Re: [libreoffice-design] Rebranding result

2013-01-27 Thread klaus-jürgen weghorn ol

Am 27.01.2013 00:39, schrieb Mirek M.:

I'm sure you're all wondering what branding proposal was chosen.
We went for Maxim Darák's proposal, with Mateus Machado Luna coming in a
close second.
Lots of thanks for everyone who participated! :)


Congratulations to the winning proposal.

You should announce it on marketing, website and documentation ml (and 
maybe other mls) as soon as possible.


This decision should lead in near time to proposals for marketing, 
website and documentation team. And this should be done by the design team.


And near time is about two or three weeks.

I personally can't imagine for now how to put it on and integrate it in 
marketing material. So I want to invide you to do some proposals.


But this should be another thread.



--
Grüße
k-j

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-design] Rebranding result

2013-01-27 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hello Mirek,

Cool. Do you have a pointer to the winner's design? All I saw was a non 
standard logo on a white background

Best,

Charles.


Mirek M. maz...@gmail.com a écrit :

I'm sure you're all wondering what branding proposal was chosen.
We went for Maxim Darák's proposal, with Mateus Machado Luna coming in
a
close second.
Lots of thanks for everyone who participated! :)

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted

-- 
Envoyé de mon téléphone avec Kaiten Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-design] Rebranding result

2013-01-27 Thread Pawel Konefal
Mirek,

I think Darak's designs are not good idea considering that his project is
like withdrawal comparing to previous 3.6 design (very basic and not good
looking for me). We should use more green color (like on websites etc.) -
it is more eye friendly and some users, I think, identifies LibreOffice
with this color. I would choose Mateus's Clear_Green_Pref.png, but it's
only my opinion.

Greetings.
Paweł

2013/1/27 Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org

 Hello Mirek,

 Cool. Do you have a pointer to the winner's design? All I saw was a non
 standard logo on a white background

 Best,

 Charles.


 Mirek M. maz...@gmail.com a écrit :

 I'm sure you're all wondering what branding proposal was chosen.
 We went for Maxim Darák's proposal, with Mateus Machado Luna coming in
 a
 close second.
 Lots of thanks for everyone who participated! :)
 
 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more:
 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted

 --
 Envoyé de mon téléphone avec Kaiten Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-design] Rebranding result

2013-01-27 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Well. This mail is a bit difficult. I took a look at the design. It IS 
a non standard logo on a white background.

There are two major issues.
* the logo is NOT the standard logo. You're using an old one from 2010.
* I don't have much to say for the startscreen, but honestly... the 
splashscreen is something I could have done myself and I'm a profound 
idiot when it comes to design. This looks bad, unfinished, and I 
obviously do not have the documented rationale for your choice, but it's 
a bit like any other choice would have been better.


I am very worried about this choice (again, I'm constraining my comment 
to the splashscreen), I'm worried for our image, I'm worried for the 
impression millions of people are going to get every time they'll start 
LibreOffice.


I would like to thank you all for your contributions, I know it's not 
easy and we all have lives outside here, but somebody must have gotten 
really tired or something.


I don't even want to suggest what to do at this point, what process to 
follow, I don't want to choose for the team as it would be disrepectful 
(and this mail is disrespectful enough already) but I can't shut up on 
that one. Please reconsider or do something. It's terrible.


Thanks,

Charles.

Le 27.01.2013 15:00, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :

Hello Mirek,

Cool. Do you have a pointer to the winner's design? All I saw was a
non standard logo on a white background

Best,

Charles.


Mirek M. maz...@gmail.com a écrit :


I'm sure you're all wondering what branding proposal was chosen.
We went for Maxim Darák's proposal, with Mateus Machado Luna coming 
in

a
close second.
Lots of thanks for everyone who participated! :)

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to 
design+h...@global.libreoffice.org

Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot 
be

deleted


--
Envoyé de mon téléphone avec Kaiten Mail. Excusez la brièveté.


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-design] Rebranding result

2013-01-27 Thread klaus-jürgen weghorn ol

Am 27.01.2013 17:40, schrieb Charles-H. Schulz:

Well. This mail is a bit difficult.


