[Declude.JunkMail] OT: The Titian Key Product to Remove Spam.. patent pending?

2003-06-06 Thread Eddie Pang



FWIW..

Looks like a 
variation of a mail gateway at a cost of $1000.00 per month!

http://www.titankey.com/features.asp

eddie 
:)


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS server returned server failure for

2003-03-11 Thread Eddie Pang
I have suffered from this also, so much so that I have even explored the use
of SimpleDNS without success thinking that this was a external DNS problem.
I was hoping that by bringing the DNS (as a DNS cache) locally to the mail
server did infact reduce the frequency of this error, unfortunately it did
not solve the occurance of this error.

Although this may not help, I am just laying out on the table my
observations for all to pounder over..

Eddie :)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 9:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS server returned server failure for


What is the best way to diagnose/investigate these:

03/11/2003 11:04:05 Q33230c6100e83de9 WARNING: DNS server 67.94.227.35
returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX or A for

John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA  92835
www.reliancesoft.com


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Forcing sum of weights to exact weight question...

2003-03-01 Thread Eddie Pang
I'm pretty sure this can't be done, but what the heck right :)
 
Overview of weights
 
Filter1 (foreign characters)  RouteTo  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filter2 (adult spam)  RouteTo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Weight23-30   Action HOLD
Weight31-200 Action RouteTo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Here is my problem, When I have spam that fails filter1 or filter2 tests with a score 
of 25, the HOLD action superceeds the RouteTo action.

Is it possible to state somewhere in the Golbal.cfg that:
 
If filter1 fails, reset Total weights to 210.
If filter2 fails, reset Total weights to 220.
 
This way i do not need to make extremely wide ranges above 200 to compensate for the 
various sums..  Did I lose anyone yet? :)
 
Sincerely,
 
Eddie :)

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] FW: Filters

2002-11-29 Thread eddie pang
Do the filters have to be a single word, or can it contains a exact phrase?

e.g.

BODY  100 CONTAINS Foreign Liaison Officer of the board of trustee
of RWA Agency ( Relief West Africa)

Thanks,
Eddie :)

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: Filters

2002-11-29 Thread eddie pang
Better yet, maybe if it was stated in the documentation, a search would not
be needed.  Nor would a email of this question would have materialized.

Eddie Pang.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 2:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: Filters


A search of the archives would show that this has been asked before and the
answer is no, spaces are not allowed.

Declude is working on possibly changing this.

John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA  92835
www.reliancesoft.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of eddie pang
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 3:38 PM
To: Declude. JunkMail@declude. com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: Filters

Do the filters have to be a single word, or can it contains a exact phrase?

e.g.

BODY  100 CONTAINS Foreign Liaison Officer of the board of trustee
of RWA Agency ( Relief West Africa)

Thanks,
Eddie :)

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Displaying Message weight in the header

2002-11-29 Thread eddie pang
Add a %WEIGHT% into the header.

e.g.
XINHEADER   X-Spam-Tests-Failed: %WEIGHT% %TESTSFAILED%

eddie :)


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of malcolm
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 5:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Displaying Message weight in the header


Hi,

Is it possible to display the final weight of the message in the header

Regards,
   Malcolm
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: Filters

2002-11-29 Thread eddie pang
This example is used to remove s*pam with korean characters in emails,
contributed to me by Heinrich.

e.g.
HEADERS 50  CONTAINSeuc-kr
HEADERS 50  CONTAINSks_c

eddie :)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of malcolm
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 4:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: Filters


Is there a test like this for headers?

Regards

-- Original Message --
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Fri, 29 Nov 2002 19:26:15 -0500


spaces are not allowed.

Spaces are actually fine in the filters; the problem is that you can't have
spaces before or after what you are filtering.  For example, you can have:

BODY 100 CONTAINS Foreign Liaison Officer of the board of trustee of RWA
Agency ( Relief West Africa)

but, that would function identically to:

BODY 100 CONTAINS Foreign Liaison Officer of the board of trustee
of RWA Agency ( Relief West Africa)

(which has spaces before and after the filter text).  This is typically a
problem when trying to match words, so that word won't catch crossword.
 -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Charset filter.

