[Declude.JunkMail] Exclude BABEXT Notify for COM
I am getting a lot of postmaster rejects from bad addresses after turning on BANEXT for COM attachments. I would like to exclude notifications on my BANnotify.EML file. Can I do this by inserting SKIPIFBANEXTNAMEHAS COM at the top of EML file? I am just guessing based on feature to use SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS VIRUS_NAME. I am still sitting on 1.82 waiting until comfortable with upgrade. I have looked for the Declude Manuals on the site but see no reference other than the install manual? I got to tell you guys the Declude site is a real pain in the rear finding the manuals. I logged on to my account which is no use. It does not have either of my 2 licenses listed. Nor does it have any links to the manual. I even downloaded the most recent release version and I see no readme.txt or manual there either. Ohh well... any assistance on the BANEXT COM and excluding the notify for same on EML file would be most appreciated. Thanks. -Don --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Exclude BABEXT Notify for COM
There seems to be a bug in all versions where a bogus COM file is still bounced as a banned extension (unlike other 'bogus' types that are detected). The workaround is to add SKIPIFEXT COM to the top of your bannotify.eml, however this will stop all bounces for COM files regardless of whether or not they are found to be 'bogus'. Matt Don Schreiner wrote: I am getting a lot of postmaster rejects from bad addresses after turning on BANEXT for COM attachments. I would like to exclude notifications on my BANnotify.EML file. Can I do this by inserting SKIPIFBANEXTNAMEHAS COM at the top of EML file? I am just guessing based on feature to use SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS VIRUS_NAME. I am still sitting on 1.82 waiting until comfortable with upgrade. I have looked for the Declude Manuals on the site but see no reference other than the install manual? I got to tell you guys the Declude site is a real pain in the rear finding the manuals. I logged on to my account which is no use. It does not have either of my 2 licenses listed. Nor does it have any links to the manual. I even downloaded the most recent release version and I see no readme.txt or manual there either. Ohh well... any assistance on the BANEXT COM and excluding the notify for same on EML file would be most appreciated. Thanks. -Don --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. -- = MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro. http://www.mailpure.com/software/ = --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] COPYFILE
I had to make a sizable kludge to make COPYFILE work the way that I wanted to due to the lack of the Declude headers. I've requested that this be addressed in future releases and it is nice to see that I am not alone even if my own use for this is unique. It's almost valueless to have the message and not know what it failed as would otherwise be shown in the headers inserted by Declude. Matt Markus Gufler wrote: Using the action COPYFILE, the copied D file does not have the Declude Headers. Can this be changed? This would be very usefull. The COPYFILE action can be used to watch a small range below the hold weight to watch what's going on there and maybe adapt something in the weighting system. It also allows introducing new filters or make different tests and hold a copy of affected messages for further analysis and decision if a certain new "thing" is working good enough to being introduced in the weighting system. In both cases it would be usefull to have all declude resulsts in the headers as it significantly simplyfies the analysis work. Markus --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. -- = MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro. http://www.mailpure.com/software/ =
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Exclude BABEXT Notify for COM
Don, The manuals are on the web site. Select Tech Support at the top of the page and you will be taken to links for the manuals. As for the bogus COM file issue, we understand that this is a problem and are looking into ways to resolve it. David Franco-Rocha - Original Message - From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 7:48 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Exclude BABEXT Notify for COM I am getting a lot of postmaster rejects from bad addresses after turning on BANEXT for COM attachments. I would like to exclude notifications on my BANnotify.EML file. Can I do this by inserting SKIPIFBANEXTNAMEHAS COM at the top of EML file? I am just guessing based on feature to use SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS VIRUS_NAME. I am still sitting on 1.82 waiting until comfortable with upgrade. I have looked for the Declude Manuals on the site but see no reference other than the install manual? I got to tell you guys the Declude site is a real pain in the rear finding the manuals. I logged on to my account which is no use. It does not have either of my 2 licenses listed. Nor does it have any links to the manual. I even downloaded the most recent release version and I see no readme.txt or manual there either. Ohh well... any assistance on the BANEXT COM and excluding the notify for same on EML file would be most appreciated. Thanks. -Don --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Exclude BABEXT Notify for COM
Matt, This will work for the meantime and thank you very much! -Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 8:17 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Exclude BABEXT Notify for COM There seems to be a bug in all versions where a bogus COM file is still bounced as a banned extension (unlike other 'bogus' types that are detected). The workaround is to add SKIPIFEXT COM to the top of your bannotify.eml, however this will stop all bounces for COM files regardless of whether or not they are found to be 'bogus'. Matt Don Schreiner wrote: I am getting a lot of postmaster rejects from bad addresses after turning on BANEXT for COM attachments. I would like to exclude notifications on my BANnotify.EML file. Can I do this by inserting SKIPIFBANEXTNAMEHAS COM at the top of EML file? I am just guessing based on feature to use SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS VIRUS_NAME. I am still sitting on 1.82 waiting until comfortable with upgrade. I have looked for the Declude Manuals on the site but see no reference other than the install manual? I got to tell you guys the Declude site is a real pain in the rear finding the manuals. I logged on to my account which is no use. It does not have either of my 2 licenses listed. Nor does it have any links to the manual. I even downloaded the most recent release version and I see no readme.txt or manual there either. Ohh well... any assistance on the BANEXT COM and excluding the notify for same on EML file would be most appreciated. Thanks. -Don --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. -- = MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro. http://www.mailpure.com/software/ = --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. -- CompBiz.Net scanned for Virus' --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Exclude BABEXT Notify for COM
Matt, I would like to clarify one issue: Are you saying that the specific issue is that notifications are erroneously being sent for bogus COM files and that the issue is *not* whether bogus COM files are being accurately detected? David Franco-Rocha - Original Message - From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 8:16 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Exclude BABEXT Notify for COM There seems to be a bug in all versions where a bogus COM file is still bounced as a banned extension (unlike other 'bogus' types that are detected). The workaround is to add SKIPIFEXT COM to the top of your bannotify.eml, however this will stop all bounces for COM files regardless of whether or not they are found to be 'bogus'. Matt Don Schreiner wrote: I am getting a lot of postmaster rejects from bad addresses after turning on BANEXT for COM attachments. I would like to exclude notifications on my BANnotify.EML file. Can I do this by inserting SKIPIFBANEXTNAMEHAS COM at the top of EML file? I am just guessing based on feature to use SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS VIRUS_NAME. I am still sitting on 1.82 waiting until comfortable with upgrade. I have looked for the Declude Manuals on the site but see no reference other than the install manual? I got to tell you guys the Declude site is a real pain in the rear finding the manuals. I logged on to my account which is no use. It does not have either of my 2 licenses listed. Nor does it have any links to the manual. I even downloaded the most recent release version and I see no readme.txt or manual there either. Ohh well... any assistance on the BANEXT COM and excluding the notify for same on EML file would be most appreciated. Thanks. -Don --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. -- = MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro. http://www.mailpure.com/software/ = --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Exclude BABEXT Notify for COM