Even if it is a BoD member's voice. And this is a ponderous voice.

--
Grüße
k-j

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-design] Rebranding result

2013-01-27 Thread Charles-H. Schulz

Le 27.01.2013 18:42, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol a écrit :

Am 27.01.2013 17:40, schrieb Charles-H. Schulz:

Well. This mail is a bit difficult.


Even if it is a BoD member's voice. And this is a ponderous voice.



It's even more difficult in my position. I realize I'm going to upset a 
dozen people here at least. But  I feel it is my duty not to shut up...


Best,
Charles.



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-design] Rebranding result

2013-01-27 Thread Pawel Konefal
Welcome again,

I want also suggest another option of rebranding.
We can use our 3.6.4 design with only very small change (slightly changed
colors/borders) and give users an option to CHANGE DEFAULT GREEN COLOR (eg.
from Windows or ready palette) - it could be a window after first app start
with choosing color and info about Personas feature. I think it will be
very good composition with Personas feature, but it has to be made by our
great developers.

What do you think?

Cheers,
Paweł

2013/1/27 Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org

 Le 27.01.2013 18:42, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol a écrit :

  Am 27.01.2013 17:40, schrieb Charles-H. Schulz:

 Well. This mail is a bit difficult.


 Even if it is a BoD member's voice. And this is a ponderous voice.



 It's even more difficult in my position. I realize I'm going to upset a
 dozen people here at least. But  I feel it is my duty not to shut up...

 Best,
 Charles.




 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to 
 design+help@global.**libreoffice.orgdesign%2bh...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/**get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-**
 unsubscribe/http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.**documentfoundation.org/**
 Netiquette http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: 
 http://listarchives.**libreoffice.org/global/design/http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-design] Rebranding result

2013-01-27 Thread Italo Vignoli
On 1/27/13 5:40 PM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:

 I am very worried about this choice (again, I'm constraining my comment
 to the splashscreen), I'm worried for our image, I'm worried for the
 impression millions of people are going to get every time they'll start
 LibreOffice.

I am not going to add my comments, but I completely agree with Charles.

 I don't even want to suggest what to do at this point, what process to
 follow, I don't want to choose for the team as it would be disrepectful
 (and this mail is disrespectful enough already) but I can't shut up on
 that one. Please reconsider or do something. It's terrible.

+1 (should I say +100 ?)

-- 
Italo Vignoli - italo.vign...@gmail.com
mob +39.348.5653829 - VoIP 5316...@messagenet.it
skype italovignoli - gtalk italo.vign...@gmail.com

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-design] Rebranding result

2013-01-27 Thread Mirek M.
Hi Charles, Italo,
The links to the proposed artwork are here:
* TDF artwork http://ubuntuone.com/3PVMix5hDrBtqARcYR298r
* Community artwork without ® http://ubuntuone.com/5Egi8UftNSNL3jNwxncC3r
* Community artwork with ® http://ubuntuone.com/5PDYO8aos1BOa8CVId8NS9
* sofficerc http://ubuntuone.com/3lYToGq77OfnItEDKsAhBO
* SVG sources http://ubuntuone.com/25bFNEcUwK8VAJcCK04iRx

Please try it out before making a judgement.

On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Charles-H. Schulz 
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:

 Well. This mail is a bit difficult. I took a look at the design. It IS a
 non standard logo on a white background.
 There are two major issues.
 * the logo is NOT the standard logo. You're using an old one from 2010.


The logo in the proposal comes straight from
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Branding, where it's listed
as a valid option.

That said, we opted for a lighter, if a bit less standard, version of the
logo, as seen in Mateus's proposal.



* I don't have much to say for the startscreen, but honestly... the
 splashscreen is something I could have done myself and I'm a profound idiot
 when it comes to design. This looks bad, unfinished, and I obviously do not
 have the documented rationale for your choice, but it's a bit like any
 other choice would have been better.


