RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS update for the att conglomerate
John, Can you list multiple REVDNS on a single line when using spamdomains? For example @bellsouth.net .bellsouth. isp.att. Thanks, Keith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 10:55 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS update for the att conglomerate Does anyone have an updated listed for SPAMDOMAINS test for the AT T conglomerate? I know there is .att. and bellsouth.com and sbc.com but what else is there that could originate from an att.com REVDNS? John T --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS update for the att conglomerate
You can but I think the limit is three. Don't forget ATT/SBC is in bed with Yahoo so their email can come through Yahoo too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 11:24 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS update for the att conglomerate John, Can you list multiple REVDNS on a single line when using spamdomains? For example @bellsouth.net .bellsouth. isp.att. Thanks, Keith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 10:55 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS update for the att conglomerate Does anyone have an updated listed for SPAMDOMAINS test for the AT T conglomerate? I know there is .att. and bellsouth.com and sbc.com but what else is there that could originate from an att.com REVDNS? John T --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS update for the att conglomerate
The ATT/Yahoo/BellSouth/Ameritech/SBS conglomerate is about to force me to remove all of the entries from the spamdomains file entirely. (Did I leave any one out?) John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 10:46 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS update for the att conglomerate You can but I think the limit is three. Don't forget ATT/SBC is in bed with Yahoo so their email can come through Yahoo too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 11:24 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS update for the att conglomerate John, Can you list multiple REVDNS on a single line when using spamdomains? For example @bellsouth.net.bellsouth. isp.att. Thanks, Keith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 10:55 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS update for the att conglomerate Does anyone have an updated listed for SPAMDOMAINS test for the AT T conglomerate? I know there is .att. and bellsouth.com and sbc.com but what else is there that could originate from an att.com REVDNS? John T --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages
Any news about this David? I tried with the latest interim (4.3.64) with the same result: any WHITELIST disables the CATCHALLMAILS test or any other test and it's defined action. Best, Adolfo Justiniano Santa Cruz BBS e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.scbbs.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 9:53 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages I thought we had added this I will check with our engineers and get back to you. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adolfo Justiniano Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 1:04 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages Hello David, Bad news, as soon as I enable the WHITELIST AUTH the COPYTO action is ignored. Best, Adolfo Justiniano Santa Cruz BBS e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.scbbs.net -Original Message- From: Adolfo Justiniano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 7:27 PM To: 'declude.junkmail@declude.com' Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages Hmmm nice tip David, I'm going to try it and I'll let you know if it works. I'm using actually version 4.3.46 Best, Adolfo Justiniano Santa Cruz BBS e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.scbbs.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 4:04 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages To archive certain addresses you would use per-domain/per-user setting where the .junkmail file or .sender file action is CATCHALLMAILS COPYTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think if you are running the latest version of Declude the CATCHALLMAILS is triggered regardless of the WHITELIST status. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adolfo Justiniano Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 3:46 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages I think that it wouldn't work. First because I just need to archive some addresses not all and second because probably the WHITELIST AUTH if triggered will also ignore any action like the COPYTO. Am I wrong? Adolfo Justiniano Santa Cruz BBS e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.scbbs.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 3:10 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages Have you tried using CATCHALLMAILS catchallmails x x 0 0 David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adolfo Justiniano Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 2:57 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages Thank you David for the suggestion, but it doesn't work in my case. I'll explain what I'm doing: instead of using IMail's copyall function for archival, which BTW is very resource intensive, I use Declude's COPYTO action using a filter that triggers only the accounts that I want to archive their incoming and outgoing mail, so I can't use the WHITELIST AUTH because if I do the COPYTO action is ignored. The BYPASSWHITELIST test will do the same, ignoring the COPYTO action for those messages that are below the weight or number of recipients and I need to archive all the messages of those users that are in the filter. As I'm not using the WHITELIST AUTH I need to counterbalance some weight for those users that are authenticated, thus why I need a test or a filtering option. Thank you for considering adding it, I'm certain that it could be of some use to others as well and a good weapon to be added to Declude's great arsenal. Best, Adolfo Justiniano Santa Cruz BBS e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.scbbs.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 10:14 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages As an FYI this test can be useful if you are concerned that not all users should be whitelisted when authenticated. BYPASSWHITELIST This optional test instructs Declude to bypass any whitelisting for E-mails with at least a specific number of recipients and at least a specific weight. For example, you could define a test with the following line in the global.cfg file: BYPASSWHITELIST bypasswhitelist 60 5 0 0. The 60 refers to the weight the E-mail must
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages
Adolfo, I have it on the to do list for engineering to see which version and if it indeed works correctly. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adolfo Justiniano Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 3:28 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages Any news about this David? I tried with the latest interim (4.3.64) with the same result: any WHITELIST disables the CATCHALLMAILS test or any other test and it's defined action. Best, Adolfo Justiniano Santa Cruz BBS e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.scbbs.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 9:53 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages I thought we had added this I will check with our engineers and get back to you. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adolfo Justiniano Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 1:04 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages Hello David, Bad news, as soon as I enable the WHITELIST AUTH the COPYTO action is ignored. Best, Adolfo Justiniano Santa Cruz BBS e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.scbbs.net -Original Message- From: Adolfo Justiniano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 7:27 PM To: 'declude.junkmail@declude.com' Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages Hmmm nice tip David, I'm going to try it and I'll let you know if it works. I'm using actually version 4.3.46 Best, Adolfo Justiniano Santa Cruz BBS e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.scbbs.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 4:04 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages To archive certain addresses you would use per-domain/per-user setting where the .junkmail file or .sender file action is CATCHALLMAILS COPYTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think if you are running the latest version of Declude the CATCHALLMAILS is triggered regardless of the WHITELIST status. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adolfo Justiniano Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 3:46 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages I think that it wouldn't work. First because I just need to archive some addresses not all and second because probably the WHITELIST AUTH if triggered will also ignore any action like the COPYTO. Am I wrong? Adolfo Justiniano Santa Cruz BBS e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.scbbs.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 3:10 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages Have you tried using CATCHALLMAILS catchallmails x x 0 0 David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adolfo Justiniano Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 2:57 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages Thank you David for the suggestion, but it doesn't work in my case. I'll explain what I'm doing: instead of using IMail's copyall function for archival, which BTW is very resource intensive, I use Declude's COPYTO action using a filter that triggers only the accounts that I want to archive their incoming and outgoing mail, so I can't use the WHITELIST AUTH because if I do the COPYTO action is ignored. The BYPASSWHITELIST test will do the same, ignoring the COPYTO action for those messages that are below the weight or number of recipients and I need to archive all the messages of those users that are in the filter. As I'm not using the WHITELIST AUTH I need to counterbalance some weight for those users that are authenticated, thus why I need a test or a filtering option. Thank you for considering adding it, I'm certain that it could be of some use to others as well and a good weapon to be added to Declude's great arsenal. Best, Adolfo Justiniano Santa Cruz BBS e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.scbbs.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 10:14 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages As an FYI this test can be useful if you are concerned that not all users
[Declude.JunkMail] Test types order
What order do the different test types trigger? What I am trying to do is find emails that Fail both INV-URIBL and ZEROHOUR but it seems that the ZEROHOUR is ran after the filters? Which makes the TESTFAILED variable in this case useless. Is there a way to run zero hour before the filters run? Or to test for the failure of both tests? MINWEIGHTTOFAIL 28 TESTSFAILED 14 CONTAINS ZEROHOUR TESTSFAILED 14 CONTAINS INV-URIBL I have yet to see a legitimate email fail both of these tests! Kevin Bilbee Network Administrator Standard Abrasives, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changing the way industry works. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