David, I posted some log snippets last week on the Declude Virus list that show what is happening. Yes, the notifications are being sent in error. These COM files are being detected by Declude Virus as "Bogus", and the proper behavior is for the bogus identification to override the banned extension, and disable the sending of the banname.eml file. This is how other bogus files are handled. Essentially bogus file detection should work exactly the same as vulnerabilities and disable such notifications. What is happening currently that has exposed this flaw is one active zombie spammer is randomizing the name of an image attachment using a forged E-mail address, most of which end with COM. Declude sees a COM extension but finds a GIF in the BASE64 code, which is not a COM file and therefore bogus. Due to the volume and the fact that these are tripping the banname.eml file, there is a huge volume of postmaster bounces from undeliverable E-mail (I got over 200 in just 12 hours before applying the workaround). Log Snippet === 03/16/2005 00:00:31 Qbd6eb1a701040a54 MIME file: [text/html][quoted-printable; Length=5395 Checksum=490002] 03/16/2005 00:00:31 Qbd6eb1a701040a54 MIME file: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [base64; Length=6414 Checksum=850887] 03/16/2005 00:00:31 Qbd6eb1a701040a54 Banning file with COM extension [image/gif]. 03/16/2005 00:00:31 Qbd6eb1a701040a54 Found a bogus .com file 03/16/2005 00:00:31 Qbd6eb1a701040a54 Scanned: Banned file extension. [Prescan OK][MIME: 3 12614] 03/16/2005 00:00:31 Qbd6eb1a701040a54 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/16/2005 00:00:31 Qbd6eb1a701040a54 Subject: denigrate cosmetic scene serge midshipman MIME Snippet === --=_NextPart_000_00QP_00N2764VQ_00Y.154D01N0 Content-Type: image/gif; name="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matt David Franco-Rocha wrote: Matt, I would like to clarify one issue: Are you saying that the specific issue is that notifications are erroneously being sent for bogus COM files and that the issue is *not* whether bogus COM files are being accurately detected? David Franco-Rocha - Original Message - From: "Matt" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 8:16 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Exclude BABEXT Notify for COM There seems to be a bug in all versions where a bogus COM file is still bounced as a banned extension (unlike other 'bogus' types that are detected). The workaround is to add "SKIPIFEXT COM" to the top of your bannotify.eml, however this will stop all bounces for COM files regardless of whether or not they are found to be 'bogus'. Matt Don Schreiner wrote: I am getting a lot of postmaster rejects from bad addresses after turning on BANEXT for COM attachments. I would like to exclude notifications on my BANnotify.EML file. Can I do this by inserting SKIPIFBANEXTNAMEHAS COM at the top of EML file? I am just guessing based on feature to use SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS VIRUS_NAME. I am still sitting on 1.82 waiting until comfortable with upgrade. I have looked for the Declude Manuals on the site but see no reference other than the install manual? I got to tell you guys the Declude site is a real pain in the rear finding the manuals. I logged on to my account which is no use. It does not have either of my 2 licenses listed. Nor does it have any links to the manual. I even downloaded the most recent release version and I see no readme.txt or manual there either. Ohh well... any assistance on the BANEXT COM and excluding the notify for same on EML file would be most appreciated. Thanks. -Don --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. -- = MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro. http://www.mailpure.com/software/ = --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance question
On Monday, March 21, 2005, 11:00:49 AM, Chase wrote: snip/ CS Looking at our test list (posted bellow), we likely have WAY too CS many dns blacklists. That will be the first thing I look at. Any CS other suggestions? I have had luck running a DNS server (resolver - bind) locally on the IMail box using the loopback address for the primary DNS (127.0.0.1) to speed things up. YMMV Also, take a look at this data to see which tests are performing best and perhaps weed out some of the others: http://www.sortmonster.com/MDLP/MDLP-Example-Long.html Hope this helps, _M --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance question
I need some help tuning Declude for performance. Up until now, I have been adding tests mainly for spam filtering effectiveness. But I notice now that the server can process about7 messages per second with the spam filtering off, versus only about 1-1.5 messages per second with Declude turned on.I suspect the delays are mostly network IO bound; the processors and ram on the boxes are relatively idle. When Declude is disabled, the CPU is pinned between iMail and come custom database insertion services we have. We do about 200,000 inbound messages a day between two servers, so the speed issue really only comes up when mail has queued up for some reason and needs to be de-queued. Looking at our test list (posted bellow), we likely have WAY too many dns blacklists. That will be the first thing I look at. Any other suggestions? I don't think it's any one test, but this is what we have turned on: AHBLWARNBLITZEDALLWARNCBLWARNDSBLWARNORDBWARNSBLWARNSORBS-HTTPWARNSORBS-SOCKSWARNSORBS-MISCWARNSORBS-SMTPWARNSORBS-SPAMWARNSORBS-WEBWARNSORBS-BLOCKWARNSORBS-ZOMBIEWARNSORBS-DUHLWARNSPAMCOPWARN DSNWARNNOABUSEWARNNOPOSTMASTERWARN BADHEADERSWARNBASE64WARNCMDSPACEWARNCOMMENTSWARNHELOBOGUSWARNIPNOTINMXIGNOREMAILFROM WARNNOLEGITCONTENTIGNOREPERCENTWARNREVDNSWARNROUTINGWARNSPAMHEADERSWARN FIVETENSRCWARNspamhausWARNdsblWARNnjablWARNreynoldsWARNOridWARNJammWARNAHBLWARNsorbsWARNdnsbl-1WARNdnsbl-2WARNsurrielWARN SNIFFERWARNINV-URIBLWARN IMAILSTAT WARN -Chase Chase Seibert| Network and Systems Engineer | Bullhorn Inc. | 617.464.2440 x119 | www.bullhorn.com
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance question
On Monday, March 21, 2005, 11:00:49 AM, Chase wrote: CS I need some help tuning Declude for performance. Up until One other thought (pushed send too fast). You may have a test or two in there that is not responding --- causing things to time out and slow things down. If you can find it and drop it things should speed up quite a bit. _M --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance question
I don' have UCEPROTECRDO, XBL-DYNA, BLKLST-SURBL andHELOISIP. Can you post your definitions for those? Can I get them off the declude website somehow (I couldn't find them)? -Chase Chase Seibert| Network and Systems Engineer | Bullhorn Inc | 617.464.2440 x119 | www.bullhorn.com -Original Message-From:Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Chase Seibert";Sent: Mar 21, 2005 11:16:28 AMSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance questionOn Monday, March 21, 2005, 11:00:49 AM, Chase wrote: CS Looking at our test list (posted bellow), we likely have WAY too CS many dns blacklists. That will be the first thing I look at. Any CS other suggestions? I have had luck running a DNS server (resolver - bind) locally on the IMail box using the loopback address for the primary DNS (127.0.0.1) to speed things up. YMMV Also, take a look at this data to see which tests are performing best and perhaps weed out some of the others: http://www.sortmonster.com/MDLP/MDLP-Example-Long.html Hope this helps, _M --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance question
