Re: xemacs und emacs
Am Sonntag, 25. Mai 2003 20:04 schrieb Kai Großjohann: Ich weiß leider nicht genau, wie das entsprechende XEmacs-Feature heißt, aber das gibt es im XEmacs natürlich auch. Du kannst den XEmacs-Teil entsprechend behandeln. werd mich da mal schlau machen ... Eine andere Möglichkeit wäre, den Kram aus ~/.emacs rauszuschmeißen und eine ~/.emacs für Emacs und eine ~/.xemacs/init.el für XEmacs zu warten. Dann hast du keine Probleme mit Kompatibilität, musst Änderungen aber evtl. doppelt machen. Ja, so hab ich's gemacht, schien mir am einfachsten zu sein, vielen Dank. Weiß jemand, ob man den (X)Emacs auch auf Deutsch umstellen kann ? Gruß, Simon -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
xemacs and emacs
Hi all, Installing from a Debian 1.3.1 CD: 1. I'd like to make both xemacs and emacs available on my system, but dselect prohibits both. Why? Should not there be an automatic way for coexistence? 2. Also, I'd like to make bbdb and auctex available to xemacs, but using dselect doesn't permit this? What's the right automatic way to give xemacs bbdb and auctex support? Thanks, John -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Xemacs vs. Emacs
Hello, I remember seeing some messages in this list not long ago saying that the maintainers of these two packages had agreed on a format that would allow both to coexist in the same machine. What's the status of this? I'd like to try Xemacs but I don't want to give up my old friend Emacs! -- Pedro I. Sanchez -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Re: Xemacs vs. Emacs
Hello, I remember seeing some messages in this list not long ago saying that the maintainers of these two packages had agreed on a format that would allow both to coexist in the same machine. What's the status of this? It works. The XEmacs19 package and Emacs package from unstable (what will be Debian 2.0) coexist perfectly fine. Until this morning I did have both of them installed. If you want to try XEmacs, I'd suggest grabbing that installation However, XEmacs19 as it currently stands in unstable doesn't work with the XFree86 3.3 binaries also in unstable. So if you use dselect to install it via FTP, make certain that you do -not- upgrade your X packages. XEmacs19 works fine with XFree86 3.2. I'll probably reinstall XEmacs19 when the onflict between it and X is resolved. I'd like to try Xemacs but I don't want to give up my old friend Emacs! XEmacs is just like Emacs, but a bit prettier, with a few new features, and only slightly slower. -- Pedro I. Sanchez -- Buddha Buck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just as the strength of the Internet is chaos, so the strength of our liberty depends upon the chaos and cacaphony of the unfettered speech the First Amendment protects. -- A.L.A. v. U.S. Dept. of Justice -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Re: xemacs and emacs
Jean == Jean Pierre LeJacq [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jean I have both working fine on my system which is based on the Jean unstable branch. Didn't have to do anything special. Jean On Mon, 7 Apr 1997, Steve Hsieh wrote: Can someone explain why the xemacs and emacs packages can't coexist on the same Debian system? (What would it take to make them coexist?) I have the emacs package (i.e. GNU emacs) installed. If I try to select the xemacs package with dselect, I am told that there is a dependency conflict and I must remove emacs, w3, vm and several other packages to install xemacs. At least at the level of Debian packages they still appear to conflict.
Re: xemacs and emacs
Steve Hsieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can someone explain why the xemacs and emacs packages can't coexist on the same Debian system? (What would it take to make them coexist?) I have both on my computer at home. All that I know is that there are some conflict in some few auxiliary binaries like /usr/bin/etags. (There was such a question few months ago.) Both packages provide them. Such binaries does not have the same syntax and their usage may be quite different. Someone mentioned on /etc/alternative. I do not know this well but I think this could be used to resolve the conflicts. For sure some package would loss a few of its functionality. Other idea: split emacs package in emacs and emacs-utils. In emacs-utils you put all these conflicting binaries. Do the same for xemacs and install only one of emacs-utils and xemacs-utils. We could have something like: emacs depends emacsutl emacs suggests emacs-utils xemacs depends emacsutl xemacs suggests xemacs-utils emacs-utils provides emacsutl xemacs-utils provides emacsutl emacs-utils conflicts xemacs-utils (would it be necessary to explicit?) Another idea: (feasible?) move the conflicting binaries of xemacs to some internal directory (like we have with movemail, hexl) and configure the specific variables in site-start if these is a problem. Perhaps renaming some bins like etags to xetags could be done. -- Alair Pereira do Lago [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ime.usp.br/~alair Computer Science Department -- Universidade de S~ao Paulo -- Brazil
Re: xemacs and emacs
The maintainers of these two packages reached an agreement on how to make possible to install both without any conflicts. They uploaded corrected versions to master.debian.org/Incoming but for some reason they were not transferred to Bo. I downloaded these two packages from Incoming and installed them without problems. Ramos. -- Debian GNU/Linux 1.2 - Kernel 2.1.29 - http://www.debian.org Jose' RAMOS Goncalves [EMAIL PROTECTED] Department of Physics - University of Reading - England - U.K.
Re: xemacs and emacs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The maintainers of these two packages reached an agreement on how to make possible to install both without any conflicts. They uploaded corrected versions to master.debian.org/Incoming but for some reason they were not transferred to Bo. I downloaded these two packages from Incoming and installed them without problems. It would be very nice if these packages reachs frozen. It is annoying that dselect reclaims both are conflicting every time I update my system. -- Alair Pereira do Lago [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ime.usp.br/~alair Computer Science Department -- Universidade de S~ao Paulo -- Brazil
xemacs and emacs
Can someone explain why the xemacs and emacs packages can't coexist on the same Debian system? (What would it take to make them coexist?)
Re: xemacs and emacs
Steve Hsieh writes: Can someone explain why the xemacs and emacs packages can't coexist on the same Debian system? (What would it take to make them coexist?) I was thinking of this lately. I also was wondering whey they don't use update-alternatives - like the three vi clones do. Both provide similar functionality so imho they should use this mechanism. Regards Joey -- / Martin Schulze * Debian GNU/Linux Developer * [EMAIL PROTECTED] / / http://www.debian.org/ http://home.pages.de/~joey/
Re: xemacs and emacs
I have both working fine on my system which is based on the unstable branch. Didn't have to do anything special. -- Jean Pierre On Mon, 7 Apr 1997, Steve Hsieh wrote: Can someone explain why the xemacs and emacs packages can't coexist on the same Debian system? (What would it take to make them coexist?)
