Re: apt-get problem installing qemu-kvm
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:52:09AM -0600, Roberto Cantalapiedra wrote: Hi All, I'm having problem installing qemu-kvm from apt-get. When I run the command: apt-get install qemu-kvm using root user I got this error message: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Package qemu-kvm is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source E: Package 'qemu-kvm' has no installation candidate I tried: apt-get update or apt-get clean without any luck. This is my source.list file: deb [1]http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib deb-src [2]http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib deb [3]http://ftp.debian.org/debian wheezy-updates main contrib deb [4]http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main contrib deb-src [5]http://ftp.debian.org/debian wheezy-updates main contrib Any clue about this problem? http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=qemu-kvm shows that qemu-kvm SHOULD be available in wheezy main on the amd64 and i386 architectures (if you're running something else, then no, you won't be able to get it). Try apt-cache policy qemu-kvm, to see if that sheds any light. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: apt-get problem installing qemu-kvm
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:52:09AM -0600, Roberto Cantalapiedra wrote: Hi All, I'm having problem installing qemu-kvm from apt-get. When I run the command: apt-get install qemu-kvm using root user I got this error message: ...snip.. Strange. I'm running wheezy. I assume you are to from your sources. My sources list is substantially like yours. Qemu-kvm shows up in my synaptic. Try another mirror. -- Bob Holtzman Your mail is being read by tight lipped NSA agents who fail to see humor in Doctor Strangelove Key ID 8D549279 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: apt-get problem installing qemu-kvm
Roberto Cantalapiedra wrote:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Package qemu-kvm is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
This is usually do to not having run apt-get update and having an out
of date package list. But...
I tried: apt-get update or apt-get clean without any luck.
I see that you tried update already.
This is my source.list file:
deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian wheezy-updates main contrib
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main contrib
deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian wheezy-updates main contrib
Any clue about this problem?
Do you have any other files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/* that would be
causing trouble?
Check to see if you are using a proxy. It is possible that your apt
proxy is causing trouble.
find /etc/apt/apt.conf* -type f -exec grep -i proxy {} +
In any case try apt-cache policy qemu-kvm to see what it shows. Here
is what I see on my Wheezy 7 system.
root@joseki:~# apt-cache policy qemu-kvm
qemu-kvm:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1.1.2+dfsg-6
Version table:
1.1.2+dfsg-6 0
500 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy/main i386 Packages
It should be available. Check everything over again. Make double and
tripple sure that you have no errors running apt-get update.
Now some other unrelated comments...
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main contrib
This should be okay. The http.us.debian.org is the same as
ftp.us.debian.org and there should not be any difference. But if all
else fails then I would
Lastly and unrelated I see that you have the contrib section but not
the non-free section. That is a valid combination but unusual. This
won't be related to your problem since qemu-kvm is in main. But
usually contrib and non-free go together since both are for non-free
things. Usually contrib is for free things that load non-free things.
It is a two-step process for most things in contrib. Like the Adobe
Flash installer and so forth. Usually you would either have simply
main or you would have all three main contrib non-free. Also you
are missing the deb-src entry for the main archive.
You have the deb-src entries for the volatile wheezy-updates and
security wheezy/updates but are missing the one from main. No big
deal if you never download source but I thought it less than tidy.
Bob
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: apt-get problem
Angelin Lalev schreef: This is a partial output of apt-get update command, performed on my brand new Debian 5.0 installation: [snip] Is that an indication that the mirror is not ok, or I am doing something wrong. You are using the ftp.egr.msu.edu mirror in your /etc/apt/sources.list. It seems the mirror has gone offline and you may want to switch to another one. To do that, open your /etc/apt/sources.list in an editor as root, and replace all instances of ftp.egr.msu.edu with another mirror, such as ftp.debian.org. Sjors -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: apt-get problem
Use apt-get spy but read this about apt-get for the future... http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html#pkgmgmt Sjors Gielen wrote: Angelin Lalev schreef: This is a partial output of apt-get update command, performed on my brand new Debian 5.0 installation: [snip] Is that an indication that the mirror is not ok, or I am doing something wrong. You are using the ftp.egr.msu.edu mirror in your /etc/apt/sources.list. It seems the mirror has gone offline and you may want to switch to another one. To do that, open your /etc/apt/sources.list in an editor as root, and replace all instances of ftp.egr.msu.edu with another mirror, such as ftp.debian.org. Sjors -- -- You don't know where your shadow will fall, Somebody.- -- Ing. Olaf Reitmaier Veracierta ola...@gmail.com -- http://olafrv.googlepages.com (Personal Webpage) http://olafrv.blogspot.com (Technical Blog) -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: apt-get - problem configuring /etc/apt/sources.list
Vwaju wrote: With a little help from my friends, I'm teaching myself networking by building an internet server. I am running Debian Linux 3.1 I would upgrade to Debian 4 (Etch) via Internet by doing these steps: 1.) apt-get clean 2.) replace your /etc/apt/sources.list with this: deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian etch main contrib non-free deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian etch main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib non-free deb-src http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib non-free 3.) apt-get update 4.) apt-get upgrade 5.) reboot (required because kernel gets replaced) 6.) apt-get dist-upgrade 7.) reboot (optional) Now your system is up-to-date. TIP: You should have a second terminal open and save a copy of your important config files (the upgrader will tell you which user-modified cfg files should be upgraded). But before doing the above steps consult the official release notes, for example here: http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html (If you want, you can even continue upgrading to Debian 5 (lenny) by replacing etch with lenny above and repeating the steps... But Debian 5 is not yet released, it is in testing state.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get – problem configuring /etc/ apt/sources.list
Vwaju wrote: [snip] Get:1 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org oldstable/main monit 1:4.5-1 [228kB] Err ftp://ftp.us.debian.org oldstable/main monit 1:4.5-1 Unable to fetch file, server said 'Failed to open file. ' [IP: 35.9.37.225 21] Failed to fetch ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/m/monit/monit_4.5-1_i386.deb Unable to fetch file, server said 'Failed to open file. ' [IP: 35.9.37.225 21] E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with --fix-missing? Firstly, try use another mirror in your /etc/apt/sources.list, for example ftp.cz.debian.org or ftp.de.debian.org. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com Ukrainian C++ Developer, Debian APT contributor signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: apt-get -- problem configuring /etc/apt /sources.list
Bob Cox wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 16:26:08 +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Firstly, try use another mirror in your /etc/apt/sources.list, for example ftp.cz.debian.org or ftp.de.debian.org. No. There is no sarge repository on these servers either. The OP will have to use http://archive.debian.org/debian-archive. ftp://ftp.cz.debian.org/debian/README confirms this. Yes, you are right. I've missed the fact that he are using sarge. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com Ukrainian C++ Developer, Debian APT contributor signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: apt-get – problem configuring /etc/apt/sources .list
Thank you Bob and Eugene. Bob -- Yes, inserting: deb http://archive.debian.org/debian sarge main into /etc/apt/sources.list and then running #apt-get update does the trick. Might there be a guide to using apt that is conceptually clearer than the man page? Best Regards, Vwaju -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apt-get problem
[ Please don't top post. ] On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 12:23:58 +0100, Josep M. wrote: Hello Eugene. Thanks, I will change in next msgs, about apt-get upgrade nothing is upgraded: The problem is that apt-get want remove a lot of packages without needed, and I would like change this. deb:# apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded. I have two packages for upgrade and would like what are, dpkg returns nothing:: 140:/home/system/debian/install# dpkg --get-selections | grep hold 140:/home/system/debian/install# Run aptitude search '~U' or start aptitude in interactive mode and look at the section Upgradable Packages. -- Regards,| http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer Florian | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apt-get problem
Josep M. wrote: Hello. With aptitude dist-upgrade all is ok but apt-get dist-upgrade want delete a lot of packages...how can I fix it? [snip] Firstly, please not post locale-specific output of commands, use LANG=C command instead. Secondly, yes, aptitude now has better dependency-resolution algorithm. You can also try 'apt-get upgrade', however. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Apt-get problem
Hello Eugene. Thanks, I will change in next msgs, about apt-get upgrade nothing is upgraded: The problem is that apt-get want remove a lot of packages without needed, and I would like change this. deb:# apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded. I have two packages for upgrade and would like what are, dpkg returns nothing:: 140:/home/system/debian/install# dpkg --get-selections | grep hold 140:/home/system/debian/install# Greetings Josep Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: Josep M. wrote: Hello. With aptitude dist-upgrade all is ok but apt-get dist-upgrade want delete a lot of packages...how can I fix it? [snip] Firstly, please not post locale-specific output of commands, use LANG=C command instead. Secondly, yes, aptitude now has better dependency-resolution algorithm. You can also try 'apt-get upgrade', however. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get Problem
Stopping apache 2.0 web server...Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/php4.load: API module structure `php4_module' in file Da ist ein Fehler in der php4.load. Das php4 Modul temporaer disablen (a2dismod) hilft das Upgrade durchzufuehren. okay, habe ich gemacht. Nun läuft das apt-get upgrade wieder ordentlich durch, wenn es dabei auch ein paar failed-Meldungen rauswirft: Entferne apache2-common ... Stopping apache 2.0 web server...grep: /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/*.conf: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden ... no pidfile found! not running?. (Lese Datenbank ... 201286 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.) Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von apache2-mpm-prefork 2.0.55-4.1 (durch .../apache2- mpm-prefork_2.2.3-2_i386.deb) ... Stopping apache 2.0 web server...grep: /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/*.con f: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/actions.load: Cannot load /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_actions.so into server: /usr/li b/apache2/modules/mod_actions.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory failed! invoke-rc.d: initscript apache2, action stop failed. Stopping apache 2.0 web server...grep: /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/*.conf: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/actions.load: Cannot load /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_actions.so into server: /usr/li b/apache2/modules/mod_actions.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory failed! invoke-rc.d: initscript apache2, action stop failed. Entpacke Ersatz für apache2-mpm-prefork ... Wähle vormals abgewähltes Paket apache2.2-common. Entpacke apache2.2-common (aus .../apache2.2-common_2.2.3-2_i386.deb) ... Stopping apache 2.0 web server...grep: /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/*.con f: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden apache2: Syntax error on line 116 of /etc/apache2/apache2.conf: Syntaxerror on line 1 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/actions.load: Canno t load /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_actions.so into server: /usr/li b/apache2/modules/mod_actions.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory failed! invoke-rc.d: initscript apache2, action stop failed. Danach lief dann alles sauber durch. Das Wer testing/unstable nutzt, sollte sowas selbst hinkriegen verkneife ich mir mal ;) Tja, wie soll man lernen soetwas hinzukriegen ohne es zu versuchen? Ich habe gewiß noch einige Wissenlücken zu füllen in Sachen Aufbau von Debian. ZB ist mir nicht ganz klar, was ich mit den beiden Meldungen machen soll, die beim Update noch aufgetaucht sind: ** * Please purge the hotplug package! * (/etc/init.d/hotplug has been found on this system) ** und * Linux = 2.6.13-rc1 and udev is enabled; use pcmciautils instead Hat da noch jemand Tipps? Oder wo ich mich dazu schlau lesen kann? Danke. -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem
On 31.10.06 22:20:48, Tom Schmitt wrote: Stopping apache 2.0 web server...Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/php4.load: API module structure `php4_module' in file Da ist ein Fehler in der php4.load. Das php4 Modul temporaer disablen (a2dismod) hilft das Upgrade durchzufuehren. okay, habe ich gemacht. Nun läuft das apt-get upgrade wieder ordentlich durch, wenn es dabei auch ein paar failed-Meldungen rauswirft: IIRC kann man dem GMX-Webmail Frontend sagen er soll bei 72 Zeichen den Text umbrechen. Tu das doch bitte. Entferne apache2-common ... Stopping apache 2.0 web server...grep: /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/*.conf: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden ... no pidfile found! not running?. Hast du alle Module deaktiviert? Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/actions.load: Cannot load /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_actions.so into server: /usr/li b/apache2/modules/mod_actions.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Hmm, wohl doch nicht, oder du hast das actions Modul nicht korrekt deaktiviert. Das Modul (.so) ist im Paket apache2.2-common, das sollte im folgenden wohl wieder installiert werden... Das Wer testing/unstable nutzt, sollte sowas selbst hinkriegen verkneife ich mir mal ;) Tja, wie soll man lernen soetwas hinzukriegen ohne es zu versuchen? Man muss ja nicht unbedingt gleich ins Arktische Eiswasser springen, nur um sich abzuhaerten ;) Man koennte z.B. mit einem Stable-Server anfangen, um die Funktionsweise von Debian zu verstehen... Ich habe gewiß noch einige Wissenlücken zu füllen in Sachen Aufbau von Debian. ZB ist mir nicht ganz klar, was ich mit den beiden Meldungen machen soll, die beim Update noch aufgetaucht sind: ** * Please purge the hotplug package! * (/etc/init.d/hotplug has been found on this system) ** Weil du das hotplug Paket purgen sollst, udev hat dieses ersetzt und alte Konfigurationen sollten entfernt werden. und * Linux = 2.6.13-rc1 and udev is enabled; use pcmciautils instead Hat da noch jemand Tipps? Oder wo ich mich dazu schlau lesen kann? Ich vermute du hast ein pcmcia-Paket, das ebenfalls ersetzt wurde durch pcmciautils... Andreas -- Learn to pause -- or nothing worthwhile can catch up to you. -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem
Am Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 22:20 schrieb Tom Schmitt: Ich habe gewiß noch einige Wissenlücken zu füllen in Sachen Aufbau von Debian. ZB ist mir nicht ganz klar, was ich mit den beiden Meldungen machen soll, die beim Update noch aufgetaucht sind: ** * Please purge the hotplug package! * (/etc/init.d/hotplug has been found on this system) ** Einfach machen, was die Meldung sagt. Ich nehme an, Udev wurde installiert, jetzt mußt du den Rest von hotplug entfernen. cu Werner -- Bei genauem Hinsehen zeigt sich, daß Arbeit weniger geisttötend ist als Amusement. -- Charles Baudelaire
Re: apt-get Problem
On 28.10.06 10:30:26, Tom Schmitt wrote: ich benutze Etch und wollte das System mal wieder mit apt-get auf den aktuellen Stand bringen. Leider habe ich damit nun ein Problem. Folgendes erhalte ich beim Versuch das Problem mit -f install zu lösen: Hier sind Zeilen mit einer Laenge von 72 Zeichen erwuenscht. Stopping apache 2.0 web server...Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/php4.load: API module structure `php4_module' in file /usr/lib/apache2/modules/libphp4.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO? failed! Da ist ein Fehler in der php4.load. Das php4 Modul temporaer disablen (a2dismod) hilft das Upgrade durchzufuehren. Eventuell solltest du aber auch warten bis libapache2-mod-php4 in testing eintrudelt, moeglich das die 4.4.2 nicht mit apache2.2 funktioniert. Das Wer testing/unstable nutzt, sollte sowas selbst hinkriegen verkneife ich mir mal ;) Andreas -- You will be honored for contributing your time and skill to a worthy cause. -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: Apt-get problem
mattias jonsson skrev: Har råkat ut för ett något irriterande problem Otillfredsställda beroenden. Försök med apt-get -f install Har du provat apt-get -f install? Danne -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
Gruesse! * Markus Braun [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [29.08.06 21:46]: Hallo, das habe ich soweit gemacht uind dann lief es auch ganz gut bis dass dann kam: dpkg: Ernste Warnung: Dateilisten-Datei des Paketes »slapd« fehlt, nehme an, dass das Paket derzeit keine Dateien installiert hat. 36339 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.) Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von slapd 2.2.23-8 (durch .../slapd_2.2.23-8_i386.deb) ... start-stop-daemon: stat /usr/sbin/slapd: No such file or directory dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von /var/cache/apt/archives/slapd_2.2.23-8_i386.deb (--unpack): Du hast ja noch einen anderen Thread aufgemacht mit ähnlichen Problemen. Ich würde slapd (und auch die anderen Pakete des anderen Threads, die zwar runtergeladen aber nicht ausgepackt/konfiguriert werden können) komplett weghauen mit: apt-get --purge remove paket evtl. erstmal mit der Option -s (simulate) antesten siehe man apt-get und auch das runtergeladene Paket in /var/cache/apt/archives löschen. Dann nochmal versuchen. Du mußt also (wieder) einen Zustand erreichen, in dem alle gewünschten Pakete downgeloadet, entpackt und konfiguriert sind. Mit: dpkg -l kannst du das kontrollieren, es sollte für jedes Paket in der ersten Spalte ii auftauchen. Unkonfigurierte Pakete (wie jetzt bei dir) haben da AFAIK ic oder ci, ich kann grad nicht nachschauen. Erst dann kannst du wieder sauber neue Pakete installieren. Außerdem als Hinweis für die Zukunft: ab Sarge ist aptitude das vorgeschlagene Installations-Werkzeug. Es macht die Paketverwaltung noch einfacher und konsistenter (obwohl es bei deinem Problem keinen Unterschied momentan machern würde). Ach ja: und wenn du in deinem Mail/Web-Frontend normalerweise schon drauf achtest nur an die Liste und nicht an den Absender zu antworten, wäre es ganz nett das auch bei mir zu tun ;-) marcus Gruß Gerhard -- It's nice to be important... but it's more important to be nice. -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get problem
Gruesse! * Markus Braun [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [29.08.06 09:02]: Hallo, habe versucht folgende pakete zu installieren. apt-get install slapd ldap-utils phpldapadmin xml-core php4-ldap und das kommt dann leider traurig debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another process (Lese Datenbank ... dpkg: Ernste Warnung: Dateilisten-Datei des Paketes »slapd« fehlt, nehme an, dass das Paket derzeit keine Dateien installiert hat. Schau doch mal (als root) mit ps ax ob noch ein debconf Prozess oder ein anderer Prozeß, der etwas mit apt/dpkg/... zu tun hat, läuft. Wenn ja kille diese Prozesse. Auch kann es sein, daß durch dein vorhergehendes Killen einfach ein Lockfile übriggeblieben ist. Diese Lockfiles verhindern normalerweise, das z.B. zwei debconfs gleichzeitig laufen bzw. auf die Datenbank zugreifen. Dieses Lockfile (ich kann dir nicht den genauen Ort und Namen sagen) kannst du per Hand löschen. Es sollte sich unter /var finden und z.B. eine Endung wie .lck oder .lock haben. Ich würde bei der Suche in /var/cache beginnen. Wenn du dir unsicher bist schreibe einfach den Namen der datei hier an die Liste. Danach dann nochmal die Installation versuchen. marcus Gruß Gerhard -- MSCI = M$cro Soft Certificated Installer -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get problem
Schau doch mal (als root) mit ps ax ob noch ein debconf Prozess oder ein anderer Prozeß, der etwas mit apt/dpkg/... zu tun hat, läuft. Wenn ja kille diese Prozesse. Auch kann es sein, daß durch dein vorhergehendes Killen einfach ein Lockfile übriggeblieben ist. Diese Lockfiles verhindern normalerweise, das z.B. zwei debconfs gleichzeitig laufen bzw. auf die Datenbank zugreifen. Dieses Lockfile (ich kann dir nicht den genauen Ort und Namen sagen) kannst du per Hand löschen. Es sollte sich unter /var finden und z.B. eine Endung wie .lck oder .lock haben. Ich würde bei der Suche in /var/cache beginnen. Hallo, das habe ich soweit gemacht uind dann lief es auch ganz gut bis dass dann kam: apt-get install slapd ldap-utils phpldapadmin xml-core php4-ldap Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut... Fertig ldap-utils ist schon die neueste Version. phpldapadmin ist schon die neueste Version. xml-core ist schon die neueste Version. php4-ldap ist schon die neueste Version. Empfohlene Pakete: db4.2-util libsasl2-modules Die folgenden Pakete werden aktualisiert: slapd 1 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht aktualisiert. 11 nicht vollständig installiert oder entfernt. Es müssen noch 0B von 3585kB Archiven geholt werden. Nach dem Auspacken werden 2281kB Plattenplatz zusätzlich benutzt. Vorkonfigurieren der Pakete ... (Lese Datenbank ... dpkg: Ernste Warnung: Dateilisten-Datei des Paketes »slapd« fehlt, nehme an, dass das Paket derzeit keine Dateien installiert hat. 36339 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.) Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von slapd 2.2.23-8 (durch .../slapd_2.2.23-8_i386.deb) ... start-stop-daemon: stat /usr/sbin/slapd: No such file or directory dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von /var/cache/apt/archives/slapd_2.2.23-8_i386.deb (--unpack): Unterprozess pre-installation script gab den Fehlerwert 2 zurück Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von phpmyadmin 4:2.6.2-3sarge1 (durch .../phpmyadmin_4%3a2.6.2-3sarge1_all.deb) ... Entpacke Ersatz für phpmyadmin ... Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von: /var/cache/apt/archives/slapd_2.2.23-8_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Also irgendwie ist ein Teil installiert udn der andere teil geht ned :( marcus _ Die neue MSN Suche Toolbar mit Windows-Desktopsuche. Suchen Sie gleichzeitig im Web, Ihren E-Mails und auf Ihrem PC! Jetzt neu! http://desktop.msn.de/ Jetzt gratis downloaden! -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: APT-GET problem: does not have a corresponding .info file
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:29:49PM +0300, Cem Kamil Kulekci wrote: Hi, I just installed mod_evasive apache module and it is working fine. But after that I cannot install or remove anything with apt-get. ex. when i try to install libapache-mod-perl, got error below; Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done libapache-mod-perl is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 19 not upgraded. ** 1 not fully installed or removed. ** this is your problem. until you clear out that 1 package you will not be able to install anything. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up libapache-mod-perl (1.29.0.3-6sarge1) ... Error: mod_evasive.so does not have a corresponding .info file. The above errors might cause apache to not work properly or start Please refer to the documentation on how to fix it or report it to Debian Apache Mailing List debian-apache@lists.debian.org if in doubt on how to proceed dpkg: error processing libapache-mod-perl (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 20 Errors were encountered while processing: libapache-mod-perl E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I'm curious why it refers you to debian-apache unless there is some apache specific stuff going on here in the install. I would guess this is definitely a packaging bug. Can you unpack the .deb and locate the .info file anywhere? maybe the install scripts are looking in the wrong place. A signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: APT-GET problem: does not have a corresponding .info file
Hi, 2006/5/20, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:29:49PM +0300, Cem Kamil Kulekci wrote: ** 1 not fully installed or removed. ** this is your problem. until you clear out that 1 package you will not be able to install anything. It refers to libapache-mod-perl. I've tried more than one but nothing happened. Shows earlier tries. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up libapache-mod-perl (1.29.0.3-6sarge1) ... Error: mod_evasive.so does not have a corresponding .info file. The above errors might cause apache to not work properly or start Please refer to the documentation on how to fix it or report it to Debian Apache Mailing List debian-apache@lists.debian.org if in doubt on how to proceed dpkg: error processing libapache-mod-perl (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 20 Errors were encountered while processing: libapache-mod-perl E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I'm curious why it refers you to debian-apache unless there is some apache specific stuff going on here in the install. I would guess this is definitely a packaging bug. Can you unpack the .deb and locate the .info file anywhere? maybe the install scripts are looking in the wrong place. I've installed it from source code, there is no deb packages for mod_evasive. http://www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/mod_evasive/mod_evasive_1.10.1.tar.gz and installation howto: http://www.hostgeekz.com/guides/Security/59/Install_mod_evasive.htm Cem
Re: APT-GET problem: does not have a corresponding .info file
Problem solved. I've just written the info file manually and it worked. Cem Here is the info I wrote: --- Loadmodule: evasive_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_evasive.so Directives: DOSHashTableSize DOSPageCount DOSSiteCount DOSPageInterval DOSSiteInterval DOSBlockingPeriod Description: Apache module to stop DOS attacks --- 2006/5/20, Cem Kamil Kulekci [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, 2006/5/20, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:29:49PM +0300, Cem Kamil Kulekci wrote: ** 1 not fully installed or removed. ** this is your problem. until you clear out that 1 package you will not be able to install anything. It refers to libapache-mod-perl. I've tried more than one but nothing happened. Shows earlier tries. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up libapache-mod-perl (1.29.0.3-6sarge1) ... Error: mod_evasive.so does not have a corresponding .info file. The above errors might cause apache to not work properly or start Please refer to the documentation on how to fix it or report it to Debian Apache Mailing List debian-apache@lists.debian.org if in doubt on how to proceed dpkg: error processing libapache-mod-perl (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 20 Errors were encountered while processing: libapache-mod-perl E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I'm curious why it refers you to debian-apache unless there is some apache specific stuff going on here in the install. I would guess this is definitely a packaging bug. Can you unpack the .deb and locate the .info file anywhere? maybe the install scripts are looking in the wrong place. I've installed it from source code, there is no deb packages for mod_evasive. http://www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/mod_evasive/mod_evasive_1.10.1.tar.gz and installation howto: http://www.hostgeekz.com/guides/Security/59/Install_mod_evasive.htm Cem
