nmh bug (was: Re: exmh - presort inc sometimes fails)

1999-01-07 Thread Mark Phillips

 Thanks for this, I have scanned the messages you included as well as
 my own, looking for similarities/differences.  I think I may have discovered
 a common theme.  It would seem that all the errant messages were sent using
 the mailer Mutt.
 
 My sample size it still too small to be conclusive on this point, but
 it is a lead.  What could lead to an incorporation failure however is
 still beyond me.
 
 What I need to do now is get more detailed debugging info from exmh.
 At the moment all the log really tells me is:
 
   exmh-bg {Inc_Presort +MyIncTmp: {child killed: segmentation violation}}
 
 Does anyone know how to get more debugging info from exmh?


I have just managed to reproduce the error at the commandline using
the inc command (nmh).  I have sent off a message to the nmh-workers
telling them about the bug.

Cheers,

Mark.



_/\___/~~\
/~~\_/~~\__/~~\__Mark_Phillips
/~~\_/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/~~\HE___/~~\__/~~\APTAIN_
/~~\__/~~\
__
They told me I was gullible ... and I believed them! 




Re: nmh bug (was: Re: exmh - presort inc sometimes fails)

1999-01-07 Thread Jutta Wrage
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mark Phillips
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I have just managed to reproduce the error at the commandline using
the inc command (nmh).  I have sent off a message to the nmh-workers
telling them about the bug.

It's nmh? I tried to use nmh, too, when upgrading to hamm. But then
there was no address in the to:-field, when I replied to a message.
So I changed back to mh.

cu

Jutta