RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Cutting down on DNS

2009-07-13 Thread Michael Cummins
Actually, I was reading this when I thought of it, and thinking of how
INVURIBL reads the links

inside of an e-mail and then compares them to a configured RBL, like the
recommended Invaluement paid subscription.

 

http://www.blue-quartz.com/rbl/

 

It would be much more efficient to store large numbers of IPs in DNS than it
would a plain text blacklist, wouldn't it - or am I wrong about that?

 

This is the relevant quote from this page:

 

If a blacklisted IP address is in your rbl database it will exist in the
DNS system.

 

For example:

 

if you blacklisted IP 89.40.1.32

 

then doing a regular DNS lookup like this:

 

nslookup test.rbl.mydomain.com

nslookup 32.1.40.89.rbl.mydomain.com

 

should result in a match of 127.0.0.2

 

I haven't figured out how to get the e-mail harvesting IP blocks out of
SmarterMail yet, but if I could, then if I could script-insert them into DNS
and then use that as a local RBL, do you think that would be an effective
tool?  Those are the spammers that are banging on my door, right?

 

-- Michael Cummins

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 3:09 AM
To: Michael Cummins
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Cutting down on DNS

 

 Probably a crazy question, but if I wrote a script to harvest the current

 blocks (for e-mail harvesting) out of SmarterMail (if such a thing could
be

 done) would that make a good or a bad local URI?

 

Are  you  talking  about  turning  a  list  of  IPs  into  a  list  of

dotted-decimal URIs like http://1.2.3.4 ? That doesn't make sense.

 

--Sandy

 

 



Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist

Broadleaf Systems, a division of

Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.

e-mail: sa...@cypressintegrated.com

 

SpamAssassin plugs into Declude!

 
http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/release
/

 

Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange or IMail mailboxes into IMail
Aliases!

 
http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/downloa
d/release/

 
http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/download/re
lease/

 

 

 

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To

unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and

type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found

at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Cutting down on DNS

2009-07-11 Thread David Dodell


On Jul 10, 2009, at 12:50 PM, Scott Fisher wrote:


SORBS is shutting down. Might want to remove that http://www.au.sorbs.net/



Actually their website announced that they found other hosting  
arrangements and will not be shutting down at this time.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Cutting down on DNS

2009-07-10 Thread Michael Cummins
 And my other recommendation stands -- look into which BLs will let you
 replicate their zone/s locally.

Thank you for your advice.

Among other things, I've been reviewing the spam tests I've enabled.  I
thought I might share my observations with the list here, as a sounding
board.  Perhaps I will help someone, perhaps I will expose a poor decision.

I deactivated the following tests, because my DLAnalyzer told me that they
fetched less than 3% positives over the last 9 days (an arbitrary
selection):

AHBL 
AHBL-DOMAINS
DNSBL
IADB
LNG
MAILPOLICE-BLOCK
MAILPOLICE-DOMAIN
MAILPOLICE-FRAUD
MAILPOLICE-HELO
MAILPOLICE-REVDNS
MAILPOLICE-REVWEBMAIL
MXRATE-SUSPICIOUS
NJABL
VIRBL

I noticed that these tests had returned the largest number of hits (for this
type of test), so I thought I'd mention them:

BARRACUDA
HOSTKARMA-BLACK
ZEN
UCEPROTECT-2
UCEPROTECT-3
CBL 
SORBS 
UCEPROTECT-1
SPAMCOP
MXRATE-BLOCK

How does one go about replicating a zone locally to begin with?  Can you
replicate multiple zones locally?  Should you do this on the machine that is
hosting SmarterMail/Declude, or on another?

Sniffer is my best test.  INVURIBL used to be fantastic, but it doesn't fare
quite as well these days.  Does anyone recommend anything else?


Thanks for the discussion!

-- Michael Cummins





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Cutting down on DNS

2009-07-10 Thread David Barker
IADB holds the IP's of good senders and helps reduce false positives so the
hit rate may be low but it is worth having. MAILPOLICE can be consolidated
into a single lookup.

David Barker
VP Operations Declude
Your Email security is our business
978.499.2933 office
978.988.1311 fax
dbar...@declude.com



-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Cummins
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 2:58 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Cutting down on DNS

 And my other recommendation stands -- look into which BLs will let you
 replicate their zone/s locally.

Thank you for your advice.

Among other things, I've been reviewing the spam tests I've enabled.  I
thought I might share my observations with the list here, as a sounding
board.  Perhaps I will help someone, perhaps I will expose a poor decision.

I deactivated the following tests, because my DLAnalyzer told me that they
fetched less than 3% positives over the last 9 days (an arbitrary
selection):

AHBL 
AHBL-DOMAINS
DNSBL
IADB
LNG
MAILPOLICE-BLOCK
MAILPOLICE-DOMAIN
MAILPOLICE-FRAUD
MAILPOLICE-HELO
MAILPOLICE-REVDNS
MAILPOLICE-REVWEBMAIL
MXRATE-SUSPICIOUS
NJABL
VIRBL

I noticed that these tests had returned the largest number of hits (for this
type of test), so I thought I'd mention them:

BARRACUDA
HOSTKARMA-BLACK
ZEN
UCEPROTECT-2
UCEPROTECT-3
CBL 
SORBS 
UCEPROTECT-1
SPAMCOP
MXRATE-BLOCK

How does one go about replicating a zone locally to begin with?  Can you
replicate multiple zones locally?  Should you do this on the machine that is
hosting SmarterMail/Declude, or on another?

Sniffer is my best test.  INVURIBL used to be fantastic, but it doesn't fare
quite as well these days.  Does anyone recommend anything else?


Thanks for the discussion!

-- Michael Cummins





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Cutting down on DNS

2009-07-10 Thread Scott Fisher
Cbl is a subset of zen.spamhaus.org so you could be double scoring that.

UCEPROTECT-2 and UCEPROTECT-1 overlap considerable. You are probably double
scoring there.

DNSBL and IADB are whitelists. They would have lower scores.

SORBS is shutting down. Might want to remove that http://www.au.sorbs.net/

Mxrate-suspicious comes along with the same DNS test as MXRate-black. So no
need to disable that as it doesn't induce extra dns traffic.


-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Cummins
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 1:58 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Cutting down on DNS


 And my other recommendation stands -- look into which BLs will let you
 replicate their zone/s locally.

Thank you for your advice.

Among other things, I've been reviewing the spam tests I've enabled.  I
thought I might share my observations with the list here, as a sounding
board.  Perhaps I will help someone, perhaps I will expose a poor decision.

I deactivated the following tests, because my DLAnalyzer told me that they
fetched less than 3% positives over the last 9 days (an arbitrary
selection):

AHBL 
AHBL-DOMAINS
DNSBL
IADB
LNG
MAILPOLICE-BLOCK
MAILPOLICE-DOMAIN
MAILPOLICE-FRAUD
MAILPOLICE-HELO
MAILPOLICE-REVDNS
MAILPOLICE-REVWEBMAIL
MXRATE-SUSPICIOUS
NJABL
VIRBL

I noticed that these tests had returned the largest number of hits (for this
type of test), so I thought I'd mention them:

BARRACUDA
HOSTKARMA-BLACK
ZEN
UCEPROTECT-2
UCEPROTECT-3
CBL 
SORBS 
UCEPROTECT-1
SPAMCOP
MXRATE-BLOCK

How does one go about replicating a zone locally to begin with?  Can you
replicate multiple zones locally?  Should you do this on the machine that is
hosting SmarterMail/Declude, or on another?

Sniffer is my best test.  INVURIBL used to be fantastic, but it doesn't fare
quite as well these days.  Does anyone recommend anything else?


Thanks for the discussion!

-- Michael Cummins





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.