Re: Segmentation fault in Chromium
Am 02.10.2023 um 13:16:24 Uhr schrieb Richmond: > I received a segmentation fault from chromium. Would it be logged > anywhere? Install gdb and run it with that to get more information.
Re: Segmentation fault in top -b1 -hc
On 2017-05-09, Bob McGowanwrote: >> > I just tried the OP's command line and got the following error: > > $ top -b1 -hc > procps-ng 3.3.12 > Usage: > top -hv | -bcHiOSs -d secs -n max -u|U user -p pid(s) -o field -w [cols] > > I can say with assurance that I have not manually installed anything > related to procps or top. > > And the policy for procps says: > > $ apt-cache policy procps > procps: > Installed: 2:3.3.12-3 > Candidate: 2:3.3.12-3 > Version table: > > Those version numbers match the numeric part of the 'top' output. > > Could it be that Debian has just dropped the '-ng' from the name? > I'm reading that in 2011 Debian, Fedora and openSUSE forked procps (which became 'procps-ng'-- next generation). I guess the package has gone back to being called procps (or something)? https://gitlab.com/procps-ng/procps/wikis/faq -- "It might be a vision--of a shell, of a wheelbarrow, of a fairy kingdom on the far side of the hedge; or it might be the glory of speed; no one knew." --Mrs. Ramsay, speculating on why her little daughter might be dashing about, in "To the Lighthouse," by Virginia Woolf.
Re: Segmentation fault in top -b1 -hc
On 05/08/2017 03:28 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:46:13AM +0200, Peter Ludikovsky wrote: > > On 05/08/2017 11:19 AM, Valentin Bajrami wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> There is a segmentation fault when top is used as follow > >> > >> top -b1 -hc > >> > >> I think the args are not parsed properly. The version used is: > >> procps-ng version 3.3.10 > >> > >> -- > >> Met vriendelijke groet, > >> > >> Valentin Bajrami > > > There's no package procps-ng [0]. > > Indeed. There seems to be one props-ng floating around, but it doesn't > come from Debian's official repos. > > To find out where that package comes from, try > > apt-cache policy procps-ng-3.3.10 > > (or however that package is really called, you can find that out > with "aptitude search procps-ng" or something similar). > > HTH > -- tomás > I just tried the OP's command line and got the following error: $ top -b1 -hc procps-ng 3.3.12 Usage: top -hv | -bcHiOSs -d secs -n max -u|U user -p pid(s) -o field -w [cols] I can say with assurance that I have not manually installed anything related to procps or top. And the policy for procps says: $ apt-cache policy procps procps: Installed: 2:3.3.12-3 Candidate: 2:3.3.12-3 Version table: Those version numbers match the numeric part of the 'top' output. Could it be that Debian has just dropped the '-ng' from the name? Bob
Re: Segmentation fault in top -b1 -hc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:46:13AM +0200, Peter Ludikovsky wrote: > On 05/08/2017 11:19 AM, Valentin Bajrami wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There is a segmentation fault when top is used as follow > > > > top -b1 -hc > > > > I think the args are not parsed properly. The version used is: > > procps-ng version 3.3.10 > > > > -- > > Met vriendelijke groet, > > > > Valentin Bajrami > > There's no package procps-ng [0]. Indeed. There seems to be one props-ng floating around, but it doesn't come from Debian's official repos. To find out where that package comes from, try apt-cache policy procps-ng-3.3.10 (or however that package is really called, you can find that out with "aptitude search procps-ng" or something similar). HTH - -- tomás -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlkQSFkACgkQBcgs9XrR2kbX3gCfXDWfXzu0pWvamzNf/zhrB+oy FRoAnArOJblkZjkgdcqayi4spPSu6uMq =V0kt -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Segmentation fault in top -b1 -hc
On 05/08/2017 11:19 AM, Valentin Bajrami wrote: > Hi, > > There is a segmentation fault when top is used as follow > > top -b1 -hc > > I think the args are not parsed properly. The version used is: > procps-ng version 3.3.10 > > -- > Met vriendelijke groet, > > Valentin Bajrami There's no package procps-ng [0]. procps is version 3.3.9 in Stable, and 3.3.12 in Testing/Unstable [1]. Update to the current version, and if the problem persists please report the issue via the reportbug [2][3] utility. Regards /peter [0] https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=procps-ng [1] https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=procps [2] https://wiki.debian.org/reportbug [3] https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: segmentation fault when playing videos
Hi, Christian Hödl wrote: [...] vlc [...] Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. #0 0x7f1726489743 in av_freep () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libavutil.so.54 [...] xine [...] Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted. #0 0x7f79cd291107 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56 56 ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c: No such file or directory. Both look like (software) memory corruption. Usually caused by writing over the limits of an allocated piece of memory or by de-allocating allocated memory twice. The culprit is often hard to find because the memory management might need quite some time until it is rotten enough to crash. #0 0x7f79cd291107 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56 #1 0x7f79cd2924e8 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89 #2 0x7f79cd2cf204 in __libc_message (do_abort=do_abort@entry=1, fmt=fmt@entry=0x7f79cd3c1fe0 *** Error in `%s': %s: 0x%s ***\n) at ../sysdeps/posix/libc_fatal.c:175 Underneath xine, libc seems to have noticed the problem before it lead to a crash. I guess it issued a message and then deliberately threw signal 6 = SIGABRT (man 7 signal). A standard tool to catch the culprit is valgrind. Often awfully slow. So it might produce its own problems with video display. Nevertheless it might find the first memory abuse which starts the whole mess. valgrind xine ...xine.options... 21 | tee -i /tmp/valgrind_xine.log In any case the output will be useful if you file a bug report. Have a nice day :) Thomas
Re: Segmentation fault with iceape, etc.
On 20110413_202225, Javier Vasquez wrote: On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Don J d...@noark.net wrote: For a week or more, I've been having problems with iceape and a few other programs. As far as I can see, they get a segmentation fault and just disappear. From the debugging and back traces that I've done, it appears that I may be missing or have corrupted files relating to Gtk and GLib. Unfortunately, I'm not savvy enough to decipher the information and correct the problem. I could use a little assistance with this. I am running KDE and wheezy with the updated kernel 2.6.38-2-686 #1 SMP. The new kernel had no effect on the problem. Wheezy is up to date. iceape version is 2.0.13-1 Some of the operations which cause a seg fault include trying to send email with iceape (always), sometimes opening a particular web page will do it, and it appears the acroread will always do it (while other pdf readers will not). At times, gmail started from the iceape web browser will also fault. I'm only able to send email via using Google Chrome to start gmail. I installed iceape-dbg and followed the directions in the file at /usr/share/bug/iceape-dbg/presubj Starting iceape in safe mode with iceape -safe-more command line resulted in segmentation fault; following the suggestion to use the MOZILLA_DISABLE_PLUGINS=1 resulted in many warning and critical as you can see in the following screen capture: don@kali:~$ iceape -safe-mode Segmentation fault don@kali:~$ MOZILLA_DISABLE_PLUGINS=1 iceape (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-WARNING **: Error loading theme icon 'gtk-go-back-ltr' for stock: Icon 'gtk-go-back-ltr' not present in theme (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_default_render_icon: assertion `base_pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_style_render_icon: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-WARNING **: Error loading theme icon 'gtk-go-forward-ltr' for stock: Icon 'gtk-go-forward-ltr' not present in theme (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_default_render_icon: assertion `base_pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_style_render_icon: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-WARNING **: Error loading theme icon 'gtk-go-forward-ltr' for stock: Icon 'gtk-go-forward-ltr' not present in theme (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_default_render_icon: assertion `base_pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_style_render_icon: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-WARNING **: Error loading theme icon 'gtk-go-forward-ltr' for stock: Icon 'gtk-go-forward-ltr' not present in theme (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_default_render_icon: assertion `base_pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_style_render_icon: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed Segmentation fault don@kali:~$ I also ran gdb using the command line iceape -g which resulted in many lines and eventual segmentation fault. A bt was also done per instructions. I have this in a file if it would help diagnosing my problem, but I have a feeling that the above information may be adequate for someone to tell me if I am missing files or something. I also tried installing firefox and it too bombs out the same way as iceape, so my suspicion is iceape is OK and it is external file(s). Can someone interpret the warnings and critical stuff for me? I'm not a newbie, but I have little experience in this area. I do have two other problems that has recently popped up, and I do not know if they are related to this problem or not, but I'll mention just in case it should give any more clues: (1) iceape, when closed by either the X in upper right corner of KDE or thru file-exit, continues to
Re: Segmentation fault with iceape, etc.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Paul E Condon pecon...@mesanetworks.net wrote: On 20110413_202225, Javier Vasquez wrote: On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Don J d...@noark.net wrote: For a week or more, I've been having problems with iceape and a few other programs. As far as I can see, they get a segmentation fault and just disappear. From the debugging and back traces that I've done, it appears that I may be missing or have corrupted files relating to Gtk and GLib. Unfortunately, I'm not savvy enough to decipher the information and correct the problem. I could use a little assistance with this. I am running KDE and wheezy with the updated kernel 2.6.38-2-686 #1 SMP. The new kernel had no effect on the problem. Wheezy is up to date. iceape version is 2.0.13-1 Some of the operations which cause a seg fault include trying to send email with iceape (always), sometimes opening a particular web page will do it, and it appears the acroread will always do it (while other pdf readers will not). At times, gmail started from the iceape web browser will also fault. I'm only able to send email via using Google Chrome to start gmail. I installed iceape-dbg and followed the directions in the file at /usr/share/bug/iceape-dbg/presubj Starting iceape in safe mode with iceape -safe-more command line resulted in segmentation fault; following the suggestion to use the MOZILLA_DISABLE_PLUGINS=1 resulted in many warning and critical as you can see in the following screen capture: don@kali:~$ iceape -safe-mode Segmentation fault don@kali:~$ MOZILLA_DISABLE_PLUGINS=1 iceape (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-WARNING **: Error loading theme icon 'gtk-go-back-ltr' for stock: Icon 'gtk-go-back-ltr' not present in theme (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_default_render_icon: assertion `base_pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_style_render_icon: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-WARNING **: Error loading theme icon 'gtk-go-forward-ltr' for stock: Icon 'gtk-go-forward-ltr' not present in theme (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_default_render_icon: assertion `base_pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_style_render_icon: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-WARNING **: Error loading theme icon 'gtk-go-forward-ltr' for stock: Icon 'gtk-go-forward-ltr' not present in theme (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_default_render_icon: assertion `base_pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_style_render_icon: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-WARNING **: Error loading theme icon 'gtk-go-forward-ltr' for stock: Icon 'gtk-go-forward-ltr' not present in theme (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_default_render_icon: assertion `base_pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_style_render_icon: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed Segmentation fault don@kali:~$ I also ran gdb using the command line iceape -g which resulted in many lines and eventual segmentation fault. A bt was also done per instructions. I have this in a file if it would help diagnosing my problem, but I have a feeling that the above information may be adequate for someone to tell me if I am missing files or something. I also tried installing firefox and it too bombs out the same way as iceape, so my suspicion is iceape is OK and it is external file(s). Can someone interpret the warnings and critical stuff for me? I'm not a newbie, but I have little experience in this area. I do have two other problems that has recently popped up, and I do not know if they are related to this problem or not, but I'll mention just in case it should give any more clues: (1) iceape, when closed
Re: Segmentation fault with iceape, etc.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Don J d...@noark.net wrote: For a week or more, I've been having problems with iceape and a few other programs. As far as I can see, they get a segmentation fault and just disappear. From the debugging and back traces that I've done, it appears that I may be missing or have corrupted files relating to Gtk and GLib. Unfortunately, I'm not savvy enough to decipher the information and correct the problem. I could use a little assistance with this. I am running KDE and wheezy with the updated kernel 2.6.38-2-686 #1 SMP. The new kernel had no effect on the problem. Wheezy is up to date. iceape version is 2.0.13-1 Some of the operations which cause a seg fault include trying to send email with iceape (always), sometimes opening a particular web page will do it, and it appears the acroread will always do it (while other pdf readers will not). At times, gmail started from the iceape web browser will also fault. I'm only able to send email via using Google Chrome to start gmail. I installed iceape-dbg and followed the directions in the file at /usr/share/bug/iceape-dbg/presubj Starting iceape in safe mode with iceape -safe-more command line resulted in segmentation fault; following the suggestion to use the MOZILLA_DISABLE_PLUGINS=1 resulted in many warning and critical as you can see in the following screen capture: don@kali:~$ iceape -safe-mode Segmentation fault don@kali:~$ MOZILLA_DISABLE_PLUGINS=1 iceape (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-WARNING **: Error loading theme icon 'gtk-go-back-ltr' for stock: Icon 'gtk-go-back-ltr' not present in theme (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_default_render_icon: assertion `base_pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_style_render_icon: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-WARNING **: Error loading theme icon 'gtk-go-forward-ltr' for stock: Icon 'gtk-go-forward-ltr' not present in theme (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_default_render_icon: assertion `base_pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_style_render_icon: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-WARNING **: Error loading theme icon 'gtk-go-forward-ltr' for stock: Icon 'gtk-go-forward-ltr' not present in theme (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_default_render_icon: assertion `base_pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_style_render_icon: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-WARNING **: Error loading theme icon 'gtk-go-forward-ltr' for stock: Icon 'gtk-go-forward-ltr' not present in theme (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_default_render_icon: assertion `base_pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_style_render_icon: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (iceape-bin:3097): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed Segmentation fault don@kali:~$ I also ran gdb using the command line iceape -g which resulted in many lines and eventual segmentation fault. A bt was also done per instructions. I have this in a file if it would help diagnosing my problem, but I have a feeling that the above information may be adequate for someone to tell me if I am missing files or something. I also tried installing firefox and it too bombs out the same way as iceape, so my suspicion is iceape is OK and it is external file(s). Can someone interpret the warnings and critical stuff for me? I'm not a newbie, but I have little experience in this area. I do have two other problems that has recently popped up, and I do not know if they are related to this problem or not, but I'll mention just in case it should give any more clues: (1) iceape, when closed by either the X in upper right corner of KDE or thru file-exit, continues to operate. I have to kill the process in order to restart iceape several minutes later. (2) the icons on my desktop do not maintain their position if rebooted, and