A complex design doesn't necessary mean a good design. Here, simple tends
to be better.
And if you look, that's the design ethos of most successful software
companies.
To give examples -- look at Microsoft Word's new splash
screenhttp://better-tablet.com//HLIC/d07e244bfbe53f6531eb17c87114c138.png
.
And while iWork doesn't have a splash, it does have a
boxhttp://www.downeu.net/uploads/posts/2010-07/1279860460_iwork09-box.jpg--
and the front is occupied solely by the logo.

On our social sites, the feedback seems mostly positive.



I am very worried about this choice (again, I'm constraining my comment to
 the splashscreen), I'm worried for our image, I'm worried for the
 impression millions of people are going to get every time they'll start
 LibreOffice.

 I would like to thank you all for your contributions, I know it's not easy
 and we all have lives outside here, but somebody must have gotten really
 tired or something.

 I don't even want to suggest what to do at this point, what process to
 follow, I don't want to choose for the team as it would be disrepectful
 (and this mail is disrespectful enough already) but I can't shut up on that
 one. Please reconsider or do something. It's terrible.


Again, I'd encourage you to try it out before judging.
If you're still firmly opposed to it, we can revert back to the 3.6
branding.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-design] Rebranding result

2013-01-27 Thread Mirek M.
Another option is to ask for Mateus's license statement and incorporate
some elements from his design like the dog ear or the green progress
indicator into Maxim's. The two proposals fit well together, and I feel
this decision would be fair to both Mateus and Maxim.

Please try out the current design and then e-mail me ASAP if I should ask
Mateus for a license statement as well. It'd be good to have the final
designs today, tomorrow latest.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-design] Rebranding result

2013-01-27 Thread Charles-H. Schulz

Hello Mirek,

I have taken a look at the elements below. I do find indeed some 
improvements with respect to the finition, but I'm still profoundly 
worried.

See my other comments inline.

Le 27.01.2013 19:25, Mirek M. a écrit :

Hi Charles, Italo,
The links to the proposed artwork are here:
* TDF artwork http://ubuntuone.com/3PVMix5hDrBtqARcYR298r
* Community artwork without ® 
http://ubuntuone.com/5Egi8UftNSNL3jNwxncC3r
* Community artwork with ® 
http://ubuntuone.com/5PDYO8aos1BOa8CVId8NS9

* sofficerc http://ubuntuone.com/3lYToGq77OfnItEDKsAhBO
* SVG sources http://ubuntuone.com/25bFNEcUwK8VAJcCK04iRx

Please try it out before making a judgement.

On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Charles-H. Schulz 
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:

Well. This mail is a bit difficult. I took a look at the design. It 
IS a

non standard logo on a white background.
There are two major issues.
* the logo is NOT the standard logo. You're using an old one from 
2010.



The logo in the proposal comes straight from
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Branding, where it's 
listed

as a valid option.

That said, we opted for a lighter, if a bit less standard, version of 
the

logo, as seen in Mateus's proposal.





* I don't have much to say for the startscreen, but honestly... the
splashscreen is something I could have done myself and I'm a 
profound idiot
when it comes to design. This looks bad, unfinished, and I obviously 
do not
have the documented rationale for your choice, but it's a bit like 
any

other choice would have been better.



A complex design doesn't necessary mean a good design. Here, simple 
tends

to be better.
And if you look, that's the design ethos of most successful software
companies.
To give examples -- look at Microsoft Word's new splash

screenhttp://better-tablet.com//HLIC/d07e244bfbe53f6531eb17c87114c138.png
.
And while iWork doesn't have a splash, it does have a

boxhttp://www.downeu.net/uploads/posts/2010-07/1279860460_iwork09-box.jpg--
and the front is occupied solely by the logo.

On our social sites, the feedback seems mostly positive.


Indeed, and that feels a bit reassuring.I think I understand what you 
were trying to achieve and I completely agree that a complex design is 
not necessarily a good design. But there might be a disconnect between 
the intellectual approach, the concept if you will, and the final 
result.
My point is this : you can see some contemporary artwork, being 
explained what's the reasonning behind them, even fully enjoy the 
reasonning behind it, and it still sucks. I think we might be in this 
situation :-)


I fundamentally believe we're heading in the wrong direction with this 
splashscreen although the files make it look a tad better than the 
original proposal.