Any recommendations for Declude add-ins or log readers that might be able to detect the run times of various tests? If I set logging to high would it log runtimes? -Chase Chase Seibert| Network and Systems Engineer | Bullhorn Inc. | 617.464.2440 x119 | www.bullhorn.com -Original Message-From:Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Chase Seibert";Sent: Mar 21, 2005 11:28:50 AMSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance questionOn Monday, March 21, 2005, 11:00:49 AM, Chase wrote: CS I need some help tuning Declude for performance. Up until One other thought (pushed send too fast). You may have a test or two in there that is not responding --- causing things to time out and slow things down. If you can find it and drop it things should speed up quite a bit. _M --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance question
The test definitions might be more helpful than the Test actions... I see AHBL is listed twice. DSbl is listed twice.Sorbs is listed as are many of the SORBS individual tests. Possible overlap. You list CBL/Blitzedall/SBL and Spamhaus listed. Potential overlap here. Reynolds is a now pay service I believe. If you aren't paying maybe that is an issue. - Original Message - From: Chase Seibert To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 10:00 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance question I need some help tuning Declude for performance. Up until now, I have been adding tests mainly for spam filtering effectiveness. But I notice now that the server can process about7 messages per second with the spam filtering off, versus only about 1-1.5 messages per second with Declude turned on.I suspect the delays are mostly network IO bound; the processors and ram on the boxes are relatively idle. When Declude is disabled, the CPU is pinned between iMail and come custom database insertion services we have. We do about 200,000 inbound messages a day between two servers, so the speed issue really only comes up when mail has queued up for some reason and needs to be de-queued. Looking at our test list (posted bellow), we likely have WAY too many dns blacklists. That will be the first thing I look at. Any other suggestions? I don't think it's any one test, but this is what we have turned on: AHBLWARNBLITZEDALLWARNCBLWARNDSBLWARNORDBWARNSBLWARNSORBS-HTTPWARNSORBS-SOCKSWARNSORBS-MISCWARNSORBS-SMTPWARNSORBS-SPAMWARNSORBS-WEBWARNSORBS-BLOCKWARNSORBS-ZOMBIEWARNSORBS-DUHLWARNSPAMCOPWARN DSNWARNNOABUSEWARNNOPOSTMASTERWARN BADHEADERSWARNBASE64WARNCMDSPACEWARNCOMMENTSWARNHELOBOGUSWARNIPNOTINMXIGNOREMAILFROM WARNNOLEGITCONTENTIGNOREPERCENTWARNREVDNSWARNROUTINGWARNSPAMHEADERSWARN FIVETENSRCWARNspamhausWARNdsblWARNnjablWARNreynoldsWARNOridWARNJammWARNAHBLWARNsorbsWARNdnsbl-1WARNdnsbl-2WARNsurrielWARN SNIFFERWARNINV-URIBLWARN IMAILSTAT WARN -Chase Chase Seibert| Network and Systems Engineer | Bullhorn Inc. | 617.464.2440 x119 | www.bullhorn.com
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance question
Turned out to be that one of our two DNS servers was down; causing a timeout on many of the requests. That's fixed, and Declude is now performing at about 3-4 messages per second. Much better, and not that far off the throughput with zero spam filtering. -Chase Chase Seibert| Network and Systems Engineer | Bullhorn Inc | 617.464.2440 x119 | www.bullhorn.com -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Declude.JunkMail@declude.com";Sent: Mar 21, 2005 11:32:33 AMSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance question Any recommendations for Declude add-ins or log readers that might be able to detect the run times of various tests? If I set logging to high would it log runtimes? -Chase Chase Seibert| Network and Systems Engineer | Bullhorn Inc | 617.464.2440 x119 | www.bullhorn.com -Original Message-From:Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Chase Seibert" ;Sent: Mar 21, 2005 11:28:50 AMSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance questionOn Monday, March 21, 2005, 11:00:49 AM, Chase wrote: CS I need some help tuning Declude for performance. Up until One other thought (pushed send too fast). You may have a test or two in there that is not responding --- causing things to time out and slow things down. If you can find it and drop it things should speed up quite a bit. _M --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance question
XBL is = CBL Blitzed all UCE is probably your dnsbl-1 dnsbl-2 HELOISIP is an external test to see if the HELo is an IP address. Seehttp://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg17819.html Blklst-surbl might be duplicating the invuribl test you are running. - Original Message - From: Chase Seibert To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 10:29 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance question I don' have UCEPROTECRDO, XBL-DYNA, BLKLST-SURBL andHELOISIP. Can you post your definitions for those? Can I get them off the declude website somehow (I couldn't find them)? -Chase Chase Seibert| Network and Systems Engineer | Bullhorn Inc | 617.464.2440 x119 | www.bullhorn.com -Original Message-From:Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Chase Seibert";Sent: Mar 21, 2005 11:16:28 AMSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance questionOn Monday, March 21, 2005, 11:00:49 AM, Chase wrote: CS Looking at our test list (posted bellow), we likely have WAY too CS many dns blacklists. That will be the first thing I look at. Any CS other suggestions? I have had luck running a DNS server (resolver - bind) locally on the IMail box using the loopback address for the primary DNS (127.0.0.1) to speed things up. YMMV Also, take a look at this data to see which tests are performing best and perhaps weed out some of the others: http://www.sortmonster.com/MDLP/MDLP-Example-Long.html Hope this helps, _M --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance question
Test runtimes aren't listed in logging level HIGH. They might be in debug mode, but I wouldn't run that for long. - Original Message - From: Chase Seibert To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 10:30 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance question Any recommendations for Declude add-ins or log readers that might be able to detect the run times of various tests? If I set logging to high would it log runtimes? -Chase Chase Seibert| Network and Systems Engineer | Bullhorn Inc. | 617.464.2440 x119 | www.bullhorn.com -Original Message-From:Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Chase Seibert";Sent: Mar 21, 2005 11:28:50 AMSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance questionOn Monday, March 21, 2005, 11:00:49 AM, Chase wrote: CS I need some help tuning Declude for performance. Up until One other thought (pushed send too fast). You may have a test or two in there that is not responding --- causing things to time out and slow things down. If you can find it and drop it things should speed up quite a bit. _M --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance question
On Monday, March 21, 2005, 11:29:09 AM, Chase wrote: CS I don' have UCEPROTECRDO, XBL-DYNA, BLKLST-SURBL CS and HELOISIP. Can you post your definitions for those? Can I get CS them off the declude website somehow (I couldn't find them)? UCEPROTECRDOip4rdnsbl-1.uceprotect.net 127.0.0.2 30 0 UCEPROTECCMUL ip4rdnsbl-2.uceprotect.net 127.0.0.2 32 0 UCEPROTECCVIR ip4rdnsbl-3.uceprotect.net 127.0.0.2 30 0 I didn't find the others. _M --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance question
Here is an idea many of us use: Configure DNS service on the Imail server for caching only. Point Imail/Declude to use the DNS on the same server. Configure the DNS service to use your other DNS servers and forwarders. You will see a slight performance boost. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase Seibert Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 8:46 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance question Turned out to be that one of our two DNS servers was down; causing a timeout on many of the requests. That's fixed, and Declude is now performing at about 3-4 messages per second. Much better, and not that far off the throughput with zero spam filtering. -Chase Chase Seibert| Network and Systems Engineer | Bullhorn Inc | 617.464.2440 x119 | www.bullhorn.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com; Sent: Mar 21, 2005 11:32:33 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance question Any recommendations for Declude add-ins or log readers that might be able to detect the run times of various tests? If I set logging to high would it log runtimes? -Chase Chase Seibert| Network and Systems Engineer | Bullhorn Inc | 617.464.2440 x119 | www.bullhorn.com -Original Message- From:Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Chase Seibert ; Sent: Mar 21, 2005 11:28:50 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance question On Monday, March 21, 2005, 11:00:49 AM, Chase wrote: CS I need some help tuning Declude for performance. Up until One other thought (pushed send too fast). You may have a test or two in there that is not responding --- causing things to time out and slow things down. If you can find it and drop it things should speed up quite a bit. _M --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude performance question