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
lee schreef: On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 08:45:02AM +0200, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote: My quake3 copy is running fine with the 64-bit nvidia drivers. Without having the 32bit compatibility libraries installed? I have quake4 and don't know about quake3, but all games that aren't 64bit seem to need the 32bit drivers. The nivida driver seems to provide it's own libraries that replace the ones that come from somewhere else (with xorg, I guess). What's quake3 using? SDL? You could check the quake3 executable to see what it is (like: file quake3). /usr/local/games/quake3/quake3.x86: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (GNU/Linux), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.0.0, stripped Quake4 uses SDL and tries to load libGL.so.1, which it currently can't because it needs the 32bit version of that. I have a /usr/lib32/libGL.so.1 from the ia32-libs package apt-file search libGL.so.1 ia32-libs: /usr/lib32/libGL.so.1 ia32-libs: /usr/lib32/libGL.so.1.2 Yet, installing nvidia-glx-ia32 might also provide you with the necessary file: nvidia-glx-ia32: /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGL.so.1 nvidia-glx-ia32: /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGL.so.173.14.09 My understanding, though is that nvidia-glx-ia32 is for 32-bit xserver environments (eg. xfree86). I do not notice any problem with the version of libGL.so.1 I use. quake3 does something like 90 fps at the highest quality on my laptop. Openarena doesn't do much better.. Anyway, I've seen a forum post on the nvidia website saying that you're supposed to use the nvidia driver that comes in your distribution because it's supposed to be better integrated than the installer provided by nvidia. So how do I solve the dependency problems with that? Just install nvidia-kernel-source, nvidia-kernel-common and nvidia-glx. Ignore the dependency problem of nvidia-glx for now. Continue doing a module-assistant prepare, m-a auto-install nvidia. That gives you a compiled kernel module, which will be automatically installed. At this moment the dependencies for nvidia-glx will be met so it will automatically be configured as well. Use nvidia as your graphics card driver in xorg (or use nvidia-settings as a tool to create an xorg for you) and everything should work. At least, for me that's the case ;) Sjoerd signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
today I updated my testing installation. Now the 32bit part of the NVIDIA drivers doesn't work anymore I don't have 64bit strong hardware but it sounds like the problem I have after a Linux Kernel is upgraded. For Squeeze/Sid I'm showing: 2.6.30-2 (686) After the upgrade I can expect the 'nvidia' driver to fail. I edit the /etc/X11/xorg.conf file replacing 'nvidia' with xorg's 'nv' driver. This will return the 'desktop' minus 3D capabilities. As of 10-12 22:52 UTC, the nvidia-kernel-source is at 185.18.36.-2 When the n-v-source is upgraded, compile it with: # m-a -t clean,a-i nvidia-kernel-source Run another apt-get update for the new glx versions and other apt-get dist-upgrade to install them. Change the 'xorg.conf file back to 'nvidia' and all is well once more. Whether any of the above applies to your situation, I cannot say. -- CK -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
lee schreef: On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 01:36:58PM +0200, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote: lee schreef: On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:00:52PM -0700, David Fox wrote: More to the point, since you have an amd64 system, why bother with ia32 components? I don't recall any need for ia32 for nvidia. Where do you get a 64bit version of X3? Or X2? Quake? Doom? Tribal Trouble? And so on ... My quake3 copy is running fine with the 64-bit nvidia drivers. Without having the 32bit compatibility libraries installed? I have quake4 and don't know about quake3, but all games that aren't 64bit seem to need the 32bit drivers. Well, yes. This is what I've installed: i nvidia-glx i nvidia-kernel-2.6.31 i A nvidia-kernel-common i nvidia-kernel-source And looking at the frame rate I must have *some* hardware acceleration. Yet, I thought that the opengl support is in separate libraries, and that nvidia is just a driver. A program does not use drivers as libraries, is it? Don't you need 32 bit versions of either libgl1-mesa-dri or libgl1-mesa-glx? Using apt-file, quake3 need a libGL.so. I have /usr/lib32/libGL.so from the ia32-libs package. Sjoerd signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 08:45:02AM +0200, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote: My quake3 copy is running fine with the 64-bit nvidia drivers. Without having the 32bit compatibility libraries installed? I have quake4 and don't know about quake3, but all games that aren't 64bit seem to need the 32bit drivers. Well, yes. This is what I've installed: i nvidia-glx i nvidia-kernel-2.6.31 i A nvidia-kernel-common i nvidia-kernel-source And looking at the frame rate I must have *some* hardware acceleration. Yet, I thought that the opengl support is in separate libraries, and that nvidia is just a driver. A program does not use drivers as libraries, is it? Don't you need 32 bit versions of either libgl1-mesa-dri or libgl1-mesa-glx? Using apt-file, quake3 need a libGL.so. I have /usr/lib32/libGL.so from the ia32-libs package. Well, I don't know exactly how it works. You need a kernel module for the card, eventually another module for AGP or DRI (or what it was) depending on your mainboard (I think I have something compiled into the kernel to support the card) --- but I'm not sure if you still need that when you have the card in an extended-PCI slot rather than in an AGP slot. Besides that, you need some libraries that seem to provide OpenGL functions --- and that's probably the part relevant for the games: If they need that, I guess they need those libraries to be 32bit when they are 32bit and 64bit when they are 64bit because 32bit libraries don't go together with 64bit applications. The nivida driver seems to provide it's own libraries that replace the ones that come from somewhere else (with xorg, I guess). What's quake3 using? SDL? You could check the quake3 executable to see what it is (like: file quake3). Quake4 uses SDL and tries to load libGL.so.1, which it currently can't because it needs the 32bit version of that. Anyway, I've seen a forum post on the nvidia website saying that you're supposed to use the nvidia driver that comes in your distribution because it's supposed to be better integrated than the installer provided by nvidia. So how do I solve the dependency problems with that? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 08:01:47AM -0700, David Fox wrote: On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:46 PM, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote: Link where? :) I have a 9800GT. Oops, I forgot the link. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VDPAU Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 01:36:58PM +0200, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote: lee schreef: On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:00:52PM -0700, David Fox wrote: More to the point, since you have an amd64 system, why bother with ia32 components? I don't recall any need for ia32 for nvidia. Where do you get a 64bit version of X3? Or X2? Quake? Doom? Tribal Trouble? And so on ... My quake3 copy is running fine with the 64-bit nvidia drivers. Without having the 32bit compatibility libraries installed? I have quake4 and don't know about quake3, but all games that aren't 64bit seem to need the 32bit drivers. Good to know. Thanks X2 is working great, though (but I haven't played it on amd64, only x86)--- if you're interested in X3, you might want to start with X2. Maybe they get X3 fixed at some time. Both games are _very_ similar, which is a good thing. I didn't get very far with X3 yet because of the crashes and because it's running in slow motion, but it seems to be a very good successor. After having played X2, I was waiting like 2-1/2 years for X3 to find out how the story goes on. I hope they'll also port the others ... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 07:57:52AM -0700, David Fox wrote: I think I meant that you didn't need ia32 for nvidia. You'll of course need it for things that aren't available as 64-bit executables, or not available as source. Over here, that is a pretty short list, since I'm not into games much :). Indeed --- it's fine without the 32bit things, but without, the games won't work. I can wait because the game I want to play (X3) doesn't work anyway and they need to fix it first. But it bothers me having things working only 1/2 way. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:46 PM, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote: Then there would need to be only two packages: vdpau for those who need it, and the rest (which could suggest vdpau which could tell you which cards can use it). Doing that would probably not be possible, given the nature of this particular component. nvidia's drivers have always had a kernel-space component and a user-space component (the user-space component is nvidia-glx, the kernel is nvidia-kernel-source or variations thereof). Not having nvidia's drivers completely opem makes the process more complicated, since other drivers (intel, for example) have begun to put some of their code in the kernel proper, but essentially from the user's perspective it's a unified driver that exists totally in userspace. What complicates the matter further is that the kernel space part of the driver has to match the kernel you run. If you're on stable or testing then you might not have new versions of the kernel just popping up, but if you change the kernel, you have to rebuild the module. In some respect ubuntu automates this process - and perhaps debian does as well; I've not actively used nvidia since switching to intel back in December. But for instance, my virtualbox has a kernel space part and that gets automatically updated as part of the upgrade process any time the kernel changes. (And on karmic, new revs of the kernel are somewhat frequent.) But in general, separation of components is not uncommon. Sometimes documentation is separated from the executable, or a development set is separated from the libraries. That's to save on space, and not everyone who has a particular library needs the development component automatically installed. -- thanks for letting me change the magnetic patterns on your hard disk. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
lee schreef: On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:00:52PM -0700, David Fox wrote: More to the point, since you have an amd64 system, why bother with ia32 components? I don't recall any need for ia32 for nvidia. Where do you get a 64bit version of X3? Or X2? Quake? Doom? Tribal Trouble? And so on ... My quake3 copy is running fine with the 64-bit nvidia drivers. I got those from sid, by the way, and compiled them for a non-Debian kernel using 'm-a a-i nvidia' as suggested in the other thread. It also runs openarena which is a far superior opensource clone of quake3. I already told LGP a couple times that they need to make a 64bit version of X3 (even before it came out), but they refused and claim the 32bit version works just fine. But it doesn't work at all, it's running in slow motion and keeps crashing. For anyone who plans on buying that game, just don't. It's a nice game, but before they fixed these problems, it's a waste of money. If they don't fix it soon, they should take it back ... Good to know. Thanks Sjoerd signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:33 PM, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote: On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:00:52PM -0700, David Fox wrote: More to the point, since you have an amd64 system, why bother with ia32 components? I don't recall any need for ia32 for nvidia. Where do you get a 64bit version of X3? Or X2? Quake? Doom? Tribal Trouble? And so on ... I think I meant that you didn't need ia32 for nvidia. You'll of course need it for things that aren't available as 64-bit executables, or not available as source. Over here, that is a pretty short list, since I'm not into games much :). -- thanks for letting me change the magnetic patterns on your hard disk. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:46 PM, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote: Link where? :) I have a 9800GT. Oops, I forgot the link. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VDPAU Unfortunately, there's no roll-back option in aptitude ... or is there? If there was, there won't be any need to decide between stable, That would be nice. Installing the previous version (kept in /var/cache/apt/archives) did it for me. But rollbacks would be good. -- thanks for letting me change the magnetic patterns on your hard disk. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
lee a wrote : On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:17:53AM +0200, thveillon.debian wrote: lee a wrote: On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 07:41:47PM +0200, thveillon.debian wrote: cat:/home/lee# /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGLcore.so.1 Segmentation fault cat:/home/lee# the ia32-libs got seriously reworked has I understand, you can use the Sid version of nvidia's packages, and install the Debian way using module-assistant. You mean to install an older Debian package that has the nvidia drivers? I looked for nvidia packages, but there doesn't seem to be one that would compile things for the kernel I'm using. And I don't know what module-assistant is. No, you said you are using testing (Squeeze), just like I do, so I am not advising to install an older package but the current unstable (Sid) nvidia packages set that suit your hardware. Yeah, sorry, I don't keep track of the release names and get confused with them. I'm just using testing, it doesn't matter what its current name is ... The minimum you should have would be nvidia-kernel-common, nvidia-kernel-source (to build the kernel module with module-assistant), and after the module is built install also nvidia-glx[-ia32]. Which version of the driver do these contain? Would this compile the right things for the kernel I'm using? I currently have 185.18.36-2 from Sid installed, my package list look like : aptitude search ~S~i~nnvidia i nvidia-glx i nvidia-glx-ia32 i nvidia-kernel-2.6.31.2-vanilla64 this is the kernel module built with module-assistant, you won't find this one in your package manager i nvidia-kernel-common i nvidia-kernel-source i nvidia-libvdpau1 i nvidia-libvdpau1-ia32 i nvidia-settings i nvidia-xconfig Off course if you want the Sid version you need Sid main and non-free in your sources.list, and do package (or rather level) pinning to prevent a global switch to Sid. In simple words, create a /etc/apt/apt.conf file (or in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/), and put in it : APT::Default-Release testing; You can also do more fine-grained pinning in /etc/apt/preferences (to be created) OR /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/00preferences (to be created). Something like : Package: * Pin: release a=unstable Pin-Priority: 101 Should give you manual control over what's installed from Sid/unstable. Just google around for apt package pinning Why can't I just use the nvidia installer? What's the difference? If you do that directly it will build the default testing version, if you install Sid packages first, you can use m-a to build the Sid version, that's what I am using now on my Squeeze amd64 box. But I'm not using a Debian kernel. Neither am I, 2.6.31.2 here. It's working here, I tried the Nvidia (beta) script and it fails even in expert mode where you can choose install paths. Yeah, the nvidia installer seems to work just fine and puts the libraries into the right place. But the libraries are not executable anymore without yielding a segmentation fault. How do you test this, so that I can reproduce the tests here ? Well, just run the nvidia installer, it will say that some libraries cannot be found. When you look them up, they are available where they are supposed to be, but when you execute them, you get segmentation faults. Then run the nvidia installer again, but choose to not install the 32bit libs this time. That goes through without errors, and the libs that caused the problem before are gone. Nvidia installer complains, then goes on spreading bogus links all over the place, then the program tries to use 64bits libs in place of 32bits compat ones and fails. I am not a specialist in Nvidia driver internals, but it looks like it's seriously out of sync with Debian amd64 development right now. I am afraid it's more a problem with the proprietary nature of the Nvidia driver. If it sucks big time it will always be in last resort Nvidia's fault... Debian doesn't have to be tailored around proprietary programs just to meet their needs. It doesn't help users when things suddenly quit working. Sure it's frustrating, I hate when Skype or GoogleEarth go boom after an upgrade, but you've got to put the blame where it belongs. And all the more when running Testing or Sid, development and testing are what they are meant for. The web browsers don't work right anymore either and tend to crash now :( Instead of being improved, they got worse. What happened to the mozilla that included the email client and irc? Well, that's another problem, iceweasel works mostly OK here, maybe clean up your extensions/plugins ? There are way too many to do that --- or is there a list of all the packages I'd have to remove for that while somehow keeping the things I might want to keep installed and not have them removed due to dependencies? I'm not so sure if this is actually another problem rather than another symptom of the quality of Debian going down: First there isn't a web browser that works right
