RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message not scanned

2005-06-02 Thread Dan Horne
Actually, not until after I sent the second time.  It seems that there
was a much bigger problem.  For some reason, Hijack had decided after
several months that now my incoming postfix gateway was trying to relay
through our server and was therefore holding SOME BUT NOT ALL incoming
email.  I was one of those affected, so I wasn't getting any mail.  I
didn't see my first post or your response (the answer, btw, is no such
errors in my event log), so I thought it didn't go and resent.

I still don't know why Hijack decided to flag my gateway and hold its
messages (ALL messages in HOLD2 were verified to be destined for local
users).  I still don't know why it only held SOME messages (around 2500
messages were held out of a total volume of around 10,000 that went
through the gateway yesterday).  I still don't know why these messages
were delivered without being scanned by Declude (unless that is a
feature of Hijack, that it runs before AV or JM and doesn't rescan
re-queued email; and if so it should be changed to at least run after
AV).   I have added an ALLOWIP for my gateway, since I don't want to
turn Hijack off.

BTW, I worked with Ralph Krausse at Declude and with Eric Shanbrom at
Ipswitch and both were extremely helpful in diagnosing this problem.
Thank you both very much.

Dan Horne



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 2:53 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message not scanned

Did you not see my response to your earlier post?

John T
eServices For You


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne
 Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 10:53 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Message not scanned
 
 I have received a couple of messages in the last two days in my inbox 
 that were NOT scanned by Declude.  I thought the headers below were 
 strange, since they seem to have MIME segments in them.  However, 
 another message in my inbox that was spam (below my hold weight) also 
 has similar MIME segments, but was scanned by Declude, evidenced by 
 the Declude headers.  The Declude headers are not present (I add 
 several headers with Declude) in the email below.  The line
X-Virus-Scanned:
 amavisd-new 2.3.0 (20050424) at taisweb.net was added by my gateway 
 postfix box that scans messages with clamav.
 
 When searching the Declude logs, the queue number 9F3B01A60A71 
 does not appear.  Neither does a07e06888a82, though I wouldn't 
 expect it to as that is the forward message, which should appear after

 Declude scans.  Version info: Imail v8.2 HF2, Declude Junkmail 
 Pro/Virus Standard/Hijack v2.0.6.10.
 
 For reference, I have attached a file with the headers of the other 
 spam message I mentioned, so you can see what kind of headers I add 
 that are missing below.
 
 
 IMAIL LOG
 SMTPD (9f3b01a60a71) [172.20.5.2] connect 68.118.154.7 port 60324 
 SMTPD (9f3b01a60a71) [68.118.154.7] EHLO mx2.rmslink.net SMTPD 
 (9f3b01a60a71) [68.118.154.7] MAIL 
 FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 SMTPD (9f3b01a60a71) [68.118.154.7] RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 SMTPD (9f3b01a60a71) [x] looking up taisweb.net in HOSTS SMTPD 
 (9f3b01a60a71) [68.118.154.7] DATA SMTPD (9f3b01a60a71) 
 [68.118.154.7] S:\imail\spool\D9f3b01a60a71.SMD 4808 SMTP 
 () Info - Adding Queue file 
 S:\imail\spool\Q9F3B01A60A71.SMD
 SMTP (9f3b01a60a71) processing 
 S:\imail\spool\Q9F3B01A60A71.SMD
 SMTP (9f3b01a60a71) ldeliver mail.taisweb.net copyall-main (1) 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4808 SMTP (9f3b01a60a71) forwarded

 message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using new file: a07e06888a82 
 SMTP (9f3b01a60a71) finished S:\imail\spool\Q9F3B01A60A71.SMD
 status=1
 
 HEADERS--
 Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
 Received: from mail.taisweb.net ([68.118.153.2]) by ex1.wilcoxent.net 
 with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:48:14 -0400
 Received: from SMTP32-FWD by mail.taisweb.net
   (SMTP32) id A9F3B01A60A71; Wed,  1 Jun 2005 07:48:14
 Received: from mx2.rmslink.net [68.118.154.7] by mail.taisweb.net with

