiyang Peng]

On 2023/1/16 18:33, Avtansh Gupta wrote:

Hello All,

I recently noticed that some of the library soft links on my Debian 11 
system are missing which were there in the previous versions. I have a 
program loading one of these shared objects dynamically but is 
failing as it is unable to locate the file.


*/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libaudit.so*

This is the missing .so file in debian11. This file was present on the 
previous versions of Debian and other Linux distros as well.


A similar pattern is observed with the other files(*.so) in the same 
folder.


Could someone let me know what the change is and what is the new 
convention being used?

--
*Regards,*

*Avtansh Gupta*
*+91 8743068185*

What about trying pkg-config? Maybe it can tell you where it is.

Re: Missing links of libraries (*.so) on Debian 11

[Vincent Lefevre]

On 2023-01-16 17:02:19 +0530, Anurag Aggarwal wrote:
> The tool is looking for .so file to run, not for build.

This tool is buggy since the .so symlink may point to any version
of the library, and the various versions are not compatible to
each other. The symlink with the supported version number (only
one integer) must be used.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre  - Web: 
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: 
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

Re: Missing links of libraries (*.so) on Debian 11

[Anurag Aggarwal]

>
>
>
> The .so symbolic are not for running programs, they are for building
> them. For running, you only need the .so.vers links.
>
> If a program dynamically loads directly a .so, it is probably bugged.
>

The tool is looking for .so file to run, not for build.

We need to dynamically load .so as it may not be present on all linux
distributions. For e.g. Ubuntu 16.04

On Ubuntu 20.04 and other distributions we have libaudit.so which symlinks
to libaudit.so.1.0.0.0

On Debian 11, we see a symlink named as libaudit.so.1 which links to
libaudit.so.1.0.0.0

-- 
Anurag Aggarwal

Re: Missing links of libraries (*.so) on Debian 11

[piorunz]

On 16/01/2023 10:33, Avtansh Gupta wrote:

*/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libaudit.so*

This is the missing .so file in debian11. This file was present on the 
previous versions of Debian and other Linux distros as well.


Incorrect. You just did not installed it yet :)

$ lsb_release -d
Description:Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)

$ apt-file search libaudit.so
libaudit-dev: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libaudit.so
libaudit1: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libaudit.so.1
libaudit1: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libaudit.so.1.0.0

Your file is there. Install first package and your program hopefully 
will start working again.


--
With kindest regards, Piotr.

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org/
⠈⠳⣄

Re: Missing links of libraries (*.so) on Debian 11

[Nicolas George]

Avtansh Gupta (12023-01-16):
> I recently noticed that some of the library soft links on my Debian 11
> system are missing which were there in the previous versions. I have a
> program loading one of these shared objects dynamically but is failing as
> it is unable to locate the file.
> 
> */usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libaudit.so*
> 
> This is the missing .so file in debian11. This file was present on the
> previous versions of Debian and other Linux distros as well.
> 
> A similar pattern is observed with the other files(*.so) in the same folder.
> 
> Could someone let me know what the change is and what is the new convention
> being used?

The .so symbolic are not for running programs, they are for building
them. For running, you only need the .so.vers links.

If a program dynamically loads directly a .so, it is probably bugged.

Regards,

-- 
  Nicolas George

Missing links of libraries (*.so) on Debian 11

[Avtansh Gupta]

Hello All,

I recently noticed that some of the library soft links on my Debian 11
system are missing which were there in the previous versions. I have a
program loading one of these shared objects dynamically but is failing as
it is unable to locate the file.

*/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libaudit.so*

This is the missing .so file in debian11. This file was present on the
previous versions of Debian and other Linux distros as well.

A similar pattern is observed with the other files(*.so) in the same folder.

Could someone let me know what the change is and what is the new convention
being used?
-- 
*Regards,*

*Avtansh Gupta*
*+91 8743068185*

Re: error while loading shared libraries: libmandb-2.9.4.so

[BERTRAND Joël]

NoSpam a écrit :
> Bonsoir, avec debian11, pour comparaison taille et droits
> 
> root@keewi:~# ls -al /usr/lib/man-db/libmandb*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 30712 19 févr.  2021
> /usr/lib/man-db/libmandb-2.9.4.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    17 19 févr.  2021 /usr/lib/man-db/libmandb.so
> -> libmandb-2.9.4.so

hilbert:[~] > ls -al /usr/lib/man-db/libmandb*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 30712 19 févr.  2021
/usr/lib/man-db/libmandb-2.9.4.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root17 19 févr.  2021 /usr/lib/man-db/libmandb.so
-> libmandb-2.9.4.so
hilbert:[~] >

La machine est diskless et je trouve dans les logs :
Sep  6 18:34:10 hilbert kernel: [549158.719413] nfs: RPC call returned
error 13
Sep  6 18:34:10 hilbert kernel: [549158.719418] nfs: RPC call returned
error 13
Sep  6 18:34:10 hilbert kernel: [549158.719423] nfs: RPC call returned
error 13
Sep  6 18:34:10 hilbert kernel: [549158.719427] nfs: RPC call returned
error 13
Sep  6 18:34:10 hilbert kernel: [549158.719432] nfs: RPC call returned
error 13
Sep  6 18:34:10 hilbert kernel: [549158.719439] nfs: RPC call returned
error 13
Sep  6 18:34:10 hilbert kernel: [549158.719444] nfs: RPC call returned
error 13
Sep  6 18:34:10 hilbert kernel: [549158.719449] nfs: RPC call returned
error 13
Sep  6 18:34:10 hilbert kernel: [549158.719453] nfs: RPC call returned
error 13
Sep  6 18:34:10 hilbert kernel: [549158.719459] nfs: RPC call returned
error 13
Sep  6 18:34:10 hilbert kernel: [549158.719463] nfs: RPC call returned
error 13
Sep  6 18:34:10 hilbert kernel: [549158.719468] nfs: RPC call returned
error 13
Sep  6 18:34:10 hilbert kernel: [549158.719472] nfs: RPC call returned
error 13
Sep  6 18:34:10 hilbert kernel: [549158.719477] nfs: RPC call returned
error 13
Sep  6 18:34:10 hilbert kernel: [549158.719482] nfs: RPC call returned
error 13
Sep  6 18:34:10 hilbert kernel: [549158.719487] nfs: RPC call returned
error 13
Sep  6 18:34:10 hilbert kernel: [549158.719492] nfs: RPC call returned
error 13
Sep  6 18:34:10 hilbert kernel: [549158.719497] nfs: RPC call returned
error 13
Sep  6 18:34:10 hilbert kernel: [549158.719501] nfs: RPC call returned
error 13

Je suppose que ça correspond à tous les essais que je vois dans strace.
En dehors de ce problème, la machine fonctionne parfaitement.

Bien cordialement,

JKB

Re: error while loading shared libraries: libmandb-2.9.4.so

[NoSpam]

Bonsoir, avec debian11, pour comparaison taille et droits

root@keewi:~# ls -al /usr/lib/man-db/libmandb*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 30712 19 févr.  2021 
/usr/lib/man-db/libmandb-2.9.4.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    17 19 févr.  2021 /usr/lib/man-db/libmandb.so 
-> libmandb-2.9.4.so



Le 06/09/2021 à 18:20, BERTRAND Joël a écrit :

Bonsoir à tous,

Depuis quelque temps, j'ai l'erreur suivante en appelant man :

Root hilbert:[/usr/lib] > man top
man: error while loading shared libraries: libmandb-2.9.4.so: cannot
open shared object file: Permission denied

Pourtant, toutes les bibliothèques semblent être là :

Root hilbert:[/usr/lib] > ldd /usr/bin/man
 linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7ffd118f2000)
 libmandb-2.9.4.so => /usr/lib/man-db/libmandb-2.9.4.so
(0x7fc5f3453000)
 libman-2.9.4.so => /usr/lib/man-db/libman-2.9.4.so
(0x7fc5f341)
 libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x7fc5f3399000)
 libpipeline.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpipeline.so.1
(0x7fc5f3388000)
 libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x7fc5f31c3000)
 libgdbm.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdbm.so.6
(0x7fc5f31b)
 libseccomp.so.2 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libseccomp.so.2
(0x7fc5f318b000)
 /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7fc5f347b000)
Root hilbert:[/usr/lib] >

J'ai réinstallé man-db sans obtenir de meilleur résultat.

Les droits me semblent corrects :

Root hilbert:[/usr/lib/man-db] > ls -al
total 420
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root   1024  6 sept. 18:03 .
drwxr-xr-x 141 root root  11264  6 sept. 15:48 ..
-rwxr-xr-x   1 root root  23232 19 févr.  2021 globbing
-rw-r--r--   1 root root 271168 19 févr.  2021 libman-2.9.4.so
-rw-r--r--   1 root root  30712 19 févr.  2021 libmandb-2.9.4.so
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root 17 19 févr.  2021 libmandb.so ->
libmandb-2.9.4.so
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root 15 19 févr.  2021 libman.so -> libman-2.9.4.so
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root 13 19 févr.  2021 man -> ../../bin/man
-rwxr-xr-x   1 root root  23392 19 févr.  2021 manconv
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root 15 19 févr.  2021 mandb -> ../../bin/mandb
-rwxr-xr-x   1 root root  56096 19 févr.  2021 zsoelim

et il s'agit bien d'une bibliothèque partagée :
Root hilbert:[/usr/lib/man-db] > file libmandb-2.9.4.so
libmandb-2.9.4.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), dynamically linked,
BuildID[sha1]=c20b1c94193b241e4e17834335605b9d68db1632, stripped

Si j'essaie de lancer man dans strace, je m'aperçois que le loader
cherche libmandb partout sauf dans /usr/lib/man-db :

Root hilbert:[/usr/lib/man-db] > strace man top 2>&1 | grep libmandb
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/man-db/tls/haswell/x86_64/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/man-db/tls/haswell/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/man-db/tls/x86_64/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/man-db/tls/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/man-db/haswell/x86_64/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/man-db/haswell/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/man-db/x86_64/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/man-db/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 EACCES (Permission non accordée)
openat(AT_FDCWD,
"/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/tls/haswell/x86_64/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/tls/haswell/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/tls/x86_64/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/tls/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD,
"/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/haswell/x86_64/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/haswell/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/x86_64/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 EACCES (Permission non accordée)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/lib/x86_64-linux

error while loading shared libraries: libmandb-2.9.4.so

[BERTRAND Joël]

Bonsoir à tous,

Depuis quelque temps, j'ai l'erreur suivante en appelant man :

Root hilbert:[/usr/lib] > man top
man: error while loading shared libraries: libmandb-2.9.4.so: cannot
open shared object file: Permission denied

Pourtant, toutes les bibliothèques semblent être là :

Root hilbert:[/usr/lib] > ldd /usr/bin/man
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7ffd118f2000)
libmandb-2.9.4.so => /usr/lib/man-db/libmandb-2.9.4.so
(0x7fc5f3453000)
libman-2.9.4.so => /usr/lib/man-db/libman-2.9.4.so
(0x7fc5f341)
libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x7fc5f3399000)
libpipeline.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpipeline.so.1
(0x7fc5f3388000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x7fc5f31c3000)
libgdbm.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdbm.so.6
(0x7fc5f31b)
libseccomp.so.2 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libseccomp.so.2
(0x7fc5f318b000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7fc5f347b000)
Root hilbert:[/usr/lib] >

J'ai réinstallé man-db sans obtenir de meilleur résultat.

Les droits me semblent corrects :

Root hilbert:[/usr/lib/man-db] > ls -al
total 420
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root   1024  6 sept. 18:03 .
drwxr-xr-x 141 root root  11264  6 sept. 15:48 ..
-rwxr-xr-x   1 root root  23232 19 févr.  2021 globbing
-rw-r--r--   1 root root 271168 19 févr.  2021 libman-2.9.4.so
-rw-r--r--   1 root root  30712 19 févr.  2021 libmandb-2.9.4.so
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root 17 19 févr.  2021 libmandb.so ->
libmandb-2.9.4.so
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root 15 19 févr.  2021 libman.so -> libman-2.9.4.so
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root 13 19 févr.  2021 man -> ../../bin/man
-rwxr-xr-x   1 root root  23392 19 févr.  2021 manconv
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root 15 19 févr.  2021 mandb -> ../../bin/mandb
-rwxr-xr-x   1 root root  56096 19 févr.  2021 zsoelim

et il s'agit bien d'une bibliothèque partagée :
Root hilbert:[/usr/lib/man-db] > file libmandb-2.9.4.so
libmandb-2.9.4.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), dynamically linked,
BuildID[sha1]=c20b1c94193b241e4e17834335605b9d68db1632, stripped

Si j'essaie de lancer man dans strace, je m'aperçois que le loader
cherche libmandb partout sauf dans /usr/lib/man-db :

Root hilbert:[/usr/lib/man-db] > strace man top 2>&1 | grep libmandb
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/man-db/tls/haswell/x86_64/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/man-db/tls/haswell/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/man-db/tls/x86_64/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/man-db/tls/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/man-db/haswell/x86_64/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/man-db/haswell/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/man-db/x86_64/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/man-db/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 EACCES (Permission non accordée)
openat(AT_FDCWD,
"/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/tls/haswell/x86_64/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/tls/haswell/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/tls/x86_64/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/tls/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD,
"/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/haswell/x86_64/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/haswell/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/x86_64/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 EACCES (Permission non accordée)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD,
"/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/tls/haswell/x86_64/libmandb-2.9.4.so",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type)
openat(AT_FDCWD,
"/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/tls/haswell/libmandb-2.9.4.so",

Re: [Kiwix-developer] Any preferrably java libraries, tutorials, ... about working with zim files? ...

[Andrew M.A. Cater]

On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 11:44:12AM +0100, Albretch Mueller wrote:
>  I could not find the zim-tools utility on the debian repository:
>  https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=zim-tools
>  https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=zim
>  and I can't use git since I do not connect my work computer to the Internet.
>  Is there a debian package or tar ball somewhere which could be
> installed locally?
>  Thanks
> 
zim tools is in Buster backports - 

https://packages.debian.org/buster-backports/zim-tools

Zim tools Debian into Google  found this one for me: packages.debian.org is a 
good place to find what's actually packaged and a search on zim-tools also 
found this for me just now - maybe you had a glitch somewhere? -
 https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=names=zim-tools

Hope this helps,

Andy C



> 
> On 12/12/20, Emmanuel Engelhart  wrote:
> > On 12.12.20 10:42, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> >>  based on what I have read on:
> >>
> >>  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZIM_(file_format)
> >>
> >>  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils
> >>
> >>  the zim file format is not exactly based on the zip one,
> >
> > Not at all.
> >
> >> which also
> >> includes archiving. Say you would like to extract just one file to
> >> work on it, without decompressing the whole file.
> >>
> >>  How could you do that?
> >>
> > With zimdump in the zim-tools https://github.com/openzim/libzim/issues/397
> >
> > Or you can use one of the binding node/python.
> >
> > Emmanuel
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Kiwix - Wikipedia Offline & more
> > * Web: https://kiwix.org/
> > * Twitter: https://twitter.com/KiwixOffline
> > * Wiki: https://wiki.kiwix.org/
> >
> >
> 

Re: [Kiwix-developer] Any preferrably java libraries, tutorials, ... about working with zim files? ...