Again, I'd encourage you to try it out before judging.
If you're still firmly opposed to it, we can revert back to the 3.6
branding.


I'll be honest with you, I don't know what we should do. Let me get 
back to you asap.


Thanks a lot for your patience and your work.

Charles.

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-design] Rebranding result

2013-01-27 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Mirek, all,
On 27/01/2013 19:25, Mirek M. wrote:
 Hi Charles, Italo,
 The links to the proposed artwork are here:
 * TDF artwork http://ubuntuone.com/3PVMix5hDrBtqARcYR298r
 * Community artwork without ® http://ubuntuone.com/5Egi8UftNSNL3jNwxncC3r
 * Community artwork with ® http://ubuntuone.com/5PDYO8aos1BOa8CVId8NS9
 * sofficerc http://ubuntuone.com/3lYToGq77OfnItEDKsAhBO
 * SVG sources http://ubuntuone.com/25bFNEcUwK8VAJcCK04iRx
 
 Please try it out before making a judgement.

Thanks a lot for the links. I didn't participate to the communication on
your work, I usually forward everything to the FR list, but localization
has took all my time.

I agree with Italo and Charles that the design is finally less than a
refresh, but hey guys, we all make bugs :)
So to all who participated, don't be disappointed, be like all of us
when we find that finally our hard work has some imperfection that makes
it difficult to accept for others (and be sure that it happens to all of
us more than one time), take a breath and go on!

Where to go from here? Do we cancel the refresh (Pawel, your proposal is
not possible because of feature and l10n freeze), do you think there is
another one that will fit more than the proposed one? (I'm still
struggling with l10n issues so don't have time to look at your links).
Mirek, what would be your position on this?
And again to all, thanks a lot for your work on the design of our
product and project.

Kind regards
Sophie
-- 
Sophie Gautier sophie.gaut...@documentfoundation.org
Tel:+33683901545
Membership  Certification Committee Member - Co-founder
The Document Foundation

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-design] Rebranding result

2013-01-27 Thread Mirek M.
@Charles: Good to hear that you're happier with the tweaked version.

@Sophie: As I said, I could contact Mateus and incorporate his dog ear and
green progress indicator designs.

It sounds as if both of you only looked at the elements in an image viewer.
Please try them in action -- they really do look good, and, what's more,
they feel light (which is good, as it makes the suite feel a bit less
bloated). :)

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-design] Rebranding result

2013-01-27 Thread Italo Vignoli
On 1/27/13 7:25 PM, Mirek M. wrote:

 Again, I'd encourage you to try it out before judging.
 If you're still firmly opposed to it, we can revert back to the 3.6
 branding.

Everything is white, nothing is green. Sorry, I do not like it at all. I
am not a design expert but a decent communication expert, and we have
already had a huge issue in the past when OOo switched from something
colourful to something completely white, and many users complained in a
rather strong way (and I was one of the most vocal). We should improve
the design of 3.6.4, which might be too greenish, by adding shades or
graphic elements, but we should not give up our green colour (which has
a meaning, as green is the colour of freedom in western culture). Sorry
for being probably too negative, because I am a volunteer and I know
myself what it means when your volunteer work is criticized, but I see
this whiteish look as a major issue (and a huge step backwards).

-- 
Italo Vignoli - italo.vign...@gmail.com
mob +39.348.5653829 - VoIP 5316...@messagenet.it
skype italovignoli - gtalk italo.vign...@gmail.com

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-design] Rebranding result

2013-01-27 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Mirek,
On 27/01/2013 20:04, Mirek M. wrote:
 @Charles: Good to hear that you're happier with the tweaked version.
 
 @Sophie: As I said, I could contact Mateus and incorporate his dog ear and
 green progress indicator designs.
 
