[Bug 291626] Re: no battery indicator in Intrepid
Thanks for your bug report jamy015! Is your laptop fully charged? The applet by default disappears when it is fully charged, so try unplugging it for a minute and seeing if it appears. If it doesn't it sounds like a bug, let us know. ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = gnome-power-manager Status: New = Incomplete -- no battery indicator in Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291626 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 291626] Re: no battery indicator in Intrepid
No problem jamy. If you want it to always show up, you can change that in the preferences of the applet by right-clicking on it. ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- no battery indicator in Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291626 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 259799] Re: Suggestion: support for ecryptfs in Nautilus
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the worst usability problems would be fixed with nautilus ignoring the ecryptfs mount entirely. I think this could be a great improvement, too. For Jaunty I wouldn't mind working with Dustin and creating a GUI for ecryptfs-utils, if there is interest, that allows the user to set it up, mount/unmount, and toggle configuration options (bug #257901). This would allow a desktop user to go through the whole process without touching a terminal. Granted [un]mount support in nautilus would be slick. -- Suggestion: support for ecryptfs in Nautilus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259799 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 61237] Re: Drag 'n Drop in list view doesn't work
** Tags added: usability -- Drag 'n Drop in list view doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61237 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 136702] Re: nautilus 'replace file' dialog box could give more information
** Tags added: usability -- nautilus 'replace file' dialog box could give more information https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 269901] Re: one click on the places sidebar to show volume
Thanks Sebastien, I can confirm that the issue is addressed after the updates (and a restart). I think Intrepid will benefit from this usability bug being squashed. -- one click on the places sidebar to show volume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 285582] Re: Spelling mistake - Sleep Desactivated
Thanks for using Ubuntu and thanks for taking the time to file this bug report! I can't seem to duplicate this on my machine; can you explain how you can trigger that string to appear? I tried enabling the power management plugin but still don't see any text above the album artwork. Thanks again! ** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Spelling mistake - Sleep Desactivated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 283896] Re: can't use an empty configuration
Sebastien, this is a real and perfectly valid issue. You can't just not use gnome-panel; it is integrated into the desktop experience and provides no way to remove it from startup since it isn't explicitly there in the first place. This issue is if you don't want to use it, there is no apparent way to do this, although the intuitive way would be to just remove the last panel like any other panel. The bug, as such, is that you can't remove the last panel like any other panel. Typically you have to resort to a dirty hack or two to stop gnome-panel from starting, and we are quite familiar with this in the AWN world. This is definitely a common issue with users using docks such as AWN who no longer have a need for any panels but lack a simple or clean way to remove them. ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed ** Summary changed: - can't use an empty configuration + Can't remove all (last) gnome-panel panels ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-panel - Since I want to use awn instead of gnome-panel I'd like to remove all - gnome-panel panels. However when attempting to remove the last panel, - the menu item is greyed out. + Users are able to right click on panels of gnome-panel and select + Delete This Panel. However when there is only one panel remaining, + this option is grayed out. This wouldn't be a problem if gnome-panel was + an entry in sessions that could simply be disabled/removed to stop it + from starting up, but this isn't the case. + + Many users of docks such as AWN have no need for gnome-panel but must + resort to dirty hacks to stop it from running (such as renaming /usr/bin + /gnome-panel, which causes upgrade problems among others). + + The cleanest solution would just be to allow the user to remove any + gnome-panel, whether or not it is the last. Ideally this would still + allow the Alt+F2 launcher to work which is bundled with gnome-panel, but + a simple way to stop gnome-panel from starting would suffice. -- Can't remove all (last) gnome-panel panels https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283896 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 271229] Re: screensavers broken in intrepid with compiz
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 278112 Screensaver doesn't start ** Description changed: Binary package hint: electricsheep + + NOTE: Seemingly NOT a duplicate of bug 278112. This bug is different + than the original bug because the original bug is fixed with unchecking + Undirect Fullscreen Windows, the one reported here, however, is not + fixed with that. electricsheep won't run for me in fullscreen mode as a screensaver in Ubuntu Intrepid with an ATI X800 All In Wonder video card with compiz enabled and running (using open driver). I run a widescreen Dell LCD monitor at 1680x1050. I don't know whether the bug is actually in electricsheep, compiz, or some Xorg related package. I can run it from a terminal prompt to have it come up in a window: electricsheep --root 0 and it's fine. The installed desktop file launches it like this: electricsheep --root 1 --zoom 1 With or without zoom, the --root 1 option kills it. If in gnome-screensaver I can preview the screensaver perfectly with no problems but when it trys to run it flashes to black and then immediately quits, putting you back on your desktop. Disabling compiz temporarily and switching back to metacity instead and electricsheep works perfectly fine. I read a bit and (with compiz enabled) tried turning the setting Unredirect fullscreen windows both on and off with no effect on electricsheep. I also downloaded mplayer and tried running electricsheep like this: electricsheep --mplayer 1 Interestingly enough, that works with the version of electricsheep currently in the repo somewhat... it blacks out the screen, but runs in 4:3 resolution in my widescreen monitor whereas running electricsheep normally without mplayer (and compiz disabled) fills the entire screen. I've ALSO tried the latest PPA 's from here: https://launchpad.net/~flam3/+archive Same effects... runs great without compiz or windowed but won't run as my screensaver... and this version from the PPA won't accept either the --zoom 1 or --mplayer 1 command line options. I'd appreciate any help. I really love this screensaver. $ lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu intrepid (development branch) Release: 8.10 apt-cache policy electricsheep electricsheep: Installed: 2.7b10-0ubuntu1~ppa0 Candidate: 2.7b10-0ubuntu1~ppa0 Version table: *** 2.7b10-0ubuntu1~ppa0 0 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net hardy/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.6.8-9ubuntu1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/universe Packages apt-cache policy compiz compiz: Installed: 1:0.7.7+git20080807-0ubuntu9 Candidate: 1:0.7.7+git20080807-0ubuntu9 Version table: *** 1:0.7.7+git20080807-0ubuntu9 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- screensavers broken in intrepid with compiz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271229 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 283896] Re: [intrepid] cannot delete panel anymore