[Albretch Mueller]

 I could not find the zim-tools utility on the debian repository:
 https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=zim-tools
 https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=zim
 and I can't use git since I do not connect my work computer to the Internet.
 Is there a debian package or tar ball somewhere which could be
installed locally?
 Thanks


On 12/12/20, Emmanuel Engelhart  wrote:
> On 12.12.20 10:42, Albretch Mueller wrote:
>>  based on what I have read on:
>>
>>  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZIM_(file_format)
>>
>>  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils
>>
>>  the zim file format is not exactly based on the zip one,
>
> Not at all.
>
>> which also
>> includes archiving. Say you would like to extract just one file to
>> work on it, without decompressing the whole file.
>>
>>  How could you do that?
>>
> With zimdump in the zim-tools https://github.com/openzim/libzim/issues/397
>
> Or you can use one of the binding node/python.
>
> Emmanuel
>
>
>
> --
> Kiwix - Wikipedia Offline & more
> * Web: https://kiwix.org/
> * Twitter: https://twitter.com/KiwixOffline
> * Wiki: https://wiki.kiwix.org/
>
>

Re: Looking for advice on tools (or libraries) for unsupervised, bulk symmetric encryption/decryption of files

[John Crawley]

On 13/01/2019 12.46, Celejar wrote:

On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 21:45:57 +

I believe that the most commonly used software for file level
encryption is EncFS. I haven't really used it much, and can't speak to
its long term stablity.


EncFS should not be used for any new file encryption project, IMHO.
There was the following report in 2014:
https://defuse.ca/audits/encfs.htm
This is referenced in the NEWS file in the EncFS package
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/encfs/blob/debian/sid/debian/NEWS

Both the report and the NEWS file are 5 years sold so I am not sure of
its current status but I'd want to seek positive assurance.


Huh - good to know. But I was wondering, along similar (but less
informed) lines, how good some of the other suggestions were, e.g.
ccrypt. I know very little about ccrypt, but has it even been
audited at all? Is it sufficiently widely used that any vulnerablities
or misimplementations of the sort discovered by the EncFS audit would
have been looked for or turned up?


Looking at encfs, gocryptfs showed up, which claims "This project was  
inspired by EncFS and strives to fix its security issues while providing  
good performance":

https://packages.debian.org/stretch/gocryptfs
https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs

No personal experience (yet) of using it though.
--
John

Re: Looking for advice on tools (or libraries) for unsupervised, bulk symmetric encryption/decryption of files

[Celejar]

On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 21:45:57 +
Jonathan Dowland  wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 10:18:47PM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> >The standard encryption technology for linux is LUKS. It works on the
> >block device level, not the file level.
> 
> LUKS would be no good if the user wants to move/copy/share the encrypted
> files, encrypted, elsewhere: they didn't say so explicitly but that's
> the impression I got reading their message.

You're probably right; I realized after I wrote my reply (and read some
of the other replies) that my solutions likely weren't really what the
OP was looking for.

> >I believe that the most commonly used software for file level
> >encryption is EncFS. I haven't really used it much, and can't speak to
> >its long term stablity.
> 
> EncFS should not be used for any new file encryption project, IMHO.
> There was the following report in 2014:
> https://defuse.ca/audits/encfs.htm
> This is referenced in the NEWS file in the EncFS package
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/encfs/blob/debian/sid/debian/NEWS
> 
> Both the report and the NEWS file are 5 years sold so I am not sure of
> its current status but I'd want to seek positive assurance.

Huh - good to know. But I was wondering, along similar (but less
informed) lines, how good some of the other suggestions were, e.g.
ccrypt. I know very little about ccrypt, but has it even been
audited at all? Is it sufficiently widely used that any vulnerablities
or misimplementations of the sort discovered by the EncFS audit would
have been looked for or turned up?

Celejar

Re: Looking for advice on tools (or libraries) for unsupervised, bulk symmetric encryption/decryption of files

[Stefan Pietsch]

On 11.01.19 22:45, Jonathan Dowland wrote:

> EncFS should not be used for any new file encryption project, IMHO.
> There was the following report in 2014:
> https://defuse.ca/audits/encfs.htm
> This is referenced in the NEWS file in the EncFS package
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/encfs/blob/debian/sid/debian/NEWS
> 
> Both the report and the NEWS file are 5 years sold so I am not sure of
> its current status but I'd want to seek positive assurance.

See GitHub issue #314 that lists the open security issues in EncFS:
https://github.com/vgough/encfs/issues/314

Re: Looking for advice on tools (or libraries) for unsupervised, bulk symmetric encryption/decryption of files

[Jonathan Dowland]

On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 10:18:47PM -0500, Celejar wrote:

The standard encryption technology for linux is LUKS. It works on the
block device level, not the file level.


LUKS would be no good if the user wants to move/copy/share the encrypted
files, encrypted, elsewhere: they didn't say so explicitly but that's
the impression I got reading their message.


I believe that the most commonly used software for file level
encryption is EncFS. I haven't really used it much, and can't speak to
its long term stablity.


EncFS should not be used for any new file encryption project, IMHO.
There was the following report in 2014:
https://defuse.ca/audits/encfs.htm
This is referenced in the NEWS file in the EncFS package
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/encfs/blob/debian/sid/debian/NEWS

Both the report and the NEWS file are 5 years sold so I am not sure of
its current status but I'd want to seek positive assurance.

--

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.

Re: Looking for advice on tools (or libraries) for unsupervised, bulk symmetric encryption/decryption of files

[Ben Caradoc-Davies]

On 10/01/2019 03:05, Kynn Jones wrote:

The only encryption tool I have used for encrypting files on my hard drive
is gpg2, which I have used for small, interactive encryption tasks
(half-dozen files, at most).
Therefore, my initial attempt was to use gpg2 for this new bulk-encryption
task, but I found myself constantly fighting with it, and finally had to
recognize that I was trying to use gpg2 for something it is not primarily
designed for.  (I am also a bit concerned with gpg2's future stability.
AFAICT, It's design has varied significantly over the years, and as a
result there's a lot of confusion on its use.  That has been my experience,
in any case.)


I use a pipe with gpg2 as one component for symmetric encryption:

gpg --batch --symmetric --cipher-algo AES256 --s2k-digest-algo SHA512 
--compress-algo none --passphrase-file $PASSPHRASE_FILE


My pipe input is usually a tar file gzipped with pigz for parallel 
compression, hence the "--compress-algo none". I then add another "pigz 
-0" wrapper to get a cryptographically weak checksum to allow testing 
for media failures without the passphrase. I like tar because it 
preserves file metadata and filesystem structure and is a very stable 
format. Other formats may be better for random access.


Recently I used gpg2 to decrypt files that were encrypted over 15 years 
ago; note that these were much smaller files and a simpler invocation of 
gpg1 (the then default cipher was CAST5 IIRC). The gpg file format seems 
well-documented and stable. Regular decryption tests are prudent to 
catch problems after gpg upgrade. Yes, the new interactive predilections 
of gpg2 were a pain at first when compared to gpg1, but "--batch" and 
"--passphrase-file" seem sufficient for batch symmetric encryption, if 
you do not mind your passphrase being in plain text on your filesystem.


Kind regards,

--
Ben Caradoc-Davies 
Director
Transient Software Limited 
New Zealand

Re: Looking for advice on tools (or libraries) for unsupervised, bulk symmetric encryption/decryption of files

[Celejar]

On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 09:05:32 -0500
Kynn Jones  wrote:

> I am looking for software to symmetric-encrypt large numbers of files on
> disk (terabytes' worth of data), and would appreciate some advice.
> 
> My basic requirements:
> 
>- It should be open source and no-cost (though, since I'm asking this
>question here, this goes without saying);
>- I should be able to program scripts (shell, Python, Perl, or Ruby) to
>run this software without human intervention; this rules out tools that are
>designed for interactive use.
>- It should be stable; I should be able to decrypt encrypted files that
>were encrypted several years earlier; (how much earlier?  hard to say;
>let's say 10 years, as a rough ballpark)
> 
> In addition, the following would be nice:
> 
>- good documentation;
>- good performance;
>- bindings for a high-level language (preferably Python).

The standard encryption technology for linux is LUKS. It works on the
block device level, not the file level. [I may be using the terminology
inaccurately.] You'll find the best compatibility, stability, and
documentation with LUKS, but you don't use it to create encrypted
copies of files - rather, you create a LUKS encrypted device, and
copy / move your files there. The LUKS tools (cryptsetup) are only
necessary for the creation and management of the encrypted volume; once
it's set up, you use the ondinary filesystem tools (cp, mv, ls, etc.)
to access files and move them to and from encrypted storage.

I believe that the most commonly used software for file level
encryption is EncFS. I haven't really used it much, and can't speak to
its long term stablity.



Celejar

Re: Looking for advice on tools (or libraries) for unsupervised, bulk symmetric encryption/decryption of files

[Linux-Fan]

Kynn Jones writes:

I am looking for software to symmetric-encrypt large numbers of files on disk  
(terabytes' worth of data), and would appreciate some advice.


My basic requirements:

• It should be open source and no-cost (though, since I'm asking this  
question here, this goes without saying);


• I should be able to program scripts (shell, Python, Perl, or Ruby) to run  
this software without human intervention; this rules out tools that are  
designed for interactive use.


• It should be stable; I should be able to decrypt encrypted files that were  
encrypted several years earlier; (how much earlier?  hard to say; let's say  
10 years, as a rough ballpark)

In addition, the following would be nice:

• good documentation;

• good performance;

• bindings for a high-level language (preferably Python).

The only encryption tool I have used for encrypting files on my hard drive is  
gpg2, which I have used for small, interactive encryption tasks (half-dozen  
files, at most).


[...]


What Debian packages would you recommend?


I actually tend to use 7-Zip for symmetric file encryption a lot because it  
ensures cross-platform compatibility and many users have 7-Zip already  
installed (I am always afraid that one day decryption software might not be  
available because then data would be close to being lost). The Debian  
package is `p7zip-full`.


Another program which I like is AESCrypt. Unfortunately it seems it is not  
included in Debian, but one might be able to install it via PIP (I have only  
ever used the Java and C version). I have actually read the Java  
implementation (which is also available as a very minimalistic commandline  
utility) and found the code understandable which is always a bonus when it  
comes to security :) Additionally, it was simple to adapt the library to  
provide a slightly different API and the result is still compatible with the  
AESCrypt commandline. As a result, you can use the API to automatically  
process data and the commandline utility to manually extract the data should  
something go wrong with the automatism. AESCrypt also seems to have Python  
bindings (but I have not used them). See https://www.aescrypt.com.


HTH
Linux-Fan


pgpXbZBrkpsDQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Looking for advice on tools (or libraries) for unsupervised, bulk symmetric encryption/decryption of files

[David Christensen]

On 1/9/19 6:05 AM, Kynn Jones wrote:

I am looking for software to symmetric-encrypt large numbers of files on
disk (terabytes' worth of data), and would appreciate some advice.

My basic requirements:

- It should be open source and no-cost (though, since I'm asking this
question here, this goes without saying);
- I should be able to program scripts (shell, Python, Perl, or Ruby) to
run this software without human intervention; this rules out tools that are
designed for interactive use.
- It should be stable; I should be able to decrypt encrypted files that
were encrypted several years earlier; (how much earlier?  hard to say;
let's say 10 years, as a rough ballpark)

In addition, the following would be nice:

- good documentation;
- good performance;
- bindings for a high-level language (preferably Python).

The only encryption tool I have used for encrypting files on my hard drive
is gpg2, which I have used for small, interactive encryption tasks
(half-dozen files, at most).

Therefore, my initial attempt was to use gpg2 for this new bulk-encryption
task, but I found myself constantly fighting with it, and finally had to
recognize that I was trying to use gpg2 for something it is not primarily
designed for.  (I am also a bit concerned with gpg2's future stability.
AFAICT, It's design has varied significantly over the years, and as a
result there's a lot of confusion on its use.  That has been my experience,
in any case.)

So I am back to square one.

I stress that I am interested only in symmetric encryption.  The issues
that asymmetric encryption addresses are not at all part of the problem I
am dealing with, and therefore I don't want to have to deal with the
complexities of asymmetric encryption.

What Debian packages would you recommend?

Many thanks in advance!

kj


I use the ccrypt(1) suite for encrypting files using only a password 
(e.g. not PKI).  I wrap the CLI tools with Bash and/or Perl scripts to 
automate repetitive tasks (Python, Ruby, and other scripting languages 
should also work).  It is available via the Debian package 'ccrypt'.


http://ccrypt.sourceforge.net/


David

Looking for advice on tools (or libraries) for unsupervised, bulk symmetric encryption/decryption of files

[Kynn Jones]

I am looking for software to symmetric-encrypt large numbers of files on
disk (terabytes' worth of data), and would appreciate some advice.

My basic requirements:

   - It should be open source and no-cost (though, since I'm asking this
   question here, this goes without saying);
   - I should be able to program scripts (shell, Python, Perl, or Ruby) to
   run this software without human intervention; this rules out tools that are
   designed for interactive use.
   - It should be stable; I should be able to decrypt encrypted files that
   were encrypted several years earlier; (how much earlier?  hard to say;
   let's say 10 years, as a rough ballpark)

In addition, the following would be nice:

   - good documentation;
   - good performance;
   - bindings for a high-level language (preferably Python).

The only encryption tool I have used for encrypting files on my hard drive
is gpg2, which I have used for small, interactive encryption tasks
(half-dozen files, at most).

Therefore, my initial attempt was to use gpg2 for this new bulk-encryption
task, but I found myself constantly fighting with it, and finally had to
recognize that I was trying to use gpg2 for something it is not primarily
designed for.  (I am also a bit concerned with gpg2's future stability.
AFAICT, It's design has varied significantly over the years, and as a
result there's a lot of confusion on its use.  That has been my experience,
in any case.)

So I am back to square one.

I stress that I am interested only in symmetric encryption.  The issues
that asymmetric encryption addresses are not at all part of the problem I
am dealing with, and therefore I don't want to have to deal with the
complexities of asymmetric encryption.

What Debian packages would you recommend?