 It sounds as if both of you only looked at the elements in an image viewer.
 Please try them in action -- they really do look good, and, what's more,
 they feel light (which is good, as it makes the suite feel a bit less
 bloated). :)

I must admit that I don't tried them in situation, but most of the
people commenting on your work will do the same as me (but I'll test it
tomorrow). This is another discussion so I won't clutter this one, but
will come back to it when this issue is closed, you need better
ways/tools to reflect and to be able to communicate on your work.
Kind regards
Sophie
-- 
Sophie Gautier sophie.gaut...@documentfoundation.org
Tel:+33683901545
Membership  Certification Committee Member - Co-founder
The Document Foundation

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-design] Rebranding result

2013-01-27 Thread Mirek M.
Guide for testing the artwork on Linux:
Rename splash.png from the package as intro.png and place it along with
sofficerc, backing_left.png, backing_space.png, and backing_right.png into
your home folder. Then open the Terminal and write the following:
sudo cp intro.png /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/
sudo cp sofficerc /etc/libreoffice/
sudo cp backing_left.png /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/shell/
sudo cp backing_space.png /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/shell/
sudo cp backing_right.png /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/shell/

To answer Italo:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.comwrote:

 On 1/27/13 7:25 PM, Mirek M. wrote:

  Again, I'd encourage you to try it out before judging.
  If you're still firmly opposed to it, we can revert back to the 3.6
  branding.

 Everything is white, nothing is green. Sorry, I do not like it at all. I
 am not a design expert but a decent communication expert, and we have
 already had a huge issue in the past when OOo switched from something
 colourful to something completely white, and many users complained in a
 rather strong way (and I was one of the most vocal). We should improve
 the design of 3.6.4, which might be too greenish, by adding shades or
 graphic elements, but we should not give up our green colour (which has
 a meaning, as green is the colour of freedom in western culture). Sorry
 for being probably too negative, because I am a volunteer and I know
 myself what it means when your volunteer work is criticized, but I see
 this whiteish look as a major issue (and a huge step backwards).


I have to disagree with you there.
Our original splash was predominantly white, and there were no complaints
about it then. When the idea of a green splash was brought up, a sizeable
percentage of our Google+ commenters argued against it:
please not green! - Alberto
Sanchezhttps://plus.google.com/u/0/b/102673546895803839652/107720692751646982324,
+1'd by Fran S, Alessandro Roncone, Jean-Baptiste Sauvage
If one of the green ones is chosen, please add an anti-headache mode
which can turn it into greyscale colours. - Robin Jacobs
I know about the greenish of LibreOffice, but at least a little decrease
of saturation could lead to a less strident ui on those DE that by default
are built around blue, to make an example.
Basically, I really appreciate this design. My point was only related to
the color. - Alessandro Roncone
White is also the predominant color in the Office 2010 splash screen, the
Apache OpenOffice splash, this Office 2013
splashhttp://www.google.com/imgres?hl=ensafe=offtbo=dgbv=2biw=1024bih=464tbm=ischtbnid=DwPafHo3TG3iJM:imgrefurl=http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2012/07/office-2013-microsofts-bid-to-win-the-future/docid=2mKhmJ_z8WIUaMimgurl=http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/o2013-install-launch-640x360.pngw=639h=359ei=Fo0FUb66J-2b1AWkuIG4Cgzoom=1ved=1t:3588,r:5,s:0,i:96iact=rcdur=7sig=117166895286223770585page=1tbnh=168tbnw=300start=0ndsp=6tx=72ty=67,
and almost all of Apple's box designs.

I'm just trying to point out that the situation is not so clear-cut, and
there are advantages to using white.

Also, the new proposal isn't completely devoid of green. Do you think
adding a green dog ear as in Mateus's proposal would help?

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-design] Rebranding result

2013-01-27 Thread Björn Balazs
Hi all,

I haven't taken a look at the actual design, so I do not have an 
opinion on the discussion here. 

What I like is the idea to involve users into defining the future 
direction. 

But I guess we should rethink the way of doing it. I do not believe 
g+ (as I understood) is an appropriate way of doing it / activating 
users. Thus the results are subject of discussion.

I more than happy to help finding / defining better ways to involve 
users in future if there is a larger interest in this topic.

All the best,
Björn



Am Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013, 21:27:43 schrieb Mirek M.:
 Guide for testing the artwork on Linux:
 Rename splash.png from the package as intro.png and place it along 
with
 sofficerc, backing_left.png, backing_space.png, and 
backing_right.png into
 your home folder. Then open the Terminal and write the following:
 sudo cp intro.png /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/
 sudo cp sofficerc /etc/libreoffice/
 sudo cp backing_left.png /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/shell/
 sudo cp backing_space.png /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/shell/
 sudo cp backing_right.png /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/shell/
 
 To answer Italo:
 
 On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Italo Vignoli 
italo.vign...@gmail.comwrote:
  On 1/27/13 7:25 PM, Mirek M. wrote:
   Again, I'd encourage you to try it out before judging.
   If you're still firmly opposed to it, we can revert back to the 
3.6
   branding.
  
  Everything is white, nothing is green. Sorry, I do not like it at 
all. I
  am not a design expert but a decent communication expert, and we 
have
  already had a huge issue in the past when OOo switched from 
something
  colourful to something completely white, and many users 
complained in a
  rather strong way (and I was one of the most vocal). We should 
improve
  the design of 3.6.4, which might be too greenish, by adding 
shades or
  graphic elements, but we should not give up our green colour 
(which has
  a meaning, as green is the colour of freedom in western culture). 
Sorry
  for being probably too negative, because I am a volunteer and I 
know
  myself what it means when your volunteer work is criticized, but 
I see
  this whiteish look as a major issue (and a huge step backwards).
 
 I have to disagree with you there.
 Our original splash was predominantly white, and there were no 
complaints
 about it then. When the idea of a green splash was brought up, a 
sizeable
 percentage of our Google+ commenters argued against it:
 please not green! - Alberto
 
Sanchezhttps://plus.google.com/u/0/b/102673546895803839652/1077206927516469
 82324, +1'd by Fran S, Alessandro Roncone, Jean-Baptiste Sauvage
 If one of the green ones is chosen, please add an anti-headache 
mode
 which can turn it into greyscale colours. - Robin Jacobs
 I know about the greenish of LibreOffice, but at least a little 
decrease
 of saturation could lead to a less strident ui on those DE that by 
default
 are built around blue, to make an example.
 Basically, I really appreciate this design. My point was only 
related to
 the color. - Alessandro Roncone
 White is also the predominant color in the Office 2010 splash 
screen, the
 Apache OpenOffice splash, this Office 2013
 
splashhttp://www.google.com/imgres?hl=ensafe=offtbo=dgbv=2biw=1024bih=
 
464tbm=ischtbnid=DwPafHo3TG3iJM:imgrefurl=http://arstechnica.com/informat
 ion-technology/2012/07/office-2013-microsofts-bid-to-win-the-
future/docid=2
 mKhmJ_z8WIUaMimgurl=http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-
content/uploads/2012/07/o
 2013-install-
launch-640x360.pngw=639h=359ei=Fo0FUb66J-2b1AWkuIG4Cgzoom=1
 
ved=1t:3588,r:5,s:0,i:96iact=rcdur=7sig=117166895286223770585page=1tbn
 h=168tbnw=300start=0ndsp=6tx=72ty=67, and almost all of 
Apple's box
 designs.
 
 I'm just trying to point out that the situation is not so clear-
cut, and
 there are advantages to using white.
 
 Also, the new proposal isn't completely devoid of green. Do you 
think
 adding a green dog ear as in Mateus's proposal would help?
-- 
Dipl.-Psych. Björn Balazs
Business Management  Research
T +49 30 6098548-21 | M +49 179 4541949

User Prompt GmbH | Psychologic IT Expertise 
Grünberger Str. 49, 10245 Berlin | www.user-prompt.com 
HRB 142277 | AG Berlin Charlottenburg | Geschäftsführer Björn Balazs

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted