Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Any Known issues Inv-URIBL today?

2008-02-06 Thread Pete McNeil 




On Wednesday, February 6, 2008, 2:09:23 PM, Herb wrote:







Hi Randy;

We have seen that often, in fact what we do is swap that test in on nights and weekends and out during weekdays (by just renaming the declude conf files with a schedule). It is a nice tool but will bog things down.





I'm curious - (I don't use this but many of my customers do)

Is it possible to run Inv-URIBL only on messages that have not yet reached a hold (or other appropriate) weight?

Perhaps using weightgate?

If SNF is running ahead of it then would that have the effect of only running inv-URIBL on messages that have not already been tagged as spam by SNF?

What are the limits of conditional test triggers in the Declude environment (aside from AVAFTERJM)?

_M




---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.

Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Any Known issues Inv-URIBL today?

2008-02-06 Thread Randy Armbrecht 
Peter,

Thanks for the response.  Darrell had pointed us to WeightGate about a year ago 
- that helped clean up a few CPU issues we were having at that time.



---
Randy A.
Technical Support Director
Global Web Solutions, Inc.
804-442-5300
http://globalweb.net

  - Original Message - 
  From: Pete McNeil 
  To: Herb Guenther 
  Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 2:31 PM
  Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Any Known issues Inv-URIBL today?


  On Wednesday, February 6, 2008, 2:09:23 PM, Herb wrote:





   Hi Randy;




We have seen that often, in fact what we do is swap that test in on 
nights and weekends and out during weekdays (by just renaming the declude conf 
files with a schedule).  It is a nice tool but will bog things down.
   




  I'm curious - (I don't use this but many of my customers do)




  Is it possible to run Inv-URIBL only on messages that have not yet reached a 
hold (or other appropriate) weight?




  Perhaps using weightgate?




  If SNF is running ahead of it then would that have the effect of only running 
inv-URIBL on messages that have not already been tagged as spam by SNF?




  What are the limits of conditional test triggers in the Declude environment 
(aside from AVAFTERJM)?




  _M


  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.