Chase Seibert wrote: I don' have UCEPROTECRDO, XBL-DYNA, BLKLST-SURBL and HELOISIP. Can you post your definitions for those? Can I get them off the declude website somehow (I couldn't find them)? I wrote the HELOISIP test. It's not a DNS test. Rather, it will tell you if the HELO or REVDNS of the incoming message has an embedded IP address. While not 100%, this is often an indicator of a spam message from a dynamic IP address. You can download it from http://bud.thedurlands.com Hope this helps -- I don't need anger management; I need people to stop making me angry Bud Durland, CNE Mold-Rite Plastics Network Administrator http://www.mrpcap.com --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus / Sophos AV] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] filter files
Is there any mail in specific you are trying to target? - Original Message - From: Joe Raykiewicz To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 2:43 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] filter files I am currently thinking about using a filter file to filter out some unwanted messages. Does anyone have some sample filter files that I could use as a starting point? I sure would appreciate some help getting started on this. Joe
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] filter files
Joe here is a very basic filter but hopefully will help get you started: SKIPIFWEIGHT 16 MINWEIGHTTOFAIL 3 MAXWEIGHT 12 #Subject SUBJECT 3 CONTAINS Online Pharmacy #Words BODY 5 CONTAINS Meds BODY 2 CONTAINS cheap Perscriptions BODY 2 CONTAINS No prescription required BODY 2 CONTAINS No Doctor Visits #Medication BODY 2 CONTAINS codiene BODY 2 CONTAINS Codeine BODY 2 CONTAINS vicodin BODY 2 CONTAINS viagra BODY 2 CONTAINS Cialis #URBL BODY 12 CONTAINS fopq.org BODY 12 CONTAINS awayhowbad.com BODY 12 CONTAINS royalmeds.info BODY 12 CONTAINS uncompromisingmind.com BODY 12 CONTAINS simply-meds.com BODY 12 CONTAINS ritheworldofall.com BODY 12 CONTAINS medberthgood.com #Spam Indicators BODY 12 CONTAINS Cia|is BODY 12 CONTAINS Cialls Here are some good links too: http://www.mailpure.com/software/decludefilters/ http://it.farmprogress.com/declude/declude.htm http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=100 David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Raykiewicz Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 3:44 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] filter files I am currently thinking about using a filter file to filter out some unwanted messages. Does anyone have some sample filter files that I could use as a starting point? I sure would appreciate some help getting started on this. Joe __ NOD32 1.1030 (20050319) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.nod32.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client
We sent a bulk mailing this morning for a client to 532 addresses. We use Group Mail and authenticate from our office dedicated IP to our IMAIL server via the clients account virtual domain. However, the e-mail was rejected to any AOL address stating that URLs are improperly formatted. We have verified all formatting of the URL's. Below is what we get back from AOL. Body of message generated response: 554-: (HVU:NR) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554hvunr.html 554 TRANSACTION FAILED Below is the URL of the actual e-mail/file itself we sent. The only thing I can think of is they do not like the sub-domain we are using news.holisticmoms.org which is what we directed for the plain text folks. The actual e-mail itself can be viewed at http://news.holisticmoms.org/index_email.htm. Also, perhaps they do not like our dedicated office IP number even though we are sending via our IMail server and authenticated via their virtual domain account. Does anyone have any clues about this or the errors of my ways? Thanks. -Don Also, below is the undeliverable return header they provided: Received: from holisticmoms.org [68.209.181.166] by holisticmoms.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id AB3337EB002A; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:25:07 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: HMN Members [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Holistic Moms Network From: Holistic Moms News [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Holistic Moms Network News March 2005 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:23:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_8310132123562132359893 X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [68.209.181.166] X-Declude-Spoolname: Dcb3237eb002a698e.SMD X-Note: CompBiz scanned with Declude JunkMail X-Spam-Tests-Failed: None [-5] Organization: Abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client
I've never seen this problem before. There are certainly a lot or URLs in that message. Do you know somebody with an AOL address that you can use as a test subject? Do a binary search, and cut the message in half. Send the message and repeat until you've succeeded in sending the message, in which case you've isolated which part of the message as the offending URL. If you don't have a friendly AOL account to try, perhaps you could just send the message to their support email address. I took a brief look at the source; maybe it's this URL: a href=http://www.bradleybirth.com%20; target=_blankwww.bradleybirth.com/a Note the %20 to indicate an unnecessary space at the end of the the URL. AOL may be seeing this as an attempt to obfuscate the URL. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Schreiner Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 2:30 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client We sent a bulk mailing this morning for a client to 532 addresses. We use Group Mail and authenticate from our office dedicated IP to our IMAIL server via the clients account virtual domain. However, the e-mail was rejected to any AOL address stating that URLs are improperly formatted. We have verified all formatting of the URL's. Below is what we get back from AOL. Body of message generated response: 554-: (HVU:NR) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554hvunr.html 554 TRANSACTION FAILED Below is the URL of the actual e-mail/file itself we sent. The only thing I can think of is they do not like the sub-domain we are using news.holisticmoms.org which is what we directed for the plain text folks. The actual e-mail itself can be viewed at http://news.holisticmoms.org/index_email.htm. Also, perhaps they do not like our dedicated office IP number even though we are sending via our IMail server and authenticated via their virtual domain account. Does anyone have any clues about this or the errors of my ways? Thanks. -Don Also, below is the undeliverable return header they provided: Received: from holisticmoms.org [68.209.181.166] by holisticmoms.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id AB3337EB002A; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:25:07 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: HMN Members [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Holistic Moms Network From: Holistic Moms News [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Holistic Moms Network News March 2005 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:23:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_8310132123562132359893 X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [68.209.181.166] X-Declude-Spoolname: Dcb3237eb002a698e.SMD X-Note: CompBiz scanned with Declude JunkMail X-Spam-Tests-Failed: None [-5] Organization: Abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client