Hi LCID Fire, thanks for using Ubuntu and thanks for taking the time to file this bug report! As far as I know this is not a regression, as it has never been possible to remove the last panel. You can remove panels until you try to do it on the last one, at which point the option will be grayed out as you say. I agree it would be a nice feature and will Confirm the issue and mark it as Wishlist. There are guides for doing it online however, or just ask in #awn on freenode. ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist Status: New = Confirmed -- [intrepid] cannot delete panel anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283896 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 283896] Re: Cannot delete last panel
** Summary changed: - [intrepid] cannot delete panel anymore + Cannot delete last panel ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-panel - Since I want to use awn instead of gnome-panel I'd like to remove the - gnome panel - which does not work anymore in intrepid - the menu item is - greyed out. + Since I want to use awn instead of gnome-panel I'd like to remove all + gnome-panel panels. However when attempting to remove the last panel, + the menu item is greyed out. -- Cannot delete last panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283896 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 209072] Re: network tools icon is huge in add/remove applications
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Martin Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm wondering because I can not confrm this for hardy... It was worked around for Hardy in gnome-app-install, so you won't see it there (or hopefully ever again). Thanks for reminding us to adjust the gnome-icon-theme task! -- network tools icon is huge in add/remove applications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-icon-theme in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 279360] Re: unrar should be installed to open rar files
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Iain Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does unrar-free not do the job adequately? No, I think the point of the bug report is that rar files are associated with file-roller, though if you try to open them file-roller just gives you an error. Instead it should offer to install unrar (or unrar-free). A new user is going to see this error and not know how to open the file. -- unrar should be installed to open rar files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 281799] Re: intrepid: can not unmount Private data from desktop (ecrypt)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 259799 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259799 Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported, but feel free to report any other bugs you find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 259799 Suggestion: support for ecryptfs in Nautilus -- intrepid: can not unmount Private data from desktop (ecrypt) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281799 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee (via bug 259799). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 242345] Re: Calculation error with GCalc
Thanks Respawner, I closed this thanks to your update. If you can reproduce it, feel free to change the status back to New. ** Changed in: gcalctool (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- Calculation error with GCalc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242345 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 279118] Re: fileroller drag and extract
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 185387 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185387 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 185387 can not drag a file to a nautilus folder which uses list mode -- fileroller drag and extract https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279118 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 185387] Re: can not drag a file to a nautilus folder which uses list mode
** Tags added: usability -- can not drag a file to a nautilus folder which uses list mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185387 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 279118] Re: fileroller drag and extract
Yes, I can confirm this in Intrepid. However I think this is a duplicate of bug 185387. Kim, can you confirm that it only fails for Nautilus folders in List view (Ctrl+2) and not in Icon view (Ctrl+1)? If so, I'll mark as a duplicate. Thanks! ** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- fileroller drag and extract https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279118 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 278732] Re: AWN Quit Logoff Applet No Longer Allows Shutdown or Restart
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 252795 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252795 As Mark says this has nothing to do with AWN and is an issue with the Intrepid beta. There is a fix available in a PPA in the duplicate bug which you can test however; it works for me. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 252795 pressing the Power button shows a logout dialog -- AWN Quit Logoff Applet No Longer Allows Shutdown or Restart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278732 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu (via bug 252795). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 252795] Re: pressing the Power button shows a logout dialog
Yes, it seems to work after a restart, showing the power options dialog instead of the logout dialog. I still think having them all together was nice, and some people will complain that they can't logout/lock from the power button now, but this is surely better! Is there any page or archived discussion regarding the separation of the dialogs? I assume this was just an upstream Gnome decision? -- pressing the Power button shows a logout dialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 252795] Re: pressing the Power button shows a logout dialog
Fair enough, I can understand the reasoning. It would be extra slick if the Power Management option Ask me was then appropriately split into two options, something roughly like Prompt me with power options and Prompt me with session options, since I imagine some people only used the power button to logout or lock and might prefer this option. I understand the UI is frozen, but it might be something to consider for Jaunty. If anyone agrees I can make a wishlist bug; let me know. -- pressing the Power button shows a logout dialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 252795] Re: pressing the Power button shows a logout dialog
There's also a bug upstream about this at : http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507393 , linking the report. Thanks Pedro! But if the upstream bug is in gnome-session, is the gnome-session (Ubuntu) aspect still Invalid (and is the g-p-m one correct) as Hew swapped them? -- pressing the Power button shows a logout dialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes
Thanks for the update Kevin, I'll set the status back to New. You may want to edit the original description to more explicitly reflect the broken behavior and what you expect it to be, although it doesn't do a bad job now. ** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 42686] Re: audioscrobbler password saved configuration file
Alright, here is the patch I came up with (also sent upstream). It seems to work in that new passwords are stored as md5 and existing plaintext ones are converted, and tracks are successfully sent to last.fm. Daniel, you seem to have some experience in this area, any hints for a first time contributor? Should I attempt to get a PPA up to ease testing? Or what is the next step? ** Attachment added: rhythmbox-md5passwd-2.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18042379/rhythmbox-md5passwd-2.patch ** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Confirmed ** Summary changed: - audioscrobbler password saved configuration file + audioscrobbler password saved as plaintext in gconf ** Description changed: When saving a password for audioscrobbler, it is saved in .gconf unencoded. It appears in /home/kevinly/.gconf/apps/rhythmbox/audioscrobbler/%gconf.xml I realize that you should use different password for different websites, but some may inadvertantly set the user's (and thus su) password for their audioscrobbler password. + + A better option would be to store the md5 of the password instead since + that is all last.fm requires for authorization. An optimal solution may + be to use gnome-keyring instead of gconf. -- audioscrobbler password saved as plaintext in gconf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 42686] Re: audioscrobbler password saved as plaintext in gconf
** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Assignee: Mike Rooney (michael) = (unassigned) -- audioscrobbler password saved as plaintext in gconf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 42686] Re: audioscrobbler password saved configuration file
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:49 AM, Daniel T Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: @Mike any movement on the patch? Thanks for the reminder Daniel, I'll take another look at it for Intrepid. -- audioscrobbler password saved configuration file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 42686] Re: audioscrobbler password saved configuration file
Five chunks of the patch failed (it looks like there has been some rework/updating in the plugin since this patch was made), so I had to do some of it by hand, making a guess or two at behavior. I am going to try compiling the new plugin and seeing if it works, and/or submitting it upstream for a review. ** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) = Mike Rooney (michael) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- audioscrobbler password saved configuration file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 12682] Re: Dragging remote volumes to Trash should unmount them
This is actually explicitly against the Gnome HIG. From http://library.gnome.org/devel/hig-book/stable/principles-match.html.en : When using metaphors, however, it is important to neither take the metaphor too literally, nor to extend the metaphor beyond its reasonable use. For example, the capacity of a file folder should not be limited to the capacity of a physical file folder, which presumably could contain only a few documents before becoming unwieldy. On the other hand, a waste basket should not be used for anything other than holding discarded files. It should not be used, for example, to eject a removable disk such as a floppy or CD. Also nautilus now has eject buttons on volumes starting in Intrepid so I think this is arguably both deprecated and undesirable. -- Dragging remote volumes to Trash should unmount them https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12682 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 196666] Re: programing menu is not visible when occupied only with python(2.5) and umbrello
Thanks Patrick for the screenshot, I am now classifying this as a bug in gnome-panel as a result. ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = gnome-panel Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- programing menu is not visible when occupied only with python(2.5) and umbrello https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 269901] Re: one click on the places sidebar to show volume
Hi Jarlath! This bug was rated as per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance, specifically the first and last bullet points. While I understand your concern, the actual portion of the Ubuntu community which actively develops is rather small and limited, so issues like non-booting systems, program crashes, and improper configurations are more deserving of higher priorities. Regardless, this bug is an upstream bug in nautilus and the developers there don't work based on Ubuntu's importance, they consider it within the scope of their own project. However one of the core developers of nautilus picked up on it and discovered the precise cause so I think we are in good hands :) Thanks for your input. -- one click on the places sidebar to show volume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 269934] Re: If not using AWN, icons in bottom panel are hard to distinguish
Yes, I'll mark as gnome-panel. I see what you mean partially, as the application icons have a sort of fade to them which makes it harder to spot them quickly. However in general once you get used to a something you prefer more such as AWN, it is going to be harder going back. Have you tried enabling compositing in metacity? ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = gnome-panel Status: Incomplete = Confirmed ** Summary changed: - If not using AWN, icons in bottom panel are hard to distinguish + application icons are faded and hard to distinguish ** Description changed: - I was forced to stop using AWN because of a bug when I have - compositioning enabled. I was struck by how hard it was to distinguish - between the different applications I had running. I found that many - times when switching between apps, it took me many seconds to recognize - the right app. + I was forced to stop using AWN because of a bug when I have compositing + enabled. I was struck by how hard it was to distinguish between the + different applications I had running. I found that many times when + switching between apps, it took me many seconds to recognize the right + app. When not using AWN most icons just are grey. I'm attaching a screenshot of bottom panel with AWN and a normal gnome panel. -- application icons are faded and hard to distinguish https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269934 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 269932] Re: Every time when i log in to Gnome 2.23.92 on Ubtun 8.10 BETA i got this error message, before i can continue with loading my desktop. This is since the big update yesterday
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 269215 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269215 Hi mogli, thanks for using Ubuntu and thanks for taking the time to report this bug! This particular bug has already been filed and is a duplicate of BUG #269215. Please leave any further information you have there. It is a confirmed bug so you need not make any more confirmations. Please feel free to report any more bugs you may find in order to help make Ubuntu better! ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 269215 There is a problem with the configuration server. (/usr/lib/libgconf2-4/gconf-sanity-check-2 exited with status 256) -- Every time when i log in to Gnome 2.23.92 on Ubtun 8.10 BETA i got this error message, before i can continue with loading my desktop. This is since the big update yesterday https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269932 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 269901] Re: one click on the places sidebar to show volume
I can confirm that this is an issue in Hardy, and I've forwarded it upstream. Thanks for your bug report David, and for helping to make Ubuntu better! ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Triaged -- one click on the places sidebar to show volume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 269901] Re: one click on the places sidebar to show volume
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #552168 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=552168 ** Also affects: nautilus via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=552168 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- one click on the places sidebar to show volume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 269553] Re: [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV
Thanks for your bug report flywelder, I am assigning it to the correct package so that it can be looked at by the right people. Would it be possible for you to briefly describe what was happening when you got the crash, or what may have caused it? Thanks for using Ubuntu and thanks for your contribution to it! ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = gnome-panel -- [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269553 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 268834] Re: drag and drop file path only works from icon view
Thanks Dave. To me it sounds like the same issue manifesting itself in a different way, as the issue potentially is only a result of what you are dragging to (the list view), not where it came from or what it is. But I will leave it as New for someone will more knowledge to figure out :) ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- drag and drop file path only works from icon view https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268834 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 268834] Re: drag and drop file path only works from icon view