Many thanks in advance!

kj

Re: error while loading shared libraries: libQt5Core.so.5

[El Aprendiz]

El 26 de abril de 2018, 8:57, OddieX <odd...@gmail.com> escribió:

> 2018-04-26 3:48 GMT-03:00 El Aprendiz <dc.lis...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >
> > El 26 de abril de 2018, 8:33, OddieX <odd...@gmail.com> escribió:
> >>
> >> El día 26 de abril de 2018, 3:32, OddieX <odd...@gmail.com> escribió:
> >> > El día 26 de abril de 2018, 3:27, El Aprendiz <dc.lis...@gmail.com>
> >> > escribió:
> >> >> He hecho una actualización al sistema (testing) y después de hacerla,
> >> >> virtualbox y owncloud no me arrancan. Ambos me sacan el mensaje de
> >> >> error:
> >> >>
> >> >> "error while loading shared libraries: libQt5Core.so.5: cannot open
> >> >> shared
> >> >> object file: No such file or directory"
> >> >>
> >> >> y veo que tengo instalado libqt5core5a
> >> >>
> >> >> ¿alguien tiene idea de que puede estar fallando?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > Intenta cargar la libreria con LD_LIBRATY_PATH=/donde/esta/
> la/libreria
> >> > a ver si te la levanta
> >>
> >> Perdon, antes hacele un ldd a la libreria en cuestion a ver si te
> >> falta alguna dependencia!
> >
> >
> > $ ldd /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5
> > linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7fff589fe000)
> > libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
> > (0x7ff687cdc000)
> > libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1
> (0x7ff687ac2000)
> > libicui18n.so.57 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libicui18n.so.57
> > (0x7ff68764e000)
> > libicuuc.so.57 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libicuuc.so.57
> > (0x7ff6872a9000)
> > libpcre2-16.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre2-16.so.0
> > (0x7ff687032000)
> > libdouble-conversion.so.1 =>
> > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdouble-conversion.so.1 (0x7ff686e21000)
> > libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2
> (0x7ff686c1b000)
> > libglib-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
> > (0x7ff686905000)
> > libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
> > (0x7ff68658)
> > libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6
> (0x7ff6861ed000)
> > libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
> > (0x7ff685fd5000)
> > libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
> (0x7ff685c1b000)
> > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7ff68861f000)
> > libicudata.so.57 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libicudata.so.57
> > (0x7ff68419c000)
> > libpcre.so.3 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.3
> > (0x7ff683f2a000)
> >
> > $ LD_LIBRATY_PATH=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/
> >
> > $ owncloud
> > owncloud: error while loading shared libraries: libQt5Core.so.5: cannot
> open
> > shared object file: No such file or directory
> >
> > Gracias OddieX, pero sigue sin funcionar
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Costas
> >
> >
>
>
> Escribi mal y creo que no te has dado cuenta! seria asi:
>
> Pone esto:
>
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/usr/local/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
> owncloud
>


$ ldd /usr/bin/owncloud
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7fff0156)
libQt5DBus.so.5 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5DBus.so.5
(0x7f3a5cda6000)
libQt5WebKitWidgets.so.5 =>
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5WebKitWidgets.so.5 (0x7f3a5cb5f000)
libQt5WebKit.so.5 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5WebKit.so.5
(0x7f3a59be1000)
libQt5Xml.so.5 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Xml.so.5
(0x7f3a599a5000)
libowncloudsync.so.0 =>
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libowncloudsync.so.0 (0x7f3a5967c000)
libQt5Widgets.so.5 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Widgets.so.5
(0x7f3a58e2c000)
libQt5Gui.so.5 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Gui.so.5
(0x7f3a5869)
libQt5Network.so.5 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Network.so.5
(0x7f3a5830)
libocsync.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/owncloud/libocsync.so.0
(0x7f3a580ae000)
libQt5Core.so.5 => not found


me llama la atención que en la ruta /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ si encuentra
librerías pero no es capaz de encontrar la libQtCore.so.5

si veo la ruta, veo que el fichero si esta

/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu$ ls -lha libQt5Core.so.5*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   20 abr  7 21:35 libQt5Core.so.5 ->
libQt5Core.so.5.10.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   20 abr  7 21:35 libQt5Core.so.5.10 ->
libQt5Core.so.5.10.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5,0M abr  7 21:35 libQt5Core.so.5.10.1



-- 
Daniel Costas

Re: error while loading shared libraries: libQt5Core.so.5

[OddieX]

2018-04-26 3:48 GMT-03:00 El Aprendiz <dc.lis...@gmail.com>:
>
>
> El 26 de abril de 2018, 8:33, OddieX <odd...@gmail.com> escribió:
>>
>> El día 26 de abril de 2018, 3:32, OddieX <odd...@gmail.com> escribió:
>> > El día 26 de abril de 2018, 3:27, El Aprendiz <dc.lis...@gmail.com>
>> > escribió:
>> >> He hecho una actualización al sistema (testing) y después de hacerla,
>> >> virtualbox y owncloud no me arrancan. Ambos me sacan el mensaje de
>> >> error:
>> >>
>> >> "error while loading shared libraries: libQt5Core.so.5: cannot open
>> >> shared
>> >> object file: No such file or directory"
>> >>
>> >> y veo que tengo instalado libqt5core5a
>> >>
>> >> ¿alguien tiene idea de que puede estar fallando?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> > Intenta cargar la libreria con LD_LIBRATY_PATH=/donde/esta/la/libreria
>> > a ver si te la levanta
>>
>> Perdon, antes hacele un ldd a la libreria en cuestion a ver si te
>> falta alguna dependencia!
>
>
> $ ldd /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5
> linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7fff589fe000)
> libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
> (0x7ff687cdc000)
> libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x7ff687ac2000)
> libicui18n.so.57 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libicui18n.so.57
> (0x7ff68764e000)
> libicuuc.so.57 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libicuuc.so.57
> (0x7ff6872a9000)
> libpcre2-16.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre2-16.so.0
> (0x7ff687032000)
> libdouble-conversion.so.1 =>
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdouble-conversion.so.1 (0x7ff686e21000)
> libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x7ff686c1b000)
> libglib-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
> (0x7ff686905000)
> libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
> (0x7ff68658)
> libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x7ff6861ed000)
> libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
> (0x7ff685fd5000)
> libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x7ff685c1b000)
> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7ff68861f000)
> libicudata.so.57 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libicudata.so.57
> (0x7ff68419c000)
> libpcre.so.3 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.3
> (0x7ff683f2a000)
>
> $ LD_LIBRATY_PATH=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/
>
> $ owncloud
> owncloud: error while loading shared libraries: libQt5Core.so.5: cannot open
> shared object file: No such file or directory
>
> Gracias OddieX, pero sigue sin funcionar
>
> --
> Daniel Costas
>
>


Escribi mal y creo que no te has dado cuenta! seria asi:

Pone esto:

LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/usr/local/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
owncloud

Re: error while loading shared libraries: libQt5Core.so.5

[El Aprendiz]

El 26 de abril de 2018, 8:33, OddieX <odd...@gmail.com> escribió:

> El día 26 de abril de 2018, 3:32, OddieX <odd...@gmail.com> escribió:
> > El día 26 de abril de 2018, 3:27, El Aprendiz <dc.lis...@gmail.com>
> escribió:
> >> He hecho una actualización al sistema (testing) y después de hacerla,
> >> virtualbox y owncloud no me arrancan. Ambos me sacan el mensaje de
> error:
> >>
> >> "error while loading shared libraries: libQt5Core.so.5: cannot open
> shared
> >> object file: No such file or directory"
> >>
> >> y veo que tengo instalado libqt5core5a
> >>
> >> ¿alguien tiene idea de que puede estar fallando?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > Intenta cargar la libreria con LD_LIBRATY_PATH=/donde/esta/la/libreria
> > a ver si te la levanta
>
> Perdon, antes hacele un ldd a la libreria en cuestion a ver si te
> falta alguna dependencia!
>

$ ldd /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7fff589fe000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
(0x7ff687cdc000)
libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x7ff687ac2000)
libicui18n.so.57 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libicui18n.so.57
(0x7ff68764e000)
libicuuc.so.57 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libicuuc.so.57
(0x7ff6872a9000)
libpcre2-16.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre2-16.so.0
(0x7ff687032000)
libdouble-conversion.so.1 =>
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdouble-conversion.so.1 (0x7ff686e21000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x7ff686c1b000)
libglib-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
(0x7ff686905000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
(0x7ff68658)
libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x7ff6861ed000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
(0x7ff685fd5000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x7ff685c1b000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7ff68861f000)
libicudata.so.57 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libicudata.so.57
(0x7ff68419c000)
libpcre.so.3 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.3
(0x7ff683f2a000)

$ LD_LIBRATY_PATH=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/

$ owncloud
owncloud: error while loading shared libraries: libQt5Core.so.5: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory

Gracias OddieX, pero sigue sin funcionar

-- 
Daniel Costas

Re: error while loading shared libraries: libQt5Core.so.5

[OddieX]

El día 26 de abril de 2018, 3:32, OddieX <odd...@gmail.com> escribió:
> El día 26 de abril de 2018, 3:27, El Aprendiz <dc.lis...@gmail.com> escribió:
>> He hecho una actualización al sistema (testing) y después de hacerla,
>> virtualbox y owncloud no me arrancan. Ambos me sacan el mensaje de error:
>>
>> "error while loading shared libraries: libQt5Core.so.5: cannot open shared
>> object file: No such file or directory"
>>
>> y veo que tengo instalado libqt5core5a
>>
>> ¿alguien tiene idea de que puede estar fallando?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Costas
>>
>>
> Intenta cargar la libreria con LD_LIBRATY_PATH=/donde/esta/la/libreria
> a ver si te la levanta

Perdon, antes hacele un ldd a la libreria en cuestion a ver si te
falta alguna dependencia!

Re: error while loading shared libraries: libQt5Core.so.5

[OddieX]

El día 26 de abril de 2018, 3:27, El Aprendiz <dc.lis...@gmail.com> escribió:
> He hecho una actualización al sistema (testing) y después de hacerla,
> virtualbox y owncloud no me arrancan. Ambos me sacan el mensaje de error:
>
> "error while loading shared libraries: libQt5Core.so.5: cannot open shared
> object file: No such file or directory"
>
> y veo que tengo instalado libqt5core5a
>
> ¿alguien tiene idea de que puede estar fallando?
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Costas
>
>
Intenta cargar la libreria con LD_LIBRATY_PATH=/donde/esta/la/libreria
a ver si te la levanta

error while loading shared libraries: libQt5Core.so.5

[El Aprendiz]

He hecho una actualización al sistema (testing) y después de hacerla,
virtualbox y owncloud no me arrancan. Ambos me sacan el mensaje de error:

"error while loading shared libraries: libQt5Core.so.5: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory"

y veo que tengo instalado libqt5core5a

¿alguien tiene idea de que puede estar fallando?



-- 
Daniel Costas

Problem with upgrading graphics libraries

[Marek Rusinowski]

Hi,

For the last few weeks I'm unable to upgrade graphics libraries on my
system. Unfortunately, I don't know which packages are the problem.

I have integrated intel and dedicated nvidia gpus. It looks like
exactly the same problem described in this reddit thread: https://www.r
eddit.com/r/debian/comments/76vsfl/new_mesa_packages_result_in_unmet_de
pendencies/ Doing apt-get dist-upgrade will result in huge amount of
packages removed (https://pastebin.com/kYvR6YNx). In the reddit thread,
the author suggested that installing libegl1 libgl1 libglx-mesa0
libglx0 solved the issue for him. For me, the set of packages to
install is libegl1 libglx0 libopengl0 (https://pastebin.com/gENyUakQ).

Unfortunately, after doing that and upgrading the rest of packages,
intel gpu stopped working so I rolled back to the filesystem snapshot
before the upgrade. After comparing Xorg logs from before (https://past
ebin.com/PscEgpDq) and after (https://pastebin.com/mciXYcNe) the
problem seems to be:

(EE) modeset(0): eglGetDisplay() failed
(EE) modeset(0): glamor initialization failed
(...)
(II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable
(EE) AIGLX: reverting to software rendering

Any hints how to solve the issues? Where should I report it?

Thank you,
Marek

Installing LXDE marks 2 libraries as _manually installed_; why?

[Mario Castelán Castro]

Hello.

In Debian 8, after having installed a text-only system with the LXDE CD 
(8.2.0), and proceeding to install LXDE with aptitude, I noticed that 
"libpango1.0-0" and "libpangox-1.0-0" get marked as "Packages to be 
installed" instead of "Packages being automatically installed to satisfy 
dependencies".


I tracked the dependency chain and found that "libvte9" is responsible 
for this. To test it, I actually installed "libvte9" with both aptitude 
and with apt-get; in both cases, the aforesaid 2 libraries get 
registered as "manually installed". I tested this within a virtual 
machine and started with a clean install of the text-only system both times.


I think that these libraries should have been marked as "automatically 
installed" (like all other libraries that get installed as dependencies) 
since I didn't request them specifically. Why I am not getting the 
expected result? Is this a bug, that I should report?. Is it safe to 
mark them as automatically installed in my system?


Regards and thanks in advance.

Installing LXDE marks 2 libraries as _manually installed_; why?

[Mario Castelán Castro]

Hello.

In Debian 8, after having installed a text-only system with the LXDE CD 
(8.2.0), and proceeding to install LXDE with aptitude, I noticed that 
"libpango1.0-0" and "libpangox-1.0-0" get marked as "Packages to be 
installed" instead of "Packages being automatically installed to satisfy 
dependencies".


I tracked the dependency chain and found that "libvte9" is responsible 
for this. To test it, I actually installed "libvte9" with both aptitude 
and with apt-get; in both cases, the aforesaid 2 libraries get 
registered as "manually installed". I tested this within a virtual 
machine and started with a clean install of the text-only system both times.


I think that these libraries should have been marked as "automatically 
installed" (like all other libraries that get installed as dependencies) 
since I didn't request them specifically. Why I am not getting the 
expected result? Is this a bug, that I should report?. Is it safe to 
mark them as automatically installed in my system?


Regards and thanks in advance.

Re: tc / iproute2 shared libraries missing - jessie

[Podrigal, Aron]

After looking a bit more, it looks to me that this is what was happening
(correct me if I'm wrong). looks like those filter types are now statically
linked into tc. But if the parameters given to  tc could not be understood
using any statically linked algorithms, tc tries to dynamically load other
libraries matching matched by keywords within the command line arguments.
However I still do not understand why my command is not valid.

On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Podrigal, Aron ar...@guaranteedplus.com
wrote:

 I am trying to do traffic shaping using tc, however I can't add any
 filters and am getting this  generic error message

 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
 We have an error talking to the kernel


 A simple strace shows that the problem is that it can't find the required
 filter type libraries in /usr/lib/tc/filter_type

 socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW|SOCK_CLOEXEC, NETLINK_ROUTE) = 3
 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF, [32768], 4) = 0
 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF, [1048576], 4) = 0
 bind(3, {sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=}, 12) = 0
 getsockname(3, {sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=13737, groups=}, [12]) =
 0
 open(/usr/lib/tc//f_u32.so, O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such
 file or directory)
 sendto(3,
 (\0\0\0\22\0\1\3\6\267\217U\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0...,
 40, 0, NULL, 0) = 40
 recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=},
 msg_iov(1)=[{l\4\0\0\20\0\2\0\6\267\217U\2515\0\0\0\0\4\3\1\0\0\0I\0\1\0\0\0\0\0...,
 16384}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 3420
 recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=},
 msg_iov(1)=[{\24\0\0\0\3\0\2\0\6\267\217U\2515\0\0\0\0\0\0, 16384}],
 msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 20
 sendmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=},
 msg_iov(1)=[{,\0\0\0,\0\5\6\7\267\217U\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\377\377\377\377...,
 44}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 44
 recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=},
 msg_iov(1)=[{@\0\0\0\2\0\0\0\7\267\217U\2515\0\0\352\377\377\377,\0\0\0,\0\5\6\7\267\217U...,
 16384}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 64
 write(2, RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argum..., 36RTNETLINK answers:
 Invalid argument
 ) = 36
 write(2, We have an error talking to the ..., 39We have an error talking
 to the kernel
 ) = 39
 close(3)= 0
 exit_group(2)   = ?
 +++ exited with 2 +++


 Iv'e tried searching for any related packages that would provide it, but
 no success. Can anyone point out if there was any changes to file
 locations? or if this is a bug?


