RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains.txt file

2004-04-19 Thread Doug McKee
Me too,
Thanks,
Doug

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 7:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains.txt file


Todd,

Would you mind sending me a copy of the spamdomain.txt file as well? I
would like to see what you have as a starting point.

Thanx



 Goran Jovanovic
 The LAN Shoppe



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
 Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 2:19 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains.txt file

 Jeff,

 I see no one has answered you on this.  Spamdomains is a very
useful
 test and I think you will like the results.  We get an average of 14%
 weekdays and 26% on weekends of our email fail Spamdomains and there
are
 not
 a lot of FPs.

 I will send you a spamdomains file tomorrow.

 Todd Hunter
 Smart Mail


 - Original Message -
 From: Jeff Maze - Hostmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 11:15 AM
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains.txt file


  Anyone?
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Maze -
  Hostmaster
  Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 8:26 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains.txt file
 
  Hello,
  I think I'm going to implement the spam domains tests.  Anyone have
  a file they would like to share that works well for them?
 
 
  ---
  [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
  (http://www.declude.com)]
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe,
  just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
  Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
  http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
 
  ---
  [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 


 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[South Texas Internet scanned this E-mail for viruses using Declude Virus]

---
[South Texas Internet scanned this E-mail for viruses using Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] SMTP processes hanging

2004-01-19 Thread Doug McKee
I am running Imail 6.06. Declude 1.75i2.
Lately I have been having to kill 10-15 smtp32.exe processes about three
times a day to keep the server running.
The processes don't terminate and eventually the server stalls out.
Killing the processes returns functionality.
Is it possible that the newer declude isn't backwards compatible with the
older IMail or is there something else going on?

Thanks,
Doug McKee

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Emails not processed

2003-09-28 Thread Doug McKee

This morning I found about 100 spam held in the spool between 1200 and 0830.
The log shows multiple scans of some of the emails. Other  single-scanned emails were 
also not processed during the period and remain in the spool file. 

09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed NOPOSTMASTER (Not supporting [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]). Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed BADHEADERS (This E-mail was sent from a broken 
mail client [801e].). Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed REVDNS (This E-mail was sent from a MUA/MTA 
2.172.164.106 with no reverse DNS entry.). Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed LONGSUBJ (Subject with at least 60 characters 
found.). Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed SPAMCHK (Message failed SPAMCHK: 176.). 
Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed WEIGHT50 (Weight of 248 reaches or exceeds the 
limit of 50.). Action=DELETE.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed SPAMDOMAINS (). Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed BOGONS (ch 2aca46a ipfile against 100/8 
(nm=ff00).). Action=IGNORE.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed NOPOSTMASTER (Not supporting [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]). Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed BADHEADERS (This E-mail was sent from a broken 
mail client [801e].). Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed REVDNS (This E-mail was sent from a MUA/MTA 
2.172.164.106 with no reverse DNS entry.). Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed LONGSUBJ (Subject with at least 60 characters 
found.). Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed SPAMCHK (Message failed SPAMCHK: 176.). 
Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed WEIGHT50 (Weight of 248 reaches or exceeds the 
limit of 50.). Action=DELETE.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed SPAMDOMAINS (). Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed BOGONS (ch 2aca46a ipfile against 100/8 
(nm=ff00).). Action=IGNORE.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed NOPOSTMASTER (Not supporting [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]). Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed BADHEADERS (This E-mail was sent from a broken 
mail client [801e].). Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed REVDNS (This E-mail was sent from a MUA/MTA 
2.172.164.106 with no reverse DNS entry.). Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed LONGSUBJ (Subject with at least 60 characters 
found.). Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed SPAMCHK (Message failed SPAMCHK: 176.). 
Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed WEIGHT50 (Weight of 248 reaches or exceeds the 
limit of 50.). Action=DELETE.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed SPAMDOMAINS (). Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed BOGONS (ch 2aca46a ipfile against 100/8 
(nm=ff00).). Action=IGNORE.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed NOPOSTMASTER (Not supporting [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]). Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed BADHEADERS (This E-mail was sent from a broken 
mail client [801e].). Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed REVDNS (This E-mail was sent from a MUA/MTA 
2.172.164.106 with no reverse DNS entry.). Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed LONGSUBJ (Subject with at least 60 characters 
found.). Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed SPAMCHK (Message failed SPAMCHK: 176.). 
Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed WEIGHT50 (Weight of 248 reaches or exceeds the 
limit of 50.). Action=DELETE.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed SPAMDOMAINS (). Action=WARN.
09/28/2003 00:29:22 Q71ab0f6 Msg failed BOGONS (ch 2aca46a ipfile against 100/8 
(nm=ff00).). Action=IGNORE.

I'm running 1.7, ran the updater, and all seems well.
Any thoughts?

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Five Ten List

2003-09-25 Thread Doug McKee
My server is blocked by five-ten because the author doesn't like Broadwing? I am 
immediately going to quit using the five-ten lists because I don't know who else this 
gentleman doesn't like.