Thanks for the clarification Dave, I did indeed have it backwards! -- drag and drop file path only works from icon view https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268834 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 117578] Re: filename not changed to the standard when adding a song to ipod
Yes, this is a nasty one since files with fat32 chars can't be transferred, and rhythmbox just gives a generic error not explaining why. The files must then be manually renamed and transferred again. At the very least rhythmbox should sanitize filenames by removing or replacing such characters, otherwise it can lead to an incredibly confusing and frustrating user experience. Many users with large libraries are bound to have a few of these characters such as a quote or colon. Perhaps this deserves a separate bug specific just to sanitization, as a new naming scheme isn't necessarily required? ** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Low = Medium ** Summary changed: - filename not changed to the standard when adding a song to ipod + Filename not changed to the standard when adding a song to iPod, can result in errors ** Description changed: Binary package hint: rhythmbox - I was adding a song to my ipod (dragged it from the library) while I noticed that its filename in the ipod does not follow the standard - .mp3 but had the name unaltered which is 04-J'ai Dormi Sous L'eau.mp3 + I was adding a song to my ipod (dragged it from the library) while I + noticed that its filename in the ipod does not follow the standard + .mp3 but had the name unaltered which is 04-J'ai Dormi Sous + L'eau.mp3 - could this create problems? + One serious consequence of this is that filenames with invalid + characters for the target filesystem (such as a quote, colon, , , to + name a few) are unable to be transferred to the device and result in a + generic rhythmbox error. -- Filename not changed to the standard when adding a song to iPod, can result in errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 117578] Re: Filename not changed to the standard when adding a song to iPod, can result in errors
Apparently a version of Colin's patch was committed in r5751 of rhythmbox SVN on June 15th, so Intrepid should have the sanitization of illegal characters issue fixed at least. ** Summary changed: - Filename not changed to the standard when adding a song to iPod, can result in errors + Filename not changed to the standard when adding a song to iPod ** Description changed: Binary package hint: rhythmbox I was adding a song to my ipod (dragged it from the library) while I noticed that its filename in the ipod does not follow the standard .mp3 but had the name unaltered which is 04-J'ai Dormi Sous L'eau.mp3 - One serious consequence of this is that filenames with invalid - characters for the target filesystem (such as a quote, colon, , , to - name a few) are unable to be transferred to the device and result in a - generic rhythmbox error. + One serious consequence of this (now fixed in Intrepid but still + affecting Hardy and earlier) is that filenames with invalid characters + for the target filesystem (such as a quote, colon, , , to name a few) + are unable to be transferred to the device and result in a generic + rhythmbox error. -- Filename not changed to the standard when adding a song to iPod https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 268834] Re: drag and drop file path only works from icon view
Hi Dave, thanks for using Ubuntu and thanks for taking the time to file this bug report! I think this bug has already been filed as bug #61237; please check it out and let me know if you think this is a different bug or the same one. Thanks and please continue to report any new bugs that you find. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- drag and drop file path only works from icon view https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268834 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 185387] Re: can not drag a file to a nautilus folder which uses list mode
Is this a duplicate of bug #61237 (or vice versa), and if not, what is different? -- can not drag a file to a nautilus folder which uses list mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185387 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 250497] Re: gnome-screensaver has stopped working for me
Okay, thanks for update Francis! I will close this report. If the issue comes back, feel free to re-open the bug report by setting the Status to New. And of course, continue to contribute to Ubuntu by reporting any new bugs that you may find! ** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- gnome-screensaver has stopped working for me https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250497 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 257264] Re: Rhythmbox cannot play audio after watching Flash video in Firefox
** Description changed: Binary package hint: rhythmbox After playing a Flash video in Firefox, Rhythmbox cannot play audio. It - will sit at 0:00 of the audio file. Restarting Firefox and then - restarting Rhythmbox will allow Rhythmbox to play audio again. + will sit at 0:00 of the audio file. + + WORKAROUND: + 1) Shutdown (or restart) Firefox. + 2) Restart Rhythmbox. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Aug 12 15:53:55 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/rhythmbox Package: rhythmbox 0.11.5-0ubuntu8 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: PATH=/home/username/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: rhythmbox Uname: Linux 2.6.24-19-generic i686 ** Tags added: metabug -- Rhythmbox cannot play audio after watching Flash video in Firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257264 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 253958] Re: rhythmbox player does not play anymore
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 257264 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257264 Hello, I've marked this as a duplicate of bug #257264 as it is a more polished and complete bug report. Please direct any comments there. Thanks! ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 257264 Rhythmbox cannot play audio after watching Flash video in Firefox -- rhythmbox player does not play anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253958 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee (via bug 257264). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 253405] Re: Bad quality of a png image when smooth images when zoom is active
So this is an hardware problem? Not really, not with your specific hardware anyway, it is just How It Works. I would recommend http://webdesign.about.com/cs/antialiasing/a/aa051898.htm for a quick read which might clear up any questions you have. Images on your screen are made up of pixels, which are of a set size. Anti-aliasing tries to work around this but a trade-off is that the image can become blurred. You can't have smooth and sharp at the same time, unfortunately. Also try http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ClearType#How_ClearType_works for more interesting related information. status invalid -- Bad quality of a png image when smooth images when zoom is active https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253405 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 253405] Re: Bad quality of a png image when smooth images when zoom is active
** Changed in: eog (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- Bad quality of a png image when smooth images when zoom is active https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253405 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 253405] Re: Bad quality of a png image when smooth images when zoom is active
In my mind, the text of smooth.png image is fuzziness and the text of nosmooth.png picture is not. Yes, it is going to be a bit fuzzy depending on size and potentially subpixel hinting (you may want to play around with that on your system). The whole point of smoothing is to unsharpen, it is a trade-off, especially for a line with such a small width. Pixels are only so small; it is a technological limitation of monitors. Maybe some day we will have true floating point monitors. -- Bad quality of a png image when smooth images when zoom is active https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253405 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 257264] Re: music doesn't playing