Re: apt-get problem
Aqui nem isso resolve! :( ta ruim! Harlei - Original Message - From: Marcos Vinicius Lazarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Harlei [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: grupo do debian debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 10:20 PM Subject: Re: apt-get problem Harlei wrote: Aí gente, porque meu apt-get ta dando problemas? Eu tento dar apt-get update e ele não consegue atualizar tudo e para em alguma porcentagem tipow 73% [Aguardando por cabeçalhos] e não sai dai... já dei apt-setup e mudei a base de pesquisa umas 5 vezes e sempre para assim, alguns numa porcentagem maior e outros em menor, mas sempre para... oque pode estar acontecendo? Preciso instalar uns pacotes mas assim fica dificil... Cara, já tive problemas assim muito misterioso mesmo. Lembro que troquei de mirror, e só resolveu quado passei de http p/ ftp (ou foi ao contrário? nao me lembro). -- Marcos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
Pelo relato do pessoal da lista e a observação do que ocorre nas minhas máquinas isto deve ser causado pelo repositório ftp.br.debian.org que não estava respondendo mas aparentemente parece ter voltado a vida. Tente agora Boa sorte Sucesso Flávio Alberto Lopes Soares Harlei escreveu: Aqui nem isso resolve! :( ta ruim! Harlei - Original Message - From: Marcos Vinicius Lazarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Harlei [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: grupo do debian debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 10:20 PM Subject: Re: apt-get problem Harlei wrote: Aí gente, porque meu apt-get ta dando problemas? Eu tento dar apt-get update e ele não consegue atualizar tudo e para em alguma porcentagem tipow 73% [Aguardando por cabeçalhos] e não sai dai... já dei apt-setup e mudei a base de pesquisa umas 5 vezes e sempre para assim, alguns numa porcentagem maior e outros em menor, mas sempre para... oque pode estar acontecendo? Preciso instalar uns pacotes mas assim fica dificil... Cara, já tive problemas assim muito misterioso mesmo. Lembro que troquei de mirror, e só resolveu quado passei de http p/ ftp (ou foi ao contrário? nao me lembro). -- Marcos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
Harlei wrote: Aí gente, porque meu apt-get ta dando problemas? Eu tento dar apt-get update e ele não consegue atualizar tudo e para em alguma porcentagem tipow 73% [Aguardando por cabeçalhos] e não sai dai... já dei apt-setup e mudei a base de pesquisa umas 5 vezes e sempre para assim, alguns numa porcentagem maior e outros em menor, mas sempre para... oque pode estar acontecendo? Preciso instalar uns pacotes mas assim fica dificil... Cara, já tive problemas assim muito misterioso mesmo. Lembro que troquei de mirror, e só resolveu quado passei de http p/ ftp (ou foi ao contrário? nao me lembro). -- Marcos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
Particularmente eu prefiro mirrors http. Acho que tinha estes problemas quando utilizava ftp. Ei, não tem um mirror aí na unicamp? Fabiano. Em 18/01/06, Marcos Vinicius Lazarini[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Harlei wrote: Aí gente, porque meu apt-get ta dando problemas? Eu tento dar apt-get update e ele não consegue atualizar tudo e para em alguma porcentagem tipow 73% [Aguardando por cabeçalhos] e não sai dai... já dei apt-setup e mudei a base de pesquisa umas 5 vezes e sempre para assim, alguns numa porcentagem maior e outros em menor, mas sempre para... oque pode estar acontecendo? Preciso instalar uns pacotes mas assim fica dificil... Cara, já tive problemas assim muito misterioso mesmo. Lembro que troquei de mirror, e só resolveu quado passei de http p/ ftp (ou foi ao contrário? nao me lembro). -- Marcos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Abraços, Fabiano
Re: apt-get problem
Tem sim, é o que eu uso: http://www.las.ic.unicamp.br/pub/debian.d/ Entre lá e veja os disponiveis... Se nao me engano, no sources.list vai assim: http://www.las.ic.unicamp.br/pub/debian.d/debian/ Tem mirror do marillat inclusive, beeem mais rápido :-) As vezes eles estão mexendo no Lab (cabeamento, etc) e site fica down - uso mais pela proximidade, é bem rapido por aqui, tem banda sobrando lá: http://www.las.ic.unicamp.br/ -- Marcos Fabiano Pires wrote: Particularmente eu prefiro mirrors http. Acho que tinha estes problemas quando utilizava ftp. Ei, não tem um mirror aí na unicamp? Fabiano. Em 18/01/06, Marcos Vinicius Lazarini[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Harlei wrote: Aí gente, porque meu apt-get ta dando problemas? Eu tento dar apt-get update e ele não consegue atualizar tudo e para em alguma porcentagem tipow 73% [Aguardando por cabeçalhos] e não sai dai... já dei apt-setup e mudei a base de pesquisa umas 5 vezes e sempre para assim, alguns numa porcentagem maior e outros em menor, mas sempre para... oque pode estar acontecendo? Preciso instalar uns pacotes mas assim fica dificil... Cara, já tive problemas assim muito misterioso mesmo. Lembro que troquei de mirror, e só resolveu quado passei de http p/ ftp (ou foi ao contrário? nao me lembro). -- Marcos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Abraços, Fabiano -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: apt-get problem
Have you tried other mirrors? -Original Message- From: Jess Portnoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:17 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: apt-get problem Hello list, I've installed debian unstable on my IMAC. My problem is with apt-get. I used a sniffer and verified a http file is transmitted properly but the problem seems to be that apt-get searches for base-installer_1.13_powerpc.udeb which does not exist, what does exist in all the mirrors I've tested is base-installer_1.13.4_powerpc.udeb so of course I get 404 error. Has any of you run across this before and can provide insights? Thanks in advance, -- Use Linux - live longer Best regards, Jess Portnoy Lingnu open source consulting -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
Yes, I have: /base-installer_1.13_powerpc.udeb which does not exist, what does exist *in all the mirrors I've tested* is base-installer_1.13.4_powerpc.udeb/ I've tested 3 different mirrors. Use Linux - live longer Best regards, Jess Portnoy Rob Brenart (TT) wrote: Have you tried other mirrors? -Original Message- From: Jess Portnoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:17 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: apt-get problem Hello list, I've installed debian unstable on my IMAC. My problem is with apt-get. I used a sniffer and verified a http file is transmitted properly but the problem seems to be that apt-get searches for base-installer_1.13_powerpc.udeb which does not exist, what does exist in all the mirrors I've tested is base-installer_1.13.4_powerpc.udeb so of course I get 404 error. Has any of you run across this before and can provide insights? Thanks in advance, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
server:/home/mike# apt-get install postfix Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done 1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 102 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/611kB of archives. After unpacking 540kB will be used. Preconfiguring packages ... --output-fd: unknown option debconf: whiptail output to the above errors, giving up! I don't think there's anything wrong with your system. I think there's an error in the postfix install scripts. You should file a bug report against postfix. Good luck, Andrew. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
Moin, On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:21:43AM +0100, Peter Mathis wrote: Hallo, Ich hatte zu Testzwecken versucht evolution zu installieren, was aber aus unstable? nicht funktionierte. apt-get remove evolution bringt u.a. Fehlermeldung. Dummerweise kann ich jetzt auch nichts installieren, da er erst evolution entfernen will. er ist IMHO uebrigens sie; starte mal apt-get moo um zu wissen warum ;-) [...] Wie kann ich hier weiter vorgehen? Wahrscheinlich nur ueber die brutale Methode: dpkg --force-remove-reinstreq remove evolution Tu Dir selbst bitte den Gefallen, die manpage zu dpkg zu lesen, um eine Idee zu bekommen, was bei solchen Befehlen schief gehen kann. Gruss -- hgb -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get problem
Hans-Georg Bork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Moin, On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:21:43AM +0100, Peter Mathis wrote: Hallo, Ich hatte zu Testzwecken versucht evolution zu installieren, was aber aus unstable? nicht funktionierte. apt-get remove evolution bringt u.a. Fehlermeldung. Dummerweise kann ich jetzt auch nichts installieren, da er erst evolution entfernen will. er ist IMHO uebrigens sie; starte mal apt-get moo um zu wissen warum ;-) Und daraus erkennst du ein weibchen: ridcully:~# apt-get moo (__) (oo) /--\/ / ||| * /\---/\ ~~ ~~ Have you mooed today?... Heino -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
Am 2003-12-22 18:33:08, schrieb Heino Tiedemann: Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Danach zeigte mir [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy mozilla-browser mozilla-browser: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 Version Table: 2:1.2.1-2.bunk 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 0 500 http://ftp.de.debian.org woody/main Packages 500 http://security.debian.org woody/updates/main Packages 2:0.9.9-6 0 500 cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 beta _Woody_ - fsn.hu unofficial i386 Binary-1 (20020515)] unstable/main Packages Meine Frage: Warum steht da immer noch die bunk-Version drin? Das weiss ich ehlrich gesagt nicht. Bist Du sicher das Du apt-get update richtig ausgeführt hast ? Ich würde gerne die Version 1.0.0 installieren. wirst Du auch, die ist nämlich jetzt candidate. Aber warum willst Du das ? Die Version ist Doch krank ! Die Version 1.5 von backports.org funktioniert doch einwandfrei. Außerdem haben jetzt die meisten Dialoge Window-Dekorationen, damit Du sie verschieben kannst ! (Im Save-Dialog von 1.0 ein ärgerlicher BUG) Grüße Michelle -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am 2003-12-22 18:33:08, schrieb Heino Tiedemann: Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Danach zeigte mir [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy mozilla-browser mozilla-browser: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 Version Table: 2:1.2.1-2.bunk 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 0 500 http://ftp.de.debian.org woody/main Packages 500 http://security.debian.org woody/updates/main Packages 2:0.9.9-6 0 500 cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 beta _Woody_ - fsn.hu unofficial i386 Binary-1 (20020515)] unstable/main Packages Meine Frage: Warum steht da immer noch die bunk-Version drin? Das weiss ich ehlrich gesagt nicht. Bist Du sicher das Du apt-get update richtig ausgeführt hast ? Ich? ich war nicht der OP. du bist in der falschen Antwortebene. Ich würde gerne die Version 1.0.0 installieren. wirst Du auch, die ist nämlich jetzt candidate. Aber warum willst Du das ? Ich? Ich will das nicht ;-) Die Version ist Doch krank ! Ack Die Version 1.5 von backports.org funktioniert doch einwandfrei. Ack! Außerdem haben jetzt die meisten Dialoge Window-Dekorationen, damit Du sie verschieben kannst ! (Im Save-Dialog von 1.0 ein ärgerlicher BUG) Grüße Michelle Michelle, ich stimmer Dir in allen Ounkten zu, und deswegen: antworte lieber dem OP ;-)) Heino -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