 ESMTP
   (SMTPD-8.20) id AF3C0298; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 07:42:52 -0400
 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
   by mx2.rmslink.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F58139863
   for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed,  1 Jun 2005 07:20:47 -0400 (EDT)
 Received: from gatesalbert.com (81-202-101-107.user.ono.com
 [81.202.101.107])
   by mx2.rmslink.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 46D5B39845
   for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed,  1 Jun 2005 07:20:40 -0400 (EDT)
 From: Feli Ridgeway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Napier Kincaid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Really Works GGood
 Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 06:42:20 -0500
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
   

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Message not scanned

2005-06-02 Thread NIck Hayer




Hi Dan,

Here are some thoughts - 

  
I still don't know why Hijack decided to flag my gateway and hold its
messages (ALL messages in HOLD2 were verified to be destined for local
users). 

Hijack cares about the senders - not the recipients I do believe 



   I still don't know why it only held SOME messages (around 2500
messages were held out of a total volume of around 10,000 that went
through the gateway yesterday).

What do hijack the logs say? [They may explain just what happened. If
not run on high so next time more info may be avail]

Were all the held mail prefaced with the gateway ip? [Just to be sure
they all came from the gateway]

Do you have the line in hijack.cfg "ALLOWIP gateway ip  ?
["An ALLOWIP line will let an IP address send unlimited E-mail"]

Best,

-Nick



I still don't know why these messages
were delivered without being scanned by Declude (unless that is a
"feature" of Hijack, that it runs before AV or JM and doesn't rescan
re-queued email; and if so it should be changed to at least run after
AV).   I have added an ALLOWIP for my gateway, since I don't want to
turn Hijack off.

BTW, I worked with Ralph Krausse at Declude and with Eric Shanbrom at
Ipswitch and both were extremely helpful in diagnosing this problem.
Thank you both very much.

Dan Horne



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 2:53 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message not scanned

Did you not see my response to your earlier post?

John T
eServices For You


  
  
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dan Horne
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 10:53 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Message not scanned

I have received a couple of messages in the last two days in my inbox 
that were NOT scanned by Declude.  I thought the headers below were 
strange, since they seem to have MIME segments in them.  However, 
another message in my inbox that was spam (below my hold weight) also 
has similar MIME segments, but was scanned by Declude, evidenced by 
the Declude headers.  The Declude headers are not present (I add 
several headers with Declude) in the email below.  The line

  
  "X-Virus-Scanned:
  
  
amavisd-new 2.3.0 (20050424) at taisweb.net" was added by my gateway 
postfix box that scans messages with clamav.

When searching the Declude logs, the queue number 9F3B01A60A71 
does not appear.  Neither does a07e06888a82, though I wouldn't 
expect it to as that is the forward message, which should appear after

  
  
  
  
Declude scans.  Version info: Imail v8.2 HF2, Declude Junkmail 
Pro/Virus Standard/Hijack v2.0.6.10.

For reference, I have attached a file with the headers of the other 
spam message I mentioned, so you can see what kind of headers I add 
that are missing below.


IMAIL LOG
SMTPD (9f3b01a60a71) [172.20.5.2] connect 68.118.154.7 port 60324 
SMTPD (9f3b01a60a71) [68.118.154.7] EHLO mx2.rmslink.net SMTPD 
(9f3b01a60a71) [68.118.154.7] MAIL 
FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTPD (9f3b01a60a71) [68.118.154.7] RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
SMTPD (9f3b01a60a71) [x] looking up taisweb.net in HOSTS SMTPD 
(9f3b01a60a71) [68.118.154.7] DATA SMTPD (9f3b01a60a71) 
[68.118.154.7] S:\imail\spool\D9f3b01a60a71.SMD 4808 SMTP 
() Info - Adding Queue file 
S:\imail\spool\Q9F3B01A60A71.SMD
SMTP (9f3b01a60a71) processing 
S:\imail\spool\Q9F3B01A60A71.SMD
SMTP (9f3b01a60a71) ldeliver mail.taisweb.net copyall-main (1) 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 4808 SMTP (9f3b01a60a71) forwarded

