Re: new kernel, new problems
--- Russell Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Tod wrote: So why can't modprobe find any of the modules - if indeed that's the problem - cause they're certainly where they're supposed to be. Looking through the output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* again suggests to me that it's some sort of dependency or configuration problem... the same comment appears again and again in the output Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters. What's that all about?! --- Russell Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Tod wrote: Surely I don't need to do make modules and make modules_install when I'm not compiling a kernel, just installing a pre-built one 2.4.20-686 (and the corresponding kernel-pcmcia-modules file)!? The output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* gives me the lengthy output in the attached file. How does this help? Can you verify this module is actually here?: /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o What does uname -a show? Don't top-post. ~$uname -a Linux orient 2.4.20-686 #1 Mon Jan 13 22:22:30 EST 2003 i686 Pentium III (Coppermine) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux so there doesn't look like there's anything wrong with that!? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] = --- Simon Tod [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: new kernel, new problems
Surely I don't need to do make modules and make modules_install when I'm not compiling a kernel, just installing a pre-built one 2.4.20-686 (and the corresponding kernel-pcmcia-modules file)!? The output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* gives me the lengthy output in the attached file. How does this help? --- Russell Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Tod wrote: Thanks. Got the cpu speed bit solved. Looking through the PCMCIA HowTo I've checked to see that /etc/pcmica/config, /etc/default/pcmcia and /etc/init.d/pcmica are the same under both kernels. My new kernel is missing the line serial_cs 4384 0 (unused) from lsmod. Try: depmod modprobe -a \* If that fixes the problem, maybe you should add the missing modules to /etc/modules. Did you do make modules, make modules_install when doing the kernel? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] = --- Simon Tod [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com = --- Simon Tod [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: new kernel, new problems
Surely I don't need to do make modules and make modules_install when I'm not compiling a kernel, just installing a pre-built one 2.4.20-686 (and the corresponding kernel-pcmcia-modules file)!? The output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* gives me the lengthy output in the attached file. How does this help? Opps. Forgot to attach the file last time :-0 --- Russell Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Tod wrote: Thanks. Got the cpu speed bit solved. Looking through the PCMCIA HowTo I've checked to see that /etc/pcmica/config, /etc/default/pcmcia and /etc/init.d/pcmica are the same under both kernels. My new kernel is missing the line serial_cs 4384 0 (unused) from lsmod. Try: depmod modprobe -a \* If that fixes the problem, maybe you should add the missing modules to /etc/modules. Did you do make modules, make modules_install when doing the kernel? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] = --- Simon Tod [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com = --- Simon Tod [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.comWarning: loading /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o will taint the kernel: no license See http://www.tux.org/lkml/#export-tainted for information about tainted modules /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o: init_module: No such device /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o failed Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters. You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg Warning: loading /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o will taint the kernel: no license /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o: init_module: No such device /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o failed Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters. You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg Warning: loading /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o will taint the kernel: no license /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o: init_module: No such device /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o failed Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters. You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg Warning: loading /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o will taint the kernel: no license /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o: init_module: No such device /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o failed Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters. You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg Warning: loading /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o will taint the kernel: no license /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o: init_module: No such device /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o failed Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters. You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg Warning: loading /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o will taint the kernel: no license /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o: init_module: No such device /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o failed Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters. You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg Warning: loading /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o will taint the kernel: no license /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o: init_module: No such device /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o failed Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters. You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg Warning: loading
Re: new kernel, new problems
Simon Tod wrote: Surely I don't need to do make modules and make modules_install when I'm not compiling a kernel, just installing a pre-built one 2.4.20-686 (and the corresponding kernel-pcmcia-modules file)!? The output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* gives me the lengthy output in the attached file. How does this help? Can you verify this module is actually here?: /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: new kernel, new problems
So why can't modprobe find any of the modules - if indeed that's the problem - cause they're certainly where they're supposed to be. Looking through the output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* again suggests to me that it's some sort of dependency or configuration problem... the same comment appears again and again in the output Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters. What's that all about?! --- Russell Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Tod wrote: Surely I don't need to do make modules and make modules_install when I'm not compiling a kernel, just installing a pre-built one 2.4.20-686 (and the corresponding kernel-pcmcia-modules file)!? The output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* gives me the lengthy output in the attached file. How does this help? Can you verify this module is actually here?: /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] = --- Simon Tod [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: new kernel, new problems
Simon Tod wrote: So why can't modprobe find any of the modules - if indeed that's the problem - cause they're certainly where they're supposed to be. Looking through the output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* again suggests to me that it's some sort of dependency or configuration problem... the same comment appears again and again in the output Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters. What's that all about?! --- Russell Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Tod wrote: Surely I don't need to do make modules and make modules_install when I'm not compiling a kernel, just installing a pre-built one 2.4.20-686 (and the corresponding kernel-pcmcia-modules file)!? The output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* gives me the lengthy output in the attached file. How does this help? Can you verify this module is actually here?: /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpi.o What does uname -a show? Don't top-post. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: new kernel, new problems
Thanks. Got the cpu speed bit solved.
Looking through the PCMCIA HowTo I've checked to see
that /etc/pcmica/config, /etc/default/pcmcia and
/etc/init.d/pcmica are the same under both kernels.
My new kernel is missing the line
serial_cs 4384 0 (unused)
from lsmod.
Under the kernel 2.4.20-686 the output of
/proc/devices is
Character devices:
1 mem
2 pty/m%d
3 pty/s%d
4 tts/%d
5 cua/%d
7 vcs
10 misc
13 input
14 sound
29 fb
128 ptm
136 pts/%d
162 raw
Block devices:
1 ramdisk
3 ide0
while under 2.4.19 it's
Character devices:
1 mem
2 pty
3 ttyp
4 ttyS
5 cua
7 vcs
10 misc
14 sound
29 fb
108 ppp
128 ptm
136 pts
162 raw
180 usb
203 cpu/cpuid
226 drm
254 pcmcia
Block devices:
2 fd
3 ide0
7 loop
43 nbd
There seem to be a whole bunch of devices missing in
the new kernel.
An attempt to start serial_cs with modprobe illicited
the response
/lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/pcmcia/ds.o:
insmod
/lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/pcmcia/ds.o
failed
/lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/pcmcia/ds.o:
insmod serial_cs failed
Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module
parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters.
You may find more information in syslog or the
output from dmesg
while insmod serial_cs gave me
Using
/lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/char/pcmcia/serial_cs.o
/lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/char/pcmcia/serial_cs.o:
unresolved symbol register_pccard_driver_R583d4ed2
/lib/modules/2.4.20-686/kernel/drivers/char/pcmcia/serial_cs.o:
unresolved symbol unregister_pccard_driver_Rdb348cd2
So now I'm stumped. Where do I go from here to get the
pcmcia modem up and running?
--- Narins, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a 1000 Mhz that was originally recognized as
667Mhz
Look for these files
/proc/cpufreq
/proc/sys/cpu/0/{speed|speed-min|speed-max}
if you have those, all you have to do is
cat /proc/sys/cpu/0/speed-max
/proc/sys/cpu/0/speed
check the results with
cat /proc/cpufreq
If you have multiple processors, you should find
them under
/proc/sys/cpu/[0-9]+
by the way, you can also cat speed, speed-min and
speed-max
-Original Message-
From: Simon Tod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 3:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: new kernel, new problems
Having installed kernel-image-2.4.20-686 and
kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.20-686 to rid myself of
a
couple of problems I was having with my old kernel
(2.4.19), I've now picked up a couple of new
problems.
1) A failure to get the pcmcia modem running - I
notice there is a pcmcia entry in /proc/devices
under
the old kernel but not the new one. How can I
track
down the relavent info in the old kernel that I
can
use in the new one to the modem up again?
2) Reading /var/log/dmesg when booting under the
new
kernel, it claims to detect a 700 MHz processor
while
the old kernel gets it right at 1000 MHz. WTF?
Thanks in advance.
=
---
Simon Tod
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
This message is intended only for the personal and
confidential use of the designated recipient(s)
named above. If you are not the intended recipient
of this message you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination, distribution or copying of
this message is strictly prohibited. This
communication is for information purposes only and
should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a
solicitation of an offer to buy any financial
product, an official confirmation of any
transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman
Brothers. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not
represent that this information is complete or
accurate and it should not be relied upon as such.
All information is subject to change without notice.
=
---
Simon Tod
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: new kernel, new problems
Simon Tod wrote: Thanks. Got the cpu speed bit solved. Looking through the PCMCIA HowTo I've checked to see that /etc/pcmica/config, /etc/default/pcmcia and /etc/init.d/pcmica are the same under both kernels. My new kernel is missing the line serial_cs 4384 0 (unused) from lsmod. Try: depmod modprobe -a \* If that fixes the problem, maybe you should add the missing modules to /etc/modules. Did you do make modules, make modules_install when doing the kernel? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
new kernel, new problems
Having installed kernel-image-2.4.20-686 and kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.20-686 to rid myself of a couple of problems I was having with my old kernel (2.4.19), I've now picked up a couple of new problems. 1) A failure to get the pcmcia modem running - I notice there is a pcmcia entry in /proc/devices under the old kernel but not the new one. How can I track down the relavent info in the old kernel that I can use in the new one to the modem up again? 2) Reading /var/log/dmesg when booting under the new kernel, it claims to detect a 700 MHz processor while the old kernel gets it right at 1000 MHz. WTF? Thanks in advance. = --- Simon Tod [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: new kernel, new problems
I have a 1000 Mhz that was originally recognized as 667Mhz
Look for these files
/proc/cpufreq
/proc/sys/cpu/0/{speed|speed-min|speed-max}
if you have those, all you have to do is
cat /proc/sys/cpu/0/speed-max /proc/sys/cpu/0/speed
check the results with
cat /proc/cpufreq
If you have multiple processors, you should find them under
/proc/sys/cpu/[0-9]+
by the way, you can also cat speed, speed-min and speed-max
-Original Message-
From: Simon Tod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 3:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: new kernel, new problems
Having installed kernel-image-2.4.20-686 and
kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.20-686 to rid myself of a
couple of problems I was having with my old kernel
(2.4.19), I've now picked up a couple of new problems.
1) A failure to get the pcmcia modem running - I
notice there is a pcmcia entry in /proc/devices under
the old kernel but not the new one. How can I track
down the relavent info in the old kernel that I can
use in the new one to the modem up again?
2) Reading /var/log/dmesg when booting under the new
kernel, it claims to detect a 700 MHz processor while
the old kernel gets it right at 1000 MHz. WTF?
Thanks in advance.
=
---
Simon Tod
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated
recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you
are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
message is strictly prohibited. This communication is for information purposes only
and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy
any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official
statement of Lehman Brothers. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or
error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or
accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to
change without notice.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