 Thank you.

 --
 Aron Podrigal
 -
 //Be happy :-)




-- 
Aron Podrigal
-
//Be happy :-)

tc / iproute2 shared libraries missing - jessie

[Podrigal, Aron]

I am trying to do traffic shaping using tc, however I can't add any filters
and am getting this  generic error message

RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
We have an error talking to the kernel


A simple strace shows that the problem is that it can't find the required
filter type libraries in /usr/lib/tc/filter_type

socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW|SOCK_CLOEXEC, NETLINK_ROUTE) = 3
setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF, [32768], 4) = 0
setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF, [1048576], 4) = 0
bind(3, {sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=}, 12) = 0
getsockname(3, {sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=13737, groups=}, [12]) = 0
open(/usr/lib/tc//f_u32.so, O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
or directory)
sendto(3,
(\0\0\0\22\0\1\3\6\267\217U\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0...,
40, 0, NULL, 0) = 40
recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=},
msg_iov(1)=[{l\4\0\0\20\0\2\0\6\267\217U\2515\0\0\0\0\4\3\1\0\0\0I\0\1\0\0\0\0\0...,
16384}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 3420
recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=},
msg_iov(1)=[{\24\0\0\0\3\0\2\0\6\267\217U\2515\0\0\0\0\0\0, 16384}],
msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 20
sendmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=},
msg_iov(1)=[{,\0\0\0,\0\5\6\7\267\217U\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\377\377\377\377...,
44}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 44
recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=},
msg_iov(1)=[{@\0\0\0\2\0\0\0\7\267\217U\2515\0\0\352\377\377\377,\0\0\0,\0\5\6\7\267\217U...,
16384}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 64
write(2, RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argum..., 36RTNETLINK answers:
Invalid argument
) = 36
write(2, We have an error talking to the ..., 39We have an error talking
to the kernel
) = 39
close(3)= 0
exit_group(2)   = ?
+++ exited with 2 +++


Iv'e tried searching for any related packages that would provide it, but no
success. Can anyone point out if there was any changes to file locations?
or if this is a bug?


Thank you.

-- 
Aron Podrigal
-
//Be happy :-)

Re: tc / iproute2 shared libraries missing - jessie

[Podrigal, Aron]

Ok, looks like I had to create the qdisc first before I can create a filter.

On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Podrigal, Aron ar...@guaranteedplus.com
wrote:

 After looking a bit more, it looks to me that this is what was happening
 (correct me if I'm wrong). looks like those filter types are now statically
 linked into tc. But if the parameters given to  tc could not be understood
 using any statically linked algorithms, tc tries to dynamically load other
 libraries matching matched by keywords within the command line arguments.
 However I still do not understand why my command is not valid.

 On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Podrigal, Aron ar...@guaranteedplus.com
 wrote:

 I am trying to do traffic shaping using tc, however I can't add any
 filters and am getting this  generic error message

 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
 We have an error talking to the kernel


 A simple strace shows that the problem is that it can't find the required
 filter type libraries in /usr/lib/tc/filter_type

 socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW|SOCK_CLOEXEC, NETLINK_ROUTE) = 3
 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF, [32768], 4) = 0
 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF, [1048576], 4) = 0
 bind(3, {sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=}, 12) = 0
 getsockname(3, {sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=13737, groups=}, [12])
 = 0
 open(/usr/lib/tc//f_u32.so, O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such
 file or directory)
 sendto(3,
 (\0\0\0\22\0\1\3\6\267\217U\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0...,
 40, 0, NULL, 0) = 40
 recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=},
 msg_iov(1)=[{l\4\0\0\20\0\2\0\6\267\217U\2515\0\0\0\0\4\3\1\0\0\0I\0\1\0\0\0\0\0...,
 16384}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 3420
 recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=},
 msg_iov(1)=[{\24\0\0\0\3\0\2\0\6\267\217U\2515\0\0\0\0\0\0, 16384}],
 msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 20
 sendmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=},
 msg_iov(1)=[{,\0\0\0,\0\5\6\7\267\217U\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\377\377\377\377...,
 44}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 44
 recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=},
 msg_iov(1)=[{@\0\0\0\2\0\0\0\7\267\217U\2515\0\0\352\377\377\377,\0\0\0,\0\5\6\7\267\217U...,
 16384}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 64
 write(2, RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argum..., 36RTNETLINK answers:
 Invalid argument
 ) = 36
 write(2, We have an error talking to the ..., 39We have an error
 talking to the kernel
 ) = 39
 close(3)= 0
 exit_group(2)   = ?
 +++ exited with 2 +++


 Iv'e tried searching for any related packages that would provide it, but
 no success. Can anyone point out if there was any changes to file
 locations? or if this is a bug?


 Thank you.

 --
 Aron Podrigal
 -
 //Be happy :-)




 --
 Aron Podrigal
 -
 //Be happy :-)




-- 
Aron Podrigal
-
//Be happy :-)

Re: why are libraries in jessi more up to date

[Bob Proulx]

Anil Duggirala wrote:
 Im a newbie and would like to know why libraries in Jessie are some much
 more up to date than in wheezy ? If the libraries have been tested and
 are stable then why arent they available in the wheezy repositories. I
 had a terrible time, trying to get a newer version of glibc to play some
 games in wheezy, and the version in jessie is much more up to date,
 thanks for the info,

If everything in Wheezy 7 were upgraded to the latest best known
versions then it would be called Jessie 8.  That is exactly how Jessie
8 was created.  Jessie 8 is Wheezy 7 with all of the libraries and
other packages updated.

Bob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

why are libraries in jessi more up to date

[Anil Duggirala]

Im a newbie and would like to know why libraries in Jessie are some much
more up to date than in wheezy ? If the libraries have been tested and
are stable then why arent they available in the wheezy repositories. I
had a terrible time, trying to get a newer version of glibc to play some
games in wheezy, and the version in jessie is much more up to date,
thanks for the info,


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1431806505.1026848.270500385.44d15...@webmail.messagingengine.com

Re: why are libraries in jessi more up to date

[Gary Dale]

On 16/05/15 08:18 PM, Liam O'Toole wrote:

On 2015-05-16, Anil Duggirala anilduggir...@fastmail.fm wrote:

Im a newbie and would like to know why libraries in Jessie are some much
more up to date than in wheezy ? If the libraries have been tested and
are stable then why arent they available in the wheezy repositories. I
had a terrible time, trying to get a newer version of glibc to play some
games in wheezy, and the version in jessie is much more up to date,
thanks for the info,

The vey meaning of stable in a Debian context is that software
versions don't (usually) change over the course of a release. Therefore
it's no surprise that libraries in jessie (released last month) are more
up-to-date than those in wheezy (released in 2013).



Just to put that in context. I had a server which originally ran Squeeze 
without problems. I upgraded to Wheezy some time later, again without 
problems. Somewhere over the course of Wheezy updates however, something 
broke.


The motherboard had USB3 ports and AMD graphics (although it was 
headless - just in case I needed to hook a monitor up) and the IOMMU 
started acting up (Strangely I have a workstation running Jessie with a 
similar problem). Even though the updates were mainly security fixes, I 
lost the ability to remotely (re)start the machine. My ssh connection 
couldn't establish because the IOMMU code for this particular board was 
broken. I had to be on site with monitor and keyboard to boot to repair 
mode then manually start the services I needed.


Last week I found myself having to upgrade to Jessie to fix the issue. 
Although Jessie code is what is currently causing the problem with my 
workstation, it fixed the problem on the server.


Stories like this abound, which is why people are leery about upgrading 
critical systems. Stable means that only serious bug fixes and security 
updates are issued, not feature enhancements. Limiting the numbers of 
updates means that larger installations get to test them before running 
them live, while smaller setups like small or home offices can usually 
feel safe performing updates.


Normally I wouldn't upgrade a server until the .1 release of the new 
Debian stable. In this case, I had a problem so I took a chance that 
upgrading on the .0 release would fix more than it broke. Thanks to the 
quality of the Debian development process, the upgrade went smoothly and 
the system is running properly again.


If you want to keep up with the latest libraries, etc., run 
Debian/Testing permanently. This is fairly stable but you will encounter 
problems from time to time, as you will with any rolling release distro.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55580ee4.8040...@torfree.net

Re: why are libraries in jessi more up to date

[Liam O'Toole]

On 2015-05-16, Anil Duggirala anilduggir...@fastmail.fm wrote:
 Im a newbie and would like to know why libraries in Jessie are some much
 more up to date than in wheezy ? If the libraries have been tested and
 are stable then why arent they available in the wheezy repositories. I
 had a terrible time, trying to get a newer version of glibc to play some
 games in wheezy, and the version in jessie is much more up to date,
 thanks for the info,

The vey meaning of stable in a Debian context is that software
versions don't (usually) change over the course of a release. Therefore
it's no surprise that libraries in jessie (released last month) are more
up-to-date than those in wheezy (released in 2013).

-- 

Liam



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/slrnmlfnif.tmg.liam.p.otoole@dipsy.tubbynet

Shared libraries not found during build

[Joel Roth]

Hi list,



I'm running sid. For the first time in many months, I'm
trying to build a package from source. After compiling I'm
getting library-not-found errors, for example: 

apt-get source ntfs-3g

debuild -b -uc -us

Which eventually triggers a library not found error:

make[1]: Entering directory '/home/jroth/build/ntfs-3g-2014.2.15AR.2'
dh_makeshlibs --add-udeb=ntfs-3g-udeb -Vlibntfs-3g852
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/jroth/build/ntfs-3g-2014.2.15AR.2'
   dh_shlibdeps -O--parallel
dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libntfs-3g.so.852 needed by 
debian/ntfs-3g/bin/ntfscmp (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '')
dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libc.so.6 needed by 
debian/ntfs-3g/bin/ntfscmp (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '')

and ends with this message:

dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot continue due to the errors listed above
Note: libraries are not searched in other binary packages that do not have any 
shlibs or symbols file.
To help dpkg-shlibdeps find private libraries, you might need to use -l.

The full output is here: http://paste.debian.net/131197/

Any ideas what could be wrong with my build environment?

Kind regards,


--
Joel Roth


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141112200826.GA31616@sprite

Re: Shared libraries not found during build

[Sven Joachim]

On 2014-11-12 21:08 +0100, Joel Roth wrote:

 I'm running sid. For the first time in many months, I'm
 trying to build a package from source. After compiling I'm
 getting library-not-found errors, for example: 

 apt-get source ntfs-3g

 debuild -b -uc -us

 Which eventually triggers a library not found error:

 make[1]: Entering directory '/home/jroth/build/ntfs-3g-2014.2.15AR.2'
 dh_makeshlibs --add-udeb=ntfs-3g-udeb -Vlibntfs-3g852
 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/jroth/build/ntfs-3g-2014.2.15AR.2'
dh_shlibdeps -O--parallel
 dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libntfs-3g.so.852 needed
 by debian/ntfs-3g/bin/ntfscmp (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '')
 dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libc.so.6 needed by
 debian/ntfs-3g/bin/ntfscmp (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '')

My hunch is that one of the files /etc/ld.so.conf and
/etc/ld.so.conf.d/x86_64-linux-gnu.conf is missing or corrupt.  Can you
please run dpkg --verify libc-bin libc6:amd64 as root?

Cheers,
   Sven


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87r3x8f97t@turtle.gmx.de

Re: Shared libraries not found during build

[Joel Roth]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:35:34PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
 On 2014-11-12 21:08 +0100, Joel Roth wrote:
 
  I'm running sid. For the first time in many months, I'm
  trying to build a package from source. After compiling I'm
  getting library-not-found errors, for example: 
 
  apt-get source ntfs-3g
 
  debuild -b -uc -us
 
  Which eventually triggers a library not found error:
 
  make[1]: Entering directory '/home/jroth/build/ntfs-3g-2014.2.15AR.2'
  dh_makeshlibs --add-udeb=ntfs-3g-udeb -Vlibntfs-3g852
  make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/jroth/build/ntfs-3g-2014.2.15AR.2'
 dh_shlibdeps -O--parallel
  dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libntfs-3g.so.852 needed
  by debian/ntfs-3g/bin/ntfscmp (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '')
  dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libc.so.6 needed by
  debian/ntfs-3g/bin/ntfscmp (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '')
 
 My hunch is that one of the files /etc/ld.so.conf and
 /etc/ld.so.conf.d/x86_64-linux-gnu.conf is missing or corrupt.  Can you
 please run dpkg --verify libc-bin libc6:amd64 as root?

/etc/ld.so.conf.d/x86_64-linux-gnu.conf is missing.

$ sudo dpkg --verify libc-bin libc6:amd64

??5?? c /etc/ld.so.conf
??5?? c /etc/ld.so.conf.d/x86_64-linux-gnu.conf

Thanks,

Joel
 
 Cheers,
Sven
 
-- 
Joel Roth
  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141112210334.GA2060@sprite

Re: Shared libraries not found during build

[Sven Joachim]

On 2014-11-12 22:03 +0100, Joel Roth wrote:

 On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:35:34PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
 On 2014-11-12 21:08 +0100, Joel Roth wrote:
 
  I'm running sid. For the first time in many months, I'm
  trying to build a package from source. After compiling I'm
  getting library-not-found errors, for example: 
 
  apt-get source ntfs-3g
 
  debuild -b -uc -us
 
  Which eventually triggers a library not found error:
 
  make[1]: Entering directory '/home/jroth/build/ntfs-3g-2014.2.15AR.2'
  dh_makeshlibs --add-udeb=ntfs-3g-udeb -Vlibntfs-3g852
  make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/jroth/build/ntfs-3g-2014.2.15AR.2'
 dh_shlibdeps -O--parallel
  dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libntfs-3g.so.852 needed
  by debian/ntfs-3g/bin/ntfscmp (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '')
  dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libc.so.6 needed by
  debian/ntfs-3g/bin/ntfscmp (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '')
 
 My hunch is that one of the files /etc/ld.so.conf and
 /etc/ld.so.conf.d/x86_64-linux-gnu.conf is missing or corrupt.  Can you
 please run dpkg --verify libc-bin libc6:amd64 as root?

 /etc/ld.so.conf.d/x86_64-linux-gnu.conf is missing.

 $ sudo dpkg --verify libc-bin libc6:amd64

 ??5?? c /etc/ld.so.conf
 ??5?? c /etc/ld.so.conf.d/x86_64-linux-gnu.conf

Are you sure that /etc/ld.so.conf is not missing as well?  In any case,
you should reinstall the libc6 and libc-bin packages with the dpkg
--force-confmiss option to get those files back.