  
  
  
  
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using new file: a07e06888a82 
SMTP (9f3b01a60a71) finished S:\imail\spool\Q9F3B01A60A71.SMD
status=1

HEADERS--
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from mail.taisweb.net ([68.118.153.2]) by ex1.wilcoxent.net 
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
	 Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:48:14 -0400
Received: from SMTP32-FWD by mail.taisweb.net
  (SMTP32) id A9F3B01A60A71; Wed,  1 Jun 2005 07:48:14
Received: from mx2.rmslink.net [68.118.154.7] by mail.taisweb.net with

  
  
  
  
ESMTP
  (SMTPD-8.20) id AF3C0298; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 07:42:52 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mx2.rmslink.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F58139863
	for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed,  1 Jun 2005 07:20:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from gatesalbert.com (81-202-101-107.user.ono.com
[81.202.101.107])
	by mx2.rmslink.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 46D5B39845
	for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed,  1 Jun 2005 07:20:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Feli Ridgeway" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Napier Kincaid" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Really Works GGood
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 06:42:20 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	

[Declude.JunkMail] ANOTHER message Declude didn't delete.

2005-06-02 Thread Marc Catuogno
Anyone?  Anyone? Buehler?

Received: from server.tl4s.com [147.202.39.144] by mail.prudentialrand.com
with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-8.05) id A8F42960114; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 09:26:12 -0400
Received: from [212.35.74.41] (port=2257 helo=comp)
by server.tl4s.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.50)
id 1DdpeJ-000128-TP; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 08:22:17 -0500
From: eBay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SPAM]**eBay Summary Confirmation**
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;iso-8859-1
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:22:22 +0300
X-Priority: 3
X-Library: Indy 8.0.25
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with
any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server.tl4s.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - prudentialrand.com
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ebay.com
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-RBL-Warning: SORBS-SPAM: Spam Received See:
http://www.dnsbl.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?147.202.39.144;
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMCOP: Blocked - see
http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?147.202.39.144;
X-RBL-Warning: NOABUSE: Not supporting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMHEADERS: This E-mail has headers consistent with spam
[420f].
X-RBL-Warning: SNIFFER: Message failed SNIFFER: 53.
X-RBL-Warning: SUBJECTFILTER: Message failed SUBJECTFILTER test (line 156,
weight 0)
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Weight of 45 reaches or exceeds the limit of 10.
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT25: Weight of 45 reaches or exceeds the limit of 25.
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT40: Weight of 45 reaches or exceeds the limit of 40.
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [147.202.39.144]
X-Declude-Spoolname: D08f4029601143e0e.SMD
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) for
spam.
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SORBS-SPAM, SPAMCOP, NOABUSE, IPNOTINMX,
NOLEGITCONTENT, SPAMHEADERS, SNIFFER, SUBJECTFILTER, WEIGHT10, WEIGHT15,
WEIGHT20, WEIGHT25, WEIGHT30, WEIGHT40, CATCHALLMAILS [45]
X-Country-Chain: 
X-Note: This E-mail was sent from ns1.tl4s.com ([147.202.39.144]).

Marc Catuogno
MIS Director
Prudential Rand Realty
Office: 845-770-1279
Cell:   914-906-1126


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ANOTHER message Declude didn't delete.

2005-06-02 Thread Brad Morgan
Check your log files to see what config file is being used.  I had a similar
problem because I updated $default$.junkmail but failed to update all of the
per domain / per user .junkmail files, my own in particular!

Regards,

Brad Morgan
IT Manager
Horizon Interactive Inc.


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Copyto

2005-06-02 Thread Kyle Fisher








I am trying to use copyto and copy all mail sent or received
from user. I am receiving all mail to the user but nothing from.