Hi splix. Often this can occur after playing a flash video; did this occur? If you have a browser such as Firefox open, close it, restart rhythmbox, and try playing again. If flash was the issue, it should work now. -- music doesn't playing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257264 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 257264] Re: music doesn't playing
Thanks splix for your feedback! I will move this to libflashsupport. I feel like this should be a dupe, I have seen lots of these, but I can't find one at the moment. ** Changed in: libflashsupport (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: rhythmbox = libflashsupport Importance: Low = Medium Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- music doesn't playing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257264 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 257264] Re: Rhythmbox cannot play audio after watching Flash video in Firefox
** Summary changed: - music doesn't playing + Rhythmbox cannot play audio after watching Flash video in Firefox ** Description changed: Binary package hint: rhythmbox - When i press Play button there are nothing happened. Just icon changet - to arrow () and nothing more. + After playing a Flash video in Firefox, Rhythmbox cannot play audio. It + will sit at 0:00 of the audio file. Restarting Firefox and then + restarting Rhythmbox will allow Rhythmbox to play audio again. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Aug 12 15:53:55 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/rhythmbox Package: rhythmbox 0.11.5-0ubuntu8 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: PATH=/home/username/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: rhythmbox Uname: Linux 2.6.24-19-generic i686 -- Rhythmbox cannot play audio after watching Flash video in Firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257264 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 82724] Re: Cannot install fonts using method described in help
Is this Invalid then, since Edgy is no longer supported and this scheme no longer exists? Or is still valid for Dapper/Feisty/Gutsy? -- Cannot install fonts using method described in help https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 229225] Re: serious problem with gnome-power-manager
Hi, I am marking as New. Are you still having the issue in Hardy 8.04.1? ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- serious problem with gnome-power-manager https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229225 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 250014] Re: inconsistent backlight change and volume change behavior
** Summary changed: - change icon + inconsistent backlight change and volume change behavior ** Description changed: - When i change volume the feedback icon style is different with the - screen backlight change feedback icon style. + When I change volume the feedback icon style is different with the + screen backlight change feedback icon style. They should be consistent, + similar dialogs, and just use different icons. -- inconsistent backlight change and volume change behavior https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250014 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 31943] Re: Gnome-power-manager allows multiple dialogues to open
Is this Fix Released, or Invalid, now that the left-click behavior is just a menu? You can still open multiple dialogs via right clicks, but that is so explicit that I think that behavior is fine. ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- Gnome-power-manager allows multiple dialogues to open https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/31943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 253270] Re: Getting Shares working not as smooth as expected
Hi Phoenix, thanks for using Ubuntu and thanks for taking the time to file this report! The general issue you speak of is known about and we are working to resolve it and make sharing much easier. Relevant bugs are bug 238224, bug 212098. I think this bug is a duplicate of bug 212098, and between the two bugs I mentioned I believe your issues are addressed; please read them and let me know if your report covers issues that they do not. If not I can appropriately mark this as a duplicate and you can subscribe to them! Thanks again, let me know. ** Changed in: meta-gnome2 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: nautilus-share (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: meta-gnome2 = nautilus-share -- Getting Shares working not as smooth as expected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253270 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to meta-gnome2 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 253270] Re: Getting Shares working not as smooth as expected
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 212098 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212098 Okay thanks Philipp, I will mark this as a duplicate of bug 212098 and you will be automatically subscribed to it. If you later disagree just comment here and let me know! ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 212098 easy file sharing not notifying about logout/login -- Getting Shares working not as smooth as expected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253270 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee (via bug 212098). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 61237] Re: Drag 'n Drop in list view doesn't work
I experience this as well, but not with the limitation others have mentioned of having to have lots of items to fill up the list view. For me, I can't drag and drop to any folder in list view, no matter how few items are in it, at least with file-roller. Changing to icon view allows me to drag and drop just fine. While Goswin's other issue of not being able to drag to select files (lasso'ing) may be a separate bug report, I wouldn't be surprised if it was somehow related, as with the right-click issues. Overall, something funky is going on with the unused portion of the window (where there aren't icons) in the list view, and the view in general. -- Drag 'n Drop in list view doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61237 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 252539] Re: can't adjust my screen resolution
Thanks Regent, as per your last comment I will close this bug report; I am glad you resolved the issue! ** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- can't adjust my screen resolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252539 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 252885] Re: Drag-and-drop theme from web page fails
This would be great to have. I guess the previous IO library handled HTTP and the current one does not? I can confirm that it doesn't work in Hardy, and that a dialog pops up but disappears so quickly you can't even see it. There is no traceback or message when run from the console. By the way Colin, I really appreciate you filing bugs from that blog, I think they are important issues. ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium Status: New = Confirmed -- Drag-and-drop theme from web page fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252885 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 205773] Re: Nautilus tries to copy a dragged file into Network on hover and freezes
So this was fixed in nautilus 2.25.1 according to upstream; is there any chance of patching the Hardy nautilus to get this fix? We will probably also have to apply this patch to Intrepid as well, since that will have 2.24 and not 2.25 IIUC. Creating a patch would be worth the effort I think, since a) we can't just ignore it since it will still exist in Intrepid and b) Hardy is an LTS so not fixing this issue there will cause grief for years to come. Any thoughts A. Walton, or anyone else? -- Nautilus tries to copy a dragged file into Network on hover and freezes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205773 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 205773] Re: Nautilus tries to copy a dragged file into Network on hover and freezes