Cheers,
   Sven


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87k330f66w@turtle.gmx.de

Re: Shared libraries not found during build

[Elimar Riesebieter]

* Joel Roth jo...@pobox.com [2014-11-12 10:08 -1000]:

 
 Hi list,  
   
   
   
 I'm running sid. For the first time in many months, I'm
 trying to build a package from source. After compiling I'm
 getting library-not-found errors, for example: 
 
 apt-get source ntfs-3g
 
 debuild -b -uc -us
 
 Which eventually triggers a library not found error:
[...]
 dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot continue due to the errors listed above
 Note: libraries are not searched in other binary packages that do not have 
 any shlibs or symbols file.
 To help dpkg-shlibdeps find private libraries, you might need to use -l.

Try

# apt-get build-dep ntfs-3g

first and run the build again. All header dependencies for the build
should be installed now.

Elimar
-- 
 Numeric stability is probably not all that
  important when you're guessing;-)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/2014111128.ga1...@galadriel.home.lxtec.de

Re: Shared libraries not found during build - SOLVED

[Joel Roth]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:40:55PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
 On 2014-11-12 22:03 +0100, Joel Roth wrote:
 
  On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:35:34PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
  On 2014-11-12 21:08 +0100, Joel Roth wrote:
  
   I'm running sid. For the first time in many months, I'm
   trying to build a package from source. After compiling I'm
   getting library-not-found errors, for example: 
  
   apt-get source ntfs-3g
  
   debuild -b -uc -us
  
   Which eventually triggers a library not found error:
  
   make[1]: Entering directory '/home/jroth/build/ntfs-3g-2014.2.15AR.2'
   dh_makeshlibs --add-udeb=ntfs-3g-udeb -Vlibntfs-3g852
   make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/jroth/build/ntfs-3g-2014.2.15AR.2'
  dh_shlibdeps -O--parallel
   dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libntfs-3g.so.852 needed
   by debian/ntfs-3g/bin/ntfscmp (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '')
   dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libc.so.6 needed by
   debian/ntfs-3g/bin/ntfscmp (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '')
  
  My hunch is that one of the files /etc/ld.so.conf and
  /etc/ld.so.conf.d/x86_64-linux-gnu.conf is missing or corrupt.  Can you
  please run dpkg --verify libc-bin libc6:amd64 as root?
 
  /etc/ld.so.conf.d/x86_64-linux-gnu.conf is missing.
 
  $ sudo dpkg --verify libc-bin libc6:amd64
 
  ??5?? c /etc/ld.so.conf
  ??5?? c /etc/ld.so.conf.d/x86_64-linux-gnu.conf
 
 Are you sure that /etc/ld.so.conf is not missing as well?  In any case,
 you should reinstall the libc6 and libc-bin packages with the dpkg
 --force-confmiss option to get those files back.

Thanks for your help in resolving this!

Regards,

Joel
 
 Cheers,
Sven
 

-- 
Joel Roth
  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141113013302.GA4881@sprite

Re: Shared libraries not found during build

[Joel Roth]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:21:28PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
 * Joel Roth jo...@pobox.com [2014-11-12 10:08 -1000]:
 
  
  Hi list,
  
  
  
  I'm running sid. For the first time in many months, I'm
  trying to build a package from source. After compiling I'm
  getting library-not-found errors, for example: 
  
  apt-get source ntfs-3g
  
  debuild -b -uc -us
  
  Which eventually triggers a library not found error:
 [...]
  dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot continue due to the errors listed above
  Note: libraries are not searched in other binary packages that do not have 
  any shlibs or symbols file.
  To help dpkg-shlibdeps find private libraries, you might need to use -l.
 
 Try
 
 # apt-get build-dep ntfs-3g
 
 first and run the build again. All header dependencies for the build
 should be installed now.

Thanks, that is a good suggestion, however I had all
the build dependencies; the error turned out to be as Sven
suggested: missing libraries indicated an issue with
the config files /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*.conf.

Regards,

Joel
 
 Elimar
 -- 
  Numeric stability is probably not all that
   important when you're guessing;-)
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: 
 https://lists.debian.org/2014111128.ga1...@galadriel.home.lxtec.de
 

-- 
Joel Roth
  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141113013431.GB4881@sprite

Re: error while loading shared libraries: liblexprintjob.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [SOLUCIONADO]

[Camaleón]

El Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:30:15 -0300, Robert J. Briones C. escribió:

 El día 20 de enero de 2013 14:25, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com
 escribió:

(...)

 creo que tambien es por que el driver de lexmark ocupa librerias 32 y
 esa libreria esta en 64

 ¿De qué driver o paquete estamos hablando?


 fueron unos tar del driver de la lexmark z600

Hay que ver lo que os gusta la imprecisión :-)

Vale, pero ¿unos tar descargados de dónde? De la página de lexmark, del 
repositorio oficial de Debian, de una página web de terceros... el origen 
del paquete es importante para saber qué problema tienes exactamente y 
cómo atacarlo.

 instale la libreria en 32 la baje en deb y ejecute :

 dpkg --force-architecture -i libcupsimage2_1.4.4-7+squeeze2_i386.deb

 y ahora me sale el error

 ¿Qué error, exactamente?

 lo mismo pero con otro archivo...

¿Lo mismo que qué? Que no somos adivinos  X-)

 como que necesito la de 64, existe alguna forma de tener las 2
 intaladas ?

 Hum... es que ese paquete existe para 64 bits, no creo que lo que estés
 intentando hacer sea lo correcto.

 Por otra parte, Google apunta a que la instalación de ese modelo de
 impresora es un dolor de muelas en 64 bits pero por si te sirve de
 algo, aquí tienes los pasos para un modelo similar (X1190) en Ubuntu de
 64 bits:

 Instalar Lexmark x1190 en Ubuntu, Linux
 http://blog.sesatu.com/sistemas-operativos/instalar-lexmark-x1190-en-ubuntu-linux/

 Lexmark X1190 with Ubuntu 11.10 (64 bits)
 http://angel-de-vicente.blogspot.com.es/2012/07/lexmark-x1190-with-ubuntu-1110-64-bits.html


 Gracias camaleon, si esto no fuera GNU, creería que te pagan por
 contestar en la lista, se agradece tu enfasis en cada respuesta que das.

La gente suele pasar por alto que respondiendo se aprende mucho y para 
eso precisamente sirven estas listas.
 
 te cuento que de mucho probar y probar cosas, decidi instalar la
 libreria i386 (instale ia32 algo así), y me funcionó 

Bien, ese paquete es necesario tal y como explica en el segundo de los 
enlaces que te pasé.

 pero me dio error otro archivo (con la misma libreria decia que no la
 encontraba), y era por que utilizaba la de 64 y una desintalaba la otra
 o algo así.

Tendría que ver el menaje de error exacto...
 
 lo que hice fue .instalar en 32 con dpkg force. y copiar la libreria de
 lib a lib32 y despues instale la de 64 con apt-get reinstall y esa quedó
 en lib, y pude imprimir la página de prueba y todo bien .

Vaya zancocho pero si te ha funcionado, pues hala, a tirar millas :-D

 Creo que este HILO tiene mas complicacion en tratar de entenderme que en
 el problema en si xD...

Hubiera sido más sencillo poner los datos exactos (paquete, mensajes de 
error...) en lugar de interpretarlos :-)

Saludos,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/kdosji$oip$4...@ger.gmane.org

Re: error while loading shared libraries: liblexprintjob.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

[Camaleón]

El Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:33:06 -0300, Robert J. Briones C. escribió:

 El día 19 de enero de 2013 16:26, Robert J. Briones C.
 robert.brio...@gmail.com escribió:
 Estimados.

 tengo este problema con cups y lexmark 1180

Uf, lexmark... peligro :-/

 /usr/lib/cups/filter/rastertoz600: error while loading shared
 libraries: liblexprintjob.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such
 file or directory

(...)

 Uso debian64

 esto ya se soluciono, era un problema de librerias.
 
 ahora tengo otro problema con la libreria libcupsimage2
 
 creo que tambien es por que el driver de lexmark ocupa librerias 32 y
 esa libreria esta en 64

¿De qué driver o paquete estamos hablando?

 instale la libreria en 32 la baje en deb y ejecute :
 
 dpkg --force-architecture -i libcupsimage2_1.4.4-7+squeeze2_i386.deb
 
 y ahora me sale el error 

¿Qué error, exactamente?

 como que necesito la de 64, existe alguna forma de tener las 2
 intaladas ?

Hum... es que ese paquete existe para 64 bits, no creo que lo que estés 
intentando hacer sea lo correcto.

Por otra parte, Google apunta a que la instalación de ese modelo de 
impresora es un dolor de muelas en 64 bits pero por si te sirve de algo, 
aquí tienes los pasos para un modelo similar (X1190) en Ubuntu de 64 bits:

Instalar Lexmark x1190 en Ubuntu, Linux
http://blog.sesatu.com/sistemas-operativos/instalar-lexmark-x1190-en-ubuntu-linux/

Lexmark X1190 with Ubuntu 11.10 (64 bits) 
http://angel-de-vicente.blogspot.com.es/2012/07/lexmark-x1190-with-ubuntu-1110-64-bits.html

Saludos (y suerte),

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/kdh99g$qmn$1...@ger.gmane.org

Re: error while loading shared libraries: liblexprintjob.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

[Robert J. Briones C.]

El día 19 de enero de 2013 16:26, Robert J. Briones C.
robert.brio...@gmail.com escribió:
 Estimados.

 tengo este problema con cups y lexmark 1180

 /usr/lib/cups/filter/rastertoz600: error while loading shared
 libraries: liblexprintjob.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No
 such file or directory

 eso me sale cuando ejecuto por ejemplo

 usr/lib/cups/filter/rastertoz600 failed

 segun veo la libreria esta en

 /usr/lib/liblexprintjob.a
 /usr/lib/liblexprintjob.la
 /usr/lib/liblexprintjob.so.0.0.0

 segui los pasos de esta guia para ubuntu
 http://www.ubuntu-es.org/node/18296#.UPrk3flE_Dc

 he buscado mucho y todos tienen error con la libreria libstdc++.so.5,
 la que se puede encontrar a los repositorios, pero con el error que me
 pasa a mi no se realmente que hacer.

 Uso debian64

 gracias y saludos.

esto ya se soluciono, era un problema de librerias.

ahora tengo otro problema con la libreria libcupsimage2

creo que tambien es por que el driver de lexmark ocupa librerias 32 y
esa libreria esta en 64

instale la libreria en 32 la baje en deb y ejecute :

dpkg --force-architecture -i libcupsimage2_1.4.4-7+squeeze2_i386.deb

y ahora me sale el error como que necesito la de 64, existe alguna
forma de tener las 2 intaladas ?


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAGUcOaH7+Ji+WVmE6Bnpp=FySi+dEkSKD3nTC=ch155umu9...@mail.gmail.com

Re: OT: Wheezy: Error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0

[rick]

Hi,

Try this:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu ./reflash

Rick

 Hi,

 Am trying to reflash my cellphone from wheezy using reflash program and
 am getting a weird No such file or directory error for
 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0. I had tried adding  /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu to
 the PATH but got the same error message.

 Any ideas? Thanks



 $ ./reflash
 ./reflash: error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0:
 cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

 $ ls -l /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Aug  6 12:30
 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 -
 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.10

 $ ls -l /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.10
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4442248 Aug  6 12:30
 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.10

 # dpkg -S libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
 libgtk2.0-0:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
 libgtk2.0-0:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.10

 # uname -a
 Linux test 3.2.0-3-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Jul 23 02:45:17 UTC 2012 x86_64
 GNU/Linux



 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive:
 http://lists.debian.org/1350611456.28129.yahoomail...@web121903.mail.ne1.yahoo.com





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/29277d2a1a976ec88dbcf7c0c561908d.squir...@www.microway.com

OT: Wheezy: Error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0

[T Elcor]

Hi,

Am trying to reflash my cellphone from wheezy using reflash program and am 
getting a weird No such file or directory error for  libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0. I 
had tried adding  /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu to the PATH but got the same 
error message.

Any ideas? Thanks



$ ./reflash
./reflash: error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: cannot 
open shared object file: No such file or directory

$ ls -l /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Aug  6 12:30 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 - libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.10

$ ls -l /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.10
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4442248 Aug  6 12:30 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.10

# dpkg -S libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
libgtk2.0-0:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
libgtk2.0-0:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.10

# uname -a
Linux test 3.2.0-3-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Jul 23 02:45:17 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1350611456.28129.yahoomail...@web121903.mail.ne1.yahoo.com

Re: OT: Wheezy: Error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0

[Ralf Mardorf]

# ldconfig


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1350614002.1112.131.camel@localhost.localdomain

Re: OT: Wheezy: Error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0

[T Elcor]

- Original Message -

 From: Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net

 # ldconfig

# ldconfig -v | grep -i libgtk-x11-2
ldconfig: Path `/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu' given more than once
ldconfig: Path `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu' given more than once
    libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 - libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.10

I'm beginning to suspect reflash is a 32-bit program. Could this be the 
reason?  Thanks


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1350615111.34116.yahoomail...@web121906.mail.ne1.yahoo.com

Re: OT: Wheezy: Error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 19:51 -0700, T Elcor wrote:
 - Original Message -
 
  From: Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
 
  # ldconfig
 
 # ldconfig -v | grep -i libgtk-x11-2
 ldconfig: Path `/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu' given more than once
 ldconfig: Path `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu' given more than once
 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 - libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.10
 
 I'm beginning to suspect reflash is a 32-bit program. Could this be the 
 reason?  Thanks

I guess you're right.

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=730884



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1350615657.1112.133.camel@localhost.localdomain

Re: OT: Wheezy: Error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0

[T Elcor]

- Original Message -
  I'm beginning to suspect reflash is a 32-bit program. Could 
 this be the reason?  Thanks
 
 I guess you're right.
 
 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=730884

Yes, it is a 32-bit app,  # aptitude install lib32ncurses5 libgtk2.0-0 
ia32-libs-gtk solves it. Thanks



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1350622324.49707.yahoomail...@web121902.mail.ne1.yahoo.com

i386 testing: java not recognizing its libraries and libreoffice not launching

[Francesco Pietra]

Following update/upgrade, java does not recognize libjli.so any more.
I had to set LD_LIBRARY... to remedy.

Nonetheless, libreoffice  does not start any more:

francesco@deb32:~$ libreoffice
terminate called after throwing an instance of
'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException'
francesco@deb32:~$


I thought it is a java problem. What else?

Incidentally, I turned to AbiWORD for my .dot table. Unless my i386
testing has major problems, that text editor is simply unusable for
complex tables. In general, while at the linux prompt Debian works
well (in particular amd64 testing, here in use for a  GPU-CPU
cluster), once gnome is launched installed, problems arise. Too many
things that in science are not used, too much done automatically, and
often erroneously. I am at gnome simply for gchempaint, other wise
there is no decent pdf reader not CD burner, which are useful to any
purpose. I had to install okular and k3b, making the complex even more
complex. With such stuff as gnome, which even pretends to take care of
upgrading, newcomers will not even learn how to mount a device.