2002-11-28 Thread eddie pang
Thank you, Very very much!!!
I've been bashing my head trying to get this to work...

Sincerely,
Eddie :)


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Heinrich Richter
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 10:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Charset filter.


Hi Eddie,

we receive a lot of SPAM from Korea. For this reason we have set up a filter
by charset and assign this mails a high weight. This works very good for us.
Following is the context of the korea.txt file.


HEADERS 15 CONTAINS big5
HEADERS 15 CONTAINS euc-kr
HEADERS 15 CONTAINS gb2312
HEADERS 15 CONTAINS iso-2022-jp
HEADERS 15 CONTAINS iso-2022-kr
HEADERS 15 CONTAINS ks_c


Heinrich


- Original Message -
From: eddie pang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 8:39 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Charset filter.


 Does anyone check the charset of a email?

 We are receiving a bunch of korean emails from hotmail and yahoo, I was
 wondering if anyone has setup a filter isolating emails by charsets?

 Thanks,
 Eddie :)

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 -
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus/F-Prot]



-
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus/F-Prot]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] Charset filter.

2002-11-27 Thread eddie pang
Does anyone check the charset of a email?

We are receiving a bunch of korean emails from hotmail and yahoo, I was
wondering if anyone has setup a filter isolating emails by charsets?

Thanks,
Eddie :)

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Test - Invalid WHITELIST Type.

2002-11-22 Thread eddie pang
Hi Jeff,

I just tried using the default stated in the
http://www.declude.com/Release/162/GLOBAL.CFG and I get this message.

11/22/2002 16:23:02  Invalid WHITELIST type: HABEAS

I just tried it last night without success, and your email reminded me reply
to this post...

Sincerely,
Eddie :)



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Kratka
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Test


Just as a curiosity, is anyone using the Habeas test and if so does it help?

Jeff

*
TymeWyse Internet
P.O.Box 84 - 583 N. Main St., Canyonville, OR 97417
tel/fax: (541) 839-6027  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] Helobogus error..

2002-11-19 Thread eddie pang
Hi All,

I was wondering if someone can has experienced a error in helobogus.  For
some weird reason, I consistantly get a error with helobogus like
hotmail.com with the msg failed.  For some reason cs.com does not resolve
either.

11/19/2002 00:05:07 Q0cd19bfb002cf91d HELOBOGUS:8 REVDNS:4 .  Total weight =
12
11/19/2002 00:05:07 Q0cd19bfb002cf91d Msg failed HELOBOGUS (Domain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] by has no MX/A records.).
11/19/2002 00:05:07 Q0cd19bfb002cf91d Msg failed REVDNS (This E-mail was
sent from a MUA/MTA  with no reverse DNS entry.).
11/19/2002 00:05:07 Q0cd19bfb002cf91d Msg failed WEIGHT10 (Weight of 12
reaches or exceeds the limit of 10.).
11/19/2002 00:05:07 Q0cd19bfb002cf91d Msg failed WEIGHT12 (Weight of 12
reaches or exceeds the limit of 12.).
11/19/2002 00:05:07 Q0cd19bfb002cf91d Subject: [FWD: Fwd: FW: Fun Stuff]
11/19/2002 00:05:07 Q0cd19bfb002cf91d From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thanks in advance,
eddie :)

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx

2002-11-13 Thread eddie pang
 If you feel that for some reason I am wrong for placing them into the
list then I would like to here it.  I am only human and un-like a computer I
do make mistakes and unlike a computer I try to rectify them.

I hope Spews is listening...

Sorry i just could not resist...

eddie :)

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FX Apps

2002-11-08 Thread eddie pang
Hi Karl,

You may want to checkout http://www.iopus.com/beee.htm

Its a neefty little program that will email a single file or a group of
files in a subdirectory when its created.  Its great for reports that take
overnight to complete.

eddie.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of Karl Hentschel
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 6:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FX Apps


That would be useful but in the meantime I wrote a little batch file that
runs delog, pauses (to let it complete) then renames the default text file
to the current date. It worked last night so now I am going to have it move
it to the spool directory. I would also like to have it email me a copy
automatically. Any ideas how to accomplish that?