* =?iso-8859-1?Q? Ulrich=20F=FCrst ?= wrote: Nachdem ich verschiedentlich Probleme mit Mozilla unter Debian woody hatte, (zunächst Version 1.5 von backports.org, jetzt 1.2.1 von bunk) wollte ich mal die Version von woody selber nehmen. Wenn du Probleme hast, solltest du das den zustaendigen Personen auch mitteilen, damit die diese Probleme u.U. aus der Welt schaffen koennen. [...] Meine Frage: Warum steht da immer noch die bunk-Version drin? Vermutlich weil diese noch nicht vollstaendig entfernt ist. Norbert -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 03:04:53PM +0100, =?iso-8859-1?Q? Ulrich=20F=FCrst ?= wrote: Um einen weiteren Fast-GAU zu verhindern, bitte ich jetzt doch mal um Hilfe! Nachdem ich verschiedentlich Probleme mit Mozilla unter Debian woody hatte, (zunächst Version 1.5 von backports.org, jetzt 1.2.1 von bunk) wollte ich mal die Version von woody selber nehmen. Also hab ich die Quellen der o.g. Installationen in der apt-sources.list auskommentiert und apt-get update ausgeführt. Nachdem das nix half hab ich einfach mal den (sowieso nicht funktionierenden) Mozilla-Browser deinsalliert (apt-get remove mozilla-browser). Wobei er noch 3 weitere mitdeinstalliert hat. The following packages will be REMOVED: mozilla mozilla-browser mozilla-mailnews mozilla-psm Danach zeigte mir [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy mozilla-browser mozilla-browser: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 Version Table: 2:1.2.1-2.bunk 0 Du scheinst Du bunk-1 sourcen immer noch in der sources.list zu haben und da dort ein Mozille mit der Version 1.2.1 liegt wird dieser der Version 1.0.0 aus woody vorgezogen. Ich wuerde Dir aber empfehlen bei der 1.5.x version von backports.org zu bleiben. Alles andere versetzt Dich um Jahre zurueck in die Vergangenheit. Sven -- Das Weihnachtskonzert COMBO GUANO 23.12.2003, Saal Norhausen Lev. Rheindorf http://www.comboguano.de -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 15:17:15: Meine Frage: Warum steht da immer noch die bunk-Version drin? Vermutlich weil diese noch nicht vollstaendig entfernt ist. Norbert O.k., laut apt-get ist sie das aber! debian:/home/ulrich# apt-get remove mozilla Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Package mozilla is not installed, so not removed 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. debian:/home/ulrich# apt-get remove mozilla-browser Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Package mozilla-browser is not installed, so not removed 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. d Soll ich die verbleibenden Verzeichnisse per Hand löschen? /var/local/cache/mozilla/ not empty, so not removed? bzw. verschieben, weil da alle Mails etc. gespeichert sind. Gruß Ulrich Fürst -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl) __ UNICEF bringt Kriegskinder in die Schule - helfen Sie mit! https://www.unicef.de/spe/spe_03.php -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 15:21:07: Danach zeigte mir [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy mozilla-browser mozilla-browser: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 Version Table: 2:1.2.1-2.bunk 0 Du scheinst Du bunk-1 sourcen immer noch in der sources.list zu haben und da dort ein Mozille mit der Version 1.2.1 liegt wird dieser der Version 1.0.0 aus woody vorgezogen. Ja, aber die ist auskommentiert: #deb http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/debian woody/bunk-1 contrib non-free #deb-src http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/debian woody/bunk-1 contrib non-free # stable main Ich wuerde Dir aber empfehlen bei der 1.5.x version von backports.org zu bleiben. Alles andere versetzt Dich um Jahre zurueck in die Vergangenheit. Da war, soweit ich mich erinnere, das Problem das mozilla-psm wg. einer Abhängigkeit nicht vollständig installiert werden konnte (und auch die Rechtschreibprüfung fehlte, was weniger tragisch ist, aber das ist das was ich noch weiß). Gruß Ulrich Fürst -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl) __ Nachrichten, Musik und Spiele schnell und einfach per Quickstart im WEB.DE Screensaver - Gratis downloaden: http://screensaver.web.de/?mc=021110 -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
* =?iso-8859-1?Q? Ulrich=20F=FCrst ?= wrote: Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 15:17:15: Meine Frage: Warum steht da immer noch die bunk-Version drin? Vermutlich weil diese noch nicht vollstaendig entfernt ist. Norbert O.k., laut apt-get ist sie das aber! dpkg -l | grep mozilla sagt was? Soll ich die verbleibenden Verzeichnisse per Hand löschen? Das sollte dpkg --purge erledigen. Du moechtest uebrigends noch einen Blick auf den Abschnitt Code of conduct aus http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ werfen. Norbert -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 17:05:31: Was sagt dpkg -l | grep mozilla ? dpkg -l | grep mozilla rc mozilla-browse 1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - core and browser rc mozilla-mailne 1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - mail and news support rc mozilla-psm1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - Personal Security Mana Das sollte dpkg --purge erledigen. für (mozilla-browser, -psm, -mailnews) Es tut zumindes etwas. ABer: bei danach ausgeführtem apt-get -s install mozilla Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: mozilla: Depends: mozilla-browser (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: mozilla-mailnews (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: mozilla-psm (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be installed und selbiges, weil: mozilla-browser: Depends: libnspr4 (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but 2:1.2.1-2.bunk is to be installed Du moechtest uebrigends noch einen Blick auf den Abschnitt Code of conduct aus http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ werfen. Entschuldigung aber ich finde da nix, es sei den auch Dir wurde eine Vervollständigungsmail von WEB.de gesendet. Ich möchte mich in diesem Fall dafür bei Dir und allen anderen Betroffenen entschuldigen. Ich hab da wohl beim Filter konfigurieren einen Falschen Button erwischt! Und da ich das gleich bei einigen Adressen gleichzeitig angewendet habe, die Adressen zu merken und ab da nicht mehr als 'unbekann' zu markieren, betrifft das wie ich befürchte ca. 10 Teilnehmer dieser Liste. Wird nicht wieder vorkommen! Vielen Dank, das Du mir trotzdem hilfst! Ulrich Fürst -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl) __ UNICEF bringt Kriegskinder in die Schule - helfen Sie mit! https://www.unicef.de/spe/spe_03.php -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
* =?iso-8859-1?Q? Ulrich=20F=FCrst ?= wrote: Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 17:05:31: Was sagt dpkg -l | grep mozilla ? dpkg -l | grep mozilla rc mozilla-browse 1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - core and browser rc mozilla-mailne 1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - mail and news support rc mozilla-psm1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - Personal Security Mana Ist also noch nicht vollstaendig entfernt. dpkg --purge mozilla-psm mozilla-mailnews mozilla-browser Das sollte dpkg --purge erledigen. für (mozilla-browser, -psm, -mailnews) Es tut zumindes etwas. ABer: bei danach ausgeführtem apt-get -s install mozilla Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: mozilla: Depends: mozilla-browser (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: mozilla-mailnews (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: mozilla-psm (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be installed und selbiges, weil: mozilla-browser: Depends: libnspr4 (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but 2:1.2.1-2.bunk is to be installed dpkg -l | grep libnspr4 sagt was? Du moechtest uebrigends noch einen Blick auf den Abschnitt Code of conduct aus http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ werfen. Entschuldigung aber ich finde da nix, es sei den auch Dir wurde eine Vervollständigungsmail von WEB.de gesendet. Keine Ahnung was du unter Vervollstaendigungsmail verstehst, es ging mir aber um das zusaetzliche und ueberfluessige CC. Norbert -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
* =?iso-8859-1?Q? Ulrich=20F=FCrst ?= wrote: Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 15:21:07: Ich wuerde Dir aber empfehlen bei der 1.5.x version von backports.org zu bleiben. Alles andere versetzt Dich um Jahre zurueck in die Vergangenheit. Da war, soweit ich mich erinnere, das Problem das mozilla-psm wg. einer Abhängigkeit nicht vollständig installiert werden konnte Kann ich hier nicht nachvollziehen. Norbert -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Um einen weiteren Fast-GAU zu verhindern, bitte ich jetzt doch mal um Hilfe! Nachdem ich verschiedentlich Probleme mit Mozilla unter Debian woody hatte, (zunächst Version 1.5 von backports.org, jetzt 1.2.1 von bunk) wollte ich mal die Version von woody selber nehmen. Also hab ich die Quellen der o.g. Installationen in der apt-sources.list auskommentiert und apt-get update ausgeführt. Nachdem das nix half hab ich einfach mal den (sowieso nicht funktionierenden) Mozilla-Browser deinsalliert (apt-get remove mozilla-browser). Wobei er noch 3 weitere mitdeinstalliert hat. The following packages will be REMOVED: mozilla mozilla-browser mozilla-mailnews mozilla-psm logisch. Du hast die vollen Vorteile des APT-Systems kennengelernt. Danach zeigte mir [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy mozilla-browser mozilla-browser: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 Version Table: 2:1.2.1-2.bunk 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 0 500 http://ftp.de.debian.org woody/main Packages 500 http://security.debian.org woody/updates/main Packages 2:0.9.9-6 0 500 cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 beta _Woody_ - fsn.hu unofficial i386 Binary-1 (20020515)] unstable/main Packages Meine Frage: Warum steht da immer noch die bunk-Version drin? Das weiss ich ehlrich gesagt nicht. Ich würde gerne die Version 1.0.0 installieren. wirst Du auch, die ist nämlich jetzt candidate. Du hättest auch apt-get --reinstall install mozilla/stable machen können, dann hättest du dir das deinstallieren gespart. Es sollte auch das hier funktionieren: apt-get --reinstall install mozilla=2:1.0.0-0.woody.1 damit bestimmst die die Version des Paketes, nicht die Distribution, aus der es kommen soll. Heino -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: mozilla: Depends: mozilla-browser (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: mozilla-mailnews (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: mozilla-psm (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be installed und selbiges, weil: mozilla-browser: Depends: libnspr4 (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but 2:1.2.1-2.bunk is to be installed Was sagt apt-cache policy libnspr4 Heino -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem (?) beim installieren von Mozilla
Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 17:05:31: Was sagt dpkg -l | grep mozilla ? dpkg -l | grep mozilla rc mozilla-browse 1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - core and browser rc mozilla-mailne 1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - mail and news support rc mozilla-psm1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - Personal Security Mana Wenn du mal den Kopf der Ausgabe anschaust, also ohne grep, dann siehst du die Erklärung für die Buchstaben am Zeilenanfang: Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-=-=-== ii wine 0.0.20031118-0.bunk Windows Emulator (Binary Emulator) Der Großbuchstabe entscheidet, wine ist bei mir (erste Spalte, Desired) auf install, mozilla-* sind bei dir auf remove. Remove bedeutet aber, dass zwar das Programm entfernt wird, aber die config-Dateien erhalten bleiben. Das ist meistens ziemlich gut, weil man sich Arbeit spart, wenn man das Programm doch mal wieder installiert. Dass die Config-Dateien noch da sind sieht man an der zweiten Spalte, Status, wo das c steht. Das sollte dpkg --purge erledigen. für (mozilla-browser, -psm, -mailnews) Wenn man es vorher weiß, geht es auch mit apt-get --purge remove $paketname Aber wenn der Status schon r ist, macht das (blöderweise, finde ich), nichts mehr. Gruß, Frank -- Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get problem (on debian sid)
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 13:32:56 +0100 Tim Broddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... I have this idea that my local package database might be broken (?) since it's impossible that there haven't been any package updates to sid last week. Anyone has any ideas on fixing this? ... Hi It is possible and is tue the compromise of some debian project servers (this was also discussed on this listif you take a look at incoming.debian.org you will see that there are packages hanging there...so be patient and wait until all problems are fixed... (for more information have a look at the maillinglist) yours Albert -- Albert Dengg [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: apt-get problem (on debian sid)
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 07:32, Tim Broddin wrote: Since some days I don't get any upgradable packages when doing an apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade (0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded). First I thought it had something to do with an old Packages file being cached in the proxy server. I then did a grep on the Packages file for gaim (which I knew was at version 0.72) and it showed up correctly. I have this idea that my local package database might be broken (?) since it's impossible that there haven't been any package updates to sid last week. Anyone has any ideas on fixing this? Oh it is possible that nothing has been processed since the widely reported Debian machine compromises happened. The Debian Archive Pool has not been compromised. Things will get cranking sometime soon... just wait. -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] REMEMBER ED CURRY! http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: apt-get problem (on debian sid)
Thanx for the reply both. Stupid me, thought I nuked my system :) On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 16:22, Greg Folkert wrote: On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 07:32, Tim Broddin wrote: Since some days I don't get any upgradable packages when doing an apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade (0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded). First I thought it had something to do with an old Packages file being cached in the proxy server. I then did a grep on the Packages file for gaim (which I knew was at version 0.72) and it showed up correctly. I have this idea that my local package database might be broken (?) since it's impossible that there haven't been any package updates to sid last week. Anyone has any ideas on fixing this? Oh it is possible that nothing has been processed since the widely reported Debian machine compromises happened. The Debian Archive Pool has not been compromised. Things will get cranking sometime soon... just wait. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
begin Dany Joly quote from Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 02:14:50PM + Here are my errors message : remove an other package : dpkp : serious warning files list file for package 'xfonts-base' missing, assuming package has no files currently installed. 12118 files currently installed.) Preparing to replace xfonts-base 4.1.0-16 (using ../xfonts-base_4.1.0-16.deb) ... Unpacking replacement xfonts-base ... here it freezes Something has gone horribly wrong, and now dpkg doesn't know what files xfonts-base is supposed to contain. You may be able to hack around it by running touch /var/lib/dpkg/info/xfonts-base.list and then dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/xfonts-base_4.1.0-16.deb. -- Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Do I look like I want a CC? Words of the day: SSL corporate security credit card ISEC global Manfurov Hi, VeriSign! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: apt-get problem (bug in apt-get?)