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:45:58AM +0200, thveillon.debian wrote: I currently have 185.18.36-2 from Sid installed, my package list look like : aptitude search ~S~i~nnvidia i nvidia-glx i nvidia-glx-ia32 i nvidia-kernel-2.6.31.2-vanilla64 this is the kernel module built with module-assistant, you won't find this one in your package manager i nvidia-kernel-common i nvidia-kernel-source i nvidia-libvdpau1 i nvidia-libvdpau1-ia32 i nvidia-settings i nvidia-xconfig Thanks! How did you figure out which packages you need? When I look at the description for nvidia-glx, it says binary drivers and leaves it totally unclear which kernel versions it supports. Besides, the version in testing doesn't even support my graphics card. It must be a couple years old ... Then look at the description for nvidia-glx-ia32: These XFree86 4.0 binary drivers provide optimized hardware acceleration of OpenGL applications via a direct-rendering X Server. I'm not on ia32, I'm on amd64. That can't be the right package, and when you look at the description, nvidia-glx does the same as nvidia-glx-ia32. And nvidia-kernel-common: This package contains files shared between NVIDIA module packages. For which kernel For which driver version??? nvidia-kernel-source: This package builds the NVIDIA Xorg binary kernel module needed by nvidia-glx. For which kernel For which driver version??? I don't know about vdpaul --- is that included in the nvidia installer? You see why I don't want to mess with all that? I've been downloading the installer from nvidias website and used that ever since I got my first nvidia card 10 years or so ago. Until now, it has been working just fine. Why are the package descriptions so poor, and why can't there just be one package you install? Off course if you want the Sid version you need Sid main and Since my card isn't even supported in testing, I'd have to get those packages from unstable. I've tried using packages from unstable a couple times, but the results haven't been good. non-free in your sources.list, and do package (or rather level) pinning to prevent a global switch to Sid. In simple words, create a /etc/apt/apt.conf file (or in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/), and put in it : APT::Default-Release testing; You can also do more fine-grained pinning in /etc/apt/preferences (to be created) OR /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/00preferences (to be created). Something like : Package: * Pin: release a=unstable Pin-Priority: 101 Should give you manual control over what's installed from Sid/unstable. Just google around for apt package pinning Well, that reminds me of getting an ATI mach32 to work with OS/2 (especially 3.0), and I really don't want to go back to that. That's why I keep buying nvidia: No problems to get them to work (until now). Really, it's funny: The ATI mach32 worked with OS/2 3.0 only for so long, then the driver suddenly quit working for no reason, and you had to go back and try to install it again. About 60% of the time you could; when you couldn't, you had to install OS/2 again. Now nvidia and Debian are almost the same. And if you ever tried OS/2 with an ATI mach32, you might understand how tired I am of this. Why can't I just use the nvidia installer? What's the difference? If you do that directly it will build the default testing version, if you install Sid packages first, you can use m-a to build the Sid version, that's what I am using now on my Squeeze amd64 box. But I'm not using a Debian kernel. Neither am I, 2.6.31.2 here. There doesn't seem to be a newer version of the nvidia driver available than 190.32. So what's the difference? Nvidia installer complains, then goes on spreading bogus links all over the place, then the program tries to use 64bits libs in place of 32bits compat ones and fails. I am not a specialist in Nvidia driver internals, but it looks like it's seriously out of sync with Debian amd64 development right now. Maybe that is because you mixed testing with unstable? I am afraid it's more a problem with the proprietary nature of the Nvidia driver. If it sucks big time it will always be in last resort Nvidia's fault... Debian doesn't have to be tailored around proprietary programs just to meet their needs. It doesn't help users when things suddenly quit working. Sure it's frustrating, I hate when Skype or GoogleEarth go boom after an upgrade, but you've got to put the blame where it belongs. And all the more when running Testing or Sid, development and testing are what they are meant for. So who is to blame? Obviously Debian changed something that made the nvidia driver stop working. That is very much like the kernel developers (or Debian developers, if you want to) making a change that makes 50% of the harddisks suddenly stop working, and your comment would be that the kernel (Debian) doesn't have to be tailored around proprietary hardware
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:45:58AM +0200, thveillon.debian wrote: I currently have 185.18.36-2 from Sid installed, my package list look like : aptitude search ~S~i~nnvidia i nvidia-glx i nvidia-glx-ia32 i nvidia-kernel-2.6.31.2-vanilla64 this is the kernel module built with module-assistant, you won't find this one in your package manager i nvidia-kernel-common i nvidia-kernel-source i nvidia-libvdpau1 i nvidia-libvdpau1-ia32 i nvidia-settings i nvidia-xconfig So I wanted to give this a try, with the packages that are in testing. But nvidia-glx-ia32 conflicts with libc6-ia32, and 95 packages depend on that. Using packages from unstable probably makes it worse. How did you solve that? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:27 AM, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote: cat:/home/lee# /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGLcore.so.1 Segmentation fault cat:/home/lee# You can't run a library directly. More to the point, since you have an amd64 system, why bother with ia32 components? I don't recall any need for ia32 for nvidia. Later you make a reference to nvidia-glx, and nvidia-glx-ia32 - they say they have the same functionality, but one is amd64 and the other one is ia32, for mixed 32 64 bit compatible systems. It's been a while since I ran debian, but I ran ubuntu 64 bit with their nvidia drivers (coming from Debian) and I don't recall any dependency on 32 bit stuff. There was some, but it was basically for things like googleearth etc. -- thanks for letting me change the magnetic patterns on your hard disk. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:59 PM, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote: And nvidia-kernel-common: This package contains files shared between NVIDIA module packages. Common refers essentially to support files., You should install the package, but it's not dependent on the driver or the version of the kernel. nvidia-kernel-source: This package builds the NVIDIA Xorg binary kernel module needed by nvidia-glx. For whatever kernel you have. It's tied to the specific release of the driver version, whatever that may be from testing/unstable. Since it is source, after you do a module-assistant auto-install, it'll compile that driver for the kernel you have. Since you have a non-standard kernel, there might be problems, but then again there may not be. I don't know about vdpaul --- is that included in the nvidia installer? vdpau is something that's special to some higher-end nvidia cards. You may not need that, depending on what card you have. The link here [1] itemizes supported cards. Why are the package descriptions so poor, and why can't there just be one package you install? It would be nice, but essentially you need three components, nvidia-glx, nvidia-common and nvidia-kernel-source. The first and third have to match as far as the driver revision, otherwise you get nasty messages from X. One of these should autoinstall nvidia-common since it may be dependent on the other two. But it's been sometime since I messed with nvidia (now using on board Intel graphics). Since my card isn't even supported in testing, I'd have to get those packages from unstable. I've tried using packages from unstable a couple times, but the results haven't been good. Using pinning and judicious use of aptitude install package -t unstable when only necessary should make things easier. There have been occasions when I needed the nvidia driver from (then) unstable. This was over a year ago when I was using an nvidia card on an old 32 bit system. Once it worked like a charm, the other time I found that the driver update had (wrongly) decided to include support for instructions that my processor did not support (movaps/movups). Turns out that the driver was compiled this way, and the only recourse to get it to work was to downgrade the package to the prior version. Since I now have an amd64 I can put such frustration behind me, but it's bitten me before several times. (My prior cpu was an Athlon Tbird/1000 which had some support for mmx/3dnow, but assumptions were made occasionally that said basically any modern 386 based system would support these instructions, and support for them only arrived in later versions of the AMD platform.) And it was with some other distributions at well. -- thanks for letting me change the magnetic patterns on your hard disk. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:00:52PM -0700, David Fox wrote: On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:27 AM, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote: cat:/home/lee# /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGLcore.so.1 Segmentation fault cat:/home/lee# You can't run a library directly. Oh. I thought you could --- some time ago, I was reading an article somewhere saying that they made it so that libs can be executed so that the lib would print some version information. But you're right, other libs report segfaults as well when I try. That means that there must be some other problem. Maybe I can figure it out tomorrow. More to the point, since you have an amd64 system, why bother with ia32 components? I don't recall any need for ia32 for nvidia. Where do you get a 64bit version of X3? Or X2? Quake? Doom? Tribal Trouble? And so on ... I already told LGP a couple times that they need to make a 64bit version of X3 (even before it came out), but they refused and claim the 32bit version works just fine. But it doesn't work at all, it's running in slow motion and keeps crashing. For anyone who plans on buying that game, just don't. It's a nice game, but before they fixed these problems, it's a waste of money. If they don't fix it soon, they should take it back ... Sure I'd like to turn off 32bit support in the kernel. The nvidia drivers work without, but drivers alone don't get you very far. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:13:57PM -0700, David Fox wrote: On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:59 PM, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote: And nvidia-kernel-common: This package contains files shared between NVIDIA module packages. Common refers essentially to support files., You should install the package, but it's not dependent on the driver or the version of the kernel. Then why doesn't the description say so? nvidia-kernel-source: This package builds the NVIDIA Xorg binary kernel module needed by nvidia-glx. For whatever kernel you have. It's tied to the specific release of the driver version, whatever that may be from testing/unstable. Since it is source, after you do a module-assistant auto-install, it'll compile that driver for the kernel you have. Since you have a non-standard kernel, there might be problems, but then again there may not be. Then the description should say so ... I don't know about vdpaul --- is that included in the nvidia installer? vdpau is something that's special to some higher-end nvidia cards. You may not need that, depending on what card you have. The link here [1] itemizes supported cards. Link where? :) I have a 9800GT. Why are the package descriptions so poor, and why can't there just be one package you install? It would be nice, but essentially you need three components, nvidia-glx, nvidia-common and nvidia-kernel-source. Then there would need to be only two packages: vdpau for those who need it, and the rest (which could suggest vdpau which could tell you which cards can use it). Since my card isn't even supported in testing, I'd have to get those packages from unstable. I've tried using packages from unstable a couple times, but the results haven't been good. Using pinning and judicious use of aptitude install package -t unstable when only necessary should make things easier. They _should_: That doesn't mean that they do. Aptitude has a nasty tendency to do things I don't want it to do. Now imagine what would happen if I tried to install the nvidia packages from unstable, given that in testing, they already break another package upon which 95 other packages depend. I might end up having to upgrade to unstable to solve all the dependency problems. Unfortunately, there's no roll-back option in aptitude ... or is there? If there was, there won't be any need to decide between stable, testing, unstable and experimental and you could try whatever combination might work. Just tell aptitude save this current stage, then try to find something that works, and if it doesn't just tell aptitude go back to the saved state. Are they at least working on that? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