And a second question, will this stop the error message from appearing that I attached in comment #16, or will it just appear later when/if the async operation fails? That would be quite confusing for users if an error message popped up after a delay. -- Nautilus tries to copy a dragged file into Network on hover and freezes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205773 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 252621] Re: About Ubuntu doesn't use a theme agnostic icon
Looks good, Dan! The only other thing I would suggest is to change the title as well, since I don't think it accurately reflects your issue anymore. You don't want it to be theme agnostic, you just want it to behave correctly when the theme doesn't specify one. ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = gnome-panel -- About Ubuntu doesn't use a theme agnostic icon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 205773] Re: Nautilus tries to copy a dragged file into Network on hover and freezes
I thought it was the 2.23 series that is currently in Intrepid (http://packages.ubuntu.com/intrepid/nautilus), with plans for 2.24. Gnome 2.26 won't be until Intrepid+1, right? Am I missing something? -- Nautilus tries to copy a dragged file into Network on hover and freezes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205773 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 250497] Re: gnome-screensaver has stoped working for me
Hi Francis, thanks for using Ubuntu, and thanks for taking the time to file this bug report! We need some more information to figure out the issue however. What version of Ubuntu are you using (Feisty 7.04, Gutsy 7.10, Hardy 8.04...etc), and what version of gnome-screensaver do you have? Do find this last piece of information, run apt-cache policy gnome-screensaver | grep Installed from a terminal, and provide the output here. Thanks! ** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Summary changed: - gnome-screensaver has stoped working for me + gnome-screensaver has stopped working for me -- gnome-screensaver has stopped working for me https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250497 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 250497] Re: gnome-screensaver has stopped working for me
Thanks for the information, Francis, I'll mark it as New again! ** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- gnome-screensaver has stopped working for me https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250497 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 247301] Re: [Intrepid] Nautilus tried to open a text document with no .extension and failed
** Summary changed: - [Intrepid] Naultis tried to opena text document (with no .extension) and fails + [Intrepid] Nautilus tried to open a text document with no .extension and failed ** Description changed: Binary package hint: nautilus - When trying to opne a text Document without a .txt or any .bleh it tries to open it and fails with + When trying to open a text Document without a .txt or any .bleh it tries to open it and fails with Malformed patch header. No orig name '\n' the file i am trying to open is named ~/Documents/saved_files/Commands this happens with all like named files. html files open in browser like they should and odt open in OO.o - The text files should open in default text editor including files that first line is # since in bash its a comment as well as other scripts. It asks to display or run and i click disply and thats when i get the error + The text files should open in default text editor including files that first line is # since in bash its a comment as well as other scripts. It asks to display or run and i click display and thats when i get the error ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Jul 10 10:49:41 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus Package: nautilus 1:2.23.4-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus Uname: Linux 2.6.26-3-generic i686 -- [Intrepid] Nautilus tried to open a text document with no .extension and failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247301 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 205773] Re: Nautilus tries to copy a dragged file into Network on hover and freezes
** Attachment added: Error message after long (5-10s) unresponsive delay. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15939044/Screenshot-nautilus.png -- Nautilus tries to copy a dragged file into Network on hover and freezes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205773 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 205773] Re: Nautilus tries to copy a dragged file into Network on hover and freezes
Yes, I must admit this is supremely annoying, not only because it causes such a delay in which you can't use nautilus, but because it also destroys your drag state and have to do it over, being careful to not hover of the network. This happens to me on almost a daily basis. I will attach a screenshot of the error message that I get in 8.04.1. -- Nautilus tries to copy a dragged file into Network on hover and freezes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205773 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 215764] Re: Can not communicate with Windows users
Hi uwe, are you still experiencing this problem in Hardy, assuming you have upgraded? If you can verify it still exists in the newest version of ekiga (2.0.12-0ubuntu2), then I shall mark it as Confirmed and hopefully someone from ekiga can help out more. If the problem still exists please run apt-cache policy ekiga | grep Installed (without the quotes) in a terminal and include the output. Thanks! -- Can not communicate with Windows users https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215764 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to ekiga in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 209072] Re: network tools icon is huge in add/remove applications
Thanks Michael and Brian! Does anything still need to happen with gnome- icon-theme, and if so, what? -- network tools icon is huge in add/remove applications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-icon-theme in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 223954] Re: Brightness control still has major bugs
Setting as Confirmed as John has provided the information Marlon asked for. Marlon, if you are going to mark a bug as Incomplete it is quite preferable that you adjust the status again when the person has provided the necessary information; otherwise the original filer may have no idea how to do this and a legitimate bug can expire. ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- Brightness control still has major bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223954 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 244641] Re: Brasero Disc Burning -delete file from project ends up in trash can
** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = brasero -- Brasero Disc Burning -delete file from project ends up in trash can https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 244641] Re: Brasero Disc Burning -delete file from project ends up in trash can
No problem zappp, thanks for figuring it out! ** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- Brasero Disc Burning -delete file from project ends up in trash can https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 243229] Re: Video plays really slow
I don't know if it is the same issue, but I have noticed recently (within the last month or two) that my totem plays videos (isn't FLV specific) at seconds per frame instead of frames per second. Using VLC works perfectly fine, and it doesn't matter whether I am using compiz or metacity. Jaymon, does it ONLY happen with FLVs for you? Do all other types play perfectly fine in totem? ** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Video plays really slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243229 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 160996] Re: evince has trouble handling filename with escaped shell characters
Hi Lars. I notice the title says trouble with escaped shell characters, but as Pedro mentioned, you aren't actually escaping them, unless by escaping you are referring to the quotes around just part of the filename. I have never seen a partially quoted filename but perhaps it is valid. If this is the case can you try escaping the colon with a backslash, otherwise if the single quotes are part of the filename, try Pedro's solution, and report back? Thanks! ** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low -- evince has trouble handling filename with escaped shell characters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 9054] Re: gedit does not read from a pipe