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 09:37:25PM -0500, Terry Hancock wrote: On Monday 22 September 2003 08:32 pm, Darryl Barlow wrote: Are you running unstable? If so, as of the last time I checked, the kdemultimedia package is broken. A bug report was filed some time ago but it has not yet been fixed. This is one of the joys of running unstable and the price to be paid for running a more cutting edge distribution. Personally I find it remarkably stable but these things do happen from time to time. Well, I'm actually running a mixed system with stable preferred (but libc6 and other development packages are from unstable). So it's not a flat single distribution system -- and that may indeed be why I'm running into this kind of grief. Quite possibly. I'd *strongly* recommend not doing that. There's basically no point running stable if you're just going to upgrade its libc6 to unstable ... apt-get is known to react badly to slightly inconsistent systems, and those are very easy to set up when trying to mix stable and unstable. But apt-get is refusing to *recognize* that it is installed at some times (when it's a dependency), but insisting that it is at other times (when you try to install it or when it conflicts). 'apt-get -f install' might help; but I think I'd use a more sophisticated package manager to try to figure this out, not apt-get which was originally written as a test utility for the apt library and which doesn't have much facility for interacting with the user. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 01:37:26PM -0400, Vivek Kumar wrote: I was trying to get updates using apt-get and i got following error message: Failed to fetch http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found Kindly help ... potato is old enough that it's been moved to the archive. It's now: deb http://archive.debian.org potato main Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem (bug in apt-get?)
Are you running unstable? If so, as of the last time I checked, the kdemultimedia package is broken. A bug report was filed some time ago but it has not yet been fixed. This is one of the joys of running unstable and the price to be paid for running a more cutting edge distribution. Personally I find it remarkably stable but these things do happen from time to time. I'd say your problem is with the version of the package rather than the package itself not being installed. I think you will find all will install fine when the bug is resolved. If you are really desperate you can force the install of whatever package has the unresolved dependency and hope it works or that you can make it work by symlinking libraries etc,. or perhaps install from source. The better option is probably to wait. -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Vivek Kumar wrote: Hi , I was trying to get updates using apt-get and i got following error message: Failed to fetch http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found Likely wouldn't be any updates anyways, as potato support was discontinued in June 2003. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 01:37:26PM -0400, Vivek Kumar wrote: | Hi , | I was trying to get updates using apt-get and i got following error | message: | | Failed to fetch | http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/Packages | 404 Not Found Upgrade to Woody. Potato is no longer supported, and thus mirrors are likely to no longer provide potato. -D -- If Microsoft would build a car... ... Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have to pull over to the side of the road, close all of the car windows, shut it off, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue. For some reason you would simply accept this. http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/ pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: apt-get problem (bug in apt-get?)
On Monday 22 September 2003 08:32 pm, Darryl Barlow wrote: Are you running unstable? If so, as of the last time I checked, the kdemultimedia package is broken. A bug report was filed some time ago but it has not yet been fixed. This is one of the joys of running unstable and the price to be paid for running a more cutting edge distribution. Personally I find it remarkably stable but these things do happen from time to time. Well, I'm actually running a mixed system with stable preferred (but libc6 and other development packages are from unstable). So it's not a flat single distribution system -- and that may indeed be why I'm running into this kind of grief. The version of kdebase-audiolibs I have is from testing. But the point is, I'm not having ANY technical problems with kdebase-audiolibs (my KDE environment has sound effects which I can hear as I use it, and games etc all have sound as expected). But apt-get is refusing to *recognize* that it is installed at some times (when it's a dependency), but insisting that it is at other times (when you try to install it or when it conflicts). I'd say your problem is with the version of the package rather than the package itself not being installed. I think you will find all will install fine when the bug is resolved. If you are really desperate you can force the install of whatever package has the unresolved dependency and hope it works or that you can make it work by symlinking libraries etc,. or perhaps install from source. Like I said -- it IS installed. Dpkg thinks so, and even apt-get thinks so when you ask it to install it again. And it works -- I use it everyday. But apt-get still complains that that it's not installed whenever I try to install something that depends on it. And it's NOT a version issue, because non of the packages in question ask for a specific version of the package, they just depend on kdebase-audiolibs OR kdebase3-audiolibs. I can work around it by using --reinstall and including kdebase-audiolibs on *every*single*usage* of apt-get. But that's just really stupid. Especially since that actually does cause it to reinstall needlessly. So you see, apt-get is making logically contradictory claims. So what we're talking about is a package database that contains a logical contradiction. And furthermore, the claim that the package is not installed is refuted by the simple fact that the program it installs is working just fine. So I'm still inclined to suspect that there is something wrong in the database, and therefore in the programs that manage it, rather than a problem in the package (of course, maybe the package has some irregularity that triggers this mismanagement, but that still should be under apt-get's control). Hopefully apt-get is not designed to assume that packages will cooperatively manage the database?! (Remember how successful cooperative multi-tasking was?). Unfortunately, even if this is all true, I don't have any way to know when or on what stimulus the problem occured, so it'd be nearly impossible to identify a specific bug to report. I was more wondering if anybody knew how to verify the contents of the Debian package database. I pretty much treat it as a black box, and never touch it. :-) The better option is probably to wait. Ah, but for what? ;-) Well, it's not crippling at the moment -- it's only blocking installation of a few games my kids want, and there are other ways around that. It's just a matter of maintenance. Cheers, Terry -- Terry Hancock ( hancock at anansispaceworks.com ) Anansi Spaceworks http://www.anansispaceworks.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
on Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:39:57PM +0100, Mark Ayliffe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I had a problem updating my two unstable machines this morning. I got the message Could not get lock /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (11 Resource temporarily unavailable). Looking through the archive of this illustrious list I found several suggestions that another copy of dselect (or presumably apt-get) must be running. This was not so, the first instance happened part way through the installation phase, after the download was complete. It also recurred after an init 1. Are you running as root? If not, do. I found that deleting /var/lib/dpkg/lock did not solve the problem and a new instance was created on each attempt. However deleting that file and /var/lib/dpkg/methlock allowed the installtion to complete successfully. Hrm. So your problem's solved? Try also: strace foo ...where foo is some command and arguments. Usually the error will be evident in output (note ther emay be lots of it). Peace. -- Karsten M. Self [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What Part of Gestalt don't you understand? By failing to protect the public interest in free access to the products of the inventive and artistic genius -- indeed, by virtually ignoring the central purpose of the Copyright/Patent Clause [in the Constitution] -- the Court has quitclaimed to Congress its principal responsibility in this area of the law. -- Justice Stevens, J., dissenting, Eldred v. Ashcroft pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: apt-get Problem
Am Mit, 2003-08-20 um 13.13 schrieb Werner Gast: Hallo Johannes, Hallo Werner, diese Meldungen hatte ich gestern auch. Ich bin dann auf Adrian Bunk's Download-Seite gegangen und habe die angemeckerten Pakete mit der Vorgabe 'ohne Versionscheck' einzeln installiert. Manchmal braucht man halt -f oder --force. Evolution laueft bei mir trotz der Fehlermeldung. Cu Evolution lief bei mir auch problemlos. Der Haken war da, dass ich keine weitere Software mehr installieren konnte. BTW, habe grade festgesellt dass einige Programme die sich mit den Backports installieren anscheinend noch auf GTK 1.X basieren. Ist etwas ärgerlich, wei man für die die tollen neuen Themes nicht benutzen kann. Hat jemand einen Tip wie ich das Aussehen dieser Anwendungen beeinflussen kann? Johannes -- Powerd by Debian Linux - http://www.debian.org -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem
Johannes Bedenbender schrieb: Hallo Liste, ich habe jetzt damit begonnen, auf Gnome 2.2 umzusteigen. Alles was ich brauche läuft soweit, ich würde jetzt nur noch gerne Galeon intallieren. Ein apt-get install galeon bringt: --- You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: evolution: Depends: libpisync0 but it is not going to be installed galeon: Depends: libgconf11 (= 1.0.7) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgnome-vfs0 (= 1.0.3-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: galeon-common (= 1.2.7-6woody2) but it is not going to be installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution). Sieht mir ganz nach einem Release-Problem aus. Was steht in /etc/apt/sources.list und /etc/apt/preferences? --- Also hab' ich ein apt-get -f install probiert. Da versucht apt-get nur libpisync0 zu installieren, klappt aber leider nicht: --- Entpacke libpisync0 (aus .../libpisync0_0.11.7-2woody2_i386.deb) ... dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von /var/cache/apt/archives/libpisync0_0.11.7-2woody2_i386.deb (--unpack): versuche »/usr/lib/libpisync.so.0.0.0« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket libpisock8 ist Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von: /var/cache/apt/archives/libpisync0_0.11.7-2woody2_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) --- Hatte ich auch schonmal, sowas. Was sagt dpkg -r libpisock8 bzw. apt-get remove libpisock8 ? Für eine genauere Diagnose müsste ich allerdings wirklich wissen, was in besagten Konfigurationsdateien steht. Sören -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem
Am Mit, 2003-08-20 um 12.43 schrieb Soeren D. Schulze: Hatte ich auch schonmal, sowas. Was sagt dpkg -r libpisock8 Das hat da Problem gelöst. Danke. apt-get remove libpisock8 Das hat das Problem nicht gelöst. Für eine genauere Diagnose müsste ich allerdings wirklich wissen, was in besagten Konfigurationsdateien steht. Hm, die sources.list habe ich, aber die prefernces gibt es bei mir nicht. Wofür wird die gebraucht? Vielen Dank auf jeden Fall schonmal, Johanes -- Powerd by Debian Linux - http://www.debian.org -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get Problem