Thanks for advice about libreoffice

francesco pietra

PS: I am not at the stable i386 version simply to have a
correspondence with testing amd64 which we have to use for recent
nvidia  drivers for GPU-CPU clusters.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAEv0nmvQsv-FSG90By0=ohg4vx7mlzpwmjp-ktgue9rtyex...@mail.gmail.com

Fwd: i386 testing: java not recognizing its libraries and libreoffice and okular not launching

[Francesco Pietra]

In addition, I have now noticed that even okular does not start
anymore after that infamous apt-get update/upgrade with i386 testing:

francesco@deb32:~$ okular
okular(3765): you need to call Settings::instance before using
KCrash: Application 'okular' crashing...
KCrash: Attempting to start /usr/lib/kde4/libexec/drkonqi from kdeinit
sock_file=/home/francesco/.kde/socket-deb32/kdeinit4__0
Warning: connect() failed: : No such file or directory
KCrash: Attempting to start /usr/lib/kde4/libexec/drkonqi directly
drkonqi(3766): Unable to find an internal debugger that can work with
the KCrash backend

[1]+  Stopped okular
francesco@deb32:~$



-- Forwarded message --
From: Francesco Pietra chiendar...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:52 PM
Subject: i386 testing: java not recognizing its libraries and
libreoffice not launching
To: debian-users debian-user@lists.debian.org


Following update/upgrade, java does not recognize libjli.so any more.
I had to set LD_LIBRARY... to remedy.

Nonetheless, libreoffice  does not start any more:

francesco@deb32:~$ libreoffice
terminate called after throwing an instance of
'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException'
francesco@deb32:~$


I thought it is a java problem. What else?

Incidentally, I turned to AbiWORD for my .dot table. Unless my i386
testing has major problems, that text editor is simply unusable for
complex tables. In general, while at the linux prompt Debian works
well (in particular amd64 testing, here in use for a  GPU-CPU
cluster), once gnome is launched installed, problems arise. Too many
things that in science are not used, too much done automatically, and
often erroneously. I am at gnome simply for gchempaint, other wise
there is no decent pdf reader not CD burner, which are useful to any
purpose. I had to install okular and k3b, making the complex even more
complex. With such stuff as gnome, which even pretends to take care of
upgrading, newcomers will not even learn how to mount a device.

Thanks for advice about libreoffice

francesco pietra

PS: I am not at the stable i386 version simply to have a
correspondence with testing amd64 which we have to use for recent
nvidia  drivers for GPU-CPU clusters.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caev0nmvaddngi9wmvevqlqzqouwh+vm2ecan2d9mbt+v7kb...@mail.gmail.com

Re: i386 testing: java not recognizing its libraries and libreoffice not launching

[Camaleón]

On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 15:52:59 +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:

 Following update/upgrade, java does not recognize libjli.so any more. I
 had to set LD_LIBRARY... to remedy.
 
 Nonetheless, libreoffice  does not start any more:
 
 francesco@deb32:~$ libreoffice
 terminate called after throwing an instance of 
 'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException' 
 francesco@deb32:~$
 
 
 I thought it is a java problem. What else?

(...)

A bug? :-)

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678532

Although it is marked as solved since version (3.5.3), check if any of 
the hints given there it helps in your case.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jsskmq$4gd$1...@dough.gmane.org

Re: Fwd: i386 testing: java not recognizing its libraries and libreoffice and okular not launching

[Camaleón]

On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:11:38 +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:

 In addition, I have now noticed that even okular does not start anymore
 after that infamous apt-get update/upgrade with i386 testing:
 
 francesco@deb32:~$ okular
 okular(3765): you need to call Settings::instance before using KCrash:
 Application 'okular' crashing... 

(...)

Hints:

- Try from a clean profile (a new created user account).

- Did you restart the system after the update? This can sound weird in  
linux but I find it helps a lot when using the big desktops (like KDE4 or 
GNOME3) to power-cycle their D-Bus/socket/pipes thingies.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jssl8j$4gd$1...@dough.gmane.org

Securing Debian Manual: 4.2.1 Security update of libraries

[Stayvoid]

Hello.

Bringing the system to run level 1 (single user) and then back to run
level 3 (multi user) should take care of the restart of most (if not
all) system services. But this is not an option if you are executing
the security upgrade from a remote connection (like ssh) since it will
be severed.
I'll upgrade from a remote connection (SSH). What should I do instead
of this procedure?

http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch4.en.html

Cheers


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAK5fS_EEF+25ZrdXKonwotq5kvEdv=u2ped6-f1tb6rvn_e...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Securing Debian Manual: 4.2.1 Security update of libraries

[Stayvoid]

Exercise caution when dealing with security upgrades if you are doing
them over a remote connection like ssh. A suggested procedure for a
security upgrade that involves a service restart is to restart the SSH
daemon and then, inmediately, attempt a new ssh connection without
breaking the previous one. If the connection fails, revert the upgrade
and investigate the issue.
How to make it?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cak5fs_h-z-susqudvnahh44nxg_sptgoabh93pv+fgxx+1d...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Compiling non-Debian package (amaya) OpenGL libraries required

[Alberto Luaces]

Sian Mountbatten writes:

 Hi All!

 Does anybody know which package provides OpenGL libraries for development?

 I am using the siduction distribution which is based on Debian sid.

Look for libGL.so (as is, without trailing numbers) under your usr/.  It
could have been installed as a result of pulling your graphic card's
driver.  If not, libgl1-mesa-dev is the package you are looking for.

-- 
Alberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87eht69mgl@eps142.cdf.udc.es

Re: Compiling non-Debian package (amaya) OpenGL libraries required

[Camaleón]

On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:15:45 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:

 Does anybody know which package provides OpenGL libraries for
 development?
 
 I am using the siduction distribution which is based on Debian sid.

http://www.w3.org/Amaya/User/AmayaWX.html#What

THT.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jj5alu$ds9$1...@dough.gmane.org

Re: Compiling non-Debian package (amaya) OpenGL libraries required

[Sian Mountbatten]

On 06/03/12 15:40, Camaleón wrote:

On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:15:45 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:


Does anybody know which package provides OpenGL libraries for
development?

I am using the siduction distribution which is based on Debian sid.


http://www.w3.org/Amaya/User/AmayaWX.html#What

THT.

Greetings,



Very useful, TVM


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jj5f22$5t0$1...@speranza.aioe.org

Compiling non-Debian package (amaya) OpenGL libraries required

[Sian Mountbatten]

Hi All!

Does anybody know which package provides OpenGL libraries for development?

I am using the siduction distribution which is based on Debian sid.
--
Sian Mountbatten
Algol 68 specialist


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jj3dud$j8m$1...@speranza.aioe.org

Re: Which development and image libraries needed to build emacs-24

[Harry Putnam]

Michael Heerdegen michael_heerde...@web.de writes:

 Hello Harry,

 just for the case you didn't know this: there is also an emacs-snapshot
 package for Debian, here:

   http://emacs.naquadah.org/

Thanks... good to know.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/878vle3nqx@newsguy.com

Re: Which development and image libraries needed to build emacs-24

[Chris Davies]

Chris Davies chris-use...@roaima.co.uk writes:
 Google debian install X development libraries suggests xorg-dev [...]
 Google debian install gtk development libraries [...]

Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
 I guess you are joking?  When I do either of those searches I get
 exactly 1 hit... and it is the reply message of yours that I quote
 here. 

Very strange. I get 2,660,000 results, and the second is the one to
which I was referring: package libgtk2.0-dev. (Did you perhaps include
the quote marks? I didn't.)


 | sure you have development files for image handling, i.e.
 | tiff, gif, jpeg, png and xpm.

 It didn't seem to be particularly hard to follow the motif and find
 development package suggestions for at least some of these.

 I don't understand you here either ...  motif?

Theme. (Perhaps motif was a bad choice of word given the context.)

libtiff-dev or libtiff4-dev
libopenjpeg-dev or libjpeg62-dev or libjpeg8-dev

I've provided alternatives as suggested by Google because I've not
investigated which one is really the correct one; or perhaps there are
several required. I don't know.

Chris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/hekot8x9qh@news.roaima.co.uk

Re: Which development and image libraries needed to build emacs-24

[Harry Putnam]

Chris Davies chris-use...@roaima.co.uk writes:


[...]

 Very strange. I get 2,660,000 results, and the second is the one to
 which I was referring: package libgtk2.0-dev. (Did you perhaps include
 the quote marks? I didn't.)


Yes with the quotes.  I assumed that was your intent.

 | sure you have development files for image handling, i.e.
 | tiff, gif, jpeg, png and xpm.

 It didn't seem to be particularly hard to follow the motif and find
 development package suggestions for at least some of these.

 I don't understand you here either ...  motif?

 Theme. (Perhaps motif was a bad choice of word given the context.)

 libtiff-dev or libtiff4-dev
 libopenjpeg-dev or libjpeg62-dev or libjpeg8-dev

Thanks again.  In spite of my wooden headedness your clues solved the
problem as I reported in my first reply.

These again are plenty to solve further possible problems.  Very
helpful.

The last problem I reported:

,
| [...]
| creating src/epaths.h
| make[1]: Entering directory `/anex/usr_local/src/vcs/bzr/emacs/trunk'
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/anex/usr_local/src/vcs/bzr/emacs/trunk'
| config.status: executing gdbinit commands
| config.status: executing gdbinit commands
| ./config.status: line 2071: syntax error near unexpected token `;'
| ./config.status: line 2071: `;'
`

 Looking at that area of the file, I don't really see which `;' is out
 of place.
  
Was solved by further activities of emacs developers, and an update of
my bzr copy has removed that as well, so now compiling trouble free.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ty45n4q7@newsguy.com

Re: Which development and image libraries needed to build emacs-24

[Harry Putnam]

Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com writes:

 Harry Putnam wrote:
 Which development and image libraries needed to build emacs-24
 Can anyone offer a suggestion of what pkgs might be missing.

 A good place to start is with the build dependencies for emacs23.

   # apt-get install build-dep emacs23

 Installing the build dependencies for emacs23 may not be sufficient
 for building emacs24.  But it should get you quite far along the way
 to it.  Try that first.

Thanks, yes.  But in this case I already had that installed.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87pqetn4o2@newsguy.com

Re: Which development and image libraries needed to build emacs-24

[Michael Heerdegen]

Hello Harry,

just for the case you didn't know this: there is also an emacs-snapshot
package for Debian, here:

  http://emacs.naquadah.org/


- Michael


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87aa5x8xxc@web.de

Re: Which development and image libraries needed to build emacs-24

[Harry Putnam]

Chris Davies chris-use...@roaima.co.uk writes:

 Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
 When I run this configure command:
 ./configure --with-xft --with-x-toolkit=lucid \
   --prefix=/usr/local/src/vcs/bzr/test/

 I get this final error:

 | configure: error: You seem to be running X, but no X development libraries
 | were found.

 Google debian install X development libraries suggests xorg-dev as
 the metapackage for ... X Window System development libraries.


 | and for the toolkit you want, such as Gtk+, Lesstif or Motif

 Google debian install gtk development libraries seems to provide some
 good suggestions


I guess you are joking?  When I do either of those searches I get
exactly 1 hit... and it is the reply message of yours that I quote
here. 

However xorg-dev appears to be the main source of trouble.

 | sure you have development files for image handling, i.e.
 | tiff, gif, jpeg, png and xpm.

 It didn't seem to be particularly hard to follow the motif and find
 development package suggestions for at least some of these.

I don't understand you here either ...  motif?

But with the xorg-dev pkg installed ./configure ends in another error
of a different kind.  I'm not sure if it something that must be fixed
before trying to build or not.

,
| [...]
| creating src/epaths.h
| make[1]: Entering directory `/anex/usr_local/src/vcs/bzr/emacs/trunk'
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/anex/usr_local/src/vcs/bzr/emacs/trunk'
| config.status: executing gdbinit commands
| config.status: executing gdbinit commands
| ./config.status: line 2071: syntax error near unexpected token `;'
| ./config.status: line 2071: `;'
`


Looking at that area of the file, I don't really see which `;' is out
of place.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87hb07lfx1@newsguy.com

Re: Which development and image libraries needed to build emacs-24

[Bob Proulx]

Harry Putnam wrote:
 Which development and image libraries needed to build emacs-24
 Can anyone offer a suggestion of what pkgs might be missing.

A good place to start is with the build dependencies for emacs23.

  # apt-get install build-dep emacs23

Installing the build dependencies for emacs23 may not be sufficient
for building emacs24.  But it should get you quite far along the way
to it.  Try that first.

Bob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Which development and image libraries needed to build emacs-24

[Harry Putnam]

I'm sorry since I asked this question a while back but am not finding
the answers now... search.gmane.org only turns up the same question by
me from 2008.

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.user/342622

Googling brings up this same thread as the first hit.

But apparently the package names have changed or something since
search for the pkgs mentioned there fails.


So cutting to the chase:

When I run this configure command:
./configure --with-xft --with-x-toolkit=lucid \
   --prefix=/usr/local/src/vcs/bzr/test/

I get this final error:

,
| configure: error: You seem to be running X, but no X development libraries
| were found.  You should install the relevant development files for X
| and for the toolkit you want, such as Gtk+, Lesstif or Motif.  Also make
| sure you have development files for image handling, i.e.
| tiff, gif, jpeg, png and xpm.
`

I know I recently had this problem and solved it with someones
help... but am not finding that solution now.

Can anyone offer a suggestion of what pkgs might be missing.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87hb08mxu2@newsguy.com

Re: Which development and image libraries needed to build emacs-24

[Wayne Topa]

On 01/06/2012 02:32 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:

I'm sorry since I asked this question a while back but am not finding
the answers now... search.gmane.org only turns up the same question by
me from 2008.

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.user/342622

Googling brings up this same thread as the first hit.

But apparently the package names have changed or something since
search for the pkgs mentioned there fails.


So cutting to the chase:

When I run this configure command:
./configure --with-xft --with-x-toolkit=lucid \
--prefix=/usr/local/src/vcs/bzr/test/

I get this final error:

,
| configure: error: You seem to be running X, but no X development libraries
| were found.  You should install the relevant development files for X
| and for the toolkit you want, such as Gtk+, Lesstif or Motif.  Also make
| sure you have development files for image handling, i.e.
| tiff, gif, jpeg, png and xpm.
`

I know I recently had this problem and solved it with someones
help... but am not finding that solution now.

Can anyone offer a suggestion of what pkgs might be missing.




maybe you don't  have the xserver-xorg.dev package installed?

dpkg -l xserver-xorg-*

WT


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f075663.9080...@gmail.com

Re: Which development and image libraries needed to build emacs-24

[Wayne Topa]

On 01/06/2012 03:15 PM, Wayne Topa wrote:

On 01/06/2012 02:32 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:

I'm sorry since I asked this question a while back but am not finding
the answers now... search.gmane.org only turns up the same question by
me from 2008.

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.user/342622

Googling brings up this same thread as the first hit.

But apparently the package names have changed or something since
search for the pkgs mentioned there fails.


So cutting to the chase:

When I run this configure command:
./configure --with-xft --with-x-toolkit=lucid \
--prefix=/usr/local/src/vcs/bzr/test/

I get this final error:

,
| configure: error: You seem to be running X, but no X development
libraries
| were found. You should install the relevant development files for X
| and for the toolkit you want, such as Gtk+, Lesstif or Motif. Also make
| sure you have development files for image handling, i.e.
| tiff, gif, jpeg, png and xpm.
`

I know I recently had this problem and solved it with someones
help... but am not finding that solution now.