The response is:

IP address 67.99.44.6 is listed here as broadwing.net spam-support. Please note that 
the following comments apply to broadwing.net since 67.99.44.6 seems to be owned or 
controlled by them.

This does NOT mean that we ever received spam from 67.99.44.6. It just means that the 
upstream owner of that address block (which seems to be broadwing.net) is listed here 
for spam support. That upstream needs to resolve the below issues.

added 2003-09-09; spam support - see www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL10270


If some mail server is rejecting your email based on the above listing, ask them to 
either whitelist your address or to stop using this list. I don't know who is using 
blackholes.five-ten-sg.com to block email - it is my personal list used to protect my 
personal mail servers (and my clients). I make it public so that anyone who has mail 
rejected here can find out why it was rejected.

You might want to search on Google in news.admin.net-abuse.* for broadwing.net. You 
might consider moving to a provider whose ip packets are more acceptable to the rest 
of the internet. 


Doug



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Strange Trail

2003-09-13 Thread Doug McKee
fantasticbradleys.net  dragonstarts.com  ENCHANTINGIDEAS.NET  MITCHMYERSENT.BIZ  
SECURESERVER.NET
a1fastrx.com  Secureserver.net
best-usa-rx.com  secureserver.net
EVERLAST123.BIZ  wwdomains.com  Secureserver.net  jomax.net  godaddy.com

I discovered the above relationships while looking for commonality in the sources of 
this mornings spamn load. Interestingly enough if you go to jomax.net the godaddy.com 
page opens.
The whois DNS for godaddy.com IS jomax.net
Either I'm misinterpreting this or someone at godaddy needs to clean up their act. 

Doug McKee

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Strange Subject

2003-09-10 Thread Doug McKee
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

How about 4 different super tests?  I fail automatically on 
=?ISO-8859-1?B?, and that accounts for more than 1% of the 
What is your test setup for the above string, please?
Thanks,
Doug




How about 4 different super tests? I fail automatically on
=?ISO-8859-1?B?, and that accounts for more than 1% of the E-mail
coming in to my server, but only a handful of additional catches in
what was being missed...no false positives. I think I've mentioned
enough times, the other tests that I would like to have...a BODYTEXT
filter that searches just a decoded non-HTML body, a NOTEXT test for
nothing but spaces and returns and attachments (that's a key) after
decoding and de-HTMLifying, and a TEXTCOUNT marquee test that would
allow you to search for amounts of non-HTML decoded body text just just
like SUBECTSPACES and BCC, but in reverse (the less there is, the
higher the score). I could catch so much crap with those 40 or so two
character gibberish strings, in fact I think it was properly tagging
around 10% to 20% of all unique incoming messages today if not more.
That gibberish subject filter is tagging over 5% by itself, and with
perfect accuracy so far. A functional gibberish body filter though
would have a reasonable number of false positives (was tagging buy.com
links that were shown in displayable text for instance). I don't of
course though expect Scott to rush to my aid here.

I have managed to add though tests for SUBECTSPACES (very effective),
COMMENTS (effective) and BCC (just ok), along with some small key
word/phrase filters for the body, subject and sender with very good
success. I only saw about 5 definitive false positives today out of
around 3000 unique messages, but approximately 150 pieces of spam got
through. I think that could be reduced by as much as half without a
measurable impact on the false positives. If that doesn't work, I'm
buying a gun :)

BTW, on Linux, my guru buddy recommends Postfix as the SMTP client and
Webmin as the interface. I don't though dispute Sandy's faith in MS
SMTP, and it can be run on the same box as IMail.

Matt




Dan Patnode wrote:

  FYI, I pulled this test 3 weeks ago after a email from France came through (or rather didn't) with this subject:

Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RW5qb3kgc3VtbWVyIHVudGlsIGl0cyB2ZXJ5IGVuZCE=?=

There's definitely is a correlation here among spammers, ?B? encoded subjects, disposable domain names, and nothing else in the body of the message.  There has to be a way to bring the 2 or 3 variables togther as a super test.


Dan


On Monday, September 8, 2003 19:05, Matthew Bramble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
Use a text filter and add something like:

SUBJECT 40 CONTAINS =?ISO-8859-1?b?

to it.

I tried this all the way down to ust ?b? and a SUBJECT filter
didn't catch it. The SUBJECT filter also doesn't catch the
decoded text.

I found though that if you use the HEADERS filter, it will
catch this (customize to suit, this will only catch Latin-1
that is base64 encoded, and I can't think of why that would be
necessary, I would think that only other charactersets could
need this):

 HEADERS  10  CONTAINS ISO-8859-1?B?

Neither the HEADERS filter nor the SUBJECT filter is catching
the decoded form of the text. The BASE64 test is also not
catching this if it's only in the Subject of the message (I
assume it only does the body/attachments).

The not so funny thing is that I'm getting this now as a part
of those E-mails containing no displayable text. This guy is
real good at getting through my settings unless he chooses a
bad IP to send from. I think a few days ago, another person on
this list commented about this same spammer, bringing up the
domains that he is using (common words followed by numbers).
The only pattern this guys leaves apart from having no text in
the body, is having different country's TLDs listed in the
Received line, the sender, and the reverse DNS. Here's a copy
of what I just received using this technique (with links
modified):



  
  From - Mon Sep 08 17:36:44 2003
  
  
X-UIDL: 314612976
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
X-Mozilla-Status2: 
Received: from gjr.paknet.com.pk [81.128.130.33] by igaia.com with ESMTP
 (SMTPD32-7.13) id A6244F101D8; Mon, 08 Sep 2003 17:35:32 -0400
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 21:35:35 +
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
=?ISO-8859-1?B?UmU6T3JkZXIgU2lsZGVuYWZpbCBDaXRyYXRlICBmcm9tIGhvbWUgLSBubyBkb2N0b3IgcmVxdWlyZWQu?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Shirley Dalton" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [81.128.130.33]
X-Declude-Spoolname: Df62404f101d89e2c.SMD
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by iGaia Incorporated's E-mail
service (www.igaia.com) for spam.
X-Note: This E-mail was sent from
host81-128-130-33.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([81.128.130.33]).
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: DSN, IPNOTINMX, NOLEGITCONTENT [1]

Re: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Using Declude to block Sobig Virus

2003-09-04 Thread Doug McKee
If I am using Declude as a gateway and block the offending IP, will I not also have to 
block the IP in the real mail server as well?

Doug

Because the IMail SMTP Control Access file will prevent the connection from even 
occurring, which will save on bandwidth (about 100K per virus blocked).  It also 
saves some other resources, such as CPU usage, that would be used if it was received 
and scanned.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Domain Processing

2003-09-02 Thread Doug McKee

If a test is listed in the Global.cfg file and in the domain file will the
process be run twice?
Thanks,
Doug

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Domain Processing

2003-09-02 Thread Doug McKee

Sorry about the incomplete nature of the question.

If a test is in the global.cfg and listed in BOTH the
declude\$default$.JunkMail file
and in the declude\domain\$default$.JunkMail file as well, will the test be
run twice?
I am just wondering if that would have an effect on the processor time.
Doug



If a test is listed in the Global.cfg file and in the domain file will the
process be run twice?

If a test definition appears once in the global.cfg file, it will only be
run once.  If it appears two or more times in the global.cfg file, it may
or may not be run more than once, depending on the type of test (ip4r tests
and external programs have cached results, for example, so they would only
be run once).

-Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Unknown Folder

2003-06-28 Thread Doug McKee

In my spool folder this morning are a bunch of .vir folders with
1_1.exe in them.
I have not encountered these before.
What are they?

Thanks,
Doug McKee

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Confusing Log Messages

2003-06-11 Thread Doug McKee


06/11/2003 15:59:31 Q982f0f6 Your virus scanner DOES NOT EXIST (at
d:\IMail\spool\D982f0f6.vir\); NOT SCANNING ATTACHMENTS! [2]
06/11/2003 15:59:31 Q982f0f6 Scanned: Error starting scanner
06/11/2003 15:59:32 Q98150c4 Could not find report file
d:\IMail\spool\D98150c4.vir\report.txt.
06/11/2003 15:59:32 Q98150c4 Your virus scanner DOES NOT EXIST (at
d:\IMail\spool\D98150c4.vir\); NOT SCANNING ATTACHMENTS! [2]
06/11/2003 15:59:32 Q98150c4 Scanned: Error starting scanner
06/11/2003 15:59:43 Q983b022 Your virus scanner DOES NOT EXIST (at
d:\IMail\spool\D983b022.vir\); NOT SCANNING ATTACHMENTS! [2]
06/11/2003 15:59:43 Q983b022 Scanned: Error starting scanner
06/11/2003 15:59:59 Q98480a6 Outlook 'CR' vulnerability [From: Tru] in line
7
06/11/2003 15:59:59 Q98480a6 Scanned: CONTAINS A VIRUS [Prescan OK][MIME: 1
670]

Just Installed AVG as second engine with the following config.

SCANFILEC:\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\fpcmd.exe /ALL /SILENT /NOMEM /NOBOOT
/REPORT=report.txt
VIRUSCODE 3
VIRUSCODE 6
REPORTInfection:

SCANFILEC:\Progra~1\Grisoft\AVG6\avg.exe /NOMEM /NOSELF /ARC
VIRUSCODE 2
VIRUSCODE 6


What have I misconfigured?
Thanks,
Doug

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] IMail Expres Lite

2003-05-29 Thread Doug McKee
The free version of IMail is for one domain. Can it be used with JM and
Virus?

Doug


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Way OT now!

2002-10-16 Thread Doug McKee

Some VERY wise sage once opined,  I have given up the search for truth and
am now willing to settle for a pleasant fantasy.

Doug

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.