[Bug 386150] Re: Nautilus file browser toolbar is complicated, redundant, and ugly

2009-07-15 Thread Andrew Conkling
Some upstream action:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42834 (requesting the ability to 
customize the toolbar)
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509660 (moving the Zoom and View As 
controls to the main toolbar, complete with a needs-work patch)

** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #509660
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509660

** Also affects: nautilus via
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509660
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
Nautilus file browser toolbar is complicated, redundant, and ugly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386150
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 338695] Re: low res icons for notifications

2009-05-08 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 04:51, Matthew Paul Thomas
m...@canonical.comwrote:

 This bug needs to be fixed with different code in different programs, so
 it's not really appropriate to have them all in the same bug report.
 This bug report is about Banshee. Bug 360228 is about Pidgin. Please
 report a separate bug about Rhythmbox.


I know it's OT, but isn't that one of the things Launchpad encourages? Don't
get me wrong, I totally agree, but there are plenty of bugs like this that
have multiple, separate projects on them.

-- 
Banshee album art is blurred in notification bubbles
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338695
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 340515] Re: Consumes all CPU, logs a lot of output

2009-03-30 Thread Andrew Conkling
I wouldn't have expected so—with no upstream attention and no noticeable
updates—so I hadn't attempted again, but I just tried right now and it
seems to be fixed. Whatever it was must've been some growing pains.

** Changed in: gnome-session (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Fix Released

-- 
Consumes all CPU, logs a lot of output
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 345316] Re: PLAY_PAUSE_KEY events not routed to notify-osd

2009-03-19 Thread Andrew Conkling
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 343261 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343261

Bug 343261 covers this for notify-osd and various music players,
including Banshee. I'll update the description there to be clear that
Play/Pause are covered, not just track changes.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 343261
   No notification on audio track changes

-- 
PLAY_PAUSE_KEY events not routed to notify-osd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345316
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 343261] Re: No notification on audio changes (Play, Pause, Next, Previous)

2009-03-19 Thread Andrew Conkling
** Summary changed:

- No notification on audio track changes
+ No notification on audio changes (Play, Pause, Next, Previous)

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: notify-osd
  
  I am using notify-osd 0.9.3-0ubuntu1 (with /usr/share/notify_osd folder 
renamed to notify-osd) on Ubuntu Jaunty x64.
- Whenever I use the (correctly working) audio track changes buttons on my 
keyboard, a Microsoft Wireless Multimedia Keyboard 1.1, I do not get any 
notification at all.
- Notifications are working correctly for everything else (except for no icon 
on new mail notification - should I report it?).
+ Whenever I use the (correctly working) multimedia keys on my keyboard, a 
Microsoft Wireless Multimedia Keyboard 1.1, I do not get any notification at 
all.
+ Play, Pause, Next, and Previous are all affected.
+ Notifications are working correctly for everything else.

-- 
No notification on audio changes (Play, Pause, Next, Previous)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 343261] Re: No notification on audio changes (Play, Pause, Next, Previous)

2009-03-19 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:33, Nicolò Chieffo
nicolo.chie...@gmail.comwrote:

 The next and previous notifications are shown even if the media player
 is not started, so it's not their fault. someone suggested gnome-
 settings-daemon


You'll see in the master bug that notify-osd was already marked Invalid. You
should discuss there the possibility of adding a gnome-settings-daemon; I
can't speak to that.

-- 
No notification on audio changes (Play, Pause, Next, Previous)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 59674] Re: gswitchit crash when logging in to GNOME

2009-03-12 Thread Andrew Conkling
The upstream link should have been updated as per Sebastian in comment
12. Updating now, even though it seems obsolete. :)

** Changed in: gnome-applets
 Bugwatch: GNOME Bug Tracker #355074 = GNOME Bug Tracker #370673
   Status: Invalid = Unknown

-- 
gswitchit crash when logging in to GNOME
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59674
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 340515] Re: Consumes all CPU, logs a lot of output

2009-03-11 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 04:40, Chris Coulson
chrisccoul...@googlemail.comwrote:

 Yes, if you manually start vino-server then enable it in Remote Desktop
 Preferences afterwards, this sets the AutostartCondition to true and
 causes gnome-session to start another instance. This instance
 immediately exits though because there is already one running, which
 triggers this endless cycle of restarts you're seeing.


Not quite what happened. I had started vino-server manually, then quit it.
Then, separately, I re-enabled the automatic support that I had initially
disabled (via gconftool).

So: when starting vino manually, it works fine; when started through Remote
Desktop/gconf, it works but uses all the CPU.

-- 
Consumes all CPU, logs a lot of output
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 340515] Re: Consumes all CPU, logs a lot of output

2009-03-11 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 17:24, Chris Coulson
chrisccoul...@googlemail.comwrote:

 Are you sure that the first instance actually quit before you tried to
 enable the automatic loading via gconf?


Yes, quite sure. `ps -A | grep vino` returns nothing, but then immediately
enabling vino via gconf makes the CPU jump to 100%.

Thanks for filing upstream; I'll add my comment there also.

-- 
Consumes all CPU, logs a lot of output
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 340515] [NEW] Consumes all CPU, logs a lot of output

2009-03-10 Thread Andrew Conkling
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-session

Release of Ubuntu: 9.04
Package Version: 2.25.92-0ubuntu1

gnome-session has been consuming all my CPU for about a week, and
recently I've noticed that my daemon.log and syslog files are over 1 GB
in a day.

I'm not sure how to troubleshoot this, but I am attaching the most
recent 1000 lines of each log file.

** Affects: gnome-session (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Consumes all CPU, logs a lot of output
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 340515] Re: Consumes all CPU, logs a lot of output

2009-03-10 Thread Andrew Conkling

** Attachment added: daemon.log
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23722231/daemon.log

-- 
Consumes all CPU, logs a lot of output
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 340515] Re: Consumes all CPU, logs a lot of output

2009-03-10 Thread Andrew Conkling

** Attachment added: syslog
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23722234/syslog

-- 
Consumes all CPU, logs a lot of output
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 340515] Re: Consumes all CPU, logs a lot of output

2009-03-10 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 14:29, Chris Coulson
chrisccoul...@googlemail.comwrote:

 Thank you for your bug report. First of all, could you disable vino-
 server from autostarting by running gconftool-2 --set --type=bool
 /desktop/gnome/remote_access/enabled false, then log out and back in
 again. Once you have done this, could you please run /usr/lib/vino
 /vino-server from a terminal and paste any output that you see (I want
 to see if it's crashing first)


Thanks for the fast response! I am working remotely right now (only have VNC
access to my computer), so I couldn't do that at the moment, but does that
perhaps answer the question of whether vino is crashing? I have been using
it throughout the day to view my desktop (indeed, that's how I attached the
logs to this bug) so I know it's at least partially working. :)

That said, I'll send along any output as soon as I can.