Any reason this is 'Wishlist' if the documentation explicitly mentions piping as a feature (Gedit Manual / Programming Features): You can use gedit to pipe the output of a command to a text file. For example, to pipe the output of an ls command to a text file, type ls | gedit, then press Return. The output of the ls command is displayed in a new text file in the gedit window. It seems like either this bug shouldn't be wishlist (I assume Low instead), or there should be another bug to the effect of gedit documentation says it can read from pipes although it can't -- gedit does not read from a pipe https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9054 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 238615] Re: Date selection error in evolution when using persian translation
** Summary changed: - Date selection error in evelution when using persian translation + Date selection error in evolution when using persian translation -- Date selection error in evolution when using persian translation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238615 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236778] Re: gnome-appearance-properties causes CPU spike in Hardy
Since there has been a lot of discussion regarding the status of this, I just want to confirm that the latest fix downloaded earlier today fixed the issue on my end. -- gnome-appearance-properties causes CPU spike in Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236778] Re: gnome-appearance-properties causes CPU spike in Hardy
I updated to 1:2.22.2-0ubuntu3 but still notice the high CPU/lag issue, particularly when using the mouse to select. -- gnome-appearance-properties causes CPU spike in Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 238364] Re: nautilus crashes when copying hebrew named folders
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = nautilus -- nautilus crashes when copying hebrew named folders https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236778] Re: gnome-appearance-properties causes CPU spike in Hardy
does downgrading to the hardy version fix the issue? I noticed the issue in the standard hardy version in the first place which prompted me to try the version in -proposed, but both act in the same CPU intensive and sluggish manner, especially when using the mouse. -- gnome-appearance-properties causes CPU spike in Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 238388] Re: change desktop background dialog box have an infinite loop
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 236778 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236778 Hi Arda, thanks for using Ubuntu and thanks for taking the time to contribute by filing a bug report! This particular bug however is a duplicate of bug #236778, so please read it, add any information you may have, and direct your comments there. Thanks again! ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 236778 gnome-appearance-properties causes CPU spike in Hardy -- change desktop background dialog box have an infinite loop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238388 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee (via bug 236778). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 237769] Re: [hardy] System-Preferences-Appearance (gnome-appearance-properties) cannot set wallpaper by clicking
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 236778 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236778 Hello charlesindeed and FrenchNux! Please do not comment in a duplicate bug as developers will not read comments here. Please go to bug #236778 (as noted above) and leave your comments there, so they will be read. Thanks for contributing! This will get the bug the proper amount of attention. -- [hardy] System-Preferences-Appearance (gnome-appearance-properties) cannot set wallpaper by clicking https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237769 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236778] Re: gnome-appearance-properties causes CPU spike in Hardy
Hi Sebastien. I have edited the title to reflect my understanding of this bug. I *think* what happened is that the original problem appeared in hardy-proposed and this bug was filed. Regardless of this bug the -proposed was pushed to updates, and as such people are commenting about having the issue without -proposed (I can confirm I have this issue without -proposed). THEN a fix for this issue was put in -proposed, so now proposed is fixed, while it is broken in an updated Hardy (reversed from initially when the bug was filed). Does that make sense? Can anyone confirm? ** Summary changed: - gnome-appearance-properties causes CPU spike hardy-proposed + gnome-appearance-properties causes CPU spike in Hardy ** Description changed: Binary package hint: nautilus - Recent updates in hardy-proposed causes a significant cpu spike when - using gnome-appearance-properties to change desktop backgrounds. - Selecting the background wallpaper by using a mouse is very slow and - responsive, however using the keyboard arrows is more responsive. gnome- - appearance-properties also takes up much of the CPU during this process. - There were recent changes in nautilus and gnome-desktop that fix issues - with backgrounds, but seem to have introduced a regression. + Recent updates in hardy-proposed (now pushed out to updates) causes a + significant cpu spike when using gnome-appearance-properties to change + desktop backgrounds. Selecting the background wallpaper by using a mouse + is very slow and responsive, however using the keyboard arrows is more + responsive. gnome-appearance-properties also takes up much of the CPU + during this process. There were recent changes in nautilus and gnome- + desktop that fix issues with backgrounds, but seem to have introduced a + regression. + + It appears that now a fix for this is in -proposed. -- gnome-appearance-properties causes CPU spike in Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236778] Re: gnome-appearance-properties causes CPU spike in Hardy
Sebastien, could you clarify fixed for everybody? Do you mean everyone who has enabled -proposed and is updated in that respect? Because I do not use -proposed, and definitely DO have this bug on my end with normal updates. -- gnome-appearance-properties causes CPU spike in Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 238202] Re: Adding a background from the host to the Appearances Preferences as a Wallpaper crashes the manager when trying to choose other wallpapers
Hi Razor, thanks for using Ubuntu and thanks for taking the time to file this bug report. Would you mind taking a look at bug #236778 and seeing if that is actually your issue? If so we can mark this as a duplicate and get it more attention, otherwise if it is a separate issue we will need more information. Thanks and I await your response! ** Changed in: gnome-desktop (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = gnome-desktop Status: New = Incomplete -- Adding a background from the host to the Appearances Preferences as a Wallpaper crashes the manager when trying to choose other wallpapers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238202 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-desktop in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 237809] Re: Plain UI?! Introducing Moodbar
Hi Mik3, and thanks for using Ubuntu! You might consider making a blueprint for this in Launchpad, explaining it in more detail (such as what determines the colors on the bar?). Blueprints are generally the way to go for improvements, as opposed to bugs. -- Plain UI?! Introducing Moodbar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237809 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 237809] Re: Plain UI?! Introducing Moodbar
** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Plain UI?! Introducing Moodbar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237809 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 237990] Re: Appearance preferances background doesn't respond to mouse clicks
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 236778 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236778 Hi pt123, thanks for using Ubuntu and filing a bug report. However, this particular report is a duplicate of bug #236778, so please see that bug for more information, add any information it may be missing, and direct your comments there. Thanks! ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 236778 gnome appearance properties causes CPU spike hardy-proposed -- Appearance preferances background doesn't respond to mouse clicks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237990 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236778] Re: gnome appearance properties causes CPU spike hardy-proposed
** Tags added: metabug ** Summary changed: - gnome appearance properties causes CPU spike hardy-proposed + gnome-appearance-properties causes CPU spike hardy-proposed ** Description changed: Binary package hint: nautilus - Recent updates in hardy-propsed causes a significant cpu spike when - enabling the gnome-appearance-properties. You also unable to select - background wallpaper by using a mouse. It only allows the wallpaper to - be selected via keyboard. There were recent changes in nautilus and - gnome-desktop that fixes issues with backgrounds, but seem to have - introduced a regression. + Recent updates in hardy-proposed causes a significant cpu spike when + using gnome-appearance-properties to change desktop backgrounds. + Selecting the background wallpaper by using a mouse is very slow and + responsive, however using the keyboard arrows is more responsive. gnome- + appearance-properties also takes up much of the CPU during this process. + There were recent changes in nautilus and gnome-desktop that fix issues + with backgrounds, but seem to have introduced a regression. -- gnome-appearance-properties causes CPU spike hardy-proposed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236778] Re: gnome-appearance-properties causes CPU spike hardy-proposed
I don't get updates from Hardy proposed yet I notice this bug today. Did it get released into normal updates, and if so, am I understanding correctly that now a fix is proposed? -- gnome-appearance-properties causes CPU spike hardy-proposed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 136702] Re: nautilus 'replace file' dialog box could give more information
Yeah, this seriously hinders usability. I was shocked the first time I realized I was going to have to go into the other folder, look at the size and dates, and compare them with the others file myself, for each file that already existed, each time I did this. Also I can't believe this has been a bug in Gnome for 7 years, and they even recently considered marking it as WONTFIX! This seems rather important/crucial for the default display manager of an OS. -- nautilus 'replace file' dialog box could give more information https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 235352] Re: tagging doesn't seem to work
I have had this behavior as well, but with specific mp3s, not all of them. No matter how many times I would retag a certain one, it would always revert after a second or two. I restarted rhythmbox, and the computer itself, but nothing worked. James, would you mind clarifying if this happens with ALL tagging, just specific formats, or just certain ones? If it isn't all of them, then I think the title is deceptive. Thanks! -- tagging doesn't seem to work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235352 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 9054] Re: gedit does not read from a pipe
Hello, I would just like to add that this also affects Hardy. Also I appreciate the workaround Igor, but it is unwieldy and assumes you have write access to the working directory, which is not always going to be the case. The upstream bug report seems somewhat stagnant; a patch or two is provided but from what I gather they are too old to be applicable to the current codebase. -- gedit does not read from a pipe https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9054 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 191650] Re: [hardy] there's no 'custom' desktop effect profile after installing ccsm
Nick and Sebastien, the most reasonable solution is to enable the Custom option after installing compizconfig-settingsmanager and not just simple-ccsm. The reason why this is important is because if you install compizconfig-settingsmanager and then change the option in Appearances, your settings are lost forever! Basically by doing this, we are not supporting the use of ccsm, only simple-ccsm, which seems silly. The best solution IMO is to offer the Custom option always there, and if they click it without ccsm or simple-ccsm, offer to install either (with a third option to not install anything, since some people can use gconf as previously mentioned), explaining the differences (ie, advanced vs simple), and then install and launch the appropriate one. Either way settings are being lost without enabling Custom for ccsm and I think that is important, I for one have lost all my settings that way at least once by disabling Compiz via Appearance, and then realizing I had no way to re-enable my custom settings. -- [hardy] there's no 'custom' desktop effect profile after installing ccsm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191650 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 191650] Re: [hardy] there's no 'custom' desktop effect profile after installing ccsm
those users have no need to run this tab at all if they don't want to select one of the default choices Yes Sebastien, you have hit on EXACTLY the point, but are looking at it backwards!!! We DO want to be able to select one the default choices, after using ccsm, without losing all of our settings! This could be done in Gutsy, users like Nick and I want to do it in Hardy. It is a very real and practical use case. -- [hardy] there's no 'custom' desktop effect profile after installing ccsm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191650 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 191650] Re: [hardy] there's no 'custom' desktop effect profile after installing ccsm
Yes Sebastien, I don't recall any issues in switching between None/Normal/Extra and Custom. It seemed to remember my settings. Are you saying it shouldn't, or that it is supposed to but doesn't for some people? -- [hardy] there's no 'custom' desktop effect profile after installing ccsm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191650 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 97158] Re: window title doesn't show a CD's volume name
From duplicate bug #226517, another screenshot was attached which more clearly illustrates where the volume name is used and where the drive name is used. I have attached it here. Thanks Jeldert. ** Attachment added: cdrom0.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14199537/cdrom0.png -- window title doesn't show a CD's volume name https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97158 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 18673] Re: Draws un-expected/unwanted scroll bars
Okay, well since people are discussing this existence of this, I can confirm it on Hardy RC. -- Draws un-expected/unwanted scroll bars https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18673 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 78038] Re: rhythmbox interferes with suspend
Thanks so much Sebastien for helping squash this bug! I think you have saved some data with this one, and definitely frustration from all the upgraders who would have otherwise not been able to shutdown with music playing. I am also very glad to see that you took my suggestion and made the plugin not hidden by default either. This should make it easier for people to discover it and use it for a fair use case of listening to music when closing the lid, while normally having suspend or hibernate occur for this action. Once http://ubuntuguide.org/wiki/Ubuntu:Hardy becomes existent, I can put an entry there. However, Sebastien, do you know if there is a more important underlying bug? It is my understanding that Rhythmbox shouldn't be allowed to deny the suspend/hibernate on critical battery. Have we discovered a deeper issue, or not? -- rhythmbox interferes with suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/78038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