This is what I have in my filter file.



MAILFROM 0 IS [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ALLRECIPS 0 CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Kyle








RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ANOTHER message Declude didn't delete.

2005-06-02 Thread Marc Catuogno
THANK YOU~ there was one person who had the weight 30 'blank' in their
.junkmail file so it skipped the test.

Marc

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Morgan
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 11:04 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ANOTHER message Declude didn't delete.

Check your log files to see what config file is being used.  I had a similar
problem because I updated $default$.junkmail but failed to update all of the
per domain / per user .junkmail files, my own in particular!

Regards,

Brad Morgan
IT Manager
Horizon Interactive Inc.


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]



---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message not scanned

2005-06-02 Thread Dan Horne



"Hijack cares 
about the senders - not the recipients I do believe"

Yes, but Hijack should be OUTGOING only. These emails 
were obviously incoming.

What do hijack the logs 
say?

06/01/2005 08:53:13 QAFB901A60E85 [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not 
local.06/01/2005 08:53:13 QAFB901A60E85 Outgoing from 
68.118.154.7: threshold 2 reached; SPAM: HOLDING 
PERMANENTLY

That is a sample of one of the held emails (loglevel 
high). It clearly says [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not 
local, but that address is set up as an alias on our server (It forwards to 
AOL). The domain burnsandco.com is local and it contains an address of 
pattinelson.

Another:

06/01/2005 08:58:05 QB0DC01820EDC [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not 
local.06/01/2005 08:58:05 QB0DC01820EDC Outgoing from 
68.118.154.7: threshold 2 reached; SPAM: HOLDING 
PERMANENTLY

Again, this one clearly states that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not local but the 
address is set up on our server. This one is not an alias and is not 
forwarded anywhere. The log shows between those two entries (among many 
other "is not local" entries) that several messages coming in from the gateway 
ARE in fact treated as local:06/01/2005 08:56:50 QB09201A00EC7 
Incoming from 68.118.154.7: OK.
and
06/01/2005 08:56:53 QB09501980ECB Incoming from 
68.118.154.7: OK.

Were all the held mail 
prefaced with the gateway ip?

Yes, every single one of nearly 5000..

Do you have the line in 
hijack.cfg "ALLOWIP gateway ip  ?

I do now, but I shouldn't need to. The problem is 
thatHijack somehow started incorrectly identifying local addresses. 
For example if I go back tothe previous day'slog and look I see that 
all emails coming from the gateway for local addresses are correctly identified 
as local addresses and get an OK line. 

05/31/2005 16:27:38 
QC8BA02143290 Incoming from 68.118.154.7: 
OK.05/31/2005 16:27:39 QC8BA020E3292 Incoming from 
68.118.154.7: OK.05/31/2005 16:27:47 QC8C202223294 
Incoming from 68.118.154.7: OK.05/31/2005 16:27:53 
QC8C8021A3296 Incoming from 68.118.154.7: 
OK.05/31/2005 16:28:00 QC8D002143298 Incoming from 
68.118.154.7: OK.05/31/2005 16:28:18 QC8E2020E329A 
Incoming from 68.118.154.7: OK.05/31/2005 16:28:27 
QC8EB0222329C Incoming from 68.118.154.7: 
OK.05/31/2005 16:28:27 QC8EB021A329E Incoming from 
68.118.154.7: OK.05/31/2005 16:28:48 QC900022232A3 
Incoming from 68.118.154.7: OK.05/31/2005 16:28:50 
QC902021A32A5 Incoming from 68.118.154.7: 
OK.05/31/2005 16:29:01 QC90D020E32A8 Incoming from 
68.118.154.7: OK.05/31/2005 16:29:01 QC90D022232AA 
Incoming from 68.118.154.7: OK.05/31/2005 16:29:03 
QC90F021A32AC Incoming from 68.118.154.7: 
OK.05/31/2005 16:29:04 QC910021432AE Incoming from 
68.118.154.7: OK.05/31/2005 16:29:14 QC91A020E32B0 
Incoming from 68.118.154.7: OK.05/31/2005 16:29:19 
QC91F021A32B3 Incoming from 68.118.154.7: 
OK.05/31/2005 16:29:21 QC921021432B5 Incoming from 
68.118.154.7: OK.05/31/2005 16:29:31 QC92B021A32B9 
Incoming from 68.118.154.7: OK.05/31/2005 16:29:31 
QC92B021432BB Incoming from 68.118.154.7: 
OK.05/31/2005 16:29:33 QC92C020E32BD Incoming from 
68.118.154.7: OK.