-- 
Consumes all CPU, logs a lot of output
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 340515] Re: Consumes all CPU, logs a lot of output

2009-03-10 Thread Andrew Conkling
Okay, first of all, deactivating vino immediately brought my CPU back to
normal. So that's good; we know what caused the problem. :)

Here's the output from vino-server:
10/03/2009 21:36:07 Autoprobing TCP port in (all) network interface
10/03/2009 21:36:07 Listening IPv{4,6}://*:5900
10/03/2009 21:36:07 Autoprobing selected port 5900
10/03/2009 21:36:07 Advertising security type: 'TLS' (18)
10/03/2009 21:36:07 Advertising authentication type: 'VNC Authentication' (2)
10/03/2009 21:36:07 Advertising security type: 'VNC Authentication' (2)
10/03/2009 21:37:43 [IPv6] Got connection from client Drewbuntu
10/03/2009 21:37:43   other clients:

It did not crash and, as you can see, I connected through Vinagre/Remote
Desktop Viewer.

I re-enabled vino in the Remote Desktop preferences and immediately the
CPU jumped. What's weird is that gconfd shows a pretty steady CPU usage;
gnome-session is around 2-3%, gconfd is at 1%. Related?

** Changed in: gnome-session (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = New

-- 
Consumes all CPU, logs a lot of output
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 340515] Re: Consumes all CPU, logs a lot of output

2009-03-10 Thread Andrew Conkling
Also, I'm assuming this is more a vino bug than a gnome-session one, but
I won't change the product as I'm not sure of that.

-- 
Consumes all CPU, logs a lot of output
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 306591] Re: Locale settings in shell initialization not used by GNOME session

2009-03-03 Thread Andrew Conkling
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #573950
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573950

** Also affects: gnome-settings-daemon via
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573950
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
Locale settings in shell initialization not used by GNOME session
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306591
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to meta-gnome2 in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 306591] Re: Locale settings in shell initialization not used by GNOME session

2009-02-11 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 13:46, Jonathan Marsden
jmars...@fastmail.fmwrote:

 Set a language at the gdm screen, and when prompted, tell it to make
 this new language/locale the default for your user, and it adds
 information to that effect to your ~/.dmrc  Then, next time that user
 logs in, they get that chosen language/locale.  Such a user will find
 that their shell locale is correct, too, when they open up a terminal
 window.  Job done.  User does not need to care where the info is stored
 or how it works.  User never edits a ~/.anything file!  It just works.


Right, the problem is when you want to mix and match locales. In my
situation, I simply want to change my time to 24-hour and my first weekday
to Monday, but retain everything else in en_US. Since GNOME does not offer
any way to do this, shell environment variables are the only way I know how
to do this.

Do you really truly need more that this?  Is there really a bug here?
 If so, what exactly is the bug?


That I cannot customize my locale settings within a language (specifically
changing the time mode and first weekday, but I could not change any other
setting either).


 If you have a question (as opposed to a bug), then you could try using
 LaunchPad Answers to ask it, and see if you get a solid answer to it
 there.  It might be good to phrase the question in terms of the user
 requirement how do I achieve result X, rather than in terms of the
 method how do I get GNOME to read locale settings from shell
 initialization file Y, for best results.


I'm inclined to think there's a bug (as I mentioned above) mainly because no
one seems to know how to do this in GNOME. Missing/undiscoverable
functionality is still a bug.

But fair enough; I should exhaust all resources:
https://answers.launchpad.net/gnome-common/+question/60699

Interestingly, I found this question, which doesn't really shed any light at
all: https://answers.launchpad.net/gnome-common/+question/6311

If no further information comes to light in the next 48 hours, I will report
this upstream and work with other GNOME BugSquad members to triage it.

-- 
Locale settings in shell initialization not used by GNOME session
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306591
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to meta-gnome2 in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 306591] Re: Locale settings in shell initialization not used by GNOME session

2009-02-08 Thread Andrew Conkling
** Summary changed:

- Locale settings not used by GNOME session
+ Locale settings in shell initialization not used by GNOME session

-- 
Locale settings in shell initialization not used by GNOME session
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306591
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to meta-gnome2 in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 306591] Re: Locale settings not used by GNOME session

2009-02-08 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 00:39, Jonathan Marsden jmars...@fastmail.fm
wrote:

 My change to the summary line was trying (apparently inadequately, since
 you undid it!) to suggest that the issue is not really locale settings
 not respected by Gnome.  Locale settings most definitely *are*
 respected by Gnome, when they are set in /etc/environment, or when set
 from the gdm login screen.

 Rephrasing a bit: the issue being reported is (as I understand it[...]):
 Gnome does not use locale settings which are set
 in the user's shell initialization file.


Sorry! I've updated the status to reflect that. I was simply trying to say
that the problem is not Bash-specific. But I see your point


 The question then becomes: Should Gnome in fact examine and use such
 settings, since Gnome does not itself necessarily use any per-session
 shell at all!  Why would Gnome be expected to look in a user's shell
 initialization file?  Is there documentation out there that says it
 should or will do so?


Good question. I've simply been assuming, intuitively, that my shell
initialization is where I put all environment variables, commands to be run
on login, etc.

(A quick test showed that my `echo foobar  Desktop/filename` that I
added to ~/.zshrc was run once when logging into Gnome, so I don't think my
assumption is too far off? That discovery is confusing.)

I am not sure there is really
 much of a case for saying that Gnome *should* be parsing shell
 initialization files to look for locale settings -- is there?  I'm open
 to hearing the argument that it should really do that, but trying to
 look at this from the user's viewpoint, I don't (yet?) see why it
 should.


I think the point isn't that Gnome should look for locale settings, but that
it should parse anything in the shell's initialization file once and only
once.


 The shell respects the locale settings set in the global environment and
 its initialization file(s); Gnome respects the locale settings in the
 global environment and it is own initialization files.  (For example,
 have you considered setting locale-related variables in ~/.xsession, if
 you want to explore this kind of thing?  Maybe in ~/.dmrc ??)


No, I haven't tried any of this; I've researched the topic a half dozen
times over the years and have found scant documentation/explanation. I even
brought it up on the seemingly ignored gnome-list—and, of course, got no
answers:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-list/2008-September/msg3.html.

Logically, if you are using a GUI, then you set its locale at GUI
 session startup, just as you would set a shell's locale at shell
 startup.  Each has a different way to specify its initial settings
 (though of course both respect the global environment).

 Does this make sense?


Yes, I suppose. But that leaves the question: where do I put environment
variables that apply to me, i.e. in a graphical setting and a terminal
one? /etc/environment is not appropriate (I'm only changing the locale
settings for my username) and I've never heard about anything else other
than what you mention above. :) If you have any ideas, I'd love to hear
them!

I'm reopening this, but I understand why you set it to Incomplete for the
time being. I'm still convinced *something* is not clear, but it could
easily be my understanding of login/profile/variable initialization. But if
this isn't a bug, I'd think there should be some documentation somewhere
explaining why (not).

-- 
Locale settings in shell initialization not used by GNOME session
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306591
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to meta-gnome2 in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 306591] Re: Locale settings in shell initialization not used by GNOME session

2009-02-08 Thread Andrew Conkling
** Changed in: meta-gnome2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = New

-- 
Locale settings in shell initialization not used by GNOME session
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306591
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to meta-gnome2 in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 306591] Re: Locale settings not used by GNOME session

2009-02-07 Thread Andrew Conkling
Changed summary back. To be clear, I am using ZSH as my shell, not Bash;
this problem is not Bash-specific.

** Summary changed:

- Locale settings in ~/.bashrc not used by GNOME session
+ Locale settings not used by GNOME session

-- 
Locale settings not used by GNOME session
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306591
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to meta-gnome2 in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 306591] Re: Locale settings not used by GNOME session

2009-02-07 Thread Andrew Conkling
Jonathan, do you have any idea what may be at fault here? I'm interested
in filing this upstream but I'm not sure which Gnome package to target.

-- 
Locale settings not used by GNOME session
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306591
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to meta-gnome2 in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 286544] Re: The program 'f-spot' received an X Window System error

2009-01-22 Thread Andrew Conkling
** Changed in: f-spot (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
The program 'f-spot' received an X Window System error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286544
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 300440] Re: Open/Save dialog boxes sometimes don't expand

2009-01-21 Thread Andrew Conkling
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 75324 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75324

How could this be a duplicate of a bug that predates Hardy? I think
there are separate issues here, and this one seems to be a regression.

Deed is done, and that bug seems to account for this issue, but I don't
think it was a duplicate in the first place.

-- 
Open/Save dialog boxes sometimes don't expand
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300440
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 35876] Re: 'Downloading package information' and 'building dependency tree' progress dialogs steal focus

2008-12-11 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Loye Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Obviously, it's not a small, simple fix.

 Contrary to Sarah's assertion, setting  focus_on_map to false in
 every instance it appears in update-manager *fixes* update-manager:
 Update-manager ceases to steal focus when that's done.


So could you provide a patch so others can test? Instructions here:
https://help.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/packagingguide/C/ubuntu-sync.html

-- 
'Downloading package information' and 'building dependency tree' progress 
dialogs steal focus
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35876
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 306591] [NEW] Locale settings not respected in GNOME session

2008-12-09 Thread Andrew Conkling
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome

(Sorry about the package, not sure if this would be gnome-settings-
daemon or something else?)

Originally posted on the forums:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=6287235.

I want to manually control my LC_TIME settings independent of my LANG,
so I...

1. Added 'export LC_TIME=en_DK.UTF-8' (sans quotes) to my ~/.bashrc and my 
~/.zshrc. (I use ZSH as my shell, but it didn't work if I switched to Bash 
either.)
2. Start an application from GNOME Terminal or Run (e.g. `zenity --calendar`, 
`date`): locale setting is used.
3. Start an application from the GNOME Panel, look at the Panel's date applet, 
etc.: locale setting is not used.

Workaround: append 'LC_TIME=en_DK.UTF-8' (sans quotes) to
/etc/environment, and the setting is used by all applications, no matter
how they are launched. (Thanks to Brucevdk on the forum for the tip!)

So it would seem that user-set locale settings are not being picked up
by GNOME properly.

I'm using Ubuntu 8.10 with GNOME 2.24 (gnome-settings-daemon 2.24.0-0ubuntu3.3).
(This is possibly related to bug 68938, but that's old and closed, so I'm 
creating this new one rather than resurrecting that one.)

** Affects: meta-gnome2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Locale settings not respected in GNOME session
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306591
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to meta-gnome2 in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 187383] Re: System monitor causes Xorg to consume 100% CPU

2008-12-08 Thread Andrew Conkling
** Changed in: gnome-system-monitor
 Bugwatch: Debian Bug tracker #472777 = GNOME Bug Tracker #507797

-- 
System monitor causes Xorg to consume 100% CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187383
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 187383] Re: System monitor causes Xorg to consume 100% CPU

2008-12-08 Thread Andrew Conkling
** Also affects: gnome-system-monitor (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=472777
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
System monitor causes Xorg to consume 100% CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187383
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 286544] Re: The program 'f-spot' received an X Window System error

2008-12-02 Thread Andrew Conkling
I also use the ATI driver; that seems to be a common factor. (No Desktop
Effects for me.)

** Changed in: f-spot (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = New

-- 
The program 'f-spot' received an X Window System error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286544
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to f-spot in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 35876] Re: 'Downloading package information' and 'building dependency tree' progress dialogs steal focus

2008-12-02 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Loye Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 BTW, the problem isn't metacity. The problem is that update-manager
 should not ask for focus in the first place. This is a problem that
 has been solved over and over again in other applications.


This is known already. See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/35876/comments/31and
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/35876/comments/33.

-- 
'Downloading package information' and 'building dependency tree' progress 
dialogs steal focus
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35876
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 178303] Re: f-spot 2 picasaweb failed to upload

2008-11-17 Thread Andrew Conkling
This bug was fixed upstream in June, which means it should be part of
8.10. Could anyone who experienced this problem test in 8.10/Intrepid
and post back the details? Thanks!

** Changed in: f-spot (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Incomplete

-- 
f-spot 2 picasaweb failed to upload
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178303
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 287748] Re: Nereid.exe crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-10-24 Thread Andrew Conkling
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 287482 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287482

srm, thanks for that information!

-- 
Nereid.exe crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287748
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gstreamer0.10 in ubuntu (via bug
287482).

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 283437] Re: Banshee segfaults with GStreamer error

2008-10-22 Thread Andrew Conkling
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 279800 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279800

Changed duplicate marking to reflect older bug with more discussion.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 279800
   GStreamer update (7-Oct-2008, Intrepid) causes Banshee crash

-- 
Banshee segfaults with GStreamer error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283437
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gstreamer0.10 in ubuntu (via bug
279800).

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 279800] Re: GStreamer update (7-Oct-2008, Intrepid) causes Banshee crash

2008-10-22 Thread Andrew Conkling
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 283437
   Banshee segfaults with GStreamer error

-- 
GStreamer update (7-Oct-2008, Intrepid) causes Banshee crash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279800
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gstreamer0.10 in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 283437] Re: Banshee segfaults with GStreamer error

2008-10-22 Thread Andrew Conkling
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 287482 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287482

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 279800
   GStreamer update (7-Oct-2008, Intrepid) causes Banshee crash

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 287482
   Sync latest GStreamer packages

-- 
Banshee segfaults with GStreamer error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283437
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gstreamer0.10 in ubuntu (via bug
287482).

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 279800] Re: GStreamer update (7-Oct-2008, Intrepid) causes Banshee crash

2008-10-22 Thread Andrew Conkling
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 287482 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287482

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 287482
   Sync latest GStreamer packages

-- 
GStreamer update (7-Oct-2008, Intrepid) causes Banshee crash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279800
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gstreamer0.10 in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 286544] [NEW] The program 'f-spot' received an X Window System error

2008-10-20 Thread Andrew Conkling
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: f-spot

At the moment I can't open F-Spot at all. Same ultimate error if I move
my ~/.gnome2/f-spot folder.

andrew:~ f-spot --debug -v Desktop/virus.png
** Running f-spot in Debug Mode **
** Running Mono with --debug   **
[Info  14:05:22.563] Initializing DBus
[Debug 14:05:22.804] DBusInitialization took 0.195818s
[Info  14:05:22.805] Initializing Mono.Addins
[Debug 14:05:23.164] Mono.Addins Initialization took 0.359255s
[Info  14:05:23.179] Starting new FSpot server
uri = file:///home/andrew/Desktop/virus.png
The program 'f-spot' received an X Window System error.
This probably reflects a bug in the program.
The error was 'BadRequest (invalid request code or no such operation)'.
  (Details: serial 436 error_code 1 request_code 143 minor_code 19)
  (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously;
   that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it.
   To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line
   option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful
   backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.)

andrew:~ f-spot --debug
** Running f-spot in Debug Mode **
** Running Mono with --debug   **
[Info  14:10:30.604] Initializing DBus
[Debug 14:10:30.844] DBusInitialization took 0.218779s
[Info  14:10:30.844] Initializing Mono.Addins
[Debug 14:10:31.200] Mono.Addins Initialization took 0.3552s
[Info  14:10:31.214] Starting new FSpot server
[Debug 14:10:31.745] Db Initialization took 0.418179s
[Debug 14:10:32.606] QueryToTemp took 0.102026s : SELECT id, time, uri, 
description, roll_id, default_version_id, rating, md5_sum FROM photos  ORDER BY 
 time DESC
[Debug 14:10:33.033] PhotosPerMonth took 0.144338s
[Debug 14:10:33.036] TimeAdaptor REAL Reload took 0.356263s
[Debug 14:10:33.143] Query took 0.030657s : SELECT * FROM photoquery_temp_0 
LIMIT 100 OFFSET 0
The program 'f-spot' received an X Window System error.
This probably reflects a bug in the program.
The error was 'BadRequest (invalid request code or no such operation)'.
  (Details: serial 332 error_code 1 request_code 143 minor_code 19)
  (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously;
   that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it.
   To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line
   option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful
   backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.)

** Affects: f-spot (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
The program 'f-spot' received an X Window System error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286544
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to f-spot in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 286544] Re: The program 'f-spot' received an X Window System error

2008-10-20 Thread Andrew Conkling
** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: f-spot
  
  At the moment I can't open F-Spot at all. Same ultimate error if I move
  my ~/.gnome2/f-spot folder.
+ 
+ Version: 0.5.0.3-0ubuntu1
  
  andrew:~ f-spot --debug -v Desktop/virus.png
  ** Running f-spot in Debug Mode **
  ** Running Mono with --debug   **
  [Info  14:05:22.563] Initializing DBus
  [Debug 14:05:22.804] DBusInitialization took 0.195818s
  [Info  14:05:22.805] Initializing Mono.Addins
  [Debug 14:05:23.164] Mono.Addins Initialization took 0.359255s
  [Info  14:05:23.179] Starting new FSpot server
  uri = file:///home/andrew/Desktop/virus.png
  The program 'f-spot' received an X Window System error.
  This probably reflects a bug in the program.
  The error was 'BadRequest (invalid request code or no such operation)'.
(Details: serial 436 error_code 1 request_code 143 minor_code 19)
(Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously;
 that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it.
 To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line
 option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful
 backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.)
  
  andrew:~ f-spot --debug
  ** Running f-spot in Debug Mode **
  ** Running Mono with --debug   **
  [Info  14:10:30.604] Initializing DBus
  [Debug 14:10:30.844] DBusInitialization took 0.218779s
  [Info  14:10:30.844] Initializing Mono.Addins
  [Debug 14:10:31.200] Mono.Addins Initialization took 0.3552s
  [Info  14:10:31.214] Starting new FSpot server
  [Debug 14:10:31.745] Db Initialization took 0.418179s
  [Debug 14:10:32.606] QueryToTemp took 0.102026s : SELECT id, time, uri, 
description, roll_id, default_version_id, rating, md5_sum FROM photos  ORDER BY 
 time DESC
  [Debug 14:10:33.033] PhotosPerMonth took 0.144338s
  [Debug 14:10:33.036] TimeAdaptor REAL Reload took 0.356263s
  [Debug 14:10:33.143] Query took 0.030657s : SELECT * FROM photoquery_temp_0 
LIMIT 100 OFFSET 0
  The program 'f-spot' received an X Window System error.
  This probably reflects a bug in the program.
  The error was 'BadRequest (invalid request code or no such operation)'.
(Details: serial 332 error_code 1 request_code 143 minor_code 19)
(Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously;
 that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it.
 To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line
 option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful
 backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.)

-- 
The program 'f-spot' received an X Window System error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286544
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to f-spot in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 189335] Re: f-spot.exe crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-10-10 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Pedro Villavicencio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 traces are not good, may you run f-spot as: f-spot --debug  f-spot-
 debug.txt perform the operation to make it crash and after that upload
 that file as an attachment to this report?


Did you see mine on bug 267628?

-- 
f-spot.exe crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189335
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 271637] Re: gvfsd-trash crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_prepare()

2008-09-24 Thread Andrew Conkling
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 252174 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252174

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:11 AM, jmor9651 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 252174 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252174

 Hello !  What ever this error is it does not seem to cause any problems
 only
 see the error on boot.

 Should i turn off the error report app ?


No. You're using a development version of Ubuntu, so any bugs should
definitely be reported to Launchpad. If they are annoying you, perhaps you
should revert back to a stable version of Ubuntu.

-- 
Andrew Conkling
http://andrewski.net

-- 
gvfsd-trash crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_prepare()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271637
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 252174] Re: gvfsd-trash crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch()

2008-09-22 Thread Andrew Conkling
This bug has been triaged. Please be aware that there is no additional value in 
further confirming the bug. You can show your support for the bug by 
subscribing to the bug. There is a bunch of helpful documentation about how to 
optimize your time spent on bugs at:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/BestPractices
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures

-- 
gvfsd-trash crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252174
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 189335] Re: f-spot.exe crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-09-10 Thread Andrew Conkling
Reopening and confirming. Better stacktraces were uploaded to bug 264537
and bug 267628, but they were removed by Apport. How do I go about
getting the information uploaded now?

** Changed in: f-spot (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = Confirmed

-- 
f-spot.exe crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189335
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 267628] Re: f-spot.exe crashed with SIGSEGV in _dl_close()

2008-09-07 Thread Andrew Conkling
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 189335 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189335

Can bug 189335 be made public? I'm coming up against a duplicate and I'd
like to examine it more closely.

Anyone with access to it can change the secrecy:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/f-spot/+bug/189335/+secrecy.

-- 
f-spot.exe crashed with SIGSEGV in _dl_close()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267628
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to f-spot in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 252174] Re: gvfsd-trash crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch()

2008-08-27 Thread Andrew Conkling
Bruce, please file a new bug on that; this report is for a specific issue
related to gvfsd-trash.

-- 
gvfsd-trash crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252174
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 194505] Re: Clock applet doesn't load when Google Calendar is used in Evolution

2008-06-26 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:44, Mike Basinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Was patched upstream, any change if getting this fix in Hardy?


It's not fixed in GNOME yet; the patch was just submitted, but has not been
reviewed or committed yet, right?


** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15629273/unnamed

-- 
Clock applet doesn't load when Google Calendar is used in Evolution
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194505
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 238212] Re: F-spot crashes when uploading to picasaweb

2008-06-10 Thread Andrew Conkling
Can you try moving your ~/.gnome2/f-spot folder somewhere else (maybe
your Desktop, for example) and then starting a fresh copy of F-Spot?
Also, can you make sure all other extensions are turned off?

** Changed in: f-spot (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Incomplete

-- 
F-spot crashes when uploading to picasaweb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238212
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to f-spot in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 238212] Re: F-spot crashes when uploading to picasaweb

2008-06-10 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:34, tiefflieger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Happened to me, too (sorry for my duplicate bug entry), but maybe my
 tries to open f-spot via console give additional hints for tracking down
 the problem...?


Don't worry about the duplicate.

As for terminal output, some was already posted, but it (and yours) would be
better if you could install debugging packages as outlined here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash. Seems like debugging output
is missing in both cases. (As an aside, I wonder too if these might be
separate bugs—the output isn't exactly the same at the time of the crash—but
it would be easier to tell with debugging output.)

** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15176586/unnamed

-- 
F-spot crashes when uploading to picasaweb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238212
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to f-spot in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 178303] Re: f-spot 2 picasaweb failed to upload

2008-06-09 Thread Andrew Conkling
Is anyone still having this problem?

** Changed in: f-spot (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Incomplete

-- 
f-spot 2 picasaweb failed to upload
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178303
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to f-spot in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 187383] Re: System monitor causes Xorg to consume 100% CPU

2008-05-20 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:51 PM, cutlerite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 However, even when I don't have a video card installed, I still
 experience slowness.


...and a decided lack of a screen? You will always have some sort of video
card installed.

And yes, Christopher, the problem with the new smooth graphs is likely not
caused by g-s-m itself, but probably by the cairo layer it's using to create
the graphs. Not much to be done about it here, IMO. I tried cleaning these
bugs up a while ago, but no one would have it.


** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14626230/unnamed

-- 
System monitor causes Xorg to consume 100% CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187383
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 80755] Re: extracting doesn't work right when the location entry is displayed

2008-05-07 Thread Andrew Conkling
The problem is a general one in GTK+'s FileChooser, which File Roller is
using in the Extract dialog. The bug is already known upstream:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402349.

** Changed in: fileroller
   Importance: Unknown = Undecided
 Bugwatch: GNOME Bug Tracker #403985 = None

** Changed in: fileroller
   Status: New = Invalid

** Also affects: libgtk via
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402349
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
extracting doesn't work right when the location entry is displayed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80755
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 203527] Re: Clicking on clock applet hangs gnome-panel

2008-04-30 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Andrea Grandi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Sebastien: I've enabled hardy-proposed, installed all the updates
 available and rebooted my Ubuntu. I still have that bug: gnome-panel
 keeps freezing.


You haven't mentioned this before, but are you using a Google Calendar in
Evolution?


** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14048270/unnamed

-- 
Clicking on clock applet hangs gnome-panel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 203527] Re: Clicking on clock applet hangs gnome-panel

2008-04-30 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Andrea Grandi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Yes, I do! Is this a problem?


No, not a problem, just a different issue. See the above comments, namely
this one:

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 the google calendar issue is bug #194505


** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14050764/unnamed

-- 
Clicking on clock applet hangs gnome-panel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 45518] Re: Doesn't support gapless playback

2008-04-27 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Endolith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Can the crossfading backend be enabled by default for Rhythmbox?


Doubtful. The Rhythmbox developers know of a few issues that would prevent
it from being stable enough for default use. You could investigate upstream
on the mailing list or via a bug report to see if they'd consider it though.


** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13965548/unnamed

-- 
Doesn't support gapless playback
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45518
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 187383] Re: System monitor causes Xorg to consume 100% CPU

2008-04-24 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Reshey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have the same problem. Around 100 % cpu usage and unresponsive when
 using system monitor. Terminal and top works fine.


This was just fixed upstream and hasn't been released in Ubuntu yet. Please
subscribe to the bug and keep posted; there will be an automatic message
sent when the updated package is released.


** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13859974/unnamed

-- 
System monitor causes Xorg to consume 100% CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187383
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 187383] Re: System monitor causes Xorg to consume 100% CPU

2008-04-20 Thread Andrew Conkling
schiebe, flyingian, others: See Sebastian's note on comment 36:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-monitor/+bug/187383/comments/36
.


** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13591370/unnamed

-- 
System monitor causes Xorg to consume 100% CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187383
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 155164] Re: failed to connect to socket /tmp/dbus-XstthmKyBI: Connection refused

2008-04-12 Thread Andrew Conkling
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 84876 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84876

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 84876, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you
can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
the other report. Feel free to continue to report any other bugs you may
find.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 84876
   Gnome settings manager error to start desktop

-- 
failed to connect to socket /tmp/dbus-XstthmKyBI: Connection refused
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155164
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee (via bug 84876).

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 84876] Re: Gnome settings manager error to start desktop

2008-04-12 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 5:03 AM, Andrea Ratto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Looks like a synchronization problem to me. Did anyone have this on a
 single core machine?


Yeah.

Also found a dupe:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/155164


Thanks, I marked it as such.


** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13380022/unnamed

-- 
Gnome settings manager error to start desktop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84876
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 85776] Re: [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV onpackage installation, valgrind log required

2008-04-11 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 5:24 AM, jhmac77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 unsubscribe  sent back  return to sender


I believe you're looking for this?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-panel/+bug/85776/+subscribe


** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13354523/unnamed

-- 
[apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV on package installation, valgrind log 
required
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85776
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 203527] Re: Clicking on clock applet hangs gnome-panel

2008-04-10 Thread Andrew Conkling
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 151227
   Left-clicking clock applet hangs gnome-panel

-- 
Clicking on clock applet hangs gnome-panel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 151227] Re: Left-clicking clock applet hangs gnome-panel

2008-04-10 Thread Andrew Conkling
This bug has so little information and isn't reproducible in any one way (at 
least based on the reporter's description, which mentions Gutsy not Hardy like 
bug 203527) that I don't think it's worth making the master bug, even though 
it's older. There seem to be a few issues going on, and the Google Calendar one 
is already reported in bug 194505, and the other report was bug 191497.
Remarking as Invalid and removing upstream report. The other bugs still open 
cover all the cases and upstream bugs we already have.

** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Invalid

** Changed in: gnome-panel
   Importance: Unknown = Undecided
 Bugwatch: GNOME Bug Tracker #525198 = None
   Status: Unknown = New

** Changed in: gnome-panel
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
Left-clicking clock applet hangs gnome-panel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151227
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 203527] Re: Clicking on clock applet hangs gnome-panel

2008-04-10 Thread Andrew Conkling
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 194505 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194505

 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 194505, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you
can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
the other report. Feel free to continue to report any other bugs you may
find.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 194505
   Clock applet doesn't load when Google Calendar is used in Evolution

-- 
Clicking on clock applet hangs gnome-panel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 85776] Re: [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV on package installation, valgrind log required

2008-04-10 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Scott Wegner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 After looking into the stack-trace and such, it looks
 to be a duplicate of bug #214079, which already has a reported fix.  Let
 me know if you would like to report a new bug anyway, and I can.


When in doubt, do, and Apport will automatically mark it as a duplicate once
it retraces it. I'd say do it, err on the side of redundancy. :)


** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13345325/unnamed

-- 
[apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV on package installation, valgrind log 
required
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85776
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 85776] Re: [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV on package installation, valgrind log required

2008-04-10 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Andrew Conkling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 When in doubt, do, and Apport will automatically mark it as a duplicate
 once it retraces it. I'd say do it, err on the side of redundancy. :)


Especially since bug 214079 seems to be missing a valid backtrace.


** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13345327/unnamed

-- 
[apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV on package installation, valgrind log 
required
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85776
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 85776] Re: [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV on packageinstallation, valgrind log required

2008-04-09 Thread Andrew Conkling
Yeah, it's pretty sporadic, hard to reproduce. You can find old crash
reports in /var/crash (you can navigate to there in a file browser
window.) Simply double-click on one and it will be processed. (Also,
I've found that old crash reports do not get re-processed if the crash
report sits in there, so delete any that you are trying to reproduce,
e.g. when trying to retrace after installing debug packages.

Let me know if you need any more help.


--Original Message--
From: Scott Wegner
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReplyTo: Bug 85776
Sent: Apr 9, 2008 09:52
Subject: [Bug 85776] Re: [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV on 
packageinstallation, valgrind log required

Hmmm, I would love to, if there is there some way to get to old crash
reports in Apport?  Although, I also haven't experienced this bug since
I rebooted + some more updates this morning.

-- 
[apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV on package installation, valgrind log 
required
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85776
You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
of the bug.

-- 
[apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV on package installation, valgrind log 
required
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85776
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 213863] Comments

2008-04-08 Thread Andrew Conkling
Everyone, this bug is fixed. Update Synaptic and install 0.1.19. (If
it's not available yet, please wait a few hours for it.) Comments about
workarounds are not necessary anymore, unless you're having a different
problem (in which case you should file a new bug report). And there's no
need to confirm that the fix worked; it's a fix, that's how this works.

-- 
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/lpi-bug.png', which is 
also in package liblaunchpad-integration0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213863
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to launchpad-integration in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 213951] Re: package liblaunchpad-integration1 None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/liblaunchpad-integration1.list] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16

2008-04-08 Thread Andrew Conkling
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 213863 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213863

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Steve Illgen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 213863 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213863

 I did the same workaround as emme suggested. It works.


Take a look at the master bug and you'll see this has been fixed. Not a
workaround, but fixed. Simply update your repositories and upgrade to 0.1.19
and you're set.


** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13255121/unnamed

-- 
package liblaunchpad-integration1 None [modified: 
/var/lib/dpkg/info/liblaunchpad-integration1.list] failed to install/upgrade: 
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/lpi-bug.png', which is 
also in package liblaunchpad-integration0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213951
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to launchpad-integration in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 213919] Re: package liblaunchpad-integration1 None [modified:/var/lib/dpkg/info/liblaunchpad-integration1.list] failed toinstall/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de??/usr/share/icons/hicolo

2008-04-08 Thread Andrew Conkling
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 213863 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213863

Yeah, definitely an annoying bug, but the fix has already been released.
If you don't have 0.1.19 in your updates yet, be sure to refresh and/or
switch your repositories to the main servers.


-Original Message-
From: KevinLange [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:13:21 
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bug 213919] Re: package liblaunchpad-integration1 None [modified:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/liblaunchpad-integration1.list] failed to
install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de
??/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/lpi-bug.png??,
qui appartient aussi au paquet liblaunchpad-integration0


*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 213863 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213863

I can confirm that it conflicts, it should just completely replace it.
It's keeping me from being able to install anything new, which is really
getting on my nerves.

-- 
package liblaunchpad-integration1 None [modified: 
/var/lib/dpkg/info/liblaunchpad-integration1.list] failed to install/upgrade: 
tentative de remplacement de 
??/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/lpi-bug.png??, qui appartient aussi au 
paquet liblaunchpad-integration0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213919
You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
of the bug (via bug 213863).

-- 
package liblaunchpad-integration1 None [modified: 
/var/lib/dpkg/info/liblaunchpad-integration1.list] failed to install/upgrade: 
tentative de remplacement de 
??/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/lpi-bug.png??, qui appartient aussi au 
paquet liblaunchpad-integration0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to launchpad-integration in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 213863] Re: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/lpi-bug.png', which is also in package liblaunchpad-integration0

2008-04-08 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:31 PM, adel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 doesn't work for me because ubuntu boot into read only file system


Sounds like you got yourself into a jam. Did you happen to try one of the
(unsanctioned) workarounds?

Regardless, your best bet is to seek help via the various channels:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/HowToGetHelp.


** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13267894/unnamed

-- 
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/lpi-bug.png', which is 
also in package liblaunchpad-integration0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213863
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to launchpad-integration in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 35876] Re: 'Downloading package information' and 'building dependency tree' progress dialogs steal focus

2008-04-08 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:45 PM, dbsoundman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I experience in Hardy, no compiz. It is very annoying, because I have
 the normal desktop effects enabled, which is generally stable on my
 system, but my processor is an Athlon XP, so when I'm multi-tasking (as
 always), it makes my music skip, text is slow, it just eats up my CPU
 until it can turn the screen half-black and white, then go back, then
 repeat, etc.


This sounds like general CPU/buffer problems, which may be bugworthy, but
this report is not that. This is about the windows stealing focus, popping
up in front of other things.


** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13267891/unnamed

-- 
'Downloading package information' and 'building dependency tree' progress 
dialogs steal focus
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35876
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 85776] Re: [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV on package installation, valgrind log required

2008-04-08 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Scott Wegner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I was just upgrading my Hardy alpha 5 and got crash on reboot.


Very likely a different bug; could you possibly report a new bug via Apport?
(Apport will mark it as a duplicate if it turns out to be the same issue.)


** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13267952/unnamed

-- 
[apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV on package installation, valgrind log 
required
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85776
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 214021] Re: I have 2: Broken update pkgs, Add/remove error

2008-04-08 Thread Andrew Conkling
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 213863 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213863

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:19 PM, alcohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 213863 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213863

 Ditto.  Broke today after updating.


Already fixed. Please update and/or see the master bug.


** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13268001/unnamed

-- 
I have 2: Broken update pkgs, Add/remove error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214021
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to launchpad-integration in ubuntu
(via bug 213863).

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 214020] Re: gnome-app-install

2008-04-08 Thread Andrew Conkling
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 213863 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213863

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:49 PM, garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 O.k. I understood the message!
 DUPLICATE bug # bla bla
 This I've been told via E-Mail about 10 times. Habe verstanden!!

 I will never report a bug again if the only reaction is, geting mails
 and mails telling me duplicate.


garfield,
Bug notifications in general help notify you of fixes, and we certainly all
appreciate everyone's input. Please do report future bugs you find!