lee wrote: Hi, today I updated my testing installation. Now the 32bit part of the NVIDIA drivers doesn't work anymore: The installer says it cannot find the libraries that are supposed to be in /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/. However, the libraries are there, but when I try to run them, I'm getting a segmentation fault: cat:/home/lee# /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGLcore.so.1 Segmentation fault cat:/home/lee# I'm using kernel 2.6.30 and have tried: NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-185.18.36-pkg2.run NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-190.32-pkg2.run The 64bit part seems to work fine, i. e. I can start the X server and everything is working, except 32bit software that needs the 32bit stuff. What could be causing this problem? It was working just fine before the update today. Hi, the ia32-libs got seriously reworked has I understand, you can use the Sid version of nvidia's packages, and install the Debian way using module-assistant. It's working here, I tried the Nvidia (beta) script and it fails even in expert mode where you can choose install paths. Hope it helps, Tom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 07:41:47PM +0200, thveillon.debian wrote: cat:/home/lee# /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGLcore.so.1 Segmentation fault cat:/home/lee# the ia32-libs got seriously reworked has I understand, you can use the Sid version of nvidia's packages, and install the Debian way using module-assistant. You mean to install an older Debian package that has the nvidia drivers? I looked for nvidia packages, but there doesn't seem to be one that would compile things for the kernel I'm using. And I don't know what module-assistant is. It's working here, I tried the Nvidia (beta) script and it fails even in expert mode where you can choose install paths. Yeah, the nvidia installer seems to work just fine and puts the libraries into the right place. But the libraries are not executable anymore without yielding a segmentation fault. Since it worked before, there must have been some change made in Debian packages --- but against which one(s) would I file a bug report? The web browsers don't work right anymore either and tend to crash now :( Instead of being improved, they got worse. What happened to the mozilla that included the email client and irc? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
lee a wrote: On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 07:41:47PM +0200, thveillon.debian wrote: cat:/home/lee# /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGLcore.so.1 Segmentation fault cat:/home/lee# the ia32-libs got seriously reworked has I understand, you can use the Sid version of nvidia's packages, and install the Debian way using module-assistant. You mean to install an older Debian package that has the nvidia drivers? I looked for nvidia packages, but there doesn't seem to be one that would compile things for the kernel I'm using. And I don't know what module-assistant is. No, you said you are using testing (Squeeze), just like I do, so I am not advising to install an older package but the current unstable (Sid) nvidia packages set that suit your hardware. The minimum you should have would be nvidia-kernel-common, nvidia-kernel-source (to build the kernel module with module-assistant), and after the module is built install also nvidia-glx[-ia32]. module-assistant (abbreviated m-a) is an helper package that can take care of the module build (and most thinks implied by it). Just use (after installing the package module-assistant of course) : m-a a-i nvidia-kernel as root, or just launch the ncurse interface with: m-a Of course man m-a is the place to start. If you do that directly it will build the default testing version, if you install Sid packages first, you can use m-a to build the Sid version, that's what I am using now on my Squeeze amd64 box. It's working here, I tried the Nvidia (beta) script and it fails even in expert mode where you can choose install paths. Yeah, the nvidia installer seems to work just fine and puts the libraries into the right place. But the libraries are not executable anymore without yielding a segmentation fault. How do you test this, so that I can reproduce the tests here ? Since it worked before, there must have been some change made in Debian packages --- but against which one(s) would I file a bug report? I am afraid it's more a problem with the proprietary nature of the Nvidia driver. If it sucks big time it will always be in last resort Nvidia's fault... Debian doesn't have to be tailored around proprietary programs just to meet their needs. The web browsers don't work right anymore either and tend to crash now :( Instead of being improved, they got worse. What happened to the mozilla that included the email client and irc? Well, that's another problem, iceweasel works mostly OK here, maybe clean up your extensions/plugins ? I think what you are looking for is the iceape program in Debian jargon, not sure about this since I have never used it. Tom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: segmentation fault with NVIDIA 32bit part
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:17:53AM +0200, thveillon.debian wrote: lee a wrote: On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 07:41:47PM +0200, thveillon.debian wrote: cat:/home/lee# /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGLcore.so.1 Segmentation fault cat:/home/lee# the ia32-libs got seriously reworked has I understand, you can use the Sid version of nvidia's packages, and install the Debian way using module-assistant. You mean to install an older Debian package that has the nvidia drivers? I looked for nvidia packages, but there doesn't seem to be one that would compile things for the kernel I'm using. And I don't know what module-assistant is. No, you said you are using testing (Squeeze), just like I do, so I am not advising to install an older package but the current unstable (Sid) nvidia packages set that suit your hardware. Yeah, sorry, I don't keep track of the release names and get confused with them. I'm just using testing, it doesn't matter what its current name is ... The minimum you should have would be nvidia-kernel-common, nvidia-kernel-source (to build the kernel module with module-assistant), and after the module is built install also nvidia-glx[-ia32]. Which version of the driver do these contain? Would this compile the right things for the kernel I'm using? Why can't I just use the nvidia installer? What's the difference? If you do that directly it will build the default testing version, if you install Sid packages first, you can use m-a to build the Sid version, that's what I am using now on my Squeeze amd64 box. But I'm not using a Debian kernel. It's working here, I tried the Nvidia (beta) script and it fails even in expert mode where you can choose install paths. Yeah, the nvidia installer seems to work just fine and puts the libraries into the right place. But the libraries are not executable anymore without yielding a segmentation fault. How do you test this, so that I can reproduce the tests here ? Well, just run the nvidia installer, it will say that some libraries cannot be found. When you look them up, they are available where they are supposed to be, but when you execute them, you get segmentation faults. Then run the nvidia installer again, but choose to not install the 32bit libs this time. That goes through without errors, and the libs that caused the problem before are gone. I am afraid it's more a problem with the proprietary nature of the Nvidia driver. If it sucks big time it will always be in last resort Nvidia's fault... Debian doesn't have to be tailored around proprietary programs just to meet their needs. It doesn't help users when things suddenly quit working. The web browsers don't work right anymore either and tend to crash now :( Instead of being improved, they got worse. What happened to the mozilla that included the email client and irc? Well, that's another problem, iceweasel works mostly OK here, maybe clean up your extensions/plugins ? There are way too many to do that --- or is there a list of all the packages I'd have to remove for that while somehow keeping the things I might want to keep installed and not have them removed due to dependencies? I'm not so sure if this is actually another problem rather than another symptom of the quality of Debian going down: First there isn't a web browser that works right anymore (since quite a while), then things that used to work just fine for like a decade (nvidia drivers) suddenly quit working and the web browsers got even worse at the same time. I think what you are looking for is the iceape program in Debian jargon, not sure about this since I have never used it. There doesn't seem to be an iceape package in testing. Perhaps the developers making mozilla stopped making it, but that leaves Debian without a working web browser. Neither galeon, nor iceweasel or firefox (which seems to be the same), let alone konqeror really work. And when you try to file a bug report, you're told not do it but to go to ridiculous lengths to figure out what's wrong yourself. Things used to just work in Debian, but they do that less and less. That isn't good. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Segmentation fault in dpkg and aptitude
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:44:42PM -0700, Bill Wohler woh...@newt.com was heard to say: You hit the nail on the head. I ran memtest86+. The original block of memory came out clean. The new Mushkin memory had thousands of errors. Never seen that before. Wonder if that was related to the earlier issues I had with aptitude/apt-get/dpkg? Maybe not since I hadn't seen the segmentation violation in any of them after running apt-get -f install twice. But maybe... Let's see if my workaround works for David K Jackson. Glad to hear you found your problem. Memory errors are pretty random and I suspect that you just were lucky after you ran apt-get -f install. In particular, apt tools rely a lot on memory-mapped files with internal pointers, so they would tend to be hit especially hard by bad RAM sticks. However, if all the data that the program uses is cached in good RAM, you should be able to run it without any problems. That would be my guess about what was happening. Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Segmentation fault in dpkg and aptitude
Bill Wohler woh...@newt.com writes: I found I was able to run apt-get -f install twice and be able to use aptitude to perform package maintenance again. However, now I'm finding that Emacs and Firefox (Iceweasel) die with segmentation faults at random times. Wonder if I'll get this email away... Has anyone seen these problems as a result of updating these packages? Here's a trimmed excerpt from /var/log/aptitude: [...] I'm sorry if this is not useful, but it sounds to me like your problem is an anomaly. None of the packages installed/upgrades (besides perhaps libx11) should be affecting Emacs or Firefox. So the question is, if you try to reinstall the broken packages, do they work? Again, I'm sorry if this wasn't useful, but I saw that no one else responded so I figured I'd at least chime in. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Segmentation fault in dpkg and aptitude
pob...@fuzzydev.org writes: Bill Wohler woh...@newt.com writes: I found I was able to run apt-get -f install twice and be able to use aptitude to perform package maintenance again. However, now I'm finding that Emacs and Firefox (Iceweasel) die with segmentation faults at random times. Wonder if I'll get this email away... Has anyone seen these problems as a result of updating these packages? Here's a trimmed excerpt from /var/log/aptitude: [...] I'm sorry if this is not useful, but it sounds to me like your problem is an anomaly. None of the packages installed/upgrades (besides perhaps libx11) should be affecting Emacs or Firefox. So the question is, if you try to reinstall the broken packages, do they work? That's worth a shot, thanks. On the other hand, Emacs and Firefox were still running this morning... Weird. -- Bill Wohler woh...@newt.com http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Segmentation fault in dpkg and aptitude
pob...@fuzzydev.org writes: Bill Wohler woh...@newt.com writes: I found I was able to run apt-get -f install twice and be able to use aptitude to perform package maintenance again. However, now I'm finding that Emacs and Firefox (Iceweasel) die with segmentation faults at random times. Wonder if I'll get this email away... Has anyone seen these problems as a result of updating these packages? Here's a trimmed excerpt from /var/log/aptitude: [...] I'm sorry if this is not useful, but it sounds to me like your problem is an anomaly. None of the packages installed/upgrades (besides perhaps libx11) should be affecting Emacs or Firefox. So the question is, if you try to reinstall the broken packages, do they work? That's worth a shot, thanks. On the other hand, Emacs and Firefox were still running this morning... Weird. The only problem I can see is if a program that runs in the background is segfaulting and you don't know. I'd check your logs as often as possible. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Segmentation fault in dpkg and aptitude
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 09:48:37PM -0700, Bill Wohler woh...@newt.com was heard to say: Bill Wohler woh...@newt.com writes: After making the following changes to pull in sid's bluez 4.0 package in a lenny system, I'm now getting segmentation faults when I run dpkg and aptitude. Any thoughts on how to recover from this? I found I was able to run apt-get -f install twice and be able to use aptitude to perform package maintenance again. However, now I'm finding that Emacs and Firefox (Iceweasel) die with segmentation faults at random times. Wonder if I'll get this email away... It sounds like bad memory to me. Have you tried running a memory checker? Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Segmentation fault in dpkg and aptitude
Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org writes: On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 09:48:37PM -0700, Bill Wohler woh...@newt.com was heard to say: Bill Wohler woh...@newt.com writes: After making the following changes to pull in sid's bluez 4.0 package in a lenny system, I'm now getting segmentation faults when I run dpkg and aptitude. Any thoughts on how to recover from this? I found I was able to run apt-get -f install twice and be able to use aptitude to perform package maintenance again. However, now I'm finding that Emacs and Firefox (Iceweasel) die with segmentation faults at random times. Wonder if I'll get this email away... It sounds like bad memory to me. Have you tried running a memory checker? Thanks, Daniel. No I haven't since it hadn't occurred to me: the machine is new and I just added some good quality Mushkin memory. I'll try memtester, although the documentation says it won't be able to test all 8 GB of my memory. Then I'll try memtest86+ when I'm not using the machine. It's been a long, long time since I've used these. Any other suggestions? -- Bill Wohler woh...@newt.com http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Segmentation fault in dpkg and aptitude
Bill Wohler wrote: Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org writes: On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 09:48:37PM -0700, Bill Wohler woh...@newt.com was heard to say: Bill Wohler woh...@newt.com writes: After making the following changes to pull in sid's bluez 4.0 package in a lenny system, I'm now getting segmentation faults when I run dpkg and aptitude. Any thoughts on how to recover from this? I found I was able to run apt-get -f install twice and be able to use aptitude to perform package maintenance again. However, now I'm finding that Emacs and Firefox (Iceweasel) die with segmentation faults at random times. Wonder if I'll get this email away... It sounds like bad memory to me. Have you tried running a memory checker? Thanks, Daniel. No I haven't since it hadn't occurred to me: the machine is new and I just added some good quality Mushkin memory. I'll try memtester, although the documentation says it won't be able to test all 8 GB of my memory. Then I'll try memtest86+ when I'm not using the machine. It's been a long, long time since I've used these. Any other suggestions? I was getting segfaults when trying to boot, it was an init script running tput. I ran a reinstall on a few things and it went away. Mark Allums -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Segmentation fault in dpkg and aptitude
Bill Wohler woh...@newt.com writes: Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org writes: On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 09:48:37PM -0700, Bill Wohler woh...@newt.com was heard to say: Bill Wohler woh...@newt.com writes: After making the following changes to pull in sid's bluez 4.0 package in a lenny system, I'm now getting segmentation faults when I run dpkg and aptitude. Any thoughts on how to recover from this? I found I was able to run apt-get -f install twice and be able to use aptitude to perform package maintenance again. However, now I'm finding that Emacs and Firefox (Iceweasel) die with segmentation faults at random times. Wonder if I'll get this email away... It sounds like bad memory to me. Have you tried running a memory checker? Thanks, Daniel. No I haven't since it hadn't occurred to me: the machine is new and I just added some good quality Mushkin memory. I'll try memtester, although the documentation says it won't be able to test all 8 GB of my memory. Then I'll try memtest86+ when I'm not using the machine. It's been a long, long time since I've used these. Any other suggestions? Daniel, You hit the nail on the head. I ran memtest86+. The original block of memory came out clean. The new Mushkin memory had thousands of errors. Never seen that before. Wonder if that was related to the earlier issues I had with aptitude/apt-get/dpkg? Maybe not since I hadn't seen the segmentation violation in any of them after running apt-get -f install twice. But maybe... Let's see if my workaround works for David K Jackson. -- Bill Wohler woh...@newt.com http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Segmentation fault in dpkg and aptitude
