x11amp, lsof kernels

1999-02-07 Thread Daniel J. Brosemer
I recently made the upgrade (a few hours ago) to kernel 2.2.1 from 2.0.34
and really like it!  I have only two questions that I would be grateful if
someone more knowledgable could answer.

1.  x11amp (v 0.9) used to take about 13% CPU according to top... now it's
sitting steadfast at 35.3%  Is it really taking more processor, or is this
due to some kernel option I might have chosen?  Should I recompile x11amp
under kernel 2.2.1?

2.  lsof won't do anything anymore (not that I expected it to).  Are there
any new binaries for kernel 2.2.1 in .deb form, or should I compile my
own, if so, where can I get either .debs or source?

Thanks in advance.
-Dan


... Any resemblance between the above views and those of my employer,
my terminal, or the view out my window are purely coincidental.  Any
resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.  The
question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them
is left as an exercise for the reader.  The question of the existence of
the reader is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient.  (A
discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the scope
of this message.)


Re: x11amp, lsof kernels

1999-02-07 Thread Christopher R. Barry
Daniel J. Brosemer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

[...]

 1.  x11amp (v 0.9) used to take about 13% CPU according to top... now it's
 sitting steadfast at 35.3%  Is it really taking more processor, or is this
 due to some kernel option I might have chosen?

I'm also noticing that things seem slightly more sluggish when sound
is playing than before. Some applications launch faster though and
memory and swap are freed much better now. All in all I guess the
2.2.1 kernel is worth it

Christopher