Am Mit, 2003-08-20 um 12.26 schrieb Johannes Bedenbender: Ein apt-get install galeon bringt: evolution: Depends: libpisync0 but it is not going to be installed galeon: Depends: libgconf11 (= 1.0.7) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgnome-vfs0 (= 1.0.3-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: galeon-common (= 1.2.7-6woody2) but it is not going to be installed Hallo Johannes, diese Meldungen hatte ich gestern auch. Ich bin dann auf Adrian Bunk's Download-Seite gegangen und habe die angemeckerten Pakete mit der Vorgabe 'ohne Versionscheck' einzeln installiert. Manchmal braucht man halt -f oder --force. Evolution laueft bei mir trotz der Fehlermeldung. Cu -- Schoene Gruesse aus der Lüneburger Heide Werner Gast http://www.heidefewo.de Gaeste aus Baden-Wuerttemberg reisen ungern ab. Sie muessen schliesslich wieder zum Teufel fahren. -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: apt-get problem/evighets loop
Jag kommer tyvärr inteihåg vart jag hittatde apt källan men den är inte officiell har jag för mig, tror att jag hittade den på apt-get.org, så ev bug rapport borde nog inte gå till debian bug listan, hur som helst trode jag att det bara var jag som hade problem. Och för ögonblicket så kan jag inte installera något på mitt sys alls... :-( men jag ska försöka hitta rätt i pre/post-skriptet så jag kan få bort det. sedan lät det bra att använda freenet:s egna så jag kommer nog att använda det, även om jag hels vill apt-get:a :-) tack för hjälpen /joakim On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 21:46, Adam Huuva wrote: Fredrik Jonson wrote: On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Adam Huuva wrote: Att installera [freenet-unstable] gick inte för mig. Om man alldeles bortser från Rätt Sätt[tm] och buggrapporteringar mot debianpaketet som borde göras och så: Point taken. Fast det blir ju att man slingrar sig på såna punkter eller att man tänker att det säkert är nåt annat konstigt med just mitt system osv... eller att man när man ser att andra har löst problemet tänker att dom kanske har rapporterat det... det är ju en alldelens egen halvevig loop i sig... :) Och så är det ju extra jobb också, fast det kanske man skulle förväntas göra för att andra ideellt sliter med ett system som man själv använder gratis... jaja. Nu när jag fick inspiration (ahem..) att sätta mig in i hela bugrapporterings-tjosan så ser jag att buggen redan är rapporterad, och det för 208 dagar sedan. Det var bara någon vecka sedan jag provade att installera paketet... http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=177011 -- Adam Huuva V:a Esplanaden 11 - 953 37 Eurocity - Sweden, Finland Phone: +46-922-10599 - E-mail: aatami at home dot se
Re: apt-get problem/evighets loop
Jag har precis kolla upp det och det är ett officiellt paket jag installerat. Jag har googlat utan att hitta något bra på hur jag ändrar i post/pre-skript och även läst bug reporten utan att fatta hur jag ska lösa problemet, är det någon som kan informera om hur jag kan ändra i post/pre-skript för freenet-unstable paketet? Mvh Joakim On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 07:57, joakim wrote: Jag kommer tyvärr inteihåg vart jag hittatde apt källan men den är inte officiell har jag för mig, tror att jag hittade den på apt-get.org, så ev bug rapport borde nog inte gå till debian bug listan, hur som helst trode jag att det bara var jag som hade problem. Och för ögonblicket så kan jag inte installera något på mitt sys alls... :-( men jag ska försöka hitta rätt i pre/post-skriptet så jag kan få bort det. sedan lät det bra att använda freenet:s egna så jag kommer nog att använda det, även om jag hels vill apt-get:a :-) tack för hjälpen /joakim On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 21:46, Adam Huuva wrote: Fredrik Jonson wrote: On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Adam Huuva wrote: Att installera [freenet-unstable] gick inte för mig. Om man alldeles bortser från Rätt Sätt[tm] och buggrapporteringar mot debianpaketet som borde göras och så: Point taken. Fast det blir ju att man slingrar sig på såna punkter eller att man tänker att det säkert är nåt annat konstigt med just mitt system osv... eller att man när man ser att andra har löst problemet tänker att dom kanske har rapporterat det... det är ju en alldelens egen halvevig loop i sig... :) Och så är det ju extra jobb också, fast det kanske man skulle förväntas göra för att andra ideellt sliter med ett system som man själv använder gratis... jaja. Nu när jag fick inspiration (ahem..) att sätta mig in i hela bugrapporterings-tjosan så ser jag att buggen redan är rapporterad, och det för 208 dagar sedan. Det var bara någon vecka sedan jag provade att installera paketet... http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=177011 -- Adam Huuva V:a Esplanaden 11 - 953 37 Eurocity - Sweden, Finland Phone: +46-922-10599 - E-mail: aatami at home dot se
Re: apt-get problem/evighets loop
joakim wrote: Jag har precis kolla upp det och det är ett officiellt paket jag installerat. Jag har googlat utan att hitta något bra på hur jag ändrar i post/pre-skript och även läst bug reporten utan att fatta hur jag ska lösa problemet, är det någon som kan informera om hur jag kan ändra i post/pre-skript för freenet-unstable paketet? Som jag sa tidigare, så ta och googla med felmeddelandet (om jag minns rätt). Jag hade försökt åt dej om jag bara hade kommit ihåg den där raden. Pasta hit den så får vi se. Kanske nåt annat också, som apt-gets felmeddelande. -- Adam Huuva V:a Esplanaden 11 - 953 37 Eurocity - Sweden, Finland Phone: +46-922-10599 - E-mail: aatami at home dot se
Re: apt-get problem/evighets loop
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 09:12, joakim wrote: Jag har precis kolla upp det och det är ett officiellt paket jag installerat. Jag har googlat utan att hitta något bra på hur jag ändrar i post/pre-skript och även läst bug reporten utan att fatta hur jag ska lösa problemet, är det någon som kan informera om hur jag kan ändra i post/pre-skript för freenet-unstable paketet? Mvh Joakim On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 07:57, joakim wrote: Jag kommer tyvärr inteihåg vart jag hittatde apt källan men den är inte officiell har jag för mig, tror att jag hittade den på apt-get.org, så ev bug rapport borde nog inte gå till debian bug listan, hur som helst trode jag att det bara var jag som hade problem. Och för ögonblicket så kan jag inte installera något på mitt sys alls... :-( men jag ska försöka hitta rätt i pre/post-skriptet så jag kan få bort det. sedan lät det bra att använda freenet:s egna så jag kommer nog att använda det, även om jag hels vill apt-get:a :-) tack för hjälpen /joakim On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 21:46, Adam Huuva wrote: Fredrik Jonson wrote: On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Adam Huuva wrote: Att installera [freenet-unstable] gick inte för mig. Om man alldeles bortser från Rätt Sätt[tm] och buggrapporteringar mot debianpaketet som borde göras och så: Point taken. Fast det blir ju att man slingrar sig på såna punkter eller att man tänker att det säkert är nåt annat konstigt med just mitt system osv... eller att man när man ser att andra har löst problemet tänker att dom kanske har rapporterat det... det är ju en alldelens egen halvevig loop i sig... :) Och så är det ju extra jobb också, fast det kanske man skulle förväntas göra för att andra ideellt sliter med ett system som man själv använder gratis... jaja. Nu när jag fick inspiration (ahem..) att sätta mig in i hela bugrapporterings-tjosan så ser jag att buggen redan är rapporterad, och det för 208 dagar sedan. Det var bara någon vecka sedan jag provade att installera paketet... http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=177011 -- Adam Huuva V:a Esplanaden 11 - 953 37 Eurocity - Sweden, Finland Phone: +46-922-10599 - E-mail: aatami at home dot se Har inte läst hela tråden. En sak som funkat för mig i trassliga fall är att göra en apt-get remove paketnamn, alternativt dpkg remove paketnamn. Det kan förstås skita sig kapitalt. -- Jörgen Tegnér [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: apt-get problem/evighets loop
har testat det oxå, får samma svara då med. :-( # apt-get remove freenet-unstable E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to correct the problem. /joakim On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 09:53, Jörgen Tegnér wrote: On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 09:12, joakim wrote: Jag har precis kolla upp det och det är ett officiellt paket jag installerat. Jag har googlat utan att hitta något bra på hur jag ändrar i post/pre-skript och även läst bug reporten utan att fatta hur jag ska lösa problemet, är det någon som kan informera om hur jag kan ändra i post/pre-skript för freenet-unstable paketet? Mvh Joakim On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 07:57, joakim wrote: Jag kommer tyvärr inteihåg vart jag hittatde apt källan men den är inte officiell har jag för mig, tror att jag hittade den på apt-get.org, så ev bug rapport borde nog inte gå till debian bug listan, hur som helst trode jag att det bara var jag som hade problem. Och för ögonblicket så kan jag inte installera något på mitt sys alls... :-( men jag ska försöka hitta rätt i pre/post-skriptet så jag kan få bort det. sedan lät det bra att använda freenet:s egna så jag kommer nog att använda det, även om jag hels vill apt-get:a :-) tack för hjälpen /joakim On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 21:46, Adam Huuva wrote: Fredrik Jonson wrote: On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Adam Huuva wrote: Att installera [freenet-unstable] gick inte för mig. Om man alldeles bortser från Rätt Sätt[tm] och buggrapporteringar mot debianpaketet som borde göras och så: Point taken. Fast det blir ju att man slingrar sig på såna punkter eller att man tänker att det säkert är nåt annat konstigt med just mitt system osv... eller att man när man ser att andra har löst problemet tänker att dom kanske har rapporterat det... det är ju en alldelens egen halvevig loop i sig... :) Och så är det ju extra jobb också, fast det kanske man skulle förväntas göra för att andra ideellt sliter med ett system som man själv använder gratis... jaja. Nu när jag fick inspiration (ahem..) att sätta mig in i hela bugrapporterings-tjosan så ser jag att buggen redan är rapporterad, och det för 208 dagar sedan. Det var bara någon vecka sedan jag provade att installera paketet... http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=177011 -- Adam Huuva V:a Esplanaden 11 - 953 37 Eurocity - Sweden, Finland Phone: +46-922-10599 - E-mail: aatami at home dot se Har inte läst hela tråden. En sak som funkat för mig i trassliga fall är att göra en apt-get remove paketnamn, alternativt dpkg remove paketnamn. Det kan förstås skita sig kapitalt.
Re: apt-get problem/evighets loop
# apt-get upgrade E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to correct the problem. det är allt den säger, och som sagt kör man det så startar ok-loopen /joakim On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 09:44, Adam Huuva wrote: joakim wrote: Jag har precis kolla upp det och det är ett officiellt paket jag installerat. Jag har googlat utan att hitta något bra på hur jag ändrar i post/pre-skript och även läst bug reporten utan att fatta hur jag ska lösa problemet, är det någon som kan informera om hur jag kan ändra i post/pre-skript för freenet-unstable paketet? Som jag sa tidigare, så ta och googla med felmeddelandet (om jag minns rätt). Jag hade försökt åt dej om jag bara hade kommit ihåg den där raden. Pasta hit den så får vi se. Kanske nåt annat också, som apt-gets felmeddelande. -- Adam Huuva V:a Esplanaden 11 - 953 37 Eurocity - Sweden, Finland Phone: +46-922-10599 - E-mail: aatami at home dot se
Re: apt-get problem/evighets loop
joakim: har testat det oxå, får samma svara då med. :-( dpkg --purge paketnamn bör fungera, förutsatt att paketet inte har någon bugg i sitt postrm-skript. -- \\// Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ I do not read or respond to mail with HTML attachments.
Re: apt-get problem/evighets loop
joakim wrote: # apt-get upgrade E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to correct the problem. det är allt den säger, och som sagt kör man det så startar ok-loopen Ja men Gnu, jag menar förståss ok-loopens meddelande om portar 1 - 65xxx bla bla bla. Sök med den. Har du hittat filerna post/pre -osv? Var ligger dom? Har du försökt joxa i dem? -- Adam Huuva V:a Esplanaden 11 - 953 37 Eurocity - Sweden, Finland Phone: +46-922-10599 - E-mail: aatami at home dot se
Re: apt-get problem/evighets loop
# apt-get upgrade E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to correct the problem. det är allt den säger, och som sagt kör man det så startar ok-loopen /joakim On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 09:44, Adam Huuva wrote: joakim wrote: Jag har precis kolla upp det och det är ett officiellt paket jag installerat. Jag har googlat utan att hitta något bra på hur jag ändrar i post/pre-skript och även läst bug reporten utan att fatta hur jag ska lösa problemet, är det någon som kan informera om hur jag kan ändra i post/pre-skript för freenet-unstable paketet? Som jag sa tidigare, så ta och googla med felmeddelandet (om jag minns rätt). Jag hade försökt åt dej om jag bara hade kommit ihåg den där raden. Pasta hit den så får vi se. Kanske nåt annat också, som apt-gets felmeddelande. -- Adam Huuva V:a Esplanaden 11 - 953 37 Eurocity - Sweden, Finland Phone: +46-922-10599 - E-mail: aatami at home dot se
Re: apt-get problem/evighets loop
Jag hittade det precis allt det ligger i /var/lib/dpkg/info/ för alla installerade paket så nu ska jag nog kunna ordna till det hoppas jag på. /joakim On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 10:02, Adam Huuva wrote: joakim wrote: # apt-get upgrade E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to correct the problem. det är allt den säger, och som sagt kör man det så startar ok-loopen Ja men Gnu, jag menar förståss ok-loopens meddelande om portar 1 - 65xxx bla bla bla. Sök med den. Har du hittat filerna post/pre -osv? Var ligger dom? Har du försökt joxa i dem? -- Adam Huuva V:a Esplanaden 11 - 953 37 Eurocity - Sweden, Finland Phone: +46-922-10599 - E-mail: aatami at home dot se
Re: apt-get problem/evighets loop
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 09:52:42AM +0200, joakim wrote: # apt-get remove freenet-unstable E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to correct the problem. har du provat med dpkg --force-configure freenet-unstable? då slipper du att dpkg försöker konfigurera alla okonfigurerade paket (om du har några sådana dvs). eller apt-get --reinstall freenet-unstable? /Thomas -- == [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] == Encrypted e-mails preferred | GPG KeyID: 114AA85C -- pgpFnLvBBea4J.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: apt-get problem/evighets loop
jag provade precis och får tillsvar dpkg: unknown force/refuse option `configure' men jag har fått apt att fungerar något så där iaf, men freenet-unstable ligger kvar och det går inte att dpkg --purge då sätter loop:en igång igen, så frågan är om jag kan ta bort alla referenser till paketet i /var/lib/dpkg/status samt delete:a freenet-unstable.post och preinst filerna i /var/lib/dpkg/info/, kan man göra det utan att något annat blir berört? /joakim On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 13:18, Thomas Sjögren wrote: On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 09:52:42AM +0200, joakim wrote: # apt-get remove freenet-unstable E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to correct the problem. har du provat med dpkg --force-configure freenet-unstable? då slipper du att dpkg försöker konfigurera alla okonfigurerade paket (om du har några sådana dvs). eller apt-get --reinstall freenet-unstable? /Thomas
Re: apt-get problem/evighets loop
joakim wrote: jag provade precis och får tillsvar dpkg: unknown force/refuse option `configure' men jag har fått apt att fungerar något så där iaf, men freenet-unstable ligger kvar och det går inte att dpkg --purge då sätter loop:en igång igen, så frågan är om jag kan ta bort alla referenser till paketet i /var/lib/dpkg/status samt delete:a freenet-unstable.post och preinst filerna i /var/lib/dpkg/info/, kan man göra det utan att något annat blir berört? Nu borde du kunna gå in och lägga in en exit 0 tidigt i postrm-skriptet så blir det kanske bra med det. Förvisso är det möjligt att det kanske blir kvar nåt skräp då av paketet men... äh jag kan inte veta säkert. -- Adam Huuva V:a Esplanaden 11 - 953 37 Eurocity - Sweden, Finland Phone: +46-922-10599 - E-mail: aatami at home dot se
Re: apt-get problem/evighets loop
Adam Huuva wrote: Nu borde du kunna gå in och lägga in en exit 0 tidigt i postrm-skriptet så blir det kanske bra med det. Eller om det möjligtvis är prerm... -- Adam Huuva V:a Esplanaden 11 - 953 37 Eurocity - Sweden, Finland Phone: +46-922-10599 - E-mail: aatami at home dot se
Re: apt-get problem/evighets loop
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 02:13:57PM +0200, joakim wrote: jag provade precis och får tillsvar dpkg: unknown force/refuse option `configure' men jag har fått apt att fungerar något så där iaf, men freenet-unstable ligger kvar och det går inte att dpkg --purge då sätter loop:en igång igen, så frågan är om jag kan ta bort alla referenser till paketet i /var/lib/dpkg/status samt delete:a freenet-unstable.post och preinst filerna i /var/lib/dpkg/info/, kan man göra det utan att något annat blir berört? Ändra skriptet som inte fungerar, kör sedan dpkg --purge. -- Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066 77F1 7FF5 C2E6 7BF2 F228
Re: apt-get problem/evighets loop
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Adam Huuva wrote: Att installera [freenet-unstable] gick inte för mig. Om man alldeles bortser från Rätt Sätt[tm] och buggrapporteringar mot debianpaketet som borde göras och så: Freenet:s egna paket innehåller ett gulligt skalskript[0] för att uppdatera själva jarfilen. Så personligen har jag installerat freenet under /opt/freenet från freenets tarfil[1] och uppdaterar därifrån med jämna mellanrum. [0] ./update.sh (hämtar jar + seednodes.ref från freenetproject.org) [1] http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-0.5.2.1.tar.gz (under /snapshots/ finns även paket för freenet-unstable) -- Fredrik Jonson
Re: apt-get problem/evighets loop
Fredrik Jonson wrote: On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Adam Huuva wrote: Att installera [freenet-unstable] gick inte för mig. Om man alldeles bortser från Rätt Sätt[tm] och buggrapporteringar mot debianpaketet som borde göras och så: Point taken. Fast det blir ju att man slingrar sig på såna punkter eller att man tänker att det säkert är nåt annat konstigt med just mitt system osv... eller att man när man ser att andra har löst problemet tänker att dom kanske har rapporterat det... det är ju en alldelens egen halvevig loop i sig... :) Och så är det ju extra jobb också, fast det kanske man skulle förväntas göra för att andra ideellt sliter med ett system som man själv använder gratis... jaja. Nu när jag fick inspiration (ahem..) att sätta mig in i hela bugrapporterings-tjosan så ser jag att buggen redan är rapporterad, och det för 208 dagar sedan. Det var bara någon vecka sedan jag provade att installera paketet... http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=177011 -- Adam Huuva V:a Esplanaden 11 - 953 37 Eurocity - Sweden, Finland Phone: +46-922-10599 - E-mail: aatami at home dot se
Re: apt-get Problem
* Gerhard Engler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: python-apt: Depends: libapt-inst-libc6.3-5-1.0 Depends: libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3 Wie löse ich das Problem? Das kommt bei testing leider ab und an mal vor. Nimm das python-apt Package aus unstable. -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: Apt-get problem
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:59:53AM -0500, Jeff Elkins wrote: Thanks Paul, I installed off a Knoppix CD and the login says testing/unstable. I've probably screwed things up, but this is totally experimentation on an extra partition. For instance, I changed my sources.list to point to unstable and did a dist-upgrade. Ah. KDE3 is coming into sid slowly, so it's not actually installable at the moment :) As Paul said, just wait it out. -- Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ertius.org/ msg30072/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Apt-get problem
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:59:53AM -0500, Jeff Elkins wrote: Originally I was using a self-compiled QT/KDE 3.1 on /usr/local, but I'm currently trying to apt-get KDE3.1 w/o much luck. Circular dependancy errors seem as bad as RPM ever was, but it may be self-induced :) I hope you didn't blow away your old KDE and just said no to the upgrades for now... -- .''`. Baloo [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than to fix a system msg30098/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Apt-get problem
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 05:56:30AM +0100, Jeff Elkins wrote: How can I repair this apt-get problem? -f does nothing. No, it wouldn't: -f solves a very different problem. Try: dpkg -i --force-overwrite /var/cache/apt/archives/libarts1_1.1.0-2_i386.deb Normally I'd suggest filing a bug report too, but I don't think there was ever a libarts1-bin in Debian. I think the unofficial KDE3 packages were always provided with the understanding that you might have to remove and reinstall when the official packages arrived in unstable. Still, it might be worth a wishlist. -- Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apt-get problem
Thanks, Colin. As a Debian newbie I would have figured that out in a year or so :) Jeff Elkins On Monday 10 February 2003 12:27 pm, Colin Watson wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 05:56:30AM +0100, Jeff Elkins wrote: How can I repair this apt-get problem? -f does nothing. No, it wouldn't: -f solves a very different problem. Try: dpkg -i --force-overwrite /var/cache/apt/archives/libarts1_1.1.0-2_i386.deb Normally I'd suggest filing a bug report too, but I don't think there was ever a libarts1-bin in Debian. I think the unofficial KDE3 packages were always provided with the understanding that you might have to remove and reinstall when the official packages arrived in unstable. Still, it might be worth a wishlist. -- Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apt-get problem
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 05:56:30AM +0100, Jeff Elkins wrote: How can I repair this apt-get problem? -f does nothing. I can't tell by the version numbers off the top of my head, but if you're using unstable, wait it out until the next update and try again. -- .''`. Baloo [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than to fix a system msg29909/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Apt-get problem
Thanks Paul, I installed off a Knoppix CD and the login says testing/unstable. I've probably screwed things up, but this is totally experimentation on an extra partition. For instance, I changed my sources.list to point to unstable and did a dist-upgrade. Originally I was using a self-compiled QT/KDE 3.1 on /usr/local, but I'm currently trying to apt-get KDE3.1 w/o much luck. Circular dependancy errors seem as bad as RPM ever was, but it may be self-induced :) Jeff Elkins On Monday 10 February 2003 10:22 am, Paul Johnson wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 05:56:30AM +0100, Jeff Elkins wrote: How can I repair this apt-get problem? -f does nothing. I can't tell by the version numbers off the top of my head, but if you're using unstable, wait it out until the next update and try again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 10:31:45PM -0500, Jerome Acks Jr wrote: On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 03:36:53PM -0500, Trey Sizemore wrote: [snip good advice] cd /var/cache/apt/archives dpkg --force-overwrite -i kdelibs-dcop_4%3a3.1.0+rc6+kl-3_i386.deb dpkg --force-overwrite -i libkdefx4_4%3a3.1.0+rc6+kl-3_i386.deb and then continue with the apt-get install. Don't forget to tell whoever made these packages about the bug (NOT on the BTS, since KDE3.1 isn't Debian yet). -rob msg27082/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: apt-get problem
I would do the following. remove the package kdelibs-bin from
/var/lib/dpkg/status making sure that I have a copy of the original file.
then make the same query to apt-get and see if it overwrites the files
causing the problem.
remember that you may have the same problem if you try to reinstall
kdelibs-bin
Some times the problem is simply that you do not have the proper
permissions.
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Trey Sizemore wrote:
While trying fix some broken packages, I ran apt-get -f install from my
terminal...after all packages were downloaded, I got the following
error(s):
etched 49.1MB in 19m6s (42.8kB/s)
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 159964 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking kdelibs-dcop (from
.../kdelibs-dcop_4%3a3.1.0+rc6+kl-3_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs-dcop_4%3a3.1.0+rc6+kl-3_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/dcop', which is also in package
kdelibs-bin
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Unpacking libkdefx4 (from .../libkdefx4_4%3a3.1.0+rc6+kl-3_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libkdefx4_4%3a3.1.0+rc6+kl-3_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libkdefx.so.4.1.0', which is also in
package kdelibs4
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs-dcop_4%3a3.1.0+rc6+kl-3_i386.deb
/var/cache/apt/archives/libkdefx4_4%3a3.1.0+rc6+kl-3_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
What is this error telling me ('broken pipe') and, I guess more
importantly, how can I fix this? I know there are several sources for
kde3 packages. SHould I try a different source? Here is my
sources.list:
#Libranet
deb http://libranetlinux.com updates/2.7/
deb http://libranetlinux.com security/2.7/
#Debian
deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian sid main contrib non-free
#deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian sid main contrib non-free
#Debian Non-US
deb http://non-us.debian.org/ sid/non-US main contrib non-free
#deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/ sid/non-US main contrib non-free
#Debian security updates
deb ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security stable/updates main contrib
non-free
#deb-src ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security stable/updates main
contrib non-free
#Evolution
deb http://red-carpet.ximian.com/debian woody main
deb http://ftp.freenet.de/pub/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/ woody main
contrib
#deb http://ktown.kde.org/~nolden/kde/woody/i386/ ./
deb http://marillat.free.fr/ testing main
deb http://wh9.tu-dresden.de/kde3/karolina/ ./
Thanks for help.
--
Trey Sizemore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 03:36:53PM -0500, Trey Sizemore wrote:
While trying fix some broken packages, I ran apt-get -f install from my
terminal...after all packages were downloaded, I got the following
error(s):
etched 49.1MB in 19m6s (42.8kB/s)
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 159964 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking kdelibs-dcop (from
.../kdelibs-dcop_4%3a3.1.0+rc6+kl-3_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs-dcop_4%3a3.1.0+rc6+kl-3_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/dcop', which is also in package
kdelibs-bin
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Unpacking libkdefx4 (from .../libkdefx4_4%3a3.1.0+rc6+kl-3_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libkdefx4_4%3a3.1.0+rc6+kl-3_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libkdefx.so.4.1.0', which is also in
package kdelibs4
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs-dcop_4%3a3.1.0+rc6+kl-3_i386.deb
/var/cache/apt/archives/libkdefx4_4%3a3.1.0+rc6+kl-3_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
What is this error telling me ('broken pipe') and, I guess more
importantly, how can I fix this? I know there are several sources for
kde3 packages. SHould I try a different source? Here is my
sources.list:
The broken pipe results from /usr/bin/dcop being found in two
different debs, and dpkg is complaining about it.
If you want to continue, one way to force the install would be:
cd /var/cache/apt/archives
dpkg --force-overwrite -i kdelibs-dcop_4%3a3.1.0+rc6+kl-3_i386.deb
dpkg --force-overwrite -i libkdefx4_4%3a3.1.0+rc6+kl-3_i386.deb
and then continue with the apt-get install.
#Libranet
deb http://libranetlinux.com updates/2.7/
deb http://libranetlinux.com security/2.7/
#Debian
deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian sid main contrib non-free
#deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian sid main contrib non-free
#Debian Non-US
deb http://non-us.debian.org/ sid/non-US main contrib non-free
#deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/ sid/non-US main contrib non-free
#Debian security updates
deb ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security stable/updates main contrib
non-free
#deb-src ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security stable/updates main
contrib non-free
#Evolution
deb http://red-carpet.ximian.com/debian woody main
deb http://ftp.freenet.de/pub/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/ woody main
contrib
#deb http://ktown.kde.org/~nolden/kde/woody/i386/ ./
deb http://marillat.free.fr/ testing main
deb http://wh9.tu-dresden.de/kde3/karolina/ ./
Thanks for help.
--
Jerome
msg26508/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: Apt-get problem with libc
Curtis Call was roused into action on 2003-01-24 15:57 and wrote: Disclaimer, I'm a novice so bear with me. I've run into some problems with apt-get. Currently, when trying to use 'apt-get -f install' to clean things up I continue to get this error: ogd2jpr6908:/home/curtis# apt-get -f install Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libc6 The following NEW packages will be installed: libc6 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 packages not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/3191kB of archives. After unpacking 12.4MB will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] E: Cannot get debconf version. Is debconf installed? (Reading database ... 11 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libc6 (from .../libc6_2.3.1-10_i386.deb) ... dpkg not recorded as installed, cannot check for epoch support ! dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.1-10_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.1-10_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I noticed that dpkg is complaining that perhaps it isn't installed? Any ideas of how to go about fixing this? No ideas but I have the exact same problem so you're not alone (and I've been using Debian for 2-3 years now). Myself, I was trying to install a Mozilla snapshot as it contains a new type of spam filter when I ran into this problem. -- David P. James 4th Year Economics Student Queen's University Kingston, Ontario http://members.rogers.com/dpjames/ The bureaucratic mentality is the only constant in the universe. -Dr. Leonard McCoy, Star Trek IV -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apt-get problem with libc
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 01:57:12PM -0700, Curtis Call wrote: Disclaimer, I'm a novice so bear with me. I've run into some problems with apt-get. Currently, when trying to use 'apt-get -f install' to clean things up I continue to get this error: ogd2jpr6908:/home/curtis# apt-get -f install Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libc6 The following NEW packages will be installed: libc6 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 packages not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/3191kB of archives. After unpacking 12.4MB will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] E: Cannot get debconf version. Is debconf installed? (Reading database ... 11 files and directories currently installed.) Since your system reports that only 11 files and directories are install, /var/lib/dpkg/status is probably badly damaged. I suspect a damaged filesystem or hardware that is failing. You should boot into single mode or boot from rescue disk and run fsck on the partition in which /var is located. After repairing any file system damage, replace the /var/lib/dpkg/status with a backup. Look in /var/backups for a recent backup of the status file. The backups will have names dpkg.status.0 or dpkg.status.[123456].gz. Good luck. Unpacking libc6 (from .../libc6_2.3.1-10_i386.deb) ... dpkg not recorded as installed, cannot check for epoch support ! dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.1-10_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.1-10_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I noticed that dpkg is complaining that perhaps it isn't installed? Any ideas of how to go about fixing this? Thanks -- Jerome msg26084/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: apt-get problem
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 09:17:59PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote: I keep getting the following error when I run 'apt-get update' Reading Package Lists... Error! E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room E: Error occured while processing kernel-headers-2.4.13-586-ext3 (NewPackage) E: Problem with MergeList /var/lib/dpkg/status E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened. Reading Package Lists... Error! E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room E: Error occured while processing kernel-headers-2.4.13-586-ext3 (NewPackage) E: Problem with MergeList /var/lib/dpkg/status E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened. If I remove some of the entries in my /etc/apt/sources.list the problem goes away. It's not always kernel-headers-2.4.13-586-ext3 and it's not always the same sources I have to remove. Is there a limit to how many entries you can have in your sources.list file? I had 18 originally. I've cut it down to 8. I still get this same problem. The 8 that I do have, which fail, are: deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main \ contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main contrib non-free deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free contrib deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main \ contrib non-free deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib deb http://termserv.berlios.de/debian stable main non-free deb http://ftp.freenet.de/pub/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/ woody \ main contrib Try upping your apt cache set APT::Cache-Limit 4194304; in apt.conf Good luck! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 10:15:53AM +0200, Cristi Banciu wrote: when I run apt-get update it says something like Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done W: Bizarre Error - File size is not what the server reported 0 84 W: Bizarre Error - File size is not what the server reported 0 88 W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems what is wrong ? This sounds like a problem on your mirror. Which one are you using and have you tried another one? -rob msg19097/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: apt-get problem
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 21:42, Conny Brunnkvist wrote: changing the cache size in /etc/apt/apt.config 'APT::Cache-Limits [number];' did not help and the Det var inte så att du skrev ...-Limits (pluralis) i stället för -Limit (singularis) va? ;-) Du, det där var ett skamligt förslag! Om du hade haft fel hade jag blivit väldigt förolämpad men du hade faktiskt rätt...;-) ...add the line 'APT::Cache-Limits xxx' stod det här: http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/archive/debian/user/2002/09/msg01080.html jag bara kopierade och klistrade APT::Cache-Limits från webbsidan utan att titta i man apt.conf...:-/ Oh well, the small things in life... Tack för din vakna blick, HÖ
Re: apt-get problem
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 02:53:10PM +0100, Helgi Örn Helgason wrote: Hello all! I have this problem since yesterday with apt-get on my laptop: -- Reading Package Lists... Error! E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room E: Error occured while processing kmtrace (NewVersion1) E: Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/lists/download.uk.kde.org_pub_kde_stable_latest_Debian_woody_._Packages E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened. -- changing the cache size in /etc/apt/apt.config 'APT::Cache-Limits [number];' did not help and the problem persists, I cannot use apt at all! How high did you set it? And now the same problem started on my stationary box too, I installed a program and when I wanted to install another one about 30 min later I got: -- Reading Package Lists... Error! E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room E: Error occured while processing kmtrace (NewVersion1) E: Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/lists/download.uk.kde.org_pub_kde_stable_latest_Debian_woody_._Packages E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened. Can this file be opened? How does it look? It should be of a similar format to the output of 'apt-cache show bleh'. -rob msg18345/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Apt-get problem
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 04:22:55PM -0700, curtis wrote: When I run apt-get update it will eventually stop and time out on an entry. deb http://www.mx1.ru/~chris/openoffice unstable main contrib deb-src http://www.mx1.ru/~chris/openoffice unstable main contrib I'm afraid that this server is unreachable at the moment - it's probably the problem. See http://www.linux-debian.de/openoffice/mirrors.html for a replacement. BTW, you don't need the 'deb-src' line unless you want to download the OpenOffice.org source... :) Chris Halls pgp4NbB8354bc.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Apt-get problem
One thing I noticed, which is probably just an artifact of word-wrapping on your mailer, but make sure that there's no newline in your deb ... lines. I'd be surprised if this didn't break stuff. Secondly, it looks like you're snagging all of the official debian stuff just fine. The problem looks to be with the sites in Russia, France, and wherever that mplayer site is. I'd make sure that you're pointing to the right spot there. A lot of those unofficial debian sites are out-of-date (no proof, just personal experience). HTH -- Stephen W. Juranich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Electrical Engineering http://students.washington.edu/sjuranic University of Washingtonhttp://ssli.ee.washington.edu/ssli -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apt-get problem
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 04:22:55PM -0700, curtis wrote: sources.list deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian woody main non-free contrib deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ woody main non-free contrib ^ deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US woody/non-US main contrib non-free deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US woody/non-US main contrib non-free deb http://www.mx1.ru/~chris/openoffice unstable main contrib deb-src http://www.mx1.ru/~chris/openoffice unstable main contrib deb http://mplayer.nmeos.net testing/ deb http://marillat.free.fr/ testing main ^ deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free ^ You shouldn't have a slash at the end of a URI. See man sources.list. Brian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 04:37:11PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: I am setting up a new box and I had woody and KDE installed from a CD I got several months ago. I was installing some more stuff and somehow ended up with the error output below. A step that occurred before this was to start an upgrade from both woody and sid without a preferences file. I aborted this in the middle of the download. I have tried many things to get back to normal and there are probably more things I need to know about APT to get out of this. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs3-bin_4%3a2.2.2-13_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/dcop', which is also in package kdelibs3 It's a bug in the KDE packages. Try 'dpkg --force-overwrite --install /var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs3_4:2.2.2-13_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs3-bin_4:2.2.2-13_i386.deb' as a workaround, then continue the apt run. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
Colin Watson wrote: On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 04:37:11PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: I am setting up a new box and I had woody and KDE installed from a CD I got several months ago. I was installing some more stuff and somehow ended up with the error output below. A step that occurred before this was to start an upgrade from both woody and sid without a preferences file. I aborted this in the middle of the download. I have tried many things to get back to normal and there are probably more things I need to know about APT to get out of this. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs3-bin_4%3a2.2.2-13_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/dcop', which is also in package kdelibs3 It's a bug in the KDE packages. Try 'dpkg --force-overwrite --install /var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs3_4:2.2.2-13_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs3-bin_4:2.2.2-13_i386.deb' as a workaround, then continue the apt run. Thanks. I found references to a problem with kdelibs3-crypt (sp?) but not one for this. This list is great. Pauln -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 11:16:33AM -0400, Sebastian Canagaratna wrote: I am using Debian Linux, Woody. I am trying to install gs-common and I had to use apt-get -f install This is what I get: Unpacking gs-common ( from gs-common ) dpkg: error processing /var/cache/ (--unpacking) trying to overwrite 'use/bin/bdftops', which is also in package ghostscript. Even after I moved /usr/bin/bdftops to another filename, I get the same error message. Also, there is no package called ghostscript. When I look at /var/lib/dpkg/status, it shows that gs-aladdin is not installed. How do I proceed? Try: dpkg --install --force-overwrite package_to_install Since you have already downloaded the package, you can find it in /var/cache/apt/archives. -- Jerome pgpVkj4RyD7e6.pgp Description: PGP signature