Can anyone offer a suggestion of what pkgs might be missing.






Forget this.  I was working on an xserver problem and my Old Mind went 
dead.   :-(



maybe you don't have the xserver-xorg.dev package installed?

dpkg -l xserver-xorg-*

WT



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f075784.2070...@gmail.com

Re: Which development and image libraries needed to build emacs-24

[Harry Putnam]

Wayne Topa linux...@gmail.com writes:


[...]


 Forget this.  I was working on an xserver problem and my Old Mind went
 dead.   :-(

Hehe... got a good chuckle out of that... That very thing is why I had
to post the query When I hit that error... my OLD MIND went dead.
Not sure its even recoverable hehe


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874nw8mvbf@newsguy.com

Re: Which development and image libraries needed to build emacs-24

[Chris Davies]

Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
 When I run this configure command:
 ./configure --with-xft --with-x-toolkit=lucid \
   --prefix=/usr/local/src/vcs/bzr/test/

 I get this final error:

 | configure: error: You seem to be running X, but no X development libraries
 | were found.

Google debian install X development libraries suggests xorg-dev as
the metapackage for ... X Window System development libraries.


 | and for the toolkit you want, such as Gtk+, Lesstif or Motif

Google debian install gtk development libraries seems to provide some
good suggestions


 | sure you have development files for image handling, i.e.
 | tiff, gif, jpeg, png and xpm.

It didn't seem to be particularly hard to follow the motif and find
development package suggestions for at least some of these.

Chris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2u1kt8xhei@news.roaima.co.uk

Re: How does one adjust the maximum number of clients reached using GTK libraries?

[Camaleón]

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:50:01 +0100, AG wrote:

 Today during a period when I had a number of various application windows
 open in Gnome on Debian stable (LibO, Iceweasel with about 6 tabs,
 acroread with 3 tabs, and Korganizer) I attempted to open an image using
 Geeqie.  This failed.  Using a terminal window I tried to open Geeqie
 again on the command line and this yielded a message (to the effect of)
 maximum number of clients reached and something about GTk.
 
 However, after closing a window I could then use Geeqie.  This is really
 strange - my system is running 2.84Gb of RAM, and 2.8 Gb of swap so it
 surely cannot be a memory issue.  But I don't know what it is.  The
 current uptime just over 10 days.
 
 Any ideas on what this is about would be gratefully received.

Hum... never happened before :-?

Google has some hints for you:

http://www.google.com/webhp?complete=0hl=en#sclient=psy-abhl=encomplete=0site=webhpsource=hpq=maximum+number+of+clients+reachedbtnK=Google+Searchbav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.fp=3e82efc6cc141df0biw=1280bih=888

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.09.09.11.46...@gmail.com

Re: How does one adjust the maximum number of clients reached using GTK libraries?

[AG]

On 09/09/11 12:46, Camaleón wrote:

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:50:01 +0100, AG wrote:


Today during a period when I had a number of various application windows
open in Gnome on Debian stable (LibO, Iceweasel with about 6 tabs,
acroread with 3 tabs, and Korganizer) I attempted to open an image using
Geeqie.  This failed.  Using a terminal window I tried to open Geeqie
again on the command line and this yielded a message (to the effect of)
maximum number of clients reached and something about GTk.

However, after closing a window I could then use Geeqie.  This is really
strange - my system is running 2.84Gb of RAM, and 2.8 Gb of swap so it
surely cannot be a memory issue.  But I don't know what it is.  The
current uptime just over 10 days.

Any ideas on what this is about would be gratefully received.

Hum... never happened before :-?

Google has some hints for you:

http://www.google.com/webhp?complete=0hl=en#sclient=psy-abhl=encomplete=0site=webhpsource=hpq=maximum+number+of+clients+reachedbtnK=Google+Searchbav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.fp=3e82efc6cc141df0biw=1280bih=888

Greetings,



These seem to suggest people using Google Chrome and/ or Firefox with 
lastpass installed are affected, as are those running 64 bit systems.  
None of these conditions apply to me though.


Someone reported the problem in Slackware and the jury still seems out 
regarding whether XOrg is the culprit or KDE opening too many sockets.  
Never having had this before, my only correlation - and only a 
correlation! - is I recently installed KOrganizer and AbiWord.  
Certainly it seems like a reasonable number of people have experienced 
the issue (dating back to ~2005), but there are no definitive solutions.


I guess that I will have to wait and see if once the machine has a 
comparable uptime (~10 days) see how many sockets are open and which 
processes can be killed if they are zombies.


Cheers

AG


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e6a25f7.2010...@gmail.com

How does one adjust the maximum number of clients reached using GTK libraries?

[AG]

Hi list

Today during a period when I had a number of various application windows 
open in Gnome on Debian stable (LibO, Iceweasel with about 6 tabs, 
acroread with 3 tabs, and Korganizer) I attempted to open an image using 
Geeqie.  This failed.  Using a terminal window I tried to open Geeqie 
again on the command line and this yielded a message (to the effect of) 
maximum number of clients reached and something about GTk.


However, after closing a window I could then use Geeqie.  This is really 
strange - my system is running 2.84Gb of RAM, and 2.8 Gb of swap so it 
surely cannot be a memory issue.  But I don't know what it is.  The 
current uptime just over 10 days.


Any ideas on what this is about would be gratefully received.

TIA

AG


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e691c69.9070...@gmail.com

lvm: error whilst loading shared libraries

[Glyn Astill]

Hi Guys,

I've just had an attempt at upgrading a machine from lenny to squeeze, however 
this machine as an lvm root volume.

Upon booting I now see the message:

lvm: error whilst loading shared libraries: libgcc_s.so.1: cannot open shared 
object file: no such file or directory

I'm guessing I'm missing some dependancy here, so far I can only boot to the 
initramfs userspace. Any ideas how I can move forward here?


I followed a guide at the url below on this machine that isn't vital, however 
I'm beginnig to wish I'd not bothered following that advice now.

http://www.howtoforge.com/upgrade-debian-lenny-to-squeeze-in-a-few-simple-steps








--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/419024.38995...@web26003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com

Re: lvm: error whilst loading shared libraries

[Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.]

On Monday 14 February 2011 09:56:55 Glyn Astill wrote:
 lvm: error whilst loading shared libraries: libgcc_s.so.1: cannot open
 shared object file: no such file or directory

Sounds like something got way too aggressive when removing packages.  Can you 
get into the system environment another way?  E.g. boot from a live CD mount 
up your filesystems and chroot.

That file should be provided by libgcc1, which a a Depend of libc6, which is a 
Depend of lvm2.  Check the status of those packages to make sure they are 
healthy.  If not, use aptitude, apt-get, or dpkg to repair them.  If so, I'd 
try a reinstall of those 3 packages, anyway.

Once that is straightened out, backup and rebuild your initrd, then try to get 
the system to boot under its own power again.

I'm using an LVM root volume on both a laptop and a desktop, so I know it 
works, but both of them were upgraded to squeeze rather incrementally.  The 
Lenny - Squeeze jump for both of the VPSes was a bit more rocky.

 http://www.howtoforge.com/upgrade-debian-lenny-to-squeeze-in-a-few-simple-s
 teps

I think the release notes were much more informative and the actual upgrade 
procedures documented there are not much longer than the article.

The article starts with lenny-volatile enabled, but doesn't end with squeeze-
updates enabled, which seems a bit wrong, too.
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net  ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Lua Libraries

[Roman Gelfand]

I am looking to install Lua Libraries on debian lenny.  How does one
go about find debian repository it is in?

Thanks in advance


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimtrkx4q3v=eoon-zp_quk9jbuzqeqofw4g6...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Lua Libraries

[Camaleón]

On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:45:51 -0500, Roman Gelfand wrote:

 I am looking to install Lua Libraries on debian lenny.  How does one go
 about find debian repository it is in?

It seems there are many libraries:

s...@stt008:~$ apt-cache search liblua | wc -l
77
 
Which one are you looking for?

Anyway, packages come from main repo:

s...@stt008:~$ apt-cache --full search liblua | grep -i filename | tail
Filename: pool/main/l/luabind/libluabind0_0.7.dfsg-5_amd64.deb
Filename: pool/main/l/luasocket/liblua-socket-doc_2.0.2-3_all.deb
Filename: pool/main/l/luasocket/liblua5.1-socket-dev_2.0.2-3_amd64.deb
Filename: pool/main/l/luasocket/liblua5.1-socket2_2.0.2-3_amd64.deb
Filename: pool/main/l/luasocket/liblua50-socket-dev_2.0.2-3_amd64.deb
Filename: pool/main/l/luasocket/liblua50-socket2_2.0.2-3_amd64.deb
Filename: pool/main/l/luasocket/luasocket-dev_2.0.2-3_all.deb
Filename: pool/main/l/luasocket/luasocket_2.0.2-3_all.deb
Filename: pool/main/r/rubyluabridge/libluabridge-ruby1.8_0.6.0-3_amd64.deb
Filename: pool/main/r/rubyluabridge/libluabridge-ruby_0.6.0-3_all.deb

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.12.22.18.32...@gmail.com

User-space libraries -- udev/hotplugs

[Stuckey]

I'm not subscribed to this list. Please reply directly to me.

Hi,

I'm writing a program that uses a library that isn't in Debian. I'm a
bit confused about something that is written in the product manual.
What I know is, if I want to run this particular USB device, I have to
do so as root. The manual says Applications typically have to be run
as root, or udev/hotplug must be configured to give permissions when
the Phidget is plugged in. The phidget is the USB device. Can someone
explain to me what this udev/hotplug is that they're talking about.
How can I set this up so that I don't have to run the device as root?

I'm not subscribed to this list. Please reply directly to me.

ciao
James


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimvqy+rgddwtjsvho2_rq+8dv5ffb5-fzpqm...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Any package instillation breaks libraries.

[jeremy jozwik]

On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 8:32 AM, jeremy jozwik jerjoz.for...@gmail.com wrote:
this is still happening.
ive narrowed it down to something within /etc /lib /lib32  or /lib64
so its not going bad from within the /usr directory.

the only instillations made this run were the recommended updates from
update manager.

# gedit /var/log/apt/term.log

Log started: 2010-08-19  06:43:21
(Reading database ... 148852 files and directories currently installed.)

Preparing to replace ghostscript 8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny4 (using
.../ghostscript_8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny5_amd64.deb) ...

Cleaning up font configuration of gs...

Cleaning up category psprint..

Cleaning up category cmap..

Cleaning up category cid..

Cleaning up category truetype..

Cleaning up category gsfontderivative..

Cleaning up category type3..

Cleaning up category type1..

Unpacking replacement ghostscript ...

Preparing to replace libgs8 8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny4 (using
.../libgs8_8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny5_amd64.deb) ...

Unpacking replacement libgs8 ...

Preparing to replace gs-common 8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny4 (using
.../gs-common_8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny5_all.deb) ...

Unpacking replacement gs-common ...

Preparing to replace ghostscript-x 8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny4 (using
.../ghostscript-x_8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny5_amd64.deb) ...

Unpacking replacement ghostscript-x ...

Preparing to replace gs 8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny4 (using
.../gs_8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny5_all.deb) ...

Unpacking replacement gs ...

Processing triggers for man-db ...

Setting up libgs8 (8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny5) ...

Setting up gs-common (8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny5) ...

Setting up ghostscript (8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny5) ...

perl: warning: Setting locale failed.

perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:

LANGUAGE = (unset),

LC_ALL = (unset),

LANG = en_US.UTF-8

are supported and installed on your system.

perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale (C).

perl: warning: Setting locale failed.

perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:

LANGUAGE = (unset),

LC_ALL = (unset),

LANG = en_US.UTF-8

are supported and installed on your system.

perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale (C).

perl: warning: Setting locale failed.

perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:

LANGUAGE = (unset),

LC_ALL = (unset),

LANG = en_US.UTF-8

are supported and installed on your system.

perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale (C).

perl: warning: Setting locale failed.

perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:

LANGUAGE = (unset),

LC_ALL = (unset),

LANG = en_US.UTF-8

are supported and installed on your system.

perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale (C).

perl: warning: Setting locale failed.

perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:

LANGUAGE = (unset),

LC_ALL = (unset),

LANG = en_US.UTF-8

are supported and installed on your system.

perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale (C).

Updating font configuration of gs...

Cleaning up category psprint..

Cleaning up category cmap..

Cleaning up category cid..

Cleaning up category truetype..

Cleaning up category gsfontderivative..

Cleaning up category type3..

Cleaning up category type1..

Updating category type1..

Updating category type3..

Updating category gsfontderivative..

Updating category truetype..

Updating category cid..

Updating category cmap..

Updating category psprint..

No CIDSupplement specified for BousungEG-Light-GB, defaulting to 0.

No CIDSupplement specified for Headline-Regular, defaulting to 0.

No CIDSupplement specified for UMingCN, defaulting to 0.

No CIDSupplement specified for Dotum-Regular, defaulting to 0.

No CIDSupplement specified for ShanHeiSun-Light, defaulting to 0.

No CIDSupplement specified for UKaiCN, defaulting to 0.

No CIDSupplement specified for Gulim-Regular, defaulting to 0.

No CIDSupplement specified for Batang-Regular, defaulting to 0.

No CIDSupplement specified for ZenKai-Medium, defaulting to 0.

Setting up ghostscript-x (8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny5) ...

Setting up gs (8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny5) ...

Log ended: 2010-08-19  06:44:43

i do still have a network connection, www.google.com and
ftp.us.debian.org are still ping-able but the gnome weather report and
iceweasel cannot be used for internet activities.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinghxsrrxsfjwtdkdzaamv+t_bjacl73d+ew...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Any package instillation breaks libraries.

[Tzafrir Cohen]

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 09:11:12AM -0700, jeremy jozwik wrote:
 I am having a very annoying issue at the moment. any time i install a
 package via apt / synaptic / aptitude my internet connection fails.

Before? After?

Dowloading the packages? Installing them?

 
 this issue is beyond me. but so far i have narrowed it down to the
 shared libraries folders going bad. 

Any specific error message?

 i have a stable backup of my
 system that i have been copying over to my machine each time it fails.
 frist was a full system restore except /home. next i restored only
 /etc /lib /lib32 /lib64 and /usr.
 this latest restore i only copied the libraries in /lib /lib32 /lib64
 and the usr folder libs.
 
 can anyone help me move past this issue. i dont know how installing
 some random package could destroy lib used by the internet connection
 or iceweasel. how can i avoid this issue and still be able to install
 packages?
 
 all packages are being pulled from the debian lenny repository...

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen | tzaf...@jabber.org | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il || a Mutt's
tzaf...@cohens.org.il ||  best
tzaf...@debian.org|| friend


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100815132810.gy17...@pear.tzafrir.org.il

Re: Any package instillation breaks libraries.

[jeremy jozwik]

On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@cohens.org.il wrote:
 Before? After?
 Dowloading the packages? Installing them?

after instillation.

