Keith, I think you've caught a bug in Declude.
I've verified what you found, and I'm enclosing a sample GMail with complete
header (not mangled through a mail client).
What I think Declude is doing is finding the text subject: in the domain
keys header, instead of the the subject: line that follows a newline
sequence.
Comments from Declude support?
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: Keith Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 2:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] subjectchars
Anyone have an issue using gmail.com email that is fails the subjectchars
test if you place more than one word in the subject line?
Line reads:
LONGSUBJsubjectchars60 * 0 0
Subject Line used: Test Me
Keith
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193] by mail.bentall.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.12) id AEB641D011A; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 14:41:58 -0800
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c16so173904rne
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 14:41:49 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
b=len5+FwhmL5PqpXyhZVmfwExa09IUKZIzOT5YntxbFGVF2oMfa8MWV6SsBRFvCIqaMxOErU88tgd6S9NKjid78jSKKQpccspTX3epNA17vLuaVwUBlgnCQe+hsjobm3Mr+4zfwonng2R7pNUbsRqzjMruvvTpkt9A+sAo0gf5zI=
Received: by 10.38.86.21 with SMTP id j21mr336907rnb;
Wed, 03 Nov 2004 14:41:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.38.92.46 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:41:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:41:49 -0800
From: Andrew Colbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Andrew Colbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Test Line
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-RBL-Warning: LONGSUBJECT: Subject with at least 70 characters found.
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [64.233.170.193]
X-Declude-Spoolname: D5eb6041d011a6a53.SMD
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: IPNOTINMX, WEIGHT20, LONGSUBJECT, SPFPASS, COUNTRY
X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES-destination
X-Note: Total spam weight of this E-mail is 20.
redux redux redux
-- Forwarded message --
From: Andrew Colbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:35:22 -0800
Subject: Test Line
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ah, but did it fail longsubj or base64sub?
Inquiring minds want to know.
