Re: xemacs20 wd buffer too small??
Sen Nagata wrote: i no longer have this problem. a kind soul on #debian helped diagnose the problem. in my case, xemacs was trying to use libc5 libraries -- the fix was to change the order of directories in /etc/ld.so.conf -- /usr/X11R6/lib came after two libc5-compat directories, so i put it before them. (is this recommended?) xemacs was able to find the appropriate libc6 versions of libraries (verified w/ ldd), and things seem to be working fine now. I've checked this out, but in my /etc/ld.so.conf libc5-compat comes after all other libs. I think XEmacs is able to find the right libs: vampira:[bin] # ldd xemacs libXaw.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXaw.so.6 (0x4000f000) libXpm.so.4 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4 (0x40047000) libcompface.so.1 = /usr/lib/libcompface.so.1 (0x40055000) libjpeg.so.6a = /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.6a (0x4006) libpng.so.0 = /usr/lib/libpng.so.0 (0x4007f000) libXmu.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXmu.so.6 (0x4009a000) libXt.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x400ac000) libSM.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x400f4000) libICE.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x400fd000) libXext.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x40112000) libX11.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x4011e000) libncurses.so.3.4 = /lib/libncurses.so.3.4 (0x401c1000) libgdbm.so.1 = /usr/lib/libgdbm.so.1 (0x40206000) libdb.so.1 = /usr/lib/libdb.so.1 (0x4020c000) libm.so.6 = /lib/libm.so.6 (0x4021b000) libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40235000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000) libc.so.5 = /lib/libc.so.5 (0x402d7000) libz.so.1 = /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x40395000) Please mail if this is wrong. Thanks, jenne -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Re: xemacs20 wd buffer too small??
Sorry for my last xemacs20 mail. It was my mistake. jenne -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Re: xemacs20 wd buffer too small??
at some point around Mon, 02 Feb 1998 13:05:23 +0100 Jens Christian Lisner [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned: I've upgraded XEmacs from 19 to 20. When I try to start it, it returns XEmacs: `getwd' failed: errno 0 The point is that it can only be started from root directory. I've read in getwd(3), that this can happen if the buffer is too small. What can I do? i no longer have this problem. a kind soul on #debian helped diagnose the problem. in my case, xemacs was trying to use libc5 libraries -- the fix was to change the order of directories in /etc/ld.so.conf -- /usr/X11R6/lib came after two libc5-compat directories, so i put it before them. (is this recommended?) xemacs was able to find the appropriate libc6 versions of libraries (verified w/ ldd), and things seem to be working fine now. -sen -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Re: xemacs20 wd buffer too small??
at some point around Mon, 02 Feb 1998 13:05:23 +0100 Jens Christian Lisner [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned: I've upgraded XEmacs from 19 to 20. When I try to start it, it returns XEmacs: `getwd' failed: errno 0 The point is that it can only be started from root directory. I've read in getwd(3), that this can happen if the buffer is too small. What can I do? i did a fresh xemacs 20 installation and got the same error. did i miss a response to the quoted message that gives a fix? -sen -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
xemacs20 wd buffer too small??
I've upgraded XEmacs from 19 to 20. When I try to start it, it returns XEmacs: `getwd' failed: errno 0 The point is that it can only be started from root directory. I've read in getwd(3), that this can happen if the buffer is too small. What can I do? jenne -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