 Any specific error message?

nothing that i can really see. in text. the only reason i know the
network has stopped functioning is my panel weather space displays a
-- and iceweasel cannot connect to any web. i can ping
www.google.com and get responses.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikzqz_g=q4ff1-kr-dxcxijuzfudgbb3mzrn...@mail.gmail.com

Any package instillation breaks libraries.

[jeremy jozwik]

I am having a very annoying issue at the moment. any time i install a
package via apt / synaptic / aptitude my internet connection fails.

this issue is beyond me. but so far i have narrowed it down to the
shared libraries folders going bad. i have a stable backup of my
system that i have been copying over to my machine each time it fails.
frist was a full system restore except /home. next i restored only
/etc /lib /lib32 /lib64 and /usr.
this latest restore i only copied the libraries in /lib /lib32 /lib64
and the usr folder libs.

can anyone help me move past this issue. i dont know how installing
some random package could destroy lib used by the internet connection
or iceweasel. how can i avoid this issue and still be able to install
packages?

all packages are being pulled from the debian lenny repository...


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktim+2shk27r9m3wu8ua9u0qrivvu3d74w5lic...@mail.gmail.com

Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgcc_s.so.1: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32

[AngelD]

El Tue, 10 Aug 2010 23:59:46 -0400
Robert J. Briones C. robert.brio...@gmail.com escribió:

 Estimados tengo un problema que me esta sacando de quisio..
 
 trataba de ejecutar un servidor de juegos en mi servidor . y tenia
 problemas con una librería . la libstdc++.so.5...
 buscando informacion y en el mismo README del servidor, decia que este
 error era tipico que habia que descargar la fuente de una direccion y
 copiarla en /lib si se tenia la seguridad de no remplazar nada.
 
 lo hice. la copia ahí y en /usr/lib/ ya que no funcionaba, y aún así
 no funcionaba.
 
 buscando mas información salia algo de una variable llamada
 LD_LIBRARY_PATH que habia que colocar un comando : export
 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/lib:/usr/lib para crear esa variable..
 
 lo hice y me funciono el juego...
 
 despues quise hacer un nmap para ver los puertos y ver por que puerto
 me lo habia levantado (estoy en prueba con este servidor), y resulta
 que me salió el siguiente error:
 
 nmap: error while loading shared libraries: libgcc_s.so.1: wrong ELF
 class: ELFCLASS32
 
 y cuando utlizo aptitude o apt. me sale lo mismo.
 
 he buscado mucha info y solo he encontrado alfo de un problema de
 ejecucion de 32 y 64 bits, pero nada mas

No entiendo exactamente tu divagación, pero para solucionarlo
probablemente te valga con instalar el paquete libstdc++5 o ia32-libs.

El error wrong ELF ELFCLASS32 suele ser fruto de intentar
utilizar binarios compilados para 32bits, en sistemas de 64.

Si todo esto no te funciona, tendrás que montar un entorno
chroot completo de 32bits, dentro de tu instalación, pero intuyo que
con instalar los paquetes anteriormente citados sea suficiente.

Saludos --- Angel


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100811104016.4bf1e...@x32

Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgcc_s.so.1: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32

[Robert J. Briones C.]

El día 11 de agosto de 2010 04:40, AngelD ang...@froga.net escribió:
 El Tue, 10 Aug 2010 23:59:46 -0400
 Robert J. Briones C. robert.brio...@gmail.com escribió:

 Estimados tengo un problema que me esta sacando de quisio..

 trataba de ejecutar un servidor de juegos en mi servidor . y tenia
 problemas con una librería . la libstdc++.so.5...
 buscando informacion y en el mismo README del servidor, decia que este
 error era tipico que habia que descargar la fuente de una direccion y
 copiarla en /lib si se tenia la seguridad de no remplazar nada.

 lo hice. la copia ahí y en /usr/lib/ ya que no funcionaba, y aún así
 no funcionaba.

 buscando mas información salia algo de una variable llamada
 LD_LIBRARY_PATH que habia que colocar un comando : export
 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/lib:/usr/lib para crear esa variable..

 lo hice y me funciono el juego...

 despues quise hacer un nmap para ver los puertos y ver por que puerto
 me lo habia levantado (estoy en prueba con este servidor), y resulta
 que me salió el siguiente error:

 nmap: error while loading shared libraries: libgcc_s.so.1: wrong ELF
 class: ELFCLASS32

 y cuando utlizo aptitude o apt. me sale lo mismo.

 he buscado mucha info y solo he encontrado alfo de un problema de
 ejecucion de 32 y 64 bits, pero nada mas

        No entiendo exactamente tu divagación, pero para solucionarlo
 probablemente te valga con instalar el paquete libstdc++5 o ia32-libs.

        El error wrong ELF ELFCLASS32 suele ser fruto de intentar
 utilizar binarios compilados para 32bits, en sistemas de 64.

        Si todo esto no te funciona, tendrás que montar un entorno
 chroot completo de 32bits, dentro de tu instalación, pero intuyo que
 con instalar los paquetes anteriormente citados sea suficiente.

        Saludos --- Angel


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100811104016.4bf1e...@x32



SOLUCIONADO
gracias amigo efectivamente ese era el problema, pero especificamente
con el paquete libgcc_s.so.1 solo tube que reinstalar con dpkg -i,
bajando el paquete de la pagina de debian .. y santo remedio ..

gracias amigo..


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinscrfcctq9kxykrgvt6fepbzy9954oth4px...@mail.gmail.com

iceweasel and its missing libraries.

[jeremy jozwik]

iceweasel has been very slow for me loading mail sites such as
mail.yahoo.com and gmail.com.

running in the terminal i get a load of errors:

/usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin: error while loading
shared libraries: libdirectfb-1.2.so.0: cannot open shared object
file: No such file or directory
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
/usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin: error while loading
shared libraries: libdirectfb-1.2.so.0: cannot open shared object
file: No such file or directory
/usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin: error while loading
shared libraries: libdirectfb-1.2.so.0: cannot open shared object
file: No such file or directory
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: failed to initialize plugin-side RPC
client connection
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NP_Initialize() invoke: Connection was NULL
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
/usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin: error while loading
shared libraries: libdirectfb-1.2.so.0: cannot open shared object
file: No such file or directory
/usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin: error while loading
shared libraries: libdirectfb-1.2.so.0: cannot open shared object
file: No such file or directory
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: failed to initialize plugin-side RPC
client connection
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NP_Initialize() invoke: Connection was NULL
/usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin: error while loading
shared libraries: libdirectfb-1.2.so.0: cannot open shared object
file: No such file or directory
/usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin: error while loading
shared libraries: libdirectfb-1.2.so.0: cannot open shared object
file: No such file or directory
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: failed to initialize plugin-side RPC
client connection
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NP_Initialize() invoke: Connection was NULL

ldd of npviewer.bin shows:
# ldd /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
linux-gate.so.1 =  (0xf7fa9000)
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 = /usr/lib32/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0xf7bdb000)
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 = /usr/lib32/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0xf7b4f000)
libgobject-2.0.so.0 = /usr/lib32/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (0xf7b12000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib32/libdl.so.2 (0xf7b0e000)
libglib-2.0.so.0 = /usr/lib32/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0xf7a58000)
libgthread-2.0.so.0 = /usr/lib32/libgthread-2.0.so.0 (0xf7a53000)
libX11.so.6 = /usr/lib32/libX11.so.6 (0xf7937000)
libXt.so.6 = /usr/lib32/libXt.so.6 (0xf78e7000)
libpthread.so.0 = /lib32/libpthread.so.0 (0xf78ce000)
libgcc_s.so.1 = /usr/lib32/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xf78b)
libc.so.6 = /lib32/libc.so.6 (0xf7768000)
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 = /usr/lib32/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 (0xf774f000)
libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 = /usr/lib32/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 (0xf7744000)
libXcomposite.so.1 = /usr/lib32/libXcomposite.so.1 (0xf7741000)
libXdamage.so.1 = /usr/lib32/libXdamage.so.1 (0xf773e000)
libXfixes.so.3 = /usr/lib32/libXfixes.so.3 (0xf7738000)
libatk-1.0.so.0 = /usr/lib32/libatk-1.0.so.0 (0xf771d000)
libcairo.so.2 = /usr/lib32/libcairo.so.2 (0xf76a6000)
libgio-2.0.so.0 = /usr/lib32/libgio-2.0.so.0 (0xf7639000)
libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 = /usr/lib32/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 (0xf7611000)
libpango-1.0.so.0 = /usr/lib32/libpango-1.0.so.0 (0xf75cd000)
libfreetype.so.6 = /usr/lib32/libfreetype.so.6 (0xf7555000)
libfontconfig.so.1 = /usr/lib32/libfontconfig.so.1 (0xf752a000)
libgmodule-2.0.so.0 = /usr/lib32/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (0xf7526000)
libm.so.6 = /lib32/libm.so.6 (0xf750)
libXext.so.6 = /usr/lib32/libXext.so.6 (0xf74f2000)
libXrender.so.1 = /usr/lib32/libXrender.so.1 (0xf74e8000)
libXinerama.so.1 = /usr/lib32/libXinerama.so.1 (0xf74e5000)
libXi.so.6 = /usr/lib32/libXi.so.6 (0xf74dc000)
libXrandr.so.2 = /usr/lib32/libXrandr.so.2 (0xf74d5000)
libXcursor.so.1 = /usr/lib32/libXcursor.so.1 (0xf74cc000)
libpcre.so.3 = /usr/lib32/libpcre.so.3 (0xf749a000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xf7faa000)
librt.so.1 = /lib32/librt.so.1 (0xf7491000)
libxcb.so.1 = /usr/lib32/libxcb.so.1 (0xf7478000)
libSM.so.6 = /usr/lib32/libSM.so.6 (0xf747)
libICE.so.6 = /usr/lib32/libICE.so.6 (0xf7458000)
libz.so.1 = /usr/lib32/libz.so.1 (0xf7443000)
libpixman-1.so.0 = /usr/lib32/libpixman-1.so.0

error while loading shared libraries: libgcc_s.so.1: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32

[Robert J. Briones C.]

Estimados tengo un problema que me esta sacando de quisio..

trataba de ejecutar un servidor de juegos en mi servidor . y tenia
problemas con una librería . la libstdc++.so.5...
buscando informacion y en el mismo README del servidor, decia que este
error era tipico que habia que descargar la fuente de una direccion y
copiarla en /lib si se tenia la seguridad de no remplazar nada.

lo hice. la copia ahí y en /usr/lib/ ya que no funcionaba, y aún así
no funcionaba.

buscando mas información salia algo de una variable llamada LD_LIBRARY_PATH
que habia que colocar un comando : export
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/lib:/usr/lib para crear esa variable..

lo hice y me funciono el juego...

despues quise hacer un nmap para ver los puertos y ver por que puerto
me lo habia levantado (estoy en prueba con este servidor), y resulta
que me salió el siguiente error:

nmap: error while loading shared libraries: libgcc_s.so.1: wrong ELF
class: ELFCLASS32

y cuando utlizo aptitude o apt. me sale lo mismo.

he buscado mucha info y solo he encontrado alfo de un problema de
ejecucion de 32 y 64 bits, pero nada mas

si alguien sabe como solucionarlo se lo agradecería

Saludos.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=t8z2us-1nacjfpoi+ohc9rabgccdcugduk...@mail.gmail.com

Missing many packages and libraries

[Brett Mahar]

Hi all,
I installed Debian a few days ago and had no trouble downloading extra
packages using apt-get. Then I re-installed today, and hardly anything
will work (Transmission did install). Any idea what is wrong?

My updated sources.list file:
deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 5.0.5 _Lenny_ - Official i386 CD Binary-1
20100626-17:37]/ lenny main
deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main
deb http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile lenny/volatile main
deb-src http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile lenny/volatile main
deb http://ftp.au.debian.org/debian/dists/lenny/ main contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/lenny/ main contrib non-free

I ran apt-get update (as root), then tried installing many things, eg:

debian:/home/brett# apt-get install mozilla-plugin-vlc
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  mozilla-plugin-vlc: Depends: vlc-nox (= 0.8.6.h-4+lenny2.3) but it
is not going to be installed
  Depends: vlc but it is not going to be installed
  Depends: libavcodec51 (= 0.svn20080206-8) but
it is not going to be installed or
   libavcodec-unstripped-51 (=
0.svn20080206-8) but it is not installable
  Depends: libvlc0 (= 0.8.6.h) but it is not
going to be installed
E: Broken packages


debian:/home/brett# apt-get install gstreamer-tools
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Couldn't find package gstreamer-tools


debian:/home/brett# apt-get install openoffice.org
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  openoffice.org: Depends: openoffice.org-core (=
1:2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny7) but it is not going to be installed
  Depends: openoffice.org-writer but it is not going
to be installed
  Depends: openoffice.org-calc but it is not going to
be installed
  Depends: openoffice.org-impress but it is not going
to be installed
  Depends: openoffice.org-draw but it is not going to
be installed
  Depends: openoffice.org-math but it is not going to
be installed
  Depends: openoffice.org-base but it is not going to
be installed
  Depends: openoffice.org-report-builder-bin but it is
not going to be installed
  Depends: ttf-liberation but it is not installable
  Depends: openoffice.org-officebean but it is not
going to be installed
  Depends: openoffice.org-writer2latex but it is not installable
  Depends: openoffice.org-filter-mobiledev but it is
not going to be installed
  Depends: openoffice.org-java-common ( 2.2.0-4) but
it is not going to be installed
  Recommends: openoffice.org-filter-binfilter but it
is not going to be installed
E: Broken packages

Thanks in advance!
Brett.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinbyyu3c9nap1yjfpjzxeeqqt9n0myke9hkx...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Missing many packages and libraries

[Timo Juhani Lindfors]

Brett Mahar brett.ma...@gmail.com writes:
 deb http://ftp.au.debian.org/debian/dists/lenny/ main contrib non-free
 deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/lenny/ main contrib non-free

These are wrong. Try with a sources.list that only has

deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ lenny main
deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main

and nothing else. Then post the output of apt-get update and apt-get
install gstreamer-tools.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84r5iamy3a@sauna.l.org

Re: Missing many packages and libraries

[Brett Mahar]

On 7 August 2010 22:00, Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi wrote:

 These are wrong. Try with a sources.list that only has

 deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ lenny main
 deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main

 and nothing else. Then post the output of apt-get update and apt-get
 install gstreamer-tools.


Thanks, Timo, this worked.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktim7awhu-f+vdb9ivo75_xyzay=uirs3iswy8...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Compiling libraries and gcc

[Kamaraju S Kusumanchi]

Marco Vittorini Orgeas wrote:

 I have read a lot about it, I tried also to export ,before issue the
 configure command, adjusted  CPPFLAGS,LDFLAGS,PKG_CONFIG_PATH pointing
 them respectively to folders under /opt/gtk/ /opt/glib etc...but it seems
 to have no effect (I read in another post that: LD_LIBRARY_PATH is  not
 needed when later running the built software due to libtool's use of
 rpaths).
 
 So,what is the right way to tell gcc (make) to use one or another library
 path when your system has two installed, one of which under /usr/lib and
 so will probably be used by default ?
 

I think LD_LIBRARY_PATH is what you are after. Also take a look at -B option
of gcc.

raju
-- 
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org