Check your left-hand nav...you have some bad links there... Darin. - Original Message - From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 5:29 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client We sent a bulk mailing this morning for a client to 532 addresses. We use Group Mail and authenticate from our office dedicated IP to our IMAIL server via the clients account virtual domain. However, the e-mail was rejected to any AOL address stating that URLs are improperly formatted. We have verified all formatting of the URL's. Below is what we get back from AOL. Body of message generated response: 554-: (HVU:NR) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554hvunr.html 554 TRANSACTION FAILED Below is the URL of the actual e-mail/file itself we sent. The only thing I can think of is they do not like the sub-domain we are using news.holisticmoms.org which is what we directed for the plain text folks. The actual e-mail itself can be viewed at http://news.holisticmoms.org/index_email.htm. Also, perhaps they do not like our dedicated office IP number even though we are sending via our IMail server and authenticated via their virtual domain account. Does anyone have any clues about this or the errors of my ways? Thanks. -Don Also, below is the undeliverable return header they provided: Received: from holisticmoms.org [68.209.181.166] by holisticmoms.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id AB3337EB002A; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:25:07 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: HMN Members [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Holistic Moms Network From: Holistic Moms News [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Holistic Moms Network News March 2005 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:23:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_8310132123562132359893 X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [68.209.181.166] X-Declude-Spoolname: Dcb3237eb002a698e.SMD X-Note: CompBiz scanned with Declude JunkMail X-Spam-Tests-Failed: None [-5] Organization: Abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client
Darin/Andrew, I do not know anyone or have an AOL account to test. Anyone have one by chance? I checked left NAV and all links look valid, however I am a little suspect of the Bee Well Therapy Advertiser link with no www and going to change. Where did you see a bad link in the left NAV? Also the link Andrew found with the space I am going to look at changing. Thanks guys for looking! -Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 5:43 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client Check your left-hand nav...you have some bad links there... Darin. - Original Message - From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 5:29 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client We sent a bulk mailing this morning for a client to 532 addresses. We use Group Mail and authenticate from our office dedicated IP to our IMAIL server via the clients account virtual domain. However, the e-mail was rejected to any AOL address stating that URLs are improperly formatted. We have verified all formatting of the URL's. Below is what we get back from AOL. Body of message generated response: 554-: (HVU:NR) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554hvunr.html 554 TRANSACTION FAILED Below is the URL of the actual e-mail/file itself we sent. The only thing I can think of is they do not like the sub-domain we are using news.holisticmoms.org which is what we directed for the plain text folks. The actual e-mail itself can be viewed at http://news.holisticmoms.org/index_email.htm. Also, perhaps they do not like our dedicated office IP number even though we are sending via our IMail server and authenticated via their virtual domain account. Does anyone have any clues about this or the errors of my ways? Thanks. -Don Also, below is the undeliverable return header they provided: Received: from holisticmoms.org [68.209.181.166] by holisticmoms.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id AB3337EB002A; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:25:07 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: HMN Members [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Holistic Moms Network From: Holistic Moms News [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Holistic Moms Network News March 2005 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:23:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_8310132123562132359893 X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [68.209.181.166] X-Declude-Spoolname: Dcb3237eb002a698e.SMD X-Note: CompBiz scanned with Declude JunkMail X-Spam-Tests-Failed: None [-5] Organization: Abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. -- CompBiz.Net scanned for Virus' --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client
Look at the About HMN link, for example... http://www.holisticmoms.org/index.cfm/about See what I mean? There are three links like this in the nav that AOL is complaining about since they don't end with the filename...the path keeps going. Darin. - Original Message - From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 6:15 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client Darin/Andrew, I do not know anyone or have an AOL account to test. Anyone have one by chance? I checked left NAV and all links look valid, however I am a little suspect of the Bee Well Therapy Advertiser link with no www and going to change. Where did you see a bad link in the left NAV? Also the link Andrew found with the space I am going to look at changing. Thanks guys for looking! -Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 5:43 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client Check your left-hand nav...you have some bad links there... Darin. - Original Message - From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 5:29 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client We sent a bulk mailing this morning for a client to 532 addresses. We use Group Mail and authenticate from our office dedicated IP to our IMAIL server via the clients account virtual domain. However, the e-mail was rejected to any AOL address stating that URLs are improperly formatted. We have verified all formatting of the URL's. Below is what we get back from AOL. Body of message generated response: 554-: (HVU:NR) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554hvunr.html 554 TRANSACTION FAILED Below is the URL of the actual e-mail/file itself we sent. The only thing I can think of is they do not like the sub-domain we are using news.holisticmoms.org which is what we directed for the plain text folks. The actual e-mail itself can be viewed at http://news.holisticmoms.org/index_email.htm. Also, perhaps they do not like our dedicated office IP number even though we are sending via our IMail server and authenticated via their virtual domain account. Does anyone have any clues about this or the errors of my ways? Thanks. -Don Also, below is the undeliverable return header they provided: Received: from holisticmoms.org [68.209.181.166] by holisticmoms.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id AB3337EB002A; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:25:07 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: HMN Members [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Holistic Moms Network From: Holistic Moms News [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Holistic Moms Network News March 2005 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:23:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_8310132123562132359893 X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [68.209.181.166] X-Declude-Spoolname: Dcb3237eb002a698e.SMD X-Note: CompBiz scanned with Declude JunkMail X-Spam-Tests-Failed: None [-5] Organization: Abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. -- CompBiz.Net scanned for Virus' --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client
Darin, Got it now. The link is valid to the directory not ending with the index file which is as follows for example: http://www.holisticmoms.org/index.cfm/about but you are saying AOL wants to see full path... http://www.holisticmoms.org/index.cfm/about/index.cfm. Will let you know if it works. Thanks. -Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 6:22 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client Look at the About HMN link, for example... http://www.holisticmoms.org/index.cfm/about See what I mean? There are three links like this in the nav that AOL is complaining about since they don't end with the filename...the path keeps going. Darin. - Original Message - From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 6:15 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client Darin/Andrew, I do not know anyone or have an AOL account to test. Anyone have one by chance? I checked left NAV and all links look valid, however I am a little suspect of the Bee Well Therapy Advertiser link with no www and going to change. Where did you see a bad link in the left NAV? Also the link Andrew found with the space I am going to look at changing. Thanks guys for looking! -Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 5:43 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client Check your left-hand nav...you have some bad links there... Darin. - Original Message - From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 5:29 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client We sent a bulk mailing this morning for a client to 532 addresses. We use Group Mail and authenticate from our office dedicated IP to our IMAIL server via the clients account virtual domain. However, the e-mail was rejected to any AOL address stating that URLs are improperly formatted. We have verified all formatting of the URL's. Below is what we get back from AOL. Body of message generated response: 554-: (HVU:NR) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554hvunr.html 554 TRANSACTION FAILED Below is the URL of the actual e-mail/file itself we sent. The only thing I can think of is they do not like the sub-domain we are using news.holisticmoms.org which is what we directed for the plain text folks. The actual e-mail itself can be viewed at http://news.holisticmoms.org/index_email.htm. Also, perhaps they do not like our dedicated office IP number even though we are sending via our IMail server and authenticated via their virtual domain account. Does anyone have any clues about this or the errors of my ways? Thanks. -Don Also, below is the undeliverable return header they provided: Received: from holisticmoms.org [68.209.181.166] by holisticmoms.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id AB3337EB002A; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:25:07 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: HMN Members [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Holistic Moms Network From: Holistic Moms News [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Holistic Moms Network News March 2005 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:23:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_8310132123562132359893 X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [68.209.181.166] X-Declude-Spoolname: Dcb3237eb002a698e.SMD X-Note: CompBiz scanned with Declude JunkMail X-Spam-Tests-Failed: None [-5] Organization: Abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. -- CompBiz.Net scanned for Virus' --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. -- CompBiz.Net scanned for Virus' --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client
Or shouldn't it at least have a / at then end indicated end of path? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Schreiner Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 3:33 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client Darin, Got it now. The link is valid to the directory not ending with the index file which is as follows for example: http://www.holisticmoms.org/index.cfm/about but you are saying AOL wants to see full path... http://www.holisticmoms.org/index.cfm/about/index.cfm. Will let you know if it works. Thanks. -Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 6:22 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client Look at the About HMN link, for example... http://www.holisticmoms.org/index.cfm/about See what I mean? There are three links like this in the nav that AOL is complaining about since they don't end with the filename...the path keeps going. Darin. - Original Message - From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 6:15 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client Darin/Andrew, I do not know anyone or have an AOL account to test. Anyone have one by chance? I checked left NAV and all links look valid, however I am a little suspect of the Bee Well Therapy Advertiser link with no www and going to change. Where did you see a bad link in the left NAV? Also the link Andrew found with the space I am going to look at changing. Thanks guys for looking! -Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 5:43 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client Check your left-hand nav...you have some bad links there... Darin. - Original Message - From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 5:29 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client We sent a bulk mailing this morning for a client to 532 addresses. We use Group Mail and authenticate from our office dedicated IP to our IMAIL server via the clients account virtual domain. However, the e-mail was rejected to any AOL address stating that URLs are improperly formatted. We have verified all formatting of the URL's. Below is what we get back from AOL. Body of message generated response: 554-: (HVU:NR) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554hvunr.html 554 TRANSACTION FAILED Below is the URL of the actual e-mail/file itself we sent. The only thing I can think of is they do not like the sub-domain we are using news.holisticmoms.org which is what we directed for the plain text folks. The actual e-mail itself can be viewed at http://news.holisticmoms.org/index_email.htm. Also, perhaps they do not like our dedicated office IP number even though we are sending via our IMail server and authenticated via their virtual domain account. Does anyone have any clues about this or the errors of my ways? Thanks. -Don Also, below is the undeliverable return header they provided: Received: from holisticmoms.org [68.209.181.166] by holisticmoms.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id AB3337EB002A; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:25:07 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: HMN Members [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Holistic Moms Network From: Holistic Moms News [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Holistic Moms Network News March 2005 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:23:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_8310132123562132359893 X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [68.209.181.166] X-Declude-Spoolname: Dcb3237eb002a698e.SMD X-Note: CompBiz scanned with Declude JunkMail X-Spam-Tests-Failed: None [-5] Organization: Abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. -- CompBiz.Net scanned for Virus' --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client
Nope...I'm saying it should either end at http://www.holisticmoms.org/index.cfm Or be reparsed as something like http://www.holisticmoms.org/index.cfm?about Basically there shouldn't be any more to the path after index.cfm. Darin. - Original Message - From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 6:33 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client Darin, Got it now. The link is valid to the directory not ending with the index file which is as follows for example: http://www.holisticmoms.org/index.cfm/about but you are saying AOL wants to see full path... http://www.holisticmoms.org/index.cfm/about/index.cfm. Will let you know if it works. Thanks. -Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 6:22 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client Look at the About HMN link, for example... http://www.holisticmoms.org/index.cfm/about See what I mean? There are three links like this in the nav that AOL is complaining about since they don't end with the filename...the path keeps going. Darin. - Original Message - From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 6:15 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client Darin/Andrew, I do not know anyone or have an AOL account to test. Anyone have one by chance? I checked left NAV and all links look valid, however I am a little suspect of the Bee Well Therapy Advertiser link with no www and going to change. Where did you see a bad link in the left NAV? Also the link Andrew found with the space I am going to look at changing. Thanks guys for looking! -Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 5:43 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client Check your left-hand nav...you have some bad links there... Darin. - Original Message - From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 5:29 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client We sent a bulk mailing this morning for a client to 532 addresses. We use Group Mail and authenticate from our office dedicated IP to our IMAIL server via the clients account virtual domain. However, the e-mail was rejected to any AOL address stating that URLs are improperly formatted. We have verified all formatting of the URL's. Below is what we get back from AOL. Body of message generated response: 554-: (HVU:NR) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554hvunr.html 554 TRANSACTION FAILED Below is the URL of the actual e-mail/file itself we sent. The only thing I can think of is they do not like the sub-domain we are using news.holisticmoms.org which is what we directed for the plain text folks. The actual e-mail itself can be viewed at http://news.holisticmoms.org/index_email.htm. Also, perhaps they do not like our dedicated office IP number even though we are sending via our IMail server and authenticated via their virtual domain account. Does anyone have any clues about this or the errors of my ways? Thanks. -Don Also, below is the undeliverable return header they provided: Received: from holisticmoms.org [68.209.181.166] by holisticmoms.