This 
particular problem did not start until yesterday and ended when I put in the 
ALLOWIP line. Looking through the entire log shows no incorrect 
identifications on that day. This happened suddenly and I don't know why 
(when last we spoke, neither did Declude).


  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NIck 
  HayerSent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 8:51 AMTo: 
  Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Message 
  not scanned
  Hi Dan,Here are some thoughts - 
  I still don't know why Hijack decided to flag my gateway and hold its
messages (ALL messages in HOLD2 were verified to be destined for local
users). Hijack cares about the senders - not the recipients 
  I do believe 
   I still don't know why it only held SOME messages (around 2500
messages were held out of a total volume of around 10,000 that went
through the gateway yesterday).What do hijack the logs 
  say? [They may explain just what happened. If not run on high so next 
  time more info may be avail]Were all the held mail prefaced with the 
  gateway ip? [Just to be sure they all came from the gateway]Do you 
  have the line in hijack.cfg "ALLOWIP gateway ip  ? ["An 
  ALLOWIP line will let an IP address send unlimited 
  E-mail"]Best,-Nick
I still don't know why these messages
were delivered without being scanned by Declude (unless that is a
"feature" of Hijack, that it runs before AV or JM and doesn't rescan
re-queued email; and if so it should be changed to at least run after
AV).   I have added an ALLOWIP for my gateway, since I don't want to
turn Hijack off.

BTW, I worked with Ralph Krausse at Declude and with Eric Shanbrom at
Ipswitch and both were extremely helpful in diagnosing this problem.
Thank you both very much.

Dan Horne



-Original Message-

[Declude.JunkMail] Problem with Whitelist

2005-06-02 Thread Kyle Fisher








I am trying to figure out why this email transaction started
off with the Last Action = "" then went to WHITELIST. My global.cfg has
WHITELIST AUTH and AUTOWHITELIST, but I checked the Imail log and this person
did not AUTH and the recipients are not in this persons webmail address
book. 



Any ideas

Kyle









06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D Subject: FW: Scripture
for Thursday

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] IP:
198.216.117.200 ID: 

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D Tests failed
[weight=-192]: CMDSPACE=WARN IPNOTINMX=IGNORE NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE
IP-WHITELIST=IGNORE CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE 

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D Action(s) taken for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] = IGNORE WARN [LAST ACTION="">

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D L16 Message OK

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D Subject: FW: Scripture
for Thursday

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 198.216.117.200 ID: 

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D Tests failed
[weight=-192]: CMDSPACE=WARN IPNOTINMX=IGNORE NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE
IP-WHITELIST=IGNORE CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE 

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D Action(s) taken for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] = IGNORE WARN [LAST ACTION="">

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D L17 Message OK

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D Subject: FW: Scripture
for Thursday

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 198.216.117.200 ID: 

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D Tests failed
[weight=-192]: CMDSPACE=WARN IPNOTINMX=IGNORE NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE
IP-WHITELIST=IGNORE CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE 

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D Action(s) taken for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] = IGNORE WARN [LAST ACTION="">

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D L18 Message OK

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D Subject: FW: Scripture
for Thursday

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 198.216.117.200
ID: 

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D Tests failed
[weight=-192]: CMDSPACE=WARN IPNOTINMX=IGNORE NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE
IP-WHITELIST=IGNORE CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE 

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D Action(s) taken for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] = IGNORE WARN [LAST ACTION="">

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D Skipping4 E-mail from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ; whitelisted [EMAIL PROTECTED] ].

