[jira] [Comment Edited] (DERBY-6904) Enhance ALTER TABLE to allow CYCLE option to be changed.

2017-03-12 Thread Harshvardhan Gupta (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906477#comment-15906477
 ] 

Harshvardhan Gupta edited comment on DERBY-6904 at 3/12/17 10:14 AM:
-

Update on previous comment - 

I tested with various scenarios by creating database without and with the new 
changes using IJ. Whenever I try to access any of the databases created without 
my changes through the patched version I get this error -

"XSCH5: In a base table there was a mismatch between the requested column 
number 9 and the maximum number of columns 9.". Note that we increased the 
number of columns in SYSCOLUMNs from 9 to 10 in this patch.

Should we incorporate a update strategy when older databases are accessed by 
this patched version?


was (Author: harshvardhan145):
Update on previous comment - 

I tested with various scenarios by creating database without and with the new 
changes using IJ. Whenever I try to access any of the databases created without 
my changes through the patched version I get this error -

"In a base table there was a mismatch between the requested column number 9 and 
the maximum number of columns 9.". Note that we increased the number of columns 
in SYSCOLUMNs from 9 to 10 in this patch.

Should we incorporate a update strategy when older databases are accessed by 
this patched version?

> Enhance ALTER TABLE to allow CYCLE option to be changed.
> 
>
> Key: DERBY-6904
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6904
> Project: Derby
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: SQL
>Affects Versions: 10.13.1.0
>Reporter: Bryan Pendleton
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: 6904.diff, columnMismatch, compareDbName
>
>
> It would be nice to have a variant of the ALTER TABLE statement,
> similar to the SET INCREMENT BY or SET RESTART WITH variants,
> that allowed a user to change the CYCLE option on an IDENTITY column.
> I think that the code flow for this could be closely modelled on the
> code flow for the SET INCREMENT BY variant: after the statement
> is parsed, we simply need to drop and recreate the underlying SEQUENCE
> object with the desired CYCLE option (and preserving all the other
> aspects of the underlying SEQUENCE object.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


[jira] [Commented] (DERBY-6904) Enhance ALTER TABLE to allow CYCLE option to be changed.

2017-03-12 Thread Harshvardhan Gupta (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906477#comment-15906477
 ] 

Harshvardhan Gupta commented on DERBY-6904:
---

Update on previous comment - 

I tested with various scenarios by creating database without and with the new 
changes using IJ. Whenever I try to access any of the databases created without 
my changes through the patched version I get this error -

"In a base table there was a mismatch between the requested column number 9 and 
the maximum number of columns 9.". Note that we increased the number of columns 
in SYSCOLUMNs from 9 to 10 in this patch.

Should we incorporate a update strategy when older databases are accessed by 
this patched version?

> Enhance ALTER TABLE to allow CYCLE option to be changed.
> 
>
> Key: DERBY-6904
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6904
> Project: Derby
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: SQL
>Affects Versions: 10.13.1.0
>Reporter: Bryan Pendleton
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: 6904.diff, columnMismatch, compareDbName
>
>
> It would be nice to have a variant of the ALTER TABLE statement,
> similar to the SET INCREMENT BY or SET RESTART WITH variants,
> that allowed a user to change the CYCLE option on an IDENTITY column.
> I think that the code flow for this could be closely modelled on the
> code flow for the SET INCREMENT BY variant: after the statement
> is parsed, we simply need to drop and recreate the underlying SEQUENCE
> object with the desired CYCLE option (and preserving all the other
> aspects of the underlying SEQUENCE object.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)