This is quite a high-traffic bug (a lot of people have reported new bugs
without checking for existing ones); perhaps you'd just like to unsubscribe
from this one:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/launchpad-integration/+bug/213863/+subscribe
.

Tschüß!

** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13267999/unnamed

-- 
gnome-app-install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214020
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to launchpad-integration in ubuntu
(via bug 213863).

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

Re: [Bug 35876] Re: 'Downloading package information' and 'building dependency tree' progress dialogs steal focus

2008-04-08 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:30 PM, dbsoundman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thanks Andrew, I was citing the effects of the problem just as an
 example, the main issue is indeed just that the windows steal the focus.
 For me, that sets off that chain reaction, because of my not-so-fast
 processor. I would definitely like to see the stealing focus feature
 removed.


OK, sorry for the confusion. :)


** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13268137/unnamed

-- 
'Downloading package information' and 'building dependency tree' progress 
dialogs steal focus
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35876
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 213863] Re: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/lpi-bug.png', which is also in package liblaunchpad-integration0

2008-04-08 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:28 PM, vitali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Confirmed. A possible workaround should be the following:
 1. Download
 2. Install this package manually
 3. sudo apt-get -f install or sudo apt-get upgrade


No need for these types of workarounds, this is fixed, please don't keep
suggesting them; other people may think they're necessary. At this point,
the new version should be in the archives and a standard system update
should resolve the problem.


** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13270041/unnamed

-- 
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/lpi-bug.png', which is 
also in package liblaunchpad-integration0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213863
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to launchpad-integration in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 93847] Re: Excessive CPU usage by Gnome System Monitor

2008-04-07 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Andrew Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Just adding my voice to the choir here.


A lot of people have, but there's no need. This is already reported upstream
to the developers.


** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13178382/unnamed

-- 
Excessive CPU usage by Gnome System Monitor 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93847
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 202405] Re: Rhythmbox does not listen to HAL regarding audio_folders

2008-04-05 Thread Andrew Conkling
This was fixed in 0.11.5 (in Hardy). I can dig up the GNOME Bugzilla bug
number if desired.

** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Fix Released

-- 
Rhythmbox does not listen to HAL regarding audio_folders
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202405
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 187383] Re: System monitor causes Xorg to consume 100% CPU

2008-04-01 Thread Andrew Conkling
Will, as Sebastian mentioned above, it has to do with the cairo
rendering that was put into the Resources graphs for 2.22/Hardy. It
doesn't always go to 100%; the CPU impact has a lot to do with your
video driver.

-- 
System monitor causes Xorg to consume 100% CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187383
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 187383] Re: System monitor causes Xorg to consume 100% CPU

2008-03-30 Thread Andrew Conkling
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #507797
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507797

** Also affects: gnome-system-monitor via
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507797
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
System monitor causes Xorg to consume 100% CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187383
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 202122] Re: system monitor 'Resources' tag CPU intensive

2008-03-30 Thread Andrew Conkling
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 187383 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187383

Hewus, you're right. They're both related to the updates in Resources.
Thanks for catching.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 187383
   System monitor causes Xorg to consume 100% CPU

-- 
system monitor 'Resources' tag CPU intensive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202122
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 93847] Re: Excessive CPU usage by Gnome System Monitor

2008-03-28 Thread Andrew Conkling
For the Hardy/Resources problem, see bug #202122, to which I attached
the Debian bug also.

** Changed in: gnome-system-monitor (Debian)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
Excessive CPU usage by Gnome System Monitor 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93847
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 202122] Re: system monitor 'Resources' tag CPU intensive

2008-03-28 Thread Andrew Conkling
This is not a duplicate of bug #93847; that bug predates the new graphs
in Hardy and has to do with high CPU usage even when not on the
Resources tab.

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 93847
   Excessive CPU usage by Gnome System Monitor

** Changed in: gnome-system-monitor (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = Confirmed

** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #507797
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507797

** Also affects: gnome-system-monitor via
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507797
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #471152
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=471152

** Also affects: gnome-system-monitor (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=471152
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
system monitor 'Resources' tag CPU intensive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202122
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 93847] Re: Excessive CPU usage by Gnome System Monitor

2008-03-28 Thread Andrew Conkling
Linking to correct upstream bug (which I just reported because I
couldn't find an existing one):
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524830. In sum: g-s-m uses too
much CPU. It is not just a matter of false reporting (like I had
previously incorrectly suggested), and is not related to the new
Resources graphs introduced in 2.22.

** Changed in: gnome-system-monitor (Debian)
 Bugwatch: Debian Bug tracker #471152 = GNOME Bug Tracker #524830
   Status: Confirmed = Unknown

** Changed in: gnome-system-monitor (Debian)
   Importance: Unknown = Undecided
 Bugwatch: GNOME Bug Tracker #524830 = None
   Status: Unknown = New

** Changed in: gnome-system-monitor
   Importance: Undecided = Unknown
 Bugwatch: None = GNOME Bug Tracker #524830
   Status: New = Unknown

-- 
Excessive CPU usage by Gnome System Monitor 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93847
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 93847] Re: Excessive CPU usage by Gnome System Monitor

2008-03-27 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:21 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #471152
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=471152


Thanks, but that's not the right bug. This bug predates the changes in Hardy
and doesn't have anything to do with the changes in the Resources tab.


** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12934405/unnamed

-- 
Excessive CPU usage by Gnome System Monitor 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93847
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 206319] Re: Couldn't close f-spot

2008-03-26 Thread Andrew Conkling
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 199496 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199496

No problem, David! That happens and is all just part of the game. :)
It's Apport that helps us easily determine all of the bug shtuff.


-Original Message-
From: Davegod75 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:24:32 
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Bug 206319] Re: Couldn't close f-spot


*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 199496 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199496

Sorry, for the dupes,  I am using Hardy crash report feature to submit
and it's hard to tell when there is duplicate sometimes.

David

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Pedro Villavicencio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 199496 ***
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199496

  ok, thanks you that's another dup of 199496 then, thanks again.

  ** Changed in: f-spot (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid

  ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 199496
Tomboy.exe crashed with SIGSEGV in exit()

  --
  Couldn't close f-spot
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206319
  You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
  of a duplicate bug (via bug 199496).


-- 
Couldn't close f-spot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206319
You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
of a duplicate bug (via bug 199496).

-- 
Couldn't close f-spot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206319
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 93847] Re: Excessive CPU usage by Gnome System Monitor

2008-03-16 Thread Andrew Conkling
Gadget Boy, this problem predates the smooth graphs introduced in Hardy.
This is about g-s-m reporting high CPU usage for itself, even when not
on the Resources tab. This has gotten worse in Hardy, yes, but is about
a preceding issue.

-- 
Excessive CPU usage by Gnome System Monitor 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93847
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 93847] Re: Excessive CPU usage by Gnome System Monitor

2008-03-16 Thread Andrew Conkling
gQuigs, yes, the graph/Resources issue is known upstream:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507797.

-- 
Excessive CPU usage by Gnome System Monitor 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93847
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 35876] Re: 'Downloading package information' and 'building dependency tree' progress dialogs steal focus

2008-03-14 Thread Andrew Conkling
** Also affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
'Downloading package information' and 'building dependency tree' progress 
dialogs steal focus
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35876
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 196298] Re: Lanuage Support: Completing install of en_US causes error on login

2008-03-14 Thread Andrew Conkling
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 178402 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178402

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 178402, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you
can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
the other report. Feel free to continue to report any other bugs you may
find.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 178402
   [hardy] missing language error

-- 
Lanuage Support: Completing install of en_US causes error on login
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196298
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu (via bug 178402).

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 57872] Re: regression: pressing power button no longer brings up logout dialog

2008-03-12 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 5:05 AM, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 What did you guys do that it works now?

 I upgraded to Teds gnome-power-manager - 2.22.0-0ubuntu1~ppa1 but
 nothing happens when I press the power button.


Be sure to restart gnome-power-manager. Easiest way is simply to log out and
back in.

-- 
regression: pressing power button no longer brings up logout dialog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57872
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 57872] Re: regression: pressing power button no longer brings up logout dialog

2008-03-12 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Be sure to restart gnome-power-manager. Easiest way is simply to log out
 and back in.
 I forgot to mention that I logged me out and in, even restarted my PC.

 In gnome-power-manager I tried interactive, suspend and shutdown non of
 them work.


Sounds like a different problem.

-- 
regression: pressing power button no longer brings up logout dialog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57872
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 57872] Re: regression: pressing power button no longer brings up logout dialog

2008-03-11 Thread Andrew Conkling
Ted, your package works for me; thanks for your work. Did this fix make
it upstream? (Is that even applicable in this case? :)

-- 
regression: pressing power button no longer brings up logout dialog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57872
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 177570] Re: [hardy] two batteries display when left clicking on g-p-m

2008-03-11 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:24 AM, Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Can you please all try my newly proposed version in my PPA?
  https://launchpad.net/%7Epitti/+archive
 I think that finally gets it right. Please report back here. Thank you!


I don't know what changes are in this version, but this package also seems
to work fine.

-- 
[hardy] two batteries display when left clicking on g-p-m
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177570
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 194052] Re: hal not reading information about sysfs batteries correctly

2008-03-04 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 6:28 AM, sharninder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Although has anyone noticed
 that the g-p-m display doesn't change as fast as the power settings
 display changes in windows.


Well, I've had a different experience with Windows' power management, and
that's certainly not Ubuntu's measure of quality. More to the point though,
it certainly does appear slower for me than it did on Gutsy or with the
previous Hardy packages. I just filed bug #198335 to that affect.

-- 
hal not reading information about sysfs batteries correctly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194052
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 197352] Re: Applications unable to access Filesystem

2008-03-04 Thread Andrew Conkling
Yes, that was the necessary information. (I can't do anything with it,
just correcting the status on the bug.)

** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
Applications unable to access Filesystem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 196864] Re: evolution/nautilus issue: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-03-03 Thread Andrew Conkling
** Summary changed:

- HARDY HERON evolution/nautilus issue: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV
+ evolution/nautilus issue: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: nautilus
  
- This is how the crash occured:
- 
+ This is how the crash occurred:
  1. clicked on the evolution icon to open up my email
- 
- 2. before evolution had loaded, I noticed that two of the icons on my
- desktop were on top of each other
- 
- 3. *still before evolution had loaded* - I clicked on one of the icons
- that was overlapping and started to drag it to a different spot on the
- desktop
- 
- 4. evolution loaded and was displayed while I was still in the process
- of dragging an Icon. I had to release the mouse button so I could
- minimise evolution.
- 
+ 2. before evolution had loaded, I noticed that two of the icons on my desktop 
were on top of each other
+ 3. *still before evolution had loaded* - I clicked on one of the icons that 
was overlapping and started to drag it to a different spot on the desktop
+ 4. evolution loaded and was displayed while I was still in the process of 
dragging an Icon. I had to release the mouse button so I could minimise 
evolution.
  5. at this point (mouse button release) nautilus crashed.
- 
  
  Hardy heron alpha with all updates as at 29th February 3:27pm AEST.
  
  ProblemType: Crash
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Fri Feb 29 15:18:45 2008
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  Package: nautilus 1:2.21.92-0ubuntu1
  PackageArchitecture: i386
  ProcCmdline: nautilus --sm-client-id 117f00010100012042515500056390001 
--screen 0
  ProcEnviron:
   PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
   LANG=en_AU.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  Signal: 11
  SourcePackage: nautilus
  StacktraceTop:
   ?? ()
   ?? ()
   ?? ()
   ?? ()
   ?? () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV
  Uname: Linux 2.6.24-10-generic i686
  UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin plugdev video

-- 
evolution/nautilus issue: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 196864] Re: evolution/nautilus issue: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-03-03 Thread Andrew Conkling
According to bug #196096 (of which this should be a duplicate, but I'm
not cleaning up 20+ other bug reports), this was fixed today:


This bug was fixed in the package nautilus -
1:2.21.92svn20080303-0ubuntu1

---
nautilus (1:2.21.92svn20080303-0ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low

  * SVN snaphost version:
- fix some crashers (lp: #186665, #196096, #197882)

 -- Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:25:43
+0100

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
evolution/nautilus issue: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 196864] Re: evolution/nautilus issue: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-03-03 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 4:18 PM, James Deibele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 apport-cli reports no pending crash reports so I can't do that.


Use (IIRC) 'apport-cli -c /path/to/file.crash'.

-- 
evolution/nautilus issue: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 196864] Re: evolution/nautilus issue: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-03-03 Thread Andrew Conkling
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:58 PM, James Deibele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 I have no idea what you are saying.   I don't know what IIRC means and I
 don't know where files crash.


Sorry James. You should be able to navigate to /var/crash and double-click
on any .crash files listed there, but you can also use apport-cli. I had the
same message you did until I used the following syntax: 'apport-cli -c
/var/crash/example.crash'. Sorry I was unclear.

By the way, IIRC = If I Recall Correctly. :)

-- 
evolution/nautilus issue: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 197544] [NEW] nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEAN()

2008-03-01 Thread Andrew Conkling
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: nautilus

Nautilus crashed/restarted after I was deleting some files and
recovering others from the Trash.

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Mar  2 00:19:40 2008
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Package: nautilus 1:2.21.92-0ubuntu1
PackageArchitecture: i386
ProcCmdline: nautilus --no-default-window --sm-client-id default2
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/zsh
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: nautilus
StacktraceTop:
 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEAN ()
 g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEAN()
Uname: Linux 2.6.24-10-generic i686
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin netdev 
plugdev powerdev sambashare scanner vboxusers video

** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-crash need-i386-retrace

-- 
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEAN()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197544
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 197544] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEAN()

2008-03-01 Thread Andrew Conkling

** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12348190/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12348191/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12348192/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12348193/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12348194/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: Registers.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12348195/Registers.txt

** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12348196/Stacktrace.txt

** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12348197/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEAN()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197544
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


  1   2   3   4   >