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D L19 Message OK

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D Subject: FW: Scripture
for Thursday

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP: 198.216.117.200 ID: 

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D Tests failed
[weight=0]: CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE 

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D Action(s) taken for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] = WHITELISTED [LAST ACTION="">

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D L20 Message OK

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D Subject: FW: Scripture
for Thursday

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 198.216.117.200 ID: 

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D Tests failed
[weight=0]: CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE 

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D Action(s) taken for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] = WHITELISTED [LAST ACTION="">

06/02/2005 10:31:45 

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Copyto

2005-06-02 Thread Kyle Fisher








What I found so far is that the user is
using AUTH and I whitelist auth so if the whitelist run before my filter it
probably wont work right?



How could I get this to work?



Kyle











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle Fisher
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005
10:17 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Copyto





I am trying to use copyto and copy all mail sent or received
from user. I am receiving all mail to the user but nothing from.



This is what I have in my filter file.



MAILFROM
0
IS [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ALLRECIPS
0
CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Kyle








Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Copyto

2005-06-02 Thread Darin Cox



Good point. Looks like you would have to turn 
off AUTH for the user, which may be undesirable for other reasons. I don't 
think you can run filters if AUTH is enabled.

You might use an IMail rule instead. I think 
others have used that successfully to hide the copying from the 
user.
Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: Kyle Fisher 
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 

Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 2:28 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Copyto


What I found so far is 
that the user is using AUTH and I whitelist auth so if the whitelist run before 
my filter it probably won’t work right?

How could I get this to 
work?

Kyle





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle FisherSent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 10:17 
AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] 
Copyto

I am trying to use copyto and copy 
all mail sent or received from user. I am receiving all mail to the user 
but nothing from.

This is what I have in my filter 
file.

MAILFROM 
0 
IS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ALLRECIPS 
0 
CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Kyle


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Copyto

2005-06-02 Thread Kyle Fisher








Ok thanks. I am already using the copyall
account for Imail for monitoring a different user, but there might be a way
just to use rules to make it work.



Ill try it.



Thanks

Kyle











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 2:02
PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Copyto







Good point. Looks like you would have to turn off AUTH
for the user, which may be undesirable for other reasons. I don't think
you can run filters if AUTH is enabled.











You might use an IMail rule instead. I think others
have used that successfully to hide the copying from the user.






Darin.

















- Original Message - 



From: Kyle Fisher 





To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com






Sent: Thursday, June 02,
2005 2:28 PM





Subject: RE:
[Declude.JunkMail] Copyto











What I found so far is that the user is
using AUTH and I whitelist auth so if the whitelist run before my filter it
probably wont work right?



How could I get this to work?



Kyle











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kyle Fisher
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005
10:17 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Copyto





I am trying to use copyto and copy all mail sent or received
from user. I am receiving all mail to the user but nothing from.



This is what I have in my filter file.



MAILFROM
0
IS [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ALLRECIPS
0
CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Kyle








Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Copyto

2005-06-02 Thread Darin Cox



There was a discussion in the IMail list about a 
week or so ago about doing this. Ibelieve Eric Shanbrom chimed in at 
one point if that helps you find it in the archive. Domain rules may have 
been mentioned as well.
Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: Kyle Fisher 
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 

Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 3:57 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Copyto


Ok thanks. I am 
already using the copyall account for Imail for monitoring a different user, but 
there might be a way just to use rules to make it 
work.

I’ll try 
it.

Thanks
Kyle





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin CoxSent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 2:02 
PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 
Copyto


Good point. Looks like you 
would have to turn off AUTH for the user, which may be undesirable for other 
reasons. I don't think you can run filters if AUTH is 
enabled.



You might use an IMail rule 
instead. I think others have used that successfully to hide the copying 
from the user.

Darin.





- Original Message - 


From: Kyle Fisher 


To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 


Sent: Thursday, 
June 02, 2005 2:28 PM

Subject: RE: 
[Declude.JunkMail] Copyto


What I found so far is 
that the user is using AUTH and I whitelist auth so if the whitelist run before 
my filter it probably won’t work right?

How could I get this to 
work?

Kyle





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle FisherSent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 10:17 
AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] 
Copyto

I am trying to use copyto and copy 
all mail sent or received from user. I am receiving all mail to the user 
but nothing from.

This is what I have in my filter 
file.

MAILFROM 
0 
IS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ALLRECIPS 
0 
CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Kyle


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Problem with Whitelist

2005-06-02 Thread Marc Catuogno








Got any whitelist anywhere
entries? It looks like it says IP-Whitelist  did it come from a
whitelisted IP address?



-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle Fisher
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 1:47
PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
Problem with Whitelist



I am trying to figure out why this
email transaction started off with the Last Action = "" then went to
WHITELIST. My global.cfg has WHITELIST AUTH and AUTOWHITELIST, but I
checked the Imail log and this person did not AUTH and the recipients are not
in this persons webmail address book. 



Any ideas

Kyle









06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D Subject: FW: Scripture for Thursday

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 198.216.117.200 ID: 

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D Tests failed [weight=-192]: CMDSPACE=WARN IPNOTINMX=IGNORE
NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE IP-WHITELIST=IGNORE CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE 

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D Action(s) taken for [EMAIL PROTECTED] = IGNORE WARN
[LAST ACTION="">

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D L16 Message OK

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D Subject: FW: Scripture for Thursday

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 198.216.117.200 ID: 

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D Tests failed [weight=-192]: CMDSPACE=WARN IPNOTINMX=IGNORE
NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE IP-WHITELIST=IGNORE CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE 

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D Action(s) taken for [EMAIL PROTECTED] = IGNORE WARN
[LAST ACTION="">

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D
L17 Message OK

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D Subject: FW: Scripture for Thursday

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 198.216.117.200
ID: 

06/02/2005 10:31:45 Q265E0149717D
Tests failed [weight=-192]: CMDSPACE=WARN IPNOTINMX=IGNORE
NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE IP-WHITELIST=IGNORE CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE 

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D Action(s) taken for [EMAIL PROTECTED] = IGNORE WARN
[LAST ACTION="">

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D L18 Message OK

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D Subject: FW: Scripture for Thursday

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP: 198.216.117.200 ID: 

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D Tests failed [weight=-192]: CMDSPACE=WARN IPNOTINMX=IGNORE
NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE IP-WHITELIST=IGNORE CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE 

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D Action(s) taken for [EMAIL PROTECTED] = IGNORE WARN
[LAST ACTION="">

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D Skipping4 E-mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;
whitelisted [EMAIL PROTECTED] ].

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D L19 Message OK

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D Subject: FW: Scripture for Thursday

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 198.216.117.200 ID: 

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D Tests failed [weight=0]: CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE 

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D Action(s) taken for [EMAIL PROTECTED] = WHITELISTED [LAST
ACTION="">

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D L20 Message OK

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D Subject: FW: Scripture for Thursday

06/02/2005 10:31:45
Q265E0149717D From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

[Declude.JunkMail] DNS Tests?

2005-06-02 Thread Evans Martin








After
upgrading and implementing the slightly modified global.cfg file that comes
with the latest distribution, my non-local dns related tests dont seem
to be working anymore. Im still tagging spam but Im only seeing
weight being added from the locally performed tests. Is there something that
would break the old non-local tests from working?



Thanks,

Evans
Martin








Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Problem with Whitelist

2005-06-02 Thread Scott Fisher



This line: 06/02/2005 10:31:45 
Q265E0149717D Skipping4 E-mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; 
whitelisted [EMAIL PROTECTED] ].
Represents an address book 
whitelist.