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id AB3337EB002A; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:25:07 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: HMN Members [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Holistic Moms Network From: Holistic Moms News [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Holistic Moms Network News March 2005 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:23:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_8310132123562132359893 X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [68.209.181.166] X-Declude-Spoolname: Dcb3237eb002a698e.SMD X-Note: CompBiz scanned with Declude JunkMail X-Spam-Tests-Failed: None [-5] Organization: Abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. -- CompBiz.Net scanned for Virus' --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client
What Don is doing is something thats been around for quite a while, and not just in ColdFusion. In CF its commonly called a FakeURL and the intent of it is to make a url search engine safe by removing the ?'s and 's and replacing them with slashes. Its been around for years. I've never heard of anything like what AOL is doing. If they're serious about blacklisting this sort of thing then it would break zillions of web sites, or more accurately any email pointing to them. -- --mattRobertson-- Janitor, MSB Web Systems mysecretbase.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client
Darin, The entire problem here is the page is dynamically generated via CF and database and the correct page will not come up any other way, only the home page of the site. This code has been in use about 6 years this way and would be a major deal to change all. Found an AOL test subject and going to try Johns suggestion on ending with /. Let you know what happens. -Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 6:47 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client Nope...I'm saying it should either end at http://www.holisticmoms.org/index.cfm Or be reparsed as something like http://www.holisticmoms.org/index.cfm?about Basically there shouldn't be any more to the path after index.cfm. Darin. - Original Message - From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 6:33 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client Darin, Got it now. The link is valid to the directory not ending with the index file which is as follows for example: http://www.holisticmoms.org/index.cfm/about but you are saying AOL wants to see full path... http://www.holisticmoms.org/index.cfm/about/index.cfm. Will let you know if it works. Thanks. -Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 6:22 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client Look at the About HMN link, for example... http://www.holisticmoms.org/index.cfm/about See what I mean? There are three links like this in the nav that AOL is complaining about since they don't end with the filename...the path keeps going. Darin. - Original Message - From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 6:15 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client Darin/Andrew, I do not know anyone or have an AOL account to test. Anyone have one by chance? I checked left NAV and all links look valid, however I am a little suspect of the Bee Well Therapy Advertiser link with no www and going to change. Where did you see a bad link in the left NAV? Also the link Andrew found with the space I am going to look at changing. Thanks guys for looking! -Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 5:43 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client Check your left-hand nav...you have some bad links there... Darin. - Original Message - From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 5:29 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client We sent a bulk mailing this morning for a client to 532 addresses. We use Group Mail and authenticate from our office dedicated IP to our IMAIL server via the clients account virtual domain. However, the e-mail was rejected to any AOL address stating that URLs are improperly formatted. We have verified all formatting of the URL's. Below is what we get back from AOL. Body of message generated response: 554-: (HVU:NR) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554hvunr.html 554 TRANSACTION FAILED Below is the URL of the actual e-mail/file itself we sent. The only thing I can think of is they do not like the sub-domain we are using news.holisticmoms.org which is what we directed for the plain text folks. The actual e-mail itself can be viewed at http://news.holisticmoms.org/index_email.htm. Also, perhaps they do not like our dedicated office IP number even though we are sending via our IMail server and authenticated via their virtual domain account. Does anyone have any clues about this or the errors of my ways? Thanks. -Don Also, below is the undeliverable return header they provided: Received: from holisticmoms.org [68.209.181.166] by holisticmoms.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id AB3337EB002A; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:25:07 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: HMN Members [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Holistic Moms Network From: Holistic Moms News [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Holistic Moms Network News March 2005 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:23:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_8310132123562132359893 X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [68.209.181.166] X-Declude-Spoolname: Dcb3237eb002a698e.SMD X-Note: CompBiz scanned with Declude JunkMail X-Spam-Tests-Failed: None [-5] Organization: Abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL
[Declude.JunkMail] OT: on nuisance messages
To anybody that cares, I just added http://si20.com/auth?uid= to my custom JunkMail Pro filter file which contains identifying strings for Challenge/Response and other nuisance messages. I'm sorry if this message is considered too far off topic. Andrew. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 2:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Colbeck, Andrew Subject: Re: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client Colbeck, Andrew, This is Joseph Trimboli, System Administrator, Cyberlink, Inc. I am running Spam Interceptor to get rid of junk email. Please follow this link to verify that the message you sent me isn't junk email. http://si20.com/auth?uid=2600mid=144sid=AColbeck%40Bentall.com Your email was intercepted because it got a spam rating of 2.4 and I set Spam Interceptor to ask everyone who sends me a message rated over 2 to authenticate. When you authenticate I'll receive your email and you'll never have to authenticate for me again, no matter what spam rating your emails get. Thanks, Joseph Trimboli, System Administrator, Cyberlink, Inc ___ For more information on Spam Interceptor go to http://si20.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] filter files
Thanks to both of you. I am looking to get mostly obscene stuff, but the medical stuff would be very good to catch also. I will start with this and then adventure out on my own:D On a side note has anyone used Message Sniffer, and would it help with this type of stuff or am i looking in the wrong direction? Thanks again, Joe -- Original Message -- From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:04:55 -0500 Joe here is a very basic filter but hopefully will help get you started: SKIPIFWEIGHT 16 MINWEIGHTTOFAIL 3 MAXWEIGHT 12 #Subject SUBJECT 3 CONTAINS Online Pharmacy #Words BODY 5 CONTAINS Meds BODY 2 CONTAINS cheap Perscriptions BODY 2 CONTAINS No prescription required BODY 2 CONTAINS No Doctor Visits #Medication BODY 2 CONTAINS codiene BODY 2 CONTAINS Codeine BODY 2 CONTAINS vicodin BODY 2 CONTAINS viagra BODY 2 CONTAINS Cialis #URBL BODY 12 CONTAINS fopq.org BODY 12 CONTAINS awayhowbad.com BODY 12 CONTAINS royalmeds.info BODY 12 CONTAINS uncompromisingmind.com BODY 12 CONTAINS simply-meds.com BODY 12 CONTAINS ritheworldofall.com BODY 12 CONTAINS medberthgood.com #Spam Indicators BODY 12 CONTAINS Cia|is BODY 12 CONTAINS Cialls Here are some good links too: http://www.mailpure.com/software/decludefilters/ http://it.farmprogress.com/declude/declude.htm http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=100 David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Raykiewicz Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 3:44 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] filter files I am currently thinking about using a filter file to filter out some unwanted messages. Does anyone have some sample filter files that I could use as a starting point? I sure would appreciate some help getting started on this. Joe __ NOD32 1.1030 (20050319) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.nod32.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. ___ Webmail delivered by Microlandcomputers.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client
Matt/Darin/John/Andrew, Inserting the trailing / on the URLs ending with a directory - did the trick and passed the AOL filter. I learned something again today. Thanks for your help! This list is the best! -Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Robertson Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 6:59 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a Client What Don is doing is something thats been around for quite a while, and not just in ColdFusion. In CF its commonly called a FakeURL and the intent of it is to make a url search engine safe by removing the ?'s and 's and replacing them with slashes. Its been around for years. I've never heard of anything like what AOL is doing. If they're serious about blacklisting this sort of thing then it would break zillions of web sites, or more accurately any email pointing to them. -- --mattRobertson-- Janitor, MSB Web Systems mysecretbase.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. -- CompBiz.Net scanned for Virus' --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Reverse DNS and 554 Denied
While the AOL filter is fixed, I am now getting 554 Denied on some servers (see below). I am also getting unsolicited bulk mail undeliverable. I am using Group Mail in our office on dedicated IP authenticating SMTP to their virtual domain on our IMail server. Do I need to make an additional DNS entry of our office IP for their domain and what would I do? Again, the e-mail we are sending is here at http://news.holisticmoms.org/index_email.htm. Body of message generated response: 554 5.7.1 This message appears to be unsolicited bulk mail...reverse DNS problem with 65.57.241.197...Try plain text Original message follows. Received: from holisticmoms.org [68.209.181.166] by holisticmoms.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id A27353BE00EE; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:26:59 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: HMN Members [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Holistic Moms Network From: Holistic Moms News [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Holistic Moms Network News March 2005 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:25:53 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_30681132292922553481 X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [68.209.181.166] X-Declude-Spoolname: D827353be00eedffd.SMD X-Note: CompBiz scanned with Declude JunkMail X-Spam-Tests-Failed: None [-5] Organization: Abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Postmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] Save Address | Headers To : [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC : Date : Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:28:52 -0500 Subject : Undeliverable Mail undeliverable to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Body of message generated response: 554 Denied undeliverable to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Body of message generated response: 554 Denied Original message follows. Received: from holisticmoms.org [68.209.181.166] by holisticmoms.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id A286418D00F0; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:27:18 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: HMN Members [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Holistic Moms Network From: Holistic Moms News [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Holistic Moms Network News March 2005 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:26:00 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_1949814226871226091 X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [68.209.181.166] X-Declude-Spoolname: D8285418d00f0e016.SMD X-Note: CompBiz scanned with Declude JunkMail X-Spam-Tests-Failed: None [-5] Organization: Abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Reverse DNS and 554 Denied
Hi, Don- news.holisticmoms.org reports its IP address as 65.57.241.196 65.57.241.196 reports its name as vacant.compbiz.net. You should have your provider set up a reverse lookup (pointer) record for 65.57.241.196 that points to news.holisticmoms.org instead of vacant.compbiz.net -d - Original Message - From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 10:02 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Reverse DNS and 554 Denied While the AOL filter is fixed, I am now getting 554 Denied on some servers (see below). I am also getting unsolicited bulk mail undeliverable. I am using Group Mail in our office on dedicated IP authenticating SMTP to their virtual domain on our IMail server. Do I need to make an additional DNS entry of our office IP for their domain and what would I do? Again, the e-mail we are sending is here at http://news.holisticmoms.org/index_email.htm. Body of message generated response: 554 5.7.1 This message appears to be unsolicited bulk mail...reverse DNS problem with 65.57.241.197...Try plain text Original message follows. Received: from holisticmoms.org [68.209.181.166] by holisticmoms.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id A27353BE00EE; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:26:59 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: HMN Members [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Holistic Moms Network From: Holistic Moms News [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Holistic Moms Network News March 2005 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:25:53 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_30681132292922553481 X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [68.209.181.166] X-Declude-Spoolname: D827353be00eedffd.SMD X-Note: CompBiz scanned with Declude JunkMail X-Spam-Tests-Failed: None [-5] Organization: Abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Postmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] Save Address | Headers To : [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC : Date : Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:28:52 -0500 Subject : Undeliverable Mail undeliverable to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Body of message generated response: 554 Denied undeliverable to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Body of message generated response: 554 Denied Original message follows. Received: from holisticmoms.org [68.209.181.166] by holisticmoms.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id A286418D00F0; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:27:18 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: HMN Members [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Holistic Moms Network From: Holistic Moms News [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Holistic Moms Network News March 2005 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:26:00 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_1949814226871226091 X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [68.209.181.166] X-Declude-Spoolname: D8285418d00f0e016.SMD X-Note: CompBiz scanned with Declude JunkMail X-Spam-Tests-Failed: None [-5] Organization: Abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.