Bill Wohler woh...@newt.com writes: After making the following changes to pull in sid's bluez 4.0 package in a lenny system, I'm now getting segmentation faults when I run dpkg and aptitude. Any thoughts on how to recover from this? I found I was able to run apt-get -f install twice and be able to use aptitude to perform package maintenance again. However, now I'm finding that Emacs and Firefox (Iceweasel) die with segmentation faults at random times. Wonder if I'll get this email away... Has anyone seen these problems as a result of updating these packages? Here's a trimmed excerpt from /var/log/aptitude: Aptitude 0.4.11.11: log report Sun, Jul 19 2009 12:33:18 -0700 [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] libbluetooth3 [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] libnl1 [INSTALL] bluez [UPGRADE] bluez-utils 3.36-3 - 4.42-2 Aptitude 0.4.11.11: log report Sun, Jul 19 2009 12:51:29 -0700 [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] consolekit [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] libck-connector0 [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] libpam-ck-connector [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] libpolkit-dbus2 [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] libpolkit-gnome0 [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] libpolkit-grant2 [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] libpolkit2 [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] libxcb-atom1 [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] libxcb-aux0 [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] libxcb-event1 [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] obex-data-server [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] policykit [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] policykit-gnome [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] python-pyrex [REMOVE, DEPENDENCIES] bluez-gnome [REMOVE, DEPENDENCIES] libxcb-xlib0 [REMOVE, DEPENDENCIES] libxcb-xlib0-dev [INSTALL] blueman [UPGRADE] libstartup-notification0 0.9-1 - 0.10-1 [UPGRADE] libx11-6 2:1.1.5-2 - 2:1.2.1-1 [UPGRADE] libx11-dev 2:1.1.5-2 - 2:1.2.1-1 [UPGRADE] libxcb1 1.1-1.2 - 1.3-2 [UPGRADE] libxcb1-dev 1.1-1.2 - 1.3-2 -- Bill Wohler woh...@newt.com http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Segmentation fault when stating aptitude
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 18:26:25 -0500, Jacques Dery (de...@inforco.com) wrote: Thank you for the suggestion but the problem still exists. Here is the output de...@gontran:/var/cache/apt$ sudo rm pkgcache.bin de...@gontran:/var/cache/apt$ ls -ails total 12 160066 4 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2009-03-02 18:13 . 160006 4 drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 2009-02-26 06:27 .. 160073 4 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2009-03-02 17:52 archives de...@gontran:/var/cache/apt$ sudo aptitude update Get:1 http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release.gpg [189B] Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release Get:2 http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch Release.gpg [386B] Hit http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch Release Ign http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://security.debian.org etch/updates/contrib Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Sources/DiffIndex Ign http://security.debian.org etch/updates/contrib Sources/DiffIndex Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Packages Ign http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch/main Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates/contrib Packages Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Sources Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates/contrib Sources Ign http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch/contrib Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch/main Packages Hit http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch/contrib Packages Get:3 http://http.us.debian.org stable Release.gpg [386B] Hit http://http.us.debian.org stable Release Ign http://http.us.debian.org stable/main Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://http.us.debian.org stable/contrib Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://http.us.debian.org stable/non-free Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://http.us.debian.org stable/main Packages Hit http://http.us.debian.org stable/contrib Packages Hit http://http.us.debian.org stable/non-free Packages I notice that you are getting updates and security updates for etch but also updates for stable (lenny) with no corresponding security updates. Are you intentionally mixing etch and lenny using pinning or a APT::Default-Release setting? Just a thought. -- Bob Cox. Stoke Gifford, near Bristol, UK. Please reply to the list only. Do NOT send copies directly to me. Debian on the NSLU2: http://bobcox.com/slug/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Segmentation fault when stating aptitude
Thank you for the suggestion but the problem still exists. Here is the output de...@gontran:/var/cache/apt$ sudo rm pkgcache.bin de...@gontran:/var/cache/apt$ ls -ails total 12 160066 4 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2009-03-02 18:13 . 160006 4 drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 2009-02-26 06:27 .. 160073 4 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2009-03-02 17:52 archives de...@gontran:/var/cache/apt$ sudo aptitude update Get:1 http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release.gpg [189B] Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release Get:2 http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch Release.gpg [386B] Hit http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch Release Ign http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://security.debian.org etch/updates/contrib Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Sources/DiffIndex Ign http://security.debian.org etch/updates/contrib Sources/DiffIndex Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Packages Ign http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch/main Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates/contrib Packages Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Sources Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates/contrib Sources Ign http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch/contrib Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch/main Packages Hit http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch/contrib Packages Get:3 http://http.us.debian.org stable Release.gpg [386B] Hit http://http.us.debian.org stable Release Ign http://http.us.debian.org stable/main Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://http.us.debian.org stable/contrib Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://http.us.debian.org stable/non-free Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://http.us.debian.org stable/main Packages Hit http://http.us.debian.org stable/contrib Packages Hit http://http.us.debian.org stable/non-free Packages Fetched 3B in 3s (1B/s) Segmentation faultsts... 90% I am not sure what is the next step. Any other way out of this? Thank you Jacques -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Segmentation fault when stating aptitude
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 11:29:30AM -0500, Jacques Dery de...@inforco.com was heard to say: I tried running apt-get update and aptitude from the commandline with the same result. I looked at the man page. I tried a few commands without result. I am weary going further because I am playing with root and risk doing more damage on the system. I would suggest removing /var/cache/apt/*.bin and seeing if that helps at all. (run aptitude update after you do that) Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Segmentation Fault
Esse erro está dando na hora da instalação certo? Não é normal, devido que esse erro ocorre quando um processo tenta acessar um local da memória ao qual não foi alocado para ele, como é na instalação da para suspeitar que deve ter algum problema de hardware, ja passou um teste de memória? A[]'s Fábio de Sousa escreveu: Boa tarde, amigos debianos... Estou tentando instalar o debian lenny, mas o erro também já aconteceu com o etch! Estas são as ultimas quatro linhas do log de erro: debootstrap: Segmentation fault debootstrap: ar: can't open' ./var/cache/apt/archive/libstdc++6_4.3.2.2_i386.deb': no such file or directory debootstrap: zcat: short read debootstrap: tar: short read Soluções já tentadas: 1 - Instalar com Cd NetInstall 2 - Instalar com Cd Business 3 - Troquei o Hd por três vezes 4 - Troquei memória 5 - Troquei leitora de CD. Em todas as situações aparecem erros parecidos, e todos com esta mensagem em comum: SEGMENTATION FAULT Alguém saberia me dizer com resolvo, isso? Grato, Fábiocs -- Seja Livre! Use Linux De preferência o Debian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: segmentation fault but why?
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 13:39:12 -0500, chris dunn wrote: Running scanimage -L as root (su) yields the correct answer and identifies my scanner. Running scanimage -L as user yields Segmentation fault only. Does anyone have a suggestion as to why this might be, and how I can identify the reason for the problem? Install the strace package if you do not have it already. Run as the normal user: strace -f scanimage -L 2scanimage.strace Then you can check the end of the file scanimage.strace for clues. If you cannot make sense of it then you can send the output of tail -n50 scanimage.strace to this list. (Please do NOT post the entire strace file!) -- Regards,| http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer Florian | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation fault al hacer un ls en Sarge
On 8/2/07, Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hola, de repente en un servidor Sarge en producción falla casi todo. Doy por hecho que el problema tiene mucho que ver con que ni siquiera se puede hacer un ls: ~# ls Segmentation fault Recuerdo que en ocasiones se me dañaron comandos como ls por cerrar mal el sistema operativo o por haber ejecutado un comando enviado por aquellos que quieren ingresar vía ssh a la fuerza :$, con debsum detecté los archivos que se corrompieron.
Re: Segmentation fault al hacer un ls en Sarge
El Viernes, 3 de Agosto de 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: On 8/2/07, Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hola, de repente en un servidor Sarge en producción falla casi todo. Doy por hecho que el problema tiene mucho que ver con que ni siquiera se puede hacer un ls: ~# ls Segmentation fault Recuerdo que en ocasiones se me dañaron comandos como ls por cerrar mal el sistema operativo o por haber ejecutado un comando enviado por aquellos que quieren ingresar vía ssh a la fuerza :$, con debsum detecté los archivos que se corrompieron. Vaya, gracias, lo tendré en cuenta para otra ocasión, ahora ya el servidor ha sido reemplazado ;) Gracias. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo
Re: Segmentation fault al hacer un ls en Sarge
El 2/08/07, Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Hola, de repente en un servidor Sarge en producción falla casi todo. Doy por hecho que el problema tiene mucho que ver con que ni siquiera se puede hacer un ls: ~# ls Segmentation fault Recuerdo que una vez me pasó lo mismo en otro equipo, aunque sólo a partir de un directorio, y recuerdo que lo corregí borrando algún archivo (no lo recuerdo muy bien). Pero claro, ahora la situación es mucho más grave, y servicios no pueden escribir en /tmp (tal vez porque intentan leer antes...). Pego un strace ls: /# strace ls execve(/bin/ls, [ls], [/* 18 vars */]) = 0 uname({sys=Linux, node=linux, ...}) = 0 brk(0) = 0x805b000 old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40017000 access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/etc/ld.so.preload, O_RDONLY)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/etc/ld.so.cache, O_RDONLY) = 3 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=16546, ...}) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 16546, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40018000 close(3)= 0 access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/lib/tls/librt.so.1, O_RDONLY) = 3 read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\220\32..., 512) = 512 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=22940, ...}) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 21588, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4001d000 old_mmap(0x40022000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0x5000) = 0x40022000 close(3)= 0 access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/lib/libacl.so.1, O_RDONLY) = 3 read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\300\24..., 512) = 512 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=22336, ...}) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 25412, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40023000 old_mmap(0x40029000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0x5000) = 0x40029000 close(3)= 0 access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/lib/tls/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY)= 3 read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0`Z\1\000..., 512) = 512 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=1254660, ...}) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x4002a000 old_mmap(NULL, 1264972, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4002b000 old_mmap(0x40155000, 36864, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0x129000) = 0x40155000 old_mmap(0x4015e000, 7500, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x4015e000 close(3)= 0 access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/lib/tls/libpthread.so.0, O_RDONLY) = 3 read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0pF\0\000..., 512) = 512 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=78233, ...}) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 60772, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4016 old_mmap(0x4016c000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0xc000) = 0x4016c000 old_mmap(0x4016d000, 7524, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x4016d000 close(3)= 0 access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/lib/libattr.so.1, O_RDONLY) = 3 read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\340\r\0..., 512) = 512 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=10824, ...}) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 13892, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4016f000 old_mmap(0x40172000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0x2000) = 0x40172000 close(3)= 0 old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40173000 set_thread_area({entry_number:-1 - 6, base_addr:0x401732a0, limit:1048575, seg_32bit:1, contents:0, read_exec_only:0, limit_in_pages:1, seg_not_present:0, useable:1}) = 0 munmap(0x40018000, 16546) = 0 set_tid_address(0x401732e8) = 32513 rt_sigaction(SIGRTMIN, {0x401645d0, [], SA_SIGINFO}, NULL, 8) = 0 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, [RTMIN], NULL, 8) = 0 getrlimit(RLIMIT_STACK, {rlim_cur=8192*1024, rlim_max=RLIM_INFINITY}) = 0 --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) --- +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++ ¿Alguna sugerencia? Mil gracias. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Si no ha habido actualización de por medio, el problema tiene que ser hardware. Probaría a pasarle un memtest para ver la ram y/o probar con otro disco duro. A mi me pasó algo similiar con un servidor y tras muchas pruebas, era un módulo de ram que había cascado. Suerte -- ... may the source be with you...
Re: Segmentation fault al hacer un ls en Sarge
On 8/2/07, ChEnChO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: El 2/08/07, Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Hola, de repente en un servidor Sarge en producción falla casi todo. Doy por hecho que el problema tiene mucho que ver con que ni siquiera se puede hacer un ls: ~# ls Segmentation fault Recuerdo que una vez me pasó lo mismo en otro equipo, aunque sólo a partir de un directorio, y recuerdo que lo corregí borrando algún archivo (no lo recuerdo muy bien). Pero claro, ahora la situación es mucho más grave, y servicios no pueden escribir en /tmp (tal vez porque intentan leer antes...). Pego un strace ls: /# strace ls execve(/bin/ls, [ls], [/* 18 vars */]) = 0 uname({sys=Linux, node=linux, ...}) = 0 brk(0) = 0x805b000 old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40017000 access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/etc/ld.so.preload, O_RDONLY)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/etc/ld.so.cache, O_RDONLY) = 3 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=16546, ...}) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 16546, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40018000 close(3)= 0 access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/lib/tls/librt.so.1, O_RDONLY) = 3 read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\220\32..., 512) = 512 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=22940, ...}) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 21588, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4001d000 old_mmap(0x40022000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0x5000) = 0x40022000 close(3)= 0 access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/lib/libacl.so.1, O_RDONLY) = 3 read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\300\24..., 512) = 512 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=22336, ...}) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 25412, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40023000 old_mmap(0x40029000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0x5000) = 0x40029000 close(3)= 0 access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/lib/tls/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY)= 3 read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0`Z\1\000..., 512) = 512 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=1254660, ...}) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x4002a000 old_mmap(NULL, 1264972, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4002b000 old_mmap(0x40155000, 36864, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0x129000) = 0x40155000 old_mmap(0x4015e000, 7500, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x4015e000 close(3)= 0 access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/lib/tls/libpthread.so.0, O_RDONLY) = 3 read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0pF\0\000..., 512) = 512 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=78233, ...}) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 60772, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4016 old_mmap(0x4016c000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0xc000) = 0x4016c000 old_mmap(0x4016d000, 7524, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x4016d000 close(3)= 0 access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/lib/libattr.so.1, O_RDONLY) = 3 read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\340\r\0..., 512) = 512 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=10824, ...}) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 13892, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4016f000 old_mmap(0x40172000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0x2000) = 0x40172000 close(3)= 0 old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40173000 set_thread_area({entry_number:-1 - 6, base_addr:0x401732a0, limit:1048575, seg_32bit:1, contents:0, read_exec_only:0, limit_in_pages:1, seg_not_present:0, useable:1}) = 0 munmap(0x40018000, 16546) = 0 set_tid_address(0x401732e8) = 32513 rt_sigaction(SIGRTMIN, {0x401645d0, [], SA_SIGINFO}, NULL, 8) = 0 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, [RTMIN], NULL, 8) = 0 getrlimit(RLIMIT_STACK, {rlim_cur=8192*1024, rlim_max=RLIM_INFINITY}) = 0 --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) --- +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++ ¿Alguna sugerencia? Mil gracias. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Si no ha habido actualización de por medio, el problema tiene que ser hardware. Probaría a pasarle un memtest para ver la ram y/o probar con otro disco duro. A mi me pasó algo
Re: Segmentation fault al hacer un ls en Sarge
El 2/08/07, ChEnChO [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Si no ha habido actualización de por medio, el problema tiene que ser hardware. No ha habido nada en principio. Probaría a pasarle un memtest para ver la ram y/o probar con otro disco duro. Vale, lo único, he probado memtest all (que es como interpreto se debe ejecutar el comando) y me ah colgado la máquina, ¿cómo debería ejecutarlo? A mi me pasó algo similiar con un servidor y tras muchas pruebas, era un módulo de ram que había cascado. Tomo nota, y agradezco tu ayuda ya que es una situación urgente que tendré que ir ahora a revisar :X -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation fault al hacer un ls en Sarge
El 2/08/07, Adrià [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Yo por mi parte te recomendaría mirar la integridad del disco duro, ya que esto fue lo que le pasó a uno de mis servidores. Por suerte, con un disco nuevo y los backups, en un día lo tuve funcionando :) ¿Por ejemplo un badblocks desde un live-cd? Gracias. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation fault al hacer un ls en Sarge
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:21:03AM +0200, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: Probaría a pasarle un memtest para ver la ram y/o probar con otro disco duro Vale, lo único, he probado memtest all (que es como interpreto se debe ejecutar el comando) y me ah colgado la máquina, ¿cómo debería ejecutarlo? lo mejor sería que en este caso utilices un memtest que sea independiente del SO (vamos, no el memtest que puedas tener en el sistema que te está dando problemas). Tienes los paquetes memtest86 y memtest86+ para ello, que te permiten arrancar el testeo desde grub o lilo. Si el sistema está tan mal que no te permite siquiera instalar nuevos paquetes, tendrás que agenciarte un live-cd que lo incluya (hay un montón por ahí). Un saludo, E. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation fault al hacer un ls en Sarge
On 8/2/07, Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: El 2/08/07, Adrià [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Yo por mi parte te recomendaría mirar la integridad del disco duro, ya que esto fue lo que le pasó a uno de mis servidores. Por suerte, con un disco nuevo y los backups, en un día lo tuve funcionando :) ¿Por ejemplo un badblocks desde un live-cd? Gracias. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dependiendo de la urgencia (has dicho que el servidor está en producción, no?) yo me plantearía ahora mismo ser resolutivos y después caspar. Depende de las posibilidades que tengas, quizás merecia la pena obtener una nueva máquina (o hacer un frankenstein con piezas antiguas) y sustituir -aunque sea de forma provisional- el servidor afectado. A partir de aquí, restaurar a partir de backups y, si puedes, con esta receta [1]. Por lo que comentabas antes, si ejecutar memtest te ha colgado la máquina, cambio mi apuesta de disco duro a RAM. Saludos! [1] http://mundogeek.net/archivos/2007/06/11/copia-de-seguridad-de-los-programas-instalados-en-linux/ -- Adrià García-Alzórriz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation fault al hacer un ls en Sarge
El 2/08/07, Adrià [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Dependiendo de la urgencia (has dicho que el servidor está en producción, no?) yo me plantearía ahora mismo ser resolutivos y después caspar. Depende de las posibilidades que tengas, quizás merecia la pena obtener una nueva máquina (o hacer un frankenstein con piezas antiguas) y sustituir -aunque sea de forma provisional- el servidor afectado. De hecho esa medida ya ha sido tomada y estamos en ello ;) Por lo que comentabas antes, si ejecutar memtest te ha colgado la máquina, cambio mi apuesta de disco duro a RAM. Bueno, en realidad había colgado MI máquina al hacer un memtest all, o igual es que tarda mucho mucho tiempo en el allocating X el caso es que en la máquina afectada se ha cambiado los zócalos de RAM y el problema persiste, por lo que seuponemos será tema de disco y estamos montando otra máquina. Gracias por todo a todos los que me habéis ayudado. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: segmentation fault in Mozilla browser
For me it didn't crash On 12/20/05, H.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, While reading the Slashdot news on the pirates bay, I noticed that when I click on this link: http://thepiratebay.org/legal.php it starts to load but before finishing Mozilla browser crashed. The message on the std out is segmentation fault. The above link is on this page: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=171669cid=14297749 The webpage also crashes Firefox browser. I am using: ii mozilla-browser 1.7.12-1 ii mozilla-firefox 1.0.7-1 This is on Debian Testing, running 2.6.12-1-686 kernel. Anybody else having this problem? -HS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- L.V.Gandhi http://lvgandhi.tripod.com/ linux user No.205042
Re: segmentation fault in Mozilla browser
H.S. wrote: Hi, While reading the Slashdot news on the pirates bay, I noticed that when I click on this link: http://thepiratebay.org/legal.php it starts to load but before finishing Mozilla browser crashed. The message on the std out is segmentation fault. The above link is on this page: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=171669cid=14297749 The webpage also crashes Firefox browser. I am using: ii mozilla-browser 1.7.12-1 ii mozilla-firefox 1.0.7-1 This is on Debian Testing, running 2.6.12-1-686 kernel. Anybody else having this problem? -HS when i loaded - with the mozilla-plugin - the (newest, self-compiled) kaffeine to look at some news-pages in the browser (standard mozilla under sarge) seemingly without a system mozilla broke sometimes down with a *segmentation fault* these crashes do *not* repeat with the *debian* kaffeine-plugin and the *debian* kaffeine package installed. steef -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation fault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I installed a copy of debian from the netinstall cd about 2 weeks ago. the installation works fine but once I get the base system on and try to do any apt-get commands every packet I try to download gives the error segmentation fault and then goes back to prompt. I've tried many different sources for the packets and every source I try to use ends up with the same error. Aaron Adamson If possible, try different memory modules. For some reason, dpkg seems particularly sensitive to memory errors. I once got repeated segfaults and perl warnings due to memory errors, when almost no other test (including memtest) was able to detect the failures. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation fault
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 05:26:44PM -0400, Marty wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I installed a copy of debian from the netinstall cd about 2 weeks ago. the installation works fine but once I get the base system on and try to do any apt-get commands every packet I try to download gives the error segmentation fault and then goes back to prompt. I've tried many different sources for the packets and every source I try to use ends up with the same error. Aaron Adamson If possible, try different memory modules. For some reason, dpkg seems particularly sensitive to memory errors. I once got repeated segfaults and perl warnings due to memory errors, when almost no other test (including memtest) was able to detect the failures. Although memtest did not work out for you, I have had ut successfully detect faulty memory for me. You may want to boot a Knoppix CD and run memtest from it. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto pgpTPdwDIYeyH.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Segmentation fault
On 4/30/05, Ritesh Raj Sarraf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyway, I recommend you reinstall Sarge from scratch, using the netinst ISO image. Since Sarge isn't released yet, doing an upgrade may not work well. If Sarge isn't released how will installing it from scratch help ? And Debian is known to be upgraded from releases to releases. Sarge has not been finalized yet. Therefore, there is a chance that upgrading from Woody to Sarge may not work completely yet. Since you did upgrade from Woody to Sarge, it might not have gone completely smoothly. Installing clean from the Sarge installer may fix some of the weird, hard-to-track-down problems you are having. If you don't want to try it, that's up to you. :)
Re: Segmentation fault on startup
On Tuesday 23 November 2004 23:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am seeing the segmentation fault message as the startup scripts race by. Cannot retrieve it by dmesg afterwards. It is apparently (hopefully) harmless. Anybody else getting this. I have the most recent 2.6.8-4 kernel image off Sid. Activate the boot log daemon. Take a look at /etc/default/bootlogd. The log will be written to /var/log/boot. BOOTLOGD_ENABLE=yes is there. I am not gettling the boot log. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: segmentation fault in shib target: has anyone experienced this?
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 10:21:59 -0500, Kanipe, Kent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had a bunch of problems like this and it was related to a combination of OS, and compiler version. What setup are you built for? Red Hat ES 3.0., kernel 2.4.21-15.EL gcc version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-34) Apache/2.0.46 (as supplied) OpenSSL 0.9.7a Feb 19 2003 (as supplied) shibboleth-1.2.1 xml-security-c-1.1.0 xerces-c- 2.6.1 opensaml-1.0.1 log4cpp-0.3.4b (all from wayf.internet2.edu/shibboleth/) curl-7.11.1 Thanks, -- Jon Dowland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: segmentation fault in shib target: has anyone experienced this?
oops, apologies for the mis-reply. Got my lists mixed up. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation fault on startup
Hello David Baron ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I am seeing the segmentation fault message as the startup scripts race by. Cannot retrieve it by dmesg afterwards. It is apparently (hopefully) harmless. Anybody else getting this. I have the most recent 2.6.8-4 kernel image off Sid. Activate the boot log daemon. Take a look at /etc/default/bootlogd. The log will be written to /var/log/boot. best regards Andreas Janssen -- Andreas Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC801674 ICQ #17079270 Registered Linux User #267976 http://www.andreas-janssen.de/debian-tipps-sarge.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation fault (solved)
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 01:05:52AM -0400, Marek Pawinski wrote: [root:~]mkdir bak [root:~]mkdir bak/var [root:~]mkdir bak/var/cache [root:~]mkdir bak/var/cache/apt [root:~]mkdir bak/var/cache/apt/bin You should be able to do this in one command: [root:~]mkdir -p bak/var/cache/apt/bin The `-p' makes the bin directory and any Parent directories that do not yet exist. -- Maurits van Rees | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://maurits.vanrees.org/ Let your advance worrying become advance thinking and planning. - Winston Churchill -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation fault
I have had this problem many times, and it was not due to faulty hardware but rather a software issue with me (well it was partially hardware, it would corrupt the database creating the segmentation fault). There was a way of fixing it, i think you had to delete some files alas i cannot remember but a google search should yield more info (thats where i found out) Jule Slootbeek wrote: The last time i saw that error, it was because of a bad memory stick, download memtest86 (i assume you are running on a x86 machine) from www.memtest86.com and see if you have any corrupted memory. hope this helps, -JSS Marek Pawinski wrote: Hi When i run apt-get install package i get a Reading Package Lists... Done Segmentation faulty Tree... 50% error. I have tried apt-get check and apt-get clean, does not solve. Apt-get update seems to work. Any help please. Marek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation fault (solved)
ognen wrote: I have had this problem many times, and it was not due to faulty hardware but rather a software issue with me (well it was partially hardware, it would corrupt the database creating the segmentation fault). There was a way of fixing it, i think you had to delete some files alas i cannot remember but a google search should yield more info (thats where i found out) Jule Slootbeek wrote: The last time i saw that error, it was because of a bad memory stick, download memtest86 (i assume you are running on a x86 machine) from www.memtest86.com and see if you have any corrupted memory. hope this helps, -JSS Marek Pawinski wrote: Hi When i run apt-get install package i get a Reading Package Lists... Done Segmentation faulty Tree... 50% error. I have tried apt-get check and apt-get clean, does not solve. Apt-get update seems to work. Any help please. Marek Thanks guys i found the solution here it is: [root:~]mkdir bak [root:~]mkdir bak/var [root:~]mkdir bak/var/cache [root:~]mkdir bak/var/cache/apt [root:~]mkdir bak/var/cache/apt/bin [root:~]mv /var/cache/apt/*.bin ~/bak/var/cache/apt/bin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation fault - meaning
On Thursday 08 January 2004 00:05, Leandro Guimares Faria Corcete Dutra wrote: I try to run it on the laptop I get a segmentation fault. What does that mean, and what sorts of things might cause it? This is a but, plain and simple. It means that the program tried to access some protected memory segment. Worst case scenario, this could also mean your RAM is bad. If you want to rule out this possibility, google for memtest - a bootable image that stress tests your RAM. Hans -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation fault - meaning
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:30:33 +0200 Hans du Plooy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 08 January 2004 00:05, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete Dutra wrote: I try to run it on the laptop I get a segmentation fault. What does that mean, and what sorts of things might cause it? This is a but, plain and simple. It means that the program tried to access some protected memory segment. Worst case scenario, this could also mean your RAM is bad. If you want to rule out this possibility, google for memtest - a bootable image that stress tests your RAM. Or just apt-get install memtest86 and add it to /etc/lilo.conf -- James Tappin, O__ I forget the punishment for using [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- \/`Microsoft --- Something lingering http://www.tappin.me.uk/with data loss in it I fancy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation fault - meaning
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:55:11PM +, Fred Richards wrote: I've installed a package on a PC, and then the same on a laptop. When I try to run it on the laptop I get a segmentation fault. What does that mean, and what sorts of things might cause it? It's almost impossible to answer that usefully in such general terms. A segmentation fault means that the program accessed an area of memory which it was not supposed to access. It almost always indicates a bug: for instance, a pointer to some memory might have been accidentally overwritten with junk. Beyond that, I'd need to see specifics. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation fault - meaning
Em Qua, 2004-01-07 s 12:55, Fred Richards escreveu: I've installed a package on a PC, and then the same on a laptop. When I try to run it on the laptop I get a segmentation fault. What does that mean, and what sorts of things might cause it? This is a but, plain and simple. It means that the program tried to access some protected memory segment. This is either an upstream bug, or a package version mismatch probably. -- Leandro Guimares Faria Corcete Dutra [EMAIL PROTECTED] Prefeitura do Municpio de So Paulo Governo Eletrnico, Telecentros +55 (11) 5080 9647 http://br.geocities.com./lgcdutra/ +55 (11) 5080 9648 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: segmentation fault
Hallo Florian Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: XF86Conf: ... Section Module Load GLcore Load bitmap EndSection Ich kann nicht genau sagen ob der segmentation fault etwas damit zu tun hat, aber die Module Section sollte anders aussehen. Wenn du die Debian Packete fuer den Treiber verwendet hast, steht folgendes in /usr/share/doc/nvidia-glx/README.Debian (ansonsten in der README auf der NVidia Seite): Minimum requirements: In Section Module add Load glx remove Load dri remove Load GLcore mfg Florian pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: segmentation fault
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 04:03:15AM -0300, caio ferreira wrote: : Qualquer coisa que eu venha fazer que exige algum ***processamento pesado*** : como a compilação de um kernel, aparece a mensagem Segmentation Fault 1) Sobreaquecimento do processador 2) Setores defeituosos no HD, que corromperam alguma biblioteca importante. 3) Memoria defeituosa (as vezes voce precisa deixar varias horas para o memtest encontrar algum erro). -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jxz.dontexist.org/ pgpXQel6Y4529.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: segmentation fault no wget
No dia 17/07/2003 às 15:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: gente, O comando é este: ... Tá foda. Já aconteceu três vezes hoje. Dei apt-get update; apt-get upgrade a mais ou menos uma semana atrás... Sugestões? Já tive problemas de falha de segmentação com o wget. A propósito, você está usando o wget da unstable? -- Douglas Augusto
Re: segmentation fault no wget
No dia 17/07/2003 às 15:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: gente, O comando é este: ... Tá foda. Já aconteceu três vezes hoje. Dei apt-get update; apt-get upgrade a mais ou menos uma semana atrás... Sugestões? Já tive problemas de falha de segmentação com o wget. A propósito, você está usando o wget da unstable? Não. Meu sistema é totalmente woody. E outra coisa. Rodei de novo com a opção -b, como falei que ia fazer e não deu pau nenhum. Fiquei olhando com tail -f -n 20 wget-log. Agora, eu não sei se foi coincidência ou não. Semana que vem, quando eu fizer o processo de novo, vou tentar com -b desde o começo para ver o que acontece.
Re: segmentation fault
Em Wed, 09 Jul 2003 16:37:33 -0300, fred escreveu: Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 04:30:00PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Segfault é uma falha de segmentação que pode ocorrer com qualquer programa. Isso acontece se o programa que você está usando tem um bug, foi o wget, baixando as atulaizações de segurança do potato, do slink, do sarge e do woody... E quanto aos logs? Era para ele deixar um core-sei-lá-o-que em algum lugar? Não, quando há segfault é pau mesmo, nada de log. Eu sugeriria verificar se não há um relato de erro do wget, se possível atualizá-lo... -- _ / \ Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra +41 (21) 648 11 34 \ / http://br.geocities.com./lgcdutra/ +41 (78) 778 11 34 / \ Responda à lista, não a mim diretamente! +55 (11) 5686 2219 Dê-me nota se te ajudei: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=leandro
Re: segmentation fault
Em Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 04:37:33PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 04:30:00PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Povo, Olá Magalhães :), Eu mereço... Por que acontece o segmentation fault? Eu estava tranquilamente baixando um espelho das atualizações de segurança do debian quando aconteceu a primeira vez. Rodei de novo, e uns minutos depois aconteceu de novo. Que howto trata do assunto? Ele deixa rastro em algum log? Olhei no /var/log e não achei nenhum nome muito sugestivo. Segfault é uma falha de segmentação que pode ocorrer com qualquer programa. Isso acontece se o programa que você está usando tem um bug, e/ou foi mal programado. Quando um programa precisa ler parte da memória que não foi devidamente inisializada, ou não pertence ao programa, acontece isso e o kernel geralmente termina o programa. Primeiro temos então que sager qual programa você está usando. foi o wget, baixando as atulaizações de segurança do potato, do slink, do sarge e do woody... E quanto aos logs? Era para ele deixar um core-sei-lá-o-que em algum lugar? Core dump; um arquivinho chamado core deixado no seu $HOME. É útil para desenvolvedores depurarem o programa, acharem o que é que está errado. Quando eu tinha um AMD-K6 e o cooler passou a ter problemas (processador AMD + cooler defeituoso = superaquecimento da CPU), eu tinha vários segmentation faults, mesmo em programas considerado estáveis, como o mutt e procmail, além de reinicializações sem mais nem menos. Troquei o cooler, acabou-se o problema. Só para constar.
Re: segmentation fault
Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 04:30:00PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Povo, Olá Magalhães :), Por que acontece o segmentation fault? Eu estava tranquilamente baixando um espelho das atualizações de segurança do debian quando aconteceu a primeira vez. Rodei de novo, e uns minutos depois aconteceu de novo. Que howto trata do assunto? Ele deixa rastro em algum log? Olhei no /var/log e não achei nenhum nome muito sugestivo. Segfault é uma falha de segmentação que pode ocorrer com qualquer programa. Isso acontece se o programa que você está usando tem um bug, e/ou foi mal programado. Quando um programa precisa ler parte da memória que não foi devidamente inisializada, ou não pertence ao programa, acontece isso e o kernel geralmente termina o programa. Primeiro temos então que sager qual programa você está usando. Até Claudio -- +- .''`. ---| Claudio Clemens in Germany now |--| Sid |---+ | : :' : asturio at gmx.netGNU/Linux User #79942| | `. `'To C or not to C? That's the question! | | `- YE GODS, I HAVE FEET??! - Userfriendly | Scotty! Hurry! Beam me uragg^*·)(@$þ£ NO CARRIER pgp8fOFCu770j.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: segmentation fault
Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 04:30:00PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Povo, Olá Magalhães :), Eu mereço... Por que acontece o segmentation fault? Eu estava tranquilamente baixando um espelho das atualizações de segurança do debian quando aconteceu a primeira vez. Rodei de novo, e uns minutos depois aconteceu de novo. Que howto trata do assunto? Ele deixa rastro em algum log? Olhei no /var/log e não achei nenhum nome muito sugestivo. Segfault é uma falha de segmentação que pode ocorrer com qualquer programa. Isso acontece se o programa que você está usando tem um bug, e/ou foi mal programado. Quando um programa precisa ler parte da memória que não foi devidamente inisializada, ou não pertence ao programa, acontece isso e o kernel geralmente termina o programa. Primeiro temos então que sager qual programa você está usando. foi o wget, baixando as atulaizações de segurança do potato, do slink, do sarge e do woody... E quanto aos logs? Era para ele deixar um core-sei-lá-o-que em algum lugar?
Re: segmentation fault
German Garcia wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:42:40AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: por que puede ser que cuando hago un ps, top me larga una violación de segmento a que se puede deber esto -Que version de Debian tenes instalada ? -Solo te pasa con estos programas o tambien con otros ? -Estas usando un kernel compilado por vos ? -Tenes la pc overclockeada ? -- German Garcia | Debian GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] | vi - c - c++ Buenos Aires, Argentina | Barrio de Tango Otra posibilidad es que te hayan crackeado la máquina y el ps, el top o ambos hayan sido modificados para no mostrar el regalito, pero tenga(n) errores en la programación. Soy algo paranoico :-D -- Linux User #98419 -o)| Pon a volar tu mente... ¡¡Fuma http://counter.li.org /\| dinamita!! ICQ 94335020 _\_v | | |
Re: segmentation fault
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:42:40AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: por que puede ser que cuando hago un ps, top me larga una violación de segmento a que se puede deber esto -Que version de Debian tenes instalada ? -Solo te pasa con estos programas o tambien con otros ? -Estas usando un kernel compilado por vos ? -Tenes la pc overclockeada ? -- German Garcia | Debian GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] | vi - c - c++ Buenos Aires, Argentina | Barrio de Tango
Re: segmentation fault - XEphem
Glenn Becker([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: Hi - I can't pinpoint *exactly* when this problem began. I'm running testing (sarge) with a few unstable packages thrown in. Anyway, I installed the commercial/CD package of the XEphem astronomy program some months ago and have been happily running it since. Last week, however, I started getting a segmentation fault when I tried to run the program. I am running xephem 3.5-2, from testing (I think), and it runs fine. Suggest you use the CD for the Win version and just get the deb package. I seem to recall that a while ago I had used xephem-smotif, so I check the dependices for xephem and see VT1 root-3-Buddy:~# deps xephem xephem Depends: lesstif1 Depends: libc6 Depends: xlibs Conflicts: xephem-smotif Conflicts: xephem-dmotif Replaces: xephem-smotif Replaces: xephem-dmotif That might be the problem(?) HTH -- Windows: the ultimate triumph of marketing over technology. ___ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: segmentation fault - XEphem
Wayne - I am running xephem 3.5-2, from testing (I think), and it runs fine. Suggest you use the CD for the Win version and just get the deb package. This was a good suggestion, though I have the UNIX CD. :) CD version still works fine on my old laptop, which runs Slackware 8.1. What I did was uninstall, install the XEphem .deb, then copy the data files over from the CD. Works great now. Thx, Glenn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: segmentation fault
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 05:19:43PM +0100, Bartosz Dabrowski wrote: Sorry za moja niewiedze, ale ostatnio sobie cos pisalem w cpp i caly czas przy odpalaniu programikow wyskakuje mi segmentation fault podczas gdy w windzie te programy uruchamiaja sie poprawnie. Na czym polega segmentation fault Naruszenie segmentacji oznacza, że proces próbował odwołać się do obszaru pamięci, który nie został mu przydzielony. Pod windows nazywa się to chyba segmentation violation. Jak łatwo się domyśleć nie każde błędne odwołanie powoduje naruszenie segmentacji - zależy to od wielkości i umiejscowienia konkretnych segmentów no i charakteru samego błędu... i co trzeba zrobic zeby przestal wyskakiwac? Poprawić program :-) Masz do dyspozycji: * -Wall * electric-fence (nie wiem czy działa pod c++, ale jeśli nie to pewnie znajdziesz coś podobnego) * gdb Marcin -- Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://marcin.owsiany.pl/ GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216 FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75 D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4 1216
Re: segmentation fault
Hi toto! On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 11:13:07AM +0200, toto wrote: wenn ich bei der ausführung eines programmes ein 'segmentation fault' zurück kriege , was ist dann? ask google ;-) Z.B.: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/segmentation-fault.html Bekommst du das bei einem eigen Programm oder einem fertigen Paket? -- Greetings, Tobias PGP/GnuPG Key ID 0xAE034AAD (preferred) msg10102/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: segmentation fault
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 11:59:56AM +0200, Torsten Puls wrote: Z.B.: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/segmentation-fault.html Bekommst du das bei einem eigen Programm oder einem fertigen Paket? das weiß ich jetzt nicht mehr. ich will nur das grundlegende verstehen. Dieses Signal wird erzeugt, wenn ein Prozess auf einen Speicherbereich zugreift, der ihm nicht gehoert (den er also z.B. nicht mit malloc reserviert hat). was ist bei einem eigenem programm und was bei einem fertigen paket? Bei einem eigenen Programm ist das meist ein Tippfehler, in einem fertigen Programm oft ein Bug, der in Faellen auftritt, die der Entwickler (noch) nicht testen konnte ;-) Kurz gut: Konkreter laesst sich das nicht sagen, da die Ursachen vielfaeltig sind ;-) Btw, auf win32-System lautet das ganze so aehnlich wie allgemeine Schutzverletzung ;-) -- Greetings, Tobias PGP/GnuPG Key ID 0xAE034AAD (preferred) -- Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: Segmentation fault, ese incordio
Probablemente se trata de un problema hardware de algún tipo. Existe un FAQ para la señal 11 (Violación de segmento) en algún lugar de Internet que no recuerdo (y no tengo Internet a mano :-( Busca en Google como Sig11 FAQ o por Segmentation Fault FAQ o algo así... aparece seguro! A mi me pasa desde que instalé un nuevo módulo de memoria... y a lo mejor dañe alguna pista en la placa o algún banco de memoria y ahora me pasa con frecuencia aunque no me impide trabajar de momento. Suerte! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 09:37:06 +0100 Subject: Segmentation fault, ese incordio Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] == Juan Manuel Enrique Muñido == E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Teléfono: 676853151 == Name: TXT0.TXT TXT0.TXTType: Plain Text (text/plain) Encoding: base64
Re: Segmentation fault, ese incordio
Fernando Taboada wrote: Probablemente se trata de un problema hardware de algún tipo. Existe un FAQ para la señal 11 (Violación de segmento) en algún lugar de Internet que no recuerdo (y no tengo Internet a mano :-( Busca en Google como Sig11 FAQ o por Segmentation Fault FAQ o algo así... aparece seguro! Buenas. Yo tengo este enlace, http://www.BitWizard.nl/sig11/, por si sirve de algo. Un saludo. -- Web imprescindible para todo principiante de Linux http://www.escomposlinux.org Por una Tarifa Plana Universal y Asequible (RTB) http://mienten.com
Re: segmentation fault with kmail and attachements: what am I doing wrong?
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 10:38:52AM +0100, rdiaz wrote: Dear All, A few days ago I installed Woody (after a couple of years of suse). Everything seems fine, but I am having a problem with Kmail (4:2.1.1-7). It crashes as soon as I try to include an attachement (segmentation fault, signal 11) in a new message. Same problem here. I think I must be doing something stupid, since I have searched in this list and the bug reports, and I cannot find anything similar. I have tried a whole bunch of possible combinations: installing the full set of kde packages (kdebase, konqueror, etc), installing only the required libraries for kmail (kdelibs3 and kdebase-libs), purging and reinstalling, etc, etc. Package installation (either from dselect or directly using dpkg -i) aparently proceeds without problems, but still I always get the segmentation fault when trying to include the attachement, regardless of size and type of attachement. Can anybody suggest what I might try? Sorry, but I can confirm the buggy behaviour of kmail. kmail -v gives: Qt: 2.3.1 KDE: 2.2.2 KMail: 1.2 I have had testing and unstable in sources.list for apt, so it might be a unusual combination of versions. pgpqmMVtIDt31.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Segmentation Fault w/ XF86Setup
Rafe B. wrote: I just tried to upgrade my potato box with XFree86 from unstable. Bad idea? Not the best. This yields Segmentation Fault when I run XF86Setup. So my questions are: 1. Was it dumb to install XF86 4.1 on top of a 2.2r3 base (kernel 2.2.18pre21) ? Yes, if you mean installing XFree86 4.1 from unstable. No, if you used unofficial XFree86 4.1 packages for potato. Look at: http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2001/debian-x-200109/msg00042.html 2. Is it possible that XF86Setup itself was somehow not updated? 3. Which deb contains XF86Setup? Danged if I can figure it out... xf86setup It is only found in potato. To configure XFree86 4.1, use dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 or XFree86 -configure 4. What's the minimim base for running XF86 version 4.1.0-9? Or is apt-get supposed to deal with such dependencies? Use apt-get or dselect to deal with dependencies. But there will probably so many upgraded packages to solve dependencies, you might as well install sid. 5. Suggestions on where to go from here... If I were you, I would consider either: 1. Reinstall potato packages you upgraded, and then install unofficial XFree86 4.1 packages for potato. or 2. Do a distribution upgrade to woody or sid. (There have been a number of messages in this list discussing the best way to do this.) I hope this helps. -- Jerome
Re: Segmentation Fault w/ XF86Setup
I just tried to upgrade my potato box with XFree86 from unstable. Bad idea? Yes! This yields Segmentation Fault when I run XF86Setup. Mildly chaotic update process, since I was a bit confused about the Deb packages to get. I started with: xfree86-common x-window-system-core xserver-common .. at which point XF86Setup still ran, but showed no video boards to select from. Then I went and got: xserver-svga That is version 3.3.6-39 xserver-xfree86 libgnomesupport0 libgnomeui32 libgnome-perl // and finally: x-window-system version 4.1.x .. which is probably where I should have started. You have a mixture of 3.3.6 and 4.1 packages on your system So my questions are: 1. Was it dumb to install XF86 4.1 on top of a 2.2r3 base (kernel 2.2.18pre21) ? No but the wrong way of doing. Looks like you didn't even have a look on the packeges numbers. 2. Is it possible that XF86Setup itself was somehow not updated? XF86Setup is for 3.3.x 4. What's the minimim base for running XF86 version 4.1.0-9? Or is apt-get supposed to deal with such dependencies? apt-get is your choice. Go to http://people.debian.org/~bunk/ and read the instructions on how to install XF4 on potato with apt-get. 5. Suggestions on where to go from here... Whew! Many thanks in advance. I'm way over my head here, I guess g. rafe b. Frank --
Re: Segmentation fault
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 11:54:17PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini wrote: adding /usr/man to manpath /usr/share/man is already in the manpath /usr/X11R6/man is already in the manpath /usr/local/man is already in the manpath - [segfault] Hmm. The next thing man normally does after that is related to the current locale. Could you tell me what this outputs? echo LC_ALL=$LC_ALL echo LC_MESSAGES=$LC_MESSAGES echo LANG=$LANG echo LANGUAGE=$LANGUAGE I suspect add_nls_manpath() is buggy. Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation fault
Hi Raffaele, If you tell me the version number of the man-db package you have installed, I'll try to debug this. Thanks, I have version 2.3.20-6 of man-db installed. cheers, Raffaele -- Raffaele Sandrini [EMAIL PROTECTED] For encrypted Mail get my Public Key from search.keyserver.net ID: 0xEC4950E9
Re: Segmentation fault
on Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 03:36:17PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, I can't use man anymore. On every manpage i get a segmentation fault. Im using the 2.4.13-ac4 kernel. any hints? $ strace man foo Post the last hundred or so lines of output. *Not* the whole damned thing. Peace. -- Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.com http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What part of Gestalt don't you understand? Home of the brave http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ Land of the free Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html pgpQIDC8zBouk.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Segmentation fault
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 03:36:17PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini wrote: Hi, I can't use man anymore. On every manpage i get a segmentation fault. What version of man-db? Post the end of an strace (as Karsten said) as well as the output of 'man -d somemanpage'. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation fault
On Monday 29 October 2001 20:38, Karsten M. Self wrote: on Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 03:36:17PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, I can't use man anymore. On every manpage i get a segmentation fault. Im using the 2.4.13-ac4 kernel. any hints? $ strace man foo Hi again, here the output of strace man ls - open(/lib/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY)= 3 read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\270\327..., 1024) = 1024 fstat64(0x3, 0xbfffedbc)= 0 old_mmap(NULL, 1187712, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4001a000 mprotect(0x40132000, 40832, PROT_NONE) = 0 old_mmap(0x40132000, 24576, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0x117000) = 0x40132000 old_mmap(0x40138000, 16256, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40138000 close(3)= 0 open(/usr/local/qt3/lib/libdb2.so.2, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/usr/local/lib/libdb2.so.2, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/opt/kde/lib/libdb2.so.2, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(i686/mmx/libdb2.so.2, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(i686/libdb2.so.2, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(mmx/libdb2.so.2, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(libdb2.so.2, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/lib/libdb2.so.2, O_RDONLY) = 3 read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\0_\0\000..., 1024) = 1024 fstat64(0x3, 0xbfffedac)= 0 old_mmap(NULL, 265836, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4013c000 mprotect(0x4017c000, 3692, PROT_NONE) = 0 old_mmap(0x4017c000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0x3f000) = 0x4017c000 close(3)= 0 munmap(0x40016000, 14566) = 0 umask(022) = 022 brk(0) = 0x80635d4 brk(0x80635fc) = 0x80635fc brk(0x8064000) = 0x8064000 fstat64(0, 0xb89c) = 0 fstat64(0x1, 0xb89c)= 0 fstat64(0x2, 0xb89c)= 0 getcwd(/root, 4094) = 6 SYS_199(0x40137058, 0, 0x40137d60, 0x40134e70, 0xb97c) = 6 semop(1075015768, 0x40134e70, 0)= 6 ioctl(0, TCGETS, {B38400 opost isig icanon echo ...}) = 0 ioctl(1, TCGETS, {B38400 opost isig icanon echo ...}) = 0 ioctl(0, TIOCGWINSZ, {ws_row=30, ws_col=80, ws_xpixel=0, ws_ypixel=0}) = 0 open(/root/.manpath, O_RDONLY)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/etc/manpath.config, O_RDONLY) = 3 fstat64(0x3, 0xbfffd49c)= 0 old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40016000 read(3, # manpath.config\n#\n# This file i..., 4096) = 4096 read(3, n the order listed here;\n# the d..., 4096) = 570 read(3, , 4096) = 0 close(3)= 0 munmap(0x40016000, 4096)= 0 ioctl(1, TCGETS, {B38400 opost isig icanon echo ...}) = 0 ioctl(0, TCGETS, {B38400 opost isig icanon echo ...}) = 0 rt_sigaction(SIGINT, {0x804e330, [INT], SA_RESTART|0x400}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0 stat64(0x8063a08, 0xb724) = 0 stat64(0x8063a50, 0xb724) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64(0x80639b8, 0xb724) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64(0x8063928, 0xb724) = 0 stat64(0x8063ae8, 0xb724) = 0 stat64(0x8063ef0, 0xb714) = 0 stat64(0x8063ef0, 0xb724) = 0 stat64(0x8063ef0, 0xb714) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64(0x8063f30, 0xb714) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64(0x8063ef0, 0xb714) = 0 stat64(0x8063ef0, 0xb724) = 0 stat64(0x8063ef0, 0xb714) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64(0x8063ef0, 0xb714) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64(0x80639b8, 0xb724) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64(0x80637a0, 0xb724) = 0 brk(0x8065000) = 0x8065000 brk(0x8066000) = 0x8066000 --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) --- +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++ and here the output of man -d ls -- ruid=6, euid=6 ++priv_drop_count = 1 From the config file /etc/manpath.config: Mandatory mandir `/usr/man'. Mandatory mandir `/usr/share/man'. Mandatory mandir `/usr/X11R6/man'. Mandatory mandir `/usr/local/man'. Path `/bin' mapped to mandir `/usr/share/man'. Path `/usr/bin' mapped to mandir `/usr/share/man'. Path `/sbin' mapped to mandir `/usr/share/man'. Path `/usr/sbin' mapped to mandir `/usr/share/man'. Path `/usr/local/bin' mapped to mandir `/usr/local/man'. Path
Re: Segmentation fault
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 11:54:17PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini wrote: On Monday 29 October 2001 20:38, Karsten M. Self wrote: $ strace man foo Hi again, here the output of strace man ls [...] and here the output of man -d ls Hi Raffaele, If you tell me the version number of the man-db package you have installed, I'll try to debug this. Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: segmentation fault??
Hi, This is my first time to meet this message and don't know why. The story is. This afternoon, I tried to install ssh3 for higher security. Follow standard step: configure make make install everything was fine, no error message showed on the screen. But, I can not connect to my server by ssh client server from poor win98. (This is another problem _) For this problem (someone corrects me if I'm saying stupid things), you have to configure ssh with --with-apm option thus: ./configure --with-apm So, I read FAQ. In FAQ said that I must check my ssh version, use command ssh -V . I did it, and then showed segmentation fault on my screen.. Why??? Er... for this one... sorry :-( no idea Fred. It is just simple command. Hope someone can tell me why. Please!! *_* And thanks for who read this mail.^^ haheho
Re: Segmentation fault
Bonjour J'ai installé un debian noyau linux 2.4.9 comme passerelle internet avec iptables. La connexion est assurée par une carte isdn. Le tout tourne avec un pentium 166 MHZ et 24Mo de memoire Quand je tape : isdnctrl status ippp0 j'ai : ippp0 connected to 0860888080 Segmentation fault C'est sûrement pas bon. Que dois-je envisager pour de plus avoir cette erreur. Merci Segmentation fault est malheureusement un message tres generique generalement un core est genere et pour savoir precisement d'ou vient le probleme il faut analyser le core avec sdb, mais malheureusement ceci n'est pas si simple.
Re: Segmentation fault
Tu peux aussi lancer la commande isdnctrl avec strace, voir man strace et envoyer le résultat au mainteneur. Stef... Quand je tape : isdnctrl status ippp0 j'ai : ippp0 connected to 0860888080 Segmentation fault C'est sûrement pas bon. Que dois-je envisager pour de plus avoir cette erreur. Merci Segmentation fault est malheureusement un message tres generique generalement un core est genere et pour savoir precisement d'ou vient le probleme il faut analyser le core avec sdb, mais malheureusement ceci n'est pas si simple. .. . Linux - Debian - php4 - Apache - MySQL - Infogerance . . email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.actionweb.fr . . Tel: (0)141 906 100-Fax: (0)141 906 101. ..
Re: Segmentation Fault All possible solutions Please.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear members, Here is something I have not been really been able to understand .. SEGME NTATION FAULT . Please tell m: 1)What exactly is segmentation fault ? 2)When does it occur ? 3)How Do you Solve it ? It means that a program has tried to address memory that does not belong to it. It is likely to occur if the program uses an uninitialised pointer. There can be many causes, all of which come down to programmer error. You solve it first by using the debugger to find the pointer which is at fault and second by carefully writing your programs so that they never try to access invalid pointers. -- Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED] Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver PGP: 1024R/32B8FAA1: 97 EA 1D 47 72 3F 28 47 6B 7E 39 CC 56 E4 C1 47 GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. Romans 10:13