Here's what I think is 
happening...
A message with numerous recipients. 
So Declude runs the tests for each recipient.
Recipients #1 through #4 no 
problem.
Recipient tested #5 has an address 
book whitelist I believe the recipient is[EMAIL PROTECTED]. The email is correctly 
whitelisted.
Recipient #6 (and all subsequent 
recipients) are tested and incorrectly picks up recipient #5's address book 
whitelisting. They are falsely whitelisted.

That's what I read from the 
logs.
If you agree this is the case, I'd 
forward it to the Declude support address as a potential 
bug.


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Marc Catuogno 
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 
  
  Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 9:02 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Problem 
  with Whitelist
  
  
  Got any “whitelist 
  anywhere” entries? It looks like it says IP-Whitelist – did it come from 
  a whitelisted IP address?
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle FisherSent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 1:47 
  PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Problem with 
  Whitelist
  
  I am trying to figure out why this 
  email transaction started off with the Last Action = "" then went to 
  WHITELIST. My global.cfg has WHITELIST AUTH and AUTOWHITELIST, but I 
  checked the Imail log and this person did not AUTH and the recipients are not 
  in this person’s webmail address book. 
  
  Any ideas
  Kyle
  
  
  
  
  06/02/2005 10:31:45 
  Q265E0149717D Subject: FW: Scripture for Thursday
  06/02/2005 10:31:45 
  Q265E0149717D From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 198.216.117.200 ID: 
  06/02/2005 10:31:45 
  Q265E0149717D Tests failed [weight=-192]: CMDSPACE=WARN IPNOTINMX=IGNORE 
  NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE IP-WHITELIST=IGNORE CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE 
  
  06/02/2005 10:31:45 
  Q265E0149717D Action(s) taken for [EMAIL PROTECTED] = IGNORE WARN 
  [LAST ACTION="">
  06/02/2005 10:31:45 
  Q265E0149717D L16 Message OK
  06/02/2005 10:31:45 
  Q265E0149717D Subject: FW: Scripture for Thursday
  06/02/2005 10:31:45 
  Q265E0149717D From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 198.216.117.200 ID: 
  
  06/02/2005 10:31:45 
  Q265E0149717D Tests failed [weight=-192]: CMDSPACE=WARN IPNOTINMX=IGNORE 
  NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE IP-WHITELIST=IGNORE CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE 
  
  06/02/2005 10:31:45 
  Q265E0149717D Action(s) taken for [EMAIL PROTECTED] = IGNORE WARN 
  [LAST ACTION="">
  06/02/2005 10:31:45 
  Q265E0149717D L17 Message OK
  06/02/2005 10:31:45 
  Q265E0149717D Subject: FW: Scripture for Thursday
  06/02/2005 10:31:45 
  Q265E0149717D From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 
  198.216.117.200 ID: 
  06/02/2005 10:31:45 
  Q265E0149717D Tests failed [weight=-192]: CMDSPACE=WARN IPNOTINMX=IGNORE 
  NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE IP-WHITELIST=IGNORE CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE 
  
  06/02/2005 10:31:45 
  Q265E0149717D Action(s) taken for [EMAIL PROTECTED] = IGNORE WARN 
  [LAST ACTION="">
  06/02/2005 10:31:45 
  Q265E0149717D L18 Message OK
  06/02/2005 10:31:45 
  Q265E0149717D Subject: FW: Scripture for Thursday
  06/02/2005 10:31:45 
  Q265E0149717D From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  IP: 198.216.117.200 ID: 
  06/02/2005 10:31:45 
  Q265E0149717D Tests failed [weight=-192]: CMDSPACE=WARN IPNOTINMX=IGNORE 
  NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE IP-WHITELIST=IGNORE CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE 
  
  06/02/2005 10:31:45 
  Q265E0149717D Action(s) taken for [EMAIL PROTECTED] = IGNORE WARN 
  [LAST ACTION="">
  06/02/2005 10:31:45 
  Q265E0149717D Skipping4 E-mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; 
  whitelisted [EMAIL PROTECTED] ].
  06/02/2005