Karl

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of Tom
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 5:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FX Apps



 Does this update include the option to set the t_rep: option to
 LOG in order to write a report to the Spool directory?

Not yet, though I am considering it.

Regards,
Tom
Image`fx

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] Junkmail on a backup relay to another Imail server filtered once again.

2002-11-06 Thread eddie pang
Hi all,

I have a quick question.  We have just installed a backup relay to capture
all incoming emails in the event our mail server goes down.
I have basically made the 2 systems the same priority on the DNS so I can
capture some traffic to the backup relay for data.

I want to make our relay server just kill off all emails that it captures
that are on our blacklist for definite kills. All others will then be
directed to our primary email server for final spam filtering.  I want this
so i can just evaluate all emails on HOLD on our main server rather than
going to 2 servers and evaluating the HOLD mails.

This is what I have so far.

All emails are scanned and filtered on the backup relay, as expected.  But!!
As the email is fowarded to the main email server, the email server does not
scan the relayed mail again in greater detail, instead i get a message
E-mail whitelisted - automatically passing all spam tests [@domain.edu]

Our mail relay is called MGateway.domain.edu and in our global.cfg I have
WHITELIST FROM @Domain.edu.

Any hints as to where MGateway.domain.edu is considered okay for processing
in Junkmail?

Thanks in advance,
Eddie :)

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] HOLD action using Imail/Junkmail as a multiple domain gateway

2002-10-30 Thread eddie pang
Hi Everyone,

We are currently using our email server as a primary email/virus/junkmail
server for [ourdomain.edu].

I want to service another external domain [aaa.edu] with virus/junkmail,
using Imail as a smarthost/gateway for the other domain.

Here is my question.
If I setup virus and junkmail as a per-domain config, where does the
junkmail hold files get stored for [aaa.edu] domain?
The default is \IMail\spool\spam for a single domain like
ourdomain.edu[default], would aaa.edu get stored in
\IMail\spool\aaa.edu\spam ??

I would like to separate our holds from the other site's hold files.  Is
this possible?

Many thanks,
Eddie :)

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HOLD action using Imail/Junkmail as a multiple domain gateway

2002-10-30 Thread Eddie Pang
Thanks Scott for the update..

Sincerely,
Eddie :)


=
No -- the HOLD action always will quarantine the E-mail to the 
\IMail\spool\spam directory.  However, we have had a number of requests
for 
a way to have the directory configurable on a per-domain basis, so this 
will likely get added at some point.
   -Scott


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] Customizing filters

2002-10-16 Thread eddie pang

I'm stumpted...
How can I apply a weight system to the filter list?

I am trying to create a word filter that will flag out Subject: Monday's
Motivation from a certain user.  Yet, be okay from another user using that
subject.

I am just testing the word monday's in the subject.  Total weight=4.
It rejects because of the Filters HOLD in $default.junkmail. Good...

Now i remove FILTERS HOLD, and everything passes..  How can I apply a weight
system to the filter list?


Thanks in advance...

Eddie :)



==
Filter.txt

SUBJECT  3 CONTAINS Monday's
SUBJECT  3 CONTAINS Motivation
MAILFROM5   IS  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  edited

==
Global.cfg

FILTERS  filter   D:\IMail\Declude\filter.txt X1   0

WEIGHT10 weight  xx  10 0
WEIGHT20 weight  xx  20 0
CATCHALLMAILS catchallmails xx  0 0

==
$default$.junkmail
FILTERS  HOLD
WEIGHT10 HOLD
WEIGHT20 HOLD

==
Declude log
10/16/2002 15:37:58 Q1474081900e8abf4 FILTERS:4 .  Total weight = 4
10/16/2002 15:37:58 Q1474081900e8abf4 Msg failed FILTERS (Message failed
FILTERS test (1)).
10/16/2002 15:37:58 Q1474081900e8abf4 Subject: monday's
10/16/2002 15:37:58 Q1474081900e8abf4 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
edited

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] Spam Mail Statistics

2002-10-14 Thread eddie pang

Hi everyone,

New user to JunkMail here..

I know that declude has a spam trap.  Is there data available on this to
determine how effective each test is?

I am very interested in expanding our definitions from the current defaults,
but before i can do that, i kinda would like to see how the each test
compares at a bigger sampling..  Or is everyone going on different
pathways...

Also, how can i create a spam trap, to evaluate how effective each test is
to properly setup each weights.  e.g.  Is there a test that is 100%
effective in identifying spam like helobogus, but many spam can bypass this.
This way this test is tier one.  If a spam fails this, go no further and
delete.  If helobogus is okay, then apply test 2, etc...  I know this is
very linear, but without any data on the effectiveness of each test,
customizing the defs is gonna be purely trial and error, which I so want to
limit..

I dont know...  What you you all recommend on how new users should approach
to building a better and efficient definitions...
Is there a tool available that will read the junkmail logs and break down
each test as to their effectiveness?

Sincerely,
eddie.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Mail Statistics

2002-10-14 Thread eddie pang

EXCELLENT!! :)

Many thanks :)  Atleast now I aint going in blind, although I still dont
know what to do, but thats another issue :)

Cheers!
eddie.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Smart Business
Lists
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 12:24 AM
To: eddie pang
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Mail Statistics


eddie,

Monday, October 14, 2002 you wrote:
EP New user to JunkMail here..

Welcome to the war.

EP I know that declude has a spam trap. Is there data available on
EP this to determine how effective each test is?

Scott posts his monthly spam stats to the IMAIL forum - see
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
search for Spam Statistics or for September see
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com/msg58649.html

I think a lot of others keep stats on test results but I don't
think I've seen them widely posted.  There are 3rd party programs
to help you monitor tests and results.  See
http://www.declude.com/tools/index.html

EP I am very interested in expanding our definitions from the current
EP defaults, but before i can do that, i kinda would like to see how
EP the each test compares at a bigger sampling.. Or is everyone going
EP on different pathways...

My experience indicates that communities are sufficiently
different to require research and subsequent changes. The
September and August report from Scott referenced above will
certainly give you a larger picture.

The problem is not so much trapping messages as that is easy but
not trapping legitimate (and wanted) messages that fail tests.
There are a good many blacklists of IP's and addresses posted all
over the web and there are contributors both here and on the IMAIL
list that post such lists.  But for the most part where I have
tried these in the past I just end up having to weed out more
false spam messages.

EP Also, how can i create a spam trap,

discussed at
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg02642.html
and try a google on the phrase create a spam trap

EP to evaluate how effective each test is to properly setup each
EP weights e.g. Is there a test that is 100% effective in
EP identifying spam like helobogus

There is really nothing that 100% of spam fails and 100% of
non-spam doesn't fail as far as I know.

I fail on the single tests: ORDB, MAILFROM, PERCENT, SNIFFER, and
one IP blacklist.  All other tests have to accumulate to a fail
weight.

EP recommend on how new users should approach to building a better
EP and efficient definitions...

It depends a bit on what you want to do.  You can take a wholesale
approach and delete or mark many messages and try to figure out a
way to move the responsibility downstream to the user - or not.

Or you can take a more granular approach and try to refine your
system so that you are more and more effective on trapping spam
and reducing false positives.

In the former case it doesn't matter too much what you do.

In the latter though you have to develop a review strategy for
your spam control system. It is not something you can do just once
and forget because things change.

1) develop a review strategy
   a) LOG action and then review declude logs
   b) HOLD action and then review with a program like spam review
  (you have to add lines to the header to indicate tests
  failed and weights)
   c) combination of a and b

2) develop your own weighting system
   a) some have several levels with different action
   b) I use pass/HOLD but I review HOLD

3) the Plus and Minus weights with filters is very good and allows
   really good tweaking

4) develop actions you can manage
   It is not possible for very  high volume systems to hold and
   review messages as an example.

I think it is better to start simpler and then gradually add
complexity as you understand what is happening.

Another very good tool for us was Sniffer - see
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/
helped reduce our false positives to about 1% from 4%

EP Is there a tool available that will read the junkmail logs and
EP break down each test as to their effectiveness?

http://www.declude.com/tools/index.html
lots of good things reported about spam review.

HTH

Terry Fritts

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL